Let f(x)=1/4x^3+x−1 . What is the value of (f−1)′(x) when x = 3?

To find the length of a line segment in a circle, use the formula [tex]d = 2r[/tex] [tex]sin(t/2)[/tex] , where r is the radius of the circle and t is the angle between the radii. The length of segment DE is  [tex]5[/tex] units.

We can use the similar triangles property to find the missing length of segment DE in the given figure. Because triangles ABD and CBE are similar, we can use a proportion to find the length of DE:

[tex]CB/BE = AB/BD[/tex]

With the given values, we get:

[tex]3/6 = 5/(5 + DE)[/tex]

When we simplify and solve for DE, we get:

[tex]3(5 + DE) = 6 * 5 \s15 + 3DE = 30[/tex]

[tex]3DE = 15 \sDE = 5[/tex]

Therefore, segment DE has a length of 5 units.

Learn more about circle here:

https://brainly.com/question/28612561

#SPJ1

Answer:

28x + 40

Step-by-step explanation:

Since all four sides of a square are equal, we can make an equation:

[tex]4(7x + 10) = 28x + 40[/tex]

The simulation suggests that the chef's estimation of 30% broccoli soup orders is reasonable, but actual orders will vary from one set of customers to the next.

The chef's estimation of 30% broccoli soup orders seems reasonable based on the probabilities given, but the actual number of broccoli soup orders will likely vary from one set of 10 customers to the next. To estimate the accuracy of the chef's estimation, she conducts a simulation by shuffling cards representing the soup choices and randomly selecting one for each of the 10 customers. She repeats this process five times.

Based on the simulation results, we can see that the actual number of broccoli soup orders varies quite a bit from the expected value of 1.5. However, this is to be expected due to the random nature of the simulation.

To further estimate the accuracy of the chef's estimation, we could calculate the mean and standard deviation of the results to get a better sense of the distribution of possible outcomes.

Overall, the simulation suggests that the chef's estimation of 30% broccoli soup orders is a reasonable estimate, but the actual number of broccoli soup orders will likely vary from one set of 10 customers to the next.

To learn more about estimation please click on below link        

https://brainly.com/question/30982574

#SPJ1

Answer: A prime number is a positive integer greater than 1 that has no positive integer divisors other than 1 and itself. In other words, a prime number is a number that is only divisible by 1 and itself.

Step-by-step explanation:

For example, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, and so on, are prime numbers because they can only be divided by 1 and themselves without any remainder.

However, 4 is not a prime number because it can be divided by 1, 2, and 4, and 6 is not a prime number because it can be divided by 1, 2, 3, and 6.

Answer:

A prime number is a number that can be multiplied by one and itself~
eg- 2,3,5,7,11
Let me know if this helps

Answer:i don't know the answer

Step-by-step explanation: i don't konw

(a) The value of sin 2θ is -3√(91)/50.

(b)  θ/2 is located in the third quadrant.

(c) The value of cos θ/2 is -√65/10.

We know that cos θ = 3/10, so we can find sin θ using the Pythagorean identity:

sin² θ + cos² θ = 1

sin²θ + (3/10)² = 1

sin²θ = 1 - (3/10)² = 91/100

sin θ = ±√(91)/10

Since 3π/2 < θ < 2π,

we know that sin θ < 0, so sin θ = -√(91)/10.

a) To find sin 2θ, we can use the double angle formula:

sin 2θ = 2 sin θ cos θ

sin 2θ = 2 (-√(91)/10) (3/10)

sin 2θ = -3√(91)/50

b) To find the quadrant in which θ/2 is located, we first need to find θ/2:

θ/2 = (3π/2 + 2π)/2 = 5π/4

5π/4 is in the third quadrant, so θ/2 is located in the third quadrant.

c) To find cos θ/2, we can use the half angle formula:

cos θ/2 = ±√((1 + cos θ)/2)

Since 3π/2 < θ < 2π, we know that cos θ < 0, so we take the negative square root:

cos θ/2 = -√((1 + 3/10)/2)

cos θ/2 = -√(13/20)

Simplifying the radical by dividing both numerator and denominator by 4:

cos θ/2 = -√(13)/2√5

Multiplying numerator and denominator by √5 to rationalize the denominator:

cos θ/2 = -√65/10

Learn more about quadrant here: https://brainly.com/question/25038683

#SPJ1

The zeros of the function H(x) = (3x - 4)(x + 2)^2(x - 5) are (4/3, 0), (-2, 0), and (5, 0).

