Kelsey's bank charged her $17. 50 for using her debit

card at ATMs that are not owned by her bank 7 times

in the last month.

A) Kelsey's bank loses $2. 50 each time Kelsey uses

her debit card at an ATM that is not owned by her

bank.

B) Kelsey is charged $2. 50 each time she uses her

debit card at an ATM that is not owned by her

bank.

C) Kelsey earns $2. 50 cach time she uses her debit

card at an ATM that is not owned by her bank.

D) Kelsey is charged S17. 50 each time she uses her

debit card at an ATM that is not owned by her

bank.

answer is option C

AC =~= BD

Answer: AC = BD this is because these two are of the same and exact equal lengths

The expected number of times one needs to flip a fair coin to get two consecutive heads is 6.

To find the expected number of times one needs to flip a fair coin to get two consecutive heads, we can use the concept of conditional probability.

Let E be the expected number of flips needed to get two consecutive heads.

On the first flip, there is a probability of 1/4 of getting two consecutive heads. If this does not happen, we have to start over and flip the coin again.

On the second flip, there is a probability of 1/4 of getting two consecutive heads, but we have already used one flip, so the expected number of additional flips needed is E.

Therefore, we can write the following equation:

E = (1/4)2 + (1/2)(E+1) + (1/4)(E+2)

E = (1/2)( 1 + E + 1 + E/2 + 1)

E = (1/2)(3 + 3E/2)

E = 3/2 + 3E/4

E/4 = 3/2

E = 6

Therefore, the expected number of times one needs to flip a fair coin to get two consecutive heads is 6.

Learn more about consecutive heads here

https://brainly.com/question/28453685

#SPJ4

Given vectors [tex]`u = [6 -3 0]` and `v = [1 4 -5]`[/tex]and we have to find the vector [tex]`w = 7ũ - 40`[/tex] and its additive inverse. Solution: The vector `w = 7ũ - 40` can be obtained as follows:
[tex]`w = 7u - 40 = 7[6 -3 0] - 40 = [42 -21 0] - [40 40 40] = [42 -21 -40]`[/tex]The additive inverse of vector w is `-w` which can be obtained by changing the signs of all the entries of `w[tex]`. So, `-w = [-42 21 40]`[/tex]Therefore, the required vectors are:
[tex]`w = [42 -21 -40]` and `-w = [-42 21 40]`[/tex]

To know more about vectors visit:

brainly.com/question/14447709

#SPJ11

The area of given regular hexagon is  509.22   square units.

For the given polygon,

Number of sides = 6

Since we know that,

A regular hexagon is a polygon with six equal sides and six equal angles. All of the sides and angles of a regular polygon are equal. A regular pentagon, for example, has 5 equal sides, whereas a regular octagon has 8 equal sides. When such prerequisites are not satisfied, polygons can take on the appearance of a variety of irregular forms. When six equilateral triangles are placed side by side, a regular hexagon is formed. The area of the regular hexagon is thus six times the size of the identical triangle.

Therefore,

It is called regular hexagon.

Since we know that,

Area of regular hexagon = (3√3/2)a²

Here we have a = 14

Therefore,

Area of given hexagon = (3√3/2)14²

                                       = 509.22   square units.

To learn more about polygons visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23846997

#SPJ1

Given that x has a normal distribution with mean µ = 100 and standard deviation σ = 18, the probability P(x ≥ 120) is to be determined.

The standardized value of x can be calculated as follows: z = (x - µ) / σHere, x = 120, µ = 100, and σ = 18.∴ z = (120 - 100) / 18 = 1.11From the standard normal distribution table, the probability P(Z ≥ 1.11) = 0.1335 (approx.)Thus, the main answer is option A. 0.1335 Probability P(x ≥ 120) can be calculated by standardizing x as follows: z = (x - µ) / σwhere µ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

Here,

we have: µ = 100,

σ = 18, and

x = 120∴

z = (120 - 100) / 18

= 1.11

Now, we can calculate the probability P(x ≥ 120) by using the standard normal distribution table as follows

:P(x ≥ 120)

= P(Z ≥ 1.11)

From the standard normal distribution table, we get:

P(Z ≥ 1.11)

= 0.1335 (approx.)

Therefore, the probability P(x ≥ 120) is 0.1335 (approx.)Thus, the main answer is option A. 0.1335.

To know more about distribution  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/15090366

#SPJ11

No, the data from the University of Illinois study do not provide convincing evidence at the α=0.05 level that the media report's claim is incorrect.

To determine if the University of Illinois study provides evidence against the media report's claim, we need to conduct a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis (H0) would be that the proportion of middle school students who engage in bullying behavior is 75%, as reported by the media. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be that the proportion is less than 75%.

Using the sample data from the University of Illinois study, we can calculate the sample proportion of students who admitted to engaging in bullying behavior in the last 30 days:

p^^ = 445/558 = 0.796

To test the hypothesis, we can use a one-sample proportion z-test with a significance level of α=0.05. The test statistic is:

z = (p^^ - p0) / sqrt(p0(1-p0)/n)

where p0 = 0.75 is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis, and n = 558 is the sample size.

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (0.796 - 0.75) / sqrt(0.75(1-0.75)/558) = 1.86

The critical value for a one-tailed test with α=0.05 is 1.645. Since the calculated z-value is greater than the critical value, we cannot reject the null hypothesis at the α=0.05 level. In other words, the sample data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of middle school students who engage in bullying behavior is less than 75%, as claimed by the media report.

Therefore, we cannot say with certainty that the media report's claim is incorrect based on the University of Illinois study data alone. It is possible that the true proportion is 75%, but the sample proportion of 79.6% was due to chance variation. Alternatively, the true proportion could be slightly lower than 75%, but the sample size was not large enough to detect a significant difference. Further research is needed to confirm or refute the media report's claim.

To learn more about sample data click here, brainly.com/question/29453029

#SPJ11

Answer:

H shot R

explain:

Because the R is next to the hoop

The marginal distribution of students that are in the 10th Grade is 28%

In probability theory and statistics, the marginal distribution of a subset of a collection of random variables is the probability distribution of the variables contained in the subset.

The P(10th grade) is determined by

∈P(A)= P( A and B₁) + P(A and B₂) + .....+ P(A and Bₓ) whereas B₁, B₂ and Bₓ are mutually exclusive and collective exhaustive events.

⇒100/870 + 32/870 + 108/870

= 240/870

reducing to lowest terms we have

8/29

≈28%

Learn more about marginal distribution on https://brainly.com/question/14310262

#SPJ1

Answer: Andiswa is 14 and Jonas is 11

Answer:

Heya Let's Calculate.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's form equation.

Let the age of Jonas be x.

Then, the age of Andiswa is x+3

Equation=

x+x+3=25

⇒2x+3=25

⇒2x=25-3

⇒x=25/5

x=5

To find an orthonormal basis of the nullspace of A, we first need to find the nullspace of A. The nullspace of a matrix A consists of all vectors x such that Ax = 0. We can find the nullspace of A by solving the system of linear equations Ax = 0.

Using row operations, we can reduce A to row echelon form:

[ 1 0 1 1 0 -1 6 4 ] -> [ 1 0 1 1 0 -1 0 1 ]

The pivot variables are x1, x3, and x4. We can express the non-pivot variables in terms of the pivot variables:

x2 = -x1

x5 = -x1 + x7

x6 = x1 - 6x7

Thus, the general solution to Ax = 0 is:

[ x1, -x1, x3, x4, -x1 + x7, x1 - 6x7, x7 ]

To find an orthonormal basis, we need to orthogonalize this set of vectors and then normalize them. One way to do this is to use the Gram-Schmidt process.

Using the Gram-Schmidt process, we can orthogonalize the set of vectors by subtracting their projections onto previously orthogonalized vectors. We can start by normalizing the first vector:

v1 = [ 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, -1, 0, 0 ] / sqrt(3)

Next, we can subtract the projection of the second vector onto v1:

v2 = [ 0, -1, 0, 0, 1, -6, 1, 0 ] - proj[0,-1,0,0,1,-6,1,0]v1

v2 = [ 0, -1, 0, 0, 1, -6, 1, 0 ] + [ 0, 1/sqrt(3), 0, 0, -1/sqrt(3), 2/sqrt(3), -1/sqrt(3), 0 ]

v2 = [ 0, -1/sqrt(3), 0, 0, 1/sqrt(3), -4/sqrt(3), 2/sqrt(3), 0 ]

Finally, we can normalize v2:

v2 = [ 0.41, -0.41, 0, 0, 0.41, -0.82, 0.41, 0 ]

Thus, the columns of the matrix [ 0.41, 0, -0.41, 0.82, -1, 0, 0, 0 ] form an orthonormal basis of the nullspace of A.

To learn more about row echelon form : brainly.com/question/30403280

#SPJ11

A model is a representation of reality or a real-life situation. The correct answer is E.

The correct answer is "model."A model is a representation of reality or a real-life situation. It can be used to simulate or describe the behavior of a system, process, or phenomenon.

Models are often used in various fields such as science, engineering, economics, and computer science to understand and analyze complex systems or make predictions about real-world scenarios.

A model is a simplified or abstract representation of a real-life situation or system. It captures the essential features or characteristics of the system while ignoring or simplifying irrelevant details. Models can be physical, conceptual, or mathematical in nature.

Learn more about model at https://brainly.com/question/14638586

#SPJ11

The value of u* in problem min x2 – (x1 – 2)3 + 3 subject to X2 > 1  is 2.

To find the value of u* in the given problem, we can utilize the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) conditions.

First, let's set up the Lagrangian function:

L(x, u) = x2 - (x1 - 2)3 + 3 - u(x2 - 1)

The KKT conditions are as follows:

Stationarity condition: ∇f(x) - u∇g(x) = 0

∂L/∂x1 = -3(x1 - 2)² = -u∂g/∂x1

∂L/∂x2 = 2x2 - u = -u∂g/∂x2

Primal feasibility condition: g(x) ≤ 0

x2 - 1 > 0

Dual feasibility condition: u ≥ 0

Complementary slackness condition: u * (x2 - 1) = 0

From the stationarity condition, we can deduce that 2x2 - u = 0. Combining this with the complementary slackness condition, we have two possible cases:

Case 1: u = 0

From 2x2 - u = 0, we get x2 = 0. However, this contradicts the constraint x2 > 1, so this case is not feasible.

Case 2: x2 - 1 = 0

In this case, we have x2 = 1, and from 2x2 - u = 0, we find u = 2.

Therefore, the value of u* in this problem is 2.

To know more about min refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15161624

#SPJ11

The linear function in the context of this problem is defined as follows:

y = 18 - 2x.

The slope-intercept equation for a linear function is presented as follows:

y = mx + b

The coefficients m and b represent the slope and the intercept, respectively, and are explained as follows:

When the input is of zero, the output is of 18, hence the intercept b is given as follows:

b = 18.

When the input increases by one, the output decreases by two, hence the slope m is given as follows:

m = -2.

Then the function is given as follows:

y = 18 - 2x.

More can be learned about linear functions at https://brainly.com/question/15602982

#SPJ1

The direction of the rescue boat, obtained by representing the location of the sailboat using vectors is N 8.7° E

A vector is a quantity that posses the properties magnitude and direction.

The vector form of the motion of the sailboat can be presented as follows;

d = 8 × sin(12)·i + 8 × cos(18)·j

The next direction of the sailboat = 3 miles south = -3 j

Therefore, the distance and direction of the sailboat is; 8 × sin(12)·i + 8 × cos(18)·j + -3 j

The direction the rescue boat has to leave from the dock in order to intercept the sailboat is; arctan(3 + 8 × cos(18))/( 8 × sin(12)) ≈ 81.26°

The direction relative to the North = 90° - 81.26° ≈ 8.7°

The direction of the rescue both is N 8.7° E

Learn more on the vectors here: https://brainly.com/question/30216531

#SPJ1

The expected number of students in the selected student's class, E(X), is approximately 21.91.

To find the expected value (E) of the random variable X, which represents the number of students in the selected student's class, we need to calculate the weighted average of X over all possible values of X.

Let's denote the number of students in each class as X1, X2, and X3, where X1 = 20, X2 = 22, and X3 = 25.

The probability of selecting a student from class 1 is P(X = X1) = 20/67, as there are 20 students in class 1 out of a total of 67 students.

Similarly, the probabilities for class 2 and class 3 are P(X = X2) = 22/67 and P(X = X3) = 25/67, respectively.

Now, we can calculate the expected value E(X):

E(X) = X1 * P(X = X1) + X2 * P(X = X2) + X3 * P(X = X3)

= 20 * (20/67) + 22 * (22/67) + 25 * (25/67)

≈ 21.91

Therefore, the expected number of students in the selected student's class, E(X), is approximately 21.91.

