The Women's March on Versailles was a pivotal moment in the French Revolution. It instilled confidence in the revolutionaries in the power of the people over the king.
A big gathering of women in a Paris marketplace revolted on the morning of October 5, 1789. They needed bread for their family. They began marching across Paris, demanding fair prices for bread. As the march progressed, more people joined the group, and there were soon thousands of marchers.
The crowd first took over the Hotel de Ville in Paris (similar to a city hall), where they obtained bread as well as firearms. Revolutionaries in the crowd proposed going to Versailles and confronting King Louis XVI. They referred to the king as "Baker," and the queen as "Baker's wife."
To learn more about Versailles, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29672303
#SPJ4
What did the geography of all the first known civilizations have in common?
Located near a good source of water
Contains good soil for growing crops
Located in a mild, bearable climate
All of the Above
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
how effective do you think French tactic of pacification was in winning support in French Indochina ?
French tactic of pacification was in winning support in French Indochina was very effective as it put an end to dissension.
Was the pacification strategy effective?
Few people are aware that our side, the South Vietnamese, who received significant support from the US, actually prevailed in the counterinsurgency conflict in Vietnam. The counterinsurgency strategy known as "pacification," as it was called back then, was successful.
What was the French's aim with pacification?
In addition to restoring order by putting an end to dissent via all reasonable means, backed by political accommodation and a wide range of repressive measures tailored to the circumstances of the terrain and population, the goal was to restore calm over a region torn by civil war.
Know more about pacification- brainly.com/question/23744887
#SPJ1
What might a leader be like who followed the advice of Ashoka and "exerted himself" in doing good deeds? What might a leader be like who followed the Upanishads passage, avoiding pleasure and gaining understanding?
Answer:
The first lesson learned from Ashoka's story is the power of self-introspection to change one's self from bad to good and from good to better. Ashoka never would have considered changing his nature if he hadn't thought back on his previous actions.
Explanation:
Through his inscriptions, Asoka communicated his message of love, peace, and compassion. He despatched envoys to different places to propagate his word and appointed dhamma mahamattas, or ministers, to do so. He adhered to the ahimsa (non-violence) philosophy. He forbade the needless killing of animals.
The Upanishads depict an interconnected universe with a single, overarching principle that underlies the seeming diversity of the cosmos and is known as Brahman in any expression. The Upanishads assert that Brahman exists in the Atman, the constant centre of the human being, in this situation.
to learn more about Ashoka, click here:
https://brainly.in/question/37665443
#SPJ4
what was the name of the racial system used in south africa?
The name of the racial system used in South Africa was Apartheid. It was a law enshrined in the constitution of the country.
Apartheid, which in Afrikaans means "Apartness" was a legal framework that supported segregation against non-white South African inhabitants. The majority of South Africans who are not white were required to live away from white people and use separate public facilities throughout the country's apartheid era. There was little interaction between the two groups.
Apartheid was opposed strongly and consistently both inside and outside of South Africa, but its laws persisted for more than 50 years.The apartheid system was finally put an end to in 1994 when a coalition government with a majority of non-white people was formed as a result of elections following a protracted period of resistance headed by Nelson Mandela.
Learn more about Apartheid here:
https://brainly.com/question/413554
explain how at least three reform movements responded to the rise of industrial capitalism in the gilded age
By promoting laws, workers' rights, and social welfare, three reform movements of the Gilded Age—Progressivism, Populism, and Labor—tried to counteract the damaging effects of industrial capitalism on society.
A number of reform movements were born during the Gilded Age in reaction to the unfavourable impacts of industrial capitalism. The Progressive Movement, which attempted to address social and political ills such governmental corruption, poverty, and economic injustice, was the first movement. The Labor Movement, which aimed to raise manufacturing employees' pay and working conditions, was the second movement. The Temperance Movement, the third movement, sought to lessen alcohol use and the societal issues it was linked to. All of these movements sought to make working-class Americans' lives better and to build a society that is just and equal. Through political action, lobbying, and grassroots organisation, they sought to effect change.
learn more about reform movements here:
https://brainly.com/question/29913898
#SPJ4
Question 13
Some of the decisions the delegates needed to make were about...
choose 2
How to tax people
How to structure the government
How to elect the next president
How would the people be represented?