To find the zeros of the function H(x), we need to find the values of x that make the function equal to zero.

H(x) = (3x - 4)(x + 2)^2(x - 5)

Setting H(x) equal to zero, we have:

(3x - 4)(x + 2)^2(x - 5) = 0

Using the zero product property, we can see that H(x) will be equal to zero when any of the factors are equal to zero.

So, the zeros of the function H(x) are:

3x - 4 = 0, which gives x = 4/3

x + 2 = 0, which gives x = -2

x - 5 = 0, which gives x = 5

Therefore, the zeros of the function H(x) are (4/3, 0), (-2, 0), and (5, 0).

Read more about polynomial at

https://brainly.com/question/7693326

#SPJ1

Answer:

The probability of winning second prize in a 5/45 lottery is 1 in 8,145. This is calculated by taking the total number of possible combinations (8,145) and dividing it by the total number of possible outcomes (1).

Step-by-step explanation:

The minimum weight for shelter A is not provided in the given information, but we can compare the minimum weight of shelter B with shelter A's box plot.

As per the given information, the whisker of shelter A ranges from 8 to 30, which means the minimum weight in shelter A is 8 pounds. On the other hand, the whisker of shelter B ranges from 10 to 28, which means the minimum weight in shelter B is 10 pounds. Therefore, shelter A has the dog that weighs the least.

Answer:

Your answer is correct, it's shelter A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find the number of teenagers in the group, given that the product of their ages is 18,727,200.

To solve this problem, we need to factorize the given number into its prime factors and then determine how many distinct factors there are.

18,727,200 can be factorized as:

18,727,200 = 2^6 × 3^2 × 5^2 × 13^2

To find the number of distinct factors, we add 1 to each exponent and then multiply them together:

(6+1) × (2+1) × (2+1) × (2+1) = 7 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 189

Therefore, there are 189 factors of 18,727,200, which means that there are 189 ways to multiply whole numbers together to get this number.

Since we want to find the number of teenagers in the group, we need to look for combinations of factors that result in whole numbers for the ages. We can start by dividing the total number of factors by 2 (since we are looking for pairs of factors) and then slowly increase the divisor until we find the smallest number that results in a whole number.

189 ÷ 2 = 94.5 (not a whole number)

189 ÷ 3 = 63 (not a whole number)

189 ÷ 4 = 47.25 (not a whole number)

189 ÷ 5 = 37.8 (not a whole number)

189 ÷ 6 = 31.5 (not a whole number)

189 ÷ 7 = 27 (a whole number)

Therefore, there are 27 pairs of factors that result in whole numbers for the ages. Each pair corresponds to a group of teenagers, and since each group has the same number of teenagers, there are 27 teenagers in the group.

Answer:

1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate unadjusted cost of goods sold, sum the beginning inventory value and the cost of goods manufactured, then subtract the ending inventory value.

The data set that has the largest range is C. 5, 6, 75, which is calculated as 75 - 5 = 70.

To find the largest range, we need to calculate the difference between the highest and lowest value in each data set and compare them.

A. For 14, 19, 18, 35, 32, 38, 40, we have:

Range = 40 - 14 = 26

B. For 102, 105, 103, 110, we have:

Range = 110 - 102 = 8

C. For 5, 6, 75, we have:

Range = 75 - 5 = 70

D. For 1, 9, 2, 5, 4, 19, 2, 4, 3, we have:

Range = 19 - 1 = 18

Therefore, data set C has the largest range of 70.

Learn more about the range on:

https://brainly.com/question/27206337

#SPJ1

Answer:

3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 is larger because since they have the same denominator (the bottom value), you compare the numerators (the top value). Whichever numerator is bigger gives you the larger fraction.

