According to the Domino Theory, if South Vietnam fell to Communism, then other countries in Southeast Asia would also fall to Communism, like a row of dominos. This was the basis for US involvement in the Vietnam War.
What was Vietnam War?The Vietnam War was a conflict that took place in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia from November 1, 1955, to April 30, 1975. The war was fought between the communist government of North Vietnam, supported by its allies, and the government of South Vietnam, supported by the United States and other anti-communist allies. The war resulted in the deaths of millions of Vietnamese civilians and soldiers, as well as thousands of U.S. military personnel. The war is often associated with controversy and protests in the United States, as many Americans opposed their country's involvement in the conflict. The war ended with the fall of Saigon and the reunification of Vietnam under communist rule.
To know more about vietnam war, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ9
why did America deploy troops to Vietnam
Answer:
The United States deployed troops to Vietnam in the mid-20th century as part of their policy of containing the spread of communism. At the time, there was a strong fear among American policymakers that communism was spreading throughout Southeast Asia, and that if the South Vietnamese government were to fall to communist forces, it would trigger a domino effect in the region, leading to the spread of communism throughout Asia. Additionally, the United States government believed that by aiding the South Vietnamese government in its fight against communist guerrillas known as the Viet Cong, it could prevent the spread of communism and promote democracy and freedom in Vietnam. These beliefs led to the gradual escalation of the conflict, with the United States deploying more and more troops to Vietnam over time.
Writing from the perspective of Davy Crockett, complete this short story about hunting bears. Remember that Crockett tended to exaggerate to make his stories more entertaining.
Your piece should be at least two paragraphs long and free of spelling and grammatical errors. It should also include at least three details describing frontier life.
The below question should be anatomized to your reading and jotting capability. For that reason, I can not write your story, but I will show you how to write it.
Originally, you should read the bear stalking story, that the question refers to. In this reading, you'll identify the tone of the story, the mood, and indeed the theme. Grounded on that and the details of the story, you should support what might be after the story is finished. That way, you will be suitable to continue the story, but you must keep rudiments like point of view, tone, mood, and theme.
Steps to write the story
>Be creative.
>Be delightful.
>Use words that have a light feeling.
> produce events in line with bear stalking.
To learn on Point of view from the link:
https://brainly.com/question/647014
#SPJ1
How did civilians in California support the American war effort?
O They built backyard camps to house enemy prisoners of war.
O They bought a new car every year to boost the American auto industry.
O They planted victory gardens to increase the nation's food supplies.
O They drove more frequently to deprive the enemy of gasoline supplies.
Help..
Answer: They planted victory gardens to increase the nation's food supplies.
Explanation: I took the test.
Japanese American Citizens League (JACL)
League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
National Congress of American Indians (NCAI)
National Urban League
Rainbow PUSH Coalition
How have these groups helped shape U.S. culture?
The Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), which was established in 1929, is the country's oldest and biggest non-profit, non-partisan Asian American group dedicated to defending the civil rights of Americans with Japanese heritage and others.
The League of United Latin American Citizens' (LULAC) objective was to what end?LULAC improves Hispanic Americans' economic status, educational attainment, political influence, housing, health, and civil rights through community-based projects carried out in more than 1,000 LULAC councils around the nation. The organization serves and has representation from all Hispanic nationality groups.
What does the NAACP want to achieve?Ending racial discrimination and ensuring the political, educational, and equality of minority group citizens in States are the objectives of the NAACP. The NAACP seeks to remove all barriers brought on by racial prejudice through democratic means.
The National Congress of American Indians has what objectives?The National Congress of American Indians is an organization that defends the rights of American Indians and Alaska Native people. It was founded in 1944 to speak for the tribes and oppose efforts by the federal government to revoke tribal authority and assimilate its people.
The National Urban League fulfilled what function?In order to enable African Americans and other members of disadvantaged communities to realize their full potential, they should have access to economic independence, parity, power, and civil rights.
What was the goal of the Rainbow Coalition?The first rainbow coalition in the United States sought to bring together poor people of many races and creeds, and one of its main goals was to mobilize voters.