Help please
The Congress, a joint resolution approved by a two-thirds majority, or a convention called by the Congress in response to requests from the state legislatures' two-thirds can all propose amendments.
What two important concepts did all state delegates appear to agree upon?A distinct executive that is independent of the legislature was largely agreed upon by the delegates. President would be the title given to the executive. Additionally, they decided to grant the president the ability to veto bills, but only if this could be done.Two methods are available to suggest revisions to the Constitution under Article V. The Congress, a joint resolution approved by a two-thirds majority, or a convention called by the Congress in response to requests from the state legislatures' two-thirds can all propose amendments.The Congress, a joint resolution approved by a two-thirds majority, or a convention called by the Congress in response to requests from the state legislatures' two-thirds can all propose amendments.To learn more about amendments refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ1
what templar is this
Answer:
The order of Santiago
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Answer: This Templar is the Templar of Santiago
Explanation:
What are two ways the government protects us from harmful products and work conditions 
Answer: Government protects us from harmful products and work conditions by implementing 8 federal laws.
1. providing minimum wages
2. workplace safety
3. health coverage
4. social security
5. unemployment benefits
6. family leave
7. whistelblower protection
8.employment based discrimination
Explanation:
Napoleon argumentative essay
Answer:
Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the most debated figures in history, with scholars and experts offering contrasting perspectives on his role in the French Revolution, his military campaigns and his impact on Europe. While some argue that Napoleon was a military genius who brought stability and prosperity to France, others claim that he was a dictator who betrayed the ideals of the Revolution and plunged Europe into war.
One of the key arguments in favor of Napoleon is that he brought stability and prosperity to France after the chaos of the French Revolution. He established a strong central government and professional army, which helped to bring order to the country and defend it against foreign invaders. He also implemented a series of important reforms such as the Napoleonic Code, which provided a legal framework for the modernisation of French society and abolished feudal privileges. This brought a significant improvement to the lives of ordinary French citizens, which contributed to his popularity.
Another argument in favor of Napoleon is that he expanded the territory and influence of France through his military conquests. He defeated powerful European countries such as Austria, Prussia, and Spain, and established a large empire that stretched from Spain to Poland. He also spread the ideals of the Revolution, such as nationalism and liberal, throughout Europe. This expansion allowed France to become a dominant power in Europe and helped to bring an end to the centuries-long balance of power.
On the other hand, one argument against Napoleon is that he betrayed the ideals of the French Revolution by becoming a dictator and crushing political dissent. He established a secret police force and suppressed the press, and he eliminated the democratic institutions that had been established during the Revolution. He also imposed a new system of conscription that forced men to fight in his wars, which led to the deaths of many French citizens. This behaviour contradicts the principles of democracy and liberty that the revolution aimed to achieve, making Napoleon's leadership a dictatorship, rather than a representation of the people.
Another argument against Napoleon is that he was responsible for the deaths of thousands of people through his wars and military campaigns. He embarked on a series of aggressive wars that destabilized Europe and caused widespread suffering and death. He also imposed harsh conditions on the countries he conquered, which led to widespread poverty and suffering. This led to a significant loss of life and human suffering, which can't be overlooked or justified by any military victories or territorial gains.
In conclusion, Napoleon Bonaparte is a complex and controversial figure in history. While he brought stability and prosperity to France, expanded its territory and influence, and spread the ideals of the Revolution, he also betrayed the ideals of the French Revolution, became a dictator, and caused the deaths of thousands of people through his wars. Therefore, it is important to consider the multiple perspectives and evidence before coming to a conclusion about Napoleon's legacy. The evaluation of his actions must be based on a careful and critical examination of the historical context and the impact of his leadership on the people of France and Europe.
Which of these individuals was the president of the bank of United States Henry clay Daniel Webster Nicholas Biddle Martin van burden
Nicholas Biddle was the President of the Bank of the United States.
The Bank of the United States was a national bank chartered by the United States Congress in 1791 and was intended to improve the nation's credit and provide a stable and flexible currency. Nicholas Biddle served as the bank's president from 1823 to 1836.
The other individuals listed, Henry Clay, Daniel Webster and Martin Van Burden, were prominent political figures of the time but not bank presidents. Henry Clay was a U.S. Senator and Speaker of the House, Daniel Webster was a U.S. Senator and Secretary of State, Martin Van Burden was the 8th President of the United States.
To learn more about Bank of United States click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14338832
#SPJ4
The given question is incorrect. The correct question is given as:
Which of these individuals was the president of the Bank of United States?
A) Henry Clay
B) Daniel Webster
C) Nicholas Biddle
D) Martin Van Burden
how did the decision marbury v. madison increase the power of the judicial branch?
With his choice in Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall laid out the rule of legal audit, a significant expansion to the arrangement of "balanced governance" made to forestall any one part of the National Government from turning out to be excessively strong.
In his choice in the Marbury v. Madison case, he verified that the High Court can audit regulations and choose if they are sacred or not. This significantly expanded the force of that part of the government.
Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) Congress can't pass regulations that abrogate the Constitution, for example, by growing the extent of the High Court's unique purview.
Learn more about marbury v. madison:
https://brainly.com/question/9471911
#SPJ4
What do Brown' poetic obervation at a high chool footbal pep rally, in her poem "Mutang," reveal about the event' culture?
The poem "Muttong" by Brown reveals a culture of conformity, hypermasculinity, and aggression at the high school football pep rally.
The poem describes the scene at the high school football pep rally, where the students are dressed in matching uniforms and are participating in aggressive and hypermasculine rituals such as chanting and cheering.
The speaker observes the students' conformist behavior and the pressure to fit in and be a part of the group. The poem also highlights the aggressive nature of the event, with the students being encouraged to be fierce and competitive.
The culture at the pep rally is one of conformity, hypermasculinity and aggression, where students are pressured to fit in and participate in the aggressive and hypermasculine rituals.
The poem illustrates that the pressure to be part of the group, and the aggressive and hypermasculine nature of the event, can be dangerous, and it is revealing the negative aspects of this culture.
For more questions like Pep rally click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15840688
#SPJ4
What made the story of imperialism in Africa different—what were its unique experiences?
The scramble for African territories by European powers marked the unique experiences of imperialism in Africa.
This is led to the partition of the continent, the exploitation of natural resources, forced labor and the suppression of African cultures and traditions.
During the late 19th century, European countries such as Britain, France and Germany competed for territorial expansion and economic dominance in Africa, resulting in the Berlin Conference of 1884 - 1885. This conference partitioned the continent into different territories controlled by European powers without regard for the diverse cultural and linguistic groups living in those areas.
As a result Africans were subjected to forced labor, taxation and the loss of their land, resources and autonomy. The legacy of imperialism in Africa is still evident today with the continent struggling with underdevelopment, political instability and the effects of colonization on culture and identity.
Learn more about imperialism brainly.com/question/472625
#SPJ1
Briefly explain ONE effect that social and cultural changes had on
American literature in the period from 1865 to 1898.
(b) Briefly explain ONE effect that social and cultural changes had on the visual arts in the period from 1865 to 1898.
(c) Briefly explain ONE effect that economic and urban developments had on architecture in the period from 1865 to 1898.
The one effect that social and cultural changes had on American literature in the period from 1865 to 1898 is the Civil War in 1865.
The one effect that economic and urban developments had on architecture in the period from 1865 to 1898 is automobile industry.
What was Civil war?The Civil War was fought over the moral issue of slavery. The slavery and political control of the government system was central to the war. The territorial expansion was also a factor of civil war.
In the civil war the slaves demanded the states' rights. The Southern states wanted to have their authority over the federal government so that they could abolish federal laws which interfering with the South's right to keep slaves.
The one effect that social and cultural changes had on American literature in the period from 1865 to 1898 is the Civil War in 1865.
Learn more about civil war here:
https://brainly.com/question/5800989
#SPJ1
how did sharecropping help shape the social system of the postwar south? it empowered former slaves to become capitalists. it enabled rapid industrialization. it kept the population from moving north for jobs. it tied the southern economy to agriculture, particularly cotton.