Learn more about expected number  here:

https://brainly.com/question/23915989

#SPJ11

The values of the missing parts are;

WX = 2.2

<X = 24. 6 degrees

<W = 65.4 degrees

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have that;

WX² = 2² + 1²

Find the value

WX² = 4 + 1

Add the values

WX = √5

WX = 2.2

Using the sine identity, we get;

sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse

substitute the values

sin W = 2/2.2

Divide the values

sin W = 0. 9090

Find the inverse

W = 65. 4 degrees

Then, we get;

X = 180 - 90 - 65.4

Subtract the values

X = 24. 6 degrees

Learn about triangles at: https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The series   [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}}$[/tex] converges. The given series converges.

To test this series for convergence  [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}}$[/tex] You could use the Limit Comparison Test, comparing it to the series

[tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n}$[/tex]  

where [tex]p=1 > 0$.[/tex]

Now, we will use the Limit Comparison Test to determine if the given series converges or diverges.According to the Limit Comparison Test,

if [tex]$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n}[/tex]  =[tex]c$[/tex] where [tex]$c > 0$[/tex],

then both [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$[/tex]

and [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n$[/tex] converge or both diverge.

That is  , [tex]$\bullet$[/tex] If  [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n$[/tex] converges,

then  [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$[/tex]  converges[tex].$\bullet$[/tex]

If [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n$[/tex] diverges,

then [tex]$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n$[/tex]  diverges.

Let [tex]$a_n = \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}}$[/tex] and

[tex]$b_n = \frac{1}{n}$[/tex]

Then, [tex]$\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n}[/tex] =  [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^{10}} \cdot \frac{n}{1}[/tex]

= [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{n^3 + n}{n^{10}}[/tex]

=[tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n^6}+ \lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{1}{n^9}[/tex]

=[tex]0$.[/tex]

Since [tex]\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} = 0$,[/tex]

which is a finite positive number.

To know more about series convergence visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29258536

#SPJ11

The limit of a(n) / b(n) is infinity, and b(n) is a known convergent series, we can conclude that the original series [tex]\sum (1/n^2 + 1/n)[/tex] also converges. The statement "Converges" is the correct answer.

To test the series [tex]\sum(1/n^2 + 1/n)[/tex] for convergence, we can use the Limit Comparison Test.

We will compare it to the series Σ(1/n),

which is a known series that converges.

Let's denote the original series as [tex]a(n) = 1/n^2 + 1/n[/tex],

and the comparison series as b(n) = 1/n.

We need to calculate the limit of the ratio of the terms of the two series as n approaches infinity:

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} a(n)/b(n)\\ \\ \lim_{n \to \infty} [(1/n^2 + 1/n) / (1/n)]\\\\ \lim_{n \to \infty} (n+1)[/tex]

As n approaches infinity, the limit of (n + 1) is infinity.

Since the limit of a(n) / b(n) is infinity, and b(n) is a known convergent series, we can conclude that the original series [tex]\sum(1/n^2 + 1/n)[/tex] also converges.

Therefore, the statement "Converges" is the correct answer.

To know more about convergent series, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32549533

#SPJ11

Rounding to three decimal places, the correlation coefficient between cost and miles is approximately -0.398.

To calculate the correlation coefficient between cost and miles, we need to first calculate the mean of the cost and miles, as well as the standard deviations of each variable. Then we can use the formula for the correlation coefficient, which is:

correlation coefficient (r) = Σ((x_i - x_mean) * (y_i - y_mean)) / (n * x_std * y_std)

Let's calculate it step by step:

Calculate the mean of cost (x) and miles (y):

x_mean = (171 + 397 + 270 + 88 + 438) / 5 = 272.8

y_mean = (941 + 3093 + 2003 + 433 + 3019) / 5 = 1581.8

Calculate the standard deviation of cost (x) and miles (y):

x_std = sqrt(((171 - 272.8)^2 + (397 - 272.8)^2 + (270 - 272.8)^2 + (88 - 272.8)^2 + (438 - 272.8)^2) / 5) ≈ 131.150

y_std = sqrt(((941 - 1581.8)^2 + (3093 - 1581.8)^2 + (2003 - 1581.8)^2 + (433 - 1581.8)^2 + (3019 - 1581.8)^2) / 5) ≈ 968.294

Calculate the correlation coefficient (r):

r = ((171 - 272.8) * (941 - 1581.8) + (397 - 272.8) * (3093 - 1581.8) + (270 - 272.8) * (2003 - 1581.8) + (88 - 272.8) * (433 - 1581.8) + (438 - 272.8) * (3019 - 1581.8)) / (5 * 131.150 * 968.294)

r ≈ -0.398

Rounding to three decimal places, the correlation coefficient between cost and miles is approximately -0.398.

