On May 16, 1916, the United Kingdom and France signed the Sykes-Picot Agreement, which also had the approval of Russia. After World War I, the agreement attempted to partition the Middle Eastern provinces of the Ottoman Empire.
Spheres of influence were established by the pact, which gave France and Britain power over parts of the Levant, and the Arabian Peninsula. The pact largely ignored the region's pre-existing racial, religious, and political divides in favor of the European powers' strategic objectives.
As it virtually signaled the end of the Ottoman Empire, the Sykes-Picot Agreement greatly affected it. Although the Ottoman Empire was already in decline, the pact signaled the start of its fall. The Ottoman authority struggled to withstand the demands of the European powers due to the war and internal dissent, and the empire was progressively torn apart.
Many Arabs felt betrayed by the European powers who had promised them independence in exchange for their support during the war, and this betrayal contributed to the birth of Arab nationalism. Many of the crises and periods of instability that still afflict the Middle East today have their roots in the division of the region.
learn more about Ottoman Empire here
https://brainly.com/question/788257
#SPJ1
what was the result of the war of 1812?
The War of 1812 was a war between the United States and Great Britain, which lasted from 1812 to 1815. Despite some early American successes, such as victory at the Battle of Lake Erie, the war was generally inconclusive and ended in a draw. In 1814, both sides agreed to a peace treaty called the Treaty of Ghent, which restored relations between the two countries to the way they were before the war. One of the long-term effects of the war was that it strengthened the feeling of national unity in the United States and led to further territorial expansion in the West.
How the Integration of whites and Blacks has helped to perpetuate inequality and racism in South Africa
The integration of whites and blacks in South Africa has not necessarily led to elimination of inequality and racism, but rather has sometimes perpetuated it.
What is inequality?Inequality refers to the unequal distribution of resources, opportunities, and power among individuals or groups within a society. It can manifest in different forms such as income and wealth inequality, gender and racial discrimination, unequal access to education, healthcare, and social services. Inequality can have negative impacts on individuals' well-being and can lead to social unrest and instability. In addition, it can limit economic growth and hinder the development of a society as a whole. Addressing inequality requires policies and actions that aim to promote fairness, justice, and equal opportunities for all individuals regardless of their background or social status.
To learn more about inequality, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5947672
#SPJ9
Complete Question:
How has the Integration of whites and Blacks helped to perpetuate inequality and racism in South Africa?
Read the excerpt from the Edicts of Ashoka.
They (my officers) work among soldiers, chiefs,
householders, the poor, the aged- for their welfare
and happiness-so that they may be free from
harassment. The officers work for the proper
treatment of prisoners, towards their unfettering, and if
the officers think, "This one has a family to support,"
"That one has been bewitched," "This one is old,"
then they work for the release of such prisoners. They
work here, in outlying towns, in the women's quarters
belonging to my brothers and sisters, and among my
other relatives. They are occupied everywhere.
What is the main idea of the edict?
O Women, the elderly, and prisoners should be given
special treatment.
Ashoka's officers have the power to make
decisions on their own.
O Ashoka's officers are watching what people are
doing all the time.
O Ashoka's officers would treat all citizens with
respect regardless of status.
Option (d), No of their position, Ashoka's officers would treat them with dignity.
Whom did Ashoka appoint as special agents charged with promoting and upholding the Dhamma across his empire?Ashoka appointed specialized officers known as dhammamahamatras to defend and advance Buddhism across the realm. He had the precepts of the dhamma etched onto rocks, pillars, and cave walls in Prakrit so that the common people can read and apply them.
What rules did Ashoka give his officials to follow?Ashoka also had his messages engraved on pillars and rocks, and he instructed his officials to read them to anybody who was unable to do it on their own. Ashoka also sent emissaries to Syria, Egypt, Greece, and Sri Lanka in order to spread the dhamma to these nations.
Learn more about Ashoka: https://brainly.com/question/13619538
#SPJ1
Why did the Cold War accelerate the end of Jim Crow?
