Question 12 of 25
How does the relationship between the federal government and state
governments differ from the relationship between state and local
governments?
A. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments gives one type of government more power than the
other.
B. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution
c. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments can produce conflict between the two sides.
• D. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments involves sharing some responsibilities.

In the case study of Moon v St Thomas Hospital, the following actions by the nurse contributed to the nursing malpractice award:

Failure to use aseptic technique. The nurse failed to use aseptic technique while carrying out the procedures, which led to the patient's infection.

Failure to manage a high-risk patient. The patient was at high risk for developing bedsores, but the nurse failed to take adequate measures to prevent the development of bedsores.

Failure to document appropriately. The nurse failed to document the patient's condition and the procedures carried out, which is a violation of the standard of care.

Failure to monitor the patient's condition. The nurse failed to monitor the patient's condition, which led to a delay in recognizing the patient's deteriorating condition and providing timely intervention.

All of these actions contributed to the nursing malpractice award in the case study of Moon v St Thomas Hospital.

To know more about malpractice, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28104118#

#SPJ11

Criminal law is a set of laws related to a crime. Nobody will be prosecuted as no law law states that a foreigner must be saved.

Abe, the father of a drowning child, has a legal and moral obligation to try to save his child's life if he can do so without harm. However, he could be charged with manslaughter, If he decides to act.

Christie is presently in-charge. However, she could be charged with murder; If not, she could be charged with manslaughter or manslaughter, If he intended to kill the girl.

Chin doesn't appear to have committed any crimes. Hannah may have a moral obligation to act because she can probably save a drowning girl without putting herself in peril, but in utmost countries there's no legal obligation to save a foreigner.

-Felonious law prescribes behavior considered hanging , dangerous or else hanging the property, health, safety and moral security of people, including himself.

Question:

Abe takes his son Jill and his musketeers Christie and Chin to the lake. While stomping onto the wharf, Christie Chin deliberately bumps into Jill, knocking her into the water. Jill lands awkwardly and sinks to the ground. Chin pushes Christie down, ignoring the temblors. Hannah, an bystander and swimming expert, gapes at Christie but does nothing differently. Abe confronts the group and asks them to do something. However, will any of the substantiations be fulfilled? Should any of them be held responsible? explain your answer.

To know more about Criminal Law,

brainly.com/question/30000330

#SPJ4

The excuses found in the Texas Penal Code that require the defendant to prove their excuse by the preponderance of the evidence are known as affirmative defenses.

This means that the accused must prove their defense is true in order to gain an acquittal at trial. To meet this burden of proof, the accused must present evidence that supports their claim that they acted in accordance with the statutory excuse.

This evidence could include expert testimony, documentary evidence, or witness testimony. By presenting this evidence, the accused is attempting to show that it is more likely than not that the statutory excuse is true.

To know more about  affirmative defenses click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28554010#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

In California, the statute of limitations for bringing a court foreclosure action to enforce a mechanic's lien is typically 90 days from the date the mechanic's lien was recorded. This time period is established by California Civil Code section 8460.

However, it's worth noting that there are several factors that can affect the statute of limitations for enforcing a mechanic's lien in California, including the type of construction project, the date the work was completed, and the date the mechanic's lien was recorded. Therefore, it's important to consult with an attorney to determine the specific statute of limitations that applies in a particular case.

Regarding the statute of limitations for bringing an action for removal of encroachments in California, the time period varies depending on the specific circumstances of the case. The general statute of limitations for bringing an action for trespass or nuisance is three years from the date the cause of action accrues, as established by California Code of Civil Procedure section 338. However, there may be other factors that affect the statute of limitations in a particular case, such as the nature of the encroachment, the duration of the encroachment, and the type of relief sought. Therefore, it's important to consult with an attorney to determine the specific statute of limitations that applies in a particular case.

The statute of limitations in California for filing a foreclosure to enforce a mechanic's lien is 90 days from the time a mechanic's lien notice is filed. If the notice is not filed, the time limit for filing a foreclosure action is 60 days from the time the work was done.

