Nora, the protagonist in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," recalls the last three years as a period of personal growth and self-discovery. Initially, she lived a sheltered life under her husband Torvald's control, acting as a submissive wife and doting mother. Throughout the three years, Nora experienced a series of events that challenged her identity and sense of self.
She took on the responsibility of secretly borrowing money to finance a trip for her husband's health, something that was frowned upon for women at the time. This decision marked the beginning of Nora's gradual awakening to her own capabilities and desires outside her role as a wife and mother.
As the play progresses, Nora becomes increasingly aware of her own individuality and the constraints placed on her by society and her marriage. She starts to question the unequal dynamics in her relationship with Torvald, and her frustration grows as she recognizes the extent of her husband's control and manipulation.
The culmination of these events leads to Nora's decision to leave her husband and children, asserting her independence and claiming her right to self-fulfillment. Thus, Nora recalls the last three years as a transformative journey from subservience and dependence to self-awareness and autonomy.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Nora recall the "last three years" CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/28271121
#SPJ11
What gives New York-style bagels
their color? Please help!!!
Answer:
New york-style bagels get their color from malt syrup.
Stanford bought a condo. He owns it as a fee simple absolute estate, so he holds all rights of ownership. Which of the following can Stanford NOT do?
Have three dogs, which violates the condo association covenants.
As the owner of a condo with a fee simple absolute estate, Stanford has full rights of ownership over his property. However, there may be certain limitations or restrictions imposed by the condo association covenants.
In this case, if the covenants state that residents are only allowed to have a maximum of two dogs, then Stanford cannot have three dogs without violating the covenant. Condo associations have the authority to set rules and regulations to maintain a certain standard of living within the community.
Violating these covenants could lead to penalties, fines, or legal action. It's important for condo owners to carefully review and understand the covenants before purchasing a property to avoid potential conflicts or violations.
While Stanford has all rights of ownership over his condo, he must still adhere to any applicable covenants and rules set forth by the condo association.
To know more about condo refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/19162414
#SPJ11
Hannah Senesh's life was influenced by many factors. Select one aspect of her life and in at least 100 words explore its influence on her work as a poet.
Hannah Senesh's commitment to the state of Israel and her Zionist views were two aspects of her life that had a big impact on her poetry. Senesh, who was born in Hungary in 1921, moved to Palestine in 1939 in order to live out her ambition of becoming a Jew in her own country.
Her loyalty to the Zionist cause and Senesh's experiences in Palestine had a significant impact on her poems. Her writings frequently convey her passion for Israel's people, culture, and land. Blessed is the Match burnt in kindling flame, she writes in her poem "Blessed Is the Match," which she wrote while undergoing paratrooper training in the British army.
Learn more about Hannah Senesh here:
https://brainly.com/question/3728033
#SPJ1
Select the correct vocabulary word
Jackie put just the right ______________ on the phrases in her speech
Answer: What are the answer choices.
Explanation:
Jackie put just the right emphasis on the phrases in her speech
The word that best fits the blank is "emphasis."
Emphasis refers to the special attention or importance given to something in speech or writing. When Jackie put just the right emphasis on the phrases in her speech, she likely used tone, volume, and pacing to give the phrases more weight and significance.
This can help to draw the listener's attention to the key points and arguments of the speech and make them more memorable.
Using emphasis effectively in a speech requires a good understanding of the topic being discussed and the message that the speaker wants to convey. It also requires an awareness of the audience and their needs and expectations.
By putting just the right emphasis on the phrases in her speech, Jackie was able to communicate her message clearly and effectively, and make a strong impression on her listeners.
To know more about speech refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/29586134
#SPJ11
2. Change into Narration:
a. She said to me, "Do you like oranges."
b. He said to his son. "Water is the basic necessity of life."
c. He exclaimed that those flowers were so beautiful."
d. We asked him if he liked to go to the park that evening.
Answer:
a. She asked me if I liked oranges.
b. He told his son that water is the basic necessity of life.
c. He exclaimed, "Those flowers are so beautiful!"
d. We inquired if he liked to go to the park that evening.
Explanation:
What does she say would be the "greatest miracle?"
The "greatest miracle" she mentions refers to an exceptional or extraordinary event that surpasses human understanding and natural laws. It's often seen as a divine intervention, bringing about positive change or serving as a source of inspiration and hope.
