Jen's total assets are $6,964. Her liabilities are $1,670 in credit card debt and $3,642 for a student loan. What is her net worth?
Responses

$1,652
$1,652

$6,964
$6,964

$5,312
$5,312

$12,276
$12,276

The simplest form of the given expression is -20k + 126.

To find the simplest form of the expression 8(5k+7)−10(6k−7), follow these steps:
1. Distribute the numbers outside the parentheses to the terms inside the parentheses:
  8 × 5k + 8 × 7 - 10 × 6k + 10 × 7
2. Perform the multiplication:
  40k + 56 - 60k + 70
3. Combine like terms (terms with the same variable and exponent):
  (40k - 60k) + (56 + 70)
4. Simplify the expression by performing the subtraction and addition:
  -20k + 126
The simplest form of the given expression is -20k + 126.

for such more question on simplest form

https://brainly.com/question/344788

#SPJ11

As a result, the final number or expression is g(g(1-3w)) ≈ -12w + 10 (without parenthesis).

When adding extraneous information or perhaps an afterthought to a sentence, parentheses, a pair or punctuation marks, are most frequently utilized. Two curving vertical lines can be seen in parentheses: ( ).

We must first evaluate g(1-3w) and then re-insert that result into g(x) in order to determine g(g(1-3w)).

We must first determine g(1-3w):

Substitute x with 1-3w to get g(x) ≈ 2x + 2 and g(1-3w) ≈ 2(1-3w) + 2.

g(1-3w) ≈ 2 - 6w + 2  (distribute the 2)

g(1-3w) ≈ -6w + 4 (combine similar terms) (combine like terms)

We can again again enter the result of g(1-3w) into g(x):

If you substitute g(1-3w) for x, then g(x) ≈ 2x + 2 g(g(1-3w)) ≈ 2(-6w Plus 4) + 2

g(g(1-3w)) ≈ -12w + 8 + 2 (allocate the 2) (distribute the 2)

g(g(1-3w)) ≈ -12w + 10 (combine comparable terms) (combine like terms)

To know more about parentheses visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28146414

#SPJ1

Answer:

N*r^n

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the initial number of cases at the start of year 1 be represented by N.

From the given information, we know that the number of cases increases by the same factor each year. Let this factor be represented by r.

Then, at the end of year 1, the number of cases would be N*r, since it has increased by a factor of r.

Similarly, at the end of year 2, the number of cases would be Nrr, or N*r^2.

At the end of year 3, the number of cases would be Nrrr, or Nr^3.

We can use this pattern to write a general expression for the number of cases after n years:

N * r^n

where N is the initial number of cases, r is the common factor by which the number of cases increases each year, and n is the number of years elapsed.

Isabella's net worth is $2,725.

We know that the net worth is nothing but a measure of an individual's financial standing at a given point in time.

Here, to calculate the net worth, we need to add up all of the assets and subtract all of her liabilities:

We can see that,

Assets

Car worth: $16,700

Savings account: $4,950

So, the total assets worth:

$16,700 + $4,950 = $21,650

Now liabilities:

Credit card balance: $925

And the rent for the remainder of the lease:

$1,500 x 12 = $18,000 for year

So, the total liabilities would be:

$925 + $18,000 = $18,925

Hence her net worth would be:

21,650 - 18,925 = 2,725 dollars

Learn more about the net worth here :

brainly.com/question/12294231

#SPJ4

The function f(x) has a decreasing end behaviour on the right when its leading coefficient is negative and its degree is greater than or equal to 2.

This means that the terms in the function must be decreasing from left to right and the last term must be negative. To illustrate, an example of a function with a decreasing end behaviour on the right could be

f(x) = -2x2 + 3x + 4.

The leading coefficient is -2, which is negative, and the degree is 2, which is greater than or equal to 2. The terms decrease from left to right, and the last term is negative, which both fulfil the requirements for the function to have a decreasing end behaviour on the right.

For more such questions on The function

https://brainly.com/question/29661677

#SPJ11

The factors that could be part of the function so that the function has a decreasing end behavior on the right are as follows: - A negative coefficient of the highest degree term.

- An odd degree of the highest degree term and a negative coefficient.
- An even degree of the highest degree term and a negative coefficient.
Explanation:
A function's end behavior refers to what happens to the function's values as x approaches positive or negative infinity. A function's end behavior is said to be decreasing if the values of the function decrease as x approaches infinity, and increasing if the values of the function increase as x approaches infinity.
There are three cases when the function has a decreasing end behavior on the right:

1. If the highest degree term has a negative coefficient, the function will have a decreasing end behavior on the right. For example, the function f(x) = -2x³ - 4x² + 3x + 6 will have a decreasing end behavior on the right.
2. If the highest degree term is odd and has a negative coefficient, the function will have a decreasing end behavior on the right.