Sequencing Copy the organizer
below. Use it to place into sequence
the important events in the record
of British imperialism in North and
East Africa
Organizer: race towards Africa, Berlin Meeting, British rule over Egypt, Omdurman Battle of the Mahdist War, British rule over Sudan, Kenya was colonised by the British, 'Mau Mau' movements for independence in uprising
Use it to place into sequence the important events in the record of British imperialism in North and East AfricaIn the late 19th century, the Scramble for Africa—a period of intense colonisation and exploitation of Africa by European powers—began. The Berlin Conference, which included Britain, was held in 1884 to divide Africa among the European powers. Following its 1882 takeover of Egypt, Britain waged the Mahdist War against rebels in Sudan from 1884 to 1899, which culminated in the Battle of Omdurman. Up until the country's independence in 1956, the Sudan remained under British rule. Because of political unrest and economic inequality, many African nations are still suffering from the effects of British imperialism in North and East Africa.
To Know more about Battle of the Mahdist Visit:
brainly.com/question/10029355
#SPJ1
What role did the United States play in the Mexican Revolution?
Answer:
The U.S. played a huge role in the evolution of the Mexican Revolution. It supported the anti-reelectionist movement, agreed with Bernardo Reyes and Félix Díaz's revolt against Francisco I. Madero, helped the revolutionaries defeat Huerta, and invaded Veracruz in 1914.
Explanation:
Answer the following in at least 5-8 complete sentences.
In your own words, provide a definition for the term imperialism that addresses the four different arguments about the causes and values of imperialism (as mentioned in the article).
First argument: Does Imperialism pay?
Second argument: Imperialism is the nature of human beings.
Third argument: Strategy and security of the region.
Fourth argument: Moral grounds- the spread of religion.
Part 2 - Opinion Writing:
Based on what you have learned in this unit, as well as from the article, write an introductory paragraph to an essay expressing your opinion on the issue of imperialism. Overall, is imperialism a positive or negative condition and/or policy, and what are some examples to support your position?
Answer:
L'impérialisme peut être défini comme une politique d'expansion territoriale et d'influence politique et économique sur d'autres nations et peuples. Cette politique a été motivée par différents arguments, notamment économiques, humains, stratégiques et moraux. Certains ont justifié l'impérialisme en affirmant qu'il était rentable, que la domination était la nature humaine, que cela garantissait la sécurité régionale ou que c'était une façon de propager une religion. Cependant, d'autres ont critiqué cette politique en affirmant que c'était une forme de domination et d'exploitation qui nuisait aux peuples soumis. Ils ont également souligné les effets négatifs sur la culture et la société des nations dominées. En fin de compte, l'impérialisme peut être considéré comme une politique et une condition à la fois positives et négatives, en fonction des motivations, des méthodes et des conséquences. Dans cet essai, je vais soutenir que l'impérialisme est généralement une politique négative en raison des conséquences néfastes pour les peuples dominés, mais que dans certains cas, il peut être considéré comme positif, par exemple lorsque les peuples dominés bénéficient d'une modernisation bénéfique, d'une meilleure gouvernance et de protections accrues contre les conflits. Pour illustrer mon point de vue, je vais examiner plusieurs exemples d'impérialisme dans l'histoire, tels que le colonialisme européen en Afrique, l'impérialisme japonais en Asie et l'expansion américaine dans les Caraïbes et en Amérique latine.
Explanation:
What was president Lincoln’s central goal during the civil war
Answer:
President Lincoln's central goal was to preserve the Union.
Explanation: Hope it helps you :))))
Why is Morley important to the narrator's understanding of herself? Use two details story to support your response.
What do you think might result from the
growing sectionalism in Congress?
Northern congressmen voted against proslavery measure such as the Fugitive slave act and South were against abolition of slave trade in Washington.
6 Clever | Log in
Prodigy Education
Fill in the blanks to tell what Blare
did to help the children of Haiti.
