Mr Robinson worked in an office. Every morning he had
breakfast with his wife at half-past seven, read his newspaper,
drank a cup of coffee and then left his house at 8 o'clock to
go to catch his train to town.
One morning he was still sitting comfortably at the break-
fast table and reading his newspaper at five minutes past eight.
He did not seem to be in a hurry and asked his wife for another
cup of coffee.
'Another cup?' she asked. 'But aren't you going to the
office today? Have you got a holiday?'
"The office?" he said and looked up from his newspaper
very surprised. 'I thought that I was at the office!'

Where did Mr Robinson work?
What did he do every morning?
At what time did he do it?
What did he do then?
When did he leave his house?
Where did he go then?
Why did he go there?
What happened one morning?
What time was it?
Was he late?
Was he in a hurry?
What did he ask his wife for?
What did she say?
What did he answer?
How did he feel?

A summary of the article "The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt" including key ideas and details should be developed concisely, identifying the full context of the article.

The first step is to identify the central idea of the text, which is usually contained in the introduction, where the author explains the topic to be developed in the body of the text. After finding the central idea, you can describe the most important details in a logical and objective way, helping the reader to understand the text more directly.

Therefore, the article "The Moral Logic of Survivor Guilt" refers to the lives of soldiers and their emotions derived from their experiences, such as anguish and trauma, which you can exemplify through your summary.

Find out more about summary on:

https://brainly.com/question/25605883

#SPJ1

Answer: I hope this help. Mark me brainlist

Explanation:

Although he married a deaf woman, a former speech pupil, Mabel Hubbard, Bell strongly opposed intermarriage among congenitally deaf people. Bell feared "contamination" of the human race by the propagation of deaf people even though most deaf people statistically are born to hearing parents.He said that marriage between two Deaf individuals posed a threat of a deaf-mute variety of the human race. Because one of his reasons was that he thought that two deaf people could produce of deaf child which is not the case because more than 90% of deaf children are born to hearing parents.