Answer: 3/4 is larger, this is simply because 3/4 is = 75%

whereas 1/4 = 25%

Answer:

Second option [tex]y=\text{log}(2\text{x})+3[/tex]

Solution:

Based on the family of graphs shown in the attached file, the equation could represent the graph is [tex]y=\text{log}(2\text{x})+3[/tex]

This graph is the graph of the function [tex]y=\text{log}(\text{x})[/tex] stretched horizontally by a factor of 2 and translated 3 units upward.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Edge 2023

On solving the provided question, we can say that - the value of the simple interest will be $ 881.28.

Multiplying the principal by the interest rate, time, and other factors yields simple interest. Simple return equals principle times interest times hours is the marketed formula. It is easiest to compute interest using this formula. A percentage of the principle balance is how interest is most commonly computed. The interest rate on the loan is known as this percentage.

here,

we have

P = 1360;

R = 5.4 ;

T = 12

so, we get,

SI = 1360 X 5.4 X 12 /100

SI =88128/100

= 881.28

Hence, On solving the provided question, we can say that - the value of the simple interest will be $ 881.28.

To know more about simple interest visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25845758

#SPJ9

Substituting for x in an expression means replacing the variable x with a specific value or expression. This is often done to evaluate the expression for that particular value or to simplify the expression.

Substituting 2 for x in the first expression, we get:

[tex]1/2(2) + 4(2) + 6 - 1/2(2) - 2 = 1 + 8 + 6 - 1 - 2 = 12[/tex]

Substituting 2 for x in the second expression, we get:

[tex]2(2) + 2 - 1 = 5[/tex]

One expression equals 5 when substituting 2 for x, and the other equals 2 because the expressions are not equivalent.

Therefore, the first expression evaluated with x = 2 is 12, and the second expression evaluated with x = 2 is 5. Since they do not have the same value, the correct option is:

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete. The complete question is given below:

What will be the result of substituting 2 for x in both expressions below? One-half x + 4 x + 6 minus one-half x minus 2 Both expressions equal 5 when substituting 2 for x because the expressions are equivalent. Both expressions equal 6 when substituting 2 for x because the expressions are equivalent. One expression equals 5 when substituting 2 for x, and the other equals 2 because the expressions are not equivalent. One expression equals 6 when substituting 2 for x, and the other equals 2 because the expressions are not equivalent.

The Answer for the given functions are:

i) f(-3) = -14.

ii) g[f(0)] = -16.

iii) f[h(2)] = 13.

iv)  hᴏf(x) = 3x - 1.

v)  h-1(1) = -3.

Functiοn nοtatiοn is a way οf representing a functiοn using algebraic symbοls. It is a shοrthand way οf expressing a relatiοnship between twο quantities οr variables, where οne variable depends οn the οther.

i) Tο find f(-3), we substitute x = -3 in the expressiοn fοr f(x) and simplify:

f(-3) = 3(-3) - 5 = -9 - 5 = -14

Therefοre, f(-3) = -14.

ii) Tο find g[f(0)], we first evaluate f(0) and then substitute that value intο g(x):

f(0) = 3(0) - 5 = -5

g[f(0)] = g(-5) = 2(-5) - 6 = -10 - 6 = -16

Therefοre, g[f(0)] = -16.

iii) Tο find f[h(2)], we first evaluate h(2) and then substitute that value intο f(x):

h(2) = 2 + 4 = 6

f[h(2)] = f(6) = 3(6) - 5 = 18 - 5 = 13

Therefοre, f[h(2)] = 13.

iv) Tο find hᴏf(x), we substitute f(x) intο the expressiοn fοr h(x) and simplify:

hᴏf(x) = h[f(x)] = f(x) + 4 = (3x - 5) + 4 = 3x - 1

Therefοre, hᴏf(x) = 3x - 1.

v) Tο find h-1(1), we need tο sοlve fοr x in the equatiοn h(x) = 1:

h(x) = x + 4 = 1

Subtracting 4 frοm bοth sides, we get:

x = 1 - 4 = -3

Therefοre, h-1(1) = -3.

