3. How does state sovereignty limit attempt to create formal global governance organizations?

American Express looks at historical transactions to predict consumer behaviors. By watching how current and past customers have used their credit, American Express can predict churn and customer loyalty. This statement is True.

American Express is a financial services corporation. It is a global corporation that provides various financial products and services, including credit cards, travel-related services, and other services. American Express uses customer data to make strategic decisions and tailor its products and services to the customer's needs.

American Express uses transaction data to predict consumer behaviors. By analyzing transaction data, American Express can predict churn and customer loyalty. It also enables American Express to provide personalized recommendations and offers to its customers.

Historical transaction data analysis helps American Express to optimize its business operations. It helps the company to identify and address issues related to credit and customer service. American Express also uses transaction data analysis to identify high-risk customers and mitigate fraud.

American Express's transaction data analysis helps to understand customer behaviors and preferences. By analyzing customer behaviors, American Express can develop new products and services that meet customer needs.

American Express also uses transaction data analysis to provide personalized customer service and targeted marketing campaigns.

Learn more about American Express at

https://brainly.com/question/29680015

#SPJ11

Answer:

Read Below:

Explanation:

Based on the scenario provided, it is not clear whether the officers are justified in using deadly force against the suspect as the suspect has not displayed any weapon. In general, the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers is only justifiable when the officer reasonably believes that the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others.

In this case, while Lonny Smith is a known criminal who has previously fired his weapon during an arrest, he has not displayed any weapon or made any threatening gestures towards the officers. Therefore, the use of deadly force would be difficult to justify, and the officers should exhaust all other options before resorting to lethal force.

The officers should attempt to apprehend the suspect using less-lethal force, such as verbal commands, physical force, or non-lethal weapons like pepper spray or a Taser. If the suspect resists arrest or attempts to flee, the officers may pursue and attempt to apprehend him, but they should not use deadly force unless they reasonably believe that the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm to them or others.

It is important for law enforcement officers to use good judgment and follow established protocols when dealing with potentially dangerous situations to ensure that they uphold the law and protect both the public and themselves.

Answer & Explanation:

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution outlawed slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. It was ratified on December 6, 1865.

The true statement about the Nestlé case is that babies were dying because the mothers didn't know how to use the formula. The Nestlé case refers to a controversy surrounding the marketing of infant formula, particularly in developing countries, where mothers were not adequately informed on how to use the formula properly.

As a result, many babies suffered from malnutrition and some even died due to improper preparation and usage of the formula.The other two statements mentioned are not accurate. The formula was not sold to mothers by milk nurses, and the Nestlé slogan was not "the white man's powder that will make your baby glow and grow."

In summary, the Nestlé case highlights the importance of providing accurate and clear instructions on how to use infant formula, as well as promoting awareness about breastfeeding as a safer and healthier alternative for mothers and babies, especially in developing countries where clean water and proper sanitation may not always be available.

Know more about malnutrition here:

https://brainly.com/question/30514873

#SPJ11

Although the Posse Comitatus Act limits the federal government's authority to use the military to enforce domestic policies, there are exceptions that can be made to the rule.

Learn more about Posse Comitatus Act: https://brainly.com/question/27885404

#SPJ11

Based on the information presented in Chapter 11 of the PowerPoint, the "Direct Supervision Model" seems best suited to addressing the challenges of running a prison in today's environment.

The Direct Supervision Model involves placing correctional officers in direct contact with inmates in a centralized unit, rather than relying on remote surveillance or physical barriers to maintain control. This model has been shown to reduce violence and disorder in prisons, as well as increase staff and inmate safety.

Moreover, the Direct Supervision Model can help address the issue of increased inmate access to the outside world through cellphones, as correctional officers are in direct contact with inmates and can more effectively monitor their behavior and communications.

In addition, the Direct Supervision Model can also help reduce corrections budgets by minimizing the need for costly physical barriers and remote surveillance systems. Instead, this model focuses on the direct interaction between correctional officers and inmates, which can improve outcomes and reduce costs in the long run.

To know more about communications.

https://brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ4

When anything is broadcast, it is done using radio waves or other electronic means as opposed to publishing, which is the action of issuing a media (such as a publication).

