Answer:
(C.) American culture and values
Explanation:
Nativists wanted America to stay as a pure nation based on the original, Anglo Europeans who settled across the 13 colonies.
From the Declaration of Independence (1776)
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to
dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume
among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of
Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of
mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the
separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are
endowed [provided] by their Creator with certain unalienable [unable to take away]
rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-That to
secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed, -That whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish
it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
Safety and Happiness.
1.When was this document written?
2. Who wrote this document?
3. What are the main ideas of the first
paragraph of the Declaration of Independence?
4. What are the main ideas of the second
paragraph of the Declaration of Independence?
5. According to the document, why was it written?
Answer: written by Thomas Jefferson in The Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. It was engrossed on parchment and on August 2, 1776, delegates began signing it. 1st main idea The introductory sentence states the Declaration's main purpose, to explain the colonists' right to revolution. In other words, “to declare the causes which impel them to the separation.” Congress had to prove the legitimacy of its cause. It had just defied the most powerful nation on Earth. 2nd main idea The second portion of the document describes how King George III disregarded those natural rights to establish a tyranny over the colonies and sets up a justification for American independence. Its goals were to rally the troops, win foreign allies, and announce the creation of a new country. The introductory sentence states the Declaration's main purpose, to explain the colonists' right to revolution. In other words, “to declare the causes which impel them to the separation.” The Declaration of Independence was written to explain why the colonists were declaring independence from Great Britain and why the colonists had a right to do so.
1. What is this cartoon's topic/theme?
2. Who is the figure depicted in the image?
3. What is the cartoon's message?
4. How does this message relate to lessons we studied in this module?
Your assignment involves addressing the following issues: 1. What is - 1
The cartoon's theme is how the nation of Great Britain is taking a lot from the colonies.
The figure depicted in the image is the nation of Great Brtiain as the Mother country.
The cartoon's message is that Britain keeps taking resources from her colonies and one can infer that this would lead to problems in future.
The message relates to lessons on the reason why the American colonies wanted independence.
How to describe the cartoon ?The cartoon represents a common theme in the history of colonialism: the exploitation of colonies by the imperial power. The figure of Great Britain is depicted as a mother figure, taking resources from her colonies as if they were her children.
This theme of exploitation was one of the key factors that led to the American colonies seeking independence from Great Britain. The colonists felt that they were being treated unfairly, with Britain imposing taxes and regulations on them without their consent.
Find out more on cartoons at https://brainly.com/question/18742499
#SPJ1
help!!! I will give all my brainiest (253) depending on the answer you give !!! (middle school)
This template will help you write a speech about ratifying the Constitution. Remember to include lines that explain checks and balances, as well as the viewpoints of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.
Speech Title: Balancing Power in the Constitution
Your Name:
Reviewer (Parent or Guardian):
Date:
First Paragraph: Hook your audience into wanting to read or hear your speech. You can tell a story or use a quote. Introduce the event and basic facts like people and places. Use at least three to five sentences.
Second paragraph: Discuss the separation of powers and checks and balances. Use examples to explain the difference between the two ideas.
Third paragraph: Discuss the position of the Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
Fourth paragraph: Discuss the position of the Anti-Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
Fifth paragraph: Summarize and review what you wrote.
Reviewer Suggestions:
Answer:
Speech Title: Balancing Power in the Constitution
Your Name: [Insert Your Name]
Reviewer (Parent or Guardian): [Insert Reviewer's Name]
Date: [Insert Date]
First Paragraph:
Ladies and gentlemen, have you ever thought about how our country was formed and the framework that our founding fathers laid down for us to follow? Well, let me take you back to the year 1787. Our country was in turmoil as the Articles of Confederation were not working effectively, and there was a need for a new constitution. In this speech, I will discuss the importance of balancing power in the Constitution and why it was necessary to have checks and balances.
Second Paragraph:
The separation of powers and checks and balances are two fundamental concepts in the Constitution. The separation of powers means that the government is divided into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Each branch has its own responsibilities and powers. Checks and balances, on the other hand, means that each branch has the ability to limit the power of the other branches. For example, the legislative branch can override a veto from the executive branch, and the judicial branch can declare a law passed by the legislative branch unconstitutional.
Third Paragraph:
The Federalists believed in the ratification of the Constitution. They argued that a strong federal government was necessary to maintain order and protect the nation's interests. They also believed that the Constitution provided sufficient protections for individual rights.
Fourth Paragraph:
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were against the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that a strong federal government would lead to tyranny, and they feared that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual rights. They argued for a Bill of Rights to be added to the Constitution to protect individual liberties.
Fifth Paragraph:
In conclusion, balancing power in the Constitution was crucial to ensuring that no one branch of government had too much power. The separation of powers and checks and balances were designed to prevent tyranny and protect individual liberties. While the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing opinions on the ratification of the Constitution, their debates and discussions helped to shape the document that has been the foundation of our government for over 200 years.
Reviewer Suggestions:
Great job! You did an excellent job of explaining the importance of balancing power in the Constitution and providing examples of checks and balances. You also provided a clear explanation of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist positions on the ratification of the Constitution. One suggestion would be to include more specific examples of how checks and balances work in practice. Overall, a well-written and informative speech!
Engage-
You are watching the news and they are showing a school where students are leaving the building, fire trucks are on site, and
you can see windows are open.
Some students are coughing and being assisted outside.
You overhear a student say something about a science lab, but you can't hear the rest.
It would appear from the provided information that the school has experienced some kind of incident or emergency.
What took place in the school?The presence of fire trucks and windows that are open suggests that the building has been evacuated due to a fire or other potentially hazardous situation. The fact that some students are coughing and getting help outside suggests that they may have been exposed to fumes or chemicals or have poor air quality. The reference to a science lab may suggest that the incident was caused by a lab experiment or equipment failure. To stay informed and ensure your own safety, it is essential to adhere to the news coverage as well as any official announcements or instructions issued by authorities.
To learn more about emergency visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30450378
#SPJ1
Suppose you support the efforts of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus to reform Rome. Write a letter or speech to other Romans that
explains why reform is needed and what types of reforms should occur.
The answer is the reforms in Rome from Tiberius and Gaius included limiting land ownership to 125 hectares per citizen or 250 hectares per family, and distributing the freed-up land to the poorest Romans, usually free of charge.
A triumvirate which included Tiberius' brother, Gaius Gracchus, was charged with enacting the law.
The reforms were needed because of to the military and logistical stagnation of the Roman Republic in the late 2nd century BC.
Reforms signify historically?Since 1663, the idea of reform has been in society. Reform is described as "The repair, or modifying for the better, of some faulty condition of things, esp. of a corrupt or oppressive political institution or practice; the eradication of some abuse or injustice".
An instance of reform?Reforms on a variety of topics, having women's rights, remove of slavery, jail reform, and missionary activity in the West, sparked organizations devoted to advancing society. These initiatives frequently began in Protestant churches.
To know more about Reforms visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18010893
#SPJ1
Eliade holds that the element of fear in experiences of the
sacred
Show answer choices
A) have become more common in modern times.
B
C
are the one constant element in the history of
religions.
have become less common in modern times.
D were never particularly common.
The one continuous factor in religious experiences throughout history, according to Eliade, has been terror.
What is said about the sacred by Eliade?Eliade emphasises that the Sacred occurs in human experience as a significant point of orientation while also granting access to the ontological reality that serves as its source and is what homo religiosus yearns for in his expansion and explanation of the phenomenological components of the Sacred.
What is sacred time according to Eliade?According to Eliade's view, just as a thing's power comes from its source, the power of the entire world comes from the cosmogony. The mythological age is holy time—the only time that has any value—if the Sacred established all legitimate patterns in the beginning, during the period depicted in myth.
To know more about experiences visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/7279736
#SPJ1
Which statement about Hitler's treatment of European Jews is correct?
Responses
Jews who lived in Germany and had good jobs were not discriminated against.
Jews who lived in Germany and had good jobs were not discriminated against.
Jews all over Europe were rounded up and sent to concentration camps to be murdered.
Jews all over Europe were rounded up and sent to concentration camps to be murdered.
Hitler's persecution of the Jews led the United States to declare war on Germany.
Hitler's persecution of the Jews led the United States to declare war on Germany.
Most of the Jews in Europe fled to the United States in the years before World War II.
Answer:
Explanation:
Jews all over Europe were rounded up and sent to concentration camps to be murdered. Or Hitler's persecution of the Jews led the United States to declare war on Germany.
Scientists sometimes describe the canyon walls as a timeline. How is this description accurate?
Answer:
When scientists talk about the canyon walls as a timeline, they mean that the layers of rock in the Grand Canyon were created over millions of years and each one gives a glimpse into the past of the Earth. So if you were to climb down to the bottom of the canyon and check out the layers, you'd be looking at a timeline that goes back millions of years. Each layer of rock tells its own story about the conditions and creatures that were present at the time it was formed. For example, there might be fossils of ancient sea creatures, which shows that the area used to be covered by a sea. Or there could be sandstone or sedimentary rocks, which suggests that it was once a desert or a riverbed. So basically, scientists are saying that the canyon walls are like a book with pages full of stories about the Earth's past.
Answer: Canyons Reveal Earth's History
By studying the exposed layers of rock in a canyon wall, experts can learn about how the climate changed, what kind of organisms were alive at certain times, and perhaps even how the canyon may change in the future.
The oldest rocks exposed in the canyon are ancient, 1,840 million years old. Conversely, the canyon itself is geologically young, having been carved in the last 6 million years.
Geologists call the process of canyon formation downcutting. Downcutting occurs as a river carves out a canyon or valley, cutting down into the earth and eroding rock. Downcutting happens during flooding. When large amounts of water are moved through a river channel, large rocks, and boulders are carried too.
Examine the scenario below. Determine which foreign policy goal the responding international agency is trying to achieve.
Mexico has greatly increased its agricultural output and is one of the largest producers of avocados worldwide. The demand for avocados is high, but Mexico cannot afford to pay the high tariffs many nations charge. NAFTA has decided to step in and promote free trade between Mexico, the United States, and Canada.
Responses
National Security
Spread Democracy
Economic Growth
Human Rights
The foreign policy goal that the responding international agency, NAFTA, is trying to achieve is economic growth.
What is NAFTA?The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was an agreement signed by the United States, Canada, and Mexico in 1994 creating a free trade market between the three countries. It eliminated tariffs on most goods traded between the countries and facilitated investment in each other’s markets.
NAFTA is attempting to promote free trade between Mexico, the United States, and Canada by reducing or eliminating tariffs on goods traded among the countries. The goal is to boost economic growth and global prosperity in the region by increasing the ability of each country to trade goods with the others without being hindered by tariffs.
By doing so, NAFTA hopes to create more opportunities for businesses and consumers, as well as to increase the amount of goods and services available to them. This will help to create jobs and increase wages, leading to higher standards of living for the citizens of all three countries. Additionally, it will allow for more efficient and productive use of resources, as well as encouraging international cooperation and collaboration. This can ultimately lead to greater economic stability and prosperity in the region.
For more questions related to NAFTA
https://brainly.com/question/29888982
#SPJ1
Please i need a to write a paper with all the instructions i need 750 words please i really really need help I don't know how to do this I am not good for Government class please.
This course is about politics, governmental policies, and people. Select a topic which covers a current event or situation that addresses a local or foreign issue, problem or person of international consequence.
Learn about a current political issue or problem of political consequence.
Develop your Internet and library research skills.
Evaluate your topic from the perspective of different cultures and/or political viewpoints as well as your own.
Expectations:
What your paper should focus on:
1. Address the various sides of the issue with conclusions based on your own analysis of the issue, and demonstrating an understanding of its complexities.
2. Compare and contrast the different viewpoints of sources used on your topic taking into account the limits of a position.
3. Present an informed evaluation of the evidence and different viewpoint surrounding the topic
How they interact,
The impact of government policy,
How and if they benefit society,
If it is worthy of the cost,
If the policy needs to be changed, expanded or eliminated,
What effects they create - good or bad
Explanation:
Introduction:
Politics is a complex and dynamic field that affects individuals and societies globally. Governments formulate policies that impact people's lives in many ways. This paper aims to discuss a current political issue of international consequence, its various perspectives, and evaluate its impact on society.
Topic Selection:
The selected topic for this paper is the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. This issue has been a longstanding one and has had a significant impact on the Middle East region and the global community. The conflict has resulted in the displacement of thousands of Palestinians, loss of life, and destruction of property.
Research and Analysis:
In researching the issue, it is important to consider the perspectives of both sides. Israeli and Palestinian sources present different views on the causes and solutions to the conflict. According to Israeli sources, the conflict began when Arab nations refused to accept the United Nations' decision to establish two states, one Jewish and one Arab, in the area known as Palestine in 1947. The Arab nations, including Palestine, rejected this plan and instead declared war on the newly formed state of Israel. In contrast, Palestinian sources argue that the conflict began with the displacement of Palestinians during the establishment of Israel and the subsequent occupation of Palestinian territories.
It is also important to consider the impact of government policies on the conflict. Israel's policy of building settlements in the West Bank and Gaza Strip has been a significant source of tension between the two sides. Palestinians view these settlements as illegal and a barrier to the establishment of a Palestinian state. Israeli leaders argue that these settlements are necessary for Israel's security and are built on land that they consider part of Israel.
Evaluation:
The conflict between Israel and Palestine has had far-reaching effects on the region and the world. The displacement of Palestinians and the ongoing violence have resulted in a humanitarian crisis. The international community has attempted to broker peace negotiations, but these efforts have been unsuccessful. The United States, in particular, has played a significant role in the conflict, providing military and financial aid to Israel while being accused of bias towards Israel.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the conflict between Israel and Palestine is a complex issue that requires a multi-faceted approach to resolve. It is important to consider the perspectives of both sides, the impact of government policies, and the humanitarian consequences of the conflict. It is crucial for the international community to continue to work towards a peaceful resolution to the conflict and to address the root causes of the issue. Ultimately, the goal should be to establish a just and lasting peace that benefits both Israelis and Palestinians.
Does the constitution and bill of rights define the government as a parent?
Answer:
No, the government is not referred to be a parent in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.
Explanation:
No, the government is not referred to be a parent in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Instead, they build a democracy-based governmental structure with the legislative, executive, and judicial departments of government all sharing equal authority with the people. The government is not described as a parent in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, which outline the fundamental freedoms and rights of people and lay out the rules for how the government will function.
Describe one change in political structure that occurred in the Americas during the period 1450-1750
Answer:
One change in political structure that occurred in the Americas during the period 1450-1750 was the rise of powerful empires such as the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans, who controlled vast territories and established complex systems of governance. These empires were characterized by strong centralization of power, social stratification, and extensive trade networks.
Explanation:
The advent of strong empires like the Aztecs, Incas, and Mayans, who ruled over enormous areas and had intricate systems of government, was one change in political organization that took place in the Americas between 1450 and 1750.
What one instance of a political structural shift that took place in the Americas?
Spanish Empire administration. sovereign monarchy. A monarch has unrestricted power and is often not subject to written laws, the legislature, or traditions. These monarchs are frequently hereditary.
These are the political developments that took place in the 15th and 16th centuries: During the 15th and 16th centuries, European rulers expanded their financial and military clout. They established strong new states. They were extremely important for Europe. In some parts of the world, empires fell, while in some places new imperial nations, like the Mongol khanates, took their place. Similar to Eurasia, the Americas and Africa also have state systems that have developed in extent and reach while exhibiting continuity, innovation, and variety.
Learn more about political:
https://brainly.com/question/10369837
#SPJ1
How do you think that people convicted of committing crime will be punished in the United States in the future?
In recent years, there has been a growing movement in the United States to reform the criminal justice system and move away from punitive measures toward more rehabilitative and restorative approaches.
This includes initiatives such as diversion programs, drug courts, and community-based alternatives to incarceration.
What role did the criminal justice system play?The criminal justice system is responsible for maintaining law and order, investigating and prosecuting crimes, and punishing offenders. In medieval society, the criminal justice system was generally controlled by the king or other rulers, who delegated authority to local officials to enforce the law.
The criminal justice system in medieval Europe was often harsh and punitive, with severe penalties for even minor crimes. Punishments could include fines, imprisonment, flogging, branding, mutilation, and even execution. The justice system was also often biased against marginalized groups such as women, minorities, and the poor.
To learn more about the criminal justice system, click
brainly.com/question/28913925
#SPJ1
How long ago did NCs mountain range start forming?
Answer:
Mountain ranges are formed by a variety of geological processes.
Explanation:
But most of the significant ones on earth are the result of plate tectonic.
why are the wigwams inpordent to learn about
Answer:
For several reasons, it's crucial to learn about wigwams:
1) Cultural significance: Certain Native American tribes, including the Algonquian and the Ojibwe, still live in wigwams today. Understanding wigwams can help us comprehend the customs and culture of these indigenous peoples.
2) Historical significance: Before European settlers came to North America, Native American tribes used wigwams for thousands of years. They were crucial for providing shelter from the elements and acting as gathering spots for neighbourhood celebrations and rituals. We can better comprehend North American history and the ways in which Native American civilizations were structured by knowing about wigwams.
Do you feel that the ERA still needs to be ratified, or have women already reached the point of true equality with men in the U.S.? Explain your answer.
Answer:
The Equal Rights Amendment is a proposed amendment to the US Constitution that would guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of their gender. While the amendment was first introduced in 1923, it has yet to be ratified and become law, despite ongoing efforts to pass it.
Despite significant progress towards gender equality in the US, there are still areas where women do not have the same rights and opportunities as men. For example, women in the US still earn less than men for the same work and are underrepresented in positions of power and leadership.
Furthermore, women are more likely to experience gender-based violence and discrimination, including sexual harassment and assault. Women also face unique challenges related to reproductive rights and healthcare.
While there has been progress in advancing gender equality in the US, the fact remains that women do not have full legal and social equality with men. Therefore, the ERA remains relevant and necessary to ensure that women have equal protection under the law and are able to enjoy the same rights and opportunities as men.
Explanation:
Identify two primary sources from online databases or archives that help you understand the royal proclamation of 1763.
The Royal Proclamation of 1763, sometimes known as the Proclamation of 1763, was issued by King George III following Great Britain's victory in the French and Indian War. West of the Appalachian Mountains, the proclamation forbade colonisation on Native American land.
What did the 1763 Royal Proclamation accomplish?On October 7, 1763, King George III published the Royal Proclamation of 1763. The Seven Years' War was officially concluded by the Treaty of Paris, which also gave Great Britain control over French territories in North America. At the Eastern Continental Divide in the Appalachian Mountains, the Proclamation Line of 1763 was a boundary drawn by the British. The Proclamation Line, which was established on October 7, 1763, banned Anglo-American colonists from settling on territories obtained from the French after the French and Indian War.The Royal Proclamation served as the cornerstone for the development of Canada's territorial framework and is a key document in the relationship between First Nations people and the Crown. The opportunity to honour this memorial as a significant moment in Canadian history is rare.To learn more about The Royal Proclamation of 1763, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/2776713
King George III issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763, also known as the Proclamation of 1763, following Great Britain's victory in the French and Indian War.
What was the Royal Proclamation of 1763 used for?Anglo-American colonists were prohibited from settling in French-occupied territory following the French and Indian War by the Proclamation Line, which was established on October 7, 1763.
The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was made public by King George III on October 7, 1763. The Treaty of Paris, which also gave Great Britain control over French territories in North America, marked the official end of the Seven Years' War.
The British established a boundary in 1763 by drawing the Proclamation Line at the Eastern Continental Divide in the Appalachian Mountains. The Royal Proclamation is an important document in the relationship between First Nations people and the Crown. It was the foundation for the creation of Canada's territorial framework. It is extremely uncommon to commemorate this memorial as a significant moment in Canadian history.
To learn more about Proclamation Line visit :
https://brainly.com/question/510294
#SPJ1
7. CONTRASTING
Underline evidence in the text
of that shows how Thucydides'
study of history differed from
Herodotus'. Which historian's
view more closely reflected the
culture of the time and why?
Answer: 2nd paragraph 3 sentence
Explanation:
Suppose a representative opposes a current tax bill. Would he or she want the bill to be brought to the floor under a closed rule or an open rule? Explain your answer.
A closed rule forbids amendments and restricts debate, whereas an open rule permits changes to be made to the bill on the floor. by allowing for modifications.
What procedures must be followed for a bill to become law?A bill is a draught legislative proposal that, when accepted by the president and both chambers of parliament, becomes a law. immediately after the bill has been framed.
How does a House bill become a law?A representative first sponsors the measure. A committee is then given the task of researching the measure. The measure is placed on a calendar to be voted on, discussed, or altered after it has been issued by the committee. If the invoice By a simple majority (218 out of 435), the bill is approved and is sent to the Senate.
