Answer:
He believed that the Constitution that emerged from the convention was the best possible for the time and praised the document for being amendable.
What was an effect of the Servicemen's Readjustment Act?
A It ended segregation in all branches of the U.S. military.
B It created economic disparities between Black and white veterans.
C It established a minimum level of five million men for the U.S. Army.
D It established a draft system for all men between the ages of 18 and 25.
Help ASP please… :(
Option (c), For the U.S. Army, the Servicemen's Readjustment Act set a minimum of five million men.
What challenges did veterans encounter after the Second World War ended?Veterans faced a number of challenges when they got home from the war. Things like a lack of prior knowledge made it difficult to flourish, obtain job, and a place to live. After the end of the war, opportunities unexpectedly dried up. By 1947, at least two million American women were no longer employed.
What effects did the GI Bill of Rights have on veterans and the US economy?Moreover, it provided veterans with a year of unemployment benefits and paid for their medical bills. It also sponsored home loans. The Act was a great success, raising Americans' educational attainment and boosting the postwar economy.
Learn more about Servicemen's Readjustment Act: https://brainly.com/question/28862934
#SPJ1
7. CONTRASTING
Underline evidence in the text
of that shows how Thucydides'
study of history differed from
Herodotus'. Which historian's
view more closely reflected the
culture of the time and why?
Answer: 2nd paragraph 3 sentence
Explanation:
The Britist wanted to prevent fighting between the colonists and Native blank?
Answer: The Proclamation of 1763 was issued by the British at the end of the French and Indian War to appease Native Americans by checking the encroachment of European settlers on their lands.
Those who favored independence from Great Britain were called Patriots. Those who wished that the Colonies remain tied to Great Britain were known as Loyalists.
Each colony had its government, but the British king controlled these governments. By the 1770s, many colonists were angry because they did not have self-government. This meant that they could not govern themselves and make their laws. They had to pay high taxes to the king.
Describe one change in political structure that occurred in the Americas during the period 1450-1750
Answer:
One change in political structure that occurred in the Americas during the period 1450-1750 was the rise of powerful empires such as the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans, who controlled vast territories and established complex systems of governance. These empires were characterized by strong centralization of power, social stratification, and extensive trade networks.
Explanation:
The advent of strong empires like the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans, who ruled over enormous areas and had intricate systems of government, was one change in political organization that took place in the Americas between 1450 and 1750.
What one instance of a political structural shift that took place in the Americas?
Spanish Empire administration. sovereign monarchy. A monarch has unrestricted power and is often not subject to written laws, the legislature, or traditions. These monarchs are frequently hereditary.
These are the political developments that took place in the 15th and 16th centuries: During the 15th and 16th centuries, European rulers expanded their financial and military clout. They established strong new states. They were extremely important for Europe. In some parts of the world, empires fell, while in some places new imperial nations, like the Mongol khanates, took their place. Similar to Eurasia, the Americas and Africa also have state systems that have developed in extent and reach while exhibiting continuity, innovation, and variety.
Learn more about political:
https://brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ1
Arrange the events in chronological order.
Answer: Charles II took the English throne.
James II took the English throne.
James II proclaimed religious tolerance without consulting Parliament.
William of Orange came to England
Parliament passed the Bill of Rights
Explanation:
The events in chronological order are: Christopher Columbus discovering the Americas in 1492, the signing of the United States Declaration of Independence in 1776, the end of World War II in 1945, the first man walking on the moon in 1969, the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the September 11 attacks in 2001.
Explanation:1492: Christopher Columbus discovers the Americas1776: The United States Declaration of Independence is signed1945: The end of World War II1969: The first man walks on the moon1991: The fall of the Soviet Union2001: The September 11 attacks on the World Trade CenterLearn more about Chronological order of historical events here:https://brainly.com/question/32377461
#SPJ2
The question here is, if a person's religious beliefs conflict with the law or lead to bias against other groups, should the government protect the exercise of those beliefs? Why or why not? Are religious/moral exemptions ever appropriate/inappropriate? Under which circumstances?
Answer:
Explanation:
This is a complex and controversial issue that requires careful consideration of the principles of religious freedom, equality, and the rule of law. Here are some points to consider:
Religious freedom is an important human right that is protected by the Constitution and international law. Individuals have the right to practice their religion and hold their beliefs without interference from the government or others.
