Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given a^2 + b^3 + c^4 = 55, we need to find the greatest value for a * b * c.
To solve this problem, we can use the AM-GM inequality, which states that the arithmetic mean of a set of non-negative numbers is always greater than or equal to their geometric mean.
Using this inequality, we have:
(a^2 + b^3 + c^4) / 3 >= (a*b*c)^(2/3)
55/3 >= (a*b*c)^(2/3)
(55/3)^(3/2) >= a*b*c
The maximum value of a, b, and c occurs when they are as close together as possible. We can use the fact that a, b, and c are distinct positive integers to determine that the closest they can be is 1, 2, and 3.
So the greatest value for a * b * c is (1*2*3) = 6, and we have:
(55/3)^(3/2) >= 6
Approximately: 23.1 >= 6
Therefore, the greatest value for a * b * c is 6.
The greatest value for abc is 3,240.
What is the greatest value for abc?We want to find the greatest value of the product abc, given that a, b, and c are different positive integers and a + b + c = 55.
To maximize the value of abc, we want to maximize each individual factor, a, b, and c. We can do this by setting a to be as small as possible and c to be as large as possible, while ensuring that a, b, and c are still different positive integers.
Since a, b, and c are different positive integers, the smallest value for a is 1.
To maximize c, we set b = a + 1 and c = 55 - a - b.
Substituting b and c in terms of a, we get:
c = 55 - a - (a + 1) = 54 - 2a
Now we can express the product abc in terms of a:
abc = a x b x c = a (a + 1)(54 - 2a)
Expanding this expression, we get:
abc = -2a³ + 53a²+ 54a
To find the maximum value of abc, we can take the derivative of this expression with respect to a and set it equal to zero:
d(abc)/da = -6a² + 106a + 54 = 0
Solving for a, we get:
a = 8.93 (rounded to two decimal places)
Since a must be a positive integer, we round up to a = 9.
Using this value of a, we can find the corresponding values of b and c:
b = a + 1 = 10
c = 55 - a - b = 55 - 9 - 10 = 36
Therefore, the greatest value of abc is:
abc = 9 x 10 x 36 = 3,240
Learn more about positive integers here: https://brainly.com/question/16952898
#SPJ1
The complete question is below:
If a, b, and c are different positive integers and a₂+ b₃ + c₄ = 55, Then what is the greatest value for abc= ?
The three interior angles of a triangle measure z degrees , (x+5)degrees , and (x+25) degrees. Which is the measure of one of the three angles?
The three interior angles of a triangle measure z degrees , (x+5)degrees , and (x+25) degrees. So, the measure of one of the three angles is x+5.
The sum of the interior angles of a triangle is always 180 degrees.
Therefore, we can write an equation using the given angle measures:
z + (x+5) + (x+25) = 180
Simplifying the equation, we get:
2x + 30 + z = 180
Subtracting 30 and z from both sides, we get:
2x = 150 - z
Dividing both sides by 2, we get:
x = (150 - z) / 2 - 5
So the measure of one of the three angles is x+5, which is:
x + 5 = [(150 - z) / 2 - 5] + 5
x + 5 = (150 - z) / 2
x + 5 = 75 - z/2
Therefore, one of the angles measures (x+5) degrees.
Learn more about triangle here https://brainly.com/question/2773823
#SPJ4
2x + y = 3
-3x + 2y = 20
Answer:
x
=
−
y
2
+
10
Step-by-step explanation:
Perform the indicated operation.
f(x) = −3x² + 3x; _g(x) = 2x+5
(ƒ + g)(3)
The composite function (f + g)(3) when evaluated from f(x) = −3x² + 3x and g(x) = 2x+5 is -7
Calculating the composite functionGiven that
f(x) = −3x² + 3x and
g(x) = 2x+5
To perform the operation (ƒ + g)(3), we need to add the functions ƒ(x) and g(x) first, and then evaluate the sum at x = 3.
