The Global South is a term used to refer to a group of countries with similar characteristics and issues, despite their geographical and cultural diversity. The categorization of these countries is complex, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach to defining them. However, one way to categorize the Global South is to look at their levels of economic development and political stability.
1) Least Developed Countries (LDCs):
These are countries that are considered to be at the lowest level of economic development, with low levels of human development and a high degree of vulnerability to external shocks. According to the United Nations, there are currently 46 LDCs, mostly located in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. These countries face significant challenges in terms of poverty, food security, access to basic services, and infrastructure development.
2) Middle-Income Countries (MICs):
These countries are characterized by moderate levels of economic development and political stability, with relatively diverse economies and higher levels of human development. MICs are often seen as the engine of economic growth in the Global South, with large populations and growing middle classes driving demand for goods and services. Countries such as Brazil, China, India, and South Africa are often considered to be MICs.
3) Fragile and Conflict-Affected States (FCAS):
These are countries that face significant challenges related to political instability, conflict, and violence. FCAS are often characterized by weak governance, a lack of basic services, and high levels of poverty. Countries such as Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen are examples of FCAS. These countries face significant challenges in terms of development, with humanitarian crises often exacerbating existing issues.
To learn more about Global South:
https://brainly.com/question/17127333?referrer=searchResults
The Britist wanted to prevent fighting between the colonists and Native blank?
Answer: The Proclamation of 1763 was issued by the British at the end of the French and Indian War to appease Native Americans by checking the encroachment of European settlers on their lands.
Those who favored independence from Great Britain were called Patriots. Those who wished that the Colonies remain tied to Great Britain were known as Loyalists.
Each colony had its government, but the British king controlled these governments. By the 1770s, many colonists were angry because they did not have self-government. This meant that they could not govern themselves and make their laws. They had to pay high taxes to the king.
HELP
Which of these was not one of the factors that contributed to the Dust Bowl?
a) black blizzards
b) changes in weather
c) farming technology
d) federal land policies
These was not one of the factors that contributed to the Dust Bowl (b) changes in weather.
What influenced the Dust Bowl in terms of the environment?During the 1930s, a substantial migrant community of impoverished, rural Americans emerged due to a combination of aggressive and subpar farming practices, regional drought, and strong winds. As a result, many of people were forced to leave their homes by massive dust storms.
What two effects did the Dust Bowl have on the environment?Around 10 million acres of topsoil were lost during the 1930s drought, which was accompanied by powerful winds that carried away 480 tons of topsoil each acre. The dust and sand storms affected air quality, decreased soil productivity, and were harmful to human health.
To Know more about human health.
https://brainly.com/question/1604025
#SPJ1
Following the Mexican-American War, Mexico experienced what?
Answer:
The war ended
⬆️ short answer
Explanation:
When the Mexican-American War was over, there was a treaty that was signed. The treaty between Mexico and America was signed on February 2nd of 1848. The treaty was signed on February 2nd of 1848 in Guadalupe Hidalgo.
HELP QUICKLY PLEASE! 10+ POINTS!
How does Hume explain causation? Please explain how he arrives at this conclusion?
The basic idea is that, although correlation or statistical dependence cannot determine the causal relationship between two variables, it can, under plausible assumptions, determine some causal relationships when three or more variables are considered.
What is one strategy the Soviet Union pursued to prevent hostle powers from taking control of Eurasia?
Answer: The Cold War started in Europe. From 1945 to 1953, the USSR expanded its influence by creating the Eastern Bloc across states like Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary. Stalin set up puppet communist governments that he could control. He repressed anyone who resisted.
First laid out by George F. Kennan in 1947, the policy stated that communism needed to be contained and isolated, or else it would spread to neighboring countries.
A constant nonviolent state of hostility between the Soviet Union and the US; began shortly after WWII with the rapid extension of Soviet influence over eastern Europe and North Korea; ended with the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
What is the value of x?