Learn more about National Congress of American Indians: https://brainly.com/question/28202861
#SPJ1
Define grain requisition
Answer: ground
Explanation: sciene
1.By the end of World War I, the Triple Entente had evolved to become known as ________ and the Triple Alliance had become ________.
the Axis; the Allies
the Central Powers; the Allies
the Allies; the Central Powers
the Nationalists; the Communists
2.What was the main reason for Russia's support of Serbia?
A long-standing alliance with Austria-Hungary
A shared Catholic faith
A treaty for a Black Sea port
A common Slavic identity
3.What were the nations of the Triple Entente?
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy
Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia
France, Great Britain, and Italy
France, Russia, and Great Britain
4.What country is faulted for giving Austria-Hungary a "blank check" of unconditional support before the beginning of World War I?
Germany
Bulgaria
Russia
Serbia
5.What two countries were competing heavily with each other for naval superiority before World War I?
Germany and the United Kingdom
United Kingdom and France
United States and Germany
Russia and Germany
6.What was the immediate cause of American entry into World War I?
The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand
The overthrow of the czar of Russia
A series of provocations from the Germans
The Battle of the Somme
7.What did Russia do that provoked German aggression at the beginning of World War I?
Attempted to export communism into Germany
Fully mobilized of its troops on Germany's border
Bombed Prussia with no warning
Conspired with Serbia to have Franz Ferdinand assassinated
8.The Schlieffen Plan broadly called for what?
Preventing American entry into the war at all costs
Ignoring Russia and France and focusing on the United Kingdom
Providing essential support to the Ottoman Empire
Taking France out quickly and then focusing on Russia
9.Which of the following was a major problem for the German economy in the 1920s?
An oversized military not contributing to real output
Enormous payments to France and England for World War I
Unsound policies from the National Socialist government
The unhelpful Dawes Plan
10.What form of payment did the Allies prefer for German war reparations?
Indentured labor
Inexpensive consumer products
Foreign securities like U.S. Treasury notes
Grain and other agricultural commodities
11.Which country was most able to benefit from a legacy of empire to soften the effects of the Great Depression?
France
Germany
United Kingdom
United States
12.Benito Mussolini's ideology of fascism emphasized what above all?
The health and power of the state to be able to address problems
Natural rights that all citizens should enjoy
The goal of equitable treatment for all
Placing honor above national self-interest
13.What event most directly led to Adolf Hitler's rise in political power?
World War I
Russian Revolution
Spanish Civil War
Great Depression
14.Which of the following accurately describes Adolf Hitler's political power in Germany in 1923?
Strong and rising
At a high point that he would never again achieve
Almost nonexistent after a failed play for power
Ceremonial but with no real authority
15.Vladimir Lenin's policy of allowing some market activity to help the Soviet economy while maintaining state control to enforce cooperation was known as
revisionist Marxism
Trotskyism
the Five-Year Plan
the New Economic Policy
16.What was the most common trait of those targeted by the Soviet government under Stalin?
They opposed communist theory.
They wanted to revise pure communism in some way.
They had provided support to the Germans during World War I.
They threatened Stalin's power in some way.
1.The Allies; the Central Powers
2.A common Slavic identity
3.France, Russia, and Great Britain
4.Germany
5.Germany and the United Kingdom
6.A series of provocations from the Germans
7.Fully mobilized its troops on Germany's border
8.Taking France out quickly and then focusing on Russia
9.Enormous payments to France and England for World War I
10.Foreign securities like U.S. Treasury notes
11.United Kingdom
12.The health and power of the state to be able to address problems
13.Great Depression
14.Almost nonexistent after a failed play for power
15.The New Economic Policy
16.They threatened Stalin's power in some way.
Answer:1,the Allies; the Central Powers
2, common Slavic identity
3, France, Russia, and Great Britain
4, Germany
5, Germany and the United Kingdom
6, The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand
7, Fully mobilized its troops on Germany's border
8, Taking France out quickly and then focusing on Russia
9. An oversized military not contributing to real output
10. Indentured labor
11. United Kingdom
12. The health and power of the state to be able to address problems.
13. World War I
14. Almost nonexistent after a failed play for power
15. the New Economic Policy
16. They threatened Stalin's power in some way.
Renting land from a landowner in return for a share of the crop is called
.
Renting land from a landowner in return for a share of the crop is called "sharecropping".
What is Sharecropping?
Sharecropping is an agricultural system where a tenant farmer rents a piece of land from a landowner and agrees to give the landowner a share of the crops produced in exchange for the use of the land.
This system was widely used in the United States and other countries in the past, particularly after the Civil War.
Sharecropping allowed people who did not own land to farm and make a living, but often resulted in the tenant farmer being trapped in a cycle of debt and poverty due to high interest rates and other unfair practices.
To know more about crop related questions, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/801194
#SPJ1
The belief that large inequalities in society were immoral and that individuals
should help others in need became known as:
A. social capitalism.
B. social Darwinism.
C. social reform.
D. Social Gospel.
Answer:
D. Social Gospel.
Explanation:
The Social Gospel was a movement that emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States. It was a Christian movement that emphasized the importance of addressing social problems such as poverty, inequality, and injustice. Its proponents believed that large inequalities in society were immoral and that individuals had a responsibility to help those in need. They saw Christianity as a way to promote social justice and equality.
Social capitalism is a concept that combines elements of capitalism and socialism. Social Darwinism is a belief that the human species evolves through natural selection and survival of the fittest. Social reform is a movement that aims to improve social conditions through political and social change.
Confederate forces led by General Forrest capture a fort and murder Black
soldiers serving there, rather than accept their surrender, during the:
O A. Fort Pillow Massacre.
B. March to the Sea.
O C. capture of Atlanta.
D. Battle of Mobile Bay.
Answer: A. Fort Pillow Massacre.
Explanation: During the Fort Pillow Massacre, Confederate forces led by General Forrest captured a fort and killed Black soldiers who were serving there, instead of accepting their surrender. This incident took place during the American Civil War on April 12, 1864.
The Fort Pillow Massacre was a controversial and tragic event. After the Confederate forces captured the fort, they brutally killed many of the Union soldiers, including Black soldiers, who were defending the fort. The exact number of casualties is disputed, but it is estimated that around 300 Union soldiers were killed.
The massacre at Fort Pillow highlighted the racial tensions and animosity during the Civil War. It was also one of the incidents that fueled debates and discussions about the treatment of Black soldiers and prisoners of war.
Learn more about the Fort Pillow Massacre here: https://brainly.com/question/15171736.
Please I'm begging please respond and pick one I'll Give brainly I'm timed Based on the map, which statement best describes the French and British colonies in Africa? Both French and British colonies were blocked from ocean trade routes by Spanish and Portuguese colonies. Neither French colonies nor British colonies covered as much land as German colonies. The French colonies were mainly in West Africa, while British colonies were in Southern and Northeastern Africa. Great Britain controlled much of Central Africa, which was surrounded by French colonies.
Answer:
The French colonies were mainly in West Africa, while British colonies were in Southern and Northeastern Africa.
Explanation:
Answer: The French colonies were mainly in West Africa, while British colonies were in Southern and Northeastern Africa.
Explanation:
I got it right on my quiz
have a good day
Which statement correctly compares and contrasts the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Hamas?
A.
Although the PLO and Hamas are both opponents of Israel, the PLO wants to eliminate Israel, while Hamas members have been elected to the parliament.
B.
Although the PLO and Hamas are both in conflict with Israel, the PLO has recognized Israel's right to exist, while Hamas wants to eliminate Israel.
C.
Although the PLO and Hamas are both considered to be activist groups, the PLO is located in Egypt, and Hamas is located in Syria.
D.
Although Hamas and the PLO both want a peaceful resolution to conflict, Hamas is in favor of West Bank settlements, while the PLO is against them.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP
The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Hamas are properly contrasted and compared in Whilst both the PLO and Hamas are hostile to Israel, the PLO has acknowledged Israel's right to exist while Hamas seeks Israel's eradication.
What is Palestine Liberation Organization?In order to create Arab unity and statehood over the region of former Mandatory Palestine in opposition to the State of Israel, the Palestine Liberation Organization was founded in 1964. It is a Palestinian nationalist political and militant organization. Although the United States does not recognize the State of Palestine, it does recognize the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. After the Oslo Accords, it also recognized the Palestinian National Authority as the legitimate Palestinian government of the Palestinians. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), also known as Muna'amat al-Ta'rr Filasniyyah in Arabic, is an umbrella political organization that claims to speak for all Palestinians around the world, including all Arabs and their descendants who resided in Palestine under British Mandate before the establishment of the State of Israel there in 1948.To learn more about Palestine Liberation Organization, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10664987
the Vietnam War was another example of the wars of decolonization in the 20th century.