The specific context of the statement might vary, but the term "greatest miracle" generally signifies an event of utmost significance and impact.
In the midst of all these miracles, Matthew records what he probably considered the greatest miracle of all: That Jesus, the Son of God, would turn to him, a sinner, and say, “Follow me.” For all the miracles that take place, there is no greater miracle than being called to faith, and given the gift of life.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT greatest miracle CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/30772499
#SPJ11
select the word that means sticks out
Protrudes
Explanation:
Synonyms for STICKS OUT: protrudes, stand out, pokes, bulges, projects, beetles, juts, pouches; Antonyms of STICKS OUT: contracts, shrinks, compresses, condenses, refuses, rejects, declines.
And there's more information online.
3 adjectives to describe a.e. hintons life
The adjectival words that describe A.E. Hintons life are: Challenging, Inspirational, Impactful.
How would you describe A.E. Hinton's life?A.E. Hinton's life was filled with challenges because he experienced poverty and discrimination to struggling with her own health issues. Despite the obstacles, she used her experiences to create an impactful and inspiring stories that continue to resonate with readers today.
Some of her works like The Outsiders and That Was Then, This is Now touched the lives of many young people and continue to be taught in schools around the world. Her life serves as a proof to the power of resilience and determination in the face of adversity.
Read more about adjectives
brainly.com/question/550822
#SPJ1
How did the principles of transcendentalism and self-awareness contribute to gender and race equality in society from 1836- 1861
The Transcendental shifted their endeavors towards abolishing the system of slavery after advancing social reforms such as measures to expand freedom for women, laborers, and the poor.
The exaltation of the American venture as one of individualism and self-reliance was championed by the transcendentalists. On issues such as gender abolition, changes, and schooling, they adopted progressive stances.
Administration, organized religion, legal systems, social structures, and steadily advancing industrialisation were all criticised. From 1836 until 1861, the values of transcendentalism and being aware of oneself support equal treatment for all people.
Learn more about transcendentalism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10675328
#SPJ1
Miguel entered the office of Pilar, his manager, and was very excited about the success of his campaign. Pilar, however, did not display a similar level of excitement as she quietly said, "That's great." After this meeting with Pilar, Miguel returns three weeks later for a follow-up meeting after being removed as the campaign project manager. During this meeting, Miguel exhibits what type of listening style?- Nonverbal- Appreciative- Empathetic- Contingent- Discerning
Miguel exhibits an empathetic listening style during the follow-up meeting with Pilar. In the initial meeting, he was full of excitement about the success of his campaign.
However, Pilar's nonverbal cues and quiet response did not match his enthusiasm. As an appreciative listener, Pilar may have recognized the value in Miguel's work but did not outwardly express her excitement.
During the follow-up meeting, after being removed as the campaign project manager, Miguel is likely to have a change in his listening style. Empathetic listening involves understanding and connecting with the emotions and perspectives of the speaker. In this situation, Miguel would be more focused on understanding Pilar's reasons for removing him from the project and trying to see things from her point of view.
This listening style differs from the other options. Nonverbal listening would focus on body language and visual cues, which may not be relevant in this situation. Appreciative listening involves enjoying the content being shared, which is not applicable here. Contingent listening depends on the listener's reactions to specific events while discerning listening focuses on gathering information and distinguishing between essential and nonessential details. Neither of these styles fit Miguel's approach in the follow-up meeting.
In conclusion, Miguel's empathetic listening style allows him to better understand Pilar's perspective and the reasons behind the decision to remove him as the campaign project manager.
To leran more about empathetic listening style, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/28138852
#SPJ11
To what does Nora compare herself at the end of the play?
Answer:
she was a real woman not a doll
Explanation:
Why is a dramatic monologue effective in "The
Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock"? Check the three
best choices.
Readers relate to Prufrock's doubts and fears
when they're told in Prufrock's own voice.
A dramatic monologue is the best way to
convey Prufrock's confidence in himself.
An audience is more receptive to ideas that
are conveyed through a character's feelings.
It's easier to feel Prufrock's sense of
confusion and insignificance when he talks
about it.