However, this right is not absolute and can be limited in certain circumstances. For example, the government can limit religious practices that are harmful to others, such as human sacrifice or religiously motivated violence.
Similarly, if a person's religious beliefs conflict with the law or lead to bias against other groups, the government may have a legitimate interest in limiting those beliefs. For example, if a person's religious beliefs lead them to discriminate against LGBTQ+ people or women, the government may have a legitimate interest in preventing that discrimination.
Religious exemptions may be appropriate in some circumstances, such as when they do not harm others or interfere with the rights of others. For example, allowing a religious group to use a public park for a religious ceremony outside of normal operating hours may not harm others or interfere with their rights.
However, religious exemptions can be inappropriate when they harm others or interfere with their rights. For example, allowing a business to discriminate against LGBTQ+ customers based on religious beliefs would harm those customers and interfere with their rights.
Ultimately, the government must balance the principles of religious freedom, equality, and the rule of law when considering religious exemptions. It must ensure that the rights of all individuals are protected, while also respecting the legitimate religious beliefs and practices of individuals and groups.
The government should consider protecting the exercise of religious beliefs that do not cause harm or discrimination against others. While individuals have the right to hold and practice their religious beliefs, these protections should be balanced with the need to prevent harm or prejudice towards others.
Religious/moral exemptions can be appropriate when they do not infringe upon the rights and well-being of others, allowing individuals to exercise their beliefs without adversely affecting others.
However, exemptions become inappropriate when they enable discrimination or deny essential services based on protected characteristics, as this goes against principles of equality and fairness.
Learn more about discrimination here:
https://brainly.com/question/14896067
#SPJ2
Help please
Examine the images above. The top one shows the amount of executive orders by presidents over the years, the other shows President Obama shredding the Constitution. What are they saying about executive orders?
The images are saying that executive orders have been used more and more frequently over time, and that President Obama has used them extensively.
What is Obama?Barack Obama is an American politician and the 44th President of the United States. He served as the first African-American President and was the first to be elected to two terms. Obama served as a Senator from Illinois from 2005 to 2008 and was the Democratic nominee for President in 2008 and 2012. His election in 2008 marked a historic milestone in the United States, and his presidency was marked by a number of significant accomplishments. Obama's initiatives included the Affordable Care Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. He also made several efforts to reduce US carbon emissions and expand diplomatic relations with other nations. During his presidency, Obama helped reduce unemployment, led the passage of several immigration reform bills, and supported marriage equality.
To learn more about Obama
https://brainly.com/question/1125105
#SPJ1
Why did Americans want to limit the number of immigrants coming from China?
Answer:
Many Americans on the West Coast attributed declining wages and economic ills to Chinese workers. Although the Chinese composed only 0.002 percent of the nation's population, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act to placate worker demands and assuage concerns about maintaining white "racial purity.
Explanation:
I HOPED THIS HELPED AND I AM ALWAYS OPEN YOU CAN ALWAYS ASK ME QUESTIONS AND GOOD LUCK BY THE WAY!
was the Vietnam War contrary to the spirit of the Great Society, or an extension of it?
Answer:
Instead of being a part of the Great Society, the Vietnam War can be seen as something that goes against it. The Vietnam War was a military conflict that took place in a different country, while the Great Society was focused on fixing problems at home and making life better for Americans through social programs.
The cost of the war took money away from the programs of the Great Society, making them less powerful and effective. Also, the war caused deep splits in American society and hurt the sense of unity and shared goals that were needed to reach the goals of the Great Society.
Also, the Great Society was built on the ideas of social justice, equality, and human rights. Many people thought that the Vietnam War went against these ideas. People said that the war was bad because it hurt civilians and caused a lot of damage and deaths.
So, we can say that the Vietnam War was not an extension of the Great Society, but instead went against its goals.
Answer:
Vietnam war is an extension of great society
Write an essay that describes how some Americans expressed their disapproval of the Vietnam War consisting of 3 to 4 paragraphs!
Answer:
The first major protests began in 1964 and quickly gained strength as the war escalated. Starting at the University of Michigan, “teach-ins” on the Vietnam War modeled after seminars raising consciousness in support of the Civil Rights Movement, brought in thousands of participants. Though the vast majority of the American population still supported U.S. government policy in the Vietnam War, a small but outspoken minority was making its voice heard by the end of 1965, especially after Johnson began an increasingly aggressive air and ground war in Vietnam.
Many Americans opposed the war on moral grounds, appalled by the devastation and violence of the war. Others claimed the conflict was a war against Vietnamese independence or intervention in a foreign civil war; others opposed it because they felt it lacked clear objectives and appeared to be unwinnable. Though the vast majority of the American population still supported U.S. government policy in the Vietnam War, a small but outspoken minority was making its voice heard by the end of 1965, especially after Johnson began an increasingly aggressive air and ground war in Vietnam.
The reason for the United States' involvement was due to the start of communism in North Vietnam. The citizens in South Vietnam feared the control of North Vietnam and were worried that the north would take control of the south. As reports from the field became increasingly accessible to citizens, public opinion began to turn against U.S. involvement, though many Americans continued to support it. Others felt betrayed by their government for not being truthful about the war. This led to an increase in public pressure to end the war.
More than two decades of violent conflict had inflicted a devastating toll on Vietnam's population: After years of warfare, an estimated 2 million Vietnamese were killed, while 3 million were wounded and another 12 million became refugees.
The Vietnam War was not simply the wrong war; it was also fought in the wrong way. Military force should only be used decisively, not gradually. Civilian officials should set basic policies but allow the professional military to run wars without micromanagement.
Hope this helps you! Have a good day!
Need help with this question please
Nationalism played a critical role in the revolutions in Europe by providing a sense of identity and purpose that united people across class and social divides, and by driving a desire for self-determination and independence from foreign powers.
What exactly is nationalism?Nationalism is a political ideology that emphasizes the importance of a shared national identity, culture, and history, and seeks to promote the interests of the nation-state above all other interests. It is often associated with a sense of pride in one's country and a desire to maintain its independence and sovereignty.
Nationalism can take many different forms, ranging from peaceful and inclusive to exclusive and aggressive. In some cases, nationalism has been used to promote positive values such as democracy, human rights, and social justice. However, it can also lead to intolerance, xenophobia, and aggression towards outsiders, particularly those who are seen as a threat to national identity or interests.
To learn more about Nationalism, click
https://brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ1
Scientists sometimes describe the canyon walls as a timeline. How is this description accurate?
Answer:
When scientists talk about the canyon walls as a timeline, they mean that the layers of rock in the Grand Canyon were created over millions of years and each one gives a glimpse into the past of the Earth. So if you were to climb down to the bottom of the canyon and check out the layers, you'd be looking at a timeline that goes back millions of years. Each layer of rock tells its own story about the conditions and creatures that were present at the time it was formed. For example, there might be fossils of ancient sea creatures, which shows that the area used to be covered by a sea. Or there could be sandstone or sedimentary rocks, which suggests that it was once a desert or a riverbed. So basically, scientists are saying that the canyon walls are like a book with pages full of stories about the Earth's past.
Answer: Canyons Reveal Earth's History
By studying the exposed layers of rock in a canyon wall, experts can learn about how the climate changed, what kind of organisms were alive at certain times, and perhaps even how the canyon may change in the future.
The oldest rocks exposed in the canyon are ancient, 1,840 million years old. Conversely, the canyon itself is geologically young, having been carved in the last 6 million years.
Geologists call the process of canyon formation downcutting. Downcutting occurs as a river carves out a canyon or valley, cutting down into the earth and eroding rock. Downcutting happens during flooding. When large amounts of water are moved through a river channel, large rocks, and boulders are carried too.
A compass rose indicates the directions north, south, east, and west.
TrueFalse
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A compass rose is a diagram that shows the directions of north, south, east, and west on a map or chart. It is usually represented as a circular design with arrows pointing towards the four cardinal directions, and sometimes includes additional intermediate directions such as northeast, southeast, southwest, and northwest. The compass rose is a common feature on maps and charts used for navigation, as it helps to orient the user and provide a reference for determining the direction of travel. Therefore, the statement "A compass rose indicates the directions north, south, east, and west" is true.
Answer: TRUE
Explanation:
This naturally occurring process causes 2 different climates on opposite sides of a mountain:
Answer:
The process that causes two different climates on opposite sides of a mountain is called orographic precipitation. This occurs when moist air is forced to rise over a mountain, causing it to cool and condense into clouds and rain. The side of the mountain facing the wind will receive more precipitation, while the side facing away from the wind will be drier. This can create two distinct climates on either side of the mountain, with one side receiving more rain and having a cooler climate, while the
Explanation:
To what extent did the geographical conditions accounted for the differences. The role of geography in shaping the socio-cultural practices of these two zones?
