helphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelphelp

79.45401²

[tex]1)\ V=B\ Sh[/tex]

[tex]\therefore\ V=3.15\times 3.75\times 5.65[/tex]

[tex]=79.403125[/tex]

[tex]\approx 79,45\ cm^3[/tex]

I hope this helps you

:)

Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the volume of the prism is approximately 79.50 cm^3.

To find the volume of a prism, we use the formula:

Volume = Base Area * Height

In this case, the prism has a square base with each side of length 3.75 cm and a height of 5.65 cm. The formula for the area of a square is:

Base Area = Side Length^2

So, the base area can be calculated as:

Base Area = 3.75 cm * 3.75 cm = 14.0625 cm^2

Now, we can find the volume using the formula:

Volume = Base Area * Height

Volume = 14.0625 cm^2 * 5.65 cm

Volume ≈ 79.5025 cm^3

To know more about volume:

https://brainly.com/question/32006008

#SPJ2

Answer:

A. Directions: Encircle the letter of the correct answers

Step-by-step explanation:

1.the I in resign sounds like the I in.

A. hit B. High

Answer:

7 1/8

Step-by-step explanation:

1 1/8 + 1 1/8 is 2 2/8

2 2/8 + 4 7/8 is 6 9/8 = 7 1/8

Answer:

[tex]u^2+3u+9[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The way to remember it, is like the square of a binomial, but all coefficients are 1.

So it's the square of the first term. The cross product. The square of the second. And you take only one of them.

In our situation is [tex]u^2+3u+9[/tex]

If you want a way to find it, the way you think is it. It's a second degree polynomial, so [tex]au^2+bu+c[/tex]. Then you multiply the terms together, and you have to get terms removing in a way that you're left with just [tex]u^3-27[/tex]. With some number crunching you'll end up with [tex]a=1; b=3, c=9[/tex]

Answer:

Sample 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Total left

Answer:

[tex]4\:\dfrac{2}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Add the amounts of each pie left :

[tex]2 \frac{1}{4}+\dfrac{2}{4}+1 \frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Separate the whole numbers and the fractions:

[tex]\implies 2+ \dfrac{1}{4}+\dfrac{2}{4}+1+\dfrac{3}{4}[/tex]

Add the whole numbers and fractions separately:

[tex]\implies 2+1+\dfrac{1}{4}+\dfrac{2}{4}+\dfrac{3}{4}[/tex]

[tex]\implies 3+\dfrac{6}{4}[/tex]

Convert 6/4 into a mixed number:

[tex]\implies 3+1\frac{2}{4}[/tex]

Add the whole numbers:

[tex]\implies 4\frac{2}{4}[/tex]

Answer:

  a. (4, 26)

  b. The number of people jogging in 2004 was 26 million.

  c. 43 million

Step-by-step explanation:

To complete the ordered pair, use the given first value of the pair as the value of the variable in the equation. Evaluate the equation to find the second value of the ordered pair:

  y = x +22

  y = 4 +22 = 26

The ordered pair is (4, 26).

__

The ordered pair tells you (years after 2000, number of joggers in millions). That means the ordered pair (4, 26) tells you 4 years after 2000, there were 26 million joggers.

__

21 years after 2000, the value of x is 21, so the value of y is ...

  y = 21 +22 = 43

There will be 43 million joggers in 2021.

Answer:

>

Step-by-step explanation:

Negative is that amount below zero. For example -3 is 0 - 3. This means that since -3 is 3 less than 0, -3 < 0. This can also be said as 0 > -3.

Answer:

Answer: 0 (> )-3

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps

This is the same as saying 0.2659 < p < 0.4541

=========================================================

Work Shown:

At 95% confidence, the z critical value is about z = 1.96 which is determined through a table or calculator.

x = number of people who had kids = 36

n = sample size = 100

phat = sample proportion of those who had kids

phat = x/n

phat = 36/100

phat = 0.36

E = margin of error

E = z*sqrt(phat*(1-phat)/n)

E = 1.96*sqrt(0.36*(1-0.36)/100)

E = 0.09408

This value of E is approximate because z = 1.96 is approximate.

-------------

L = lower bound

L = phat - E

L = 0.36 - 0.09408

L = 0.26592

L = 0.2659

U = upper bound

U = phat + E

U = 0.36 + 0.09408

U = 0.45408

U = 0.4541

The values of L and U are approximate since E is approximate.

-------------

The confidence interval in the format (L, U) is (0.2659, 0.4541)

This is equivalent to writing 0.2659 < p < 0.4541

which is the format L < p < U

We're 95% confident that the true population proportion (p) is somewhere between 0.2659 and 0.4541; i.e. we're 95% confident the true percentage of people who had kids is somewhere between 26.59% and 45.41%

Answer:

where is the figure

pls send it

Using the binomial distribution, it is found that there is a 0.0058 = 0.58% probability that the sample contains exactly two defective parts.

The formula is:

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

The parameters are:

In this problem, we want P(X = 2) with p = 0.025, n = 5, hence:

[tex]P(X = 2) = C_{5,2}.(0.025)^{2}.(0.975)^{3} = 0.0058[/tex]

There is a 0.0058 = 0.58% probability that the sample contains exactly two defective parts.

More can be learned about the binomial distribution at https://brainly.com/question/24863377

Answer:

A. The solution is the region where both shaded parts overlap.

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution to a system of linear inequalities is the intersection region of the solution of both inequalities. Or you could also say that it's the region where the graphs of the inequalities in the system overlap.

The shaded area represents the solution and where the two inequalities overlap.

Answer:

2.25 tablespoons of oregano

Step-by-step explanation:

as Diego use 3x more than Tracy, and you know that Tracy use 0.75 tablespoon, so 0.75 x 3 and you will get 2.25

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]a)\\\\(x+2)(x+5)\\\\=x(x+5) + 2(x+5)\\\\=x^2+5x+2x+10\\\\=x^2+7x+10\\\\\\b)\\\\(x+2)(x-3)\\\\=x(x-3)+2(x-3)\\\\=x^2-3x+2x-6\\\\=x^2-x-6[/tex]

≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡

1a) (x + 2)(x + 5)

⇒ (x × x) + (5 × x) + (2 × x) + (2 × 5)

⇒ (x²) + (5x) + (2x) + (10)

⇒ (x²) + (5 + 2)x + (10)

⇒ (x²) + (7)x + (10)

≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡

1b) (x + 2)(x - 3)

⇒ (x × x) + (-3 × x) + (2 × x) + (2 × -3)

⇒ (x²) + (-3x) + (2x) + (-6)

⇒ (x²) + (-3 + 2)x + (-6)

⇒ x² + (-1)x - 6 = x² - x - 6

≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡

Answer:

I believe your answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Rise is over run, the run (x) is increasing by five but, the rise (y) is decreasing by 8 so the answer would be -8/5

Hope this helps! :)

Given the current yield to maturity of the bond, the price of the bond five years for now is $883.10.

The first step is to determine the yield to maturity of the bond. The yield to maturity is the return on the bond if the bond is held to matuity.

Yield to matuity can be determined using a financial calculator:

Cash flow in year 0 = -875

Cash flow each year from year 1 to 25 = 85

Cash flow in year 25 = $1000

Yield to matuity = 9.86%

Future price of the bond: (coupon x future price factor) + [FV / (1 + YTM)^n)]

Future price factor = [1 - (1/YTM)^n] / YTM

= [1 - 1/0.0986^20] 0.0986 = 8.595555

[85 x 8.595555 ] + 152.478323 = $883.10

To learn more about yield to maturity, please check: https://brainly.com/question/26484024

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the question,

Let the width of rectangle be x and length of rectangle be 3x

Perimeter of Rectangle :- 2(L+B) = 64 in

Putting the values we get ,

2(3x+x) = 64 in

8x = 64 in

x = 8 in

Putting the value of x ,

Width :- 8 Inch

Length :- 24 inch

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] Length(l) of the rectangle is three times it's width(w) = 3w.

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] Width(w) of the rectangle = w.

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] Perimeter of the rectangle = 64in.

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]Length and width of the rectangle.

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] Perimeter of rectangle = [tex]\sf{2(l+w)}[/tex] putting the value of perimeter, l and w from the above given)

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] 64 = [tex]\sf{2(3w+w)}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] 64 = [tex]\sf{2(4w)}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] 64 = [tex]\sf{8w}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\sf{\frac{64}{8}}[/tex]= [tex]\sf{w}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\sf{8}[/tex]= [tex]\sf{w}[/tex]

Therefore, width of the rectangle = 8in.

And Length = 3(8)in. = 24in.

To check whether the answer is correct or not, we can put the value of length and width in the formula = [tex]\sf{2(l+w)}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\sf{=\: 2(24+8)}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\sf{=\: 2(32)}[/tex]

[tex]\rightarrow[/tex] [tex]\sf{=\: 64in.}[/tex]

Since, the perimeter of the rectangle is same as given in the question, therefore the value of length and width are correct.

_______________________________

Hope it helps you:)

Answer:

12 cm

Explanation:

The formula or method to find the area of any shape is to go around the shape.

In this case, they are 3, 4 and 5.

p = 3 + 4 + 5

p = 12 cm

The actual distance between the cities is 200 km using multiplication.

The scale of the map is 3 cm : 20 km. This means that for every 3 cm on the map, the actual distance in real life is 20 km.

If two cities are 30 cm apart on the map, we can use the scale to find the actual distance between them. First, we need to determine how many times the scale goes into the distance on the map. To do this, we divide the distance on the map by the length of the scale:

30 cm ÷ 3 cm/20 km = 30 ÷ 3 × 20 = 200 km

Therefore, the actual distance between the two cities is 200 km.

Alternatively, we can use the proportionality between the scale and the actual distance to set up a proportion and solve for the actual distance. Let x be the actual distance between the cities in kilometers:

3 cm / 20 km = 30 cm / x

Cross-multiplying and solving for x, we get:

x = (20 km / 3 cm) × 30 cm = 200 km

Learn more about distance here:

https://brainly.com/question/15172156

#SPJ1

Answer:

3,1,5

Step-by-step explanation: