The group discussion was an effective way of understanding different perspectives and helped me develop a broader outlook on the topic. We communicated effectively, listened actively, used evidence to support our opinions, and followed most of the rules. The group was successful in solving problems and coming to a consensus on some issues, and it was an enriching experience.
The group discussion that we had was regarding climate change and how humans are contributing to it. We had an interactive and intellectual conversation that helped us to understand different perspectives on the issue. Overall, I think that the discussion was effective, informative and gave us a better understanding of how humans are affecting the environment. In preparation for the discussion, we were required to read various articles and watch videos about climate change. I feel that I was well-prepared for the discussion. During the discussion, we established the rules of keeping the conversation respectful, not interrupting each other, and trying to understand each other's points of view. These rules were mostly followed, except for a few instances where some participants interrupted others or failed to listen to their viewpoints. My own background knowledge and values influenced my presentation, as I was passionate about the subject, and I supported my views with evidence and reasoning. However, I tried to remain open-minded and listen to other participants' opinions and viewpoints. In my opinion, the group did an excellent job of responding to each other, actively listening and asking follow-up questions. People used evidence to explain and defend their views, and when someone disagreed with their opinions, they used reasoning to support their ideas.Still, there were times when someone presented their perspective without any evidence or stretched the evidence to fit their view. For example, one of the participants claimed that climate change is not happening, but when asked to provide evidence, he was not able to present any reliable data. During the discussion, we all had different viewpoints, and some of them differed from my own. This difference of opinion helped me to understand the importance of hearing other people's viewpoints and respecting their beliefs.For more such questions on perspectives, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/13107415
#SPJ8
Read the excerpt from Part 1 of The Odyssey.
My men were mutinous,
fools, on stores of wine. Sheep after sheep they
butchered by the surf, and shambling cattle,
feasting,—while fugitives went inland, running
to call to arms the main force of Cicones.
This was an army, trained to fight on horseback
or, where the ground required, on foot. They came
with dawn over that terrain like the leaves
and blades of spring.
Exercise 1 Draw two lines under the verb or verb phrase. Write A (active voice) or P (passive voice) over the verb to tell which voice it is.
Ron fed the birds.
The given sentence is Ron fed the birds. The verb in the given sentence is fed. The voice of the given sentence is A (active voice).The verb fed is in the simple past tense form in the given sentence.
Active voice and passive voice Active voice: When the subject performs the action of a verb, it is known as active voice. The active voice describes what the subject does. Passive voice: When the action of the verb is done upon the subject, it is known as passive voice. In passive voice, the subject is acted upon, while in active voice, the subject is the one that performs the action.
In the given sentence, Ron (subject) performs the action of the verb (fed) upon the birds. Thus, the given sentence is in active voice.
To know more about Ron fed visit:
brainly.com/question/2987977
#SPJ11
One of the primary complaints about the International Criminal
Court is that it:
- is biased against africans
-is too costly to maintain
-is dependent on self reporting
-should be based in a developin
The correct option for "One of the primary complaints about the International Criminal Court is that it" is biased against Africans as it targets Africans more frequently than other groups.
What is International Criminal Court?The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an independent institution with a global scope and mandate. The ICC is the first permanent international court established to try individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. It is the first court of its kind in many respects. It has a wide range of jurisdictional authority, allowing it to investigate and prosecute international crimes committed by people from all over the world. It also allows states to delegate certain cases to the court if they are unable or unwilling to conduct their own investigations or prosecutions.
Regarding the primary complaints about the International Criminal Court, the statement that it is biased against Africans has been a highly controversial issue. Some African countries claim that the ICC is biased against them and that it targets Africans more frequently than other groups. However, others dispute this assertion, pointing out that the ICC is only responsible for cases that are referred to it by member states or the United Nations Security Council. The ICC investigates and prosecutes individuals, not countries, based on the evidence presented before it. It is not interested in the nationality, ethnicity, or political affiliation of the accused.
To know more about the International Criminal Court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29318129
#SPJ11
Which of the following would be considered an informal, positive sanction? choose best answer
Your brother rolls his eyes at you
Your boss gives you a promotion at work
Your crush laughs at your jokes
A police officer gives you a speeding ticket
In order to consider an informal, positive sanction, the answer would be: "Your crush laughs at your jokes."
An informal, positive sanction refers to a non-official, socially-based approval or reward for a particular behavior. It is a form of positive reinforcement that encourages and reinforces certain actions or attitudes. In this case, when your crush laughs at your jokes, it can be considered an informal, positive sanction.
When someone you are romantically interested in laughs at your jokes, it signals a positive response to your humor and can be seen as a form of approval or reward. It creates a sense of connection and reinforces the behavior of making jokes, as it is met with a positive reaction. This informal sanction strengthens the bond between you and your crush, as it indicates mutual enjoyment and shared humor.
In contrast, the other options do not align with an informal, positive sanction. Rolling eyes and giving a speeding ticket are negative sanctions, as they involve disapproval or punishment for certain behaviors. While a promotion at work is positive, it is a formal sanction that typically follows a structured process and is not solely based on personal interactions or approval.
When your crush laughs at your jokes, it can be considered an informal, positive sanction because it signifies approval, strengthens the connection, and reinforces the behavior of making jokes in their presence.
Learn more about sanction
brainly.com/question/16775061
#SPJ11
Bob is to get his new puppy
Bob is excited to get his new puppy.
The word "excited" accurately describes Bob's emotional state and conveys a sense of anticipation, joy, and enthusiasm. When someone is excited, they feel a heightened level of positive emotions, and in this case, Bob's excitement stems from the upcoming arrival of his new puppy.
Excitement often accompanies positive events or experiences that are highly anticipated and bring happiness. In this context, Bob's eagerness and enthusiasm may be fueled by thoughts of playing with the puppy, training it, and building a bond with his new furry friend. The anticipation of the puppy's arrival may fill Bob with positive anticipation and a sense of joy.
Being excited about getting a new puppy is a common and relatable emotion. It reflects the enthusiasm people often have when embarking on a new journey of pet ownership. The excitement is not only about the physical presence of the puppy but also about the emotional connection and companionship it will provide.
The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :
Complete the sentences using the adjective
Bob is ____ to get his new puppy.
excited
scrawny
ocean
low
know more about emotional here:
https://brainly.com/question/9064020
#SPJ8
Use the drop-down menus to identify each italicized phrase as a noun phrase, a verb phrase, or a prepositional
phrase.
We hid Lola's birthday present under the bed.
prepositional phrase
The runner leading the pack is our friend Kirsten.
The construction workers are building a new house.
Answer:
We hid Lola's birthday present under the bed.
"under the bed" is a prepositional phrase.The runner leading the pack is our friend Kirsten.
"leading the pack" is a verb phrase.The construction workers are building a new house.
"building a new house" is a verb phrase.Explanation:
Answer:
Identifying Different Types of Phrases
Use the drop-down menus to identify each italicized phrase as a noun phrase, a verb phrase, or a prepositional phrase.
We hid Lola’s birthday present under the bed.
✔ prepositional phrase
The runner leading the pack is our friend Kirsten.
✔ noun phrase
The construction workers are building a new house.
✔ verb phrase
Explanation:
Although it had been advertised as fully furnished, there was actually _______ furniture in the flat.
Based on the information provided, the missing word in the sentence would be "no". By replacing the blank space with "no," the sentence reads, "Although it had been advertised as fully furnished, there was actually no furniture in the flat." The sentence suggests that despite the advertisement claiming that the flat was fully furnished, there was actually no furniture present.
The addition of "no" underscores the disappointment or surprise the person may have experienced upon realizing the lack of furniture despite the initial claim. The corrected sentence effectively communicates the situation and conveys the discrepancy between the advertised state and the actual condition of the flat.
Know more about sentence correction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26857147
#SPJ11
Argumentative Essay based on
Fahrenheit 451, are the book and movie similar or different?
Needs to have two thesis statements, a rebuttal, and a conclusion
Answer:
Title: "A Comparative Analysis of Fahrenheit 451: The Novel and the Film"
Introduction:
Fahrenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, is a dystopian novel that portrays a future society where books are outlawed, and 'firemen' burn any that are found. The story revolves around Guy Montag, a fireman who undergoes a significant transformation in his outlook on society. The novel was adapted into a film in 1966, directed by François Truffaut. This essay will critically analyze the similarities and differences between the novel and its cinematic adaptation.
Thesis Statement 1:
The novel and film adaptation of Fahrenheit 451 share significant common ground, with the core narrative and themes faithfully represented in the movie.
Evidence for Thesis 1:
Despite the inherent challenges in translating literature to film, Truffaut's Fahrenheit 451 manages to encapsulate the essence of Bradbury's dystopian society. The film stays true to the novel's central plot, depicting Montag's transformation from an unquestioning participant in the book-burning regime to a fugitive dedicated to preserving knowledge. The themes of censorship, the erosion of intellectual freedom, and the perils of an overly controlled society are presented in both mediums, emphasizing Bradbury's cautionary tale.
Thesis Statement 2:
Despite these similarities, there are also notable differences between the novel and the film. Some of the nuanced symbolism and depth of character exploration found in Bradbury's writing are not entirely captured in the movie.
Evidence for Thesis 2:
While the film manages to convey the main narrative, certain aspects of the novel are inevitably lost. For instance, the mechanical hound, a symbol of the oppressive society in the novel, is absent from the film. Moreover, the depth of character development and introspection seen in the novel, particularly for Montag and his wife Mildred, is somewhat diluted in the film. These disparities highlight the challenges of adapting a richly layered novel to a visual medium.
Rebuttal:
However, it can be argued that the movie's divergence from the novel's intricate details does not necessarily constitute a shortcoming. Film and literature are different mediums, each with its own strengths and limitations. While literature allows for deeper introspection and symbolic nuance, film has the power of visual and auditory stimuli, providing a more immersive experience. Thus, the changes made in the film adaptation could be seen as a necessary adaptation to the different medium rather than a failure to capture the novel's essence.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the film adaptation of Fahrenheit 451 faithfully mirrors the novel's central narrative and themes, it inevitably falls short in encapsulating some of the more nuanced aspects of Bradbury's writing. However, considering the differing strengths of film and literature, this divergence is not necessarily a flaw. Both the novel and the film stand as potent critiques of censorship and the dangers of an unthinking, overly controlled society, each in their unique way. The differences and similarities between the two serve as a testament to the versatility and enduring relevance of Bradbury's dystopian vision.