To learn more about function notation, Visit

https://brainly.com/question/27915724

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the utility-maximizing bundle of goods, we need to solve for the values of x and y that maximize U while still satisfying the budget constraint. The budget constraint can be written as:

2x + 4y = 24

or

x + 2y = 12

We can use the method of Lagrange multipliers to solve for the utility-maximizing values of x and y subject to this constraint. The Lagrangian function is:

L = 3x^(2/3)y^(-1/3) + λ(x + 2y - 12)

Taking partial derivatives with respect to x, y, and λ, we get:

dL/dx = 2x^(-1/3)y^(-1/3) + λ = 0

dL/dy = -x^(2/3)y^(-4/3) + 2λ = 0

dL/dλ = x + 2y - 12 = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously, we get:

x = 6

y = 3

So the utility-maximizing bundle is 6 units of x and 3 units of y.

To see if the individual is better off with the government intervention, we can plot the budget line and the indifference curve for the utility-maximizing bundle with and without the limit on x.

Without the limit, the budget line is the same as before (x + 2y = 12), and the indifference curve for the utility-maximizing bundle passes through the point (6, 3) on the graph.

With the limit, the budget line becomes x = 4, since the individual is prohibited from purchasing more than 4 units of x. The corresponding budget line has a slope of -1/2 and intercepts the y-axis at 6.

If we draw the indifference curve for the utility-maximizing bundle of (4,4), which lies on the budget line, we can see that the individual is not better off with the government intervention. This is because the slope of the budget line under the intervention is steeper, so the individual would have to give up more y than x to afford the same amount of utility. Thus, the individual would have to move to a lower indifference curve with lower utility.

Therefore, the individual is not better off with the government intervention.

Answer:

53 in2 is the answer for this question

Answer:

53

Step-by-step explanation:

If you divide the figure into two parts by extending the 4 in side, you get a right triangle and a rectangle.

Area of rectangle:

6*8 = 48 in²

Area of triangle:

1/2*(13 - 8)*(6 - 4) = 1/2 times 5 times 2 = 5 in²

Total area is:

48 + 5 = 53 in²

hope this helps x

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this problem, we can use the formula for calculating the fixed monthly payment on a mortgage:

P = (r * PV) / (1 - (1 + r)^(-n))

where:

P = fixed monthly payment

r = monthly interest rate (annual interest rate divided by 12)

PV = present value of the loan (loan amount)

n = total number of payments (number of years multiplied by 12)

Using the given values:

r = 0.0735 / 12 = 0.006125

PV = R150,000

n = 20 x 12 = 240

Then we can calculate the monthly payment:

P = (0.006125 * 150000) / (1 - (1 + 0.006125)^(-240)) = R1,181.91

This means that Gideon will have to pay R1,181.91 every month for 20 years to repay his loan.

To determine how much of the second payment applies to the principal balance, we need to calculate the interest and principal amounts of the first payment.

For the first payment, the interest can be calculated as:

interest1 = r * PV = 0.006125 * 150000 = R918.75

This means that the first payment consists of R918.75 in interest and the rest, R1,181.91 - R918.75 = R263.16 is principal.

To find out how much of the second payment applies to the principal balance, we need to subtract the interest and add the calculated principal amount from the first payment to the amount of the second payment:

principal2 = (P - interest1) + principal1 = (1181.91 - 918.75) + 263.16 = R525.32

Therefore, R525.32 of the second payment applies to the principal balance.

Answer:

The temperature on the eighth day is 80.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let t = temperature on the eighth day.

[tex] \frac{71 + 80 + 69 + 80 + 73 +77+ 70 + t}{8} = 75[/tex]

[tex] \frac{520 + t}{8} = 75[/tex]

[tex]520 + t = 600[/tex]

[tex]t = 80[/tex]

So the Greatest Common Factor of The given expressions is -63x²y, 9x³y³, and 90x³y is 9x²y.

In mathematics, an expression is a combination of numbers, variables, and operators (such as +, -, ×, ÷, etc.) that represents a value or a quantity. Expressions can be simple or complex, and they can involve arithmetic operations, functions, and algebraic operations. Expressions can be evaluated, simplified, or manipulated using mathematical rules and techniques. They are used in many areas of mathematics, including algebra, calculus, and geometry, as well as in other fields such as physics, engineering, and economics.

