It was on this day in 1974 that the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a fatal blow to President Richard Nixon’s presidency, in a decision that led to the release of the Watergate tapes.
The case of United States v. Nixon reached the Court on July 8, 1974, after it had concluded its prior term. The Justices found themselves in new territory as the Court had to deal with an executive privilege claim filed by President Nixon’s attorneys.
A grand jury had returned indictments against seven Nixon aides, including former Attorney General John Mitchell, as part of the Watergate investigation. Leon Jaworski, a special prosecutor appointed by President Nixon, and the seven defendants wanted access to audio tapes of conversations recorded by President Nixon in the White House.
Nixon argued that the concept of executive privilege gave him the power to withhold sensitive information, such as tapes, from other government branches in order to maintain confidential communications within the executive branch and to secure the national interest.
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Court (with Justice Rehnquist not taking part due to a prior role in the Nixon administration) ruled against the President. Chief Justice Warren Burger said that the President didn’t have an absolute, unqualified privilege to withhold information.
“We conclude that when the ground for asserting privilege as to subpoenaed materials sought for use in a criminal trial is based only on the generalized interest in confidentiality, it cannot prevail over the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice. The generalized assertion of privilege must yield to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial,” Burger said.
As the Supreme Court drama was unfolding, the House Judiciary Committee worked on three articles of impeachment against President Nixon. The evidence on the tapes was critical to the impending House impeachment proceedings against Nixon.
The Court ordered the tapes released as soon as possible after a judge had listened to the tapes to decide they were relevant to the trial of the former Nixon aides. About two weeks after the Supreme Court’s decision, President Nixon resigned from office.
The Sons of Liberty were part of the
d how it did.
A. resistance
B. slavery
C. scholar
D. new world
movement, which preceded the Revolutionary War and had a large impact on making the Revolution happen when
Answer:c
Explanation:
the supreme court’s ruling in brown vs. board of education commonlit answers
According to the Browns, for education to be equitable, children from all racial backgrounds must attend the same school and have access to the same facilities and opportunities.
How is Brown v. Board of Education affecting society today?In the landmark case Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that American state laws requiring racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated institutions are otherwise of similar quality.
But Brown also had an unanticipated result, and the effects of that are still being felt today: it prompted a number of seasoned, highly trained black educators who worked in schools with only black children to resign, be demoted, or lose their jobs.
Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education: https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ1
A child's adoptive parents go to court to finalize the child's adoption. This court would most likely be a court with which jurisdiction?
Answer: a court of limited jurisdiction
Explanation:
The court with jurisdiction over the adoption of a child by their adoptive parents would typically be a family court or an adoption court within the state or jurisdiction where the child resides. In the United States, each state has its own laws and procedures governing adoption, and the adoption process typically involves various legal steps, including the termination of the birth parents' parental rights, a home study to evaluate the prospective adoptive parents, and a finalization hearing where a judge will review the adoption petition and issue a final order of adoption. The specific court with jurisdiction may vary depending on the state and the circumstances of the adoption, but it will generally be a court that handles family law matters.
Answer:
family / juvenile court
Explanation:
The court with jurisdiction to finalize a child's adoption by their adoptive parents would typically be a family court or juvenile court in the state where the child resides. The specific court may vary depending on the state and local laws governing adoption proceedings, but in general, family or juvenile courts have jurisdiction over matters related to child welfare and adoption. These courts have the authority to review and approve or deny adoption petitions, to terminate parental rights, and to ensure that the adoption process is carried out in the best interests of the child.
What shift in economic focus was enabled through the emancipation of the serfs?
A.) It created a new labor pool no longer tied to agriculture
B.) It supported new methods of farming
C.) It established a new consumer base for manufactured goods
Answer: A
Explanation:
because It created a labor pool not tied to agriculture.
According to the authors of the Declaration of Independence, separating from the British government was:
O immoral.
against God's will.
Onecessary and the right of the people.
None of these choices are correct.
Answer:
1. by listing each of the king’s crimes in a unique sentence to emphasize how he has abused his power
2.to defend the decision to separate from British rule
to emphasize the cruelty and oppression of the king’s rule
3.The actions of King George have made it necessary for America to reject British rule.
4.He believes America’s only recourse is to declare war on the British.
5.“What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: It is dearness only that gives every thing its value.”
“Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”
6. He has no interest in political power.
7. No- After being away for so long, Washington longs to return home.
No – Fame and fortune motivate Washington to seek the presidency.
Yes- Washington’s strength and humility are unrivaled.
Yes – America has earned its freedom, thanks to Washington
Yes – Washington has made America a model for liberty around the world.
8. It emphasizes the author’s reverence for Washington.
9. The poems assert that Washington will inspire other nations to seek freedom.
“On other worlds he lights his fires: / Cold climes beneath his influence glow, / And frozen rivers learn to flow.”
“Fix'd are the eyes of nations on the scales, / For in their hopes Columbia's arm prevails.”
Explanation:
Select from the drop-down menu to correctly complete the sentence. The Civil War ended when Choose... surrendered at Appomattox Court House.
As Robert E. Lee gave up at Appomattox Court House, the Civil War came to an end.
Did the Civil War finish when Lee submitted at Appomattox?Robert E. Lee's surrender to Ulysses S. Grant on April 9, 1865, officially put an end to the Civil War, while other southern armies continued to give up until May. It is one of the most significant moments in American history.
How does Appomattox bring an end to the Civil War?The Confederate General Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia was surrendered to the Union General Ulysses S. Grant after the Battle of Appomattox Court House, which took place on April 9, 1865, close to the town of Appomattox Court House, Virginia.
To know more about Civil War visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ1
Military reasons for colonization of Africa
The colonization of Africa by European powers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was motivated by various factors, including economic, political, social, and military reasons. Military reasons were particularly important in driving European expansion in Africa. Here are some of the military reasons for colonization of Africa:
Strategic location: European powers sought to establish military bases along the African coast to protect their sea lanes and trade routes. These bases also allowed them to project their military power and influence into the interior of Africa.Natural resources: Africa was rich in natural resources such as minerals, timber, and rubber, which were essential for the production of modern weaponry. European powers sought to control these resources to maintain their military dominance.Competition between European powers: European powers were engaged in intense competition for power and influence in the world. Control of African territories provided a means for them to gain an advantage over their rivals.Missionary activities: Christian missionaries were often the first Europeans to establish a presence in many parts of Africa. They were protected by their home governments, and their activities often led to the establishment of military outposts to protect them.Slave trade: The slave trade had been a significant source of wealth for European powers for centuries. The abolition of the slave trade in the 19th century led to the need for new sources of labor, which could be secured through colonization and forced labor.In summary, military reasons played a significant role in the colonization of Africa. European powers sought to establish military bases, control natural resources, gain an advantage over their rivals, protect Christian missionaries, and secure sources of labor. The consequences of colonization for Africa were profound and long-lasting, with impacts on political, economic, social, and cultural development.
how did the German delegation leaders's views support Hobson's theories?
2. Use the map to help you answer the question: Why did the United States want
Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines?
The U.S new naval bases in the Pacific and new territory for business.
O The U.S. needed to spread communism.
O The U.S. should be the first Western country to build a colonial empire.
O The U.S. wanted more options for Americans to go on vacation.
Answer:
(B) The U.S should be the first Western country to build a colonial empire.
Explanation:
During that point the United States was very aggressive with their foreign policies. They wanted control of strategic locations. Plus the U.S. is a democratic nation who fought the spread of communism.
what new communist superpower emerged in east asia in 1949
Answer:
china
Explanation:
Which section of the article introduces a point of view that supports a weaker role for state powers?
(A) "Articles of Confederation"
(B) "Federalists"
(C) "Anti-Federalists"
(D) "The future of the nation"
"Anti-Federalists" section of the article introduces a point of view that supports a weaker role for state powers.
What was the main concern of Anti-Federalists?The primary worry of the anti-federalist movement was that the new United States Constitution would establish a centralised federal government with excessive power and authority, endangering the freedoms and rights of both individuals and the states. They believed that the Constitution did not go far enough in defending individual liberties and that a powerful federal government would eventually turn into a despotic and oppressive institution. They asserted that the Constitution gave the executive branch excessive power and that the lack of a Bill of Rights would expose citizens to abuses by the government. Anti-federalists aimed to curtail the federal government's authority and increase state autonomy and self-governance.
To Know more about "Anti-Federalists" Visit:
brainly.com/question/29496480
#SPJ1
What are the six general purposes stated in the Preamble to the Constitution? Which do you think is the most important? Why?
Answer:
The Preamble to the Constitution states the following six general purposes:
To form a more perfect Union
To establish Justice
To insure domestic Tranquility
To provide for the common defense
To promote the general Welfare
To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity
Each of these purposes is important in its own right, and they are all interrelated. However, if I had to choose the most important purpose, I would choose "To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity." This purpose recognizes that the Constitution is not just about establishing a government, but also about securing the rights and freedoms of the people. Without liberty, the other purposes of the Constitution are essentially meaningless. The Constitution is a living document that has been able to adapt to changing times in part because it was founded on the principle of securing the blessings of liberty for all. This purpose ensures that our rights and freedoms are protected, and that we are free to pursue our own happiness without interference from the government or others.
Explanation:
Need help with this I have to study
Answer:
Bolívar believed that South Americans were not ready for a republican form of government because they had been "harassed by a conduct" that had deprived them of their political rights and kept them in a state of "permanent infancy" with regard to public affairs. He also noted that Americans living within the Spanish system were no better than serfs destined for labor, which suggests that the social and economic conditions in South America were not conducive to the establishment of a republic. Despite his desire for perfection in the government of his country, Bolívar recognized that the New World was not yet ready to be organized as a great republic.
Hope this helps! If not, I'm sorry! If you need more help, ask me! :]
What was a lasting impact of African American art, literature, and music created during the Harlem Renaissance?
• It led to a resurgence of traditional American art forms and music.
• It inspired mainstream America to fully integrate Black culture and people.
• It created a platform for civil rights and changed the cultural landscape of the US.
It caused more languages to be spoken in the US and changed the political landscape.
✓ It created a platform for civil rights and changed the cultural landscape of the US.
How does a lawmaker's political affiliation impact his or her vote? Why does this occur?
Answer:
A lawmaker's political affiliation often influences their vote on legislative issues. This occurs because political parties represent different ideologies and interests, and lawmakers generally align with a particular party's platform and agenda. Lawmakers often share similar political beliefs and values with their party, which affects their stance on policy issues. Additionally, political parties have a significant influence on the legislative process, including committee assignments, bill sponsorship, and voting strategy. Party leadership also plays a role in shaping a lawmaker's vote by encouraging them to vote along party lines. Furthermore, party loyalty can affect a lawmaker's chances of re-election and their standing within their party. Overall, a lawmaker's political affiliation is a key factor in how they vote on legislative issues.
This occurs because political parties are formed around a set of shared values, beliefs, and policy positions. Lawmakers who belong to a particular party generally share these values and beliefs, and are expected to vote in line with the party's positions on policy issues. This is often reinforced by party leaders, who use a variety of tactics to ensure that party members vote as a bloc on key issues. Additionally, lawmakers may be subject to pressure from interest groups, constituents, and other stakeholders who are aligned with their party, further reinforcing the importance of voting along party lines. Ultimately, the expectation that lawmakers will vote in line with their party's positions on key issues is a key aspect of the American political system, and can be seen as a way of promoting political stability and consistency in government decision-making.
Hope this helps you! Sorry if it doesn't. :]
What is Locke’s rule of thumb for how much natural property one may moral accumulate?
"John Locke's rule of thumb for how much natural property one may morally accumulate is known as the "Lockean proviso". This proviso states that an individual can appropriate natural resources as long as there is "enough, and as good left in common for others". In other words, an individual can acquire property from nature as long as there is still enough of that resource available for others to use and enjoy. This ensures that the acquisition of property does not harm others and does not lead to a situation where some people have too much while others have too little. The Lockean proviso is often cited as an important principle in debates about property rights and resource management." (ChatGPT, 2023)
What made Naaman decide to talk to Elisha?
Select one:
a.
He was threatened by Israel’s king.
b.
He admired Elisha’s work.
c.
He wanted to travel to Israel.
d.
He felt like he had run out of other options.
Answer:
It's D! He felt like he had run out of other options.
Explanation:
In the story of Naaman in 2 Kings 5, Naaman is a powerful commander of the Aramean army who suffers from leprosy. Despite his power and wealth, he is unable to find a cure for his disease and becomes desperate. One of his servants suggests that he seek out the prophet Elisha in Israel, and Naaman eventually agrees to go. So, it was not because he was threatened by Israel's king, admired Elisha's work, or wanted to travel to Israel, but rather because he felt like he had run out of other options.
Hope this helps! Sorry if it's wrong. If you need more help, ask me! :]
What are the strict, loose, and actual decisions in McCullough v Maryland 1819 and Gibson v Ogden 1824? See pic.
Answer: read the explanation
Explanation:
Key points
* In the case McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court considered whether Congress had the power to create a national bank and whether the state of Maryland had interfered with congressional powers by taxing the national bank.
* The Supreme Court ruled in favor of McCulloch and found that the state of Maryland had interfered with one of Congress’s implied powers.
Background of the case
After the founding of the United States, one of the first things the new government had to address was the debt the nation had incurred fighting the Revolutionary War. Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton came up with a plan to create the Bank of the United States, a national bank, in order to absorb state debts from the war and to create a national currency. But not everyone agreed that the federal government had the power to create a bank.
One of the bank’s most vocal opponents was Thomas Jefferson, who argued that it was not within the federal government’s explicit powers to create a national bank and that doing so was an overreach of federal power. Despite opposition to the bank, Congress passed the first charter of the Bank of the United States in 1791, granting it the power to operate for twenty years.
But when it came time to renew the bank’s charter in 1811, the measure was defeated in Congress by one vote. It would take another five years for Congress to pass the second charter of the Bank of the United States, but in 1816, the national bank was re-established. Once again, conflict flared over whether Congress had the power to create a national bank.
The government of Maryland did not want a national bank and did not want a branch in Maryland. Nevertheless, the branch opened in 1817. The state of Maryland decided to tax the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States in an effort to run it out of business.
The bank’s cashier, James W. McCulloch, refused to pay the tax. In response, the state of Maryland sued him. Both the state trial court and the state supreme court agreed that McCulloch had to pay the tax. McCulloch appealed to the US Supreme Court, which heard the case in 1819. hope this helped
Need help ASAP
In this discussion, you will discuss whether you believe the Electoral College is an impediment to democracy. Over the course of this lesson, you learned what the Electoral College is, how it selects the President, delegates, winner-take-all elections, and instances where the Electoral College chose a winner who did not obtain the popular vote.
Based on what you learned today, you must answer this discussion prompt in at least three paragraphs: Does the Electoral College help or hurt democracy in the United States? If so, what changes should take place in our voting system? If not, what do critics have wrong about the Electoral College?
Trace the status of "No Man's Land" from the time that Indian tribes were sent there until statehood.
No Man's Land was first occupied by Native American tribes, after which it was declared public land, used by cowboys and cattle ranchers, and finally included in the state of Oklahoma.
No-man's-land is where in America?southwestern Oklahoma-
The Oklahoma Panhandle, historically known as No Man's Land, the Public Land Strip, the Neutral Strip, or Cimarron Territory, is a salient in the far northwest of the U.S. state of Oklahoma and is made up, from west to east, of the counties of Cimarron, Texas, and Beaver.
What the five tribes' leaders convened to discuss in Muskogee in 1905 and why they did so?Leaders of the Five Tribes met at the Sequoyah Convention in Muskogee in August 1905 to prepare a constitution and a memorial urging Congress to grant I.T. separate statehood after realizing that their governments would soon dissolve.
To know more about Tribes visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20058374
#SPJ1
Who encouraged FDR to make the
banks take a “holiday” when he
became President?
A. politicians
B. the Supreme Court
C. Einstein's interns
D. the Brain Trust
D. the Brain Trust encouraged FDR to make the banks take a "holiday" when he became President.
The Brain Trust was a group of academic advisors who helped FDR develop policies during his presidential campaign and after he took office. They consisted of economists, lawyers, and other experts who had a progressive outlook and believed in using government intervention to address social and economic problems. According to historian William Leuchtenburg, the Brain Trust "had formulated a plan for the President to cope with the banking crisis," which included the idea of a "bank holiday" to give the government time to reorganize and stabilize the banking system (Leuchtenburg, 1995, p. 141). FDR ultimately embraced this idea and declared a four-day bank holiday on March 6, 1933, which was followed by the Emergency Banking Act to restore confidence in the banking system.
Answer: D, The Brain Trust
Explanation:
HELPPP PLEASE PLEASE
Which phrase best explains the popularity of American music in China?
The diffusion of U.S culture
The result of U.S. free trade agreements
The communist control of government in China
The success of antitrust legislation in China
Option (A) is accurate; American music is well-liked in China as a result of the spread of American values and standards throughout the world via media, technology, and trade.
What kind of country is China?China, a socialist nation, bases its domestic policy on the needs of all its citizens. The best option for preserving the nation's interests and the welfare of its citizens is peaceful growth. A sizeable socialism nation from the East is China.
Why is it called a China?That is why throughout the history of ceramics, it progressively replaced pottery. Because it was first created in China, it is known as china in English, which completely explains how the fragile porcelain can serve as a symbol of China.