State or government media, as well as public service broadcasting, can all be referred to as "public media" (PBS). Yet, there are distinctions between them. According to the ACE Electoral Knowledge Network, PBS is not directly under the jurisdiction of the state or government, although state and government media are.

Newspapers, books, magazines, and pamphlets): Less control, more freedom. Broadcast (radio, television): moderate freedom in the middle

Common carriers, such as the telephone, telegraph, and postal service: Less freedom most command.

To know more about media content visit:-

brainly.com/question/14836405

#SPJ9

Complete question:

Explain the difference between common carriers, broadcasters, and publishers with regard to court decisions covering freedom of speech and control of content.

Answer: Hope this helps.

Explanation:

State Authority Occupational Crime refers to illegal activities committed by individuals in positions of authority in government or state organizations, using their power for personal gain or to benefit the organization they work for. An example of a State Authority Occupational Crime would be an elected official embezzling public funds for personal use, a police officer accepting bribes to overlook criminal activities, or a public official awarding contracts to companies in exchange for personal favors or kickbacks. Another example would be a public official using their influence to influence government policies or regulations to benefit a particular business or industry in which they have a financial interest.

Money laundering is an example of State Authority Occupational crime.

State authority occupational crimes are crimes that happen when someone uses the power that has been legitimately granted to them by someone with the ability to execute the law or to order others to commit the crime. These crimes are often referred to as white-collar crimes.

Money laundering is the practice of fraudulently disguising the source of funds earned via unlawful activities such as the sale of illegal drugs, corruption, embezzlement, or gambling by rerouting them through a legitimate source.

Hence, Money laundering is an example of State Authority Occupational Crime.

To learn more about Occupational crimes, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/3187325

#SPJ4

In Williams v. NC (1942), the NC did not accept the Williams' NV marriage because the Williams were not bona fide NC residents. The Option A is correct.

Williams v. North Carolina is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court determined that the federal government determines marriage and divorce statuses across state lines. Mr. Williams and Ms. Hendrix relocated to Nevada and divorced their respective spouses.

Mr. Williams and Ms. Hendrix married and returned to North Carolina after their divorces were finalized. They lived there together until they were charged with bigamous cohabitation by the state of North Carolina.

Read more about Williams v. NC

brainly.com/question/21925934

#SPJ1

In a governmental election, campaign officials may want to know what percentage of the population voted in the previous election.

To obtain the percentage of the population that voted in the previous governmental election, the following formula is utilized: Percentage of the population that voted = (Number of votes cast / Total population) * 100The number of votes cast refers to the number of votes that were cast in the previous election, whereas the total population refers to the total number of individuals residing in the constituency where the election was held. The percentage of the population that voted in the previous election can be used by campaign officials to determine the number of votes they must earn to win the election.

In addition, this information can be utilized to determine the participation rate in the previous election and to evaluate the success of any efforts to raise voter turnout.

Read more about governmental election here:https://brainly.com/question/25815264

#SPJ11

1. Why did the Supreme Court decide three cases in one opinion?

The Supreme Court decided three cases in one opinion because it saw them as presenting similar legal issues and wanted to ensure consistency across the decisions.

2. What is the main issue the Supreme Court is deciding on in this opinion?

The main issue the Supreme Court is deciding in this opinion is whether certain companies are legally obligated to provide contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

3. Explain in your own words the Supreme Court's reasoning for its holding.

The Supreme Court reasoned that the government cannot impose the contraceptive coverage mandate on closely-held companies because it would impose a substantial burden on the religious beliefs of their owners.

4. Can you explain the difference in the dissenting opinions of Justices Alito and Kavanaugh?

Justice Alito argued that the contraceptive mandate should not be held unconstitutional because it did not impose a substantial burden on the religious beliefs of closely-held companies, while Justice Kavanaugh argued that it was still an unconstitutional violation of religious liberty.

To know more about Supreme Court refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/12848156#

#SPJ11

The "pains of confinement" have long been a topic of interest in prison sociology. This article revisits the subject, arguing that contemporary criminal procedures have produced certain brand-new burdens and annoyances.