The plan was for Blare to deliver more than just his one unique bear to Haiti. He intended to appeal to his neighborhood to gather several bears. He wanted to amass 2,000 bears. Many children in Haiti would be inspired by that.
Blare Gooch: Who is he?Blare Gooch, a 13-year-old from Grand Rapids with connections to Bronson, was chosen by Parenting magazine as one of the "Kids of the Year" for his "Blare's Bears for Haiti" campaign.
Does Haiti pose a threat?Avoid traveling to Haiti due to kidnapping, bloodshed, and unrest there. Americans need to leave Haiti immediately due to the current security, medical, and infrastructure problems. United States citizens who want to leave Port-au-Prince should follow local news reports and only depart when it is judged safe to do so.
Learn more about infrastructure problems: https://brainly.com/question/3808148
#SPJ1
The city state of Venice should only be governed by merchants who understand buisness and not by catholic clergy who only understand the Bible ?
Answer:
It is worth noting that the governance of the city state of Venice during its history was complex and involved various groups, including merchants and the Catholic Church. The role and influence of different groups in Venice's government varied over time, and different individuals and factions had different perspectives on what was best for the city and its people. Ultimately, the effectiveness and legitimacy of a government depend on many factors, including the competence and integrity of its leaders, the quality of its institutions, and the support and participation of its citizens.
The most highly populated region in Canada is: the Cordilleran region the St. Lawrence Lowlands region the Interior Plains region the Pacific region
The St. Lawrence Lowlands, home to major cities like Montreal, Quebec City, and Toronto, is Canada's most populous region.
Is the St. Lawrence Lowlands the region with the most people?
The ecozone reaches Quebec City along the St. Lawrence shoreline. The "most populous and prosperous terrestrial ecozone" is represented by it. and its two major cities, Toronto, Ontario, and Montreal, Quebec, are home to roughly half of Canada's population.
Choose the Lowlands area as the most populous region in Canada.
One of Canada's most rich, inhabited, and productive regions is the St. Lawrence Lowlands.
To know more about Toronto visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/6391311
#SPJ1
What was the purpose of the Berlin Wall?
A. Prevent West Berliners from invading East Berlin
B. Prevent West Berliners from leaving
C. Physically divide Northern Berlin from Southern Berlin
D. Prevent East Germans from leaving
The purpose of the Berlin Wall was:
D. Prevent East Germans from leaving3.) What spurred the growth
of Virginia?
a) tobacco
b) coal mining
c) new farmland for
farmers
d) new urban areas were
developing
Which of the following was NOT a decision made at the Yalta Conference?
A. Soviets did not have to allow free elections in occupied cities
B. The Soviets would join the war against Japan
C. Germany would be divided into four parts
D. Germans were to pay reparations for the war
Answer:
a
Explanation:
In their quest to have direct trade with Europeans on the coast, Akyem and Akwamu often clashed. Akwamu Kingdom was successful in materializing this ambition by her conquest of Accra in 1677. However, by 1730, Akyem had conquered Akwamu kingdom to possess not only Akwamu itself but its large provinces like Accra and Ladoku.
Based on the above,
1. Discuss the initial challenges that Akyem faced with regards to raising people to administer those large territories.
2. What is the history behind the inability of Akyem to raise people to rule those territories?
3. What temporal solution did Akyem offer to solve the situation?
The Eastern Region of Ghana is home to the Akyem kingdom and ethnic group. The Akyem people have contributed significantly to Ghana's development and have a rich history and culture.
The size of the Akyem state, which made it challenging to retain centralised authority over the populace, was one of the largest challenges. Lack of a formal educational system in the Akyem presented another difficulty because it limited the chances for young people to acquire the knowledge and abilities necessary to work as competent administrators.
The Akyem are a member of the wider Akan ethnic group, one of Ghana's main ethnic groupings, and are found in the West African nation of Ghana.
