The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 requires employers to provide benefits to employees who are injured or killed on the job.
The Employees Compensation Act of 1923 was enacted to compensate workers who were injured in the course of their employment due to an accident. It applies to all employees, including those who work part-time, temporarily, or casually.
This act assures that laborers' rights are protected even if they suffer disability or death as a result of an accident at work. The Act also includes provisions for medical and other benefits, such as reimbursement of medical expenses, provision of artificial limbs, and payment of a gratuity.
Therefore, the obligation and rights of employer and employees under the Employees Compensation Act 1923 is mentioned above.
To learn more on Employees Compensation Act, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30269394
#SPJ1
Were American political parties (APPs) stronger in the past, or are they stronger today?
American political parties (APPs) have gone through many changes throughout their history. It is difficult to determine whether they were stronger in the past or are stronger today, as there are many factors to consider.
In the past, APPs had a stronger hold on the electorate. Political parties in the 19th century were closely tied to specific regions, religions, and ethnicities. They were often able to mobilize their supporters effectively through patronage, fundraising, and grassroots organizing. The emergence of strong party machines, such as Tammany Hall in New York City, allowed for party bosses to exert significant control over local politics. However, the 20th century saw a decline in the power of political parties, particularly due to the rise of mass media and the increasing influence of individual candidates. The political parties' role shifted from being the main vehicle for political participation to being more of a support system for individual politicians. This shift in the role of parties has continued to the present day. Today, American political parties still play an important role in the electoral process. However, their influence is often overshadowed by outside groups such as Super PACs and issue advocacy organizations. Additionally, many voters are increasingly independent, and therefore not as likely to identify with one party or the other. This has led to a decline in party loyalty and a rise in candidate-centered campaigns. In conclusion, it is difficult to say whether APPs were stronger in the past or are stronger today. While parties in the past had a more cohesive base of support, they also faced significant challenges in mobilizing voters outside of their traditional constituencies. Today, parties have less control over the political process, but they also have greater flexibility in adapting to changing electoral trends.
Learn more about American political parties here
https://brainly.com/question/25220613
#SPJ11
a plaintiff has sued a defendant, alleging that she was run over by a speeding car driven by the defendant/
The plaintiff has initiated a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging that she was hit by a speeding car driven by the defendant
The plaintiff is the party who files the lawsuit and asks the court to grant them their request, whereas the defendant is the party who is being sued and must refute the claims stated by the plaintiff.
The plaintiff might be able to seek damages from the defendant if she can demonstrate that the defendant was actually operating the vehicle that struck her and that the defendant was moving too quickly. Compensation for medical expenses, lost pay, and pain and suffering are all examples of damages.
The plaintiff may be required to present evidence to support her claims, including witness statements, medical records, any available security film, and police reports.
For such more question on lawsuit:
https://brainly.com/question/30707234
#SPJ11
What national organization in America has done most to defend America against acts of terror, and how do you determine this?
Answer:
an organization chartered by act of the U.SExplanation:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is the national organization in America that has done the most to defend against acts of terror. This is determined by the fact that DHS was created after the 9/11 attacks to lead a unified national effort to secure America against terrorism. DHS is responsible for protecting the country from both domestic and foreign threats, including cybersecurity attacks, natural disasters, and terrorism. The department works closely with federal, state, and local partners to coordinate and implement initiatives to prevent, protect against, and respond to terrorist acts.When the deed of trust is used as the security instrument for a mortgage loan, which of the following is a true statement?
A. The bank gives title to the borrower while the loan is being paid off.
B. It is much easier for a lender to foreclose on a property.
C. A promissory note the borrower has signed gives the lender the right to seize and sell the house should the borrower default.
D. The borrower is considered the owner of the home.
When a deed of trust is used as the security instrument for a mortgage loan, it means that the borrower is giving the lender (or the trustee acting on behalf of the lender) the legal right to hold the title of the property until the loan is paid off. This means that option D, which suggests that the borrower is considered the owner of the home, is not entirely accurate.
