Answer:He used it to contrast the two halves of the United States at the time. One half of the Union allowed slavery, and the other did not. His message was that if the country continued on this path, it would break in two, which it ultimately did, leading to America's Civil War.
Explanation:
pls give me brainliest
and have a good day
_______ Important factors in the wealth of a country, includes minerals and timber?
Answer:
Natural resources like minerals and timber can play a significant role in a nation's wealth. Countries that have plentiful natural resources can often benefit from the sale and export of those resources, which can contribute to economic growth and improve their overall wealth. However, it's also critical to keep in mind that relying excessively on the export of natural resources can cause instability and volatility in the economy, particularly if those prices fluctuate dramatically on a worldwide scale.
What was president Lincoln’s central goal during the civil war
Answer:
President Lincoln's central goal was to preserve the Union.
Explanation: Hope it helps you :))))
What is the main difference between primary and secondary sources?
Answer:
Primary sources are firsthand, while secondary sources are made secondhand
Explanation:
firsthand meaning by someone who was there to experience an event and recorded the experience (diary, autobiography, voice recording)
secondhand meaning by someone who is telling the account of another person when they didn't experience it themselves (biography, a movie based on true events)
1. After World War 2, Texas underwent many changes. One change was a huge increase in the state's ______.
2. President Eisenhower supported the creation of an ______ highway system to connect all states with high quality roads.
3. Because of new highways, people could live in ______ and drive to their jobs in the downtown area.
4. As ______ grew, the number of small, family-owned farms decreased.
5. The increased use of farm machinery and ______ greatly increased crop production.
After World War 2, Texas underwent many changes, and one change was a huge increase in the state's population.
What is population?Population refers to the total number of individuals or organisms of a particular species living within a specific geographical area or region. It is a fundamental concept in ecology, demographics, and social sciences. The size and characteristics of a population are determined by various factors, including birth and death rates, migration patterns, and environmental factors such as resource availability and climate. Population size and growth rate have significant implications for social, economic, and environmental issues, such as urbanization, healthcare, food security, and biodiversity conservation. Understanding population dynamics is crucial for sustainable development and effective policy-making, particularly in the context of global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and human health.
To learn more about population, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30781042
#SPJ1
What was the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
A. The declaration of war by South Vietnam on the US
B. The attacking of a US ship in a Vietnamese harbor
C. The bombing of a South Vietnamese town
D. The first US attack on Vietnamese soil
Answer:
Option B is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a series of events in August 1964 that involved the alleged attacks on two American naval destroyers, USS Maddox and USS Turner Joy, by North Vietnamese patrol boats in the Gulf of Tonkin. As a result, the US Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized the use of military force by US armed forces in Vietnam.
Which of the following describes a way in which enslaved Africans would
resist the conditions of slavery?
Choose 1 answer:
converting to Judaism
contracting smallpox
working at a faster pace
breaking tools which one is correct
Answer: They broke tools.
Explanation: Don't worry this answer is correct, I answered this question on khan Academy :).
What is the current balance between the government protecting the public from terrorist threats while also protecting people’s individual rights
the current balance is atleast high levels of the terrorist threats in the US and all around the world while also protecting the individual rights of the people 60% of it is on the individual rights and the 40% is on the terrorist threats
The most highly populated region in Canada is: the Cordilleran region the St. Lawrence Lowlands region the Interior Plains region the Pacific region
The St. Lawrence Lowlands, home to major cities like Montreal, Quebec City, and Toronto, is Canada's most populous region.
Is the St. Lawrence Lowlands the region with the most people?
The ecozone reaches Quebec City along the St. Lawrence shoreline. The "most populous and prosperous terrestrial ecozone" is represented by it. and its two major cities, Toronto, Ontario, and Montreal, Quebec, are home to roughly half of Canada's population.
Choose the Lowlands area as the most populous region in Canada.
One of Canada's most rich, inhabited, and productive regions is the St. Lawrence Lowlands.