True
False
Answer:
The Vietnam War was a war of decolonization because it was a fight between the Vietnamese people and foreign colonial powers to gain independence for Vietnam. Vietnam was ruled by France for most of the 20th century. France was a colonial power that took control of the country by force and coercion. Around the middle of the 20th century, Vietnamese nationalist groups began to form. They wanted to get rid of French colonial rule and make Vietnam a free country.
The Vietnamese finally beat the French in 1954, but the country was then split into two separate states: North Vietnam, which was run by a communist government, and South Vietnam, which was run by a non-communist government backed by the United States. The United States helped the government of South Vietnam fight the communist forces of North Vietnam, which led to the Vietnam War.
So, the Vietnam War can be seen as a war of decolonization because it was a fight for independence by the Vietnamese people from France and then the United States, which were colonial powers at the time. The war was part of a larger wave of decolonization movements that happened all over the world in the 20th century. During these movements, many countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America tried to get rid of European powers' control over them.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
There is a difference between the Indochina Wars and the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War, which was fought between North Vietnam and South Vietnam, is not a war of decolonization, though North Vietnam may argue that it is so. The war of decolonization has already been fought in the Indochina Wars, in which Vietnam defeated France and her allies (primarily the United States).
Now, you may ask, what the Vietnam War was primarily about? The Vietnam War, on the other hand, primarily was fighting to unite Vietnam under a common government (whether the communist regime of North Vietnam under H-o Chi Minh, or the parliamentary republic of South Vietnam under Ngo Dinh Diem.
Learn more about the Vietnam War, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
why is the black lives matter movement called a new civil rights movement
Answer:The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement is often referred to as a new civil rights movement because it advocates for the rights and equality of Black people in the United States, just as the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s did.
Like the Civil Rights Movement, the BLM movement seeks to address systemic racism and discrimination, particularly in law enforcement and the criminal justice system. The movement also seeks to raise awareness about the ongoing effects of slavery, segregation, and discrimination on Black communities, and to promote policies and practices that support racial justice and equity.
The BLM movement gained momentum in 2013 following the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the killing of Trayvon Martin and has since grown into a global movement with millions of supporters advocating for racial justice and the end of police brutality against Black people. The movement has been involved in protests, advocacy, and policy change efforts, similar to the strategies employed by the Civil Rights Movement. Therefore, the BLM movement is often considered a new civil rights movement.
Explanation:
How are the main points presented
in the book Slaves in the family by Edward Ball
The story of the people, both black and white, who lived and worked on the Balls' South Carolina plantations is brought to light by journalist Ball, who confronts the legacy of his family's ownership of slaves.
Did slaves belong to the Ball family?According to the Ball Family Slaveholder Index, the Ball family "owned more than twenty rice plantations in Lowcountry South Carolina and enslaved nearly 4,000 Africans and African Americans" between 1698 and 1865. Edward Ball did research that went much further than this work. He found many slaves named in records, including some who were in family photos. He has related how his Ball ancestor enslaved an African woman named Priscilla. In 1756, she was taken from the region that is now Sierra Leone and sold to Isaac Ball (or his overseer) in Charleston.
To learn more about Slaves visit :
https://brainly.com/question/16747534
#SPJ1
Now that you have learned more about GDP as a measurement, what are the positives and negatives of this economic indicator as a tool for measuring economic health? What does GDP not tell us? Why do economists use it? Use the notes that you took in Part C to explain your answer in 3-5 sentences.
The strengths of GDP are the simplicity with which it is able to measure the economic performance of different locations. The negative effects relate to the consideration of non-monetary factors to measure a country's economy.
What is GDP?It corresponds to an economic indicator used by economists to measure the economic performance of a country in a period, through the sum of all production during a period.
Therefore, the GDP demonstrates the levels of economic growth of a country during a period, but the critics argue that it alone cannot be an instrument of measurement of the economic health of a country, for not considering factors such as employment, income, education and others that demonstrate the quality of life in general.
Find out more about GDP on:
https://brainly.com/question/1383956
#SPJ1
Which of the following was a factor that contributed to the formation of the People’s Party in 1891?