Instead, the borrower is still considered the equitable owner of the property, meaning that they have the right to occupy and use the property as if they were the legal owner, but the lender or trustee holds the legal title. This arrangement makes it easier for the lender to foreclose on the property if the borrower defaults on the loan, as they already have legal ownership of the property.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is option B, which states that it is much easier for a lender to foreclose on a property when a deed of trust is used as the security instrument for a mortgage loan. Additionally, it is important to note that a promissory note the borrower has signed does give the lender the right to seize and sell the house should the borrower default, as stated in option C.
Learn more about mortgage here:
https://brainly.com/question/8084409
#SPJ11
When the rule of a specific federal agency permit non-lawyers to practice before it, this rule may be abrogated by state statute.
a. true
b. false
The answer is "true." When a federal agency permits non-lawyers to practice before it, this rule may be abrogated by state statute.
State laws can supersede federal regulations as long as they do not violate the U.S. Constitution or federal laws. Therefore, if a state passes a law that prohibits non-lawyers from practicing before a specific federal agency, then that state law will override the federal agency's rule.
For example, if a state passes a law that requires all representatives appearing before a specific federal agency to have a law degree, then the federal agency's rule allowing non-lawyers to practice before it would be abrogated by the state statute. Similarly, if a state law requires a certain certification or licensing to practice before a federal agency, then the federal agency's rule would be overridden by the state law.
It is important to note that state laws cannot abrogate federal laws or regulations that are based on constitutional authority. Therefore, any state law that conflicts with a federal law or regulation that is based on the Constitution would be considered invalid. In summary, a state statute can abrogate a federal agency's rule that permits non-lawyers to practice before it, but only if it does not violate federal laws or the Constitution.
Learn more about laws :
https://brainly.com/question/29553358
#SPJ11
Significant differences between European political parties & American political parties
The significant differences between European political parties and American political parties can be primarily attributed to the political systems, ideologies, and party structures in each region.
Firstly, European political parties tend to operate in multi-party systems, which encourage a broader range of political ideologies and policy platforms. In contrast, the American political system is a two-party system, dominated by the Democratic and Republican parties, leading to a narrower focus on center-left and center-right policies.Secondly, European political parties often display a wider ideological spectrum, with parties representing socialist, liberal, conservative, green, and far-right movements. American political parties, on the other hand, primarily revolve around the liberal (Democratic) and conservative (Republican) ideologies.Finally, European political parties tend to have more fragmented and coalition-based governments due to the proportional representation voting systems in place. This allows smaller parties to gain representation and influence in policy-making. Conversely, the American political system uses a first-past-the-post electoral system, which reinforces the two-party system and limits the influence of third parties in government.
Learn more about political here
https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ11
The doctrine of the separation of functions in administrative law applioes to an agency's adjudication proceeding but does not apply to its rulemaking proceeding.
A. True
B. False
B. False, the doctrine of the separation of functions in administrative law applies to both an agency's adjudication proceedings and its rulemaking proceedings.
The separation of functions doctrine requires that the decision-making functions of an agency be separate from its investigative and prosecutorial functions. This means that an agency's decision maker should not be involved in the investigation or prosecution of the case. In the context of rulemaking, the doctrine requires that agencies follow certain procedures to ensure that the rulemaking process is fair and unbiased. For example, agencies are required to provide notice and an opportunity for public comment on proposed rules before they are adopted. This helps to ensure that interested parties have the opportunity to provide input and that the agency's decision is based on a full and complete record. Overall, the doctrine of the separation of functions is an important principle in administrative law that helps to ensure the fairness and integrity of the decision-making process.
Learn more about rulemaking here:
https://brainly.com/question/14830512
#SPJ11
Factors influencing whether a servant is acting within the scope of employment include all but which of the following?
a.
The act is similar to the one the principal authorized.
b.
The act is not seriously criminal.
c.
The act took place during hours that the servant is generally employed.
d.
All of the answer choices are factors in determining if an act is "within the scope of employment."
Answer:D
Hope it helped
d. All of the answer choices are factors in determining if an act is "within the scope of employment." All of the given answer choices are factors that influence whether a servant is acting within the scope of employment.
It is stated that factors influencing whether a servant is acting within the scope of employment include all but which of the following. The options given include a, b, c, and d.
Option a states that the act is similar to the one the principal authorized, which is a factor in determining if an act is within the scope of employment. Option b states that the act is not seriously criminal, which is also a factor. Option c states that the act took place during hours that the servant is generally employed, which is another factor.
To know more about scope of employment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30789519
#SPJ11
in a mortgage loan, the borrower always creates two documents: a note and a mortgage. which of the following pieces of information is provided in the mortgage?
Answer:A:
An unambiguous description of the property that is being pledged as collateral for the loan.
hope it helped
In a mortgage loan, the mortgage typically provides information about the property that is being mortgaged, such as its legal description, the amount of the loan, the interest rate, the term of the loan, and the rights and obligations of both the borrower and the lender
The mortgage typically provides information about the property being mortgaged, such as its address and legal description, the name of the borrower and lender, the loan amount, interest rate, payment terms, and the conditions under which the lender may foreclose on the property if the borrower defaults on the loan. It also establishes the rights and obligations of both the borrower and the lender, such as the requirement for the borrower to maintain insurance on the property and pay property taxes. The mortgage may also include provisions for prepayment penalties, late fees, and other charges related to the loan.
Learn more about interest here:
https://brainly.com/question/30393144
#SPJ11
Bobby and Fredrick specify in their contract that for every day Bobby's construction company does not complete Fredrick's new house, Bobby will deduct $1000. This is known as a _______ damages clause.
Bobby and Fredrick's contract includes a liquidated damages clause, which specifies the amount of money that will be deducted by Bobby's construction company if they fail to complete Fredrick's new house within the agreed-upon timeframe. In this case, the liquidated damages clause stipulates that $1000 will be deducted for each day the construction is delayed.
This type of clause is often included in contracts to provide an incentive for the party responsible for completing the work to do so in a timely manner, as well as to compensate the other party for any losses incurred due to the delay. The inclusion of a liquidated damages clause can help to avoid lengthy legal disputes over the exact amount of damages suffered as a result of the delay, as the parties have agreed upon a specific amount in advance.
Overall, the use of liquidated damages clauses can be an effective way to manage risk in contractual agreements, particularly in situations where the timely completion of work is critical.
Learn more about construction here:
https://brainly.com/question/14249780
#SPJ11
Understanding business and personal law Section 16.1
Assessment
Reviewing What You Learned
1. What six aspects of the loan agreement should you be sure you understand before you sign the loan documents?
2. What should you do before you buy a new car?
3. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of leasing a car.
4. Why might it be risky to purchase a pre-owned vehicle from a private party?
5. What should you do if you buy a defective car?
6. What is the purpose of the federal odometer law?
7. Why do some states require auto repair shops to be bonded?
Understand loan terms before signing. Research before buying a car. Pre-approved financing is vital. Leasing a car has benefits like lower payments and a new car every few years.
What is the law?Leasing has mileage restrictions, excess wear and tear fees, and no ownership at the end. Buying used from a private seller can be risky. "Get inspection and history report before buying a car. Legal options if defective under state laws."
Contact the seller and seek legal assistance to resolve the issue as per federal odometer law. To prevent odometer fraud and ensure accurate vehicle history for buyers. Some states require bonded repair shops to protect consumers. Shop buys bond to compensate customers for issues.
Learn more about personal law from
https://brainly.com/question/1189272
#SPJ1
a third-class medical certificate is issued to a 36-year-old pilot on august 10, this year. to exercise the privileges of a private pilot certificate, the medical certificate will be valid until midnight on
a)August 10, three years later. B)August 31, three years later.
C) August 31, five years later.
If a third-class medical certificate is issued to a 36-year-old pilot on August 10, then the medical certificate will be valid until midnight on August 31, five years later. The correct answer is option C.
The validity period of a third-class medical certificate for a pilot under the age of 40 is 60 calendar months (5 years).
A third-class medical certificate issued to a 36-year-old pilot on August 10th will be valid for a duration of 60 calendar months when exercising the privileges of a private pilot certificate. To determine the expiration date, you should count 60 months (5 years) from the month of issuance, which takes you to August of the fifth year after the certificate was issued.
Since the medical certificate is valid until the last day of the month, it will expire at midnight on August 31st, five years later. So, the correct answer is:
C) August 31, five years later.
Learn more about the third-class medical certificate:
https://brainly.com/question/14101948
#SPJ11
Raising the rent of a public housing tenant is a sufficient invasion of privacy interests by the supervisory administrative agency that requires a trial-type hearing
A. True
B. False
B. False. While raising the rent of a public housing tenant may impact their privacy interests, it does not necessarily require a trial-type hearing by a supervisory administrative agency. The decision to raise rent would typically fall under the agency's regular administrative processes and procedures.
While the supervisory administrative agency is responsible for overseeing public housing and implementing changes such as raising the rent, it is not considered a sufficient invasion of privacy interests to require a trial-type hearing. Typically, rent adjustments in public housing follow established guidelines and procedures, ensuring fairness without the need for a trial-type hearing.
Learn more about trial-type hearing here: brainly.com/question/9875852
#SPJ11
In a divorce, to obtain custody, the genetic father has to convince the court of his fitness and ability to care for his child, whereas if the mother decides to keep her child, she need not legally demonstrate her fitness (True or False)
Answer:False
Explanation: In a divorce or child custody case, both parents may be required to demonstrate their fitness to care for their child. Gender is not a determining factor in custody decisions. Courts consider factors such as the parents' ability to provide a stable home environment, their involvement in the child's life, their mental and physical health, and the child's best interests. While mothers historically have been more likely to be awarded custody in the past, that is not always the case today. The court's primary concern is the well-being and safety of the child, and custody decisions are made on a case-by-case basis.
The court will never look at adequacy of consideration as long as at least one party has given some detriment.
This statement is generally true. In contract law, consideration refers to the exchange of something of value between the parties involved.
For a contract to be legally binding, there must be consideration from both sides. The court typically does not scrutinize the adequacy of consideration as long as there is some form of detriment or benefit given by at least one party. This means that even if one party receives a seemingly unfair or unequal exchange, as long as they gave something of value in return, the court will not intervene. However, there are certain circumstances where the court may consider the adequacy of consideration, such as cases of duress, fraud, or undue influence.
Your question involves the concept of consideration in contract law. To answer, the court typically does not evaluate the adequacy of consideration, as long as at least one party has provided something of value or incurred a detriment, which is required for a legally binding contract. The focus is on the existence of consideration rather than its adequacy, ensuring that both parties are committed to the agreement.
Visit here to learn more about contract law brainly.com/question/14316157
#SPJ11
A primary reason why destructive leaders seek power is to use it ______.
A- to help others
B- to change the world
C- for organizational profit
D- for personal gain
The primary reason why destructive leaders seek power is for personal gain. Option D
Who are destructive leaders?Destructive leaders are individuals who use their power and influence in ways that are harmful to their organizations, employees, or society as a whole.
They may seek power for a variety of reasons, including a desire for personal gain, such as financial or material benefits, prestige, or control over others.
Destructive leaders are often motivated by their own self-interest, and they may use their power to manipulate others, engage in unethical or illegal activities.
Learn more about destructive leaders at https://brainly.com/question/28270734
#SPJ1
The Sunshine Act requires that advisory committees must hold open meetings.
a. true
b. false
What does an injured plaintiff need to prove to a court in order to claim duress?
In order for an injured plaintiff to claim duress, they need to prove to the court that they were subjected to a threat or coercion that made them act against their will.
An injured plaintiff is a person who has suffered harm or injury as a result of the actions or negligence of another party and brings a legal claim seeking compensation for their losses. The plaintiff may be injured physically, emotionally, or financially, and their injuries may be caused by a variety of incidents, such as a car accident, medical malpractice, or a defective product. In a legal case, the injured plaintiff is the party bringing the lawsuit against the defendant, who is alleged to have caused the injury. The plaintiff's goal is typically to obtain compensation for their damages, which may include medical expenses, lost income, pain, and suffering, and other losses resulting from the injury.
Learn more about the injured plaintiff here:
https://brainly.com/question/30871950
#SPJ11
Painted House] Jamal had a contract to paint Stephanie’s house for $800. His contractual obligations included cleaning up any debris. The contract between Jamal and Stephanie did not in any way address assignment. Jamal, who was very busy, assigned the contract to Greg who was interested in making some extra money and had experience painting. Jamal specified that the contract included the duty to paint the house and the right to receive the money. Jamal did not tell Stephanie about the assignment because he did not want any trouble. Greg also did not mention the assignment to Stephanie. In fact, Greg never met Stephanie because he painted her house while she was at work. After Greg did a good job painting the house, Stephanie sent a check to Jamal for $800. Jamal needed the money to pay some bills, so he spent it. He thought he would have money coming in with which to pay Greg, but that did not happen. Greg asked Stephanie for $800 when it was not forthcoming from Jamal. Stephanie refused. Greg said that he was going to sue her. Stephanie called Jamal and told him that he had no right to assign the contract. In addition, there was another problem involving the disposal of debris. Although Greg was a good, competent painter, he forgot and left some old paint cans at Stephanie's house. Stephanie demanded that Jamal come and properly dispose of the paint cans because they could not simply be put in the trash. Jamal refused and told her that she would have to get Greg to dispose of the paint cans because that was his responsibility. Stephanie called Greg who told her that he was busy and that clearing out the paint cans was Jamal's responsibility.
What would be the likely result of a lawsuit brought by Greg against Stephanie to recover the $800?
Multiple Choice
Stephanie will win only so long as the assignment was for an amount over $500.
Greg will win because Stephanie accepted the risk that the contract would be assigned.
Greg will win only so long as Jamal has not been declared bankrupt because Stephanie will be able to recover the amounts at issue from Jamal.
Greg will win only so long as the assignment was for an amount under $1,000.
Stephanie will win because she had no notice that the contract had been assigned and could, therefore, legally satisfy her obligations by paying Jamal.
Stephanie will win because she had no notice that the contract had been assigned and could, therefore, legally satisfy her obligations by paying Jamal. Greg cannot sue Stephanie for the $800 because the contract was not assignable without Stephanie's consent, and she did not consent to the assignment.
Jamal's failure to inform Stephanie of the assignment means that Stephanie was not aware of the change in the contracting party. Therefore, Stephanie was legally justified in paying Jamal and has satisfied her contractual obligations. Greg's only recourse is to sue Jamal for breach of contract, as he was the original party to the contract. The issue with the disposal of debris is a separate matter, and Greg is responsible for properly disposing of the paint cans as he was the one who left them behind. Jamal's refusal to take responsibility for the debris does not relieve Greg of his duty to properly dispose of it.
Learn more about assignment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29736210
#SPJ11
a novation occurs when there is a subtitution by agreement of a new contract for an old one with the rights under the old one being terminated,. True or False
True, A novation is a legal concept that refers to the substitution of a new contract for an old one, with the rights and obligations under the old contract being terminated and replaced by those under the new contract.
Novation typically occurs when a new party takes over the obligations of the original party to a contract, with the consent of all parties involved.
This may happen, for example, when a business is sold, and the new owner takes over the contracts of the old owner, or when a contractor hires a subcontractor to perform part of the work under an existing contract.
The novation agreement must be in writing and signed by all parties involved, and it must clearly identify the old and new contracts and the parties involved in the novation.
To know more about novation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28233329
#SPJ11
Carrie and Peter enter into a contract in which Carrie agrees to wash Peter's car if Peter tutors her son in math and her son gets at least a B+. This is an example of which type of conditional contract?
Answer:
This is an example of a bilateral condition precedent contract, where both parties must perform their obligations before the other is required to perform. In this case, Carrie's obligation to wash Peter's car is conditional upon Peter's obligation to tutor her son and the son achieving at least a B+.
This is an example of a unilateral contract.promise in exchange for the performance of an act by another party
A unilateral contract is a type of contract in which one party makes a promise in exchange for the performance of an act by another party. In this case, Carrie is making a promise to wash Peter's car in exchange for Peter tutoring her son and her son getting at least a B+. The contract becomes binding only when the act is performed by the other party, in this case, Peter's tutoring and the son getting a B+. Until then, Carrie is under no obligation to wash Peter's car. Unilateral contracts are often used in situations where the act to be performed is something that only one party can do, such as painting a picture or finding a lost object.
Learn more about unilateral contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/9129483
#SPJ11
By authority of Congress, the president may create an administrative agency by executive order.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Administrative agencies are created by Congress through enabling legislation. The President does not have the authority to create an administrative agency by executive order.
False. By authority of Congress, the president may create an administrative agency by executive order.
The creation of administrative agencies is a function of Congress, not the president. Under the United States Constitution, Congress has the power to make laws, and it is through this power that Congress creates and empowers administrative agencies. These agencies are tasked with implementing and enforcing laws, regulations, and policies that are within their jurisdiction.
The president can influence the operations of administrative agencies by appointing and removing the agency's leaders, but the creation of an agency is beyond the scope of presidential power. In other words, the president cannot unilaterally create an administrative agency by executive order.
The creation of an administrative agency typically requires a statute enacted by Congress. This statute will define the agency's purpose, scope of authority, and structure. Once created, an administrative agency will operate within the boundaries set by Congress and subject to the review of the federal courts.
It is important to note that the president may issue executive orders to direct administrative agencies to carry out specific tasks or actions. These orders must, however, be within the scope of the agency's statutory authority and may not create new authority or duties for the agency.
Learn more about Congress here:
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ11
Why do parties who are not in privity of contract usually not have rights to a contract?
Answer:
Parties who are not in privity of contract usually do not have rights to a contract because they are not directly involved in the agreement and have not provided any consideration. Privity of contract refers to the legal relationship between the parties who have entered into a contract and are bound by its terms. These parties have made promises and exchanged consideration, and the law recognizes their rights and obligations to each other.
On the other hand, third parties who are not in privity of contract have not made any promises or provided any consideration and therefore do not have the same legal rights as the parties to the contract. Exceptions to this general rule include situations where a third party is a beneficiary of the contract or has a legal duty that arises from the contract, but these exceptions are limited and specific.
Parties who are not in privity of contract usually do not have rights to a contract because they are not directly involved or named in the contract.
Privity of contract refers to the legal relationship that exists between the parties to a contract. These parties have mutual rights and obligations under the contract, and they can sue each other for breach of contract or seek specific performance of the contract.
A third party who is not named in the contract does not have privity of contract and therefore has no direct rights or obligations under the contract. Exceptions to this general rule include situations where the third party is a beneficiary of the contract, such as in a life insurance policy where the named beneficiary has rights to the policy. Another exception may occur when a third party is assigned the rights to a contract, such as in an assignment of a lease. However, absent such exceptions, parties who are not in privity of contract typically do not have rights to a contract.
Learn more about obligations here:
https://brainly.com/question/11301585
#SPJ11
What was the Nuremberg trials and its impact on international law?
The Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials held in Nuremberg, Germany, from 1945 to 1949 to prosecute Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity and other violations of international law.
The trials were held in the Nuremberg Palace of Justice and conducted by an international tribunal made up of representatives from the Allied powers, including the Soviet Union, the United States, Britain, France and China.
The Nuremberg Trials had a significant impact on the development of international law, particularly in the areas of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The trials established that individuals could be held responsible for their actions, regardless of their official position or rank, and provided a legal framework for the prosecution of those responsible for atrocities.
know more about Nazi officials here
https://brainly.com/question/30057210#
#SPJ11
Individuals who are approaching termination for cause should be allowed to resign in lieu of discharge. (T/F)
This statement is generally true. Allowing individuals who are facing termination for cause to resign in lieu of discharge can be a mutually beneficial option for both the employee and the employer.
From the employee's perspective, resigning allows them to avoid having a termination for cause on their employment record, which can be damaging to future job prospects. Individuals who are approaching termination for cause should be allowed to resign in lieu of discharge From the employer's perspective, accepting a resignation can avoid the potential legal complications that can come with a termination for cause, as well as potentially providing the employer with a smoother transition process. However, it is important to note that this is not always the case and there may be situations where termination for cause is necessary and appropriate.
Learn more about employee here:
https://brainly.com/question/31437753
#SPJ11
identity federation is not in essence an extension of identity management to multiple security domains.True or False
False. Identity federation is, in essence, an extension of identity management to multiple security domains.
Identity federation allows a user to use a single set of credentials, such as a username and password, to access multiple systems or services across different security domains. This is made possible through the use of standards-based protocols and technologies, such as Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) and OAuth, which enable the exchange of authentication and authorization information between systems in a secure and standardized manner.
By extending identity management across multiple security domains, identity federation helps simplify the user experience, reduce the need for multiple sets of credentials, and improve security by centralizing control and visibility over user access and permissions.
True, identity federation is indeed an extension of identity management to multiple security domains.
Identity management refers to the process of creating, maintaining, and securing digital identities for users within an organization. It involves authenticating users, authorizing their access to resources, and managing their credentials.
Multiple security domains are separate environments with distinct sets of security policies, procedures, and controls. These domains may belong to different organizations, which collaborate and exchange information while maintaining their respective security requirements.
Identity federation comes into play when users need access to resources across these multiple security domains. It enables seamless and secure sharing of identity information between collaborating organizations, allowing users to authenticate in their home domain and access resources in other domains without needing separate credentials. This streamlines the user experience and simplifies access management for organizations, while still ensuring robust security.
In summary, identity federation is an extension of identity management that allows secure and efficient access to resources across multiple security domains. This enables organizations to collaborate more effectively without compromising on security.
To learn more about identity management, visit: https://brainly.com/question/31085642
#SPJ11
The decisions of most administrative agencies are reviewed de novo on the record.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The decisions of most administrative agencies are not reviewed de novo on the record. The standard of review may vary depending on the agency and the issue being reviewed, but it is usually deferential and requires the court to give some level of deference to the agency's decision.
B. False The statement "The decisions of most administrative agencies are reviewed de novo on the record" is false. In general, administrative agency decisions are not reviewed de novo. Instead, they are reviewed under the "substantial evidence" or "arbitrary and capricious" standards of review.
De novo review means that the reviewing court examines the issue as if it were considering it for the first time, without any deference to the lower court or administrative agency. However, most administrative decisions receive deference from the courts because the agencies have specialized expertise in their respective fields. Evidence is considered to be substantial when it provides a considerable base of fact from which arguments put forth can be rationally answered. It must also have some relevance and substance. Although less than a preponderance, the evidence is sufficient to establish a conclusion in a reasonable mind. As used in these standards, "substantial evidence" is defined as sufficient pertinent data and justifiable law inferences from said data to allow a fair case to be made in favor of a conclusion, even while other conclusions may also be drawn. The lead agency will review the entire file to assess whether a valid claim can be made that the project would have a major environmental impact.
Learn more about law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30561419
#SPJ11
Recommendations are made by individuals, groups, or agencies that are advisory and ________________ with regard to enforcement.
Recommendations are made by individuals, groups, or agencies that are advisory and nonbinding with regard to enforcement.
This indicates that the provided recommendations are optional and do not carry any legal weight.
What is their purpose?Proposals are non-restricting instruments which have no lawful power except for are simply influential.
They basically permit the EU foundations to spread the word and to recommend a line of activity without forcing any legitimate commitment on those to whom they are tended to.
However, when interpreting EU law, the Court of Justice has been known to use Recommendations.
Hence, the answer to the blank is non-binding.
To know more about Recommendations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30055998
#SPJ11
True or False? The FTC recommends that people place an initial fraud alert (among other things) when they suspect they are victims of identity theft.
True. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recommends that people place an initial fraud alert on their credit reports if they suspect they are victims of identity theft. This is one of the steps recommended by the FTC to help protect against further damage to their credit and personal information. An initial fraud alert can help alert creditors to verify your identity before opening new accounts, extending credit, or increasing credit limits.
What does it mean to measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy"?
To measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy" it is to compare the size of the deficit to the productivity . Thus, option A is correct. Therefore, option A is correct.
Every time the federal government's expenditure outweighs tax receipts and other sources of money, a budget deficit results. The US Treasury distributes treasury bills, written notes, and bonds to cover the shortfall.
The sum of the annual budget deficits of the United States of America, less the infrequent surpluses to occur is known as the national debt. It serves as a gauge for the total amount of funding the federal government will require.
Learn more about deficit, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29602763
#SPJ1
The question is incomplete, Complete question probably will be is:
What does it mean to measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy"?
to compare the size of the deficit to the productivity
to compare the size of the deficit to the unemployment rate
to measure the deficit as a percentage of the economy or GDP
to measure the deficit as a percentage of tax revenues