To know more about amendments visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ1
Compelling Question: How do the sources we get exposed to impact how we understand and remember history?
Document A:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document B:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document C:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document D:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Document E:
Evidence of What The White Supremacist View Believes/Stands For Based on This Document
Connections Between What The White Supremacist View Is and What it Promotes or Ignores
Inferences on How The White Supremacist View (in isolation) Would Impact Historical Understanding
Significance of These Inferences
Reflection Questions:
How similar or different is this view of Reconstruction to your own family or community’s view?
What elements of this view of Reconstruction can you see in the United States today?
How does thinking about how the views someone is exposed to impacts how they understand and remember history make you aware of what views you are personally being exposed to?
How do you think this idea of exposure shaping understanding impacts you and how you understand disagreements?
Answer: Electronic copies of this document are available from the Computer ... law enforcement agents to understand how to obtain electronic evidence stored.
Explanation:
Restoration of the Union, reform of southern society, and adoption of progressive laws promoting the rights of emancipated slaves were the three main goals of reconstruction.
What was reconstruction era?
The Reconstruction era, which began after the American Civil War and lasted roughly until the Compromise of 1877, was a time in American history.
Attempts were made to reconstruct the nation after the brutal Civil War, admit the former Confederate states back into the union, and address the political, social, and economic repercussions of slavery during Reconstruction.
The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution were enacted during this time period, presumably guaranteeing the newly freed slaves the same civil rights as those of white people and ending the last Confederate secession in the South.
The U.S. military was given sovereignty over formerly separatist states by Congress, who also mandated that the former Confederate states adopt civil rights protections.
Learn more about reconstruction era, here
https://brainly.com/question/14423201
#SPJ2
What is the correct definition of capacity for potential cosigners?
Answer: Te correct definition of Capacity for potential cosigners is the financial ability to repay a loan with present income.
Explanation:
1. What New Deal programs especially benefited the "common man" & why?
2. What "out-groups" became more accepted under the New Deal?
Answer:
The New Deal programs that especially benefited the "common man" were the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), the Works Progress Administration (WPA), and the Social Security Act.
The CCC provided jobs for unemployed young men, allowing them to support themselves and their families during the Great Depression. They were paid a small wage, but their work had a lasting impact on the environment, as they built trails, planted trees, and fought forest fires.
The WPA provided jobs for millions of unemployed Americans, including construction workers, artists, writers, and musicians. They built schools, parks, highways, and bridges, and created works of art that still exist today.
The Social Security Act provided a safety net for the elderly, the disabled, and families with dependent children. It created a system of old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, and aid to families with dependent children. These programs helped to reduce poverty and provide a basic level of economic security for millions of Americans.
The New Deal era saw a number of "out-groups" become more accepted. African Americans, for example, were included in many New Deal programs, although they still faced discrimination and segregation in many parts of the country. Women also gained new opportunities, as many New Deal programs were open to both men and women. Finally, labor unions became more powerful and more accepted, as workers organized and demanded better wages and working conditions.
The lawmaking process is lengthy and complex, just as the Founders intended. Should the long and difficult legislative process be simplified? Why or why not?
Answer:
no
could also result in lower quality legislation and fewer checks and balances
lot of people's wants are put into consideration when passing a law.
making passing laws quicker could l include less people's input <--- that's less democratic
chatgpt
Which election loss forced the conservative movement to reorganize and change tactics?
A. Kennedy - Nixon
B. Carter - Ford
C. Reagan - Ford
D. Johnson - Goldwater
How was Washington's presidency important?
Answer:
Washington's presidency was significant beyond the fact that he was the first president. His actions established a strong central government and helped put in place a plan to fix the problem of the national debt.
Explanation:
Help please Write 3-5 questions about Gun control why there should be more gun laws. One question needs to involve the effect public discussion has had with your issue. Make sure they are questions that can be answered through research. ( at least 3 cited sources need to be from a magazine, book, journal, newspaper, or historical document)
Explanation:
What evidence suggests that stricter gun laws reduce gun violence, and what are some specific examples of successful gun control policies in other countries? (Sources: "The Effect of Gun Control Laws on Gun Violence: A Review of International Evidence" by Christos Koumpoulidis and Gary Mauser in the Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice Research; "The International Evidence on Gun Control: Understanding a Complex and Sensitive Issue" by Philip J. Cook in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy; "Gun Control: International Comparisons" by David Hemenway in the Journal of the American Medical Association)
How have public discussions about gun control changed over time, and what impact have they had on policy decisions? (Sources: "The Changing Politics of Gun Control" by Robert Spitzer in the Journal of Policy History; "The Effect of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review of the Literature" by Daniel Carpenter and David Yoon in the Annual Review of Political Science; "Guns, Public Opinion, and the Politics of Control" by James D. Wright in Crime and Justice)
How do current gun laws in the United States compare to those in other countries, and what is the impact of these differences on rates of gun violence? (Sources: "Gun Laws and Violence: Comparative Evidence from the United States and Mexico" by Mark Duggan and Randi Hjalmarsson in the Journal of Law and Economics; "Gun Laws and Crime: An Empirical Assessment" by John J. Donohue III in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology; "Gun Laws and Violence: The English Experience" by David McDowell in the American Journal of Criminal Justice)
To what extent did the geographical conditions accounted for the differences. The role of geography in shaping the socio-cultural practices of these two zones?
Geography shapes culture in large part, as do topographical features of the landscape, climate, and natural resources.
How did geography influence the evolution of various civilizations?The first civilizations emerged in areas where the geography favored intensive agriculture. As rulers gained control over larger areas and more resources, governments and states emerged, often using writing and religion to maintain social hierarchies and consolidate power over larger areas and populations.
What is the distinction between social and cultural geography?The study of space and culture, such as languages and traditions, is known as cultural geography. Social geography is the study of social issues in general; this can include inequalities, for example. -They're both quite similar; cultural geography is likely a subfield of social geography.
To know more about geographical visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/20068683
#SPJ1
What did Washington want to do after he resigned his military commission.
Need help with this question please
Nationalism played a critical role in the revolutions in Europe by providing a sense of identity and purpose that united people across class and social divides, and by driving a desire for self-determination and independence from foreign powers.
What exactly is nationalism?Nationalism is a political ideology that emphasizes the importance of a shared national identity, culture, and history, and seeks to promote the interests of the nation-state above all other interests. It is often associated with a sense of pride in one's country and a desire to maintain its independence and sovereignty.
Nationalism can take many different forms, ranging from peaceful and inclusive to exclusive and aggressive. In some cases, nationalism has been used to promote positive values such as democracy, human rights, and social justice. However, it can also lead to intolerance, xenophobia, and aggression towards outsiders, particularly those who are seen as a threat to national identity or interests.
To learn more about Nationalism, click
https://brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ1
Complete the chart about federalist and entifederalist.
The Federalists supported the Constitution and wanted a stronger national government. The Antifederalists opposed the Constitution because they wanted more power to remain with states.
The Federalists were primarily represented New England and Mid-Atlantic States. In the case of Anti-Federalists, they were largely represented within the states of New York, Virginia, and Massachusetts.
The Federalists oppose including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists, who were afraid of a strong centralized government, refused to support the Constitution without one.
The Founding Fathers consisted of George Washington (Federalist), Alexander Hamilton (Federalist Paper Author - Federalist), John Adams (Federalist), James Madison (Federalist Paper Author - Federalist), John Jay (Federalist Paper Author - Federalist), Patrick Henry (Antifederalist), James Monroe (Antifederalist), Richard Henry Lee (Antifederalist), George Manson (Antifederalist), Sam Adams (Antifederalist).
The Federalists supported an effective central government. They supported the establishment of a national bank and favored an industrial, international trade, and commercial economy. The main and most persistent criticism of the Constitution made by the Anti-Federalists was that it did not place any restrictions on the power of the federal government to levy taxes. Nearly all of the works by Antifederalists have as a recurring topic Congress' unrestricted ability to raise taxes.
Federalists supported representational, as opposed to direct, democracy and supported lesser state governments, strong central government, indirect election of government officials, lengthier term restrictions for officeholders. The ratification of the Constitution was contested by antifederalists. Their main contention was that the Constitution gave the federal government too much power and stripped the states of too much authority.
Thanks,
Eddie E.