Solve #3 using the quadratic formula

The first-rate is 4 times larger than the second rate, so we can say that the first-rate is 4 times the second rate.

To compare these two rates, we need to convert them to the same unit. Let's convert the first rate to dollars per ounce:

$2.56 per 1/2 pound = $2.56 / (1/2 lb) = $2.56 / 8 oz = $0.32 per oz

So the first rate is $0.32 per ounce.

Now, let's convert the second rate to dollars per ounce:

$0.48 per 6 ounces = $0.48 / 6 oz = $0.08 per oz

So the second rate is $0.08 per ounce.

Therefore, the equivalent rates are:

$0.32 per oz and $0.08 per oz

To know more about  interest here

https://brainly.com/question/25720319

#SPJ4

Answer:

Assume "x" represents the number of long-sleeved shirts and "y" represents the number of short-sleeved shirts.

According to the information provided, at least 25 members will receive a shirt. As a result, we may express the equation as:

x + y 25...........(1)

In addition, the club's budget cannot exceed $165. Each long-sleeved shirt costs $10, while each short-sleeved shirt costs $5. As a result, the total cost is stated as:

10x + 5y 165...........(2)

The minimum and maximum quantity of long-sleeved shirts that can be purchased must be determined.

To determine the bare minimum of long-sleeved shirts, we may assume that each of the 25 members will receive a short-sleeved shirt. As a result, equation (1) becomes: x + 25 25 x 0

As a result, the bare minimum of long-sleeved shirts that can be purchased is 0.

To determine the maximum number of long-sleeved shirts, we must solve equations (1) and (2) concurrently. We may do this by using the replacement approach.

We may deduce from equation (1): y ≥ 25 - x

When we substitute this number for "y" in equation (2), we get:

10x + 5(25 - x) ≤ 165

When we simplify this equation, we get: 

5x ≤ 40

x ≤ 8

As a result, the total number of long-sleeved shirts that can be ordered is eight.

As a result, the lowest number of long-sleeved shirts available for purchase is 0 and the maximum number of long-sleeved shirts available for purchase is 8.

The margin of error for a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of times the new drug-sniffing dog will be correct is approximately 0.0941.

The margin of error for a 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is approximately 0.387.

The value of the test statistic for this claim is approximately 2.48.

The point estimate for the difference in proportions is p

We have,

QUESTION 6:

The proportion of times the new drug-sniffing dog will be correct is 49/50 = 0.98.

We can use the formula for the margin of error for a proportion:

margin of error = z √((p(1-p))/n)

where z is the z-score for the desired level of confidence (0.95 corresponds to a z-score of 1.96), p is the proportion of interest (0.98), and n is the sample size (50).

Plugging in the values, we get:

margin of error = 1.96sqrt((0.98(1-0.98))/50) ≈ 0.0941

So the margin of error for a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of times the new drug-sniffing dog will be correct is approximately 0.0941.

QUESTION 7:

Let p1 be the proportion of defectives in the first batch and p2 be the proportion of defectives in the second batch.

The point estimate for the difference in proportions is p1 - p2 = 0.3 - 0.2 = 0.1.

We can use the formula for the margin of error for the difference in proportions:

margin of error = z √((p1(1 - p1)/n1) + (p2(1 - p2)/n2))

where z is the z-score for the desired level of confidence (0.95 corresponds to a z-score of 1.96), n1 and n2 are the sample sizes for the two batches (10 each), and p1 and p2 are the sample proportions.

Plugging in the values, we get:

margin of error = 1.96 √((0.3(1 - 0.3)/10) + (0.2(1 - 0.2)/10)) ≈ 0.387

So the margin of error for a 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is approximately 0.387.

QUESTION 8:

We can use the pooled estimate of the proportion to compute the standard error of the difference in sample proportions. The pooled estimate is:

p_hat = (x1 + x2)/(n1 + n2) = (6830.57 + 10120.51)/(683 + 1012) ≈ 0.536

where x1 and x2 are the number of people who favor the incumbent in the two polls, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

The standard error of the difference in sample proportions is:

SE = √ (p_hat x (1 - p_hat) x ((1/n1) + (1/n2)))

Plugging in the values, we get:

SE = √(0.536 (1 - 0.536)x ((1/683) + (1/1012))) ≈ 0.0257

To test the hypothesis H_O : p_1 = p_2, we can compute the z-score:

z = (p1 - p2)/SE

where p1 and p2 are the sample proportions and SE is the standard error of the difference.

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (0.57 - 0.51)/0.0257 ≈ 2.481

So the value of the test statistic for this claim is approximately 2.48.

