Answer:
The trial of Peter Zenger showed that the jury needs to be more diverse. The jury on his first trial were all in general his enemies(the king's council). That's not fair since they would be on the king's side and the judge makes decisions with the help of the jury and the evidence they present. This would mean an unanimous belief that he should be in jail. His second trial were full of Zenger's peers. Which may not be fair but was a victory for Zenger(with the help of famous lawyer Hamilton)
The famous case of Peter Zenger happened in 1733. He was accused of calumny. Earlier it was illegal for any individual to write and promote any opinion or information against the government.
This hearing showed that the judicial policy needed to reform and the judging panel should be more diverse.
The tribunal in Zenger's trial was all King's members that clearly would not have supported or defended him.The panel members were surely on the leader's side and the court could not reach a balanced judgment as they would be biased towards the predicament.In his next trial, the jury was filled with Zenger's supporters and hence the verdict came in his favour.Therefore, this case shows that impartial bar arrangement should be abolished.
To learn more about Peter Zenger's trial follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/8296772
PLZZ ANSWER THE QUESTION
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The colonist hated it when the British government forced them to house soldiers in their own homes at their own cost. While all of the causes listed did actually happen only C shows the correct effect. Americans remembered how they felt about what happened and wanted to ensure that could never happen again.
What impacted transcendentalism for Henry David Thoreau
"What impacted transcendentalism for Henry David Thoreau"
The transcendentalists were heavily influenced by the European Romantic movement and Eastern religious texts and rituals. They also firmly believed in the power of intuition over logic, and were fierce advocates of independence and self-sufficiency.
Help ASAP!’
What evidence can be offered to support this statement: Although it is not legal obligation, voting is the most important duty a citizen can carry out?
Answer: Voting is the most important duty because as seen time and time again in history, your president/leader matters. If you don't vote, you might not be able to help the best candidate win. You could end up having a tyrant in a position of power. A piece of evidence that supports this is how King George III acted. They were a tyrant that taxed the colonists in American heavily and denied any attempts to amend the situation. We're lucky to be able to vote now so why would you waste that opportunity? Voting is one of the most vital duties you have.
Voting is the most significant obligation because, as history has repeatedly demonstrated, your president or leader matters.
Why is Voting Important ?You might not be able to support the best candidate's victory if you don't cast a ballot. A tyrant could find up in a position of authority. King George III's behavior is one piece of evidence in favor of this. They were a dictator who levied high taxes on the colonies in America and rejected any attempts to make things better.
One of your most important responsibilities is to vote.
Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives are chosen directly by the people in accordance with Article 1 of the Constitution.
However, the Electoral College would choose the president instead of the general public. The number of representative votes allotted by the Electoral College is normally determined by the population of each state. The use of state representatives in Congress to elect a president was considered as a compromise between the public vote and this indirect election process.
Learn more about Voting here
https://brainly.com/question/21093353
# SPJ 5
How did the British treat the Native Americans they came into contact with when they began colonizing North America?
THE NATIVE AMERICANS WELCOMED THEM , AND GAVE THEM SHULTER AND FOOD AND TREATED THEM EQUALLY
The natives let the colonists stay only if both gave something in return the for example, the natives they wanted guns but colonists did not allow that another thing colonists wanted gold in return but the natives wanted the guns in return too.
Why did Spain allow U.S. immigration into their territory?
Helppppp
Answer:
The reasons for the early Spanish Immigration to America was the desire to expand the Spanish Empire and the prestige of Spain, the conversion of 'savages' to the Catholic faith, exploitation of the natural resources of the New World, especially gold, silver and spices and new opportunities for trade.
Explanation: