Answer:
k lemmee checkkkkkkkk
I WILL BRAINLIST ITS ONLY ONE PROBLEM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
11/200
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the correct answer boo
what is 37737332732.83838-388733883.6 equal?
Answer:
4838388.34?
Step-by-step explanation:
4.321 × 12.34 AND IF YOU ANSWER YOU GET 10 POINTS JUST PLS HELP
Answer:
53.32114
Step-by-step explanation:
Labor costs. Labor costs for a farmer are $55 per acre for corn and $45 per acre for soybeans. How many acres of each crop should the farmer plant if he wants to spend no more than $6,900 on labor?
Answer:
392984
Step-by-step explanation:
Chloe runs the after-school cookery club.
The group will be baking 36 scones using the following recipe.
Recipe for 12 scones:
• 250 g self-raising flour
• 60 g butter
• 30 g caster sugar
• 175 ml milk
How much milk will be used?
ml
Answer:
525 ml
Step-by-step explanation:
12 : 175 ml
36 : x
= 175 × 36
= 6300
x = 6300/12
= 525 ml
The amount of milk that is used while baking 36 scones will be 525 mL.
What are ratio and proportion?A ratio is a group of sequentially ordered numbers a and b expressed as a/b, where b is never equal to zero. When two objects are equal, a statement is said to be proportional.
Chloe runs the after-school cookery club. The group will be baking 36 scones using the following recipe.
Recipe for 12 scones:
250 g self-raising flour60 g butter30 g caster sugar175 mL milkThe amount of milk that is used while baking 36 scones will be given as,
⇒ 175 x 36 / 12
Simplify the expression, then we have
⇒ 175 x 36 / 12
⇒ 175 x 3
⇒ 525 mL
The amount of milk that is used while baking 36 scones will be 525 mL.
More about the ratio and the proportion link is given below.
https://brainly.com/question/14335762
#SPJ5
Enter the equivalent distance in km in the box.
1 km = 1000 m
1 m = 100 cm
35,000 cm =
km
Answer:
0.350 km
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi there !
35000 cm = 35000/100 m = 350 m
350 m = 350/1000 km = 0.350 km
Good luck !
More on Linear Equations & Linear Systems: Question 1
How many solutions does the system of equations below
have?
y - 2x + 2
y-r-1
Select one:
none
infinitely many
O o o o
one
two
Answer:
21
Step-by-step explanation:
Line t has a slope of 3/5 line u is perpendicular to t what is the slope of line u
Answer:
[tex]\frac{5}{3}[/tex] is the slope of the line
Step-by-step explanation:
When two lines are perpendicular, their slopes are inverse.
[tex]\frac{3}{5}[/tex] becomes [tex]\frac{5}{3}[/tex] because they are inverse. Just flip the numerator (top number) and denominator(bottom number).
Hope this helps!
please help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
By solving (x+6)(x-9), we get x^2 - 3x - 54. By looking at our y-intercept, we can see that only option A has the correct intercept.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
2. I mark as brainliest
Answer:
3.55 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
You add the mileage of the two trails which is 1.75+1.8=3.55 miles
A vaccine is 95 percent effective. What is the probability that it is not effective for more than 1 out of 20 individuals?
Answer:
The probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than 1 of the 20 individuals is equal to:
P = 1 - P(1) - P(0)
Where:
P(1) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in one individual
P(0) = probability that the vaccine is not effective in 0 individuals.
The probability that the vaccine is effective is 0.95
Then the probability that the vaccine is not effective is 0.05.
Then to calculate P(1), suppose that the vaccine is not effective in the first case and then is effective 19 times, this is:
p(1) = (0.05^1)*(0.95^19)
But this only for one case, we have 20 possible permutations (the vaccine is not effective in the first case, the second case, third case, etc)
Then the actual probability is:
P(1) = 20*((0.05^1)*(0.95^19)) = 0.377
And P(0) is easy to compute:
P(0) = (0.05^0)*(0.95^20) = 0.358
And here we have only one possible permutation, so we do not worry about that.
Then P = 1 - P(1) - P(0) = 1 - 0.377 - 0.358 = 0.265
This means that the probability that the vaccine is not effective in more than one individual is of 0.265 (or 26.5% in percentage form)
1 3 Divide - 2 +7=Explain each step you used to find the quotient. 9 5 What is the first step in finding this quotient? Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer box to complete your choice. (Type an integer or a fraction. Use a comma to separate answers as needed.) O A. Multiply the whole parts of the mixed numbers. The product is OB. Multiply the fraction parts of the mixed numbers. The product is OC. Convert the mixed numbers to fractions. The fractions are OD. Find the reciprocal of the dividend. The reciprocal is
Answer: 15 an ummm fine
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
15 is the correct answer
PLZ HURRY IT'S URGENT!!!