After performing the calculations, we find that the correlation coefficient between cost and miles is approximately -0.398. This means that there is a weak negative correlation between the cost of flights and the distance in miles. In other words, as the distance increases, the cost tends to slightly decrease.

Learn more about Costs

at brainly.com/question/31259207

#SPJ11

The equation of the plane passing through the point (1,5,4) is 23y - z = 111

Given data ,

To find the equation of the plane passing through the point (1, 5, 4) and perpendicular to the line x = 1 + 7t, y = t, z = 23t, we can use the following approach:

To find the direction vector of the line, which is the coefficients of t in each coordinate. In this case, the direction vector is (7, 1, 23).

Since the plane is perpendicular to the line, the normal vector of the plane will be orthogonal to the direction vector. We can take the direction vector and find two other vectors that are orthogonal to it to determine the normal vector.

The two orthogonal vectors to (7, 1, 23) is to take the cross product of (7, 1, 23) with two arbitrary vectors that are not parallel to each other. Let's choose the vectors (1, 0, 0) and (0, 1, 0).

Cross product 1: (7, 1, 23) x (1, 0, 0)

= (0, 23, -1)

Cross product 2: (7, 1, 23) x (0, 1, 0)

= (-23, 0, -7)

So, the two vectors that are orthogonal to the direction vector (7, 1, 23).

Now, the equation of the plane using the normal vector and the given point (1, 5, 4).

The equation of the plane is given by the dot product of the normal vector and the vector connecting the given point to any point (x, y, z) lying on the plane:

(0, 23, -1) · (x - 1, y - 5, z - 4) = 0

Expanding the dot product, we have:

0(x - 1) + 23(y - 5) + (-1)(z - 4) = 0

23(y - 5) - (z - 4) = 0

Hence , the equation of the plane passing through the point (1, 5, 4) and perpendicular to the line x = 1 + 7t, y = t, z = 23t is 23y - z = 111.

To learn more about equation of plane click :

https://brainly.com/question/32163454

#SPJ4

The complete question is attached below:

Find the equation of the plane which passes through the point (1,5,4) and is perpendicular to the line x=1+7t, y=t, z=23t

Answer: The mid-point of the given line segment is (4,2,10).

Step-by-step explanation: We can find the mid-point of the line segment given to us by using the formula:

x=[tex]\frac{x_{1}+x_{2} }2}[/tex]

y=[tex]\frac{y_{1}+y_{2}}{2}[/tex]

z=[tex]\frac{z_{1}+z_{2}}{2}[/tex]

where x,y, and z are the coordinates of the mid-point of the line segment.

Now, [tex]{x_{1}[/tex]=2,[tex]{x_{2}[/tex]=6,[tex]{y_{1}[/tex]=0,[tex]{y_{2}[/tex]=4,[tex]{z_{1}[/tex]=-6,[tex]{z_{2}[/tex]=26

By substituting the values in the above formula we get,

x=(2+6)/2=4

y=(0+4)/2=2

z=(-6+26)/2=10

Thus, the mid-point of the given line segment is: (4,2,10)

To learn more about coordinate systems:

https://brainly.ph/question/5853904

The probability that the sum of the throw is divisible by 4 but greater than 7 is 17 / 36.

There are 36 possible outcomes when two dice are tossed.

The sum of the dice can be any number from 2 to 12. The sum is divisible by 4 when the sum is 4, 8, or 12. The sum is greater than 7 when the sum is 8 , 9 , 10 , 11, or 12.

There are 3 ways to get a sum of 4, 3 ways to get a sum of 8, 2 ways to get a sum of 12, 4 ways to get a sum of 9, 4 ways to get a sum of 10, and 1 way to get a sum of 11.

The probability of getting a sum that is divisible by 4 or greater than 7 is:

= ( 3 + 3 + 2 + 4 + 4 + 1 ) / 36

= 17 / 36

Find out more on probability at https://brainly.com/question/23955312

#SPJ1

The value of d is 8 units.

Given is a setup of a circular wheel with radius AC of 5 units and a tangent AB of 12 units, we need to find the value of d,

We know that the tangents are perpendicular to the circle,

So, ΔCAB is a right triangle, using the Pythagoras theorem,

BC² = AB² + AC²

BC² = 5² + 12²

BC² = 169

BC = 13

d = 13-5

d = 8

Hence the value of d is 8 units.

