At a basketball game, a vender sold a combined total of 161 sodas and hot dogs. The number of sodas sold was 31 more than the number of hot dogs sold. Find
the number of sodas sold and the number of hot dogs sold.

Answer:

1200 units 30 times 40 is 1200

1200 sq units

hope this helps

Answer:

-16.1y + 14

Step-by-step explanation:

–7(2.3y − 2)

=> -16.1y + 14

Therefore, -16.1y + 14 is the simplified form.

Hoped this helped

[tex]GeniusUser[/tex]

Answer:

53

Step-by-step explanation:

sorry if im incorrect

Answer:

31). (0,-2), (2,-5).

32). (0,-1), (5,3).

33). (0,1), (5,-2).

34). (0,1), (4,0).

Answer:

(4, -6)

Step-by-step explanation:

The rule for rotation around the origin 90 degrees clockwise is

Ro, 90: (x, y) --> (y, -x)

so (6, 4) --> (4, -6)

Answer:

88 people

Step-by-step explanation:

Start with the equation of

[tex]3,000\geq 33x+80[/tex]

subtract 80

[tex]3.000\geq 33x[/tex]

then divide by 33

[tex]88.48\geq x[/tex]

round down

[tex]x=88[/tex]

Answer:

1st one is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

please mark my answer in brainlist plz

Answer:

41) 10

42) 65

43) 26

44) 33

45)65

41.)10

42.) 65

43.)26

44.)33

45.)65

hoped that helped:)

Answer:

36 yards

Step-by-step explanation:

48 - 31 = 17

17 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 4 = 36

The total distance between  the ball and the goal line is 36 yards

In computing, data is information that has been translated into a form that is efficient for movement or processing.

Given:

Eagles have the ball 48 yards away from the goal line.

On the first play, the Eagles gain 31 yards on a pass toward the goal line. On the next four plays, the Eagles lose 3, 5, 7, and 4 yards.

After first day they have yards remaining

=48 - 31

= 17

Now, the total distance between  the ball and the goal line

=17 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 4

= 36

Learn more about data here:

https://brainly.com/question/15403824

#SPJ2

According to the table, f(x) = 9 when x = -5. So if g(x) is the inverse of f(x), it follows that g(9) = -5.

By the inverse function theorem,

[tex]g'(9) = \dfrac1{f'(g(9))} = \dfrac1{f'(-5)} = \boxed{-\dfrac14}[/tex]

Answer:

multiple choice is worth 2

short response is worth 4

Step-by-step explanation:

23x + 10y = 86

28x + 5y = 76

solve by elimination

multiply the top by -1 and the bottom by 2

-23x + -10y = -86

56x + 10y = 152

add them

33x = 66

x = 2

with x = 2 plug x into one of the equations

23x + 10y = 86

23(2) + 10y = 86

46 + 10y = 86

10y = 40

y = 4

x = 2 and y = 4 so

multiple choice is worth 2

short response is worth 4

Answer:

49 square metres

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a square is the length of the side times itself.

The area is 7 x 7 = 49

Answer:

x = 80

Step-by-step explanation:

Reverse your division by using multiplication:

x/-4 = -20

-4 x -20 = 80

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5,600 g of flour

10,000g of sugar

3,200g of ginger

4,400g of butter

Just have to multiply each ingredient by 40

It is the 3rd one from the top

Answer:

I believe the answer would be C.

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all, the solution to the answer really is 1/20. If you figure out the decimal form of 4/5, it is 0.80, which is closer to 1 than to 1/2 and 0. The decimal form of 3/4 is 0.75, which is equally close to 1 and 1/2, being 0.25 from both. But it is closer to 1 than 0. I hope I’m right, and I hope this helps. :)

Ages of swapna and suma are 33 and 7 years old respectively

If Swapna is 26 years older than her daughter Suma, then;

x = y + 26 ............... 1

6 years later:

Age of Swapna  = x + 6

Age of Suna = y + 6

If Swapna will be thrice as old as Suma, then;

x + 6  = 3(y + 6) ................. 2

Substitute equation 1 into 2:

y + 26 + 6 = 3y + 18

y + 32 = 3y + 18

-2y = -14

y = 7

Since x = y + 26

x = 26 + 7

x = 33

Hence ages of swapna and suma are 33 and 7 years old respectively

Learn more on equation here: https://brainly.com/question/2972832

Answer:

  x = 10

Step-by-step explanation:

The diagonals of a rectangle are the same length. This means ...

  AC = BD

  x +6 = 2x -4

  10 = x . . . . . . . . add 4-x to both sides

The figure is a rectangle for x=10.

Answer:

Customary

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

it is based on customary units

Answer:

56

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i think its 140 because u got to add all the sides in order to subtract from 180

i dont know  if its right but that is what i think UwU

The cost of 35 pounds of oolong tea is $84.

An equation is used to show the relationship between two or more variables or numbers.

Given that oolong tea sells for $2.40 per pound.

There are 35 pounds of oolong tea available. Hence:

Cost of 35 pounds of oolong tea = $2.40 per pound * 35 pound

Cost = $84

Hence, the cost of 35 pounds of oolong tea is $84.

Find out more at: https://brainly.com/question/21105092

Answer:

35 LB (THIS IS ACTUALLY CORRECT)

Step-by-step explanation:

First, you lay it down like this:

Since you're selling 35 pounds of oolong tea that sells for $2.40, you multiply both

2.4*35

=84

However, since you don't know how many pounds of black tea, you use x

Multiply like above

1.8*x

=1.8x

The total mixture is selling for $2.10

Total pounds: 35 + x (given above, or black + oolong tea

equation:

84 + 1.8x = 2.1(35+x)

84 + 1.8x = 73.5 + 2.1x (distributive property)

    - 1.8x             - 1.8x

84 + 0 = 73.5 + 0.3x

-73.5             -73.5

10.5 = 0.3x

3.5 = 0.1x

35 = x

Answer:

ang hirap naman plss answeer

Answer:  659

Step by step solution:

Answer:

659

Step-by-step explanation:

0659

8 5272

0

52

48

 47

 40

   72

   72

     0

Dividend:

5272

Divisor:

8

Quotient:

659

Remainder:

0

You may have to write this on paper because it might be hard for you to understand. I'm sorry if this isn't helping and it is very confusing, this is the only way that I could explain it. Thank you for the question and I hope you enjoy your answer :)

Step-by-step explanation:

<B=180°-70°-50°=60°

hope this helps you.

Answer:

Plan A: 1600 homes after 3 years Plan B: 1330 homes after 3 years

Step-by-step explanation:

Plan A.

200x3=600

1000+600=1600

1600 homes after 3 years

Plan B.

10% the first year =100 homes increased

10% the secound year = 110 homes increased

10% the third year = 121 homes increased

1330 homes after 3 years

It would be 1330 for plan B. And plan a 1600.

Answer: The equation is not an identity

==========================================================

Explanation:

We'll expand out the right hand side to see if we can simplify it to the left hand side. The stuff on the left will stay the same for each step.

I'll use  c = a+b as a way to help distribute.

[tex]a^4 + b^4 = (a+b)(a^3 - a^2b-ab^2 + b^3)\\\\a^4 + b^4 = c(a^3 - a^2b-ab^2 + b^3)\\\\a^4 + b^4 = a^3c - a^2bc-ab^2c + b^3c\\\\a^4 + b^4 = a^3(c) - a^2b(c)-ab^2(c) + b^3(c)\\\\a^4 + b^4 = a^3(a+b) - a^2b(a+b)-ab^2(a+b) + b^3(a+b)\\\\a^4 + b^4 = a^4+a^3b - a^3b-a^2b^2-a^2b^2-ab^3 + ab^3+b^4\\\\a^4 + b^4 = a^4+(a^3b - a^3b)+(-a^2b^2-a^2b^2)+(-ab^3 + ab^3)+b^4\\\\a^4 + b^4 = a^4-2a^2b^2+b^4\\\\[/tex]

Unfortunately, we can't go any further. We have a^4 and b^4 on the right hand side, but we also have the term -2a^2b^2 that didn't cancel out. Therefore, the original equation is not an identity.

----------------

Here's another way you can see that we don't have an identity.

Let's say we fixed 'a' to be equal to 1.

That means the equation

[tex]a^4 + b^4 = (a+b)(a^3 - a^2b-ab^2 + b^3)[/tex]

would turn into

[tex]1^4 + b^4 = (1+b)(1^3 - 1^2b-1b^2 + b^3)[/tex]

and simplify to

[tex]1 + b^4 = (1+b)(1 - b-b^2 + b^3)[/tex]

Now replace b with x and you'll have the two equations to represent the left and right hand sides

[tex]y = 1+x^4\\y = (1+x)(1-x-x^2+x^3)[/tex]

which you can graph on the same xy axis. You should note that the two equations produce different curves. The curves would need to be identical if we wanted an identity to happen.

Side note: you can pick other values for 'a' instead of just 1.

Answer:

448000004.

Hope that helps. x

Answer:

448000004

Step-by-step explanation:

QUICK MATHS

1 = Given

2 = Addition Property of Equality

3 = Division Property of Equality