ƒ(x) = −3x² + 3x
g(x) = 2x + 5
To add the functions, we simply add their corresponding terms:
(ƒ + g)(x) = ƒ(x) + g(x) = (−3x² + 3x) + (2x + 5)
When the like terms are evaluated, we have
(ƒ + g)(3) = −3x² + 5x + 5
Now, we can evaluate the sum at x = 3:
(ƒ + g)(3) = −3(3)² + 5(3) + 5
So, we have
(ƒ + g)(3) = −27 + 15 + 5
Lastly, we have
(ƒ + g)(3) = -7
Therefore, (ƒ + g)(3) = -7.
Read more about composite function at
https://brainly.com/question/10687170
#SPJ1
Right triangle STD has a longer leg measuring exactly 3√5 cm. The altitude from right angle T to hypotenuse
SD cuts the hypotenuse into two segments where the shorter part is 1 less than the longer part. Find the exact
length of each part of the hypotenuse, SU and UD, the exact length of altitude TU and the exact length of ST.
Answer:
Let's call the length of the hypotenuse SD as x.
Since the altitude from T to SD divides SD into two parts, let the length of the shorter part be y. Then the length of the longer part is x-y.
Using similar triangles, we have:
TU/TS = ST/TD
Substituting the values we have:
TU/(3√5) = √5/UD
TU = (3/5)UD
Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUS, we have:
TU² + (3√5)² = TS²
(3/5 UD)² + 45 = ST²
9/25 UD² + 45 = ST²
Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUD, we have:
TU² + UD² = TD²
(3/5 UD)² + UD² = x²
9/25 UD² + UD² = x²
34/25 UD² = x²
UD² = (25/34)x²
Substituting the value of UD² in the equation ST² = 9/25 UD² + 45, we get:
ST² = 9/25 (25/34)x² + 45
ST² = 45/34 x² + 45
Since y = x-y-1, we have y = (x-1)/2.
Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUD, we have:
(1/4) (x-1)² + UD² = x²
(1/4) (x² - 2x + 1) + (25/34)x² = x²
(1/4)(x²) + (25/34)x² - (1/2)x + (1/4) = 0
(59/68)x² - (1/2)x + (1/4) = 0
Using the quadratic formula, we get:
x = [1/2 ± √(1/4 - 4(59/68)(1/4))]/(2(59/68))
x = [1/2 ± (3√34)/17]/(59/34)
x = 17/59 ± 6√34/59
Since x is the hypotenuse SD, we have:
UD² = (25/34) x²
UD² = (25/34) [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²]
UD² = 136/59 ± 204√34/295
Therefore, the exact lengths of the two parts of the hypotenuse are:
SD = x = 17/59 ± 6√34/59
SU = x-y = (x-1)/2 = 8/59 ± 3√34/59
UD = y = (x-1)/2 = 8/59 ± 3√34/59
TU = (3/5) UD = (3/5) [8/59 ± 3√34/59] = 24/295 ± 9√34/295
ST² = 45/34 x² + 45 = 45/34 [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²] + 45
ST = √[45/34 [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²] + 45]
help please!! i have no clue how to do this without the answer to DC
Looks like your question already has an answer! https://brainly.com/question/22200751
Tell whether the given value is a solution of the inequality.
q/5 < q-20; q=15
Answer:
No, q=15 is not a solution to the inequality.
Step-by-step explanation:
As given, q=15. So, substituting is the best way to solve this problem.
Step 1: Substitute
[tex]\frac{15}{5}=3[/tex]
[tex]15-20=-5[/tex]
Step 2: Substitute values into inequality
[tex]3 < -5[/tex]
Equation is false since 3 is a bigger value than -5.
Hope this helps ya!
A town has a population of 12,000 and grows at 3. 5% every year. What will be the population after 7 years, to the nearest whole number?
If the population growth rate is 3.5 percent every year then the population of the town after 7 years would be 14940.
Given that population grows 3.5 percent every year.
So, the increase in population after one year
= 3.5% of 12000
= (3.5/100) × 12000
= 420
Thus the increase in population after 7 year would be,
= population increase in one year × 7
= 420×7 = 2940
Hence population of the town after 7 years = (present population + increase in population)
= 12000 + 2940
= 14940
So the population of the town after 7 years with 3.5 % growth every year would be 14490.
Visit here to learn more about the percent: https://brainly.com/question/28670903
#SPJ4
8x + 4 + 8x - 1 simplify the variable expression
I do not understand this
Pls help!
Answer:
16x + 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplify by combining like terms. Add the terms with x, then add the integers.
8x + 8x + 4 - 1 = 16x + 3
students test scores in an applied statistics courses are normally distributed with a mean of 70 and standard deviation of 10. what percent of the data falls below 40?
Percents of student failed in the test is 15.87%
Final grades are distributed normally.
Assuming mean, which is = 70
Provided that the standard deviation is 10,
Standard score or z-score refers to the normal random variable in a standard normal distribution. The following equation can convert each normal random variable X into a z score:
z=(X−μ)/σ
If X is a normal random variable, represents its mean, and represents its standard deviation.
For X=60 Z=(60−70)/10=−1
P(X<60)=P(Z<−1) \s =0.1587
Hence, 15.87% of pupils failed the test.
By dividing the sum of the given numbers by the entire number of numbers, the mean—the average of the given numbers—is determined.
Mean is equal to (Sum of All Observations/Total Observations).
To know more about standard deviation, click the below link
https://brainly.com/question/2043700
#SPJ4
20 POINTS NEED HELP DUE TODAY HELP!!!!!!
2. Is the point (-0.5, sin(4π/3)) on the unit circle? Explain your reasoning.
3. Is the point (-0.5, sin(5π/6)) on the unit circle? Explain your reasoning.
4. Suppose that sin(Θ) = -0.5 and that Θ is in quadrant 4. What is the exact value of cos(Θ)? Explain your reasoning.
1) The point is on the unit circle.
2) The point is not on the unit circle
3) cos(Θ) = 0.866
Is the point on the unit circle?We know that all the points on the unit circle have a magnitude of 1, then we can write:
√[ (-0.5)² + (sin(4π/3)²) = 1
This means that the point is on the unit circle.
b) Now the point is (-0.5, sin(5π/6))
We need to do the same thing, this time we will get:
√[ (-0.5)² + (sin(5π/6)²) = 0.71
So this point is not on the number line.
c) Here we know that sin(Θ) = -0.5 and the angle is in the quadrant 4.
Then Θ = Asin(-0.5) = -30°
Remember that -30° is on the fourth quadrant, so this is correct, now the cosine of that is:
cos(-30°) = 0.866
Learn more about unit circles at:
https://brainly.com/question/23989157
#SPJ1
1. if you repeated a hypothesis test 1000 times (i.e. 1000 different samples from the same population), how many times would you expect to commit a type i error, assuming the null hypothesis were true, if:
If we repeated a hypothesis test 1000 times, the number of times we would expect to commit a Type I error, assuming the null hypothesis were true, would depend on the significance level (α) of the test.
A Type I error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. The significance level of a test (α) is the probability of making a Type I error when the null hypothesis is true. In other words, if we set a significance level of α = 0.05, we are saying that we are willing to tolerate a 5% chance of making a Type I error.
Assuming a significance level of α = 0.05, if we repeated the test 1000 times, we would expect to make a Type I error in approximately 50 tests (0.05 x 1000 = 50). This means that in 50 out of the 1000 tests, we would reject the null hypothesis even though it is actually true.
However, it is important to note that the actual number of Type I errors we make in practice may differ from our expectation, as it depends on the specific characteristics of the population being tested and the sample sizes used in each test.
For more details about hypothesis click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29519577#
#SPJ11
the correlation coefficient between heights from the ground of two people on the opposite ends of a seesaw would be
The correlation coefficient between heights from the ground of two people on the opposite ends of a seesaw would depend on the weight of the people and their distance apart.
When the seesaw is in equilibrium, the height of the people will be related inversely proportional to their weight. If the weight of one person increases, the height of the other person would decrease and vice versa.
The correlation coefficient will be negative and can range from -1 to 0, with -1 being the highest correlation. The closer the correlation coefficient is to -1, the more closely related the heights of the two people will be. The correlation coefficient will be zero when the people are not in equilibrium.
This is because the height of the people is not related in any way when the seesaw is not in equilibrium. Therefore, the correlation coefficient between heights from the ground of two people on the opposite ends of a seesaw is negative and ranges from -1 to 0.
Know more about correlation here
https://brainly.com/question/27226153#
#SPJ11
Mark sold half his video game collection to his brother and then bought 16 more games at a yard sale. He now has 36 games. How many did he start with?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's start by using algebra to solve the problem.
Let x be the number of games that Mark started with.
Mark sold half of his games to his brother, so he sold x/2 games. This means he had x - x/2 = x/2 games after selling half to his brother.
He then bought 16 more games, so he had x/2 + 16 games.
Finally, we're told he now has 36 games, so we can set up the equation:
x/2 + 16 = 36
Simplifying the equation, we get:
x/2 = 20
Multiplying both sides by 2, we get:
x = 40
Therefore, Mark started with 40 games.
Answer:
Mark had 40 games to start with.
Step-by-step explanation:
You know this because you can take away the 16 games he bought, which leaves him with half of what he started with which is 20. And if 20 is half of his games you can double it to give you his starting number of games.
:)
Julie works Sunday,
, and Wednesday for 10 hours each day. On Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, she works 7 hours each day. She does not work on Saturday. Her weekly total earnings are $612
Julie hourly rate of pay from the given different rates of the day with total earning of $612 is equal to $12per hour.
Total number of hours Julie works in a week is equal to,
On Sunday = 10 hours
On Monday = 10 hours
On Tuesday = 7 hours
On Wednesday = 10 hours
On Thursday = 7 hours
On Friday = 7 hours
On Saturday = 0 hours
Total hours worked in whole week is
= 10 + 10 + 7 + 10 + 7 + 7 + 0
= 51 hours
Total money earned by Julie in whole week = $612
Hourly rate of pay = Weekly earnings / Total hours worked
Substitute the value we have,
⇒ Hourly rate of pay = $612 / 51 hours
⇒ Hourly rate of pay = $12 per hour
Therefore, Julie's hourly rate of pay is $12 per hour.
Learn more about rate of pay here
brainly.com/question/14458921
#SPJ4
The above question is incomplete , the complete question is:
Julie works Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday for 10 hours each day. On Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, she works 7 hours each day. She does not work on Saturday. Her weekly total earnings are $612. What is Julie's hourly rate of pay, in dollars?
in a sample of men, said that they had less leisure time today than they had years ago. in a sample of women, women said that they had less leisure time today than they had years ago. at , is there a difference in the proportions? use for the proportion of men with less leisure time
The test static for sample of 50 men, 44 said that they had less leisure time today than they had 10 years ago is 0.2377.
A number derived from a statistical test of a hypothesis is the test statistic. It displays how closely your actual data fit the distribution predicted by the statistical test's null hypothesis.
In order to determine whether to accept or reject your null hypothesis, the test statistic is utilised to calculate the p value of your findings.
In a sample of 50 men, 44 said that they had less leisure time today than they had 10 years ago.
In a sample of 50 women, 48 women said that they had less leisure time than they
had 10 years ago.
p-hat men:: 44/50 = 0.22
p-hat women:: 48/50 = 0.24
Test Stat:
z(0.24-0.22) =[tex]\frac{0.02}{\sqrt{[(0.22*0.78/50)+(0.24*0.76/50)]} }[/tex] = 0.2377
At [tex]\alpha[/tex] = .05, is there a difference in the proportions between the men and women
[tex]p-value = 2*P(z > 0.2377) = 0.8121[/tex]
Since the p-value is greater than 5%, fail to reject H.
H: p(men)-p(women) = 0
Ha: p(men)-p(women) # 0 = .05, is there a difference in the proportions between the men and women
p-value = 2*P(z > 0.2377) = 0.8121
Since the p-value is greater than 5%, fail to reject H.
H: p(men)-p(women) = 0
Ha: p(men)-p(women) # 0
Learn more about Test statistic:
https://brainly.com/question/15110538
#SPJ4
Complete question:
In a sample of 50 men, 44 said that they had less leisure time today than they had 10 years ago. In a sample of 50 women, 48 women said that they had less leisure time than they had 10 years ago. What is the test statistic? At [tex]\alpha[/tex] = .05, is there a difference in the proportions between the men and women?
1. What is the diameter of the circle above?
2.
What is the radius of the circle above?
Answer:
diameter = 34 radius = 17
Step-by-step explanation:
Look at the line in the middle of the circle that is the diameter, diameter is a straight line passing from side to side through the center of a circle.
radius is the distance from the center of the circle to any point on its circumference.
The line plot displays the number of roses purchased per day at a grocery store.
A horizontal line starting at 0 with tick marks every one unit up to 10. The line is labeled Number of Rose Bouquets, and the graph is titled Roses Purchased Per Day. There is one dot above 10. There are two dots above 1 and 4. There are three dots above 2 and 5. There are 4 dots above 3.
Which of the following is the best measure of center for the data, and what is its value?
The median is the best measure of center, and it equals 3.5.
The median is the best measure of center, and it equals 3.
The mean is the best measure of center, and it equals 3.
The mean is the best measure of center, and it equals 3.5.
Therefore, the best measure of center for this data is the median, and its value is 3.
What is median?The median is a measure of central tendency that represents the middle value of a set of data when it is arranged in order from lowest to highest (or highest to lowest). It is the value that divides the data set into two equal halves, with half of the values above and half below the median.
Here,
The median is the best measure of center for this data because it is skewed and not symmetrical. The value of the median can be found by ordering the data from smallest to largest: 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 10. The median is the middle value, which is 3.
To know more about median,
https://brainly.com/question/29156884
#SPJ1
what happens to the variability of the sampling distribution of the mean as the number of observations units increases?
Larger sample sizes typically result in more precise population mean estimates with lower sampling variability. Thus, when calculating population metrics like the mean, it is frequently preferable to utilize larger sample numbers.
The variability of the sampling distribution of the mean reduces with an increase in the number of observation units. The central limit theorem refers to this.
According to the central limit theorem, the sampling distribution of the mean gets more normal as the sample size grows, and its standard deviation (i.e., the standard error of the mean) drops. Particularly, the square root of the sample size has an inverse relationship with the standard error of the mean.
Learn more about mean here
https://brainly.com/question/15323584
#SPJ4
A math class is set up to have assignments worth 45%, quizzes worth 40% and the final exam is worth the rest of the grade. If Serena has 78% on assignments and 65% on quizzes and 96% on the final, what is her overall grade to 2 decimal places?
Serena's overall grade in the course is 75.5%. It's important to note that in a weighted grading system like this, the final exam is often a major determinant of the final grade.
To calculate Serena's overall grade, we need to first determine the weight of the final exam. We know that the assignments are worth 45% and the quizzes are worth 40%, which leaves 100% - 45% - 40% = 15% for the final exam.
Next, we can calculate Serena's grade for each component of the course. Her grade for assignments is 78% and her grade for quizzes is 65%. We can calculate her grade for the final exam by multiplying her score of 96% by the weight of the final, which is 15%:
Final grade = (0.45 * 78%) + (0.4 * 65%) + (0.15 * 96%)
Final grade = 35.1% + 26% + 14.4%
Final grade = 75.5%
Therefore, Serena's overall grade in the course is 75.5%. It's important to note that in a weighted grading system like this, the final exam is often a major determinant of the final grade. In this case, Serena's strong performance on the final exam helped to boost her overall grade, even though her scores on the assignments and quizzes were not as high. It's also worth noting that this calculation assumes that all assignments, quizzes, and the final exam were weighted equally within their respective categories (i.e., each assignment was worth the same percentage of the assignment grade).