To know more about Akyem people, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31487383
#SPJ1
Can someone please give me 1 paragraph
It is difficult to predict whether we will ever see a political compromise similar to the Compromise of 1877 in the United States. The Compromise of 1877 was a political agreement between Republicans and Democrats that resolved the disputed 1876 presidential election, with Republicans agreeing to withdraw federal troops from the South in exchange for Democrats' acceptance of Rutherford B. Hayes as president. While there have been hotly contested elections in recent years, it is uncertain whether the political climate and circumstances would allow for such a compromise in today's political landscape.
While compromise can be an effective and necessary tool for resolving political disputes, it is important to consider the potential consequences of any agreement. The Compromise of 1877, while resolving the disputed election, also effectively ended Reconstruction in the South and led to the disenfranchisement of African American voters for decades. Any political compromise should be evaluated carefully to ensure that it does not undermine the principles of democracy or the rights of any individuals or groups. Ultimately, the goal of any election and political process should be to ensure a fair and transparent outcome that reflects the will of the people.
.Due to the difficulties of passing immigration reform through a Republican-controlled Congress, President Obama chose to issue the executive order "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)" as a means of protecting the immigrant children who have grown up in the United States After repeated efforts to get additional funding for a new wall along the U.S.-Mexico border from the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives failed, President Trump finally issued the executive order: "Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements" as a means of using existing federal funds to begin building the wall. What do both of these scenarios demonstrate about why presidents use executive orders?
Answer:
President Obama proposed improving legal immigration processes, strengthening border security, deporting people convicted of a felony, expanding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, and creating the Deferred Action for Parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program. DACA and DAPA were the most controversial elements of the president's plan with Republican critics, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Sen. Mike Lee (Utah), saying that the programs were a form of amnesty.[8] President Obama responded to these criticisms, saying, "I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not. Amnesty is the immigration system we have today – millions of people who live here without paying their taxes or playing by the rules, while politicians use the issue to scare people and whip up votes at election time."[7]
Texas and the 25 states that brought a lawsuit against the Obama administration argued that President Obama did not have the authority to implement DAPA because it was essentially a new law. The brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Texas and the states argued that "DAPA is a crucial change in the Nation’s immigration law and policy—and that is precisely why it could be created only by Congress, rather than unilaterally imposed by the Executive.
The Obama administration argued that the president's actions were legal because Congress had given the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the ability to administer and enforce immigration laws under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The DHS secretary had the authority to decide whom to deport and whom to grant deferred action to under the INA, and "Congress has repeatedly recognized" this ability in other legislation. The United States government argued that the ruling of the appeals court, which stated that DAPA could not be implemented, "will allow States to frustrate the federal government’s enforcement of the Nation’s immigration laws. It will force millions of people—who are not removal priorities under criteria the court conceded are valid, and who are parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents—to continue to work off the books, without the option of lawful employment to provide for their families.
Which of the following is a country NOT annexed by the Soviet Union shortly after Germany’s declaration of war?
A. Eastern Poland
B. Sweden
C. Finland
D. Lithuania
Sweden is a country not annexed by the Soviet Union shortly after Germany’s declaration of war.
What is Soviet Union?The Soviet Union was a single-party Marxist-Leninist state that existed from 1922 to 1991. It was governed by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and its capital and largest city was Moscow. It was a union of 15 Soviet Socialist Republics, and its economic and political system was based on the Soviet model of central planning and state ownership of resources. The Soviet Union was a superpower that played a major role in world politics, including the Cold War. It was one of the two superpowers and the world's largest and most powerful nation until its dissolution in 1991. The Soviet Union was characterized by its centrally planned economy, its commitment to the ideology of state socialism and its reliance on the state to provide social services and welfare.