The dramatic monologue is effective as:
A. Readers relate to doubts and fear when being said in Prufrock’s own voice.
C. An audience is receptive to views that are communicated through a character’s emotions.
D. To feel Prufrock’s sense of disorder and unimportance when he talks about it.
We can observe that the narrator focuses on the interactions involving Prufrock and his internal problems and self-doubts. Prufrock resumes his love song, which turns out to be, compared to a dramatic monologue, using thematic irony that produces the best effect through enabling Eliot's reader to see the things that Prufrock cannot perceive for himself nonetheless he still uncovers as he progresses.
Learn more about Prufrock, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17374596
#SPJ1
Answer:
A C D
Explanation:
Edge 2023
What do you call a flooded parcel of land that is used to grow rice or other semiaquatic crops?
A.
rain field
B.
paddy field
C.
inclave field
D.
riverbed
Answer: paddy feild
Explanation:
HELP PLEASEEE :(
Now that you have learned about various rules of grammar and explored some archetypes in A Midsummer Night's Dream, it is time to demonstrate your understanding.
In the space below, write an analysis of one character from A Midsummer Night's Dream , exploring what archetype they represent. Use examples from the text to support your claim. In addition to thoroughly analyzing the text, use at least one example of each of the grammar skills you have studied in this lesson, including: a participle, an infinitive, an example of active voice, an example of passive voice, a nonrestrictive clause, and a verb that expresses subjunctive mood. Highlight or bold each example in your response. Your response should be between two hundred fifty and three hundred words.
A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM, ACT III: VERBALS, ARCHETYPES, SUBJUNCTIVE
The character of Oberon in William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream is an excellent example of the archetype of the Wise King.
Oberon is the King of the Fairies and the husband of Titania. Throughout the play, Oberon demonstrates a superior knowledge of the mortal world, as well as a deep understanding of the magical world of fairies.
In Act III, Oberon exhibits his wisdom when he overhears a conversation between Bottom and his acting troupe. He recognizes that Bottom, despite his lack of knowledge about the magical world, is a source of great amusement, and so commands the fairies to "pluck from the memory a rooted sorrow" (3.2.118).
This is an example of an infinitive, illustrating Oberon's authority over the magical world and his wisdom in understanding the value of comedy. Oberon also displays his understanding of the power of love when he instructs Puck to apply the magical juice of a flower to Lysander's eyes as he sleeps. Oberon hopes that the juice will make Lysander fall in love with Helena, and in so doing, "overthrow [Demetrius'] fond love" (3.2.130).
To learn more about Oberon link is here
brainly.com/question/15464810
#SPJ1
Where has Nora just come from when the play begins?
In the play "A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen, Nora has just returned from shopping when the play begins. She is seen entering her house with a package of macaroons and is greeted by the housemaid, Anne Marie.
The play is set in the late 19th century and Nora's trip to the town for shopping was not just for buying household items but also for the purpose of secretarial work, which was not considered an appropriate profession for women at that time. Nora is depicted as a loving wife and mother, who is also resourceful and independent.
However, her husband, Torvald, treats her as a child and often patronizes her. Nora's trip to the town is significant as it marks the beginning of her journey towards self-discovery and questioning societal norms that restrict women's freedom and agency.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT A Doll's House CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/24867668
#SPJ11
What is a theme of “The Adventure of the Three Students?”
Responses
Even in an emergency situation, it is wise to speak before taking action.
Even in an emergency situation, it is wise to speak before taking action.
Friends are not always trustworthy.
Friends are not always trustworthy.
An active mind is a content mind.
An active mind is a content mind.
Even after making a mistake, it is possible to change by doing something positive.
Even after making a mistake, it is possible to change by doing something positive.
Question 2
\
\
An active mind is a content mind: is a theme of “The Adventure of the Three Students". Thus, option A is the correct option.
The Adventure of the Three Students essentially deals with a case of test fraud, which is not nearly as serious a crime as murder, blackmail, or the robbery of the crown jewels, but was handed to Sherlock Holmes due to the potential for controversy.
Physical action and brave heroes who protect others from peril or imminent disaster are hallmarks of adventure stories. The fast-paced adventure genre of literature typically centers on a protagonist (primary character) who finds himself or herself in a perilous or risky circumstance.
Learn more about Sherlock Holmes here:
https://brainly.com/question/31640217
#SPJ1
Explain the argument between Torvald and Nora over Krogstad.