On the other hand, in California, the statute of limitations for bringing an action for removal of encroachments is 5 years. This means that if a person is being dispossessed of their property through an encroachment, they have a 5-year time limit to bring a legal action to recover their property.

It is important to keep in mind that statute of limitations periods may vary depending on the case and the specific situation. It is advisable to consult with an attorney specializing in the relevant area to determine the time limits applicable in each particular case.

Lear More About The statute of limitations in California

https://brainly.com/question/29307980

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

To ensure a smooth transfer, the outgoing Incident Command should provide a "transfer of command briefing" to the new Incident Command. This briefing should include all relevant information about the incident, including the current status, objectives, and action plans, as well as any important documentation or records. The briefing should also cover any issues or concerns that the outgoing Incident Command faced during their tenure and provide recommendations for the incoming Incident Command. This transfer of command briefing is critical to ensure that the new Incident Command has a complete understanding of the incident and can effectively take over command responsibilities without any interruption to the response effort.

Answer:

Explanation:

The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:

"Proximate cause is established when the defendant's conduct was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's harm, and when the harm was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct."

This statement encapsulates the two main elements of proximate cause: causation and foreseeability. Causation requires that the defendant's actions were a substantial factor in causing the harm suffered by the plaintiff, while foreseeability requires that the harm suffered by the plaintiff was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's conduct.

Together, these elements help to establish whether the defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.

The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is the "but-for" test. This test determines whether, "but for" the defendant's actions, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred.

The "but-for" test is a legal standard used to determine whether a defendant's actions caused the plaintiff's injuries. To satisfy the test, it must be established that, "but for" the defendant's actions, the plaintiff's injuries would not have occurred. In other words, the defendant's actions must be the direct, proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. This is often established by proving that the plaintiff's injuries were reasonably foreseeable to the defendant at the time of their actions. This standard must be met in order for a plaintiff to successfully recover damages from a defendant. Overall, the "but-for" test is an essential standard used to determine if a defendant is responsible for a plaintiff's injuries.

Here you can learn more about  plaintiff's injuries https://brainly.com/question/27463491]

#SPJ11

The given statement " when it comes to homicide, statistically the perpetrator is more likely to be male and the victim is more likely to be female" is True because This statement is supported by crime data and research about 95% of homicide perpetrators worldwide are male.

Various studies have shown that men commit the majority of homicides. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), about 95% of homicide perpetrators worldwide are male. This can be attributed to various factors such as social, cultural, and biological influences that may predispose men to engage in more aggressive and violent behaviors.

On the other hand, it is also true that women are more likely to be victims of homicide, particularly in cases of intimate partner violence or domestic violence. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) about 38% of all female homicide victims globally are killed by their intimate partners, while the figure for male victims is much lower at around 6%. This illustrates that women are disproportionately affected by intimate partner violence and are more likely to be victims of homicide in these cases.

In conclusion, the statement is true that when it comes to homicide, statistically the perpetrator is more likely to be male, and the victim is more likely to be female. This pattern can be observed across different cultures and societies, suggesting a universal trend in gender differences in homicide perpetration and victimization. However, it is important to note that while these statistics provide a general overview, each case is unique and individual circumstances may vary.

To learn more about homicide here:

https://brainly.com/question/30638493#

#SPJ11

Answer:

d. the constitution breaks the power of the government up into 3 branches is an example of limited government, as it establishes checks and balances between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.

The First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism. It weakened the economic and political power of European nations and led to a shift in global power towards the United States and the Soviet Union. It also marked the end of the European colonial empires with the rise of nationalist movements in colonized countries. The war resulted in a significant loss of life and resources for European countries, which hindered their ability to maintain their colonies. Moreover, the war created political instability and economic depression, which led to anti-colonial movements in colonized countries. As a result, many European powers gradually lost their grip on their empires, paving the way for decolonization movements in the 20th century.