To know more about determinant click here:
brainly.com/question/15362698
#SPJ4
Answer this for points
Click an item in the list or group of pictures at the bottom of the problem and, holding the button down, drag it into the correct position in the answer box. Release your mouse button when the item is place. If you change your mind, drag the item to the trashcan. Click the trashcan to clear all your answers.
Subtract the following polynomials, then place the answer in the proper location on the grid. Write your answer in descending powers of x.
Subtract 2x2 - 6x - 4
from 4x2 - 4x + 3.
The answer to subtracting the two polynomials is 2x2 - 10x - 7. The process of subtracting polynomials is like that of subtracting any other type of numerical expression.
What are polynomials?Polynomials are mathematical expressions consisting of variables, coefficients, and exponents. They are used to represent a variety of functions, such as polynomial equations, rational equations, and trigonometric functions.
In this case, our like terms are 2x2 and 4x2, and -6x and -4x, and -4 and +3. We begin by subtracting the coefficients of the like terms. We subtract the coefficient of the term with the highest power first. In this case, that is 2x2 and 4x2, we subtract 2 from 4 to get 2. Next, we subtract the coefficients of the terms with the second highest power. This is -6x and -4x, so we subtract -6 from -4 to get -2. Thus, our answer now reads 2x2 -2x.
Finally, we subtract the coefficients of the terms with the lowest power. This is -4 and +3, so we subtract -4 from 3 to get -7. Thus, our answer now reads 2x2 -2x -7.
This answer can then be placed in the proper position on the grid.
For more questions related to coefficients
https://brainly.com/question/28872453
#SPJ1
Exercise 3-23A (Algo) Using ratio analysis to assess financial risk LO 3-5
The following information was drawn from the balance sheets of two companies. Company Assets = Liabilities + Equity
East 206,000 91,000 115,000
West 603,000 169,000 434,000
Required
a. Compute the debt-to-assets ratio to measure the level of financial risk of both companies. B. Compare the two ratios computed in requirement a to identify which company has the higher level of financial risk
The answer based on debt to assets ratio for east and west company are,
East company debt to assets ratio is equal to 0.44.
West company debt to assets ratio is equal to 0.28.
After comparing both the company debt to assets ratio East company is at higher level of financial risk.
Assets = Liabilities + Equity
For East company,
206,000 = 91,000 + 115,000
Assets = 206,000
liabilities = 91,000
Equity = 115,000
For West company,
603,000 = 169,000 + 434,000
Assets = 603,000
liabilities = 169,000
Equity = 434,000
Debt-to-assets ratio = Total liabilities divided by the total assets.
Debt-to-assets ratio for East
= 91,000 / 206,000
= 0.44
Debt-to-assets ratio for West
= 169,000 / 603,000
= 0.28
Comparing the two ratios,
0.44 > 0.28
This implies,
Company East has a higher debt-to-assets ratio is greater than the compared to Company West.
This represents that Company East has a higher level of financial risk.
As larger proportion of their assets are financed through debt.
This shows it is difficult to repay if the company experiences financial difficulties.
Company West has a lower level of financial risk as smaller proportion of their assets are financed through debt.
Therefore, the answer of the following questions are,
Debt to asset ratio of east company = 0.44
Debt to asset ratio of west company = 0.28
Company east has a higher financial risk level .
learn more about debt to asset ratio here
https://brainly.com/question/18648883
#SPJ4
eric from exercise 3.30 continues driving. after three years, he still has no traffic accidents. now, what is the conditional probability that he is a high-risk driver?
The conditional probability that Eric is a high-risk driver, given that he has had no traffic accidents in the past three years, is very low. Generally, insurance companies use the number of traffic violations and/or the number of claims a driver has had within a certain time period as indicators of their riskiness.
