With different conceptualizations of nationalism in mind, research on a dispute that is currently happening between countries (you can choose a dispute between the Philippines and other countries or between other countries, not including the Philippines).
Using a PowerPoint presentation or Prezi, present to class the following:1. What the dispute is about:The dispute is about the sovereignty of the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. The Spratly Islands, also known as the Kalayaan Island Group, are a group of islands and reefs that are claimed by China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei. The Spratly Islands are strategically important because they are believed to be rich in oil and gas reserves.2. What led to the dispute:China's claims to the Spratly Islands are based on a historical basis, citing the use of the islands by Chinese fishermen and traders for centuries.
Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei also claim the islands on historical grounds, with each country asserting that the islands have been used by their fishermen and traders for generations. The dispute has escalated in recent years as China has built artificial islands and military bases in the area.
Read more about conceptualizations here;https://brainly.com/question/9383377
#SPJ11
Bilateral cross-cousin marriage refers to marriage of a O a man to the daughter of his father's brother and his mother's sister. O b. woman to the son of her father's sister and her mother's sister. O c. man to the daughter of his father's sister and his mother's brother, O d. woman to the son of her father's brother and her mother's brother.
Bilateral cross-cousin marriage refers to marriage of a man to the daughter of his father's brother and his mother's sister.
Bilateral cross-cousin marriage is a type of marriage that is common in some societies across the world. It is a form of cousin marriage in which a man marries the daughter of his father's brother and his mother's sister. It is important to note that in this type of marriage, both the maternal and paternal sides of the family are involved.
Other forms of cousin marriage include parallel cousin marriage, cross-cousin marriage, and double cross-cousin marriage. Parallel cousin marriage refers to marriage between the children of two brothers or two sisters. Cross-cousin marriage refers to marriage between the children of a brother and a sister, whereas double cross-cousin marriage refers to marriage between two sets of cross-cousins.
Bilateral cross-cousin marriage has both social and cultural significance in many societies. It helps to maintain family ties, inheritance patterns, and social status. In some societies, it is considered the preferred form of marriage, while in others, it is discouraged or even prohibited.
Learn more about Bilateral cross-cousin marriage: https://brainly.com/question/3474664
#SPJ11
It is well established that deep – level diversity
characteristics often form the basis for stereotypes.
True or false?
The statement "It is well established that deep-level diversity characteristics often form the basis for stereotypes" is true.
Deep-level diversity characteristics are attributes that are difficult to observe in others. They are often the most fundamental dimensions of diversity, such as personality, attitudes, and beliefs, among others.
Stereotypes are based on deep-level diversity traits such as race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and other characteristics. When these characteristics are used to make generalizations or assumptions about individuals, they become stereotypes.
These include attitudes, values, and religious beliefs. They are similar to hidden diversity in that they aren't distinguishable visually.
These can lead to discriminatory attitudes and actions, which can have harmful consequences for individuals and society as a whole.
To learn more about deep-level diversity, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32374628
#SPJ11
When choosing weights for a weighted moving average, the general rule states that the most recent periods should get the ________________ weighting.
As a general rule, when choosing weights for a weighted moving average, the most recent periods should get the highest weighting.
How to Choose Weights for a weighted moving average?When choosing weights for a weighted moving average, according to the general rule, it states that the most recent periods should get the highest weighting. This means that the weight assigned to the most recent data points will be greater compared to older data points.
The rationale behind this rule is to give more importance to recent information as it may be more indicative of current trends or market conditions.
Learn more about choosing weights for a weighted moving average on:
https://brainly.com/question/31657322
#SPJ4
If corporate managers are risk-averse, does this mean they will
not take risks? Explain.
Corporate managers who are risk-averse may still take risks, but they are more cautious and hesitant in doing so.
Risk-averse corporate managers exhibit a tendency to avoid or minimize risks due to their preference for certainty and stability. However, this does not imply that they will completely refrain from taking risks. Rather, their approach to risk-taking is more measured and calculated.
In the first step, the main answer is provided succinctly: risk-averse managers may still take risks, but they are more cautious.
Corporate managers who are risk-averse are often motivated by a desire to protect the company's assets, reputation, and stakeholders' interests. They prioritize minimizing potential losses and seeking safe, proven strategies. When faced with a decision involving risk, they are more likely to thoroughly assess the potential benefits, weigh them against the potential downsides, and consider various contingencies before making a move.
Risk-averse managers tend to rely heavily on data, analysis, and expert opinions to inform their decisions. They may conduct thorough market research, consult with industry experts, and seek out historical performance data to minimize uncertainty. This cautious approach can help mitigate potential negative outcomes and ensure the company's stability in the face of uncertainty.
However, the risk-averse nature of these managers can also have drawbacks. Overly conservative decision-making may hinder innovation and growth opportunities for the company. By excessively avoiding risks, they may miss out on potential rewards and competitive advantages that could have been gained by taking calculated risks.