The Aeneid reworks many of the themes from Homer's two epics. How do you feel the Aeneid brings something new to the table? Why does it matter if he completely (re)appropriates? How might the Aeneid participate in the construction of a Roman Empiric ideal? Does the Roman ideal appear clearly in the piece? Is it undercut?
Answer:
The Aeneid is a work that brings several new elements to the table despite heavily borrowing from Homer's epics. The most significant addition that it brings to the epic genre is its focus on Roman imperialism, which is not evident in Homer's works. Virgil's epic constructs the idea of a Roman Empire that would last for centuries, and it does this by depicting Aeneas, the epic's hero, as an ideal Roman leader.
In the Aeneid, Virgil uses Aeneas' journey from Troy to Italy to present an idealized vision of the Roman Empire. By placing Aeneas at the center of the narrative, Virgil portrays Rome as the destination of the Trojans' journey, thus linking the epic's hero with the future of the Roman Empire. Additionally, Virgil's epic emphasizes the idea of Rome's divine destiny, which is a crucial element of the Roman Empire's ideology. This is evident when the gods and goddesses of the Greco-Roman pantheon intervene in Aeneas' journey, steering him towards Italy, where he will eventually found Rome.
Furthermore, the Aeneid also critiques the Roman ideal, with the character of Dido being a prime example. Dido represents the Phoenician city of Carthage, which was a powerful rival of Rome. The character's portrayal in the Aeneid can be seen as a critique of the Roman Empire's values, as Dido's downfall is a result of her love for Aeneas. This portrayal may be an attempt by Virgil to highlight the dangers of imperialism and the cost that it can have on other cultures.
In conclusion, the Aeneid brings several new elements to the epic genre, most notably the focus on Roman imperialism. The epic's portrayal of Aeneas as the ideal Roman leader and Rome's divine destiny in the epic participates in the construction of a Roman Empire ideal. However, the critique of the Roman ideal, through the character of Dido, suggests that Virgil was aware of the dangers of imperialism and the need for caution in constructing an empire.
Explanation:
HELPPP
Explain how the ruling of United States v. Richard Nixon, 1973 was an example of judicial review. Which branch of government did this ruling keep in check and how did it do so?
It was on this day in 1974 that the U.S. Supreme Court dealt a fatal blow to President Richard Nixon’s presidency, in a decision that led to the release of the Watergate tapes.
The case of United States v. Nixon reached the Court on July 8, 1974, after it had concluded its prior term. The Justices found themselves in new territory as the Court had to deal with an executive privilege claim filed by President Nixon’s attorneys.
A grand jury had returned indictments against seven Nixon aides, including former Attorney General John Mitchell, as part of the Watergate investigation. Leon Jaworski, a special prosecutor appointed by President Nixon, and the seven defendants wanted access to audio tapes of conversations recorded by President Nixon in the White House.
Nixon argued that the concept of executive privilege gave him the power to withhold sensitive information, such as tapes, from other government branches in order to maintain confidential communications within the executive branch and to secure the national interest.
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Court (with Justice Rehnquist not taking part due to a prior role in the Nixon administration) ruled against the President. Chief Justice Warren Burger said that the President didn’t have an absolute, unqualified privilege to withhold information.
“We conclude that when the ground for asserting privilege as to subpoenaed materials sought for use in a criminal trial is based only on the generalized interest in confidentiality, it cannot prevail over the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice. The generalized assertion of privilege must yield to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial,” Burger said.
As the Supreme Court drama was unfolding, the House Judiciary Committee worked on three articles of impeachment against President Nixon. The evidence on the tapes was critical to the impending House impeachment proceedings against Nixon.
The Court ordered the tapes released as soon as possible after a judge had listened to the tapes to decide they were relevant to the trial of the former Nixon aides. About two weeks after the Supreme Court’s decision, President Nixon resigned from office.
How did construction of the Panama Canal overlap with U.S. foreign policy?
