I don’t understand what this means

Answer: there is 90 players in total

Step-by-step explanation:

6x 2= 12

78 + 12 = 90

Answer:

x=15

Step-by-step explanation:

6(x−2)=78 (or 6x−12=78), x=15

Answer: A.

Step-by-step explanation: Brainliest plz

Answer:

The answer is 1

Step-by-step explanation:

If you look at the number line and start counting from -8 and count 9 to the right then the number that you end on is the answer.

Answer:

A)  F(x) = 50 + ( x - 10 )*9  

B) Graph

C) lim ( x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50

Step-by-step explanation:

A) F(x) = 50 + ( x - 10 )*9       since the first 10 hours are included in initial fee

B) In Annex

C) lim (x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50 + ( 10 -10)*9

lim ( x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50 + 0

lim ( x ⇒ 10) F(x) = 50

Answer:

Are there answers

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

answer

Herman is standing on a ladder that is partly in a hole. He starts out on a rung that is 6 feet under ground, climbs up 14 feet, then climbs down 11 feet. ...

Answer:

= 3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Find 2 points on the graph

(2,3) and (6,6)

Using the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

   = ( 6-3)/(6-2)

   = 3/4

Answer:

The linear function would be:

C = 10t + 2

where C is the cost and t is time in months

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

area: 153.86

Circumference: 43.96 :D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{a=4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\log_xy=z\iff x^z=y\\\\\text{for}\ x\neq1\ \wedge\ x>0\ \wedge\ y>0\\==================\\\\\log_a81=4\iff a^4=81\\\\a^4=\underbrace{3\cdot3\cdot3\cdot3}_{=81}\\\\a^4=3^4\Rightarrow a=3[/tex]

Answer:

j=v-k/a

Step-by-step explanation:

It's like order of operations backwards. So first, you would get rid of the k, by subtracting it from both sides. Then, to isolate j you would divide both sides by a.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  C, M

Step-by-step explanation:

The second quadrant is the upper left quadrant. There, x-values will be negative and y-values will be positive.

__

Point G is on the boundary with the 3rd quadrant, so is probably not considered to be in either of those quadrants.

Answer: C M

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1.2in

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(1) 1.2 inches

Answer:

81

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

23.7m

Step-by-step explanation:

Given parameters:

       Time taken = 2.2s

     Acceleration due to gravity = 10m/s

Unknown:

Depth of the well  = ?

Solution:

To solve this problem, we simply apply one of the motion equations;

        S = ut + [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] gt²

    where S = depth of the well

                u = initial velocity

                t = time taken

               g = acceleration due to gravity

 Input the parameters and solve for S;

   Note initial velocity = 0;

     S = [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex] x 9.8 x 2.2²

    S = 23.7m

Answer:

8.6•10^-5 or 0.000086

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

just add up both alternate internal angles as they are both equal

so, the equation is: 2x-10 = 65-x

Answer:

The right equation will be 2x - 10 = 65 - x (you were wrong lol)

Step-by-step explanation:

We have: 2x - 10 = 65 - x

=> 2x - 10 + x = 65

=> 3x = 65 + 10 = 75

=> x = 75/3 = 25

P/S: After some little chats with the others, this might be wrong :(

Answer:

a) x = 798   is the quantity that maximizes the profit

b)po(x) = 401 $/unit

c)P(max ) = 636105 $

Step-by-step explanation:

The weekly demand function is equal to the price by unit and the Revenue function is weekly demand times quantity of units then:

R(x) = p(x) * x

R(x) = ( 800 - 0,5*x ) * x

R(x) = 800*x - 0,5*x²

The equation for the profit is:

P(x) = R(x) - C(x)

P(x) = 800*x - 0,5*x² - ( 300 + 2*x)

P(x) = 798*x - 0,5*x² - 300

a) P(x) = 798*x - 0,5*x² - 300

Taking derivatives on both sides of the equation:

P´(x) = 798 - x

If P´(x) = 0     then    798 - x = 0

x = 798   is the quantity that maximizes the profit

b) Selling price for the optimal quantity is:

p(x) = 800 - 0,5*x

p(x) = 800 - 0,5* 798

po (x) = 800 - 399

po(x) = 401 $/unit

c) Pmax = ?

P(x) = 798*x - 0,5*x² - 300    by subtitution of  x = 798

P(max) = 636804 - 399 - 300

P(max ) = 636105 $

a) The quantity that will maximize profit is [tex]100 \ units[/tex].

b) The selling of at this optimal quantity is [tex]\[/tex][tex]750[/tex] per unit.

c) So, the maximum profit is [tex]\[/tex][tex]25000[/tex].

A demand function is a mathematical equation that expresses the demand for a product or service as a function of its price and other factors such as the prices of the substitutes and complementary goods, income, etc.