To know more about Toronto visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/6391311
#SPJ1
Why did the Cold War accelerate the end of Jim Crow?
The Santa Fe Trail was used as a trade route between Mexico and:
A. Montana.
B. California.
C. Oregon.
D. Missouri.
Answer:
Yo, the Santa Fe Trail was a trade route back in the day, connectin' Mexico with Missouri, man. So the answer is D. Missouri, bro!
Answer: D.Missouri
Explanation:
Missouri is where it started and Mexico is where it ended.
Illegal drugs are a problem in Colombia. true or false?
Answer: very true jesus how much there is. its crazy
Explanation:
Which of these occurred as a result of the Fifteenth Amendment?
African American families divided by slavery were reunited.
Newly free men and women moved west to claim land.
African American men voted in the 1872 presidential election.
Newly free men and women were allowed to apply for U.S. citizenship.
Answer: #3 = African American men voted in the 1872 presidential election. her u go!!
Answer the following in at least 5-8 complete sentences.
In your own words, provide a definition for the term imperialism that addresses the four different arguments about the causes and values of imperialism (as mentioned in the article).
First argument: Does Imperialism pay?
Second argument: Imperialism is the nature of human beings.
Third argument: Strategy and security of the region.
Fourth argument: Moral grounds- the spread of religion.
Part 2 - Opinion Writing:
Based on what you have learned in this unit, as well as from the article, write an introductory paragraph to an essay expressing your opinion on the issue of imperialism. Overall, is imperialism a positive or negative condition and/or policy, and what are some examples to support your position?
Answer:
L'impérialisme peut être défini comme une politique d'expansion territoriale et d'influence politique et économique sur d'autres nations et peuples. Cette politique a été motivée par différents arguments, notamment économiques, humains, stratégiques et moraux. Certains ont justifié l'impérialisme en affirmant qu'il était rentable, que la domination était la nature humaine, que cela garantissait la sécurité régionale ou que c'était une façon de propager une religion. Cependant, d'autres ont critiqué cette politique en affirmant que c'était une forme de domination et d'exploitation qui nuisait aux peuples soumis. Ils ont également souligné les effets négatifs sur la culture et la société des nations dominées. En fin de compte, l'impérialisme peut être considéré comme une politique et une condition à la fois positives et négatives, en fonction des motivations, des méthodes et des conséquences. Dans cet essai, je vais soutenir que l'impérialisme est généralement une politique négative en raison des conséquences néfastes pour les peuples dominés, mais que dans certains cas, il peut être considéré comme positif, par exemple lorsque les peuples dominés bénéficient d'une modernisation bénéfique, d'une meilleure gouvernance et de protections accrues contre les conflits. Pour illustrer mon point de vue, je vais examiner plusieurs exemples d'impérialisme dans l'histoire, tels que le colonialisme européen en Afrique, l'impérialisme japonais en Asie et l'expansion américaine dans les Caraïbes et en Amérique latine.
Explanation:
Explain what events and actions caused the conflict
between Barbara Frietchie and the Confederate soldiers.
Write three to four sentences.
While Confederate soldiers marched by, Barbara Frietchie flew a Union flag.
What about Barbara Fritchie?According to Barbara Fritchie's tale, as Confederate troops advanced into Union territory and drew near a particular town, the men there took down the Union flags that were flying out of concern for retaliation.
Barbara Fritchie would have none of that, so she: went outside and flew the Union flag; rebuked General "Stonewall" Jackson for trying to convince her to take it down by reminding him that it was the flag of the United States and that he must respect it; and went back inside and lowered the Union flag. She requested that no soldier take the flag down, and General Jackson complied.
To learn more about Barbara Fritchie, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/2720323
Answer the questions please with the cartoon you see please I will give brainliest
Words and visuals in the first cartoon include: Hybrid cars, health care, refinancing and the visuals include a mall, the text boxes, and the environment.
In the second picture, we can see one big and one small persons. In the text box, there is a message: You realize this means war.