To know more about china visit :
https://brainly.com/question/1103101
#SPJ1
the era of sectionalism led to the____
Answer:
the civil war
Explanation:
The policies used by Peter the great in Russia were put in place to do what
Answer:reducing the influence of the boyars, or the feudal elite class.
Explanation:
He did this by imposing taxes and services on them as well as introducing comprehensive administrative reforms that opened civil service to commoners.
True or False: the Tribune of the Plebs was sacrosanct, meaning they were holy priests of the gods as well as public officers.
Supporters of capital punishment in nineteenth century America believed that abolishing capital punishment would "break up the foundations of society." How did Lydia Child answer this argument for the death sentence?
Lydia Maria Child was an American abolitionist, women's rights activist, and author who spoke out against the capital punishment.
What is capital punishment?Capital punishment, also known as death penalty, is legal process where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for crime they have committed. This sentence is usually reserved for the most serious crimes, such as murder, treason, or espionage. The methods used for carrying out capital punishment vary by country and can include methods such as lethal injection, electrocution, gas chambers, hanging, or firing squad. Supporters of capital punishment argue that it is a necessary deterrent for serious crimes, while opponents argue that it is morally wrong and can result in the execution of innocent people. The use of capital punishment is a highly debated topic around the world, with some countries having abolished it, while others continue to use it.
To learn more about treason, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11441798
#SPJ9
Please answer the question in the picture
Enlightenment Idea: Natural Rights
American Revolution: The idea of natural rights, such as life, liberty, and property, influenced the American Revolution and is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence.French Revolution: The idea of natural rights also influenced the French Revolution and was reflected in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.What was the French Revolution?Enlightenment Idea: The Social Contract
American Revolution: The idea of the social contract, where people agree to be governed in exchange for protection of their rights, influenced the American Revolution and is reflected in the Constitution.French Revolution: The idea of the social contract also influenced the French Revolution and was reflected in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.Enlightenment Idea: Balance of Power
American Revolution: The idea of balance of power, where no one branch of government has too much power, influenced the American Revolution and is reflected in the Constitution.French Revolution: The idea of balance of power was not as influential in the French Revolution and did not result in a stable government.Lastly, Enlightenment Idea: Separation of Church & State
American Revolution: The idea of the separation of church and state influenced the American Revolution and is reflected in the First Amendment to the Constitution.French Revolution: The idea of the separation of church and state also influenced the French Revolution and resulted in the de-Christianization campaign.Read more about French Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/1046744
#SPJ1
See text below
ENLIGHTENMENT LEADS TO REVOLUTION
Directions: The ideas that grew out of the Enlightenment had a direct influence on both the American and French Revolutions. In the table below explain how each idea affected each revolution.
Enlightenment Idea
Natural Rights
The Social Contract
Balance of Power Separation of Church
& State
AMERICAN
REVOLUTION
French
Revolution
according to adam smith how do specialization and the division of labor lead to market exchange
The division of labor is constrained by the size of the market, according to a famous statement made by Adam Smith in The Accumulation of Nations.This is so that each people can specialize in their line of work while still having a choice of a broad range of products and services.
What role does Adam Smith give the division of labor in society?Yet, Adam Smith's explanation of the labor distribution as a mechanism for generating wealth and market systems that use self-interest as just a fuel for that mechanism were combined in his book The Wealth of Nations.He claimed that growing division of labor was the fundamental driver of wealth.
What is Adam Smith's position on market exchange?He argued that since he believed that distance and natural barriers were the only constraints on market trading, governmental policy should not erect further man-made barriers to it.As a result, he generally supported his position that governments should support "free trade."
To know more about products and services visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13499657
#SPJ1
what are gore's and bush's positions on full public financing of federal elections
Gore's and bush's positions on full public financing of federal elections is that Bush has expressed support for some aspects of campaign finance reform while Gore has argued that the influence of money in politics undermines democracy .
What was their take on the finance issues?George W. Bush, who served as President of the United States from 2001 to 2009 and was the Republican Party nominee for President in 2000, has been less supportive of full public financing of federal elections. While Bush gives support for some aspects of campaign finance reform, he has also argued that restrictions on campaign spending can limit free speech and that public financing could discourage private donations and reduce the influence of political parties.
It is worth noting, however, that both Gore and Bush were running for President in 2000 and their positions may have evolved or changed since then. Additionally, campaign finance reform is a complex issue with many different proposals and potential approaches, so their positions may vary depending on the specific details of any given proposal.
Learn more about elections at:
https://brainly.com/question/25815264
#SPJ1