Mathematics*
PLEASE HELPPP ME i will mark brainlist to whoever answers first
Read all of “Letter from Birmingham Jail” written by Mather King Jr and Write 3 analytical paragraphs answering the following questions
1. What is the central purpose of the letter?
2. How do the allusions that King uses help the audience relate to him and his message?
3. What evidence does King give as to why he deserves to be in Birmingham?
4. According to King, what is the difference between just and unjust laws?
5. What metaphor does King use to close his argument? Why is effective?
Answer: Check Below
Explanation:
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a powerful and influential piece of literature that addresses the issue of racial inequality in the United States during the 1960s. The central purpose of the letter was to defend the nonviolent protests and civil disobedience of African Americans in Birmingham. King argues that these protests were necessary to bring attention to the injustices faced by Black people, and to force the white majority to take action to end segregation and discrimination. He argues that these actions were not only justified, but necessary in order to bring about change and achieve justice.
King's use of allusions throughout the letter helped his audience relate to him and his message by drawing on shared cultural and historical references. For example, he cites biblical figures such as Paul, Martin Buber, and Socrates to support his argument that nonviolent protest is a moral imperative. He also references historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson to demonstrate that civil disobedience has been a necessary and effective tool in the struggle for justice throughout American history. By using these allusions, King establishes a connection with his audience and makes his argument more persuasive.
King provides several pieces of evidence throughout the letter to support his claim that he deserves to be in Birmingham. He argues that he is a minister and civil rights leader who has been invited to Birmingham by local organizations, and that he has a responsibility to fight for justice and equality wherever he sees it being denied. He also points to his record of peaceful activism and leadership in the civil rights movement as evidence of his commitment to nonviolence and justice. By providing this evidence, King establishes his credibility and argues that his presence in Birmingham is not only justified, but necessary to bring about change.
In conclusion, "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a powerful and persuasive argument for the necessity of nonviolent protest and civil disobedience in the fight for justice and equality. Through his use of allusions, evidence, and persuasive language, King makes a compelling case for the moral imperative of nonviolent protest and the urgency of the struggle for racial equality in America. His letter remains a powerful reminder of the ongoing struggle for justice and the importance of continuing to fight for equality and human rights for all people.
How did Roosevelt’s Corollary change the original Monroe Doctrine?
What explanation can be made for why the United States did not get involved in World War II until much later? Use examples from the article in the correct order to support your answer.
The U.S.'s decision to remain neutral during the early years of World War II can be attributed to a combination of domestic factors and a desire to avoid foreign entanglements.
The United States' decision to remain neutral during the early years of World War II was primarily driven by a combination of domestic politics, economic concerns, and a desire to avoid foreign entanglements. One of the key factors was the legacy of World War I, which had left a lasting impact on American public opinion and created a strong isolationist sentiment. Additionally, the U.S. was still recovering from the Great Depression and was reluctant to commit resources to another war. President Franklin D. Roosevelt also faced political challenges in trying to shift public opinion towards interventionism.
However, events such as the fall of France and the bombing of Pearl Harbor eventually forced the U.S. to enter the war. The article "Why Did the US Enter WW2 So Late?" highlights the role of the lend-lease program, which allowed the U.S. to provide material support to Allied countries without directly entering the war.
Learn more about united states here:
https://brainly.com/question/1527526
#SPJ1
How did Washington feel about the Constitution?
Answer:
He believed that the Constitution that emerged from the convention was the best possible for the time and praised the document for being amendable.
What led to Syria being considered a failed state?
A.
An invasion led by U.S. forces forced Saddam Hussein out of power.
B.
King Abdullah chose 30 women to serve in the Consultative Council.
C.
A low GDP and the resulting poverty caused conflicts between its citizens.
D.
Large parts of the country came under the control of rebel groups and terrorists.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP!!!
Answer:
D. Large parts of the country came under the control of rebel groups and terrorists
Explanation:
Allow me to explain. Rebel formations control much of the state. The northern part of the country along the border with Turkey is largely controlled by the Al Nusra Front.
. The central and southern areas with Dara province as their center of control are the so-called The Free Syrian Army (FSA), while the east of the country, rich in energy and sparsely populated, is hold by ISIL, with a center in Raka.
⚫ On the side of the Syrian rebels, In addition to a portion of the indigenous population, numerous volunteers from countries around the world are at war, drawn by the Idea of global jihad.
What was an effect of the Servicemen's Readjustment Act?
A It ended segregation in all branches of the U.S. military.
B It created economic disparities between Black and white veterans.
C It established a minimum level of five million men for the U.S. Army.
D It established a draft system for all men between the ages of 18 and 25.
Help ASP please… :(
Option (c), For the U.S. Army, the Servicemen's Readjustment Act set a minimum of five million men.
What challenges did veterans encounter after the Second World War ended?Veterans faced a number of challenges when they got home from the war. Things like a lack of prior knowledge made it difficult to flourish, obtain job, and a place to live. After the end of the war, opportunities unexpectedly dried up. By 1947, at least two million American women were no longer employed.
What effects did the GI Bill of Rights have on veterans and the US economy?Moreover, it provided veterans with a year of unemployment benefits and paid for their medical bills. It also sponsored home loans. The Act was a great success, raising Americans' educational attainment and boosting the postwar economy.
Learn more about Servicemen's Readjustment Act: https://brainly.com/question/28862934
#SPJ1
The question here is, if a person's religious beliefs conflict with the law or lead to bias against other groups, should the government protect the exercise of those beliefs? Why or why not? Are religious/moral exemptions ever appropriate/inappropriate? Under which circumstances?
Answer:
Explanation:
This is a complex and controversial issue that requires careful consideration of the principles of religious freedom, equality, and the rule of law. Here are some points to consider:
Religious freedom is an important human right that is protected by the Constitution and international law. Individuals have the right to practice their religion and hold their beliefs without interference from the government or others.
However, this right is not absolute and can be limited in certain circumstances. For example, the government can limit religious practices that are harmful to others, such as human sacrifice or religiously motivated violence.
Similarly, if a person's religious beliefs conflict with the law or lead to bias against other groups, the government may have a legitimate interest in limiting those beliefs. For example, if a person's religious beliefs lead them to discriminate against LGBTQ+ people or women, the government may have a legitimate interest in preventing that discrimination.
Religious exemptions may be appropriate in some circumstances, such as when they do not harm others or interfere with the rights of others. For example, allowing a religious group to use a public park for a religious ceremony outside of normal operating hours may not harm others or interfere with their rights.
However, religious exemptions can be inappropriate when they harm others or interfere with their rights. For example, allowing a business to discriminate against LGBTQ+ customers based on religious beliefs would harm those customers and interfere with their rights.
Ultimately, the government must balance the principles of religious freedom, equality, and the rule of law when considering religious exemptions. It must ensure that the rights of all individuals are protected, while also respecting the legitimate religious beliefs and practices of individuals and groups.
The government should consider protecting the exercise of religious beliefs that do not cause harm or discrimination against others. While individuals have the right to hold and practice their religious beliefs, these protections should be balanced with the need to prevent harm or prejudice towards others.
Religious/moral exemptions can be appropriate when they do not infringe upon the rights and well-being of others, allowing individuals to exercise their beliefs without adversely affecting others.
However, exemptions become inappropriate when they enable discrimination or deny essential services based on protected characteristics, as this goes against principles of equality and fairness.
Learn more about discrimination here:
https://brainly.com/question/14896067
#SPJ2
How were the booming economy, the Great Society, and the counterculture all connected?
Answer:
The booming economy, the Great Society, and the counterculture were all connected in various ways. The booming economy of the 1960s led to a period of great prosperity and optimism, which helped to fuel the growth of the Great Society, a set of social programs initiated by President Lyndon B. Johnson aimed at addressing poverty, inequality, and social injustice. The Great Society was influenced by the counterculture, a cultural and social movement that rejected mainstream values and promoted alternative lifestyles, beliefs, and forms of expression. The counterculture also played a role in shaping the Great Society's goals and priorities, as well as its critique of American society and politics. At the same time, the Great Society and the counterculture were both products of the economic and social changes of the 1960s, which created new opportunities, challenges, and aspirations for many Americans. Together, they reflected a complex and dynamic era of American history, marked by both progress and conflict, optimism and disillusionment, and continuity and change.
What law did Homer Plessy Break? Why?
Explanation:
Homer Plessy broke the Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890, which mandated racial segregation in public transportation. The law required separate railway cars for white and Black passengers, and it was designed to enforce racial segregation and discrimination.
Homer Plessy, who was a mixed-race African American, bought a ticket for a first-class train compartment designated for white passengers and refused to move to the "colored" car. His intention was to challenge the law's constitutionality and bring attention to the issue of racial segregation. Plessy was arrested and charged with violating the Separate Car Act, and his case ultimately led to the landmark Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896.
The Supreme Court upheld the Separate Car Act and established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed states to impose racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were deemed equal in quality. The decision allowed for the continued enforcement of segregation and discrimination against African Americans in public accommodations, education, and other areas of life for several decades until the Civil Rights Movement successfully challenged and overturned these laws in the mid-20th century.
what details in the passage support the claim that dorothea dix was a "dedicated humanitarian" with "extraordinary determination and persistence"?
The details in the passage support the claim that Dorothea Dix was a "dedicated humanitarian" with "extraordinary determination and persistence" is: her efforts to improve the treatment of people with mental illnesses and her founding of many schools for underprivileged girls.
What is the justification for the above response?Her determination and persistence are evident in her refusal to be idle when faced with bouts of ill health, as well as in her investigation of prisons and documentation of poor conditions.
The response highlights specific details from the passage that support the claim that Dorothea Dix was a dedicated humanitarian with extraordinary determination and persistence. These include her work to improve the treatment of people with mental illnesses, her founding of schools for underprivileged girls, her refusal to be idle when faced with health issues, and her investigation of prisons and documentation of poor conditions.
These details demonstrate her commitment to helping others and her perseverance in pursuing that goal.
Learn more about Dorothea Dix at:
https://brainly.com/question/30264816
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Dorothea Dix was a dedicated teacher, activist, and humanitarian of the nineteenth century. She is best known for her efforts to improve the treatment of people with mental illnesses. Through her extraordinary determination and persistence, Dorothea Dix helped better the lives of less fortunate people around the world.
EMERGING STRONG
Dorothea Dix was born in 1802 in Hampden, Maine. Little is known about her early childhood, but historians believe it was often difficult and plagued by poverty and neglect. At age 12, Dorothea Dix moved to Boston, Massachusetts, to live with her wealthy grandmother. She later moved in with her aunt in nearby Worcester, where she started teaching at a school for girls at the age of just 14.
In 1821, when Dorothea Dix was still a teenager, she founded the first of many schools she would run over the next decade. One of the schools she started was free to attend, giving poorer girls the opportunity to learn at a time when educating women was rare. Dorothea Dix's life of service to others had begun.
Unfortunately, Dorothea Dix faced several bouts of ill health during her teaching years. When she could not work at her schools, though, she refused to be idle. She wrote several popular books, including an 1824 science textbook called Conversations on Common Things. Many of her books encouraged clear moral standards for young women.
STUNNED BY EXPERIENCE
In 1841, Dorothea Dix accepted an offer to teach at a Boston women's prison, the East Cambridge House of Correction. Her experience working there propelled her into the life of activism that would eventually come to define her legacy.
In that era, there was little oversight of prisons. Dorothea Dix was appalled by the horrific conditions she saw at East Cambridge, especially the poor treatment of inmates with mental disorders. She began investigating other institutions around the state and documenting her observations. She found dirty, unheated cells and prisoners without proper clothing. Inmates had few rights, and their jailers often mistreated them.
What details in the passage support the claim that Dorothea Dix was a "dedicated humanitarian" with "extraordinary determination and persistence"?
Why did Americans want to limit the number of immigrants coming from China?
Answer:
Many Americans on the West Coast attributed declining wages and economic ills to Chinese workers. Although the Chinese composed only 0.002 percent of the nation's population, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act to placate worker demands and assuage concerns about maintaining white "racial purity.
Explanation:
I HOPED THIS HELPED AND I AM ALWAYS OPEN YOU CAN ALWAYS ASK ME QUESTIONS AND GOOD LUCK BY THE WAY!
Please help asap! The answer should be in the paragraph but I’m just not understanding it.
Madison's primary motivation for separation of powers i the national government is to provide each department of national agencies the freedom to conduct its own elections for members and internal affairs.
Provisions outlined in the constitution do not line up with Madison's reasoning as it states , that all the departments will have one superior to answer to in terms of authority.
Straightforward definition of constitution?The constitution serves as a political framework under which a nation's values and laws are created. The rights and responsibilities of people are there in the constitution. The constitution establishes how individuals and governments interact.
Why is it significant?A state's government is outlined in a constitution, which is a collection of laws and precepts. It serves as the foundation for all choices made by all members of the government, notably the legislature.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
What did the petition of right aim to prevent the monarch from doing? Select three options
The answers should be:
negotiating with foreign powers
imprisoning people without just cause
raising taxes without Parliament approval
was the Vietnam War contrary to the spirit of the Great Society, or an extension of it?
Answer:
Instead of being a part of the Great Society, the Vietnam War can be seen as something that goes against it. The Vietnam War was a military conflict that took place in a different country, while the Great Society was focused on fixing problems at home and making life better for Americans through social programs.
The cost of the war took money away from the programs of the Great Society, making them less powerful and effective. Also, the war caused deep splits in American society and hurt the sense of unity and shared goals that were needed to reach the goals of the Great Society.
Also, the Great Society was built on the ideas of social justice, equality, and human rights. Many people thought that the Vietnam War went against these ideas. People said that the war was bad because it hurt civilians and caused a lot of damage and deaths.
So, we can say that the Vietnam War was not an extension of the Great Society, but instead went against its goals.
Answer:
Vietnam war is an extension of great society
Help please
Examine the images above. The top one shows the amount of executive orders by presidents over the years, the other shows President Obama shredding the Constitution. What are they saying about executive orders?
The images are saying that executive orders have been used more and more frequently over time, and that President Obama has used them extensively.
What is Obama?Barack Obama is an American politician and the 44th President of the United States. He served as the first African-American President and was the first to be elected to two terms. Obama served as a Senator from Illinois from 2005 to 2008 and was the Democratic nominee for President in 2008 and 2012. His election in 2008 marked a historic milestone in the United States, and his presidency was marked by a number of significant accomplishments. Obama's initiatives included the Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. He also made several efforts to reduce US carbon emissions and expand diplomatic relations with other nations. During his presidency, Obama helped reduce unemployment, led the passage of several immigration reform bills, and supported marriage equality.
To learn more about Obama
https://brainly.com/question/1125105
#SPJ1
A compass rose indicates the directions north, south, east, and west.
TrueFalse
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A compass rose is a diagram that shows the directions of north, south, east, and west on a map or chart. It is usually represented as a circular design with arrows pointing towards the four cardinal directions, and sometimes includes additional intermediate directions such as northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest. The compass rose is a common feature on maps and charts used for navigation, as it helps to orient the user and provide a reference for determining the direction of travel. Therefore, the statement "A compass rose indicates the directions north, south, east, and west" is true.
Answer: TRUE
Explanation:
What allowed for rapid mobilization and the escalation of the war "on a colossal scale"?
The social and cultural factors such as religious or ethnic tensions can also contribute to escalation of conflicts and the mobilization of large numbers of people for war.
What are conflicts?Conflicts are disagreements, tensions, or clashes between two or more parties that arise due to differences in interests, goals, values, beliefs, or needs. Conflicts can occur at various levels, from interpersonal to intergroup, organizational, national, or international. They can manifest in various forms, such as verbal arguments, physical fights, legal battles, economic competition, political disputes, or military confrontations. Conflicts can have negative consequences, including harm to relationships, loss of resources, disruption of peace and stability, or even loss of life. However, conflicts can also offer opportunities for growth, learning, and innovation if managed constructively through dialogue, negotiation, mediation, or other conflict resolution techniques.
To learn more about conflict, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17745410
#SPJ1
What was the Iran-Contra Affair?
A. Bush was found to have invaded Grenada without any cause
B. Bush was caught wiretapping Iranian citizen phones
C. Reagan was caught secretly selling weapons to Iran
D. Reagan had funded pro-Cuban terrorists in Nicaragua
Which was not a change Woodrow Wilson called for in his Fourteen Points?
A) freedom of the seas
B) an end to secret diplomacy
C) stricter control over colonies worldwide
D) a new association of the world’s nations
Answer: D A new assosciation of the worlds nations
Explanation:
This naturally occurring process causes 2 different climates on opposite sides of a mountain:
Answer:
The process that causes two different climates on opposite sides of a mountain is called orographic precipitation. This occurs when moist air is forced to rise over a mountain, causing it to cool and condense into clouds and rain. The side of the mountain facing the wind will receive more precipitation, while the side facing away from the wind will be drier. This can create two distinct climates on either side of the mountain, with one side receiving more rain and having a cooler climate, while the
Explanation:
Help please, is this right? (view attachment)
Which specific development prompted Harry Truman to issue the Truman Doctrine?
Answer:
Yes that is correct
Explanation:
How were the shooters mentally able to execute women, children and men face-to-face and often with hand pistols 6 to 8 inches from the victims head? Even though the shooters became covered in blood and brains why did they continue to shoot hour after hour, day after day, week after week and month after month? How did German and other shooters justify murder to themselves?
I'm guessing you're talking about WWII and the German's "extermination" of the Jews and other "undesirables"?
Hitler had a strong influence on Germany and Austria even before her rose to power. In his novel, 'Mein Kampf', he blamed the Jews for the loss of WWI, so when he became Chancellor, he made sure the Jews and other "undesirables" were depicted as inhuman. So that, most-likely, made it far easier for soldiers to shoot innocent people with no signs of remorse.
Arrange the events in chronological order.
Answer: Charles II took the English throne.
James II took the English throne.
James II proclaimed religious tolerance without consulting Parliament.
William of Orange came to England
Parliament passed the Bill of Rights
Explanation:
The events in chronological order are: Christopher Columbus discovering the Americas in 1492, the signing of the United States Declaration of Independence in 1776, the end of World War II in 1945, the first man walking on the moon in 1969, the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the September 11 attacks in 2001.
Explanation:1492: Christopher Columbus discovers the Americas1776: The United States Declaration of Independence is signed1945: The end of World War II1969: The first man walks on the moon1991: The fall of the Soviet Union2001: The September 11 attacks on the World Trade CenterLearn more about Chronological order of historical events here:https://brainly.com/question/32377461
#SPJ2
How did southerners respond to the arguments offered by abolitions?
Answer: Southern state legislatures banned antislavery material. Southern hospitality for abolitionists was a rope with a noose or a whip. By the late 1830s, there were no known abolitionists in the South, and northern abolitionists were seen committing acts of violence against the South.
Abolitionists believed that slavery was a national sin and that it was the moral obligation of every American to help eradicate it from the American landscape by gradually freeing the slaves and returning them to Africa..