To learn more about Soviet Union
https://brainly.com/question/1310325
#SPJ1
_______ Important factors in the wealth of a country, includes minerals and timber?
Answer:
Natural resources like minerals and timber can play a significant role in a nation's wealth. Countries that have plentiful natural resources can often benefit from the sale and export of those resources, which can contribute to economic growth and improve their overall wealth. However, it's also critical to keep in mind that relying excessively on the export of natural resources can cause instability and volatility in the economy, particularly if those prices fluctuate dramatically on a worldwide scale.
Which statement is true about the Native American population in the United States?
A)It declined in the late 1800s due to mass migration to other countries.
B)Native Americans share a common culture and language.
C)Some groups are currently developing mineral resources on their land.
D)Native Americans came to the United States to help build railroads.
The Venetians and Ottomans were trade partners because?
Answer:
a mutually beneficial relationship providing each with access to key ports and valuable goods
Explanation:
i hope this helps :)
How did the North and the South differ economically during the Civil War?
A: The North had more people than the South, so it could produce more goods.
B: The South had more immigrants the North, so it had a more diverse economy.
C: The South had better technology than the North, so it made better weapons.
D: The North had more enslaved people than the South, so it could produce goods more cheaply.
Answer:
none of the above
Explanation:
E: The North had a more diversified economy based on manufacturing and industry, while the South was largely dependent on agriculture and the labor of enslaved people.
Before the Civil War, the North had a strong industrial base and was rapidly expanding its infrastructure, including railroads and factories. This allowed it to manufacture and produce goods at a faster rate than the agrarian South. The North's economy was also more diversified, with a variety of industries and businesses contributing to its economic growth.
In contrast, the South was heavily reliant on agriculture, particularly cotton, which was grown on large plantations using the labor of enslaved people. The South did not have the same level of industrialization as the North and was therefore not able to produce goods at the same rate. Additionally, the South's economy was largely dependent on exports, particularly cotton exports to European markets.
These economic differences played a significant role in the outcome of the Civil War, as the North's industrial strength and diversified economy allowed it to better support and sustain its war effort, while the South's reliance on agriculture and enslaved labor made it more vulnerable to economic disruption and collapse.
The North and the South differ economically during the Civil War because the North had more enslaved people than the South, so it could produce goods more cheaply. The correct option is D.
How was the North affected economically after the Civil War ended?Following the Civil War's end, the North's economy grew significantly. With compensation in hand, returning soldiers were able to build sizable new customer bases for a range of various businesses.
With a focus on commerce and manufacturing, the economy in the North was more industrialized. On the other hand, the South's agricultural economy was highly dependent on the labor of slaves. In contrast to the North, which produced more food crops, the South exported cash commodities like cotton. The North also possessed a more advanced transportation network, with more railroads and canals, which facilitated the movement of both commodities and people.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about North America here:
https://brainly.com/question/19339803
#SPJ2
Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal programs gave the government a more active role in
deregulating businesses.
deregulating “brain trusts.”
creating a laissez-faire economy.
creating jobs.
The New Deal initiatives of Franklin Roosevelt gave the government a more active role in job creation. The answer is option (d).
What is New Deal according to Franklin Roosevelt?Several ambitious work plans, laws, and monetary reforms known as the "New Deal" were put forth by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936, during the height of the Great Depression. Only in opposition to the "Great Depression" were these measures implemented. The arrangement placed a strong emphasis on protecting the banking system in order to strengthen the economy and help the country's manufacturing sector.
Following its approval by the Congress and the President's implementation during the Roosevelt Presidency, it was put into effect. One of Roosevelt's most well-known and lauded accomplishments was his ability to improve the country's economic situation during the Great Depression.
To know more about Franklin Roosevelt, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1481586
#SPJ1
Answer:
creating jobs
Explanation:
how were the victims of Racims in both germany in south Africa
Answer:
Racism had a significant impact on both Germany and South Africa in the past, but the nature and scope of racism differed in both countries.