What is punishment strategy and mass incarceration?

It states that there are three categories into which the pains of imprisonment can be conceptually and somewhat historically subdivided: those resulting from the inherent characteristics of incarceration, those brought on by willful misconduct and duty neglect, and those brought on by systemic policies and institutional practices.

After thoroughly describing the latter, with an emphasis on the difficulties of indeterminacy, psychiatric evaluation, and self-government, the paper illustrates how the concepts of "tightness," "depth," and "weight" apply to the modern jail experience. That is a shortened way of saying that the United States imprisons more people than any other country in the world, including China. Also, the U.S. leads the world in terms of the number of prisoners. That are distinct from earlier pains in terms of their origins, characteristics, and outcomes.

Learn more about punishment strategy:

https://brainly.com/question/8801970

#SPJ1

The panopticon is a symbol of subordination of bodies, which increases the value of power while doing away with the need for a prince.

The Panopticon idea contends that people are susceptible to manipulation if they believe they are continuously being watched, even when no one is actually doing so. The theory is based on the impact that was intended when a jail featured a central guard tower that every prisoner could see, despite the fact that they could not see the guards.

To rank, arrange, and normalize people, Foucault (1995) claimed that surveillance is also a type of disciplinary authority. The watcher in the tower is aware of what the prisoners are doing in their cells, but they are not aware of his presence, much like the Foucauldian panopticon.

Learn more about panopticon: https://brainly.com/question/17924701

#SPJ1

In 1908, Theodore Roosevelt did not run for another term as president because he had promised not to run again in 1904. Therefore, the correct option is C. in 1904 he had promised not to run again.

In 1904, Roosevelt had won re-election as President. Before his second term, he announced he would not run for another term as President. Therefore, in 1908, Roosevelt kept his word and did not run for another term as President. He instead supported his Secretary of War, William Howard Taft, who was ultimately elected President.

To know more about President:

https://brainly.com/question/497462

#SPJ11

Judge Johnson is likely to favor leniency when sentencing the defendant in this case. Given his view that drug abuse is a sickness and a public health issue, he would likely opt for a more lenient sentencing, such as probation or community service, instead of harsher penalties such as incarceration. This could allow the defendant to get the help they need and potentially prevent future criminal activity.

Judge Johnson is also known for his extreme conservative views on crimes of violence. While this case does not involve violence, his past decisions demonstrate his preference for punishments that focus on rehabilitation rather than retribution.  The judge could also take into account the defendant’s circumstances, such as any underlying mental health issues, and attempt to craft a sentence that is tailored to the individual.

He is likely to favor a sentence for the defendant that focuses on helping them find a path away from crime.

Know more about incarceration here:

https://brainly.com/question/14300869

#SPJ11

Globalization and commodityization. A viewpoint known as late critical criminology first appeared in the 1980s in response to the perceived shortcomings of traditional criminology.

Commodification is the process by which things, such as products, services, knowledge, or even living things, become offered as part of a market transaction. Broadly speaking, capitalism is an economic system in which supplies and demands in the general market determine the exchange of goods and services.

to make something into a commodity (such as something with intrinsic value or a piece of art). commodification of the water supply attempted.

To know more about criminology  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/5137629

#SPJ1

Knowing whether a contract is bilateral or unilateral is important because the classification determines when the contract is legally binding. In general, a bilateral contract becomes legally binding as soon as both parties agree to the terms. By contrast, a unilateral contract only becomes legally binding when the other party accepts the offer and agrees to perform the action outlined in the contract.

Bilateral and unilateral contracts are two different kinds of contracts, each with its own set of legal implications. A bilateral contract is an agreement between two parties, each of which promises to do something in return for the other. In other words, both parties agree to exchange something of value. A unilateral contract, on the other hand, is a one-sided agreement in which only one party makes a promise.


Knowing whether a contract is bilateral or unilateral is thus essential for understanding when it is legally binding and the potential legal implications of the contract.

Know more about  legal implications here:

https://brainly.com/question/30194646

#SPJ11

Explanation:

"Fruit of the poisonous tree" is a legal term that refers to evidence that is obtained illegally or unlawfully. This principle holds that evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful or unconstitutional search, seizure, or interrogation is tainted and therefore inadmissible in court. The term is derived from the idea that evidence obtained from an illegal source is like a poisonous tree, where everything that grows from it is tainted and cannot be used.

Locard's Exchange Principle is a forensic principle that states that every contact leaves a trace. This principle was formulated by Dr. Edmond Locard, a French forensic scientist, in the early 20th century. According to the principle, whenever two objects come into contact with each other, there will be a transfer of materials between them. This transfer can include physical, biological, and chemical materials, such as fibers, hairs, DNA, and fingerprints. The principle is used in criminal investigations to link suspects to crime scenes, and to link objects found at the crime scene to suspects. By analyzing the materials exchanged during a contact, forensic scientists can establish a link between a suspect and a crime scene or victim.

The tort of contract interference is an intentional tort.

A tort of contract interference occurs when one party induces or persuades another party to breach a contract they have with a third party without just cause. This tort can take many forms, including enticing the breach of an employment contract, making a defamatory statement about a person's business to a customer or client, and interfering with the completion of a construction project by persuading a contractor not to perform their obligations.

The tort of contract interference is an intentional tort because it involves the deliberate act of persuading another party to breach a contract. This is in contrast to unintentional torts, which occur when harm is caused to another party without intent, such as in cases of negligence or strict liability.

You can learn more about contract interference at: brainly.com/question/15078648

#SPJ11

The Model Penal Code comes from the American Law Institute, an independent group of scholars, judges, and lawyers, and a widespread desire to reform the historical common law.

It is not directly related to international legal bodies surrounding criminal law reform or a string of key U.S. Supreme Court cases in the 1960s.

The Model Penal Code (or MPC) is just a model code developed by the American Legal Institute and published in 1962. Having followed the promulgation of the MPC, many states' criminal codes having undergone significant reforms, and many states' criminal codes were always based on the MPC.

To know more about Model Penal Code

https://brainly.com/question/28483426

#SPJ4

Jeff is liable for Ricardo's injuries under the theory of negligence per se, as he violated the state law that was designed to protect the public from dog attacks by allowing Maggie to be outside without a leash.

The theory of negligence is a legal principle that holds individuals or entities responsible for failing to act with reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to others.

To establish negligence, four elements must be proven: duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. In other words, a person or entity owed a duty to act with reasonable care, failed to do so, and that failure caused harm or injury to another person, resulting in damages that can be compensated.

Learn more about theory of negligence on:

https://brainly.com/question/30652890

#SPJ1

Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari all afford stability and predictability to the law. Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin term meaning “the thing speaks for itself” and it is a rule of evidence used in civil suits. The rule allows for an inference of negligence on the part of the defendant.

Stare decisis is a legal principle in which a court should follow its previous decisions when the same legal issues arise. Certiorari is a type of writ (order) used by a higher court to review the decision of a lower court. Stare decisis affords stability and predictability to the law.

The concept of stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It is the principle of determining points of law according to precedent. The term is applied in the sense that courts should follow the principles they had established earlier in making judgments.

It provides that a court should follow the rules and principles made by it in a previous decision that has similar facts and issues. This will provide stability and predictability to the law. It ensures the continuity of the law and helps in maintaining stability and consistency in its application.

Other options: Res ipsa loquitur: This is a legal doctrine that allows the court to presume negligence without the plaintiff providing direct evidence of negligence. This does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Clemency is the act of mercy or leniency shown by the authorities to a person who has committed a crime.

This is not a legal doctrine and does not afford stability and predictability to the law. Certiorari is a writ or order from a higher court to a lower court or tribunal directing it to send up the record of a particular case for review. It does not afford stability and predictability to the law.

To know more about Res ipsa loquitur, stare decisis, and certiorari, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12177870#

#SPJ11

When more actors become subjects and agents of international law, the development of global governance is eventually possible.

Global governance refers to the institutions, rules, norms, and processes that manage the interconnected global problems and promote collective action to address them. The rise of globalization and the increasing interdependence among states have made global governance more important than ever before.

Globalization has challenged the traditional concept of sovereignty and state-centered international law. The rise of non-state actors such as multinational corporations, international organizations, NGOs, and individuals have increased the complexity and diversity of global governance.

The traditional legal framework is no longer sufficient to address the transnational problems such as climate change, terrorism, human rights, public health, and cybersecurity. Therefore, the development of global governance has become a pressing need in the contemporary world.

More actors become subjects and agents of international law means that the scope and depth of global governance are expanding. It implies that more actors are participating in the creation and implementation of global norms and standards. It also means that more actors are being held accountable for their actions in the global arena. As a result, the legitimacy and effectiveness of global governance are enhanced.

However, the development of global governance is not without challenges. The diversity of actors and interests can lead to conflicts and power struggles. The lack of democratic accountability and transparency can also undermine the legitimacy of global governance. Therefore, the development of global governance requires a balance between inclusiveness and effectiveness, and between legitimacy and accountability.

To learn more about global governance here:

https://brainly.com/question/29498047#

#SPJ11

All of the above statement are true.

Rioting and routing require two or more people to accomplish, while incitement to riot only requires one person. Unlawful assembly requires two or more people, and magistrates or police officers who fail to disperse rioters may be violating the law.

Rioting and routing both require two or more people to coordinate their actions and work together to achieve their goals. Incitement to riot only requires one person to encourage others to engage in illegal activity.

Unlawful assembly requires two or more people to come together with the intent of committing a crime or disturbing the peace. Magistrates or police officers who fail to disperse rioters may be in violation of the law, as it is their duty to maintain order and peace in a given area.

To know more about illegal activity click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31109679#

#SPJ11

The laws that permit employers to automatically enroll employees in a defined contribution plan is "The Pension Protection Act" It allows employers to automatically enroll employees in a defined contribution plan. The correct option is C) Pension Protection Act

Define contribution plan: In a defined contribution plan, an employer contributes a specific amount or percentage of an employee's salary to a retirement account. The funds in the account are invested and grow over time. The employee then receives the accumulated funds when they retire.

There are several laws that govern defined contribution plans, but the Pension Protection Act is the one that permits employers to automatically enroll employees. Automatic enrollment means that an employee is automatically enrolled in the plan unless they opt out. This is designed to increase participation in the plan and help employees save more for retirement.

The other laws listed in the question are also relevant to defined contribution plans, but they do not specifically address automatic enrollment. The Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act (COBRA) provides certain rights to employees who lose their health benefits.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sets standards for pension plans, including defined contribution plans. The Internal Revenue Code provides tax rules for retirement plans, including defined contribution plans.

To learn more about defined contribution plan here:

https://brainly.com/question/30066472#

#SPJ11

The person who is accusing another person or group of wrongdoing and bringing a lawsuit to court is called the plaintiff.

The plaintiff is the person who initiates a legal action by filing a complaint or petition in a court of law against another person or entity. The plaintiff is the party who is seeking legal remedies or relief for some harm or injury that they have suffered, and they must prove their case through evidence and arguments presented in court.

The plaintiff is responsible for bearing the burden of proof in a civil lawsuit, and their ultimate goal is to obtain a favorable judgment or settlement that compensates them for their losses or addresses their legal grievances.

Learn more about The plaintiff

https://brainly.com/question/29213730

#SPJ4

A Day Reporting Center is a type of nonresidential, outpatient program based on a three-phase levels system where offenders report for a variety of treatment programs and random drug testing.

Day Reporting Centers are facilities where offenders report for a variety of treatment programs and random drug testing. It is a form of a non-residential, outpatient program that is structured and disciplined, similar to a boot camp, but less punitive.

In the United States, Day Reporting Centers (DRCs) have been used in recent years as an alternative to imprisonment for non-violent offenders, including drug addicts and alcoholics, as well as those convicted of property and other non-violent crimes.

The facilities are structured in a way that helps offenders develop personal responsibility and other important life skills, such as education, job readiness, and communication.  These centers have been considered an effective tool for the reduction of recidivism.

For more such questions on offenders, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28143259

#SPJ11

Answer:

Brainliest Please!

Explanation:

The VBS bank scandal in South Africa was one of the largest financial frauds in the country's history. The scandal involved senior executives at VBS Mutual Bank allegedly looting R1.8 billion ($130 million) from the bank's coffers. Following the scandal, various legislative controls were put in place to prevent similar occurrences in the future. Some of these controls include:

The Financial Sector Regulation Act (FSRA): This act was signed into law in August 2017, and it aims to provide a comprehensive and consistent regulatory framework for the financial sector. The FSRA established the Prudential Authority (PA) and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) as the two regulatory bodies responsible for supervising and regulating financial institutions and market conduct.

The Banks Amendment Act: This act was signed into law in January 2019 and aims to strengthen the governance and oversight of banks in South Africa. The act gives the PA and the FSCA more powers to regulate the banking sector, including the power to conduct investigations, impose fines and sanctions, and intervene in the affairs of banks.

The Public Investment Corporation Amendment Act: This act was signed into law in February 2019 and aims to improve governance at the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which manages the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) and other public funds. The act introduces various measures to enhance transparency and accountability at the PIC, including the appointment of independent directors and the separation of the roles of the CEO and the Chairperson.

The Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Act: This act was signed into law in April 2017 and aims to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The act introduces various measures to strengthen the financial intelligence capabilities of the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC), including the requirement for accountable institutions to identify and verify the identity of their clients.

Overall, these legislative controls aim to promote transparency, accountability, and good governance in the financial sector, and to prevent the recurrence of financial scandals like the VBS bank scandal.

Answer:

The VBS bank scandal was a case of financial corruption that involved the looting of over R2 billion from the VBS Mutual Bank in South Africa by its executives and other high-ranking officials. In response to the scandal, the South African government and regulatory bodies implemented several legislative controls to prevent similar abuses in the future.Some of the legislative controls that were put in place against the abuse of the VBS bank scandal include:The Financial Sector Regulation Act (2017): This act provides a legal framework for the regulation of financial institutions in South Africa, including banks, insurance companies, and other financial services providers. It aims to promote financial stability, protect consumers, and reduce the risk of financial misconduct.The Banks Amendment Act (2018): This act amends the Banks Act of 1990 and introduces new provisions to enhance the powers of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) to regulate and supervise banks. The act gives SARB greater powers to intervene in failing banks, protect depositors, and take action against banks that engage in risky or fraudulent activities.The Public Investment Corporation Amendment Act (2018): This act amends the Public Investment Corporation Act of 2004 and aims to strengthen the governance and oversight of the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which is responsible for managing public funds and investing in state-owned enterprises. The act introduces new requirements for the appointment of board members and mandates greater transparency and accountability in the PIC's operations.The Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Amendment Act (2018): This act amends the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act of 2004 and introduces new provisions to combat corruption and financial misconduct. The act increases the penalties for corruption and introduces new offenses, including the offense of "trading in influence."Overall, these legislative controls aim to prevent financial corruption and promote transparency, accountability, and good governance in the South African financial sector.

Under civil law, Mark is liable to Don for Don's injury because he acted in a way that caused harm. In this scenario, Mark pushed Don, which caused Don to fall and break his arm.

This is considered a tort, or wrongful act, since Mark acted in a way that resulted in harm to Don. The tort of negligence applies, which means that Mark acted in a careless or negligent way.

Under civil law, Don can bring a lawsuit against Mark to recover damages. He must prove that Mark acted in a negligent way and that Don suffered damages as a result. To do this, Don must show that Mark had a duty to act in a certain way, such as not pushing Don, that Mark breached that duty by pushing Don, and that Don suffered damages as a result.

If Don is successful in his lawsuit, he can recover damages from Mark. This could include medical bills, pain and suffering, and other related costs. He could also be compensated for his lost wages, if any, if he had to miss work due to his injury. Mark is liable for Don's injury under civil law, and Don can seek compensation for his damages in a civil lawsuit.

To know more about civil law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14788507#

#SPJ11

Answer:

video games

Explanation:

between that and carrying a weapon, which i obvious in everyone not just teens

Answer: Playing violent video games

Explanation: I took the test and got it right

Hope this helps