Sharecropping was an important factor in shaping the postwar South's social system, empowering former slaves with capitalist opportunities, driving industrialization, driving people away from northern job opportunities, and tying the economy to cotton agriculture.
Sharecropping was an important factor in shaping the postwar South's social system. It enabled former slaves to become capitalists by granting them access to land and resources, setting up a tenant-farmer system in which landowners received a percentage of the crop yield. This in turn enabled rapid industrialization, as cotton cultivation was easier to mechanize than other crops. The system also kept the population from leaving the south to seek better job opportunities in the North, thus ensuring that the south's economy remained tied to agriculture, particularly cotton. Sharecropping also allowed landowners to maintain racial segregation, as African Americans were given far fewer rights and opportunities than their white counterparts. In this way, sharecropping had a significant and lasting impact on the postwar South's social system.
To know more about Sharecropping click below:
https://brainly.com/question/27264871#
#SPJ4
between the years 1948 to 1951, how many jewish people immigrated to israel?
Between 1948 and 1951, approximately 684,000 Jewish people immigrated to Israel.
This was part of a larger movement known as the Aliyah, which was a wave of Jewish immigration to the newly established state of Israel. This period of immigration was largely driven by the Holocaust, which had caused the displacement of millions of Jews from their homes in Europe.
Additionally, the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 provided a safe haven for Jews who had been persecuted in other countries. The Aliyah movement was also driven by a desire to reconnect with Jewish culture and heritage, as well as to build a new nation in the land of Israel. This period of immigration was a major factor in the growth of the Israeli population and the development of the modern state of Israel.
Learn more about immigration:
https://brainly.com/question/27959789
#SPJ4
Who wasat the top of Japanese society during its feudal period? Who held the real power
In reality, the shogun, or members of strong families ruling in the name of the shogun, controlled the real authority through the military while the emperor ruled only in name.
Who was at the top of Japanese society during its feudal period?The Emperor was at the absolute top of feudal Japanese society. He was more of a formality, though, for the majority of this time. The shogun, who served as a sort of prime minister, was in charge of actual authority. If the daimyo, the local lords, couldn't agree to his plans, the shogun had relatively little influence.
The Tokugawa bakufu was quickly formed in Edo, which is today known as Tokyo, thanks to the victory of the side commanded by the formidable daimyô Tokugawa Ieyasu. A 300-year period of peace and order would follow the end of centuries of conflict.
Thus, In reality, the shogun, or members of strong families ruling in the name of the shogun.
For more information about Japanese society during its feudal period, click here
https://brainly.com/question/18592489
#SPJ1
Explain the role nationalism played in shaping the identity and character of the people of southwest Asia.
Answer:
-The Ottoman Empire was forced to give up all its territories except for Turkey, who overthrew the sultan in 1923 and Mustafa Kemal became president. He was president of the first republic in Southwest Asia and wanted to modernize Turkey.
-Britain tried to take over all of Persia triggering a nationalist revolt and a Persian army officer Reza Shah Pahlavi took power. He wanted to modernize his country by making public schools, roads and railroads, promoting industrial growth and extending women's rights.
-Abd al-Aziz Ibn Saud succeeded in unifying Arabia and renaming it Saudi Arabia after his family. Carried on Islamic and Arab traditions but brought in modern technology but was limited to religiously accepted areas
Explanation: Just rephrase it when you answer your question!
Creat a T-Chart on the Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment.
The pros of capital punishment include:
Deterrance RetriubutionClosureThe cons of capital punishment include:
Injustice Racial bias Morality What is capital punishment ?Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the legal process of putting a person to death as a punishment for a crime they have committed. Supporters argue that the threat of the death penalty may deter people from committing crimes, as the punishment for certain crimes is severe.
Some people believe that capital punishment is a form of justice for heinous crimes, and that it serves as a means of retribution for victims and their families.
There is a risk of executing an innocent person, as there have been cases where people have been found innocent after being sentenced to death. There is evidence that the death penalty is applied disproportionately to people of color and those from lower socio-economic backgrounds.
Find out more on capital punishment at https://brainly.com/question/19238585
#SPJ1
Explain what mercantilism is in ONLY ONE sentence.
Having a strong military means that a country has a strong government (Truth or False)
Answer: False
Explanation: A country can have a weak military and have a strong government, and vice versa, because not all the military people do not, in particular, are in the government or work for the government.
Why are elections so critical to the democratic process
Answer:
Elections are critical to the democratic process because they are the means by which citizens can choose their leaders and hold them accountable for their actions. Elections provide citizens with the opportunity to participate in the political process, to express their opinions, and to influence the direction of their government.
Elections are a fundamental aspect of democracy as they ensure the peaceful transfer of power, safeguard citizens' rights and freedoms and provide a check on the actions of those in power. They are the mechanism through which citizens can choose the representatives they want to govern them, and they are the means of holding those representatives accountable to the people they serve.
Moreover, Elections serve as a means of legitimizing the government, they give the citizens the power to select the leaders that they believe will best serve their interests, and they provide an opportunity for citizens to hold their representatives accountable.
Elections also provide citizens with the ability to change government policies, hold their leaders accountable for their actions, and ensure that the government is responsive to the needs and concerns of the people. They ensure that the government is accountable to the citizens and protects their rights and freedoms, and that the government is responsive to the needs and concerns of the people.
In short, Elections are a crucial aspect of democracy as they empower citizens to have a say in the way their country is governed, to hold their leaders accountable and to participate in shaping their own future.
how many requests does the innocence project receive each year
The innocence project receive on an average of 400 requests each year where they help innocent people to get free, and create equitable systems of justice for everyone.
The Innocence Project is a nonprofit organisation that seeks to clear the names of guilty people using DNA testing after convictions. It also develops and puts into action policy improvements to avoid erroneous convictions and overall improve the criminal justice system.
They were able to support the release of many innocent people, and they have assisted in the exoneration of many innocent individuals from around the state who cumulatively spent over than 100 years for crimes which they did not commit. Nevertheless, they get around 400 requests for help a year on average, and that number is rising.
To learn more about Innocence Project here
brainly.com/question/24503591
#SPJ4
What characteristic of citizenship in the United States was drawn from ancient Athens?
Citizens run the government.
Citizens elect officials.
Citizens serve as judges.
Citizens serve in the military.
Is A. I did it by MYSELF because nobody answer it so it is A. On " he Influence of Athenian Democracy on the US " ( so now ya know some verified answer might show up idrk )
The characteristics of ancient Athens that affected citizenship in US is: Citizens run the government.. Option A
How do citizens run the government?Voting allows individuals to take part in the democratic process. Leaders are chosen by the people who will serve as their representatives and champion their causes. Only citizens of the United States have two particular privileges: the ability to vote in federal elections and to seek for federal office.
Demos kratos means "people power" in Greek. Even if individuals do not literally vote on every topic, the American system is predicated on the notion of a democracy where people have authority. Instead, they choose individuals (representatives) to cast ballots on their behalf.
Read more on government here: https://brainly.com/question/18464634
#SPJ1
lewis terman’s studies of gifted children indicated that ____
Lewis Terman’s study of gifted children indicates that His high IQ individuals ("Termites") were healthier, taller, and more socially adept than other children.
The Terman Study of the Gifted, subsequently known as the Genetic Studies of Genius, is the oldest and longest-running longitudinal study in the area of psychology. Lewis Terman founded it at Stanford University in 1921 to study the development and characteristics of gifted children into adulthood.
Terman's purpose was to debunk the popular perception at the time that bright children were unwell, socially incompetent, and unbalanced. As a result, the first volume of the study included information about the children's families, educational progress, special abilities, interests, play, and personalities. He also investigated the children's racial and cultural backgrounds.
To learn more about Terman, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/6620744
#SPJ4
jamaica competed in this 1988 winter olympic sport
Jamaica competed in one sport, Bobsled in this 1988 winter Olympic sports in both the two-man and four-man events.