As Eric has had no accidents or traffic violations, the probability that he is a high-risk driver is very low. However, this does not mean that the probability is zero. There are many other factors which can contribute to a driver's risk, such as age, gender, experience, and location.
If Eric is an experienced driver, who has been driving for many years with no traffic accidents, then the probability of him being a high-risk driver will be lower than the average driver. On the other hand, if Eric is a new driver, or is located in an area with a high rate of traffic accidents, then the probability of him being a high-risk driver may be higher than the average driver.
Overall, the conditional probability that Eric is a high-risk driver, given that he has had no traffic accidents in the past three years, is very low. However, this probability can change depending on other factors, such as his age, experience, and location.
See more about conditional probability at: https://brainly.com/question/23382435
#SPJ11
Solve each of the given inequalities for z. Which of the inequalities has 5 as a solution?
Inequality 1 Inequality 2
(4(2.8z + 1.75) > - 26.6) (2(1.9z + 1.5) <= 18.2)
Answer: Inequality 1
Step-by-step explanation: Let's solve each inequality first.
4(2.8z+175 )>-26.6
let's distribute the 4.
4(2.8z)+4(175)
11.2z+700>-26.6
Now let's isolate the variable by subtracting 700 on each side.
11.2z>-726.6
Now let's divide both sides by 11.2
z>-64.875
Oh? This one already has 5 as a solution as 5 is more than -64.875!
the weight of a miniature tootsie roll is normally distributed with a mean of 3.30 grams and standard deviation of .13 gram. (a) within what weight range will the middle 95 percent of all miniature tootsie rolls fall?
The weight range within which the middle 95% of all miniature Tootsie Rolls will fall is approximately between 3.04 grams and 3.56 grams.
Since the weight of miniature Tootsie Rolls is normally distributed with a mean of 3.30 grams and a standard deviation of 0.13 grams, we can use the standard normal distribution to find the weight range within which the middle 95% of all miniature Tootsie Rolls will fall.
We need to find the z-scores that correspond to the middle 95% of the normal distribution. The area between the two z-scores will be 0.95. Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the z-scores that correspond to the middle 95% of the distribution are -1.96 and 1.96.
We can use the formula z = (x - μ) / σ to find the corresponding weight values for these z-scores. Substituting -1.96 for z and solving for x, we get:
-1.96 = (x - 3.30) / 0.13
x = 3.04
Similarly, substituting 1.96 for z and solving for x, we get:
1.96 = (x - 3.30) / 0.13
x = 3.56
Therefore, the weight range within which the middle 95% of all miniature Tootsie Rolls will fall is approximately between 3.04 grams and 3.56 grams.
To know more about standard normal distribution table refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30404390#
#SPJ11
what happens to the sector area of a circle if you double its radius? what happens to the arc length of a circle if you double its radius? why do you think that happens?
The sector area of a circle is quadrupled when the radius is doubled. When the radius is doubled, the arc length of a circle is also doubled. This happens because the sector area and arc length are both dependent on the radius of a circle. Therefore, any change in the radius of a circle affects both its sector area and arc length.
Let us understand both these concepts in detail:
Sector area of a circle: A sector is a region of a circle, and the area enclosed by two radii and an arc is known as a sector area. The formula for the sector area of a circle is given by:
Sector Area = (θ/360)πr²
where θ is the central angle in degrees,
r is the radius of the circle,
and is a constant value.
If we double the radius of a circle, the sector area increases by a factor of 4. This is because the sector area is directly proportional to the square of the radius.
Hence, doubling the radius of a circle results in an increase in the sector area by a factor of 22 (four).
Arc length of a circle: The length of an arc is the distance between two points on a circle. The formula for the arc length of a circle is given:
Arc Length = (θ/360)2πr
where θ is the central angle in degrees,
r is the radius of the circle,
and 2pie is a constant value.
If we double the radius of a circle, the arc length also doubles.
This is because the arc length is directly proportional to the radius.
Hence, doubling the radius of a circle results in an increase in the arc length by a factor of 2.
To learn more about “Sector Area” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/22972014
#SPJ11
Gerald had some green and yellow beads. The number of green beads was 1/3 the number of yellow beads. He gave each of his friends 2 green beads and 3 yellow beads. He then had 42 green beads and 270 yellow beads left.
a. How many friends did he give the beads to?
b. What was the total number of beads he had at first?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's use algebra to solve this problem.
Let's start by assigning variables to the unknown quantities. Let G be the initial number of green beads and Y be the initial number of yellow beads.
We know that the number of green beads is 1/3 the number of yellow beads:
G = (1/3)Y
After giving away some beads, he had 42 green beads and 270 yellow beads left. So we can set up two equations using this information:
G - 2f = 42
Y - 3f = 270
where f is the number of friends he gave the beads to.
Now we can substitute G = (1/3)Y into the first equation:
(1/3)Y - 2f = 42
Multiplying both sides by 3, we get:
Y - 6f = 126
Now we have two equations that we can solve simultaneously:
Y - 3f = 270
Y - 6f = 126
Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get:
3f = 144
So f = 48. He gave the beads to 48 friends.
To find the total number of beads he had at first, we can use the equation G = (1/3)Y:
G + Y = (4/3)Y = (4/3)(270) = 360
So he had a total of 360 beads at first.
at the end of 2024, marin co. has accounts receivable of $673,200 and an allowance for doubtful accounts of $24,010. on january 24. 2025, it is learned that the company's receivable from madonna inc. is not collectible and therefore management authorizes a write- off of $4.147.
The write-off of the receivable from Madonna Inc. is a necessary adjustment to ensure the accuracy of Marin Co.'s financial statements. Without it, the company's accounts receivable would be overstated and their financial statements would not provide an accurate portrayal of the company's financial position.
At the end of 2024, Marin Co. had accounts receivable of $673,200 and an allowance for doubtful accounts of $24,010. On January 24th, 2025, it was determined that the company's receivable from Madonna Inc. was not collectible and management authorized a write-off of $4,147. This action reduces the accounts receivable balance by $4,147, and reduces the allowance for doubtful accounts by the same amount. The net effect on the balance sheet is a reduction of $4,147 in both accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts.
The impact of the write-off on the company's financial statements is a decrease in net income for the period. This is because a write-off is recognized as an expense, which reduces the amount of net income reported in the period. The amount of the write-off is recorded as an expense on the income statement. In this case, the amount of the write-off is $4,147.
The journal entry to record the write-off would be: Accounts Receivable 4,147; Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 4,147. This entry reduces the accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts by $4,147. The write-off of $4,147 is recorded as an expense on the income statement, and this reduces the net income reported for the period.
for such more questions on financial statements
https://brainly.com/question/26240841
#SPJ11
Error Analysis-Terrence constructed the circumscribed circle for triangle xyz. Explain Terrence's error.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4. Small amounts of weight are often measured in grams or ounces. Recall from Exercise #6
that there are 16 ounces per pound. Grams are even smaller. Camilla weighs an onion and
finds that it is 112 grams. On another scale, she finds that it weighs four ounces.
(a) Using the information from Camilla's onion,determine the ratio of grams to ounces.State as a unit rate using proper “per” units
Thus, Camilla's onion weighs about 28 grammes per ounce in terms of grammes to ounces.
What exactly is weight?Weight is the force of gravity that pulls objects towards the centre of the Earth. The resulting force that pulls a substance towards Earth is known as gravity. In contrast to gravity force, which occurs among any two masses, this only occurs between Planet and a mass.
To convert from grams to ounces, we can use the conversion factor of 1 ounce = 28.35 grams. Therefore:
1 gram = 1/28.35 ounces
To find the ratio of grams to ounces for Camilla's onion, we can divide the weight in grams by the weight in ounces:
112 grams ÷ 4 ounces ≈ 28 grams per ounce
So the ratio of grams to ounces for Camilla's onion is approximately 28 grams per ounce.
To know more about Weight visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25973294
#SPJ1