Here,

To find the greatest common factor (GCF) of the given terms, we need to factor out any common factors of the coefficients and variables.

-63x²y = (-1) × 3² × 7 × x² × y

9x³y³ = 3² × x³ × y³

90x³y = 2 × 3² × 5 × x² × y

The common factors among these terms are 3², x², and y. Therefore, the GCF of the given terms is:

GCF = 3² × x² × y

= 9x²y

To know more about expression,

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ1

The answer of given Theoretical  Probability Question is  0.1379 , 0.125

Experimental probability of the name Fred being chosen = number of times Fred is chosen / total number of trials

= 17/124

= 0.1379 (rounded to four decimal places)

Theoretical probability of the name Fred being chosen = number of outcomes in which Fred is chosen / total number of possible outcomes

Since there are eight different names in the hat, the total number of possible outcomes is 8. The number of outcomes in which Fred is chosen is 1 (since there is only one Fred in the hat).

Therefore, the theoretical probability of Fred being chosen is:

1/8 = 0.125 (rounded to three decimal places)

If the number of names in the hat were different, both the experimental and theoretical probabilities would change.

To Know more about Probability visit :

https://brainly.com/question/31279414

#SPJ9

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming that the original measurement is in millimeters, since they are commonly used in precision applications, we know that 1 millimeter is equal to 0.03937 inches. Therefore, we can convert 4559.886 millimeters to inches by multiplying by 0.03937:

4559.886 mm * 0.03937 in/mm = 179.72467632 in (rounded to 8 decimal places)

To round this to the nearest inch, we need to look at the first decimal place after the decimal point. In this case, the digit in the first decimal place is 7, which is greater than or equal to 5. Therefore, we round up to the nearest inch, which gives us:

179.72467632 in rounded to the nearest inch is 180 in.

Therefore, 4559.886 rounded to the nearest inch is 180.

Answer:

Is the problem -3/4 + 1/2 or 3/4 + 1/2?

I'll just do both then.

-3/4 + 1/2 = -1/4

3/4 + 1/2 = 5/4 or 1 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

You're welcome.

Answer:

[tex] \frac{3}{4 } + \frac{1}{2} [/tex]

take lcm of denominators i.e. 4and 2

so, the lcm of 4 and 2 is 4.

[tex] \frac{3}{4} + \frac{2}{4} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{3 + 2}{4} [/tex]

[tex] \frac{5}{4} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this will be helpful:)

Answer:

Let's call the speed of Bug F v_F and the speed of Bug S v_S. Since both bugs started at 0, we can express their positions at any time t as:

Position of Bug F = 12 + v_F * t

Position of Bug S = 8 + v_S * t

To find out when F and S will be 100 units apart, we need to find the time t at which their positions differ by 100 units. In other words, we need to solve the following equation:

|12 + v_F * t - (8 + v_S * t)| = 100

We can simplify this equation by expanding the absolute value and rearranging the terms:

|4 + (v_F - v_S) * t| = 100

Now we can split this equation into two cases:

Case 1: 4 + (v_F - v_S) * t = 100

In this case, we have:

v_F - v_S > 0 (since Bug F is faster)

t = (100 - 4) / (v_F - v_S)

Case 2: 4 + (v_F - v_S) * t = -100

In this case, we have:

v_F - v_S < 0 (since Bug S is faster)

t = (-100 - 4) / (v_F - v_S)

Since we're only interested in positive values of t, we can discard the second case. Therefore, the time at which F and S will be 100 units apart is:

t = (100 - 4) / (v_F - v_S)

t = 96 / (v_F - v_S)

We don't know the values of v_F and v_S, but we can use the fact that Bug F is at 12 and Bug S is at 8, four seconds after they started. This gives us two equations:

12 = 4v_F + 0v_S

8 = 4v_S + 0v_F

Solving these equations for v_F and v_S, we get:

v_F = 3

v_S = 2

Substituting these values into the equation for t, we get:

t = 96 / (3 - 2)

t = 96

Therefore, F and S will be 100 units apart 96 seconds after they start.