Land ownership and control were not the primary motivations for World War I, which was instead driven by complicated factors including nationalism, militarism, and alliances.
For children, what is World War One?World War I, sometimes known as the Great War, lasted from 1914 to 1918. It was mostly fought in Europe, but it also stretched to the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. It is sometimes referred to as the Great War or the First World War.
What factors led to World War I, according to the essay?In certain European countries in the years preceding World War 1, militarism was the most effective form of force to employ. Militarization had an impact on culture, the media, and public opinion in addition to legislation.
To know more about World War I visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ9
match the following items. match the items in the left column to the items in the right column. 1.the reconversion of people back to catholicism iconoclasm 2.wealth; riches friars 3.the attacking of cherished beliefs or traditional institutions regardless whether based on error or superstition counter reformation 4.supreme power or authority peonage 5.a member of certain religious orders of the roman catholic church sovereignty 6.the condition or service of a person doing work that requires little skill opulence
The terms discussed above are diverse in nature and relate to various aspects of society, history, and culture. Iconoclasm and Friars are associated with religion, while the Counter Reformation aimed to reform the Roman Catholic Church. Sovereignty and Peonage are related to political and economic systems, respectively, while Opulence pertains to wealth and luxurious living. Understanding these terms and their meanings can provide insights into different aspects of human society and history.
Matches of the following items are:
1. Iconoclasm – attacking of cherished beliefs or traditional institutions regardless whether based on error or superstition
2. Friars – a member of certain religious orders of the Roman Catholic Church
3. Counter Reformation – the reconversion of people back to Catholicism
4. Sovereignty – supreme power or authority
5. Peonage – the condition or service of a person doing work that requires little skill
6. Opulence – wealth; riches
For more question on Roman Catholic Church click on
https://brainly.com/question/14556187
#SPJ11
During the late-1940s and early-1950s, the term McCarthyism was used to mean what? (4 points)investigation of financial transactions to avoid taxesinvestigation of subversion at the highest levels of governmentlegislation that focused on domestic rather than foreign policyaccusation of disloyalty with little or no evidence
During the late-1940s and early-1950s, the term McCarthyism was used to mean "the accusation of disloyalty with little or no evidence."
McCarthyism is a term used to refer to the practice of accusing people of treason or subversion without sufficient evidence. The term originated in the United States during the late 1940s and early 1950s.McCarthyism was a dark period in US history in which many individuals, mostly government officials and intellectuals, were investigated and charged with being communist sympathizers or traitors to their country.
Joseph McCarthy, a US senator from Wisconsin, is often associated with this period of witch hunts and fear-mongering. The accusations were made without proper evidence and often ruined people's careers and reputations. This led to a culture of fear and suspicion in American society, with people being afraid to speak out for fear of being labeled a communist or a traitor.
While McCarthyism eventually fell out of favor, it left a lasting impact on American society. It highlighted the importance of protecting civil liberties and the rule of law, even in times of national security crises. It also demonstrated the danger of political extremism and the need for rational and evidence-based policies.
For more about McCarthyism:
https://brainly.com/question/3283958
#SPJ11
Chests of tea were tossed into the Boston Harbor. True False
Answer:
True. It self-explanatory, BOSTON TEA PARTY.
Why did the colonists dump the tea into the Boston Harbor?
It’s complicated, but basically the British government gave a tax concession to the British East India (BEI) company, letting it sell tea to the American colonies at a reduced price. The same concession was not given to American tea importers, who now couldn’t compete with the BEI’s prices.
That was grating enough (imagine if the government passed a law that put you out of business in order to give a big ‘foreign’ company an advantage), but the one tax that remained on BEI tea was the Townsend tax. The purpose of this tax was to pay the salaries of British officials in the colonies. Previously these officials had been paid directly by the colonies, but the British government wanted to make those officials dependent on them for their wages to insure their loyalty.
And all of this was done without the colonists having any say in the matter. Thus ‘no taxation without representation.’ They were furious that the British government was passing such laws on them without giving them any say in the matter.
the primary reason that president warren g. harding was willing to seize the initiative on the issue of international disarmament was that
The primary reason why President Warren G. Harding was willing to seize the initiative on the issue of international disarmament was that he saw it as a means to establish the United States as a world leader.
Disarmament is the process of reducing or eliminating military weapons and equipment that are used in war or combat. It is a multilateral process that involves several countries and often includes the exchange of information and technology, as well as diplomatic negotiations and agreements.
The aim of disarmament is to create a more peaceful world and to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction by rogue states and terrorist groups.