Answer:

The First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism, leading to a shift in power and a weakening of colonial empires. The war contributed to the eventual decolonization of several colonies, and it marked the beginning of a new era in international relations.

Explanation:

The First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism, both in terms of its scope and its character. Here are some ways in which it affected European imperialism:

Economic costs: The First World War was incredibly costly, both in terms of human lives and economic resources. European powers had to spend enormous amounts of money on weapons, ammunition, and other military supplies, which weakened their economies. This economic burden made it difficult for European powers to maintain their imperialist policies, and many of them had to scale back their overseas activities.

Political changes: The war brought about significant political changes in Europe, as several empires collapsed, and new nations emerged. The Treaty of Versailles, which ended the war, forced Germany to give up its colonies and territories, which were then divided among the Allied powers. This led to a significant shift in the balance of power, and several European powers lost their colonial possessions.

Anti-colonial sentiment: The war also sparked anti-colonial sentiment among the colonized people, who saw the war as a struggle among imperial powers. The war created an opportunity for colonized people to organize and demand greater autonomy and independence. This sentiment grew stronger after the war and eventually led to several colonies gaining independence.

Rise of the United States: The First World War also marked the rise of the United States as a global power. The US emerged from the war as a major economic power and began to assert its influence on the world stage. This weakened the position of European powers, which had previously dominated world affairs.

Overall, the First World War had a significant impact on European imperialism, leading to a shift in power and a weakening of colonial empires. The war contributed to the eventual decolonization of several colonies, and it marked the beginning of a new era in international relations.

Answer:

The way they work

Explanation:

In my opinion in tv shows in crime directors always make there be a challenge either between the detective or criminal,but they also allow you to put a criminal point of view so it gives a insight on how the people may be thinking.

Answer:

Answer choice (B)

Explanation:

The discussion about explosives in relation to an armed robbery case can be considered as irrelevant unless there is evidence or suspicion that the perpetrator(s) used explosives in the commission of the crime. Otherwise, the discussion about explosives would not have any direct connection or relevance to the armed robbery case.

Criminal law is the branch of law that regulates the behavior of individuals or groups and punishes those who violate the law. It is designed to protect society from criminal acts and punish those who commit them. Criminal law consists of a body of rules and regulations that define criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected persons, and fixes penalties and modes of treatment applicable to convicted offenders.Criminal law serves several purposes. One of the most important is to deter individuals from engaging in criminal behavior.

Criminal law punishes those who break the law by imposing fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions. This helps to prevent crime and protect society. Criminal law also serves to protect individual rights by ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and justly when accused of a crime. This includes the right to a fair trial, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Criminal law is based on the principle of individual responsibility. This means that individuals are held accountable for their actions, regardless of whether they intended to commit a crime. Criminal law also distinguishes between different types of crimes.

Know more about criminal offenses here:

https://brainly.com/question/11112199

#SPJ11

Under Texas law, defenses take a variety of forms. A type of defense that the prosecutor must disprove in establishing the elements of the crime is known as an affirmative defense.

This means that the defendant's guilt is established when the prosecutor proves beyond a reasonable doubt all the elements of the crime. The defendant must then provide evidence to support the affirmative defense.

The jury must then determine if the defendant's evidence proves their defense by a preponderance of the evidence, which is a lower standard than the prosecutor's beyond a reasonable doubt standard.

An example of an affirmative defense is self-defense. A defendant can claim that their use of force was necessary to defend themselves against harm, and the prosecutor must disprove this to establish the defendant's guilt.

Texas law defenses can be grouped into two main categories: those that negate an element of the crime, and those that are affirmative defenses. Defenses that negate an element of the crime will result in the defendant's acquittal if the prosecutor fails to prove all the elements beyond a reasonable doubt.

For example, if the defendant can prove that they did not have the requisite intent to commit the crime, then the prosecutor cannot establish the guilt of the defendant.

