BRAINLIEST
Please help me out

allah......................................

Answer: He enforced very strict rules.

Explanation:

Answer:

A. Temperance

Explanation:

Suffrage was for voting and the 18th Amendment, while connected to alcohol, was not a movement.

Answer:

The secessionists claimed that according to the Constitution every state had the right to leave the Union. Lincoln claimed that they did not have that right. He opposed secession for these reasons: ... A government that allows secession will disintegrate into anarchy.

Explanation:

Answer:

according to the Constitution every state had the right to leave the Union. uh this answer might not help...

Answer: Yes, I think that whites that weren't apart of the KKK should have helped fight back against the KKK. I believe that even though everyone can have their own opinion I think that their are still some things that as humans we can define as immoral or incorrect. Most of the people in fact that were fighting against the KKK and slavery were white members who owned land because they had a big say and really showed that slavery and the other discrimination tactics were morally wrong.

Explanation:

it because of the slaves i dont know much but i do know it cause the slaves

Answer:

Haitian Revolution

Explanation:

Explanation:

The fall of Constantinople to the ottoman empire in 1453 ended the Byzantine Empire.

Answer:

Land with waters that drained into the Mississippi River.

Answer:

Arts . d.

Explanation:

The Renaissance was a period of "rebirth" in arts, science and European society. It was a time of transition from the ancient world to the modern.

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

because i hate construntction

Answer:

Following Napoleon giving up political power on France in 1799, He was crowned by himself the emperor in 1804. With Napoleon being a skilled strategist in the military, he succeeded in waging war against multiple unions of European countries and made his empire bigger.

Hope this helps out! :D

How has the union changed over time?

The number of employed union members has declined by 2.9 million since 1983. During the same time, the number of all wage and salary workers grew from 88.3 million to 133.7 million. Consequently, the union membership rate was 20.1 percent in 1983 and declined to 11.1 percent in 2015.

How do labor unions affect us today?

They raise wages, reduce inequality, close pay gaps, and they make democracy work by getting more people into the process and helping advocate for the positions that the working class supports. Unions, they help balance power in our economy and democracy, and that's fundamentally needed right now.

What do unions do today?

Union members work together to negotiate and enforce a contract with management that guarantees the things you care about like decent raises, affordable health care, job security, and a stable schedule. Better workplaces and working conditions without the fear of retaliation.

Are unions effective today?

Over the past several decades, union membership has steadily declined. Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicates that in 1983, 20.1% of employed Americans were members of a union. By 2019, that share had decreased by roughly half to 10.3%.

Why did unions develop?

Labor unions were created in order to help the workers with work-related difficulties such as low pay, unsafe or unsanitary working conditions, long hours, and other situations. Workers often had problems with their bosses as a result of membership in the unions.

Hope that helped:)

Explanation:

The number of employed union members has declined by 2.9 million since 1983. During the same time, the number of all wage and salary workers grew from 88.3 million to 133.7 million. Consequently, the union membership rate was 20.1 percent in 1983 and declined to 11.1 percent in 2015.

Answer:

im ppretty sure its c dont be mad if im wrong let me know if im wrong plss so i can know

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes they can If the government has a compelling interest it is seeking to protect, and the fundamental right the government seeks to restrict is fairly and narrowly regulated by the law in question, the restrictive law may be upheld by the courts.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes, but only to a certain extent.

The government must be able to balance individual rights with the rights of the national interest. This may entirely depend on the level of security that the government would need. For example, other than fire balloons that were sent into the mainland of the US from Japan, there was little to no need for security for foreign invasions to the United States during World War II. This makes it so that in the probable cause of Japanese-descent residents to join the Axis Power is bar none, with no secure way to communicate. However, that does not mean that they would not be able to communicate information as a whole, but that it is typically only a one-way street, in which the Japanese government cannot fully help any dissenters within the United States. National Security is the only justifiable reason to enact limits on rights, and even then, it is frowned upon. Any other limitations, such as lockdowns for diseases, for example, are not justifiable in limiting a person's rights to their life choices, their liberties, and even equality of opportunities for each person depending on their job preferences.

At the end of the day, the government is to serve the people, not the other way around. The days of Feudalism and the security of Royalty is already over, and governments who fail to provide security, prosperity, and equality would either be overthrown by the people, or else by foreign interests.

Answer:

People didn't like ti

Explanation:

Answer:

China, Japan and the Spice Islands. If he could reach these lands, he would be able to bring back rich cargoes of silks and spices.

Answer: $8 (Assuming that she used all of her earnings for candy bars).

Explanation:

Not sure if it's correct because there isn't any additional information.

Answer: Jingle Bells

It is an assumption. I hope this helps.

Explanation:

We can think of tension in a given rope as T = (m × g) + (m × a), where "g" is the acceleration due to the gravity of any objects the rope is supporting and "a" is any other acceleration on any objects the rope is supporting.

Answer:

I don't care whether slavery is up or down.

Explanation:

Just sum to earn points

Answer:

The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could not interfere with private contracts.

The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could not interfere with private contracts.

Explanation:

Answer:

El Greco

Explanation:

Don Quixote is the character of a book.

Shakespeare is English writer

Answer:

This question is a question that needs to be answered by yourself

Explanation:

Your everyday life is different from other people's, it is asking how these ideals reflect in YOUR everyday life.