Relation of the cartoons to domestic and foreign poilciesThe first cartoon relates to domestic policy because it deals with issues that affect a nationa dn its people.
Some of these issues are healthcare, and finance. In the second picture we can see the subject of foreign policy as war often involves different nations.
Learn more about domestic and foreign policies here:
https://brainly.com/question/1258683
#SPJ1
How did the ideas expressed in "The White Man's
Burden" affect the lives of colonized people?
Answer:
Explanation:
"The White Man's Burden" was a poem written by Rudyard Kipling in 1899 that promoted the idea of imperialism and the idea that it was the duty of white people to civilize and uplift the so-called "uncivilized" people of the world. The ideas expressed in the poem had a profound impact on the lives of colonized people, particularly those living in Africa, Asia, and the Pacific.
Firstly, the idea of the "white man's burden" provided a justification for colonialism and imperialism. European powers used this idea to justify their colonization of other countries, arguing that it was their duty to bring civilization and progress to so-called "uncivilized" people. This led to the subjugation and exploitation of colonized peoples, as their resources were often taken without their consent, and their cultures and ways of life were suppressed.
Secondly, the ideas of "The White Man's Burden" led to the imposition of European culture and values on colonized peoples. European colonizers believed that their way of life was superior to that of the colonized people, and they often sought to impose their culture, religion, and values on the colonized populations. This led to the erasure of local cultures and traditions, and often resulted in the loss of indigenous languages and ways of life.
Thirdly, the ideas of "The White Man's Burden" led to the creation of hierarchies based on race and ethnicity. European colonizers believed that they were superior to the colonized people, and this led to the creation of racial hierarchies that placed white people at the top and people of color at the bottom. This system of racial hierarchy led to widespread discrimination and the denial of basic rights and freedoms to colonized people.
Overall, the ideas expressed in "The White Man's Burden" had a profound impact on the lives of colonized people. These ideas led to the justification of colonialism and imperialism, the imposition of European culture and values, and the creation of racial hierarchies that denied basic rights and freedoms to colonized people.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The Venetians and Ottomans were trade partners because?
Answer:
a mutually beneficial relationship providing each with access to key ports and valuable goods
Explanation:
i hope this helps :)
Which of the following was NOT a decision made at the Yalta Conference?
A. Soviets did not have to allow free elections in occupied cities
B. The Soviets would join the war against Japan
C. Germany would be divided into four parts
D. Germans were to pay reparations for the war
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Why did the Texans declare independence in 1836?
Examine two or more significant conflicts in the struggle for independence from Britain. Describe the successes and failures of each side, and provide a perspective that explains how the manner in which these wars were fought reveals something about the distinctions between the colonists and the British.
Although the colonists suffered a heavy defeat at Bunker Hill, it also demonstrated to the British that they were prepared to fight and were capable of holding their own. Although they were able to take the hill, the British incurred significant losses in the process, which had a negative impact on their spirits.
Due to a substantial colonial victory, the Battle of Saratoga marked a turning point in the Revolutionary War. The colonists' morale was raised as a result of the British being forced to surrender, and they also received crucial French backing.
The tactics used in these battles provide insight into the differences between the colonists and the British. While the British liked to battle in broad fields in traditional formation, the colonists depended on guerilla tactics like hiding behind buildings and trees and firing at the British from cover.
This demonstrates the colonists' ability to adapt and employ novel tactics in conflict as well as their capacity to make use of their familiarity with the environment. The British, on the other hand, were less willing to adjust to the shifting conditions and were more dogmatic in their approach to battle.
learn more about independence from Britain here
https://brainly.com/question/1410857
#SPJ1
NOT B.
What weakness of Japan’s geography did the allies exploit?
A. Japan’s borders are very large, so Allies were able to sneak in undetected
B. Japan has large oil fields, so Allies were able to take the oil to refuel while fighting
C. Japan relies on imports, so Allies cut off supply lines
D. Japan has no access to the sea, so Allies surrounded them easily
Answer:
c
Explanation:
What type of leader was Theodora
Answer:
One of the most powerful women in Byzantine history was Theodora, an empress who was married to Justinian I in the sixth century. She promoted religious and social policies that were significant to her by using her position of strength and influence.