The argument between Torvald and Nora over Krogstad centers around the latter's employment at the bank where Torvald is the manager. Krogstad is seeking to maintain his position at the bank, and Torvald initially expresses his desire to dismiss him due to his past wrongdoings. Nora, however, believes that Krogstad deserves a second chance and implores Torvald to spare him.
The argument escalates as Torvald accuses Nora of meddling in his affairs and behaving recklessly. He threatens to dismiss Krogstad and warns Nora that her actions could have dire consequences for both of them. Nora, however, remains steadfast in her belief that Krogstad should be given a chance to redeem himself, even going so far as to offer to plead his case to Torvald on his behalf.
Ultimately, Torvald relents and decides to keep Krogstad on at the bank, but the argument between him and Nora highlights the tension between their different values and priorities. While Torvald prioritizes maintaining order and following the rules, Nora values empathy and second chances, leading to a clash that threatens to unravel their relationship.
to know more about argument between Torvald and Nora over Krogstad. click this link -
brainly.com/question/29320740
#SPJ11
Help ASAP. This is very important.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
"Your liver, which lies under your stomach, removes waste from your blood and produces digestive juices."
lays -> lies, waist -> waste, produce -> produces
commas only appear when listing three or more things, in this case its just two :)
Rewrite the sentences using correct punctuation and capitalization.
1. when we were reading the book gone with the wind my teacher said this is an advanced book but you can read it without any problem
2. there are three things we need to buy at the grocery store shampoo soap and toothpaste
3. my friend said first we have to stop in atlanta georgia to buy a copy of the newspaper the atlanta daily
4. i just heard the song everything is awesome from the lego movie
5. susan can you please pass me the pepper asked Robert
6. tonight we have read three chapters the lady in red the man in yellow and the boy in blue
7. kecin lilian and thomas are on their way to ohio
8. yes you are allowed to watch the television show family guy with mom dad and grandma
9. the biggest problem he said is that the tire has a hole in it
10. Sandra told her sister you can use my umbrella if you want
Edit the following citation of a reference in text:
Using a version of Barr et al.'s (2003) SPC procedure, Townsend, 2007, preexposed infants toa new pair (instead of to the same pair) of puppets for 1 hr per day on successive days. One member of each new pair had been preexposed the day before, whereas the other member was novel. In Phase 1, Townsend, 2007, preexposed 6-month-old infants to a different pair of pupptes on each of 2 days (A+B, B+C).
The study by Townsend (2007) found that pre-exposure to a novel stimulus can enhance infant learning and discrimination.
How did Townsend's (2007) study investigate infant learning?The study conducted by Townsend (2007) used a modified version of Barr et al.'s (2003) SPC procedure to investigate how pre-exposure to novel stimuli affects infant learning. In the study, preexposed infants were shown a new pair of puppets for one hour per day on successive days. One member of each new pair had been pre-exposed the day before, while the other member was novel. The results showed that infants learned more about the novel puppet in the pair than the pre-exposed one. This suggests that pre-exposure to a novel stimulus can enhance infants' learning and help them to discriminate between similar stimuli. The study provides valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying infant learning and cognitive development.
Learn more about Townsend
brainly.com/question/9437199
#SPJ11
josh 7, acts 5:1-11. what are similarities between stories and what do both of these stories teach regarding hiding sin?
Both Josh 7 and Acts 5:1-11 tell stories of individuals who try to hide their sins, but ultimately face consequences for their actions. In Josh 7, a man named Achan secretly takes items that were supposed to be dedicated to God, and hides them in his tent. As a result, the Israelites are defeated in battle and suffer a great loss. In Acts 5:1-11, Ananias and Sapphira lie about the price of their land sale to the church, trying to hide their greed, and both end up dying as a result of their deception.
These stories teach us the importance of honesty and transparency when it comes to our actions and intentions. Trying to hide our sins only leads to further consequences and pain, not just for ourselves but also for those around us. Both Achan and Ananias and Sapphira thought they could get away with their deceit, but ultimately faced the harsh reality of their actions.
Furthermore, these stories also show us the significance of repentance and confession. When Achan finally confesses his sin, he is able to make amends and seek forgiveness. In Acts 5, if Ananias and Sapphira had been truthful and repented of their greed, they may have been spared from the consequences of their actions.