Another example of a negation defense is alibi. If the defendant can provide an alibi for their where abouts at the time of the crime, then the prosecutor must disprove this to establish the defendant's guilt.

In summary, affirmative defenses require the defendant to provide evidence to support their defense, while defenses that negate an element of the crime result in the defendant's acquittal if the prosecutor cannot prove all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

To know more about Texas law refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/8610964#

#SPJ11

Judges serving longer terms are more likely than judges serving shorter terms to have a greater sense of security in their jobs, so they may be less swayed by public opinion.

What do we understand by the term “judges serving longer terms”?

Long-term judges are those who serve longer terms in their offices. Such judges are more likely to be impartial and deliver justice according to their consciences rather than public sentiment.

What do you mean by “judges serving shorter terms”?

Short-term judges, on the other hand, are more likely to be swayed by public opinion, as they are still struggling to establish themselves in their roles and may feel insecure about their future prospects as judges.

What are the differences between short-term and long-term judges?

Thus, judges serving longer terms are more likely to be impartial in their decision-making, as they have a better understanding of the law, more experience, and a greater sense of job security.

For more such question on public opinion

https://brainly.com/question/29641370

#SPJ11

According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in: medical records.

HIPAA stands for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which was passed by the United States Congress. It includes a range of provisions that provide guidelines for how patient data can be protected and transmitted.

An incident report is a document used to describe an event that has happened within a healthcare facility, such as a fall. This report is important because it can provide valuable information to healthcare providers about how to prevent future accidents from occurring. Betty's incident report was created to document the circumstances surrounding her fall in the community health center.

Incident reports are not considered part of the official medical record because they are created to document safety and quality issues rather than for clinical purposes. Therefore, incident reports are usually not protected by HIPAA regulations and can be released to patients or their legal representatives upon request.

If the incident report is maintained in medical records, then it is likely to be protected by HIPAA. However, if the incident report is maintained separately from the medical records, then it is less likely to be protected from discovery by the patient or their legal representative. Therefore, the incident report is least likely to be protected from discovery if it is maintained in medical records.

For more such questions on incident report, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/29635795

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (b): the bill of rights does not apply to the states. After Engel v. Vitale (1962), the bill of rights applies to the states.

Prior to Engel v. Vitale, the bill of rights did not apply to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment, which was passed in 1868, prohibits the states from violating the rights of individuals; however, the Supreme Court had not applied the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states until 1962.

Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that state-mandated prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case established the doctrine of selective incorporation, which applies the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.  

The decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) had a huge impact on the rights of individuals in the United States. By incorporating the Bill of Rights into state law, the Supreme Court was able to protect individuals from having their rights violated by state governments. This is an important protection for citizens of the United States, as state governments.

Know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29371683

#SPJ11

Answer:

D) a more informed society is considered one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech. The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, which has helped promote the exchange of ideas and opinions, and has allowed individuals to express their views and challenge the status quo without fear of retribution. This has led to a more diverse and informed society, where a wide range of viewpoints and opinions are expressed and debated, contributing to a more robust democracy.

As per the given problem, Fran is injured in Ed’s mighty amusement park located in the state of Utopia. The state of Utopia has a state statute requiring amusement park owners to maintain their equipment under specific conditions; setting out clearly the standard of conduct, when and where it is expected, and to whom it is expected. Ed, who owns and operates Ed's mighty amusement park, located in the state of Utopia, fails to adhere to the requirements of the Utopia statute. In an effort to prove Ed breached his duty of care, Fran's best theory would be negligence.

Negligence is the legal concept used in tort law to describe a scenario in which one party is responsible for harming another person through careless or reckless behavior. Negligence is a legal concept that is used in tort law. Negligence refers to a situation in which one party is liable for harming another person as a result of careless or reckless behavior.  

A duty of care is an obligation to take reasonable measures to avoid injuring others. Ed breached his duty of care by failing to adhere to the requirements of the Utopia statute. Therefore, Fran could sue Ed under a theory of negligence.

Know more about legal concept here:

https://brainly.com/question/28755242

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Ray Kurzweil's prediction about AI is that by 2045, artificial intelligence will have surpassed human intelligence, leading to a technological singularity where machines become more intelligent than humans and technological progress accelerates at an unprecedented rate.

If Moore's law continues to be accurate for the coming decades, which is the prediction that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years, it is more likely that Kurzweil's prediction about AI will be correct. This is because Moore's law is one of the driving forces behind the development of faster and more powerful computing systems, which are a key component of artificial intelligence. As computing power continues to increase, it is likely that AI systems will become more sophisticated and capable of performing increasingly complex tasks.

However, it is worth noting that Moore's law is not the only factor influencing the development of AI, and there are other technological and social factors that could also impact the accuracy of Kurzweil's prediction. Additionally, it is important to keep in mind that while Kurzweil's prediction has been influential, it is still just one perspective among many in the field of AI research and there is ongoing debate about the potential implications of artificial intelligence.

Answer:

Explanation:

A citation to a court case typically includes several pieces of information, including the names of the parties involved in the case, the volume number of the reporter where the case is published, the name of the reporter, and the page number(s) where the case can be found within that reporter. The citation may also include the name of the court that issued the decision.

In the example citation you provided, "Galactic Bargains v. State Farm Ins., 251 U.S. 1442 (2018)," "Galactic Bargains v. State Farm Ins." refers to the names of the parties involved in the case. "251" refers to the volume number of the reporter where the case is published, and "U.S." refers to the name of the reporter (in this case, the United States Reports, which is the official reporter of U.S. Supreme Court decisions). "1442" refers to the page number(s) where the case can be found within the United States Reports. "2018" is the year in which the case was decided.

Without more information about the case, it's impossible to say what the citation indicates about the plaintiff's claim.

Answer:

Explanation:à gauche de la ligne centrale.

Jeff is liable for Ricardo's injuries under the theory of negligence per se, as he violated the state law that was designed to protect the public from dog attacks by allowing Maggie to be outside without a leash.

The theory of negligence is a legal principle that holds individuals or entities responsible for failing to act with reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to others.

To establish negligence, four elements must be proven: duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. In other words, a person or entity owed a duty to act with reasonable care, failed to do so, and that failure caused harm or injury to another person, resulting in damages that can be compensated.

Learn more about theory of negligence on:

https://brainly.com/question/30652890

#SPJ1

The criminal justice system plays a crucial role in counter-terrorism by investigating, prosecuting, and punishing individuals or groups who commit terrorist acts. It also works to prevent future terrorist attacks through intelligence gathering, surveillance, and analysis. Additionally, the criminal justice system provides support and assistance to victims of terrorism and their families. Overall, the criminal justice system plays a vital role in protecting national security and ensuring public safety.

Answer:

Expenditure approach to calculate GDP.

Explanation:

The terms represent the components of the expenditure approach used in calculating a country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

The expenditure approach sums up the total amount spent on goods and services produced within the country during a given period, typically a year.

The components of GDP using the expenditure approach are:

Consumption (C): the total spending by households on goods and services during the period.

Government spending (G): the total spending by the government on goods and services during the period.

Investment (I): the total spending on new capital equipment, buildings, and inventory by firms during the period.

Net Exports (NX): the difference between the value of exports and imports during the period.

The residual item in the expenditure approach is the difference between the total output (GDP) and the sum of the three components (C + G + I), which represents the net exports (NX).

So, the method used is the Expenditure approach to calculate GDP.

Answer: Express powers

Explanation:

Express powers powers are specifically granted to the federal government in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.

The true statement concerning discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic identity in the United States is that it still exists in various aspects of society, including education, employment, and criminal justice. The correct option is a)

In the education system, racial disparities persist in areas such as access to quality education, standardized test scores, and dropout rates. For example, minority students are more likely to attend underfunded schools, leading to limited access to essential resources and opportunities.