Explanation:
Theodora's successes were entirely her own, the product of her astute political savvy, quick wit, astute social skills, and strong moral convictions.
what was the result of the war of 1812?
The War of 1812 was a war between the United States and Great Britain, which lasted from 1812 to 1815. Despite some early American successes, such as victory at the Battle of Lake Erie, the war was generally inconclusive and ended in a draw. In 1814, both sides agreed to a peace treaty called the Treaty of Ghent, which restored relations between the two countries to the way they were before the war. One of the long-term effects of the war was that it strengthened the feeling of national unity in the United States and led to further territorial expansion in the West.
Can someone help me to answer these questions please
Listen to Kerry Washington perform Sojourner Truth's speech Ain't I a Woman. Then go to ST's version at the Sojourner Truth Project's website. Compare the differences between Frances Gage's (the one Washington read) and Marius Robinson's earlier version (the one ST read). You can read them here.
Answer the following questions:
1. List 3 differences between the Robinson version and the Gage version of the speech.
2. Why do you think it is important to hear both versions of the speech?
3. How do you think the differences changed the way people (in the north and the south) understood the context of her speech? How about now?
4. How does hearing the differences in dialect change the way you think about the speech?
answer them in at least 10 sentences.
When women’s rights activists spoke out, who were they advocating for, white women or African-American women?
What are the distinct arguments that Truth makes in her speech?
What is Truth saying about women’s rights?
Who is going to give them these rights?
How does Truth’s speech reflect intersectionality?
What passages in the speech reflect this?
The city state of Venice should only be governed by merchants who understand buisness and not by catholic clergy who only understand the Bible ?
Answer:
It is worth noting that the governance of the city state of Venice during its history was complex and involved various groups, including merchants and the Catholic Church. The role and influence of different groups in Venice's government varied over time, and different individuals and factions had different perspectives on what was best for the city and its people. Ultimately, the effectiveness and legitimacy of a government depend on many factors, including the competence and integrity of its leaders, the quality of its institutions, and the support and participation of its citizens.
how were the victims of Racims in both germany in south Africa
Answer:
Racism had a significant impact on both Germany and South Africa in the past, but the nature and scope of racism differed in both countries.
In Germany, during the Nazi regime led by Adolf Hitler, millions of Jews, Romas, homosexuals, disabled people, and others were targeted and systematically murdered in what became known as the Holocaust. This was a result of Nazi ideology that deemed certain groups of people as inferior and unworthy of life. The Holocaust is considered one of the most significant tragedies in human history and serves as a reminder of the devastating consequences of racism, discrimination, and prejudice.
In South Africa, apartheid was a system of institutionalized racial segregation that was implemented by the white minority government in the mid-20th century. It resulted in widespread discrimination, inequality, and human rights abuses against non-white South Africans, particularly Black people. Non-white people were denied many basic rights, such as access to education, housing, and employment. The apartheid system was ultimately dismantled in the early 1990s, following years of protests, sanctions, and international pressure.
Both Germany and South Africa have since made efforts to acknowledge and address their respective histories of racism, including through education, remembrance, and policies aimed at promoting equality and combating discrimination.
Why didn't delegates at the Second Constitutional Convention end slavery in Tennessee?
Slavery-abolitionist groups petitioned the convention, but the delegates disapproved of the request. The constitution expanded the number of ways that people might participate in politics, but it only granted white males the right to vote.