The purpose of the 1921-22 Washington Naval Conference was to establish a framework for disarmament and arms limitation in the Pacific region. The conference was initiated by President Warren G. Harding, who saw it as a means to establish the United States as a world leader and to promote peace and stability in the region.
The conference resulted in the signing of several agreements, including the Four-Power Treaty, the Five-Power Treaty, and the Nine-Power Treaty, which set limits on naval armaments and established guidelines for international diplomacy and trade.
To know more about Disarmament here:
https://brainly.com/question/29766422#
#SPJ11
which country was most responsible for the change in us foreign policy at the end the the 18th century
The United States foreign policy changed significantly at the end of the 18th century due to the involvement of France.
The French Revolution led to the outbreak of the French Revolutionary Wars in 1792, which changed the balance of power in Europe and led to the end of French dominance. This had a major impact on the United States as they sought to maintain neutrality while simultaneously trying to trade with both France and Britain.
The situation further deteriorated when France declared war on Britain in 1793, leading to the US being drawn into the conflict. Ultimately, it was France that was responsible for the change in US foreign policy at the end of the 18th century.
To know more about foreign policy click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29822820#
#SPJ11
which development in the 1950s made the ideal of the nuclear family attainable for a large fraction of the u.s. population?
Answer: a sharp rise in inflation-adjusted wages
Your report should consist of three concise
paragraphs that use information from the primary
sources and that:
1. describe Hitler.
2. assess his character.
3. make recommendations to the United States
about how to respond to Hitler in the future.
The report about Hitler is as follows: Hitler was a German politician and leader of the Nazi Party, rising to power as Chancellor in 1933 and later becoming the Führer in 1934.
What is the report about?Hitler was born in Austria and served in the German Army during World War I. Hitler was known for his extreme nationalist, racist, and anti-Semitic views. He believed in the superiority of the Aryan race and sought to expand German territory and influence through military conquest.
Hitler's character was marked by his unwavering commitment to his ideology, his ruthless ambition, and his willingness to use violence to achieve his goals. He was charismatic and skilled at public speaking, able to rally his supporters with fiery speeches. However, he was also paranoid, cruel, and prone to irrational decision-making. He saw himself as a genius and often disregarded the advice of his advisors.
To respond to Hitler in the future, the United States should take a firm stance against his aggressive actions and expansionist policies. The U.S. should work with its allies to contain German aggression and prevent further military conquests. Diplomacy should be used where possible, but the U.S. should be prepared to use military force if necessary to protect the interests of its allies and ensure global stability. Also, efforts should be made to counter Hitler's propaganda and discredit his extremist ideology.
Learn more about Hitler at:
https://brainly.com/question/12778492
#SPJ1
what was the lasting impact of preventing the large hearst and pulitzer syndicates from gaining a lasting foothold in texas journalism?
The lasting impact of preventing the large Hearst and Pulitzer syndicates from gaining a lasting foothold in Texas journalism was the promotion of diversity in the state's media landscape.
How did preventing Hearst and Pulitzer allow for Texan diversity ?In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer were two of the most powerful newspaper publishers in the United States, and their media empires dominated many local and regional markets. However, in Texas, smaller, independent newspapers were able to resist their attempts to gain a foothold, and a more diverse media landscape emerged as a result.
This diversity had several lasting impacts. First, it allowed for a greater range of perspectives and viewpoints to be represented in Texas journalism, which promoted greater civic engagement and informed public debate.
Find out more on Hearst and Pulitzer at https://brainly.com/question/944878
#SPJ1
what is similar about the history of african american, hispanic, native american, and asian american police officers in the united states?
African American, Hispanic, Native American, and Asian American police officers in the United States all share a history of exclusion and discrimination. In many areas of the country, police departments were historically limited in hiring officers from these minority groups until the 1950s and 1960s. Thecivil rights movement brought about much needed change for these minority groups, but racism and discrimination in law enforcement still remain a problem in some areas.
One similarity among all of these minority groups is that they faced significant barriers to entry into the police force. Most departments had regulations which set a lower physical fitness requirement for minority officers, or in some cases had quotas on the number of minority officers who could be hired. They were often subject to more intense scrutiny than white officers and faced more severe consequences for minor mistakes or transgressions.
Another similarity among these minority groups is that all were part of the reform of police practices in the United States. In the 1970s and 1980s, several police departments created specialized minority recruitment programs. These programs were designed to attract more minority officers to the force and create more diverse departments. Finally, many of these minority officers have fought for greater police accountability and oversight in their own communities.