For example, the function f(x) = -x⁵ + 2x³ - x will have a decreasing end behavior on the right.
3. If the highest degree term is even and has a negative coefficient, the function will have a decreasing end behavior on the right. For example, the function f(x) = -4x⁶ + 3x⁴ - 2x² + 1 will have a decreasing end behavior on the right.

For similar question on coefficient.

https://brainly.com/question/27969435

#SPJ11

Answer:

a) 640 ml

b) 40 ml

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio of lime to lemonade for the fizzy drink is 5 : 3 or as a fraction that would be

[tex]\dfrac{\text{Lime juice}}{\text{Lemonade}}= \dfrac{5}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Therefore the ratio of lemonade to lime }\\\\ = \text{reciprocal of $ \dfrac{5}{3} $} }\\\\= \dfrac{3}{5}[/tex]

Part a)

For  all 400 ml of  lime juice we would need
[tex]\dfrac{3}{5} \times 400 \;ml = 3 \times 80 = 240 \;ml[/tex]  

Total amount of fizzy drink that can be maade
= amount of lime juice + amount of lemonade

= 400 + 240

= 640 ml

This is the answer to Part a)

Part b)

If Gianni has only 280 ml and is using all 400 ml of lime juice then the amount of lemonade used as calculated in part 1) is 240ml

That means the amount of lemonade left over = 280 - 240 = 40 ml

This connection makes smells particularly powerful in triggering memories and emotions.

The sense of smell is the most likely to call up mental images of specific sights, sounds, tastes, or smells. This is because the olfactory system, which is responsible for the sense of smell, is closely linked to the brain's limbic system, which is involved in emotions and memory. This connection makes smells particularly powerful in triggering memories and emotions.

The olfactory system, which is responsible for the sense of smell, is unique in its connection to the brain's limbic system, which is involved in processing emotions and memory. When we smell something, the odor molecules enter our nose and are processed by specialized sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium. These neurons then send signals to the olfactory bulb, which is located in the brain and is the first site of olfactory processing.

From there, the olfactory information is sent to several brain regions, including the amygdala and hippocampus, which are both part of the limbic system. The amygdala is involved in processing emotions and is responsible for generating feelings of pleasure, disgust, or fear in response to smells. The hippocampus, on the other hand, is involved in forming new memories and is responsible for encoding information about the context in which a smell is experienced.

The strong connection between the olfactory system and the limbic system makes smells particularly powerful in triggering memories and emotions. For example, the scent of freshly baked bread may evoke memories of childhood mornings spent in the kitchen with a loved one, while the smell of a certain perfume may remind you of someone special. Additionally, certain smells may elicit strong emotional responses, such as the smell of smoke triggering feelings of panic and fear in someone who has experienced a fire.

Overall, the sense of smell is closely linked to our emotional and memory centers, making it a powerful tool for triggering mental images of specific sights, sounds, tastes, or smells.

To learn more about smell visit: https://brainly.com/question/31103337

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You didnt attatch anything

The number of iterations increases. If there is a significant difference between the two solutions, we may need to investigate the numerical method used or check for errors in our analytical solution.

Step-by-step explanation:

The differential equation is missing in your question. However, I will give a general overview of how to solve a differential equation numerically using Euler's method and how to find an analytical solution.

Numerical Solution using Euler's Method:

Suppose we have a first-order differential equation of the form y' = f(x, y), where y' represents the derivative of y with respect to x. To solve this numerically using Euler's method, we need to start with an initial condition y(x0) = y0, and we want to find the value of y at some other point x1 = x0 + h.

The Euler's method involves approximating the derivative y' by the difference quotient (y1 - y0) / h, where y1 is the value of y at x1. Rearranging this equation, we get:

y1 = y0 + h * f(x0, y0)

Using this equation, we can iteratively compute the value of y at different points by using the previous value of y. For example, to find y2, we can use the equation:

y2 = y1 + h * f(x1, y1)

We continue this process until we reach the desired endpoint.

Analytical Solution:

An analytical solution to a differential equation is an explicit expression for y(x) that satisfies the differential equation for all values of x. To find an analytical solution, we may use techniques such as separation of variables, integrating factors, or other methods specific to the type of differential equation.

For example, if we have a differential equation of the form y' = k * y, where k is a constant, we can use separation of variables to obtain:

dy / y = k * dx

Integrating both sides, we get:

ln|y| = k * x + C

where C is an arbitrary constant of integration. Solving for y, we get:

y = Ce^(kx)

where C = ±e^C is a constant determined by the initial condition.

Comparison of Solutions:

Once we have the numerical and analytical solutions, we can compare them by plotting the graphs of y(x) for each method. If the numerical solution was computed with a small enough step size, it should converge to the analytical solution as the number of iterations increases. If there is a significant difference between the two solutions, we may need to investigate the numerical method used or check for errors in our analytical solution.

To learn more about approximating visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30945002

#SPJ11

Answer:

If 15% of the dice were red, then the proportion of red dice is 0.15.

To find out how many red dice are in the pack, we can multiply this proportion by the total number of dice:

0.15 x 20 = 3

Therefore, there are 3 red dice in the variety pack.

Step-by-step explanation:

If 15% of the dice in the variety-pack are red, then the proportion of red dice to total dice is 0.15.

Let's represent the number of red dice as "x".

We know that the total number of dice in the pack is 20. Therefore, the number of non-red dice must be 20 - x.

We can set up an equation using the proportion of red dice:

x/20 = 0.15

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides by 20:

x = 20 * 0.15

x = 3

Therefore, there are 3 red dice in the pack.

Answer:

[tex]\large\boxed{\textsf{Central Angles are made up of 2 Radiuses.}}[/tex]

[tex]\large\underline{\textsf{What are Central Angles?}}[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Central Angles are angles inside of a circle. They're connected to the center of the circle.}[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Central Angles have measures determined where the 2 endpoints meet on the circumference.}[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Central Angles are made of 2 line segments called \underline{Radiuses}. They start at the Center.}[/tex]

[tex]\large\underline{\textsf{What are Radiuses?}}[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Radiuses are line segments connected from the center of the circle to the circumference.}[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Hence, Central Angles are made up of 2 Radiuses.}[/tex]

If det(n100) is equal to zero, then n100 is not invertible.

However, if det(n100) is non-zero, then n100 is invertible.

Given that the determinant of a matrix is a value associated with a square matrix, we can use det() to calculate the determinant of n100, as shown below: det(n100)

Based on this information, we cannot conclude whether or not n100 is invertible.

However, we can use the following statement to determine whether or not a matrix is invertible:

A matrix is invertible if and only if its determinant is non-zero.

If det(n100) is equal to zero, then n100 is not invertible.

However, if det(n100) is non-zero, then n100 is invertible.

Therefore, the determinant is an important tool that can help us determine whether or not a matrix is invertible.

Therefore, we must calculate det(n100) to determine if n100 is invertible or not.

For similar question on determinant.

https://brainly.com/question/24254106

#SPJ11

If the probability of a breakdown on assembly line 'a' is 12% and probability of a breakdown on assembly line 'b' is 16%, then the probability that assembly line 'a' or assembly line 'b' break down is equals to the 26%, i.e., 0.26.

We have the probability of a breakdown on assembly line 'a' = 12% = 0.12

The probability of a breakdown on assembly line 'b' = 16% = 0.16

The probability that both assembly lines break down = 2% = 0.02

Let's two events a breakdown on assembly line 'a' and a breakdown on assembly line 'b' be 'X' and 'Y' respectively. That is P(X) = 0.12, P(Y) = 0.16,

P(X and Y) = P(X∩Y) = 0.02

we have to calculate the probability that assembly line 'a' or assembly line 'b' break down, P( X or Y) = P(X∪Y). Using addition rule of probability, the probability that event A or event B occurs is equal to the probability that A occurs plus the probability that B occurs minus the probability that both occur. So, P( X or Y) = P(X) + P(Y) - P( X∩Y)

= 0.12 + 0.16 - 0.02

= 0.26

Hence, required probability is 0.26.

For more information about probability, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

Answer:

79.92m

Step-by-step explanation:

here you go hope this helps

The area of the walkaway is 216.66 feet squared.

The circular swimming pool has a diameter of 20 feet. A 3 foot tile walkaway is being installed around the pool.