What is the slope of the line?
y=3
options:
0
1
3
undefined
Answer:
0
There is no x or number with an x (example: y= 2x+3, the 2 would be the slope)
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
fplzz ans my question
factorize p^4+4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(p²)²+2²
(p²+2)²-2p²2
(p²+2)²-4p²
(p²+2)²-(2p)²
(p²+2-2p)(p²+2+2p)
Text a friend and write a clear set of instructions on how to find a ratios amount
Answer:
Hi ___
A ratio is created from two numbers it can also be a fraction.
To find a ratio you have to have 2 numbers
You can take these 2 numbers and divide them so they are a unit ratio
For example 3:6 can be reduced to 1:3
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps please give brainliest
Suppose that you roll a die 8 times. What is the probability that you roll a six three or fewer times
Answer:
0.96
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the a die is rolled 8 number of times.
[tex]n[/tex] = 8
Probability of getting a 6 on roll of a die, [tex]p=\frac{1}{6}[/tex]
Probability of not getting a 6 on roll of a die, [tex]q=1-p=1-\frac{1}{6}=\frac{5}{6}[/tex]
Probability of getting 6 three or fewer times:
[tex]P(r \le 3)=P(r=0)+P(r=1)+P(r=2)+P(r=3)[/tex]
Formula:
[tex]P(r=k)=_nC_k.p^k.q^{n-k}[/tex]
Putting the values using this formula:
[tex]P(r \le 3)=_8C_0.\frac{1}{6}^0.\frac{5}{6}^{8-0}+_8C_1.\frac{1}{6}^1.\frac{5}{6}^{8-1}+_8C_2.\frac{1}{6}^2.\frac{5}{6}^{8-2}+_8C_3.\frac{1}{6}^3.\frac{5}{6}^{8-3}\\\Rightarrow P(r \le 3)=1.\frac{5}{6}^{8}+8.\frac{1}{6}.\frac{5}{6}^{7}+28.\frac{1}{36}^2.\frac{5}{6}^{6}+56.\frac{1}{216}.\frac{5}{6}^{5}\\\Rightarrow P(r \le 3)=0.23+0.37+0.26+0.1=\bold{0.96}[/tex]
what is the rate of change for the liner relationship modeled in the table?
i'm sorry wheres the picture?
¾ divid ⅖=n
Pleas answer i need a answer
help ASAP. Which relation is a function?
Answer:
Answer choice on the top right.
Step-by-step explanation:
A function of points can not share the same x value.
sub to astronaut gaming i have 27 or 28 subs if you need help finding i will help
Linearize the data. Then find the least squares regression equation
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
A florist must make 5 identical
bridesmaid bouquets for a wedding. The budget is
$160, and each bouquet must have 12 flowers. Roses
cost $2.50 each, lilies cost $4 each, and irises cost
$2 each. The florist wants twice as many roses as the
other two types of flowers combined.
Answer:
A. 40x + 10y + 10z = $160
B. 8 Roses, 2 lilies and 2 irises
C.
1. 20x + 5y + 5z = $80
2. 4x + y + z = $16
3. 8x + 2y + 2z = $32
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost for each flower = $160/5 = $32
So we have $32 for each bouquet consisting of 12 flowers each.
Roses = x = $2.50 each
lilies = y = $4 each
irises = z = $2 each
8x + 2y + 2z = $32
8($2.50) + 2($4) + 2($2) = $32
$20 + $8 + $4 = $32
$32 = $32
a. Maximum budget is $160
40x + 10y + 10z = $160
40($2.50) + 10($4) + 10($2) = $160
$100 + $40 + $20 = $160
$160 = $160
b. From above
8x + 2y + 2z = $32
8 Roses, 2 lilies and 2 irises
c. No. There are other solutions If total cost is not limited
1. 20x + 5y + 5z
20($2.50) + 5($4) + 5($2)
$50 + $20 + $10
= $80
2. 4x + y + z
4($2.50) + $4 + $2
$10 + $4 + $2
= $16
3. 8x + 2y + 2z
8($2.50) + 2($4) + 2($2)
$20 + $8 + $4
= $32
last year, emilia went bowling several times and earned an average score of 100 points. this year, after taking a class at school, her average is now 98% higher. what is her current average?
help please!!
For the following situation, identify the explanatory and response variable. Then discuss what reservations (think cautions) you might have about the results of the experiment. Asking “What if…” type questions may help.
Do the high, centered brake lights (which have been required on all U.S. cars since 1986) really reduce the frequency of rear-end collisions? Randomized comparative experiments with fleets of rental and business cars, done before the lights were required, showed that the third brake light reduced rear-end collisions by as much as 50%. After the lights were required the drop was only 5%.