In the employment sector, racial discrimination can be observed through wage gaps, biased hiring practices, and limited opportunities for career advancement. Research has shown that minority applicants often face challenges in securing job interviews due to unconscious biases among employers.

The criminal justice system is also significantly affected by racial and ethnic discrimination. Statistics reveal that minorities, particularly African Americans and Hispanics, are disproportionately represented in the prison population, and they are more likely to receive harsher sentences for similar crimes compared to their white counterparts.

To address these issues, various policies and measures have been implemented, such as affirmative action programs, anti-discrimination laws, and diversity training.

However, there is still much work to be done to ensure equal opportunities and fair treatment for all individuals, regardless of their race or ethnic background.

To learn more about discrimination here:

https://brainly.com/question/1084594#

#SPJ11

Complete Question

which statement concerning discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic identity in the united states is true?

a)  it still exists in various aspects of society, including education, employment, and criminal justice.

b) different groups have had different degrees of succeed in fighting the effects of discrimination.

c) Americans under 18 years are denied many basic rights granted to those who are older.

d) older people are better organized to protect their rights that younger people.

Plea bargaining is a process in which a defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to a reduced sentence in exchange for a plea deal offered by the prosecution. This system is prevalent in the criminal justice systems of many countries, including the United States.

Proponents of plea bargaining argue that it can reduce the burden on courts and save taxpayers' money. It can also help to expedite the resolution of cases, reduce the risk of wrongful convictions, and provide closure to victims and their families.

Opponents of plea bargaining argue that it can incentivize prosecutors to seek convictions at any cost, even if it means coercing defendants into pleading guilty. It can also perpetuate systemic inequalities, as defendants who cannot afford to go to trial may feel compelled to accept a plea deal, even if they are innocent. Additionally, it can lead to disparities in sentencing, as plea deals may be offered more frequently to some defendants than others.

Learn more about bargain at:

https://brainly.com/question/13538163

#SPJ1

The method of finding cases in a legal digest are as follows: descriptive word approach.topic approach.table of cases approach.key number.

The four methods of finding cases in a legal digest are given above. A legal digest is a reference book containing summaries of case law that is used to locate cases based on their keywords or phrases. The digest is arranged by subject area or jurisdiction. All of the answer choices are appropriate methods of finding cases in a legal digest.

Locate a legal digest by browsing for the appropriate digest by topic or the jurisdiction you want to search for. Legal digests can be found in print format or electronic format. The search engines may vary depending on the format you select.

The descriptive word approach is a technique used to locate cases in a legal digest. This technique involves searching for words that match your case. For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would search for the words "medical malpractice" in the index or table of contents. It is possible to find cases that do not include the search terms.

Topic approach:The topic approach is a technique used to locate cases in a legal digest. This technique involves searching for cases by topic. For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would browse through the medical malpractice section of the legal digest.

For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would search for the name of the case in the table of cases.

The table of cases approach is helpful when you have the name of the case but not the citation.Key numberThe key number is a system used to classify cases by topic. Each topic has a key number assigned to it. This number is used to locate cases on that topic in a legal digest.

For example, if you are looking for a case on medical malpractice, you would use the key number assigned to medical malpractice cases to locate the relevant cases in the legal digest.

To know more about legal digest refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/13434743#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The correct answer is c. selective incorporation.

Explanation:

The correct answer is c. selective incorporation.

Selective incorporation is the approach that the US Supreme Court has used since the mid-1920s to determine whether the Bill of Rights applies to the states in protecting the public. Under this approach, the Court has selectively incorporated certain provisions of the Bill of Rights into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which applies to the states. The Court has determined on a case-by-case basis whether a particular provision of the Bill of Rights is "fundamental" to due process and therefore applicable to the states. This approach has allowed for the gradual expansion of individual rights and liberties at the state level, without necessarily applying the entire Bill of Rights to the states all at once.