Overall, both Josh 7 and Acts 5:1-11 teach us that hiding our sins only leads to further pain and consequences, and that honesty and repentance are key to avoiding such outcomes.
To know more about Josh 7 and Acts 5:1-11 stories click this link-
brainly.in/question/6101735
#SPJ11
How did Dr. Rank announce his "death?"
Dr. Rank, a character in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," announces his impending "death" in a symbolic and discreet manner. Aware of his deteriorating health due to a terminal illness, Dr. Rank chooses to inform his close friends Nora and Torvald Helmer without causing distress or drawing attention to himself. He does so by leaving a calling card with a black cross on it, representing the traditional symbol of death. This black cross serves as a metaphor for his imminent demise and allows him to communicate the news in a subtle, yet clear manner.
By using this approach, Dr. Rank ensures that he maintains a sense of decorum and respect for his friends' feelings. The symbolic gesture also highlights the theme of deception and hidden truths that permeates the play, as characters grapple with the complexities of their relationships and societal expectations. In summary, Dr. Rank's announcement of his "death" through a black cross on a calling card demonstrates his desire for discretion, sensitivity, and an adherence to social conventions.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT A Doll's House CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/12446066
#SPJ11
6. Write the correct form of verb given in bracket:
a. We will go to party if he (invite).
b. If she (work) hard, she would get good grades.
The correct form of the verb is given in brackets:
a. We will go to the party if he invites us.
b. If she works hard, she would get good grades.
Any sentence that describes the occurrence of an incident or an action that occurred and helps the reader understand the context or setting of the background by indicating what the subject is doing is called a verb.
The subject-verb agreement rule states that if a sentence's subject is written in the singular, the verb must also be written in the singular. The verb used also has a similar pattern if the subject of any phrase is written in the plural form.
Learn more about verbs, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14574299
#SPJ1
Infer why both William Bradford and John Winthrop used allusion in Of Plymouth Plantation and "A Model of Christian Charity. " What examples of allusion can you find in William Bradford in from Of Plymouth Plantation and John Winthrop's "A Model of Christian Charity" to support your answer? In your answer make sure you have at least five to seven sentences and cite at least one line from Of Plymouth Plantation with page numbers (Bradford 3) and one line from "A Model of Christian Charity" OR two lines from "A Model of Christian Charity. " Please use correct grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling
Examples of allusion include: Moses would never be permitted to enter the Promised Land, according to Plymouth Plantation, and A good example of Christian charity is to think of ourselves as a city on a hill.
Numerous references to biblical scriptures or figures were made by both William Bradford and John Winthrop. The reason for this is that they wanted their audience to comprehend what they were discussing and how crucial the message they wished to deliver was. Bradford and Winthrop used allusions to increase readers' understanding of their texts by associating them with references the readers already knew.
The biblical allusions were crucial for both to accomplish their literary objectives because the Puritan community that comprised the audience for both contributed to their creation. A reference to something that already exists in another work or in the real world is known as an allusion.
To learn more about A model of Christian charity, click at:
https://brainly.com/question/29975381
#SPJ4
A popular Frank Sinatra song said that “Love and marriage go together like a horse and carriage.” How does Emma Goldman’s opinion differ? Which Does she value and why?
Answer:
hm
Explanation:
Emma Goldman was an anarchist and feminist activist who lived in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Her views on love and marriage were quite different from the traditional view expressed in Frank Sinatra's song.
Goldman believed that love and marriage were two separate entities and that marriage, as an institution, was inherently oppressive. She argued that marriage was a tool of social control used by the ruling class to maintain their power and reinforce gender roles. She believed that women, in particular, were often trapped in unhappy marriages that limited their freedom and autonomy.
Goldman valued love as a powerful and transformative force that could inspire people to break free from oppressive systems and relationships. She believed in the importance of emotional and sexual liberation and saw love as a means of achieving these goals.
Overall, Goldman's view of love and marriage was rooted in her broader political and social beliefs. She saw love as a force that could challenge and transform oppressive structures, while marriage was seen as a tool of those structures.
Read the sentence.
Anger lay coiled in the pit of her stomach, ready to strike at the slightest provocation.
What type of figurative language is used in the sentence?
The sentence uses a metaphor, comparing anger to a coiled snake in the pit of the stomach.