What is Constitutional Convention?Between May and September of 1787, the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention gathered to discuss how to fix the issues caused by the Articles of Confederation's flimsy central administration. The Federal Convention met to amend the Articles of Confederation on May 14, 1787, in Philadelphia's State House (Independence Hall). The members met seldom because there were initially only two state delegations present, adjourning each day until a quorum of seven states was reached on May 25. The nascent nation was in danger of breaking apart because to the states' disputes about trade, taxation, trade rights, and territory. A Grand Convention of state delegates was called by Alexander Hamilton in order to work on amending the Articles of Confederation.To learn more about Constitutional Convention, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/606222
.Due to the difficulties of passing immigration reform through a Republican-controlled Congress, President Obama chose to issue the executive order "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)" as a means of protecting the immigrant children who have grown up in the United States After repeated efforts to get additional funding for a new wall along the U.S.-Mexico border from the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives failed, President Trump finally issued the executive order: "Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements" as a means of using existing federal funds to begin building the wall. What do both of these scenarios demonstrate about why presidents use executive orders?
Answer:
President Obama proposed improving legal immigration processes, strengthening border security, deporting people convicted of a felony, expanding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, and creating the Deferred Action for Parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program. DACA and DAPA were the most controversial elements of the president's plan with Republican critics, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Sen. Mike Lee (Utah), saying that the programs were a form of amnesty.[8] President Obama responded to these criticisms, saying, "I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not. Amnesty is the immigration system we have today – millions of people who live here without paying their taxes or playing by the rules, while politicians use the issue to scare people and whip up votes at election time."[7]
Texas and the 25 states that brought a lawsuit against the Obama administration argued that President Obama did not have the authority to implement DAPA because it was essentially a new law. The brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Texas and the states argued that "DAPA is a crucial change in the Nation’s immigration law and policy—and that is precisely why it could be created only by Congress, rather than unilaterally imposed by the Executive.
The Obama administration argued that the president's actions were legal because Congress had given the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the ability to administer and enforce immigration laws under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The DHS secretary had the authority to decide whom to deport and whom to grant deferred action to under the INA, and "Congress has repeatedly recognized" this ability in other legislation. The United States government argued that the ruling of the appeals court, which stated that DAPA could not be implemented, "will allow States to frustrate the federal government’s enforcement of the Nation’s immigration laws. It will force millions of people—who are not removal priorities under criteria the court conceded are valid, and who are parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents—to continue to work off the books, without the option of lawful employment to provide for their families.
6 Clever | Log in
Prodigy Education
Fill in the blanks to tell what Blare
did to help the children of Haiti.
The plan was for Blare to deliver more than just his one unique bear to Haiti. He intended to appeal to his neighborhood to gather several bears. He wanted to amass 2,000 bears. Many children in Haiti would be inspired by that.
Blare Gooch: Who is he?Blare Gooch, a 13-year-old from Grand Rapids with connections to Bronson, was chosen by Parenting magazine as one of the "Kids of the Year" for his "Blare's Bears for Haiti" campaign.
Does Haiti pose a threat?Avoid traveling to Haiti due to kidnapping, bloodshed, and unrest there. Americans need to leave Haiti immediately due to the current security, medical, and infrastructure problems. United States citizens who want to leave Port-au-Prince should follow local news reports and only depart when it is judged safe to do so.
Learn more about infrastructure problems: https://brainly.com/question/3808148
#SPJ1
What evidence supports the fact that this image is of a trial? Check all of the boxes that apply. The women are pointing. The women are wearing white hats. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury.
A. The women are pointing and C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury. These are the evidences from image that supports the fact that this image is of a trial.
Hence, options A. and C. are the right choice.
Trial and example: what are they?A judicial hearing to decide the outcome of a specific case is known as a trial. For example-Should your cousin be detained for taking her neighbor's dog, she may face a Trial.
What stage of the trial is that?A trial is when parties to a disagreement gather together to submit information as evidence in a formal setting, often a court, before a judge, jury, or another authority tasked by law with finding a fact, in an effort to resolve their conflict.
To know more about Trial visit:
https://brainly.com/question/249570
#SPJ1
The complete question is-
What evidence supports the fact that this image is of a trial? Check all of the boxes that apply. ( The image is added below)
A. The women are pointing.
B. The women are wearing white hats.
C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury.