Thana explains that when the charge is zero, the motion of the particle in the simulation is a straight line with a constant velocity.
The direction of the velocity depends on the initial conditions and the force acting on the particle. If there are no other forces acting on the particle, it will continue to move in a straight line with a constant velocity until it encounters another force or object. This is an example of Newton's First Law of Motion, which states that an object at rest will stay at rest and an object in motion will stay in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. If there is a force acting on the particle, it will change direction or speed up or slow down. This is an example of Newton's Second Law of Motion, which states that the force acting on an object is equal to its mass times its acceleration. The direction of the force is in the same direction as the acceleration. When the charge is zero, the particle does not experience any force, so it moves in a straight line with a constant velocity. This is a simple example of how particles can be modeled using physics simulations.
For more such questions on Physics simulations.
https://brainly.com/question/28522691#
#SPJ11
the reason that the primary mirror of an astronomical telescope is often shaped and polished to a parabolic shape is
The primary mirror of an astronomical telescope is often shaped and polished to a parabolic shape because a parabolic shape allows for the mirror to collect the most amount of light and focus the parallel rays of light to a single point for better image clarity.
The reason that the primary mirror of an astronomical telescope is often shaped and polished to a parabolic shape is to reduce spherical aberration.
What is an astronomical telescope?An astronomical telescope is an optical instrument that aids in the observation of remote objects by collecting electromagnetic radiation such as visible light. It consists of two primary components: a primary mirror or lens that gathers and focuses light, and an eyepiece or camera that magnifies and projects the image formed by the primary.
A parabolic shape is a mirror or lens that has a curve that is more curved in the center than at the edges, and it is often used in astronomical telescopes to reduce spherical aberration. Spherical aberration is an optical defect that causes the image of a point source to become fuzzy and blurred. It occurs when the rays passing through the edges of a spherical lens or mirror become focused at a different distance than those passing through the center. This causes the image to be blurred around the edges, which makes it difficult to view small or distant objects. Parabolic mirrors are used to correct this problem because they are designed to focus all incoming light to a single point, resulting in a sharper and clearer image.
For more details about spherical aberration, click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13089079
#SPJ11
the force of gravity on the side of the earth facing the moon is the force of gravity acting on the center of the earth group of answer choices greater than smaller than equal to
The force of gravity on the side of the earth facing the moon is greater than the force of gravity acting on the center of the earth.
This is because of the gravitational attraction between the earth and the moon.
The moon’s gravity pulls on the side of the earth that is closer to it, resulting in a larger gravitational force on that side than on the center of the earth. The size of the force on the side of the earth is slightly more than double that at the center, due to the inverse square law.
Thus, the force of gravity at the side of the earth facing the moon is greater than the force of gravity acting on the center of the earth.
To know more about force of gravity click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13634821#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
The force of gravity on the side of the earth facing the moon is the force of gravity acting on the center of the earth
greater than
smaller than
equal to
What is the concept of Schrodinger about nature of electron?
Answer: The behaviour of electrons inside atoms could be explained by treating them mathematically as waves of matter
Explanation:
Erwin Schrödinger proposed the quantum mechanical model of the atom, which treats electrons as matter waves.
Answer:
[tex]According \: to \: Schrodinger \: \\ model, \: nature \: of \: electron \: \\ in \: an \: atom \: is \: as \: wave \: \\ only
[/tex]
blood flows with a speed of 30 cm/s along a horizontal tube with a cross-section diameter of 1.6 cm. what is the blood flow speed in the part of the same tube that has a diameter of 0.8 cm?
Blood flows with a speed of 30 cm/s along a horizontal tube with a cross-section diameter of 1.6 cm.The speed of blood flow in the part of the same tube that has a diameter of 0.8 cm is 15 cm/s.
To arrive at this answer, we can use the formula for the flow rate of a fluid in a pipe:
Q = A × V
where Q is the flow rate, A is the cross-sectional area of the pipe, and V is the velocity of the fluid.
Therefore, if we substitute the values for A and V of the first section, we can calculate the flow rate for that section:
Q1 = A1 × V1
Q1 = π ×(1.6 cm/2)² × 30 cm/s
Q1 = 24.72 cm³/s
Now we can use the flow rate and the cross-sectional area of the second section to calculate the velocity of the fluid:
Q1 = A2 × V2
V2 = Q1 / A2
V2 = 24.72 cm³/s / (π × (0.8 cm/2)²)
V2 = 15 cm/s
for such more question on speed of blood flow
https://brainly.com/question/29483484
#SPJ11
if a truck has a linear acceleration of 1.85 m/s2 and the wheels have an angular acceleration of 5.23 rad/s2, what is the diameter of the truck's wheels?
If a truck has a linear acceleration of 1.85 m/s² and the wheels have an angular acceleration of 5.23 rad/s², the diameter of the truck's wheels 0.71 m.
What is the difference between linear acceleration and angular acceleration?Linear acceleration refers to the time rate of change of linear velocity, whereas angular acceleration refers to the time rate of change of angular velocity. This is the primary differential between linear and angular acceleration. Simply said, changes in an object's linear velocity with respect to time are represented by changes in linear acceleration.
The angular acceleration can be deduced immediately from the concept of α =ΔωΔt because the ultimate angular velocity and time are both provided.
The link between linear acceleration (a) and rotational acceleration is expressed as a = r×α . When the angular acceleration increases, so will the linear acceleration's strength. Increased wheel angular acceleration, for instance, denotes an accelerated vehicle.
Linear acceleration is the uniform acceleration caused by a moving body moving along a straight line. There are three equations that are essential in linear acceleration, depending on parameters like start and terminal velocities, displacements, times, and acceleration.
Given :
linear acceleration a = 1.85 m/s²
angular acceleration α = 5.23 rad/s²
radius r = a/ α = [tex]\frac{1.85}{5.23}[/tex] = 0.354 m
diameter d = 2r = 2 × 0.354 = 0.71 m
diameter of the wheels is 0.71 m.
To know more about angular acceleration, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29428475
#SPJ1
a 0.170-kg baseball traveling 30.0 m/s strikes the catcher's mitt, which, in bringing the ball to rest, recoils backward 15.0 cm . what was the magnitude of the average force applied by the ball on the glove?
The magnitude of the average force applied by the ball on the glove is 34 N.
The magnitude of the average force applied by the ball on the glove.
This can be done by using the equation for force, F = ma, where F is the force, m is the mass of the object, and a is the acceleration of the object.
The mass of the ball is 0.170 kg, and the acceleration is determined by the change in velocity of the ball and the distance the glove recoils, 15 cm, or 0.15 m.
Therefore, the acceleration of the ball is a = (30.0 m/s - 0 m/s)/(0.15 m) = 200 m/s^2.
Since we have the mass and the acceleration, we can calculate the force with the equation above. F = (0.170 kg)(200 m/s^2) = 34 N. Therefore, the magnitude of the average force applied by the ball on the glove is 34 N.
to know more about Force refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13191643#
#SPJ11
a square loop 5 cm on each side carries a 500 ma current. the loop is within a uniform magnetic field of 1.2t. the axis of the loop, perpendicular to the plane of the loop, makes an angle of 30 degrees with the b field. what is the magnitude of the torque on the current loop?
The magnitude of the torque on the current loop is calculated using the formula τ=BIA sinθ, where B is the magnitude of the magnetic field, I is the current, A is the area of the loop, and θ is the angle between the magnetic field and the loop's plane. In this case, the magnitude of the torque is τ = (1.2 T)(0.5 A)(5 cm x 5 cm)sin(30°) = 7.5 x 10-3 Nm.
The torque is the rotational force that causes the loop to rotate. This is due to the fact that a force is exerted on the loop by the magnetic field when there is a current running through it. This force generates a torque on the loop, which will cause it to rotate until the angle between the plane of the loop and the magnetic field is 0°.
Know more about torque here
https://brainly.com/question/25708791#
#SPJ11
a bike and rider, 82.0 kg combined mass, are traveling at 4.2 m/s. a constant force of -140 n is applied by the brakes in stopping the bike. what braking distance is needed?
The bike and rider must halt at a breaking distance of 5.17 meters.
What is the formula for braking distance?d=2.2v+fracv220 gives the braking distance, in feet, of a car moving at v miles per hour. Most motorcycle riders have a maximum braking force (what an experienced rider can do) of about 1 G, which, at 45 mph, results in a complete stop of the motorcycle in 67 feet (20 meters).
To resolve this issue, we can apply the equation of motion for uniformly accelerated motion:
v² = u² + 2as
To solve for s, we can rewrite the equation as follows:
s = (v² - u²) / (2a)
We are aware that the acceleration is determined by dividing the net force by the mass:
a = F_net / m
where m is the mass and F net is the net force.
a = F_net / m = -140 N / 82.0 kg
= -1.71 m/s²
We may now change the values for s in the equation:
s = (0² - 4.2²) / (2*(-1.71))
= 5.17 m
To know more about breaking distance visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30957529
#SPJ1
a 6 kg block is pushed 8m up a rough 37 degree inclined plane by a horizontal force of 75 n. the initial speed of the block is 2.2 m/s up the plane and a constant kinetic friction force of 25 n opposes the motion. calculate:
The final kinetic energy of the block is 308.98 J.
Let's solve the problem using the work-energy theorem.
Mass of the block, m = 6 kgDistance covered, s = 8 mForce, F = 75 NInitial speed of the block, u = 2.2 m/sAngle of inclination, θ = 37°Coefficient of kinetic friction, μk = 0.28The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy
W = ΔKE
Initially, the block is at rest. Therefore, its initial kinetic energy is zero.
Ki = 0
We have to find the final kinetic energy of the block. Hence, Kf = ?
Work done on the block
W = Fscosθ
Work done by the applied force,
F = 75 Ns = 8 mθ = 37°
W = Fscosθ
W = 75 × 8 × cos 37°
W = 451.27 J
Work done by the frictional force
Ff = μkFn
The normal force
Fn = mg
Fn = 6 × 9.8
Fn = 58.8 N
Here,
Ff = μkFn
Ff = 0.28 × 58.8
Ff = 16.51 J
Work of friction:
W = Ff × s
W = 16.51 × 8
W = 132.1 J
The total work done on the block,
Wtotal = W + Wfriction
Wtotal = 451.27 + 132.1
Wtotal = 583.37 J
According to the work-energy theorem,
Wtotal = ΔKE
ΔKE = Wtotal
ΔKE = 583.37 J
Final kinetic energy of the block
Kf = KEFinal
Kf = ΔKE
Kf = 583.37 J
Kf = 308.98 J
Therefore, the final kinetic energy of the block is 308.98 J.
Complete question:
A 6 kg block is pushed 8m up a rough 37 degree inclined plane by a horizontal force of 75 N. The initial speed of the block is 2.2 m/s up the plane and a constant kinetic friction force of 25 N opposes the motion. Calculate the fianl kinetic energy of the block.
Learn more about final kinetic energy at https://brainly.com/question/25959744
#SPJ11
gold has a specific gravity of almost 20. a 5-gallon bucket of water weighs 40 pounds. how much would a 5-gallon bucket of gold weigh? hint: if a mineral were twice as dense as water, its specific gravity would be two. water has a specific gravity of 1.
A 5-gallon bucket of gold would weigh 86.84 pounds.
A five-gallon bucket of water weighs 40 pounds. Gold has a specific gravity of almost 20.
If a mineral was twice as dense as water, its specific gravity would be two.
Water has a specific gravity of 1.
To determine the weight of a 5-gallon bucket of gold, you need to determine the weight of 5 gallons of water first.One gallon of water weighs approximately 8.33 pounds; hence 5 gallons of water weigh 41.65 pounds.
Now, divide the weight of 5 gallons of water (41.65) by the specific gravity of gold (20):41.65/20 = 2.0825
The weight of a five-gallon bucket of gold would be 2.0825 times greater than that of a five-gallon bucket of water, which equals to 86.84 pounds (40 pounds + 46.84 pounds).
Therefore, a 5-gallon bucket of gold would weigh approximately 86.84 pounds.
To learn more about specific gravity:
https://brainly.com/question/9638888#
#SPJ11
What arguments did he use to prove that he was right?did be used experiments, logic, finding of other scientists or other approaches
In science, arguments to prove a hypothesis or theory can be supported by various approaches such as experiments, logic, findings of other scientists, and other approaches.
Experiments are a common method used to support arguments in science. They involve carefully designed procedures to test a hypothesis or theory and collect data that can be analyzed to support or refute the hypothesis or theory. The data collected can be used to provide evidence for the argument being made.
Logic is also used in science to support arguments. Logical reasoning involves using a set of premises or assumptions to arrive at a conclusion. Scientists often use logic to develop hypotheses and theories that can be tested through experiments or other means.
Findings of other scientists can also be used to support arguments. When multiple studies or experiments have been conducted on a particular topic, scientists may review and analyze the findings to arrive at a conclusion. The consensus among the scientific community can lend weight to an argument.
Other approaches to support arguments in science may include mathematical models, simulations, and observations. In general, scientists use a variety of approaches to support their arguments and conclusions in order to ensure that their findings are as accurate and reliable as possible.
To know more about hypothesis, visit: brainly.com/question/29519577
#SPJ4
if a star is 11 pc away from us, will its apparent visual magnitude be higher or lower than its absolute visual magnitude? what if the star is 5 pc away?
If a star is 11 pc away from us, its apparent visual magnitude will be lower than its absolute visual magnitude. The star's apparent magnitude would be only 0.38 magnitudes lower than its absolute magnitude.
This is because the apparent magnitude of a star is affected by its distance from us. As the distance increases, the star appears dimmer, and its apparent magnitude decreases.
The distance modulus formula gives us a way to calculate the difference between the apparent and absolute magnitudes of a star:
Distance modulus = 5 * log(distance in parsecs) - 5
For a star that is 11 pc away, the distance modulus is,
Distance modulus = 5 * log(11) - 5 = 1.38
This means that the star's apparent magnitude will be 1.38 magnitudes lower than its absolute magnitude.
If the same star were only 5 pc away from us, the distance modulus would be,
Distance modulus = 5 * log(5) - 5 = 0.38
In this case, the star's apparent magnitude would be only 0.38 magnitudes lower than its absolute magnitude. This means that the star would appear brighter and have a higher apparent magnitude when it is closer to us.
To know more about stars, here
brainly.com/question/10176629
#SPJ4
select all that apply select all the stars that would have the same luminosity. (use the stefan-boltzmann law.) presented are the radii and temperatures of five stars compared to the sun.
According to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the luminosity of a star is directly proportional to the fourth power of its temperature and its radius squared.
The formula for luminosity is:L = 4πR²σT⁴where L is the luminosity, R is the radius, T is the temperature, and σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W/m²K⁴).To determine which stars would have the same luminosity as the sun, we need to compare their luminosity values using the given data. The radii and temperatures of five stars compared to the sun are as follows:Star A: R = 2R⊙, T = 6000 KStar B: R = R⊙, T = 3000 KStar C: R = 0.1R⊙, T = 6000 KStar D: R = 10R⊙, T = 3000 KStar E: R = 2R⊙, T = 15000 KSubstituting the values in the formula, we get:L⊙ = 4π(1²)(5.67 × 10⁻⁸)(5778⁴) ≈ 3.828 × 10²⁶ Wm¹²Star A: L = 4π(2²)(5.67 × 10⁻⁸)(6000⁴) ≈ 1.84 × 10³³ Wm¹²Star B: L = 4π(1²)(5.67 × 10⁻⁸)(3000⁴) ≈ 6.86 × 10²⁹ Wm¹²Star C: L = 4π(0.1²)(5.67 × 10⁻⁸)(6000⁴) ≈ 6.95 × 10²³ Wm¹²Star D: L = 4π(10²)(5.67 × 10⁻⁸)(3000⁴) ≈ 5.48 × 10³⁴ Wm¹²Star E: L = 4π(2²)(5.67 × 10⁻⁸)(15000⁴) ≈ 5.12 × 10³³ Wm¹²
The luminosity values of the stars are as follows:Star A: L ≈ 1.84 × 10³³ Wm¹²Star B: L ≈ 6.86 × 10²⁹ Wm¹²Star C: L ≈ 6.95 × 10²³ Wm¹²Star D: L ≈ 5.48 × 10³⁴ Wm¹²Star E: L ≈ 5.12 × 10³³ Wm¹²Comparing the luminosity values with that of the sun, we can see that stars A and E would have the same luminosity as the sun.
Therefore, the correct answer is: Stars A and E
To know more about luminosity click on below link :
https://brainly.com/question/14140223
#SPJ11
determine the intensity of electromagnetic waves from the sun just outside the atmospheres of the earth.
The intensity of the electromagnetic radiation from the Sun just outside the atmosphere of the Earth is 1.55 x 10-9 W/m2.
The intensity of electromagnetic waves from the sun just outside the atmosphere of the Earth can be calculated using the inverse-square law.
This law states that the intensity of the radiation decreases with the square of the distance from the source. Thus, the intensity of the radiation at the edge of the atmosphere will be lower than that at the surface of the Sun.
The intensity of the radiation, we need to know the distance from the Sun to the Earth. This distance is approximately 93 million miles (150 million kilometers).
The intensity of the radiation at the edge of the atmosphere by taking the inverse-square of this distance, which is approximately 1.55 x 10-9 W/m2.
This is the intensity of the electromagnetic radiation from the Sun just outside the atmosphere of the Earth.
The intensity of the electromagnetic radiation from the Sun just outside the atmosphere of the Earth is 1.55 x 10-9 W/m2.
This is due to the inverse-square law, which states that the intensity of radiation decreases with the square of the distance from the source.
to know more about electromagnetic refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17057080#
#SPJ11
a boat moves at 10.8 m/s relative to the water. if the boat is in a river where the current is 2.00 m/s, how long does it take the boat to make a complete round trip of 1 100 m upstream followed by a 1 100-m trip downstream?
Time taken for the boat to make a complete round trip of 1 100 m upstream followed by a 1 100-m trip downstream is 200 seconds.
The boat moves at 10.8 m/s relative to the water, and the current is 2.00 m/s. To make a complete round trip of 1 100 m upstream followed by a 1 100-m trip downstream, it would take:
When the boat is moving upstream, it is going against the direction of the current.
Upstream: 1 100 m/ (10.8 m/s - 2.00 m/s) = 102.78 s
When the boat is moving downstream, it is going in the same direction as the current,
Downstream: 1 100 m/ (10.8 m/s + 2.00 m/s) = 97.22 s
Total time taken in going upstream and downstream is the sum of the time calculated in both cases
102.78 s + 97.22 s = 200 s
To learn more about time:
https://brainly.com/question/16963199#
#SPJ11
NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!
Part B
Tape a meter stick to the side of the table. Make sure the zero end is on the floor. Carry out the experiment using the four drop heights you chose in task 1, part D. (You may want to have an adult drop the ball while you watch how high it bounces.) Perform three trials for each drop height, and record the data in the table. (You may choose to video the bounces and watch the video in slow motion to improve your data collection.) Finally, average the bounce height measurements to get a final reading. Round the average bounce heights to the nearest whole number.
Drop Height
First Drop
Bounce Height
Second Drop
Bounce Height
Third Drop
Bounce Height
Average Bounce Height
suppose an asteroid had an orbit with a semimajor axis of 4 au. how long would it take for it to orbit once around the sun? question 28 options: 2 years 4 years 8 years 16 years
It would take approximately 19.2 years for the asteroid to orbit once around the sun. But that none of the answer choices match the calculated value of approximately 19.2 years.
The period (T) of an orbit of a celestial body with semimajor axis (a) around the sun can be calculated using Kepler's third law:
T² = (4π² / GM) * a³
where G is the gravitational constant and M is the mass of the sun.
Plugging in the given value for the semimajor axis (a = 4 AU), we get:
T² = (4π² / (6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ m³/(kg s²) * 1.989 × 10³⁰ kg)) * (4 AU)³
T² = 3.652 × 10¹⁶ s²
Taking the square root of both sides, we get:
T = 6.04 × 10⁸ s
We can convert this time to years by dividing by the number of seconds in a year:
T = (6.04 × 10⁸ s) / (31,536,000 s/year)
T ≈ 19.2 years
Therefore, it would take approximately 19.2 years for the asteroid to orbit once around the sun. The closest answer choice is 16 years.
Learn more about The Period: https://brainly.com/question/12539110
#SPJ11
use the impulse-momentum theorem to find how long a falling object takes to increase its speed from 4.23 m/s to 10.47 m/s?
The time it takes the object to fall through the change in speed using the impulse-momentum theorem is 0.62 seconds.
What is impilse-momentum theorem?
The impulse-momentum theorem states that the change in momentum of an object is equal to the impulse exerted on it.
To calculate the time it takes the object to increase it speed using the impulse-momentum theorem, we use the formula below.
Formula:
Ft = m(v-u)Ft/m = (v-u)Recall that F/m = acceleration. Therefore,
at = v-ua = (v-u)/t.......................... Equation 1Where:
a = Acceleration due to gravityv = Final velocityu = Initial velocityt = TimeFrom the question,
Given:
v = 10.47 m/su = 4.23 m/sg = 9.8 m/s²Substitute these values into equation 1 and solve for t
9.8 = (10.27-4.23)/tt = (10.27-4.23)/9.8t = 6.04/9.8t = 0.62 secondsHence, the time it takes the object to fall is 0.62 seconds.
Learn more about impulse-momentum theorem here: https://brainly.com/question/14121529
#SPJ1
(a) when a 9.00-v battery is connected to the plates of a capacitor, it stores a charge of 27.0 mc. what is the value of the capacitance? (b) if the same capacitor is connected to a 12.0-v battery, what charge is stored?
The formula for calculating capacitance is as follows:
C = Q/V
Where,
C = capacitance (Farads)
Q = charge (Coulombs)
V = voltage (Volts)
As given,
Q = 27.0 μC
V = 9.00 V
Substituting the given values in the above equation
C = 27.0 μC/9.00 V = 3.00 μF
Therefore, the value of capacitance is 3.00 μF.
The formula for calculating charge stored is as follows:
Q = CV
Where,
Q = charge (Coulombs)
C = capacitance (Farads)
V = voltage (Volts)
As given,
C = 3.00 μF
V = 12.0 V
Substituting the given values in the above equation,
Q = (3.00 × 10⁻⁶ F) × 12.0 V = 36.0 μC
Therefore, the charge stored is 36.0 μC.
Learn more about the charge stored at https://brainly.com/question/27393410
#SPJ11
a bowling ball has a mass of 6 kg. if you slowly roll the ball off the edge of a table 1.5 m high table, what is the kinetic energy of the ball when it hits the ground?
The kinetic energy of the ball when hits the ground is 88.2 J
The formula for calculating kinetic energy is
KE = 1/2mv²
Where KE is kinetic energy, m is mass, and v is velocity.
We have, the mass of the bowling ball is 6 kg, and it is dropped from a height of 1.5 m, we can calculate its velocity just before it hits the ground as follows:
Potential energy = mgh
Where m = mass of the object = 6 kg
g = acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²), and
h = height from which the object is dropped = 1.5 m
PE = mgh
= (6 kg)(9.8 m/s²)(1.5 m)
= 88.2 J
The potential energy of the bowling ball is 88.2 J.
This is equal to its kinetic energy just before it hits the ground.
Therefore, the kinetic energy of the ball is 88.2 J.
To know more about "kinetic energy": https://brainly.com/question/25959744
#SPJ11
an object floating in a container of water and partially submerged has the same density as the water. question 2 options: true false
The given statement "an object floating in a container of water and partially submerged has the same density as the water" is true.
When an object is placed in water, it sinks until the weight of the water displaced by the object equals the weight of the object.
If an object has the same density as water, it displaces an equal amount of water to its own weight. When it displaces the same amount of water that has an equivalent mass to the object, it will float partially submerged. If the object's density is greater than water, it will sink. If the object's density is less than that of water, it will float entirely above the water's surface.
Density is defined as the mass of an object per unit volume. The formula for density is mass/volume. Density is a crucial physical property that is used to define and classify materials. The density of an object is determined by its mass and volume. The unit of measurement for density is kg/m3 or g/cm3. The density of water is 1 g/cm3, which is why objects with a density of less than 1 g/cm3 float on water.
An object floating in a container of water and partially submerged has the same density as the water.
To know more about density click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15164682
#SPJ11
a 20-tooth spur pinion has a diametral pitch of 12 teeth/in, runs at 2100 rev/min, and drives a gear at a speed of 1400 rev/min. find the number of teeth on the gear and the theoretical center-to-center distance.
The number of teeth on the driven gear is 14 and the theoretical center-to-center distance is 3.34 inches.
Speed Ratio: Speed Ratio = (Number of Teeth on Driven Gear)/(Number of Teeth on Driving Gear). The Speed Ratio = 1400 rev/min/2100 rev/min = 0.6667.
Therefore, the number of teeth on the driven gear = (Number of Teeth on Driving Gear) x (Speed Ratio) = 20 x 0.6667 = 13.33. Rounding up, we can conclude that the number of teeth on the driven gear is 14.
The next step is to find the theoretical center-to-center distance. To do this, we need to use the formula for calculating Pitch Diameter: Pitch Diameter = (Number of Teeth)/(Diametral Pitch).
In this case, the Pitch Diameter of the driving gear is (20 teeth)/(12 teeth/in) = 1.67 inches. Therefore, the center-to-center distance = Pitch Diameter x 2 = 1.67 inches x 2 = 3.34 inches.
Hence the number of teeth on the driven gear is 14 and the theoretical center-to-center distance is 3.34 inches.
to know more about distance refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15172156#
#SPJ11
a track star runs a 400-m race on a 400-m circular track in 45 s. what is his angular velocity assuming a constant speed?
The angular velocity assuming a constant speed for a track-star who runs 400 m circular track in 45 s is 0.139 radians/s.
To calculate the angular velocity first the circumference of the track is 400 meters.
This means that the angular displacement of the track star during the race is:
θ = s / r
where θ is the angular displacement,
s is the distance traveled by the track star (which is equal to the circumference of the track), and
r is the radius of the circular track.
2.) Since the radius of the circular track is half of its diameter, we have:
r = 400 m / 2 = 200 m
Plugging this into the equation for angular displacement, we get:
θ = 400 m / 200 m = 2π radians
3.) Next, we can use the formula for angular velocity:
ω = θ / t
where ω is the angular velocity and
t is the time it takes for the track star to complete the race.
4.)Plugging in the values we have:
ω = θ / t
ω = 2π radians / 45 s
Therefore, the angular velocity of the track star is:
ω = 0.139 radians/s (rounded to three significant figures)
Therefore, the track star's angular velocity assuming a constant speed is approximately 0.139 radians/s
The angular displacement of the track star is equal to one complete revolution around the circular track, which is equal to 2π radians.
To practice more questions about angular velocity: https://brainly.com/question/6860269
#SPJ11
suppose we see the spectral lines to a distant star doppler shifted to smaller wavelengths. what does this tell us about the star's motion?
Suppose we see the spectral lines to a distant star doppler shifted to smaller wavelengths. This tells us that the star is moving toward the observer.
The Doppler effect, also known as the Doppler shift, is a phenomenon in which waves, such as sound or light waves, shift in frequency when their source and observer are moving relative to one another. As a result, the wavelength appears to be altered when the source of the waves approaches or recedes from the observer.
In this situation, if we see the spectral lines to a distant star Doppler shifted to smaller wavelengths, it suggests that the star is moving towards the observer. It is caused by the Doppler effect, which alters the frequency of light when its source is moving relative to the observer.
Learn more about Doppler effect at https://brainly.com/question/1330077
#SPJ11
two balls with masses of 2 kg and 6,3 kg travel toward each other at speeds of f14 and 3 respectively if the balls have a head on inelastic collision and the 2 kg ball recoils with a speed of 3.2 how much kinetic energy
If the balls have a head-on, inelastic collision and the 2.0-kg ball recoils with a speed of 3.2 m/s, the kinetic energy lost in the collision is 364.6 J.
Using conservation of momentum, we can find the final velocity:
m1 * v1 + m2 * v2 = (m1 + m2) * vf
Solving for vf, we get:
vf = (m1 * v1 + m2 * v2) / (m1 + m2)
= (2.0 kg * 14 m/s + 6.3 kg * 4.0 m/s) / (2.0 kg + 6.3 kg)
= 6.0 m/s
The final total kinetic energy of the system is:
KEf = (1/2) * (m1 + m2) * vf^2
= (1/2) * 8.3 kg * (6.0 m/s)^2
= 112.2 J
The kinetic energy lost in the collision is the difference between the initial and final kinetic energies:
KE lost = KEi - KEf
= 476.8 J - 112.2 J
= 364.6 J
An inelastic collision is a type of collision between two or more objects in which the total kinetic energy of the system is not conserved. In an inelastic collision, some or all of the kinetic energy of the colliding objects is converted into other forms of energy such as heat, sound, or deformation of the objects.
In an inelastic collision, the colliding objects stick together after the collision and move with a common velocity. This is in contrast to an elastic collision, in which the colliding objects bounce off each other and the total kinetic energy of the system is conserved. Inelastic collisions can occur in many different situations, such as in car crashes, when two objects collide and stick together, or when a ball hits a wall and loses some of its kinetic energy due to deformation.
To learn more about Inelastic collision visit here:
brainly.com/question/15742157
#SPJ4
Complete Question: -
Two balls with masses of 2.0 kg and 6.3 kg travel toward each other at speeds of 14 m/s and 4.0 m/s, respectively. If the balls have a head-on, inelastic collision and the 2.0-kg ball recoils with a speed of 3.2 m/s, how much kinetic energy is lost in the collision?
how does the plot differ from the plots for tube radius, viscosity, and tube length? how well did the results compare with your prediction
The plot differs for tube radius, viscosity, and tube length in terms of their effect on fluid flow. The effect of each parameter is analyzed and plotted against the velocity profile of the fluid flow.
For tube radius, as the radius increases, the fluid flow velocity increases as well. This can be observed in the plot where the velocity profile is a bell-shaped curve, with the peak shifting to the right as the radius increases.
For viscosity, the effect is the opposite. As viscosity increases, the fluid flow velocity decreases. This can be observed in the plot where the velocity profile is a flatter curve, with a smaller peak as the viscosity increases.
For tube length, there is a similar effect as tube radius. As the length increases, the fluid flow velocity decreases. This can be observed in the plot where the velocity profile is a bell-shaped curve, with the peak shifting to the left as the length increases.
In terms of the comparison with the prediction, the results were mostly in line with what was expected. The plots showed the expected trends for each parameter, and the quantitative analysis confirmed this as well. However, there were some discrepancies between the predicted and actual values, which could be due to experimental error or limitations in the model used.
Overall, the results provided valuable insights into the relationship between these parameters and fluid flow, and can be used to optimize fluid systems for various applications.
For more such questions on Fluid flow.
https://brainly.com/question/30022802#
#SPJ11
a box rests on an incline. if the coefficient of static friction between the box and the incline is 0.400, at what minimum angle would the box begin to move?
The minimum angle at which the box would begin to move is given by the equation $\mu_{s} = \tan{\theta}$,is 21.8°.
Let's consider the following diagram: In the above, m is the mass of the box, θ is the angle of the incline, N is the normal force, f is the force of friction, and mg is the gravitational force acting on the box in the downward direction.
The box will be at the threshold of sliding up or down the plane when the gravitational force acting down the plane is greater than the frictional force acting up the plane. Therefore, the minimum angle at which the box will start to move is:tanθ = μswhere μs is the coefficient of static friction=0.4 (Given). Thus,θ= tan-1 (0.4)θ = 21.8 degrees.
Therefore, the box will start to move when the angle of inclination of the plane is 21.8 degrees (minimum angle).
Read more about mass:
https://brainly.com/question/19385703:
#SPJ11
the generation of multiple forecasts of future conditions followed by an analysis of how to respond effectively to each of those conditions is
The process described in the question is known as scenario planning. It is a strategic planning method that involves generating multiple plausible scenarios of future conditions and analyzing the potential impact of each scenario on an organization or a system.
Scenario planning is a useful tool for decision-making, risk management, and identifying opportunities in an uncertain or rapidly changing environment.
By developing a range of scenarios, decision-makers can anticipate potential challenges and opportunities and develop strategies to respond effectively to each situation.
This approach allows organizations to be better prepared and more resilient in the face of future uncertainties. Scenario planning can be applied to various fields, including business, economics, environmental planning, and public policy.
For more details about strategic click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16699515#
#SPJ11
if a 3 solar mass star and a 10 solar mass star formed together in a binary system, which star would evolve off the main sequence first?
In a binary system with a 3 solar mass star and a 10 solar mass star, the 10 solar mass star would evolve off the main sequence first. This is because more massive stars have shorter lifetimes due to their higher rate of nuclear fusion.
As per the masses of the 3 solar mass star and the 10 solar mass star, the 3 solar mass star would evolve off the main sequence first if they formed together in a binary system. The main sequence is a continuous and distinctive band that appears on plots of stellar color versus brightness. Most stars are found in this band, including the Sun.
The main sequence is the band that represents the stars in the core hydrogen-burning phase. In contrast to the core helium-burning red clump giants and the helium-fusing horizontal branch stars, stars on the main sequence are in a stable state of nuclear fusion.
Because of the higher temperatures inside, more massive stars have a greater rate of nuclear reactions and consume their fuel more quickly. As a result, if a 3 solar mass star and a 10 solar mass star formed together in a binary system, the 3 solar mass star would evolve off the main sequence first.
Know more about nuclear fusion here:
https://brainly.com/question/982293
#SPJ11
How is the blue color of a reflection nebula related to the blue color of the daytime sky?
Reflection nebulae look blue for the same reason the sky looks blue. Short wavelengths scatter more easily than long wavelengths.
The blue color of a reflection nebula is related to the blue color of the daytime sky because both phenomena are caused by the scattering of light.
In the case of the daytime sky, the blue color is due to the scattering of sunlight by the Earth's atmosphere, which causes blue light to be scattered more than other colors, making it the dominant color in the sky. In a reflection nebula, the blue color is also caused by the scattering of light, but this time it is by dust grains in the nebula reflecting light from nearby stars.
The dust grains scatter blue light more effectively than other colors, which gives the nebula its characteristic blue color. Therefore, both the blue color of the sky and the blue color of a reflection nebula are a result of the scattering of light by particles in their respective environments.
To know more about nebula, here
brainly.com/question/9497068
#SPJ4
--The complete question is, How is the blue color of a reflection nebula related to the blue color of the daytime sky?--