Therefore, the area of the walkaway can be calculated as follows:

Hence,

area of the walkaway = area of the bigger circle - area of the smaller circle

area of the bigger circle = πr²

area of the bigger circle = 3.14 × 13²

area of the bigger circle  = 530.66

area of the smaller circle = πr²

area of the smaller circle  = 3.14 × 10²

area of the smaller circle = 314

area of the walkaway = 530.66 - 314  = 216.66 ft²

learn more on area here: https://brainly.com/question/16125353

#SPJ1

Answer:  (a-b+c)²-(b-c+a)²​

=((a-b+c)) - ((b-c+a)) ((a-b+c)) - ((b-c+a))

= (a-b+c-b+c-a) ( a-b+c+b-c+a)

= (-2b + 2c ) (2a)

= (2( -2b/2+2c/2)) (2a)

=(2(-b+c)) (2a)

=2(-b+c) (2a)

The linear correlation coefficient of 0.3 indicates a moderate positive correlation between the two variables.

This suggests that when one variable increases, the other variable tends to increase too. However, there is not a strong linear relationship between the two variables, meaning that the increase in one variable does not guarantee a predictable change in the other variable.


When interpreting the findings of a correlation study, it is important to note the strength of the relationship between the two variables. A linear correlation coefficient of 0.3 indicates a moderate positive correlation, meaning that the two variables increase together but there is not a strong linear relationship between the two variables.

This means that the increase in one variable does not guarantee a predictable change in the other variable. To put it another way, the strength of the correlation means that when one variable increases, it is likely that the other will increase as well, but it is not guaranteed.

Therefore, caution should be used when making predictions based on the results of a correlation study.

To know more about linear correlation coefficient click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/24881420#

#SPJ11

Answer:

To calculate the future value of an investment earning compound interest, we can use the formula:

FV = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

where:

FV is the future value

P is the principal (starting amount)

r is the annual interest rate (as a decimal)

n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year

t is the number of years

In this case, we have:

P = 6000

r = 0.18 (18% annual interest rate)

n = 12 (compounded monthly)

t = 8

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

FV = 6000(1 + 0.18/12)^(12*8)

FV = 6000(1.015)^96

FV = 6000(3.045)

FV = 18270

Therefore, the future value of $6000 earning 18% interest, compounded monthly for 8 years, is $18,270.

Check the picture below.

[tex]\cfrac{5^2}{10^2}=\cfrac{90}{A}\implies \cfrac{25}{100}=\cfrac{90}{A}\implies \cfrac{1}{4}=\cfrac{90}{A}\implies A=360[/tex]

The answer of the given question based on the Compound interest the answer is option a) Rounding to 2 decimal places gives D ≈ 824.50, so the closest option provided is a) 825. Therefore, the number that goes in box D is approximately 824.50, rounded to 2 decimal places.

In compound interest, term "principal" refers to the initial amount of money that is invested or borrowed. The principal is  starting point for calculating interest that will be earned or paid over time.

When you invest money at compound interest rate, interest earned is added to  principal amount, and  resulting sum becomes new principal for next interest calculation.

Based on the information provided in the image, we can calculate the value in box D by multiplying the values in boxes B and C and then dividing by 100:

D = (B × C) ÷ 100

D = (850 × 97) ÷ 100

D = 824.5

Rounding to 2 decimal places gives D ≈ 824.50, so the closest option provided is a) 825. Therefore, the number that goes in box D is approximately 824.50, rounded to 2 decimal places.

To know more about Amount visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30935846

#SPJ1

Total equity after adding the simple interest in the amount will be $825.

What is simple interest?

Simple interest is a type of interest that is calculated only on the principal amount of a loan or investment, without taking into account any interest that may have accumulated in previous periods.

In simple interest, the amount of interest earned or owed is calculated as a percentage of the principal amount, multiplied by the time period for which the interest is being calculated.

simple interest is found using

I = P * r * t

Where I is the amount of interest earned or owed, P is the principal amount, r is the annual interest rate as a decimal, and t is the              time period in years.

Now,

Assuming that the return rate of 10% is a simple annual interest rate, the total equity after one year can be calculated using the formula for simple interest:

Total equity = Principal + Interest

where the interest is calculated as:

Interest = Principal x Rate x Time

In this case, the principal is $750, the rate is 10%, and the time is one year.

Then,

Interest = $750 x 0.10 x 1 = $75

Therefore, the total equity after one year would be:

Total equity = $750 + $75 = $825

To know more about simple interest visit the link

brainly.com/question/25845758

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Setting A=45, we see that it is not true. However, you might find the following revealing:

sin2(45+A)=(sin45cosA+cos45sinA)2=12(1+2cosAsinA)

sin2(45−A)=(sin45cosA−cos45sinA)2=12(1−2cosAsinA)

Now, stare.

Answer: $5

Step-by-step explanation:

If you sell 3 shirts for $15 you would then just divide the 3 shirts into how much all together to get the price for each shirt for $5.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The smaller number would be 27. If the first number is 12 greater than the 2nd number and we have to make it equal to 66. Our smaller number would be 27 becuase if we add 12 to 27 that gives us 39. 39+27= 66. Hopefully that makes sense.

True, according to Hofstede, societies that accept strong hierarchical boss-subordinate relationships are high on power distance.

Power distance is a cultural dimension used by Hofstede that focuses on how society views and deals with inequality. A high power distance society has a deep respect for authority figures and the established order. Such a society usually has a complex hierarchical structure, with clear distinctions between high and low-status individuals. Low power distance societies, on the other hand, value egalitarianism and seek to minimize the distinction between high and low-status individuals.

Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-cultural communication that was first proposed by Geert Hofstede. It distinguishes national cultures into six dimensions, with each dimension ranging from "low" to "high."

Here are the six dimensions:

In conclusion, according to Hofstede, societies that accept strong hierarchical boss-subordinate relationships are high on power distance. True.

To know more about the "power distance": https://brainly.com/question/28537767

#SPJ11

Answer:

The value of t is 9.

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of a line passing through two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) is given by:

slope = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

In this case, we are given two points: (t, 5) and (10, -4), and the slope is given as -9. So we can set up the equation:

-9 = (-4 - 5) / (10 - t)

Simplifying, we get:

-9 = -9 / (10 - t)

Multiplying both sides by (10 - t), we get:

-9(10 - t) = -9

Expanding the left side, we get:

-90 + 9t = -9

Adding 90 to both sides, we get:

9t = 81

Dividing both sides by 9, we get:

t = 9

Therefore, the value of t is 9.

Answer:

x > -1

Step-by-step explanation:

8x - 4 > 3x - 9

5x - 4 > -9

5x > -5

x > -1

The simplification of the expression ( x^1/2)^1/6 × x^(1/3) is given by x to the 5 twelfth power.

Apply the rule of exponents representing raise a power to another power and product of the exponents with same base,

(a^m)^n= a^(mn)

( a^m ) × ( a^n ) = a^(m + n)

Here, x^(1/2) raised to the (1/6)th power.

Using the rule of exponents, we have,

x^((1/2) x (1/6))

Simplification of the product of the exponents, we get ,

= x^(1/12)

Now, multiply this by x^(1/3), so using the rule of product of exponents with same base we get,

x^(1/12) x x^(1/3)

Combining the like terms by adding the exponents, we have,

= x^((1/12) + (1/3))

Simplifying the sum of the exponents,

= x^(5/12)

Therefore, the simplification of the given expression is equal to  x to the 5 twelfth power.

Learn more about simplification here

brainly.com/question/10706975

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete, the complete question is:

Simplify open parentheses x to the 1 half power close parentheses to the 1 sixth power. X to the 1 third power

x to the 1 fourth power

x to the 1 twelfth power

x to the 2 thirds power

x to the 5 twelfth power

Answer: 41$

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because 5x6=30 (To find how much money is made)

then 11+30=41 (add both amounts)

The negation of the statement "There exists an integer n such that 6n2 + 27 is prime" is "For every integer n, 6n2 + 27 is not prime."

To prove the negation, we can use algebraic manipulation to show that 6n2 + 27 is always composite.

Suppose n is any integer. We can factor out 3 from 6n2 + 27 to get 3(2n2 + 9). Since 2n2 + 9 is always odd (2 times any integer is even, and adding 9 makes it odd), we can further factor it as (2n2 + 9) = (2n2 + 6n + 9 - 6n) = [(2n+3)(n+3)] - 6n.

Substituting this expression back into 3(2n2 + 9), we get 3[(2n+3)(n+3) - 6n]. Since (2n+3)(n+3) - 6n is an integer, 3[(2n+3)(n+3) - 6n] is composite for every integer n. Therefore, 6n2 + 27 is not prime for any integer n.

For more questions like Integer click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/490943

#SPJ11

Answer:

Choice B:  distance from home to library is length of HL

HL = 75      see calculations below

Step-by-step explanation:

use points (0,0) and (2.1, 7.2) to find HL:

HL = √(2.1 - 0)² + (7.2 - 0)² = √4.4 + 51.8 = √56.25 = 7.5