The sentence "Anger lay coiled in the pit of her stomach, ready to strike at the slightest provocation" uses a metaphor as the type of figurative language. It compares anger to a snake coiled in her stomach without using the words "like" or "as," suggesting that her anger is intense and easily triggered.
To know more about anger please visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3806823
#SPJ11
Now that you have synthesized your sources, notice emerging patterns or ideas that surface about your disruptor. Note the theme that emerges. Revisit your research question on page 2 of your Research Planning Guide. Think about the answers your sources provide. Now you will draft a claim statement for your research paper. Your claim statement will drive your research paper. Refer to your statement on page 1 of the Research Planning Guide for assistance.
In the aforementioned research, keep in mind that statements are debatable and must be supported by convincing arguments and relevant details. Note the categories of assertions for fact/definition, cause/effect, solution/policy, and value.
Choose the claim type that will allow you to address your study topic the most successfully. Consider the data you got from your sources. Do they concur with your assertions? Can they help you answer your research question in a meaningful way?
Example: How have Nelson Mandela's attempts to achieve racial equality affected initiatives to advance social justice in African American communities? For social justice activities in African American communities, the belief that Nelson Mandela's battle for racial equality inspired subsequent liberation movements served as a model.
Learn more about Research Planning Guide here:
https://brainly.com/question/28204699
#SPJ1
Stephen wants to write about one of many recent family experiences for a narrative essay, but he's not sure which one to choose. What can Stephen do to help him decide upon a working topic?
a. He can put slips of paper with topics on them into a hot and write about the first one he pulls out.
b. He can begin by asking questions about each experience to determine which one impacted him more than the others.
Option b is the best approach for Stephen to choose a working topic for his narrative essay. By asking himself questions about each family experience, he can determine which one left a lasting impact on him and would make for a compelling essay.
Some questions he could ask himself include: Which experience was the most emotional? Which one taught him a valuable lesson? Which one did he enjoy the most? Answering these questions can help Stephen choose a topic that he is passionate about and can write about effectively.
He can reflect on each experience and ask himself questions such as:
Which experience was the most memorable?Which experience had the strongest emotional impact on me?Which experience taught me a valuable lesson?Which experience can I write about in a way that will engage my audience?By asking these questions and reflecting on each experience, Stephen can narrow down his options and choose a working topic that he is passionate about and has a clear focus. This will help him write a more compelling and engaging narrative essay.
To know more about narrative essay, please click on:
https://brainly.com/question/891236
#SPJ11
What does Mrs. Linde say needs to happen in the Helmer household?
In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Mrs. Linde is a friend of the protagonist, Nora Helmer. Mrs. Linde believes that there needs to be a transformation in the Helmer household. She notices that Nora and her husband, Torvald, have an unequal relationship, where Torvald holds all the power and makes all the decisions.
Nora is not allowed to make any significant decisions without Torvald's permission. Mrs. Linde realizes that Nora's lack of agency is a result of society's expectations and Torvald's controlling behavior.
Therefore, Mrs. Linde suggests that Nora needs to become financially independent and gain control over her life. She proposes that Nora find work and establish herself as an individual with her own income, separate from Torvald.
Mrs. Linde argues that this is the only way for Nora to break free from her subservient role in the marriage and become her own person. In this way, Mrs. Linde advocates for female empowerment and independence, challenging the gender norms of the time.
to know more about A Doll's House click this link -
brainly.com/question/17105961
#SPJ11
What does Torvald seem to indicate about his role in his children's lives?
Torvald, in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," seems to indicate that his role in his children's lives is primarily as a provider and authority figure. He focuses on ensuring financial stability and setting rules, while leaving the nurturing and daily care to his wife, Nora. This reflects the traditional gender roles of the time in which the play was written.
Torvald seems to indicate that he is the sole provider and protector for his children. He takes pride in his ability to provide for them financially and sees himself as the ultimate authority figure in their lives. However, he also seems to view his role in their emotional and psychological well-being as secondary to his own desires and ambitions. He is quick to dismiss their concerns and feelings, and often views them as extensions of himself rather than independent individuals with their own needs and desires. Overall, Torvald's attitude towards his role in his children's lives is one of patriarchal control and dominance.
To know more about Torvald click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30955409
#SPJ11