7. 238 divided by 1000 using powers of ten rules? I need help solving this

The marginal distribution of students that are in the 10th Grade is 28%

In probability theory and statistics, the marginal distribution of a subset of a collection of random variables is the probability distribution of the variables contained in the subset.

The P(10th grade) is determined by

∈P(A)= P( A and B₁) + P(A and B₂) + .....+ P(A and Bₓ) whereas B₁, B₂ and Bₓ are mutually exclusive and collective exhaustive events.

⇒100/870 + 32/870 + 108/870

= 240/870

reducing to lowest terms we have

8/29

≈28%

Learn more about marginal distribution on https://brainly.com/question/14310262

#SPJ1

The area of given regular hexagon is  509.22   square units.

For the given polygon,

Number of sides = 6

Since we know that,

A regular hexagon is a polygon with six equal sides and six equal angles. All of the sides and angles of a regular polygon are equal. A regular pentagon, for example, has 5 equal sides, whereas a regular octagon has 8 equal sides. When such prerequisites are not satisfied, polygons can take on the appearance of a variety of irregular forms. When six equilateral triangles are placed side by side, a regular hexagon is formed. The area of the regular hexagon is thus six times the size of the identical triangle.

Therefore,

It is called regular hexagon.

Since we know that,

Area of regular hexagon = (3√3/2)a²

Here we have a = 14

Therefore,

Area of given hexagon = (3√3/2)14²

                                       = 509.22   square units.

To learn more about polygons visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23846997

#SPJ1

The volume would be:

Volume = (1/3)(1 x 1)(2)

Volume ≈ 0.67 cubic feet

To determine a good ratio for comparing the actual pyramid to a piñata-sized pyramid, we need more information about the dimensions of the actual pyramid and the desired size of the piñata. Once we have that information, we can calculate the ratio by comparing the height, base, and volume of the two pyramids.

Assuming we have the necessary information, let's say the actual pyramid has a height of 10 feet and a base of 8 feet by 8 feet, and we want to create a piñata-sized pyramid with a height of 2 feet and a base of 1 foot by 1 foot. In this case, the ratio would be:

1: (2/10) or 1:5

To calculate the surface area of the piñata pyramid, we can use the formula:

Surface Area = (base x base) + 2(base x slant height)

Using the dimensions given, the surface area would be:

Surface Area = (1 x 1) + 2(1 x sqrt(0.5^2 + 2^2))

Surface Area ≈ 6.83 square feet

To calculate the volume of the piñata pyramid, we can use the formula:

Volume = (1/3)(base x base)(height)

Using the dimensions given, the volume would be:

Volume = (1/3)(1 x 1)(2)

Volume ≈ 0.67 cubic feet

Learn more about volume here:

https://brainly.com/question/28058531

#SPJ11

Answer: Andiswa is 14 and Jonas is 11

Answer:

Heya Let's Calculate.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's form equation.

Let the age of Jonas be x.

Then, the age of Andiswa is x+3

Equation=

x+x+3=25

⇒2x+3=25

⇒2x=25-3

⇒x=25/5

x=5

The linear function in the context of this problem is defined as follows:

y = 18 - 2x.

The slope-intercept equation for a linear function is presented as follows:

y = mx + b

The coefficients m and b represent the slope and the intercept, respectively, and are explained as follows:

When the input is of zero, the output is of 18, hence the intercept b is given as follows:

b = 18.

When the input increases by one, the output decreases by two, hence the slope m is given as follows:

m = -2.

Then the function is given as follows:

y = 18 - 2x.

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/15602982

#SPJ1

Given that x has a normal distribution with mean µ = 100 and standard deviation σ = 18, the probability P(x ≥ 120) is to be determined.

The standardized value of x can be calculated as follows: z = (x - µ) / σHere, x = 120, µ = 100, and σ = 18.∴ z = (120 - 100) / 18 = 1.11From the standard normal distribution table, the probability P(Z ≥ 1.11) = 0.1335 (approx.)Thus, the main answer is option A. 0.1335 Probability P(x ≥ 120) can be calculated by standardizing x as follows: z = (x - µ) / σwhere µ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

Here,

we have: µ = 100,

σ = 18, and

x = 120∴

z = (120 - 100) / 18

= 1.11

Now, we can calculate the probability P(x ≥ 120) by using the standard normal distribution table as follows

:P(x ≥ 120)

= P(Z ≥ 1.11)

From the standard normal distribution table, we get:

P(Z ≥ 1.11)

= 0.1335 (approx.)

Therefore, the probability P(x ≥ 120) is 0.1335 (approx.)Thus, the main answer is option A. 0.1335.

To know more about distribution  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/15090366

#SPJ11

The local extrema points of the function f(x,y) = 2x³ + xy² + 5x² + y² are (0, 0) and (-5/3, 0). Saddle points are (-1, 2) and (-1, -2).

The given function is :

f(x,y) = 2x³ + xy² + 5x² + y²

[tex]f_x(x,y)[/tex] = 6x² + y² + 10x

[tex]f_y(x,y)[/tex] = 2xy +2y

Let both the partial derivatives equal 0.

6x² + y² + 10x = 0

and

2xy +2y = 0

⇒ y(x + 1) = 0

⇒ y = 0 and x = -1

Substitute x = -1 into the equation of 6x² + y² + 10x = 0.

6(-1)² + y² + 10(-1) = 0

-4 + y² = 0

y = +2 or -2

Substitute y = 0 into the equation of 6x² + y² + 10x = 0.

equation of 6x² + 10x = 0.

6x = -10

x = -5/3 or x = 0

So the critical points are :

(-1, 2), (-1, -2), (0, 0) and (-5/3, 0).

[tex]f_{xx}(x,y)[/tex] = 12x + 10

[tex]f_{yy}(x,y)[/tex] = 2x + 2

[tex]f_{xy}(x,y)[/tex] = 2y

Now,

D = [tex]f_{xx}(x,y)f_{yy}(x,y)-[f_{xy}(x,y)]^2[/tex]

So at (0, 0) :

D > 0 and [tex]f_{xx}[/tex] > 0, so it is a local minimum point.

At (-5/3, 0) :

D > 0 and [tex]f_{xx}[/tex] < 0, so it is a local maximum point.

At (-1, 2) :

D < 0 and it is saddle point.

At (-1, -2) :

D < 0 and it is saddle point.

Learn more about Saddle Points here :

https://brainly.com/question/11013588

#SPJ4

The series   [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}}$[/tex] converges. The given series converges.

To test this series for convergence  [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}}$[/tex] You could use the Limit Comparison Test, comparing it to the series

[tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n}$[/tex]  

where [tex]p=1 > 0$.[/tex]

Now, we will use the Limit Comparison Test to determine if the given series converges or diverges.According to the Limit Comparison Test,

if [tex]$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n}[/tex]  =[tex]c$[/tex] where [tex]$c > 0$[/tex],

then both [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$[/tex]

and [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n$[/tex] converge or both diverge.

That is  , [tex]$\bullet$[/tex] If  [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n$[/tex] converges,

then  [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$[/tex]  converges[tex].$\bullet$[/tex]

If [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n$[/tex] diverges,

then [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$[/tex]  diverges.

Let [tex]$a_n = \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}}$[/tex] and

[tex]$b_n = \frac{1}{n}$[/tex]

Then, [tex]$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n}[/tex] =  [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}} \cdot \frac{n}{1}[/tex]

= [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{n^3 + n}{n^{10}}[/tex]

=[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n^6}+ \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n^9}[/tex]

=[tex]0$.[/tex]

Since [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = 0$,[/tex]

which is a finite positive number.

To know more about series convergence visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29258536

#SPJ11

The limit of a(n) / b(n) is infinity, and b(n) is a known convergent series, we can conclude that the original series [tex]\sum (1/n^2 + 1/n)[/tex] also converges. The statement "Converges" is the correct answer.

To test the series [tex]\sum(1/n^2 + 1/n)[/tex] for convergence, we can use the Limit Comparison Test.

We will compare it to the series Σ(1/n),

which is a known series that converges.

Let's denote the original series as [tex]a(n) = 1/n^2 + 1/n[/tex],

and the comparison series as b(n) = 1/n.

We need to calculate the limit of the ratio of the terms of the two series as n approaches infinity:

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} a(n)/b(n)\\ \\ \lim_{n \to \infty} [(1/n^2 + 1/n) / (1/n)]\\\\ \lim_{n \to \infty} (n+1)[/tex]

As n approaches infinity, the limit of (n + 1) is infinity.

Since the limit of a(n) / b(n) is infinity, and b(n) is a known convergent series, we can conclude that the original series [tex]\sum(1/n^2 + 1/n)[/tex] also converges.

Therefore, the statement "Converges" is the correct answer.

To know more about convergent series, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32549533

#SPJ11

The value of d is 8 units.

Given is a setup of a circular wheel with radius AC of 5 units and a tangent AB of 12 units, we need to find the value of d,

We know that the tangents are perpendicular to the circle,

So, ΔCAB is a right triangle, using the Pythagoras theorem,

BC² = AB² + AC²

BC² = 5² + 12²

BC² = 169

BC = 13

d = 13-5

d = 8

Hence the value of d is 8 units.

Learn more about tangent click;

https://brainly.com/question/30951227

#SPJ1

a. The values of a and b are;

b.ff(x) = x implies x² - x - 2 = 0.

To find the value of a and b, we use the given information to form two equations in a and b:

f(b) = b gives b/(b-a) = b,

a = b/2

f(2a) = 2a gives (b/(2a-a)) = 2a

b = 4a²

To show that ff(x) = x implies x² - x - 2 = 0, we substitute ff(x) into the equation:

ff(x) = x

f(f(x)) = x

f(b/(x-a)) = x

b/(b/(x-a)-a) = x

b(x-a)/(b-(x-a)a) = x

bx - ba = bx - x² + a²x - a²a

x² - x - 2 = 0

Learn more about functions at: https://brainly.com/question/17043948

#SPJ1

The direction of the rescue boat, obtained by representing the location of the sailboat using vectors is N 8.7° E

A vector is a quantity that posses the properties magnitude and direction.

The vector form of the motion of the sailboat can be presented as follows;

d = 8 × sin(12)·i + 8 × cos(18)·j

The next direction of the sailboat = 3 miles south = -3 j

Therefore, the distance and direction of the sailboat is; 8 × sin(12)·i + 8 × cos(18)·j + -3 j

The direction the rescue boat has to leave from the dock in order to intercept the sailboat is; arctan(3 + 8 × cos(18))/( 8 × sin(12)) ≈ 81.26°

The direction relative to the North = 90° - 81.26° ≈ 8.7°

The direction of the rescue both is N 8.7° E

Learn more on the vectors here: https://brainly.com/question/30216531

#SPJ1

hello

the answer is:

Sin A = BC/AB ----> Sin 32° = 14/AB ----> AB = 26.42

AB² = BC² + AC² ----> (26.42)² = (14)² + AC² ---->

AC² = (26.42)² - (14)² ----> AC² = 502.0164 ---->

AC = 22.40

OR

Cos A = AC/AB ----> Cos 32° = AC/(26.42) ---->

AC = 22.40

A model is a representation of reality or a real-life situation. The correct answer is E.

The correct answer is "model."A model is a representation of reality or a real-life situation. It can be used to simulate or describe the behavior of a system, process, or phenomenon.

Models are often used in various fields such as science, engineering, economics, and computer science to understand and analyze complex systems or make predictions about real-world scenarios.

A model is a simplified or abstract representation of a real-life situation or system. It captures the essential features or characteristics of the system while ignoring or simplifying irrelevant details. Models can be physical, conceptual, or mathematical in nature.

Learn more about model at https://brainly.com/question/14638586

#SPJ11

To calculate the limits below, we can use basic limit rules and arithmetic operations.

lim_(x->2) [f(x) + g(x)]

= lim_(x->2) f(x) + lim_(x->2) g(x) (by limit laws)

= 1 + (-4)

= -3

We can use the limit laws to add the limits of f(x) and g(x) since they are both approaching the same point, 2. Then, we can simply add the values of the limits to get the limit of their sum.

lim_(x->2) [g(x) - f(x)h(x)]

= lim_(x->2) g(x) - lim_(x->2) [f(x)h(x)] (by limit laws)

= -4 - [lim_(x->2) f(x)] [lim_(x->2) h(x)] (by limit laws and arithmetic operations)

= -4 - 1(0)

= -4



Again, we can use the limit laws to subtract the limit of f(x) multiplied by h(x) from the limit of g(x). To find the limit of f(x) multiplied by h(x), we can use the product rule for limits and multiply the limits of f(x) and h(x) together.

lim_(x->2) [g(x)/f(x)]

= [lim_(x->2) g(x)] / [lim_(x->2) f(x)] (by limit laws)

= -4 / 1

= -4



We can use the limit laws to divide the limit of g(x) by the limit of f(x) since they are both approaching the same point, 2.



The limits of [f(x) + g(x)], [g(x) - f(x)h(x)], and [g(x)/f(x)] as x approaches 2 are -3, -4, and -4, respectively.

To know more about divide visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/15381501

#SPJ11

When assessing whether a transformation has succeeded in meeting the assumptions of the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), there are several steps you can follow:

Understand the assumptions: Familiarize yourself with the assumptions of ANOVA. The key assumptions include:

a. Normality: The residuals (the differences between observed and predicted values) should follow a normal distribution.

b. Homogeneity of variances: The variability of the residuals should be constant across all levels of the independent variable(s).

c. Independence: The observations should be independent of each other.

Visual inspection: Plot the residuals against the predicted values or the independent variable(s). Check for patterns or systematic deviations from randomness. Look for indications of non-normality, heteroscedasticity (unequal variances), or any other violations of assumptions.

Statistical tests: Perform appropriate statistical tests to assess the assumptions. Common tests include:

a. Normality tests: You can use tests like the Shapiro-Wilk test or the Anderson-Darling test to assess normality of residuals.

b. Homogeneity of variances tests: Levene's test or Bartlett's test can be used to assess homogeneity of variances.

c. Independence assumption: In experimental designs, independence is often assumed. However, in some cases, you may need to consider specialized tests or modeling techniques to address dependency.

Effect of transformation: If the assumptions are violated, consider applying transformations to the data. Common transformations include logarithmic, square root, or reciprocal transformations. Apply the transformation to the response variable and rerun the ANOVA. Repeat steps 2 and 3 to assess whether the transformed data meet the assumptions.

Assess the transformed data: Repeat the visual inspection and statistical tests on the transformed data to determine if the assumptions have been met. If the assumptions are still not satisfied, you may need to explore alternative statistical techniques or consider a more complex model.

Interpretation: Once you have satisfied the assumptions, you can interpret the results of the ANOVA. Be cautious and consider the limitations of your analysis, as transformations may affect the interpretation of the original data.

Remember that the appropriateness of a transformation depends on the specific context and data. It's always good practice to consult with a statistician or an expert in the field to ensure the validity of your analysis.

Learn more about Variance here:

https://brainly.com/question/14116780

#SPJ11

n the given scenario, we are studying a sample of 11 flights at Denver International Airport, where 82% of recent flights have arrived on time. We need to calculate probabilities related to the number of flights being on time.

(a) To find the probability that all 11 flights were on time, we multiply the probability of each flight being on time (82%) by itself 11 times, since the events are independent.

(b) To find the probability that exactly 9 flights were on time, we use the binomial probability formula. The formula is P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k), where n is the number of trials (11 flights), k is the number of successful outcomes (9 flights on time), and p is the probability of success (82%).

(c) To find the probability that 9 or more flights were on time, we sum up the probabilities of having exactly 9, 10, or 11 flights on time. This can be calculated using the binomial probability formula for each individual case and then adding them together.

(d) To determine if it would be unusual for 10 or more flights to be on time, we can compare the probability of 10 or more flights being on time with a certain threshold. If the probability is below the threshold (e.g., 0.05), we can consider it unusual.

By applying these calculations and rounding the probabilities to at least four decimal places, we can determine the probabilities and assess the likelihood of different scenarios related to the number of flights being on time.

Learn more about probability: brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Rounding to three decimal places, the correlation coefficient between cost and miles is approximately -0.398.

To calculate the correlation coefficient between cost and miles, we need to first calculate the mean of the cost and miles, as well as the standard deviations of each variable. Then we can use the formula for the correlation coefficient, which is:

correlation coefficient (r) = Σ((x_i - x_mean) * (y_i - y_mean)) / (n * x_std * y_std)

Let's calculate it step by step:

Calculate the mean of cost (x) and miles (y):

x_mean = (171 + 397 + 270 + 88 + 438) / 5 = 272.8

y_mean = (941 + 3093 + 2003 + 433 + 3019) / 5 = 1581.8

Calculate the standard deviation of cost (x) and miles (y):

x_std = sqrt(((171 - 272.8)^2 + (397 - 272.8)^2 + (270 - 272.8)^2 + (88 - 272.8)^2 + (438 - 272.8)^2) / 5) ≈ 131.150

y_std = sqrt(((941 - 1581.8)^2 + (3093 - 1581.8)^2 + (2003 - 1581.8)^2 + (433 - 1581.8)^2 + (3019 - 1581.8)^2) / 5) ≈ 968.294

Calculate the correlation coefficient (r):

r = ((171 - 272.8) * (941 - 1581.8) + (397 - 272.8) * (3093 - 1581.8) + (270 - 272.8) * (2003 - 1581.8) + (88 - 272.8) * (433 - 1581.8) + (438 - 272.8) * (3019 - 1581.8)) / (5 * 131.150 * 968.294)

r ≈ -0.398

Rounding to three decimal places, the correlation coefficient between cost and miles is approximately -0.398.

After performing the calculations, we find that the correlation coefficient between cost and miles is approximately -0.398. This means that there is a weak negative correlation between the cost of flights and the distance in miles. In other words, as the distance increases, the cost tends to slightly decrease.

Learn more about Costs

at brainly.com/question/31259207

#SPJ11

Answer: The mid-point of the given line segment is (4,2,10).

Step-by-step explanation: We can find the mid-point of the line segment given to us by using the formula:

x=[tex]\frac{x_{1}+x_{2} }2}[/tex]

y=[tex]\frac{y_{1}+y_{2}}{2}[/tex]

z=[tex]\frac{z_{1}+z_{2}}{2}[/tex]

where x,y, and z are the coordinates of the mid-point of the line segment.

Now, [tex]{x_{1}[/tex]=2,[tex]{x_{2}[/tex]=6,[tex]{y_{1}[/tex]=0,[tex]{y_{2}[/tex]=4,[tex]{z_{1}[/tex]=-6,[tex]{z_{2}[/tex]=26

By substituting the values in the above formula we get,

x=(2+6)/2=4

y=(0+4)/2=2

z=(-6+26)/2=10

Thus, the mid-point of the given line segment is: (4,2,10)

To learn more about coordinate systems:

https://brainly.ph/question/5853904

The values of the missing parts are;

WX = 2.2

<X = 24. 6 degrees

<W = 65.4 degrees

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have that;

WX² = 2² + 1²

Find the value

WX² = 4 + 1

Add the values

WX = √5

WX = 2.2

Using the sine identity, we get;

sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse

substitute the values

sin W = 2/2.2

Divide the values

sin W = 0. 9090

Find the inverse

W = 65. 4 degrees

Then, we get;

X = 180 - 90 - 65.4

Subtract the values

X = 24. 6 degrees

Learn about triangles at: https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The value of u* in problem min x2 – (x1 – 2)3 + 3 subject to X2 > 1  is 2.

To find the value of u* in the given problem, we can utilize the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions.

First, let's set up the Lagrangian function:

L(x, u) = x2 - (x1 - 2)3 + 3 - u(x2 - 1)

The KKT conditions are as follows:

Stationarity condition: ∇f(x) - u∇g(x) = 0

∂L/∂x1 = -3(x1 - 2)² = -u∂g/∂x1

∂L/∂x2 = 2x2 - u = -u∂g/∂x2

Primal feasibility condition: g(x) ≤ 0

x2 - 1 > 0

Dual feasibility condition: u ≥ 0

Complementary slackness condition: u * (x2 - 1) = 0

From the stationarity condition, we can deduce that 2x2 - u = 0. Combining this with the complementary slackness condition, we have two possible cases:

Case 1: u = 0

From 2x2 - u = 0, we get x2 = 0. However, this contradicts the constraint x2 > 1, so this case is not feasible.

Case 2: x2 - 1 = 0

In this case, we have x2 = 1, and from 2x2 - u = 0, we find u = 2.

Therefore, the value of u* in this problem is 2.

To know more about min refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15161624

#SPJ11

answer is option C

AC =~= BD

Answer: AC = BD this is because these two are of the same and exact equal lengths

The expected number of times one needs to flip a fair coin to get two consecutive heads is 6.

To find the expected number of times one needs to flip a fair coin to get two consecutive heads, we can use the concept of conditional probability.

Let E be the expected number of flips needed to get two consecutive heads.

On the first flip, there is a probability of 1/4 of getting two consecutive heads. If this does not happen, we have to start over and flip the coin again.

On the second flip, there is a probability of 1/4 of getting two consecutive heads, but we have already used one flip, so the expected number of additional flips needed is E.

Therefore, we can write the following equation:

E = (1/4)2 + (1/2)(E+1) + (1/4)(E+2)

E = (1/2)( 1 + E + 1 + E/2 + 1)

E = (1/2)(3 + 3E/2)

E = 3/2 + 3E/4

E/4 = 3/2

E = 6

Therefore, the expected number of times one needs to flip a fair coin to get two consecutive heads is 6.

Learn more about consecutive heads here

https://brainly.com/question/28453685

#SPJ4

(a) To find the area of the region R bounded by the curves y = -x^2 - 3x + 10 and y = 5 + x, we need to find the points of intersection of the two curves and integrate the difference in y-values.

First, let's find the points of intersection by setting the two equations equal to each other: -x^2 - 3x + 10 = 5 + x.  Rearranging and simplifying: x^2 + 4x + 5 = 0. The quadratic equation has no real solutions, which means the two curves do not intersect. Since there are no points of intersection, the region R does not exist, and the area of R is equal to 0. (b) To find the exact volume of the solid of revolution obtained when R is rotated 2π radians about the x-axis using the disk/washer method, we need to integrate the cross-sectional areas of the disks or washers formed.The region R is bounded by the curves y = -x^2 - 3x + 10 and y = 5 + x. To determine the limits of integration, we need to find the x-values where the curves intersect.

Setting the two equations equal to each other: -x^2 - 3x + 10 = 5 + x. Rearranging and simplifying: x^2 + 4x + 5 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation, we find the solutions: x = -2 ± √(4 - 4(1)(5)) / 2. x = -2 ± √(-16) / 2. Since the discriminant is negative, the quadratic equation has no real solutions. Therefore, the curves y = -x^2 - 3x + 10 and y = 5 + x do not intersect. As there are no points of intersection, the volume of the solid of revolution is 0.(c) To find the exact volume of the solid of revolution obtained when R is rotated 2π radians about the line x = 3 using the method of cylindrical shells, we need to integrate the product of the circumference of the shells and their heights. The region R is bounded by the curves y = -x^2 - 3x + 10 and y = 5 + x. The line x = 3 is the axis of rotation. To determine the limits of integration, we need to find the y-values where the curves intersect.

Setting the two equations equal to each other: -x^2 - 3x + 10 = 5 + x. Rearranging and simplifying: x^2 + 4x + 5 = 0. Solving this quadratic equation, we find the solutions: x = -2 ± √(4 - 4(1)(5)) / 2. x = -2 ± √(-16) / 2. Since the discriminant is negative, the quadratic equation has no real solutions. Therefore, the curves y = -x^2 - 3x + 10 and y = 5 + x do not intersect. As there are no points of intersection, the volume of the solid of revolution is 0.

To learn more about curves click here: brainly.com/question/29736815

#SPJ11

The given sequent "((P-Q) & (RS)) ⊢ =(P&R) Qvs" is proved.

To prove the sequent ((P-Q) & (RS)) ⊢ =(P&R) Qvs, we will use natural deduction rules.

1. Assume ((P-Q) & (RS)) as the premise.

2. From (1), apply the ∧-elimination rule to get (P-Q).

3. From (1), apply the ∧-elimination rule to get (RS).

4. Assume P as a sub-derivation.

5. From (4), apply the →-intro rule to get (P→R).

6. From (5) and (2), apply the →-Elim rule to get R.

7. From (6), apply the ∧-intro rule to get (P&R).

8. Assume Q as a sub-derivation.

9. From (9) and (3), apply the →-intro rule to get (Q→S).

10. From (10) and (2), apply the →-Elim rule to get S.

11. From (11), apply the ∨-intro rule to get (Qvs).

12. From (7) and (12), apply the =-intro rule to get =(P&R) Qvs.

13. Discharge the assumptions made in steps 4 and 8.

14. Finally, discharge the assumption made in step 1.

Therefore, we have proven the sequent ((P-Q) & (RS)) ⊢ =(P&R) Qvs.

To know more about sequent refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31967799#

#SPJ11

The probability that the sum of the throw is divisible by 4 but greater than 7 is 17 / 36.

There are 36 possible outcomes when two dice are tossed.

The sum of the dice can be any number from 2 to 12. The sum is divisible by 4 when the sum is 4, 8, or 12. The sum is greater than 7 when the sum is 8 , 9 , 10 , 11, or 12.

There are 3 ways to get a sum of 4, 3 ways to get a sum of 8, 2 ways to get a sum of 12, 4 ways to get a sum of 9, 4 ways to get a sum of 10, and 1 way to get a sum of 11.

The probability of getting a sum that is divisible by 4 or greater than 7 is:

= ( 3 + 3 + 2 + 4 + 4 + 1 ) / 36

= 17 / 36

Find out more on probability at https://brainly.com/question/23955312

#SPJ1

The factored form of the quadratic equation 4x²+ 100x + 255 = 0 is (2x + 17)(2x + 15) = 0.

We have the equation:

4x² + 100x + 255 = 0

Now, factorizing

4x² + 34x + 30x + 255 = 0

Now, we group the terms and factor by grouping:

(4x² + 34x) + (30x + 255) = 0

2x(2x + 17) + 15(2x + 17) = 0

(2x + 17)(2x + 15) = 0

Now, we set each factor equal to zero and solve for x:

2x + 17 = 0 --> 2x = -17 --> x = -17/2

2x + 15 = 0 --> 2x = -15 --> x = -15/2

The factored form of the quadratic equation 4x²+ 100x + 255 = 0 is (2x + 17)(2x + 15) = 0 and the solutions for x are x = -17/2 and x = -15/2.

Learn more about Equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

The equation of the plane passing through the point (1,5,4) is 23y - z = 111

Given data ,

To find the equation of the plane passing through the point (1, 5, 4) and perpendicular to the line x = 1 + 7t, y = t, z = 23t, we can use the following approach:

To find the direction vector of the line, which is the coefficients of t in each coordinate. In this case, the direction vector is (7, 1, 23).

Since the plane is perpendicular to the line, the normal vector of the plane will be orthogonal to the direction vector. We can take the direction vector and find two other vectors that are orthogonal to it to determine the normal vector.

The two orthogonal vectors to (7, 1, 23) is to take the cross product of (7, 1, 23) with two arbitrary vectors that are not parallel to each other. Let's choose the vectors (1, 0, 0) and (0, 1, 0).

Cross product 1: (7, 1, 23) x (1, 0, 0)

= (0, 23, -1)

Cross product 2: (7, 1, 23) x (0, 1, 0)

= (-23, 0, -7)

So, the two vectors that are orthogonal to the direction vector (7, 1, 23).

Now, the equation of the plane using the normal vector and the given point (1, 5, 4).

The equation of the plane is given by the dot product of the normal vector and the vector connecting the given point to any point (x, y, z) lying on the plane:

(0, 23, -1) · (x - 1, y - 5, z - 4) = 0

Expanding the dot product, we have:

0(x - 1) + 23(y - 5) + (-1)(z - 4) = 0

23(y - 5) - (z - 4) = 0

Hence , the equation of the plane passing through the point (1, 5, 4) and perpendicular to the line x = 1 + 7t, y = t, z = 23t is 23y - z = 111.

To learn more about equation of plane click :

https://brainly.com/question/32163454

#SPJ4

The complete question is attached below:

Find the equation of the plane which passes through the point (1,5,4) and is perpendicular to the line x=1+7t, y=t, z=23t

The predicted y value for each of the following x scores are:

To find the predicted y value (y) for each of the given x score using the regression equation y = 2x - 7, we substitute the x values into the equation and calculate the corresponding y values.

For x = 0:

y = 2(0) - 7

= -7

The predicted y value for x = 0 is -7.

For x = 1:

y = 2(1) - 7

= -5

The predicted y value for x = 1 is -5.

For x = 3:

y = 2(3) - 7

= -1

The predicted y value for x = 3 is -1.

For x = -2:

y = 2(-2) - 7

= -11

The predicted y value for x = -2 is -11.

So, the predicted y values for the given x scores are:

For x = 0, y = -7

For x = 1, y = -5

For x = 3, y = -1

For x = -2, y = -11

Learn more about regression equation at https://brainly.com/question/13168714

#SPJ11

The slope of the line that passes through the points (7, 5) and (1, 6) is -1/6

First, we shall list out the given parameters. This is given below:

The slope of the line can be obtained as follow:

m = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

m = (6 - 5) / (1 - 7)

m = 1 / -6

m = -1/6

Thus, we can conclude from the above calculation that the slope of the line is -1/6

Learn more about slope of line:

https://brainly.com/question/3493733

#SPJ1

Answer:

H shot R

explain:

Because the R is next to the hoop