Geography shapes culture in large part, as do topographical features of the landscape, climate, and natural resources.
How did geography influence the evolution of various civilizations?The first civilizations emerged in areas where the geography favored intensive agriculture. As rulers gained control over larger areas and more resources, governments and states emerged, often using writing and religion to maintain social hierarchies and consolidate power over larger areas and populations.
What is the distinction between social and cultural geography?The study of space and culture, such as languages and traditions, is known as cultural geography. Social geography is the study of social issues in general; this can include inequalities, for example. -They're both quite similar; cultural geography is likely a subfield of social geography.
To know more about geographical visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/20068683
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELPPP ME i will mark brainlist to whoever answers first
Read all of “Letter from Birmingham Jail” written by Mather King Jr and Write 3 analytical paragraphs answering the following questions
1. What is the central purpose of the letter?
2. How do the allusions that King uses help the audience relate to him and his message?
3. What evidence does King give as to why he deserves to be in Birmingham?
4. According to King, what is the difference between just and unjust laws?
5. What metaphor does King use to close his argument? Why is effective?
Answer: Check Below
Explanation:
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a powerful and influential piece of literature that addresses the issue of racial inequality in the United States during the 1960s. The central purpose of the letter was to defend the nonviolent protests and civil disobedience of African Americans in Birmingham. King argues that these protests were necessary to bring attention to the injustices faced by Black people, and to force the white majority to take action to end segregation and discrimination. He argues that these actions were not only justified, but necessary in order to bring about change and achieve justice.
King's use of allusions throughout the letter helped his audience relate to him and his message by drawing on shared cultural and historical references. For example, he cites biblical figures such as Paul, Martin Buber, and Socrates to support his argument that nonviolent protest is a moral imperative. He also references historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln and Thomas Jefferson to demonstrate that civil disobedience has been a necessary and effective tool in the struggle for justice throughout American history. By using these allusions, King establishes a connection with his audience and makes his argument more persuasive.
King provides several pieces of evidence throughout the letter to support his claim that he deserves to be in Birmingham. He argues that he is a minister and civil rights leader who has been invited to Birmingham by local organizations, and that he has a responsibility to fight for justice and equality wherever he sees it being denied. He also points to his record of peaceful activism and leadership in the civil rights movement as evidence of his commitment to nonviolence and justice. By providing this evidence, King establishes his credibility and argues that his presence in Birmingham is not only justified, but necessary to bring about change.
In conclusion, "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a powerful and persuasive argument for the necessity of nonviolent protest and civil disobedience in the fight for justice and equality. Through his use of allusions, evidence, and persuasive language, King makes a compelling case for the moral imperative of nonviolent protest and the urgency of the struggle for racial equality in America. His letter remains a powerful reminder of the ongoing struggle for justice and the importance of continuing to fight for equality and human rights for all people.
What did the petition of right aim to prevent the monarch from doing? Select three options
The answers should be:
negotiating with foreign powers
imprisoning people without just cause
raising taxes without Parliament approval
Please help asap! The answer should be in the paragraph but I’m just not understanding it.
Madison's primary motivation for separation of powers i the national government is to provide each department of national agencies the freedom to conduct its own elections for members and internal affairs.
Provisions outlined in the constitution do not line up with Madison's reasoning as it states , that all the departments will have one superior to answer to in terms of authority.
Straightforward definition of constitution?The constitution serves as a political framework under which a nation's values and laws are created. The rights and responsibilities of people are there in the constitution. The constitution establishes how individuals and governments interact.
Why is it significant?A state's government is outlined in a constitution, which is a collection of laws and precepts. It serves as the foundation for all choices made by all members of the government, notably the legislature.
To know more about Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
Help please, is this right? (view attachment)
Which specific development prompted Harry Truman to issue the Truman Doctrine?
Answer:
Yes that is correct
Explanation:
when according to the source did the American stock market collapse
Answer:
american stock market collapsed on October 29, 1929
Explanation:
Answer: The most famous and significant stock market collapse in American history is commonly known as "Black Tuesday" and occurred on October 29, 1929. It marked the start of the Great Depression, which was a severe economic downturn that lasted throughout the 1930s.
Brainiest appreciated (:
What led to Syria being considered a failed state?
A.
An invasion led by U.S. forces forced Saddam Hussein out of power.
B.
King Abdullah chose 30 women to serve in the Consultative Council.
C.
A low GDP and the resulting poverty caused conflicts between its citizens.
D.
Large parts of the country came under the control of rebel groups and terrorists.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP!!!
Answer:
D. Large parts of the country came under the control of rebel groups and terrorists
Explanation:
Allow me to explain. Rebel formations control much of the state. The northern part of the country along the border with Turkey is largely controlled by the Al Nusra Front.
. The central and southern areas with Dara province as their center of control are the so-called The Free Syrian Army (FSA), while the east of the country, rich in energy and sparsely populated, is hold by ISIL, with a center in Raka.
⚫ On the side of the Syrian rebels, In addition to a portion of the indigenous population, numerous volunteers from countries around the world are at war, drawn by the Idea of global jihad.
What is the value of x?
Mathematics*
What was the Iran-Contra Affair?
A. Bush was found to have invaded Grenada without any cause
B. Bush was caught wiretapping Iranian citizen phones
C. Reagan was caught secretly selling weapons to Iran
D. Reagan had funded pro-Cuban terrorists in Nicaragua
Does the constitution and bill of rights define the government as a parent?
Answer:
No, the government is not referred to be a parent in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
No, the government is not referred to be a parent in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Instead, they build a democracy-based governmental structure with the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of government all sharing equal authority with the people. The government is not described as a parent in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, which outline the fundamental freedoms and rights of people and lay out the rules for how the government will function.
How were the shooters mentally able to execute women, children and men face-to-face and often with hand pistols 6 to 8 inches from the victims head? Even though the shooters became covered in blood and brains why did they continue to shoot hour after hour, day after day, week after week and month after month? How did German and other shooters justify murder to themselves?
I'm guessing you're talking about WWII and the German's "extermination" of the Jews and other "undesirables"?
Hitler had a strong influence on Germany and Austria even before her rose to power. In his novel, 'Mein Kampf', he blamed the Jews for the loss of WWI, so when he became Chancellor, he made sure the Jews and other "undesirables" were depicted as inhuman. So that, most-likely, made it far easier for soldiers to shoot innocent people with no signs of remorse.
HELP QUICKLY PLEASE! 10+ POINTS!
How does Hume explain causation? Please explain how he arrives at this conclusion?
The basic idea is that, although correlation or statistical dependence cannot determine the causal relationship between two variables, it can, under plausible assumptions, determine some causal relationships when three or more variables are considered.
How did southerners respond to the arguments offered by abolitions?
Answer: Southern state legislatures banned antislavery material. Southern hospitality for abolitionists was a rope with a noose or a whip. By the late 1830s, there were no known abolitionists in the South, and northern abolitionists were seen committing acts of violence against the South.
Abolitionists believed that slavery was a national sin and that it was the moral obligation of every American to help eradicate it from the American landscape by gradually freeing the slaves and returning them to Africa..
According to historian Frederick Jackson Turner, how did the frontier relate the concept of democracy?
Answer: Turner argued that the frontier had made the United States unique. Due to hardship, residents were forced to become resourceful and self-reliant. They developed strength and "rugged individualism," which in turn fostered the development of democracy.
The Frontier thesis was formulated in 1893 when American historian Frederick Jackson Turner theorized that the availability of unsettled land throughout much of American history was the most important factor determining national development.
How was Jesus's ministry similar to that of Elijah and Elisha?
Select one:
a.
They all hid in mountains.
b.
They were rejected in their homelands.
c.
They all taught in the same place.
d.
They were all known for curing lepers.
Answer:
It's D! Curing lepers.
Explanation:
Jesus's ministry was often compared to that of Elijah and Elisha because they all performed miracles, including healing the sick and raising the dead. In particular, they were all known for curing lepers, which was considered a particularly miraculous act as leprosy was a feared and incurable disease at the time. While there are certainly differences in the ministries of these three figures, healing lepers was a notable similarity that linked them together in the eyes of many followers.
Hope this helps! If not, I'm sorry! If you need more help, you may ask me! :]
How did Roosevelt’s Corollary change the original Monroe Doctrine?