Jamaica's presently bobsled team represented the country at its very first Winter Olympic Games in 1988. The Jamaican bobsled squad was afterwards became the subject of the film "Cool Runnings." Since then, Jamaica has participated in every Olympic Winter Games except for 2006, notably in the bobsleigh.
At the 1988 Winter Games, the bobsled team from the Caribbean nation stole the show. The tiny country is a major power in the Summer Olympics' athletics, but it is still vying for its very first medal at the Winter Games.
The question is incomplete, find the complete question here
Jamaica competed in which one sport in this 1988 winter Olympic sports?
To learn more about Winter Olympic Games here
brainly.com/question/27222473
#SPJ4
what is one improvement Roosevelt was likely to strive for?
One improvement Roosevelt was likely to strive for was an increase in jobs.
What was the way Rooseveltcan improve?The concept of the excerpt was how wilted leaves of industrial activity are everywhere; farmers cannot sell their produce; and thousands of people have lost the savings they had accumulated over many years.
More significantly, a large number of unemployed persons struggle with the harsh reality of life.
In response to the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented a series of domestic programs known as the New Deal that significantly increased the federal government's participation in the economy.
Learn more about Roosevelt at:
https://brainly.com/question/2066305
#SPJ1
the 1968 tet offensive select one: a. was a major political defeat for president lyndon johnson. b. was a military victory, in terms of the physical battles, for the united states. c. permanently depleted the ranks of the nlf. d. both was a major political defeat for president lyndon johnson, and was a substantial military victory for the united states. e. all these answers are correct.
President Lyndon Johnson suffered a significant political setback with the 1968 Tet Offensive. In terms of the actual combat, it was also a military triumph for the US and permanently reduced the NLF's strength. So. option E is correct.
More than 100 South Vietnamese cities and outposts were attacked in a coordinated fashion by the North Vietnamese during the Tet Offensive of 1968. The effort aimed to incite unrest among South Vietnamese citizens and persuade the US to reduce its engagement in the Vietnam War. Though the attacks were repulsed by U.S. and South Vietnamese forces, news coverage of the enormous offensive stunned Americans and reduced their support for the war effort. Despite suffering significant losses, North Vietnam was able to change the tide of the Vietnam War with the Tet Offensive and start the gradual, agonizing American withdrawal from the area.
To know more about 1968 Tet Offensive
brainly.com/question/27239902
#SPJ4
A British soldier
provided this
observation at
the beginning of
which war Chap 8 Study Guide
A British soldier provided this observation at the beginning of the War of 1812. Thus the last option is correct.
What are the causes of the War of 1812?The primary causes of the war of 1812 are The restriction of trade by the British and the desire Of America to expand its territory. These two events cause conflicts and give a rise to a significant war.
The United States' position among independent nations was permanently confirmed after the war of 1812. The soldier's observation is reflected stating that certain armies entering the town and being attacked by the windows.
Therefore, the last option is appropriate.
Learn more about the War of 1812, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13899658
#SPJ1
The complete question is probably
"...for scarcely had the party bearing the flag entered the street, than they wee fired upon from the windows of one of the houses..." A British soldier provided this observation at the beginning of which war?
answer choices
the American Revolution
the French and Indian War
the Spanish-American War
the War of 1812
How was the Philippine - American war a costly one for both the Philippines and the United States?
Casualties. The war had a high human cost. Over 200,000 civilians died as a result of the war, famine, or disease, while an estimated 20,000 Filipino troops were also lost.
What is famine?Famine is defined as a period of extreme and protracted hunger that affects a significant section of a region's population, causing widespread and acute malnutrition as well as mortality from starvation and illness.
Famines often only endure a short while, from a few months to a few years. They cannot go on endlessly, even if just because the population would eventually be wiped off.
Natural disasters such as drought, flooding, unseasonably cold weather, typhoons, vermin predation, bug infestations, and plant diseases like the blight that led to the Great Famine in Ireland are responsible for many famines.
The impacts of at least 75 famines occurred in France during the same period as well as numerous famines in medieval Britain. Russia was not exempt either; some 500,000 Russians perished from famine.
Learn more about famine, here
https://brainly.com/question/27026587
#SPJ1