In summary, while risk-averse corporate managers may still take risks, they do so cautiously and with a thorough assessment of potential outcomes. Their focus on minimizing losses and maintaining stability can be beneficial in certain contexts, but it may also limit the company's ability to seize new opportunities. Balancing risk aversion with a willingness to explore calculated risks can be crucial for long-term success in a dynamic business environment.
Learn more about Risk-averse
brainly.com/question/30641789
#SPJ11
provide an exposition of the main philosophical framework of Mill’s Utilitarianism; b) Elaborate two arguments of your own against any two aspects of Mill’s account c) Mill argues that it is better to be Socrates unhappy than swine pleased. What does he mean by this claim?
Mill's Utilitarianism is the philosophical framework that stresses the maximization of happiness for the greatest number of people. It is a consequentialist philosophy that judges the morality of an action by its results.
However, the philosophical framework of Mill’s Utilitarianism has two central themes. Firstly, it suggests that individuals have the right to their liberty and autonomy, which must be respected by society and the state. Secondly, Utilitarianism proposes that actions are only right or wrong based on their consequences and the extent to which they promote the overall happiness of all individuals within a society.
Two arguments against any two aspects of Mill’s account are: Utilitarianism is a moral theory that values the consequences of our actions over the intentions behind them. This implies that an action that creates happiness for the majority of individuals in society can be considered morally right, regardless of how many individuals are adversely affected. It is, therefore, possible for Utilitarianism to justify acts of cruelty.
The second argument is that Utilitarianism may be challenging to apply practically. The primary objective of Utilitarianism is to create the maximum happiness for the greatest number of individuals.
Learn more about Mill's Utilitarianism:
https://brainly.com/question/30484900
#SPJ11
Question 19 In "Moving toward an inclusive model of allyship for racial justice," we learned that in order to be allys, particularly aware of and allow for other identities and ideas to be brought into the conversation. Points out of 1.00 P Flag question O a. folks in privileged positions; their physical attributes O b. everyone; their physical attributes O c. folks in privileged position; space O d. everyone; power
The answer is option b. In order to be allies, everyone should be aware of and allow other identities and ideas to be brought into the conversation.
To be allies, it is important for everyone to be aware of and allow other identities and ideas to be brought into the conversation. Allyship for racial justice must not be about folks in privileged positions or their physical attributes, but it should be for everyone and their power. This implies that the concept of allyship must be inclusive, as racial justice involves all races. It should be a space where everybody's voices are heard and all ideas are acknowledged, irrespective of their racial background.
This approach is crucial in facilitating the exchange of different thoughts, perspectives, and experiences on race and racism to bring about change. Therefore, the article highlights the importance of the concept of allyship in racial justice, particularly its role in creating a conducive environment where people can address the issues of racial discrimination and bias.
To know more about racial justice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28780655
#SPJ11
in a study reported in the november 2007 issue of nature, researchers investigated whether infants take into account an individual's actions towards
The study provides insights into the early stages of moral development in infants and highlights the importance of positive social interactions in shaping their preferences and understanding of others' actions.
In a study reported in the November 2007 issue of Nature, researchers investigated whether infants take into account an individual's actions towards others. The study aimed to understand if infants have a sense of morality or an understanding of fairness.
To conduct the study, researchers observed how infants responded to different scenarios involving individuals interacting with others. They focused on actions that were helpful or harmful towards others. The researchers wanted to determine if infants would show a preference for individuals who behaved in a helpful manner.
The study found that infants as young as 6 to 10 months old showed a preference for individuals who exhibited helpful behavior towards others. They were more likely to be attracted to and show positive responses towards individuals who were kind and helpful.
This suggests that infants have some awareness of and preference for individuals who engage in prosocial behavior. They seem to have an inherent understanding of the positive value of kindness and helpfulness. However, it is important to note that the study focused on a specific age group and further research is needed to fully understand the development of moral understanding in infants.
To learn more about moral development
https://brainly.com/question/11982367
#SPJ11
Holland described interests as realistic, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional. He arranged these interests in a ________ to show the relationship of the interests to one another.
Holland arranged these interests in a RIASEC or hexagonal model to show the relationship of the interests to one another.
What is the RIASEC or hexagonal model?Holland arranged these interests in a "hexagonal model" to show the relationship of the interests to one another. The hexagonal model, also known as the Holland Codes or RIASEC model, places the six interests (realistic, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional) on the vertices of a hexagon.
The model suggests that individuals possess varying degrees of each interest and that the proximity of interests on the hexagon represents their relatedness. It helps individuals understand their own interests and preferences, as well as explore career options that align with their dominant interest types.
Learn more about RIASEC or hexagonal model on:
https://brainly.com/question/10724349
#SPJ1