Learn more about tangent click;

https://brainly.com/question/30951227

#SPJ1

To calculate the limits below, we can use basic limit rules and arithmetic operations.

lim_(x->2) [f(x) + g(x)]

= lim_(x->2) f(x) + lim_(x->2) g(x) (by limit laws)

= 1 + (-4)

= -3

We can use the limit laws to add the limits of f(x) and g(x) since they are both approaching the same point, 2. Then, we can simply add the values of the limits to get the limit of their sum.

lim_(x->2) [g(x) - f(x)h(x)]

= lim_(x->2) g(x) - lim_(x->2) [f(x)h(x)] (by limit laws)

= -4 - [lim_(x->2) f(x)] [lim_(x->2) h(x)] (by limit laws and arithmetic operations)

= -4 - 1(0)

= -4



Again, we can use the limit laws to subtract the limit of f(x) multiplied by h(x) from the limit of g(x). To find the limit of f(x) multiplied by h(x), we can use the product rule for limits and multiply the limits of f(x) and h(x) together.

lim_(x->2) [g(x)/f(x)]

= [lim_(x->2) g(x)] / [lim_(x->2) f(x)] (by limit laws)

= -4 / 1

= -4



We can use the limit laws to divide the limit of g(x) by the limit of f(x) since they are both approaching the same point, 2.



The limits of [f(x) + g(x)], [g(x) - f(x)h(x)], and [g(x)/f(x)] as x approaches 2 are -3, -4, and -4, respectively.

To know more about divide visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/15381501

#SPJ11

The local extrema points of the function f(x,y) = 2x³ + xy² + 5x² + y² are (0, 0) and (-5/3, 0). Saddle points are (-1, 2) and (-1, -2).

The given function is :

f(x,y) = 2x³ + xy² + 5x² + y²

[tex]f_x(x,y)[/tex] = 6x² + y² + 10x

[tex]f_y(x,y)[/tex] = 2xy +2y

Let both the partial derivatives equal 0.

6x² + y² + 10x = 0

and

2xy +2y = 0

⇒ y(x + 1) = 0

⇒ y = 0 and x = -1

Substitute x = -1 into the equation of 6x² + y² + 10x = 0.

6(-1)² + y² + 10(-1) = 0

-4 + y² = 0

y = +2 or -2

Substitute y = 0 into the equation of 6x² + y² + 10x = 0.

equation of 6x² + 10x = 0.

6x = -10

x = -5/3 or x = 0

So the critical points are :

(-1, 2), (-1, -2), (0, 0) and (-5/3, 0).

[tex]f_{xx}(x,y)[/tex] = 12x + 10

[tex]f_{yy}(x,y)[/tex] = 2x + 2

[tex]f_{xy}(x,y)[/tex] = 2y

Now,

D = [tex]f_{xx}(x,y)f_{yy}(x,y)-[f_{xy}(x,y)]^2[/tex]

So at (0, 0) :

D > 0 and [tex]f_{xx}[/tex] > 0, so it is a local minimum point.

At (-5/3, 0) :

D > 0 and [tex]f_{xx}[/tex] < 0, so it is a local maximum point.

At (-1, 2) :

D < 0 and it is saddle point.

At (-1, -2) :

D < 0 and it is saddle point.

Learn more about Saddle Points here :

https://brainly.com/question/11013588

#SPJ4

If deviations are positive, it means that the observations are above the mean. This is option 1.

Positive deviations indicate that the individual observations are greater than the mean of the dataset. Deviation is a measure of how far each observation deviates from the mean. When the deviations are positive, it implies that the observations are higher than the average or central value represented by the mean.

Linear regression is a statistical technique used to model the relationship between variables. It is not directly related to the sign of deviations. Therefore, option 2 is incorrect.

Option 3, which states that positive deviations indicate that observations are below the mean, is incorrect. Positive deviations indicate observations above the mean, not below.

Option 4, stating that SSE (Sum of Squared Errors) will be negative, is not necessarily true. SSE is a measure of the discrepancy between the observed values and the values predicted by a regression model. It is calculated by summing the squared differences between the observed and predicted values. The SSE can be positive or zero, but it cannot be negative.

In summary, when deviations are positive, it indicates that the observations are above the mean, not below. The statement that SSE will be negative is incorrect.