In conclusion, African American, Hispanic, Native American, and Asian American police officers in the United States all have a shared history of exclusion and discrimination. They have faced significant barriers to entry into the police force and have been part of the reform of police practices in the United States.
To know more about African American, Hispanic, Native American, and Asian American refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/30553573
#SPJ11
What was Oppenheimer saying about the atomic bomb in this passage?
The story of Oppenheimer's infamous quote. As he witnessed the first detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, a piece of Hindu scripture ran through the mind of Robert Oppenheimer: “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds “
Benito Mussolini made himself dictator of ______ by promoting an aggressive brand of nationalism called fascism.
Benito Mussolini established fascism as the dominant nationalist ideology in Italy and used it to his advantage.
Fascism is a far-right political philosophy that supports militarization, radical nationalism, and a powerful centralised government run by a dictator. It fosters the concept that some people and groups are better than others and emphasises the state's priority over the individual. Fascist governments frequently repress dissent and resistance, and they may resort to violence and intimidation to further their objectives. Early in the 20th century, fascism developed in Europe, especially in Italy, and was characterised by totalitarianism, racism, and authoritarianism. The history of the world has been significantly impacted by fascism's legacy, especially during World War II.
Learn more about fascism here:
https://brainly.com/question/15080505
#SPJ4
what is the main reason that the texas constitution of 1876 would have pleased many former confederates?
The main reason that the Texas Constitution of 1876 would have pleased many former Confederates is that it reduced the power of the state government and limited the rights of African Americans.
It provided few restrictions on corporations and limited government interference in the economy. It also extended voting rights to all men, regardless of race or previous status as a Confederate soldier.
The Texas Constitution of 1876 removed the Reconstruction-era requirements that the state's governor and lieutenant governor be of different political parties.
This meant that former Confederates, who largely held a single political affiliation, were more likely to be represented in government.
Furthermore, African Americans had few rights and few options for legal recourse against oppression. The limited government interference in the economy was also attractive to former Confederates, as it allowed them to remain economically successful and autonomous.
Finally, the extension of voting rights to all men, regardless of race or previous Confederate status, was a major draw for former Confederates.
To know more about Confederates click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11649223#
#SPJ11
The English government became a military dictatorship under what leader?
Oliver Cromwell
Charles I
James I
William Cecil
What is scarcity?
A. the fundamental economic problem of having seemingly limited human wants in a
world of limited resources
B. the fundamental economic problem of having seemingly unlimited human wants in a
world of limited resources
C. the fundamental economic problem of having seemingly unlimited human wants in a
world of unlimited resources
D.None of the Above
How did the sharecropping system result in debt peonage for many former slaves?
O A. by allowing farmers to use money from crops to purchase land
OB. by forcing farmers to rely on company stores for seasonal credit
OC. by requiring farmers to work in Southern factories to repay loans
OD. by requiring farmers to sell their crops to the government at extremely low prices
Answer:
The answer is c.By requiring farmers to work in southern factories to repay loans.
Explanation:
why is having white allies in a fight for racial justice so important?
White Allies dispels the myth that racial justice is exclusively the concern of people of color by demonstrating that white men and women have taken up this fight in the past, often at considerable personal danger.
What factors most exacerbate injustice?Despite the fact that racism, economic inequality, and class prejudice are some of its main causes, social injustice can damage anyone. Social injustice exists when one group is treated more favorably than another due to its wealth, power, or position.
White Allies dispels the myth that only people of color are concerned about racial justice by demonstrating how white people have historically taken up this fight, frequently at considerable personal danger. Their experiences are intended to be an inspiration, a wake-up call, and a motivator for action to act in support of equality and human dignity at a time when racial injustice is receiving more attention.
Learn more about Social injustice: https://brainly.com/question/28220571
#SPJ1
write a well-developed essay identifying an american who to united states history from the period 1900 to
The American who made the most significant contribution to United States history from 1900 to the present is Franklin D. Roosevelt.
He led the United States through the Great Depression and World War II, implementing the New Deal and helping the country to recover from economic disaster. He also negotiated the post-war peace treaty, greatly improving the nation's standing in the world. His legacy is one of resilience, perseverance, and hope.
In 1933, FDR proposed the New Deal, a plan of relief, recovery, and reform, which put millions of Americans back to work and helped to build infrastructure.
He then led the country through World War II, boosting morale and launching multiple successful campaigns in the Pacific and Europe. FDR also successfully negotiated the post-war peace treaty, securing a lasting peace for the United States and its allies.