In Germany, during the Nazi regime led by Adolf Hitler, millions of Jews, Romas, homosexuals, disabled people, and others were targeted and systematically murdered in what became known as the Holocaust. This was a result of Nazi ideology that deemed certain groups of people as inferior and unworthy of life. The Holocaust is considered one of the most significant tragedies in human history and serves as a reminder of the devastating consequences of racism, discrimination, and prejudice.
In South Africa, apartheid was a system of institutionalized racial segregation that was implemented by the white minority government in the mid-20th century. It resulted in widespread discrimination, inequality, and human rights abuses against non-white South Africans, particularly Black people. Non-white people were denied many basic rights, such as access to education, housing, and employment. The apartheid system was ultimately dismantled in the early 1990s, following years of protests, sanctions, and international pressure.
Both Germany and South Africa have since made efforts to acknowledge and address their respective histories of racism, including through education, remembrance, and policies aimed at promoting equality and combating discrimination.
Can someone help me to answer these questions please
Listen to Kerry Washington perform Sojourner Truth's speech Ain't I a Woman. Then go to ST's version at the Sojourner Truth Project's website. Compare the differences between Frances Gage's (the one Washington read) and Marius Robinson's earlier version (the one ST read). You can read them here.
Answer the following questions:
1. List 3 differences between the Robinson version and the Gage version of the speech.
2. Why do you think it is important to hear both versions of the speech?
3. How do you think the differences changed the way people (in the north and the south) understood the context of her speech? How about now?
4. How does hearing the differences in dialect change the way you think about the speech?
answer them in at least 10 sentences.
When women’s rights activists spoke out, who were they advocating for, white women or African-American women?
What are the distinct arguments that Truth makes in her speech?
What is Truth saying about women’s rights?
Who is going to give them these rights?
How does Truth’s speech reflect intersectionality?
What passages in the speech reflect this?
What is the current balance between the government protecting the public from terrorist threats while also protecting people’s individual rights
the current balance is atleast high levels of the terrorist threats in the US and all around the world while also protecting the individual rights of the people 60% of it is on the individual rights and the 40% is on the terrorist threats
Examine two or more significant conflicts in the struggle for independence from Britain. Describe the successes and failures of each side, and provide a perspective that explains how the manner in which these wars were fought reveals something about the distinctions between the colonists and the British.
Although the colonists suffered a heavy defeat at Bunker Hill, it also demonstrated to the British that they were prepared to fight and were capable of holding their own. Although they were able to take the hill, the British incurred significant losses in the process, which had a negative impact on their spirits.
Due to a substantial colonial victory, the Battle of Saratoga marked a turning point in the Revolutionary War. The colonists' morale was raised as a result of the British being forced to surrender, and they also received crucial French backing.
The tactics used in these battles provide insight into the differences between the colonists and the British. While the British liked to battle in broad fields in traditional formation, the colonists depended on guerilla tactics like hiding behind buildings and trees and firing at the British from cover.
This demonstrates the colonists' ability to adapt and employ novel tactics in conflict as well as their capacity to make use of their familiarity with the environment. The British, on the other hand, were less willing to adjust to the shifting conditions and were more dogmatic in their approach to battle.
learn more about independence from Britain here
https://brainly.com/question/1410857
#SPJ1
how did Microsoft innovate and improve GUIs?
GUIs in history
Microsoft further developed GUIs through doing the accompanying: Causing it to have more visual attachment ,Making it more instinctive and Making it more clear.
What is Microsoft's advancement procedure?In a holistic manner, the innovation strategy ought to address processes, culture, and enabling technology. The purpose of Microsoft's Innovation Management Framework is to assist businesses in developing a comprehensive and integrated strategy for supporting and implementing an innovation management strategy.
On April 4, 1975, Bill and Paul Allen established Microsoft to develop and market Essential mediators for the Altair 8800. With MS-DOS, it became the dominant PC operating system in the 1980s, followed by Windows.
What is the GUI?Using visual indicator representations, graphic user interfaces allow users to interact with electronic devices.
To learn more about Microsoft visit :
https://brainly.com/question/27308429
#SPJ1