President Theodore Roosevelt oversaw the realization of a long-term United States goal—a trans-isthmian canal. Throughout the 1800s, American and British leaders and businessmen wanted to ship goods quickly and cheaply between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.Roosevelt on a digging machine during construction of the Panama Canal, circa 1908. (Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division)To that end, in 1850 the United States and Great Britain negotiated the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty to rein in rivalry over a proposed canal through the Central American Republic of Nicaragua. The Anglo-American canal, however, never went beyond the planning stages. French attempts to build a canal through Panama (province of Colombia) advanced further. Led by Ferdinand de Lesseps—the builder of the Suez Canal in Egypt—the French began excavating in 1880. Malaria, yellow fever, and other tropical diseases conspired against the de Lesseps campaign and after 9 years and a loss of approximately 20,000 lives, the French attempt went bankrupt. In spite of such setbacks, American interest in a canal continued unabated. The Hay-Pauncefote Treaty of 1901 abrogated the earlier Clayton-Bulwer Treaty and licensed the United States to build and manage its own canal. Following heated debate over the location of the proposed canal, on June 19, 1902, the U.S. Senate voted in favor of building the canal through Panama. Within 6 months, Secretary of State John Hay signed a treaty with Colombian Foreign Minister Tomás Herrán to build the new canal. The financial terms were unacceptable to Colombia’s congress, and it rejected the offer.President Roosevelt responded by dispatching U.S. warships to Panama City (on the Pacific) and Colón (on the Atlantic) in support of Panamanian independence. Colombian troops were unable to negotiate the jungles of the Darien Strait and Panama declared independence on November 3, 1903. The newly declared Republic of Panama immediately named Philippe Bunau-Varilla (a French engineer who had been involved in the earlier de Lesseps canal attempt) as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary. In his new role, Bunau-Varilla negotiated the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty of 1903, which provided the United States with a 10-mile wide strip of land for the canal, a one-time $10 million payment to Panama, and an annual annuity of $250,000. The United States also agreed to guarantee the independence of Panama. Completed in 1914, the Panama Canal symbolized U.S. technological prowess and economic power. Although U.S. control of the canal eventually became an irritant to U.S.-Panamanian relations, at the time it was heralded as a major foreign policy achievement.
What was the advantage of assembly lines?
Production was significantly accelerated by the assembly line. It made it possible for companies to produce goods at an impressive rate while also managing to cut down on the amount of labor required to create a product, which benefited many of the employees who had previously had to put in 10 to 12 hours a day at work to reach production targets.
What is meant by assembly lines?A manufacturing process known as an assembly line involves adding pieces sequentially as the partially completed assembly passes from workstation to workstation, producing the final assembly. Robotic employees can make up an assembly line as a fast way to produce large quantities of things. The assembly of complicated products like automobiles or transportation equipment, home appliances, and technological goods are typical examples of assembly lines in use.Individual components of a bigger product are assembled in a specified order on an assembly line throughout the manufacturing process. Currently, computers or robots are typically used to carry out this operation, although in the past, it was done by hand. The manufacturing process was greatly accelerated by the assembly line.To learn more about assembly lines, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/26948522
What ended before 1990
Answer:
There are many things that ended before 1990. Here are some notable examples:
World War II - The war ended in 1945 with the surrender of Germany and Japan.
Cold War - The political tension between the United States and the Soviet Union ended in 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Apartheid - The system of racial segregation and discrimination in South Africa ended in 1990 with the release of Nelson Mandela from prison and the subsequent dismantling of the apartheid system.
Berlin Wall - The physical barrier that divided Berlin, Germany, was torn down in 1989, symbolizing the end of the Cold War.
Space Race - The competition between the United States and the Soviet Union to explore space ended in 1975 with the joint Apollo-Soyuz mission.
Vietnam War - The war ended in 1975 with the fall of Saigon and the unification of North and South Vietnam.
Soviet-Afghan War - The war ended in 1989 with the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan.
These are just a few examples, and there are many other significant events that ended before 1990.
Explanation:
Consider the role of money in modern elections as you answer the following:
Need help ASAP
In 2–3 sentences, describe a number of past efforts to change campaign finance methods.
In 2–3 sentences, identify the strengths and weaknesses of these campaign finance reform efforts.
In a paragraph, explain additional possible reforms you would propose to resolve the continuing problems in campaign finance law.
How did Hoover win his party's nomination to run again in 1932?
He was the incumbent, and the best-known Republican candidate.
He had taken responsibility for the Bonus Army attack.
He introduced a powerful new plan to end the Depression.
He warned the convention that only he had the experience to lead.
Answer:
He was the incumbent, and the best-known Republican candidate.
Explanation:
Hoover won his party's nomination to run again in 1932 as the incumbent and the best-known Republican candidate. Despite his unpopularity due to the Great Depression, many Republicans believed that Hoover had the necessary experience to lead the country through the crisis. However, his nomination was not without controversy. Some members of the party were dissatisfied with Hoover's handling of the Depression and the Bonus Army attack, which had led to violent clashes between veterans and the military. Nevertheless, Hoover was able to secure the nomination and face off against Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt in the general election.
is the most northern New England state.
Answer: Maine is the most northern New England state.
Pilgrims Preparation
for coming to the colonies
Pilgrims who were preparing to come to the colonies in the early 17th century faced many challenges.
What challenges did the pilgrims face?They needed to ensure they had enough food and supplies for the long journey and the harsh winter conditions they would face upon arrival.
They also had to make arrangements for transportation, typically by ship, and secure funding for their travel.
Additionally, they had to prepare themselves spiritually and emotionally for the journey, as they were leaving behind their homes and families for an uncertain future in a new land.
Overall, the preparation required both practical and emotional readiness to embark on this challenging and risky journey.
Read more about pilgrims here:
https://brainly.com/question/13176282
#SPJ1
Executive Order 9066 violated rights for people of Japanese ancestry. Which constitutional rights were violated with this policy? Do you think upholding these rights is more important than national security? Why or why not?
Answer:j
Explanation:
Why had the founding fathers created such a weak federal structure in the articles of confederation
The Founders were concerned that a centralized government with excessive power may become tyrannical.
Why was the central administration under the Articles of Confederation so feeble?The Founding Fathers selected this system of power sharing because they were concerned about the American colonies' distrust of powerful national governments. After dealing with the British Crown for so long, the American colonies did not want to set up another another antiquated, national government.
Keeping the power of the nation and the state in check: The states received the lion's share of power under the national governing system created by the Articles of Confederation. The nation's founders thought that giving a centralized government too much power would make it tyrannical.
The central government was unable to levy taxes in order to cover operating costs. The federal government's receipt of voluntary tax payments from the states was essential to the Confederation. A paucity of resources prevented the central government from maintaining an effective military or its own paper money.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation: https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ1
Unlike women in the North, women in the South during the Civil War often
Unlike women in the North, Women in the South during the Civil War often ran plantations.
What was Women role in the South during the Civil War?Because most of the men in the South had gone off to fight the Civil War, women had to take over some of their duties. One such duty that was taken over was that of running the plantations to ensure that production remained steady.
They alos provided uniforms, blankets, sandbags and other supplies for entire regiments. They wrote letters to soldiers and worked as untrained nurses in makeshift hospitals. They even cared for wounded soldiers in their homes.
Read more about Civil War
brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ1
Which statement best describes the effect of the automobile during the 1920s?
• A. Mass production of automobiles gave people less leisure time because they had to repair cars.
• B. Mass production of automobiles allowed more Americans to afford them, so people could move around more easily.
• C. Mass production of automobiles meant that only the wealthy could afford to purchase them
• D. Mass production of automobiles meant that many more
Americans bought them, which made driving on roads difficult.
Answer:
I would say B
Explanation:
The whole reason that mass production was invented was to create more products at a lower cost. This meant that the average person could buy a car.
1. What is happening in the in the Ottoman Empire in 1915?
2. Where is Armenia in 1915? Where are these incidents happening?
3. When do the incidents occur?
4. Why are these incidents occurring?
Answer:
1. In 1915, the Ottoman Empire was engaged in World War I and undergoing political and social changes in the midst of the conflict.
2. Armenia was a part of the Ottoman Empire in 1915, and the incidents related to the Armenian Genocide were primarily happening within the borders of the empire, particularly in Anatolia.
3. The incidents that led to the Armenian Genocide occurred between 1915 and 1923, with the majority of the atrocities taking place during the years 1915-1916.
4. The Armenian Genocide occurred as a result of a deliberate policy by the Ottoman government to exterminate the Armenian population. The reasons behind the policy were complex and included religious, economic, and political factors, as well as a desire to eliminate any potential threat to Ottoman power.