To learn more about Linear regression : brainly.com/question/13328200

#SPJ11

The predicted y value for each of the following x scores are:

To find the predicted y value (y) for each of the given x score using the regression equation y = 2x - 7, we substitute the x values into the equation and calculate the corresponding y values.

For x = 0:

y = 2(0) - 7

= -7

The predicted y value for x = 0 is -7.

For x = 1:

y = 2(1) - 7

= -5

The predicted y value for x = 1 is -5.

For x = 3:

y = 2(3) - 7

= -1

The predicted y value for x = 3 is -1.

For x = -2:

y = 2(-2) - 7

= -11

The predicted y value for x = -2 is -11.

So, the predicted y values for the given x scores are:

For x = 0, y = -7

For x = 1, y = -5

For x = 3, y = -1

For x = -2, y = -11

Learn more about regression equation at https://brainly.com/question/13168714

#SPJ11

The factored form of the quadratic equation 4x²+ 100x + 255 = 0 is (2x + 17)(2x + 15) = 0.

We have the equation:

4x² + 100x + 255 = 0

Now, factorizing

4x² + 34x + 30x + 255 = 0

Now, we group the terms and factor by grouping:

(4x² + 34x) + (30x + 255) = 0

2x(2x + 17) + 15(2x + 17) = 0

(2x + 17)(2x + 15) = 0

Now, we set each factor equal to zero and solve for x:

2x + 17 = 0 --> 2x = -17 --> x = -17/2

2x + 15 = 0 --> 2x = -15 --> x = -15/2

The factored form of the quadratic equation 4x²+ 100x + 255 = 0 is (2x + 17)(2x + 15) = 0 and the solutions for x are x = -17/2 and x = -15/2.

Learn more about Equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

a. The values of a and b are;

b.ff(x) = x implies x² - x - 2 = 0.

To find the value of a and b, we use the given information to form two equations in a and b:

f(b) = b gives b/(b-a) = b,

a = b/2

f(2a) = 2a gives (b/(2a-a)) = 2a

b = 4a²

To show that ff(x) = x implies x² - x - 2 = 0, we substitute ff(x) into the equation:

ff(x) = x

f(f(x)) = x

f(b/(x-a)) = x

b/(b/(x-a)-a) = x

b(x-a)/(b-(x-a)a) = x

bx - ba = bx - x² + a²x - a²a

x² - x - 2 = 0

Learn more about functions at: https://brainly.com/question/17043948

#SPJ1

The given sequent "((P-Q) & (RS)) ⊢ =(P&R) Qvs" is proved.

To prove the sequent ((P-Q) & (RS)) ⊢ =(P&R) Qvs, we will use natural deduction rules.

1. Assume ((P-Q) & (RS)) as the premise.

2. From (1), apply the ∧-elimination rule to get (P-Q).

3. From (1), apply the ∧-elimination rule to get (RS).

4. Assume P as a sub-derivation.

5. From (4), apply the →-intro rule to get (P→R).

6. From (5) and (2), apply the →-Elim rule to get R.

7. From (6), apply the ∧-intro rule to get (P&R).

8. Assume Q as a sub-derivation.

9. From (9) and (3), apply the →-intro rule to get (Q→S).

10. From (10) and (2), apply the →-Elim rule to get S.

11. From (11), apply the ∨-intro rule to get (Qvs).

12. From (7) and (12), apply the =-intro rule to get =(P&R) Qvs.

13. Discharge the assumptions made in steps 4 and 8.

14. Finally, discharge the assumption made in step 1.

Therefore, we have proven the sequent ((P-Q) & (RS)) ⊢ =(P&R) Qvs.

To know more about sequent refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31967799#

#SPJ11

The frequency distribution of Charlotte's root causes of tardiness is as follows:20 times for talking to her rival roommates for too long10 times for eating her breakfast or lunch for too long25 times for waking up too late45 times for spending too much time with her crush.

The total number of times Charlotte was late is:

20 + 10 + 25 + 45 = 100.

To estimate the probability of Charlotte arriving late due to talking to her rival roommates for too long, divide the number of times she was late due to this cause by the total number of times she was late.

P(Talking too long) = Number of times talking too long/ Total number of times

she was late P(Talking too long) = 20/100P(Talking too long) = 0.2

Therefore, the main answer is 0.20.

To know more about roommates visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/13522425

#SPJ11