The experiment is messed up. Business and rental drivers are usually much more careful in their driving patterns because the car isn't theirs. They are usually adults, experienced drivers who don't put themselves into risky driving situations. = Speeding, cutting off others etc.. It also didn't tell how much the cars were driven. There may have been a down turn in the economy and thus less business driving and same with the rentals. If they were used less after the installation then the study wasn't really valid. What was the price of gas before and after the instillation. Who did the study? Did the previous testers have any reason to skew the study? Did they own stock in the third light business? Was it the same people who did the study before who did the study afterwords? What was the average age of the drivers before and after? The study group may have aged and calmed down a bit more? What were the technology changes that occurred about the same time? Anti skid brakes, better material and tread designs for the tires, what about the design of the gages and their lighting. How about the window styles and size..larger windows mean better view and potentially less accidents. What were the safety aspects of the cars before compared to the cars after, were they the same makes and Models or did the rental and business learn that certain cars were safer than others and move to the safer Models? so many variables to consider but did the tester consider them all-probably not. Random studies study only a certain percentage of the total. Who's to say the second random study didn't get less experienced drivers to study? All good what ifs'.
show that: (1-sin x)/(cos x)=(sec x - tan x)
This is the step-by-step explanation
1. Emma’s average in math increased from an 80 to an 84. By what percentage did her average increase?
Answer:
82
Step-by-step explanation:
Define the following terms:
A system of equations is shown:
2x = -y + 6
--4x + 3y = 8
What is the solution to this system of equations?
0 (-1,-4)
O (1.4)
(4, 1)
(-4,-1)
[tex]\large\underline{\bf \red{Step \:by\: Step \:Explanation:}}[/tex]
Given two equations are :
2x = - y + 6.-4 x + 3y = 8 .We may write them as ,
2x + y - 6 = 0 .................(i) 4x - 3y + 8 = 0 ...............(ii)Multiplying equⁿ (i) by 2 :
⇒ 2(2x + y - 6 ) = 0.
⇒ 4x + 2y - 12 = 0 .....................(iii) .
Subtract equⁿ (ii) from equⁿ (iii) :-
⇒ 4x + 2y - 12 = 0
ㅤ- 4x + 3y - 8 = 0 [ Sign changes ]
__________________
⇒ 5y - 20 = 0.ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
⇒ 5y = 20.
⇒ y = 20/5.
⇒ y = 4
Put this value in (i) to obtain x .
⇒ 2x + y - 6 = 0.
⇒ 2x +4 - 6 = 0.
⇒ 2x - 2 = 0.
⇒2x = 2 .
⇒ x = 2/2.
⇒ x = 1 .
Hence the value of x is 1 & y is 4.
[tex]\boxed{\purple{\bf\pink{\dag}\:Hence\:the\: correct\: option\:is\:[b]\:(1,4)}}[/tex]
please help meeeeeeeeeeeeee
Review the proof of de Moivre’s theorem (not in order).
Proof of de Moivre's Theorem
[cos(θ) + isin(θ)]k + 1
A = [cos(θ) + isin(θ)]k ∙ [cos(θ) + isin(θ)]1
B = cos(kθ + θ) + isin(kθ + θ)
C = cos(kθ)cos(θ) − sin(kθ)sin(θ) + i[sin(kθ)cos(θ) + cos(kθ)sin(θ)]
D = [cos(kθ) + isin(kθ)] ∙ [cos(θ) + isin(θ)]
E = cos[(k + 1)θ] + isin[(k + 1)θ]
Which steps must be switched to put the proof in order?
steps B and C
steps B and D
steps C and D
steps C and E
Answer:
steps B and D
Step-by-step explanation:
the correct chart is below :)
The steps which must be switched to put the proof in order are steps B and D
Since [cos(θ) + isin(θ)]k + 1
= [cos(θ) + isin(θ)]k ∙ [cos(θ) + isin(θ)]1
= [cos(kθ) + isin(kθ)] ∙ [cos(θ) + isin(θ)]
= cos(kθ)cos(θ) − sin(kθ)sin(θ) + i[sin(kθ)cos(θ) + cos(kθ)sin(θ)]
= cos(kθ + θ) + isin(kθ + θ)
= cos[(k + 1)θ] + isin[(k + 1)θ]
Since the step after A is [cos(kθ) + isin(kθ)] ∙ [cos(θ) + isin(θ)] = D, and the step after C is cos(kθ + θ) + isin(kθ + θ) = B.
So, steps B and D must be switched.
The steps which must be switched to put the proof in order are steps B and D.
Learn more about De Moivre's theorem here:
https://brainly.com/question/11889817