The given demand function,

[tex]P=800-\frac{1}{2}x[/tex]

So, the revenue function is,

[tex]R(x)=p.x\\R(x)=800-x-\frac{1}{2}x^{2}[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow[/tex]Average cost is

[tex]\bar{C}=300+2x[/tex]

So, the total cost function is,

[tex]C\left ( x \right )=\bar{C}.x \\ C\left ( x \right )=300x+2x^{2}[/tex]

a) Profit function:

[tex]P\left ( x \right )=R\left ( x \right )-C\left ( x \right ) \\ =800x-\frac{1}{2}x^{2}-300x-2x^{2} \\ P\left ( x \right )=500x-\frac{5}{2}x^{2}[/tex]

For maximum,

[tex]{P}'\left ( x \right )=0 \\ 500\left ( 1 \right )-\frac{5}{2}\left ( 2x \right )=0 \\ 500-5x=0 \\ x=100[/tex]

b) Selling Price:

[tex]P=800-\frac{1}{2}x \\ at \ x=100 \\ P=800-\frac{1}{2}\left ( 100 \right ) \\ =\$ 750[/tex]

c) Maximum Profit:

[tex]P\left ( x \right )=500x-\frac{5}{2}x^{2} \\ P\left ( 100 \right )=500\left ( 100 \right )-\frac{5}{2}\left ( 100 \right )^{2} \\ P\left ( 100 \right )=\$ 25000[/tex]

Learn more about of Demand Function: https://brainly.com/question/25938253

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Given:

⠀[tex]f-¹(x)=\frac{x}{9}-\frac{5}{9}[/tex].

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • To find out:

⠀Is a function [tex]f-¹(x)=\frac{x}{9}-\frac{5}{9}[/tex] or not.

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Hello, ZoFlo2020!

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Answer (Response Explanation):

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀No, it is not. Such an example is not even possible to solve, to be honest. It doesn’t have a single solution to find at least an approximate part of its solution and answer.

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀;; ∥ • Sincerely, Your ElskerNorge! :)

⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀_____________

Answer:

( 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

also go to g-mail to check out my

Type in Brandon Acevedo

okay

Answer:

to?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that: The number of combination to select any k consecutive element from n consecutive term is given by the equation [tex]^{n-k+1}C_k[/tex]

[tex]= \begin {pmatrix} ^{n-k+1}_{k} \end {pmatrix}[/tex]

where:

n = 26

k = 5

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \begin {pmatrix} ^{26-5+1}_{5} \end {pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \begin {pmatrix} ^{22}_{5} \end {pmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \dfrac{22!}{5!(22-5)!}[/tex]

[tex]^{n-k+1}C_k= \dfrac{22!}{5!(17)!}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{^{n-k+1}C_k=26334}[/tex]

Therefore, there are 26334 selection of 5 episodes with no two consecutive episodes chosen

Answer:

# 10 is 4/3 or 1 and 1/3

#11 is 4/10 or 2/5

#12 is 2 and 3/4

#13 is 36/12 or 3 and 1/12

Step-by-step explanation:

i am not 100% sure on #13 btw

hope this helped!

p.s it would be cool if you gave me brainliest.

Answer:

Hey your answers on there are correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:djjdd

Please I love free points secy

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok but guys is 10009

Answer:

The final balance is $1,692.94.

The total compound interest is $392.94.

Step-by-step explanation:

1,300 x 0.045=___ x 6

Answer: Total cost for 1 ride = $11. Total cost for 2 rides = $14. Total cost for 3 rides = $17. Total cost for 4 rides = $20. Total cost for 5 rides = $23

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Responds to my friend

Decision rule

 Fail to reject the null hypothesis

Conclusion

There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of residents in California who are vegetarians is higher than the proportion in New Hampshire who are vegetarian  

Step-by-step explanation:

Here we are going to consider this question

For example, you may believe that the proportion of adults in California who are vegetarians is more than the proportion of adults in New Hampshire who are vegetarians. In two independent polls, you may find that 109 out of 380 California residents are vegetarians and 39 out of 205 New Hampshire residents are vegetarians.

Here we are going to be solving the hypothesis test problem and we will be making use of the p-value method

From the question the we are told that

     The first sample size is  [tex]n_1 = 380[/tex]

       The second sample size is [tex]n_2 = 205[/tex]

       The number of California residents that are vegetarian is [tex]k = 109[/tex]

       The number of New Hampshire resident that are veterinarian is [tex]u = 39[/tex]

Generally the sample proportion for California residents is

      [tex]\^ p_1 = \frac{k}{n_1}[/tex]

=> [tex]\^ p_1 =\frac{109}{380}[/tex]

=> [tex]\^ p_1 =  0.2868 [/tex]

Generally the sample proportion for New Hampshire residents is

     [tex]\^ p_2 = \frac{39}{205}[/tex]

=>  [tex]\^ p_2 = 0.1902 [/tex]  

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o  :  p_1 -p_2 = 0[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is  [tex]H_a :  p_1 -p_2 > 0[/tex]

 Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented  as

[tex]t  =  \frac{(\^ p_1 - \^ p_2 ) -0}{\sqrt{ \frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^p_1 )}{n_1}  + \frac{\^ p_2 (1- \^p_2)}{n_2} } }[/tex]

=> [tex]t  =  \frac{( 0.2868 - 0.1902) -0}{\sqrt{ \frac{0.2868 (1-0.2868 )}{380}  + \frac{0.1902(1- 0.1902)}{205} } }[/tex]  

=>  [tex]t  =  0.036[/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df  =  n_1 + n_2 -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  380 + 205 -2[/tex]

=>    [tex]df  =  583/tex]

Generally the probability of  [tex]t  =  0.036[/tex] at a degree of freedom of   [tex]df  =  583/tex]  from the t- distribution table is  

      [tex]p-value  =  P(t >  0.036) =  0.48564732[/tex]

Let take the level of significance to be [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

So from the values obtained we see that  [tex]p-value  >  \alpha[/tex] hence the decision rule is  

   Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

  There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of residents in California who are vegetarians is higher than the proportion in New Hampshire who are vegetarian