A study conducted at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond indicates that many older individuals can shed insomnia through psychological training. A total of 72 insomnia sufferers averaging age 67 years old completed eight weekly sessions of cognitive-behavior therapy. After the therapy, 22 participants enjoyed a substantially better night’s sleep. Calculate the sample proportion of insomnia sufferers who did not enjoy a better night’s sleep after the therapy. Round your answer to three decimal places, if necessary.

Lets take the variable x for the son.

Son: x

Dad: 3x

Mom: 3x-4

THREE years ago:

Son: x-3

Dad: 3x-3

Mom: 3x-4 -3

so, 3x-7

SUM=54

(x-3)+(3x-3)+(3x-7)=54

x-3+3x-3+3x-7=54

7x-13=54

7x=54+13

7x=67

so , x=67/7

x= 9.5

now lets see for the dad:

3x= 3*9.5

=28.5

Finally for the mom:

3x-4= 3*9.5 -4

= 28.5-4

= 24.5

The man's age is 32, his wife's age is 28.

Let's use algebra to solve this problem.

Let's represent the man's age as "M", his wife's age as "W", and their child's age as "C".

From the first sentence of the problem, we know that:

M = W + 4

From the second sentence, we know that:

M = 3C

Finally, from the third sentence, we know that the sum of their ages three years ago was 54:

(M-3) + (W-3) + (C-3) = 54

Substituting M = W + 4 and M = 3C into the third equation, we get:

(W+4-3) + (W-3-3) + (1/3M - 3) = 54

Simplifying this equation, we get:

2W + (1/3)(W+4) - 12 = 54

Multiplying both sides by 3 to eliminate the fraction, we get:

6W + W + 4 - 36 = 162

Combining like terms, we get:

7W - 32 = 162

Adding 32 to both sides, we get:

7W = 194

Dividing both sides by 7, we get:

W = 28

Substituting W = 28 into M = W + 4, we get:

M = 32

Finally, substituting M = 3C into the equation, we get:

32 = 3C

C = 32/3

Therefore, the man's age is 32, his wife's age is 28.

To know more about age visit:

brainly.com/question/28686134

The study aimed to provide insights into the potential effects of rhGH and rhIGF-I, both separately and in combination, on the immune function of elderly individuals, as indicated by the immune response to tetanus toxoid immunization.

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 7-week administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor (rhIGF-I), both separately and in combination, on immune function in elderly female rhesus monkeys. The researchers used the response to immunization with tetanus toxoid as an assay to measure the in vivo function of the immune system.

The study design likely involved the following steps:

Selection of elderly female rhesus monkeys as the study subjects: The researchers chose female monkeys of advanced age to represent the elderly population.

Administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH): The researchers administered rhGH to a group of monkeys for a period of 7 weeks. This hormone is known to stimulate growth and metabolism.

Administration of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor (rhIGF-I): Another group of monkeys received rhIGF-I, a hormone that mediates the effects of GH, for the same duration.

Combination treatment: A third group of monkeys received both rhGH and rhIGF-I simultaneously during the 7-week period.

Immunization with tetanus toxoid: After the 7-week treatment period, all monkeys were immunized with tetanus toxoid, which is a vaccine used to induce an immune response against tetanus.

Measurement of immune response: The researchers assessed the immune function by measuring the response of the monkeys' immune systems to the tetanus toxoid immunization. They likely examined parameters such as antibody production or T-cell response.

Data analysis: The researchers analyzed the immune response data to determine the effects of rhGH, rhIGF-I, and their combination on the immune function of the elderly female rhesus monkeys.

The study aimed to provide insights into the potential effects of rhGH and rhIGF-I, both separately and in combination, on the immune function of elderly individuals, as indicated by the immune response to tetanus toxoid immunization.

To learn more about immunization visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19975865

#SPJ11

The relation that is a function is given as follows:

Bottom left graph.

A graph represents a function if it has no vertically aligned points, that is, each value of x is mapped to only one value of y. Vertically aligned points mean that a value of x is mapped to multiple values of y, that is, a single input is mapped to multiple outputs which disqualify the relation as a function.

Hence the bottom left graph is the only one with a relation representing a function, as a vertical line would not cross the graph of the function more than once no matter where it was plotted.

More can be learned about graphs and functions at https://brainly.com/question/12463448

#SPJ1

A proportional relationship is a type of linear relationship where the ratio of two variables is constant.

The number of hours studied (x) and the corresponding grade on a test (y) for a group of students. We observe that the grades are directly proportional to the number of hours studied. To write an equation to describe this proportional relationship, we can use the form y = kx, where k is the constant of proportionality.

To find the value of k, we can use any data point in the dataset. Let's say that when a student studies for 5 hours, they get a grade of 80. We can substitute these values into the equation:

[tex]80 = k[/tex] × [tex]5[/tex]

To solve for k, we can divide both sides by 5:

[tex]k = 80 / 5[/tex]

[tex]= 16[/tex]

Therefore, the equation to describe this proportional relationship is:

[tex]y = 16x[/tex]

This means that for every additional hour studied, the grade increases by 16 points.

To learn more about proportional relationship visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18855170

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

How to write an equation to describe a proportional relationship?

Therefore, if Isabel plans to drive inequality more than 25 miles, Company B will be more expensive than Company A. If she plans to drive 25 miles or less, Company A will be more expensive.

Let's start by setting up an inequality to represent the mileages for which Company A charges less than Company B.

For Company A, the cost is a flat fee of $90, regardless of the number of miles driven.

For Company B, the cost depends on the number of miles driven. The initial fee is $75, and then there is an additional charge of $0.60 for every mile driven. So, the total cost for Company B can be represented by the equation:

Cost(B) = 0.60m + 75

here m is the number of miles driven.

We want to find the mileages for which Company A charges less than Company B. In other words, we want to find the values of m for which:

Cost(A) < Cost(B)

Substituting in the expressions for the costs, we get:

90 < 0.60m + 75

Simplifying and solving for m, we get:

15 < 0.60m

25 < m

Learn more about inequality visit: brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ4

a) The solution to the initial-value problem is: y^3 = 3xr^3 + 2.

b) The solution to the initial-value problem is: x^2 y + (1/2) y^3 = (1/2) r^2 + 3/2.

c) The solution to the initial-value problem is: xr - ye^y = z ln|x| + 1.

(a) We can start by separating the variables and integrating both sides with respect to x and y:
xy^2 dy = y^3 - r^3 dx
Integrating both sides:
(1/3) y^3 = xr^3/3 + C
Using the initial condition y(2) = 2:
(1/3) (2)^3 = 2r^3/3 + C
C = 2/3
Thus, the solution to the initial-value problem is:
y^3 = 3xr^3 + 2

(b) Similar to part (a), we can separate the variables and integrate both sides with respect to x and y:
x^2 + 2y^2 dy = ry dx
Integrating both sides:
x^2 y + (1/2) y^3 = (1/2) r^2 + C
Using the initial condition y(-1) = 1:
(-1)^2 (1) + (1/2) (1)^3 = (1/2) r^2 + C
C = 3/2
Thus, the solution to the initial-value problem is:
x^2 y + (1/2) y^3 = (1/2) r^2 + 3/2

(c) We can start by multiplying both sides by dx and integrating:
(x-yey) dr = zey dy/x
Integrating both sides:
xr - ye^y = z ln|x| + C
Using the initial condition y(1) = 0:
1r - 0e^0 = z ln|1| + C
C = 1
Thus, the solution to the initial-value problem is:
xr - ye^y = z ln|x| + 1

Learn more about "initial value problem": https://brainly.com/question/31041139

#SPJ11

Answer: x +

Step-by-step explanation:

the correct expression is:

5 x (8 + 4)

when expanded, this would give you:

5x8 + 5x4

so the blanks should be filled with x and +

The coupon rate for the semi-annual bond is approximately 11.96%.

Given the information provided, we have the following details:

- Par value: $1,000
- Maturity: 10 years
- Current price: $887
- YTM (Yield to Maturity): 10.9%

To solve for the coupon rate, we can use the bond pricing formula:

Bond Price = (C * (1 - (1 + r/2)^(-2n))) / (r/2) + (Par Value / (1 + r/2)^(2n))

Where:
- Bond Price = $887
- C = Coupon payment per period (which we need to find)
- r = YTM / 100 = 0.109
- n = Maturity in years = 10

Plugging in the given values:

$887 = (C * (1 - (1 + 0.109/2)^(-2*10))) / (0.109/2) + ($1,000 / (1 + 0.109/2)^(2*10))

Now, we can solve for the coupon payment, C:

C = (($887 * 0.109/2) - ($1,000 / (1 + 0.109/2)^(2*10))) / (1 - (1 + 0.109/2)^(-2*10))

C ≈ $59.80

Since this is a semi-annual bond, the annual coupon payment would be:

Annual Coupon Payment = C * 2 = $59.80 * 2 = $119.60

Finally, to find the coupon rate, we can divide the annual coupon payment by the par value:

Coupon Rate = (Annual Coupon Payment / Par Value) * 100 = ($119.60 / $1,000) * 100 = 11.96%

So, the coupon rate for the semi-annual bond is approximately 11.96%.

To learn more about Coupon Rate

https://brainly.com/question/30145053

#SPJ11

Based on the information provided, it appears that there are 4 independent variables included in the regression model.

This is indicated by the "regression" row in the ANOVA table, which shows that there are 4 degrees of freedom (df) for the regression. This is determined by the degrees of freedom (df) for the regression, which is 4. The df for regression represents the number of independent variables in the model.

A statistical method called regression links a dependent variable to one or more independent (explanatory) variables. A regression model can demonstrate whether changes in one or more of the explanatory variables are related to changes in the dependent variable.

More on regression: https://brainly.com/question/14983410

#SPJ11

Answer:

The perimeter of the quarter circle is 24.997 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Given, the radius of the circle = 7 cm

The perimeter of the circle = 2πr

and perimeter of the quarter circle = 2r + C

where r is the radius and C is the circumference of the sector of a circle

Circumference of the sector =  ∅/360°(2πr)

                                           C  = 90°/360°(2×3.142×7)

                                            C = 10.997 cm

perimeter of the quarter circle = 2r + C  

                                                   = 2×7 + 10.997

                                                   = 24.997 cm

The perimeter of the quarter circle will be 24.997 cm

learn more about circles here :

brainly.com/question/29142813

The pizza parlor offers 2^48, or approximately 281 trillion, different pizzas.

To calculate the total number of different pizzas offered, we need to consider all possible combinations of pizza sizes and toppings.

For each pizza size, there are 12 options for toppings (including no toppings). Therefore, the total number of pizzas for a single size is 2^12 (2 options for each of the 12 toppings). Since there are four different sizes, the total number of different pizzas offered by the parlor is:

2^12 x 2^12 x 2^12 x 2^12 = 2^(12+12+12+12) = 2^48

Thus, the pizza parlor offers 2^48, or approximately 281 trillion, different pizzas.

To learn more about pizza, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/7602584

#SPJ11

The absolute value equation that has a solution set of 3 and 7 is |x-5|= 2.

We have,

The solution sets of the absolute value equation are given as x = {3, 7}.

So, Mean of solution

x₁= (7+3)/2

= 10/2

= 5

and, x₂ = (7-3)/2

= 4/2

= 2

Now, the absolute value equation

|x - x₁| - x₂ = 0

|x -5|-2 = 0

|x-5|= 2

Learn more about absolute value equation here:

brainly.com/question/2166748

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer to your problem is, A. 10

Step-by-step explanation:

So first add up all the total number of ‘ X ‘

Which is:

4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10

Technically 10 is our answer.

Thus the answer to your problem is, A. 10

Not a 100% sure

Answer:

5, 8, 8, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10

The median of this data set is 8.5, so the correct answer is B.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since there are 10 observations, we are looking for the number halfway between the two middle observations (observations #5 and #6) when the data are arranged in order. Here, observation #5 is 8, and observation #6 is 9, so the median of this data set is (8 + 9)/2 = 8.5. B is the correct answer.

We are 98% confident that the mean of the true population y lies between 10.8 and 13.4.

To construct the confidence interval, we first need to calculate the critical value of t using the given values of C and n. Since C = 0.98, we can find the level of significance as α = 1 - C = 0.02.

Using a t-table or calculator, the critical value of t for a two-tailed test with 14 degrees of freedom and

[tex]\frac{\alpha}{2} = 0.01[/tex] is approximately 2.977.

Next, we can calculate the sample standard deviation as s = σ/√n = [tex]\frac{0.95}{\sqrt{15}}= 0.245[/tex].

Then, we can use the formula for a confidence interval for the population mean using the t-distribution:
(y ± t)×[tex]\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

Substituting the given values, we get:

(12.1 ± 2.977)×[tex]\frac{0.245}{\sqrt{15}}[/tex]

Simplifying and rounding to one decimal place, we get the confidence interval: (10.8, 13.4)

Therefore, we are 98% confident that the true population mean y lies between 10.8 and 13.4.

To know more about the standard deviation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31488498

#SPJ11

Answer:2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Since with each fraction, the value increases by an increment of 0.0833333333333, which we can figure out by subtracting the smaller values by the values that come directly after them in the string of fractions, we can find that the next value in the list is 2/3, which is 7/12 + 0.0833333333333.

Estimating the square root of the number -√7 gives -2 and -2.6

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

-√7

To estimate the number is to approximate the number

When the square root of 7 is evaluated, we have

-√7 = -2.64575131106

Approximate to the nearest integer

-√7 = -2

Approximate to the nearest tenth.

-√7 = -2.6

Hence, the estimates are -2 and -2.6

Read more abot expression at

brainly.com/question/15775046

#SPJ1

Answer:

74% is about 75%, or 3/4.

57 is about 60.

So 74% of 57 is about 3/4 of 60, or 45.

74% of 57 is .74 × 57 = 42.18, so the estimate seems reasonable

Answer:

42.18

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{57*74}{100} = 42.18[/tex]

Answer:

a first

Step-by-step explanation:

because I just don't

To solve for I and Q in this electric circuit, we can use the equations for the charge and current in a series RL circuit with a capacitor:

Q = CV(1 - e^(-t/RC))
I = (E/R)e^(-t/tau) + (Q/R) where tau = L/R

Plugging in the given values, we have:

Q = (100 micro farads)(100 volts)(1 - e^(-t/(20 ohms)(0.05 henry)))
I = (100 volts/20 ohms)e^(-t/(0.05 henry/20 ohms)) + Q/20 ohms

Using the initial conditions Q = 0 and I = 0 at t = 0, we can simplify the equations to:

Q = 100 micro farads * 100 volts * (1 - e^(-t/1 millisecond))
I = (100 volts/20 ohms)e^(-t/1 millisecond)

So at t = 1 millisecond, we have:

Q = 100 micro farads * 100 volts * (1 - e^(-1))
 ≈ 42.36 microcoulombs
I = (100 volts/20 ohms)e^(-1)
 ≈ 1.831 amperes

Therefore, at t = 1 millisecond, the charge on the capacitor is about 42.36 microcoulombs and the current in the circuit is about 1.831 amperes.

https://brainly.com/question/31564505

#SPJ11

Without additional evidence that shows Stew-topia's pricing strategy was intended to harm competition, it cannot be conclusively determined whether Stew-topia is guilty of predatory pricing.

To prove that Stew-topia engaged in predatory pricing, Larry would need to provide evidence that Stew-topia priced stew below average variable cost with the specific intention of driving 2 Live Stew out of business, or that the owner of Stew-topia threatened the owner of 2 Live Stew to keep him from matching the price cut. Simply observing that both 2 Live Stew and Stew-topia lowered their prices to $2.00 for a bowl of stew and that Stew-topia always lowered its price first is not enough to conclusively determine whether Stew-topia is engaging in predatory pricing.

Predatory pricing is a strategy used by a dominant firm in a market to deliberately set prices below the average variable cost (AVC) of production in order to drive competitors out of business and reduce competition in the long run. To prove that Stew-topia engaged in predatory pricing, Larry would need to show evidence that Stew-topia priced its stew below its average variable cost with the specific intent of driving 2 Live Stew out of business. This would require detailed financial data and documentation from Stew-topia, such as production costs, pricing decisions, and internal communications that demonstrate their predatory intent.

Alternatively, Larry would need to provide evidence that Stew-topia used anti-competitive tactics, such as threatening the owner of 2 Live Stew to prevent them from matching the price cut or engaging in anti-competitive agreements or collusion. This would require concrete proof, such as emails, recordings, or witnesses, that demonstrate Stew-topia's anti-competitive behavior.

Simply observing that both 2 Live Stew and Stew-topia lowered their prices and that Stew-topia always lowered its price first is not enough to prove predatory pricing. There could be other reasons for the price cuts, such as seasonal promotions, cost reductions, or competitive pressures.

Therefore, without additional evidence that shows Stew-topia's pricing strategy was intended to harm competition, it cannot be conclusively determined whether Stew-topia is guilty of predatory pricing.

To learn more about Stew-topia's here:

brainly.com/question/15862604#

#SPJ11

The PM of the circle is 6 in.

Since the diameter of the circle divide the circle into two equal parts. We can say:

PM = MQ

Applying the Intersecting Chord Theorem (When two chords intersect each other inside a circle, the products of their segments are equal). That is:

SM * RM = PM * MQ

SM * RM = PM²

SM = 13 - 4

SM = 9 in

RM = 4 in

Substituting:

SM * RM = PM²

9 * 4 = PM²

PM² = 36

PM = √36

PM = 6 in

Learn more about circle on:

https://brainly.com/question/31533348

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The statements that are true about the triangle are

a) m∠5 + m∠6 = 180°

b) ∠ 2+ ∠ 3 = ∠ 6

c) m∠2 + m∠3 + m∠5 = 180°

Given data ,

Let the triangle be represented as ΔABC

Now , An exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of the opposite interior angles.

For Exterior ∠ 1 we have

∠ 1 = ∠ 5 + ∠ 3 ( Exterior angle Property of Triangle )

Similarly,

For Exterior ∠ 4 we have

∠ 4 = ∠ 5 + ∠ 2 ( Exterior angle Property of Triangle )

Similarly,

For Exterior ∠ 6 we have

∠ 6 = ∠ 2 + ∠ 3 ( Exterior angle Property of Triangle )

From the triangle sum property , we get

Ina triangle sum of the measures of angles is equal to 180°

m∠2 + m∠3 + m∠5 = 180°

Hence , the triangle is solved

To learn more about triangles click :

https://brainly.com/question/16739377

#SPJ1

The complete question is attached below :

A triangle is shown with its exterior angles. The interior angles of the triangle are angles 2, 3, 5. The exterior angle at angle 2 is angle 1. The exterior angle at angle 3 is angle 4. The exterior angle at angle 5 is angle 6. Which statements are always true regarding the diagram? Select three options.
m∠5 + m∠3 = m∠4
m∠3 + m∠4 + m∠5 = 180°
m∠5 + m∠6 =180°
m∠2 + m∠3 = m∠6
m∠2 + m∠3 + m∠5 = 180°

The series after solving the following term f(x) = [tex]e^{-2x}[/tex] is given as:

[tex]e^{-2x}[/tex] = 1 - 2x + 2x² - 4/3x³ + 2/3x⁴ - 4/15x⁵+....|x| < ∞.

The fundamental concepts in mathematics are series and sequence. A series is the total of all components, but a sequence is an ordered group of items in which repeats of any kind are permitted. One of the typical examples of a series or a sequence is a mathematical progression.

By using the formulae to solve issues, one may gain a deeper understanding of the principles. The main distinction between them and sets is that in a sequence, certain terms might appear again in different locations. A series can be finite or infinite in length and has length equal to the number of terms.

Given f(x) = [tex]e^{-2x}[/tex], center x = 0

f(x) = [tex]e^{-2x}[/tex] = [tex]1 - 2x + \frac{(2x)^2}{2!} +\frac{(2x)^3}{3!} +\frac{(2x)^4}{4!} +\frac{(2x)^5}{5!} +.....|x|[/tex]

[tex]e^{-2x}[/tex] = 1 - 2x + 4([tex]\frac{x^2}{2}[/tex]) - 8([tex]\frac{x^3}{6}[/tex]) + 16([tex]\frac{x^4}{24}[/tex]) - 35([tex]\frac{x^5}{100}[/tex])+.....|x| < ∞

[tex]e^{-2x}[/tex] = 1 - 2x + 2x² - 4/3x³ + 2/3x⁴ - 4/15x⁵+....|x| < ∞

Learn more about Series:

https://brainly.com/question/24643676

#SPJ4

The solution to the given differential equation is:

[tex]$\frac{1}{2}x^4y + \frac{2}{3}x^3y^2 = C$[/tex]

To solve the given differential equation:

[tex]$(x^2 + y^2 + xy)dx + (xy)dy = 0$[/tex]

We will first check whether this is an exact differential equation or not.

[tex]$\frac{\partial M}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial }{\partial y}(x^2 + y^2 + xy) = 2y + x$[/tex]

[tex]$\frac{\partial N}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial }{\partial x}(xy) = y$[/tex]

Since [tex]$\frac{\partial M}{\partial y} \neq \frac{\partial N}{\partial x}$[/tex], this is not an exact differential equation.

Next, we will check if this differential equation is solvable using an integrating factor.

[tex]$\frac{1}{xy}(x^2 + y^2 + xy)dx + dy = 0$[/tex]

Let us assume the integrating factor as [tex]$u = u(x)$[/tex]

Multiplying both sides of the differential equation with the integrating factor, we get:

[tex]$\frac{1}{y}(x^2 + y^2 + xy)u(x)dx + u(x)dy = 0$[/tex]

Now, we can see that this is an exact differential equation.

[tex]$\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(\frac{1}{y}(x^2 + y^2 + xy)u(x)\right) = \frac{xu(x)}{y}$[/tex]

[tex]$\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(u(x)\right) = \frac{xu(x)}{y}$[/tex]

Solving this differential equation, we get:

[tex]$\ln |u(x)| = \frac{1}{2}\ln(x^2y^2) = \ln(xy)$[/tex]

[tex]$u(x) = xy$[/tex]

Multiplying the integrating factor to the original differential equation, we get:

[tex]$(x^3y + x^2y^2 + x^2y^2)dx + (x^2y^2)dy = 0$[/tex]

[tex]$(x^3y + 2x^2y^2)dx + (x^2y^2)dy = 0$[/tex]

This is now an exact differential equation and can be solved by finding the potential function:

[tex]$\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(\frac{1}{2}x^4y + \frac{2}{3}x^3y^2\right) = x^3y + 2x^2y^2$[/tex]

[tex]$\frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(\frac{1}{2}x^4y + \frac{2}{3}x^3y^2\right) = x^2y^2$[/tex]

Therefore, the potential function is [tex]$\frac{1}{2}x^4y + \frac{2}{3}x^3y^2 = C$[/tex], where C is the constant of integration.

Hence, the solution to the given differential equation is:

[tex]$\frac{1}{2}x^4y + \frac{2}{3}x^3y^2 = C$[/tex]

To learn more about Multiplying visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23536361

#SPJ11

The final value is 4 (mod5)

Hence, 17^342 ≡ 2^342 ≡ 4 (mod5).

To find 5^903 (mod60), we can use Euler's totient function. Since 60 = 2^2 × 3 × 5, we have φ(60) = 2^1 × 3^1 × 4 = 24. Therefore, we can use Euler's theorem to write:

5^24 ≡ 1 (mod60)

Raising both sides to the power of 37, we get:

5^(24*37) ≡ 1^37 ≡ 1 (mod60)

So 5^888 ≡ 1 (mod60).

Now, we can write:

5^903 = 5^888 * 5^15

Since 5^888 ≡ 1 (mod60), we just need to find 5^15 (mod60).

To do this, we can use the repeated squaring method. Writing 15 in binary form, we have:

15 = 1111 (in binary)

So we can compute:

5^1 ≡ 5 (mod60)

5^2 ≡ 25 (mod60)

5^4 ≡ 25^2 ≡ 25 (mod60)

5^8 ≡ 25^2 ≡ 25 (mod60)

Therefore:

5^15 ≡ 5^8 * 5^4 * 5^2 * 5^1 ≡ 25 * 25 * 25 * 5 ≡ 25 (mod60)

Hence, 5^903 ≡ 5^15 ≡ 25 (mod60).

To find 17^342 (mod5), we can use the fact that 17 ≡ 2 (mod5). Therefore:

17^342 ≡ 2^342 (mod5)

Using the repeated squaring method again, we can compute:

2^1 ≡ 2 (mod5)

2^2 ≡ 4 (mod5)

2^4 ≡ 1 (mod5)

Therefore:

2^342 ≡ 2^2 * (2^4)^85 ≡ 4 * 1^85 ≡ 4 (mod5)

Hence, 17^342 ≡ 2^342 ≡ 4 (mod5).

To learn more about Raising visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28568593

#SPJ11

Substituting n = -1 in the given expression, we get:

n² + n² + n² for n = -1

= (-1)² + (-1)² + (-1)²

= 1 + 1 + 1

= 3

Therefore, n² + n² + n² for n = -1 is equal to 3.

As per the given equation, the stone was dropped from a height of approximately 1.08 feet or about 13 inches.

The velocity of a free-falling object is an important concept in physics, and it is defined by the equation:

v = 2gh

In this equation, v represents the velocity of the object in feet per second, g represents the acceleration due to gravity in feet per second per second, and h represents the distance that the object has fallen in feet.

Suppose a stone is dropped from a certain height and strikes the water with a velocity of 138 feet per second. Our task is to estimate the height from which the stone was dropped.

To solve this problem, we need to rearrange the equation to solve for h. We start by dividing both sides of the equation by 2g:

h = v/2g

Substituting the given values, we get:

h = 138/2(32) = 1.078125

To know more about equation here

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

Answer:

(4, -1)

Hope you can understand what I did