Franklin D. Roosevelt's legacy has been felt in the United States for decades, and his influence is still felt today. His policies of relief, recovery, and reform helped the nation to survive the Great Depression and build a more secure and prosperous future.
He also successfully led the country through World War II and the post-war peace treaty, establishing a lasting peace and security for the United States.
To know more about Great Depression click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180#
#SPJ11
Which if the following did not Contribute to American hysteria during the
Cold War?
A. The Rosenberg espionage case and their execution.
B. Joseph McCarthy and his speeches about communists in America.
C. Americans being encouraged to build fallout shelters.
D. The excessive growth of sub
The last option D is fully correct that is excessive growth of sub.
What is American Hysteria in cold war?Due to rising communist tensions between the US and the Soviet Union after World War II, the Cold War eventually broke out. There was growing hysteria across the country as Americans started to fear the spread of communism. Through legislation, the Eisenhower administration tried to calm American hysteria. However, American hysteria remained constant due to both their fear of communism and their failing economy.
Nash's schizophrenia would have a strangely parallel context in a world of genuine danger and occasionally paranoia. Nash referred to himself as "the communist" in a world that was divided into communist and capitalist camps.
To know about cold war visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ1
What role did Orval Faubus play in the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s?
A) He was convicted of killing Medgar Evers, the field secretary of the NAACP in the state of Mississippi.
B) He was the United States Supreme Court Justice who wrote the majority opinion the case of Brown v. Board of Education.
C) He was the Governor of Arkansas who sought to prevent the integration of Little Rock High School.
D) He was the Governor of Alabama who sought to prevent the integration of the University of Alabama.
Answer:
C) He was the Governor of Arkansas who sought to prevent the integration of Little Rock High School.
C) He was the Governor of Arkansas who sought to prevent the integration of Little Rock High School.
what is valhalla made of? question 7 options: the skulls of dragons the bones of conquered warriors spears and shields the wood from sunken viking ships
Valhalla is made up of the bones of conquered warriors. It is a place of strength, honor, and glory, where the bravest warriors go after their death. The Einherjar who reach this paradise will feast, drink mead with Odin, and hone their skills for the final battle.
Valhalla is a term from Norse mythology that refers to a warrior's paradise where the bravest and mightiest warriors would go after their death. According to the mythology, the Viking warriors who die in battle are carried to Valhalla by the Valkyries, where they are welcomed with a feast.
The warriors who reach this afterlife paradise are known as Einherjar. The Einherjar are not mere spirits but actual physical beings who will fight for Odin in the final battle against the giants. The Great Hall of Valhalla was the center of the afterlife, where Odin presides over the warriors with his Valkyries.
According to the mythology, Valhalla is made up of the bones of conquered warriors, and its walls are lined with shields. These shields were used by the Einherjar in their mock battles.
Know more about Valhalla here:
https://brainly.com/question/9233703
#SPJ11
question 1 what issue was resolved with the great compromise between the federalists and anti-federalists? the legality of slavery in individual states representation in the two legislative houses how the president and senators would be elected
The Great Compromise between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists resolved the issue of representation in Congress, specifically how the number of representatives each state would receive in both legislative houses.
The compromise created a bicameral Congress, with the House of Representatives based on proportional representation based on population, and the Senate with each state receiving two representatives regardless of population.
This compromise allowed states with small populations to be represented equally in Congress, while still allowing states with larger populations to have more representation.
To know more about Federalists click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/28563784#
#SPJ11
Hickson and Stacks (1993) found that people like to be closer to those people who are seen as having social stigmas. T/F.
The given statement, "Hickson and Stacks (1993) found that people like to be closer to those people who are seen as having social stigmas" is false because Hickson and Stacks (1993) did not find that people like to be closer to those people having social stigmas.
What did Hickson and Stacks (1993) find?Hickson and Stacks (1993) conducted a study on social categorization and social identification. They found that people tend to categorize themselves and others into social groups based on common characteristics, such as age, gender, ethnicity, etc.
People also tend to identify more strongly with the groups they belong to and perceive others who belong to their group as more similar to themselves. However, they did not find that people like to be closer to those who have social stigmas. Therefore, this is false.
To know more about stigmas refer: https://brainly.com/question/29471656
#SPJ11
to justify american intervention in the venezuela boundary dispute with britain, secretary of state olney invoked the
To justify American intervention in the Venezuela boundary dispute with Britain, Secretary of State Olney invoked the Monroe Doctrine.
What is the Monroe Doctrine?The Monroe Doctrine was established by the United States in 1823. It was an international policy aimed at avoiding European colonialism in the Americas.
The doctrine, which was first introduced by President James Monroe in his seventh annual message to Congress in 1823, stated that the United States would not meddle in European affairs and that Europe should not meddle in American affairs.
European interference in the Americas, according to the Monroe Doctrine, would be viewed as a threat to the security of the United States. As a result, the United States pledged to protect the newly independent nations in the Americas.
Furthermore, the doctrine aimed to promote peace and stability in the region, which would also benefit the United States.
What is the Venezuela boundary dispute?The Venezuela boundary dispute arose in 1895 between Great Britain and Venezuela. The dispute was over the border separating British Guiana from Venezuela. Venezuela disputed the border and claimed a large portion of British Guiana.
The British, on the other hand, rejected the claim and stated that the border had already been established by treaty. The issue of ownership remained unresolved for a long time.
What was the justification for American intervention?Secretary of State Olney, in an effort to resolve the Venezuela boundary dispute, used the Monroe Doctrine as a basis for American intervention. He argued that the United States was justified in intervening in the dispute because it affected the United States' security interests.
Britain's presence in the Western Hemisphere, according to Olney, threatened American security. As a result, he stated that the United States was authorized to use force to protect its security interests under the Monroe Doctrine.
To know more about Monroe Doctrine, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30723899#
#SPJ11
What was the name of the government established after World War 1 in Germany?
Answer:
The Weimar Republic was Germany's government from 1919 to 1933, the period after World War I until the rise of Nazi Germany. It was named after the town of Weimar where Germany's new government was formed by a national assembly after Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated
In 3-4 sentences, write a brief description of the public response that followed 9/11.
How did other countries react?
Answer:
Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, there was a widespread public response of shock, horror, and grief. The attacks led to a surge of patriotism and a sense of unity among Americans, as well as increased government surveillance and security measures. The event also triggered military action and international relations changes.
did germany's plan to end the fighting on the eastern front work? what long-term impact does this decision have on the rest of the world
Germany's plan to end the fighting on the Eastern Front did not work. This decision had a long-term impact on the rest of the world in terms of war reparations and territorial changes.
At the end of World War I, Germany was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, which included crippling reparations and the loss of much of Germany's territory in the east. This led to discontent in Germany and eventually the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.
The Nazis focused on remilitarization and regaining the lost territory in the east. This resulted in the start of World War II in 1939, as Germany invaded Poland and the USSR in 1941. This led to several years of bloody conflict, culminating in the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945.
The long-term impact of Germany's attempt to end the fighting on the Eastern Front is still felt today. World War II changed the map of Europe, with the establishment of new countries and the dissolution of old empires. It also set the stage for the Cold War, with the Soviet Union and the United States becoming the two main superpowers in the world.
The legacy of World War II still remains today in the form of memorials, museums, and public education about the horrors of war. The end of the war also saw the establishment of the United Nations and other international organizations, which were created to ensure that such a tragedy never happened again.
To know more about World War II refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/14423766
#SPJ11
Why was the Ottoman Empire a desirable territory for European nations during the nineteenth century?
Answer:
Europe needed the Ottoman Empire as a trading partner because they controlled the access to Eastern goods. Since Europe required the Eastern goods, they had to become partners with the Ottoman Empire.
working closely with members of the tejano elite in texas, how did anglo settlers in texas undermine the anti-slavery provisions of the mexican constitution?
Anglo settlers in Texas undermined the anti-slavery provisions of the Mexican Constitution by working closely with members of the Tejano elite.
As the Anglo settlers began to flood into Texas, they found themselves at odds with the Tejano elite. The Tejano elite, who had been in Texas for generations, saw the Anglo settlers as a threat to their way of life. They were afraid that the Anglo settlers would take over their land, their businesses, and their culture.
However, the Anglo settlers were able to work their way into the Tejano elite's good graces by offering them money and political power. In exchange for their support, the Anglo settlers were able to undermine the anti-slavery provisions of the Mexican Constitution.
They did this by bringing in more and more slaves from the United States. The Tejano elite, who had originally been opposed to slavery, soon saw the financial benefits of owning slaves. They began to buy slaves themselves, and they also used their political power to protect the Anglo settlers' right to own slaves.
To know more about Anglo settlers, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6282145#
#SPJ11
The Executive Branch can "check" the Legislative Branch by:
A.) Declare laws unconstitutional
B.) Nominate judges
C.) Confirm the president's nominations
D.) President can veto (say no) to congressional legislation
True or False?
Salt and ivory were the most valuable African goods traded within Africa.
Answer:True
Explanation:Ivory and salt were at high demand.