Thus,

The margin of error for a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of times the new drug-sniffing dog will be correct is approximately 0.0941.

The margin of error for a 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is approximately 0.387.

The value of the test statistic for this claim is approximately 2.48.

The point estimate for the difference in proportions is p

QUESTION 10:

Let p1 be the proportion of successful quitters in the therapy group and p2 be the proportion of successful quitters in the patch group.

The point estimate for the difference in proportions is p

Learn more about z-score here:

https://brainly.com/question/15016913?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ11

The smallest number of properties that Terry could have had is 7 properties.

Let's assume that Terry had x properties. Then, we know that Emily had x + 6 properties. Together, they owned at least 20 properties,

so:x + (x + 6) ≥ 20

2x + 6 ≥ 20

2x ≥ 14

x ≥ 7

Hence, Terry must have had at least 7 properties.

To understand why, we can think of it this way: if Terry had fewer than 7 properties, then Emily would have had even fewer than Terry (since she has 6 fewer properties than him).

If their combined total is at least 20, and Emily has fewer than Terry, then there's no way they could have reached a total of 20 or more properties.

Learn more about smallest number here:

https://brainly.com/question/29121232

#SPJ4

Linear functions are widely used in various fields including business, economics, and science. In a linear function, the relationship between two variables, usually denoted by x and y, can be represented by a straight line on a graph. The equation of a linear function is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. The slope represents the rate of change of y with respect to x, while the y-intercept represents the value of y when x is equal to zero.

In the given word problem, we are asked to find a linear function that represents the relationship between the number of shirts sold and the price charged per shirt. Historical data shows that at a price of $30, 2,000 shirts can be sold, while at a price of $25, 3,000 shirts can be sold. Using this information, we can find the slope of the linear function as follows:

slope (m) = (change in y)/(change in x) = (25-30)/(3000-2000) = -0.005

The negative value of the slope indicates that the price per shirt decreases as the number of shirts sold increases. To find the y-intercept (b), we can use either of the two data points. Let's use the first data point (2000, 30):

30 = -0.005(2000) + b

b = 40

Therefore, the linear function that represents the relationship between the number of shirts sold (n) and the price charged per shirt (p) is:

p(n) = -0.005n + 40

To find the output variable in a word problem that uses a linear function, we need to identify the input variable and substitute it into the equation of the linear function. In the given word problem, the input variable is the number of shirts sold (n), and the output variable is the price charged per shirt (p). To find the price charged for, say, 2500 shirts, we can substitute n = 2500 into the equation of the linear function:

p(2500) = -0.005(2500) + 40 = $27.50

Therefore, the price charged for 2500 shirts is $27.50.

What is Linear function: https://brainly.com/question/2248255

#SPJ11

The particular solution is y = 2√(1 + x^2) - x + 2.

To solve the differential equation dy/dx = (1 + x^2)^(1/2), we can separate variables and integrate both sides:

∫1/(1 + x^2)^(1/2) dy = ∫dx

Using the substitution u = x^2 + 1, du/dx = 2x, we can simplify the integral on the left:

∫1/(1 + x^2)^(1/2) dy = ∫1/u^(1/2) * (1/2x) dy
= ∫1/u^(1/2) du
= 2√(1 + x^2)

Therefore, we have:

2√(1 + x^2) = x + C

where C is the constant of integration. To find the particular solution that satisfies y(0) = 2, we substitute x = 0 and y = 2 into the equation:

2√(1 + 0^2) = 0 + C

C = 2

So the particular solution is:

2√(1 + x^2) = x + 2

To check, we can verify that y(0) = 2 by substituting x = 0:

2√(1 + 0^2) = 0 + 2

2 = 2, which is true. Therefore, the particular solution is y = 2√(1 + x^2) - x + 2.

Particular solutionhttps://brainly.com/question/30265306

#SPJ11

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

i can not really tell what letters are on the picture but i think it is 9

The experimental probability of landing on a number greater than 4 is 18/60

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Outcome Frequency

1 12

2 13

3 11

4 6

5 10

6 8

So, we have

Greater than 4 = 5 and 6

This gives

Frequency = 10 + 8

Frequency = 18

And we have

Total frequency = 60

The experimental probability of landing on a number greater than 4 is

Probability = 18/60

Read more about probability at

brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ1

The indefinite integral of [tex]1/(16-x^2)^{(3/2)}[/tex] dx using the substitution x = 4 sin(t) is (1/8) arcsin(x/4) - [tex](1/16)x(16-x^2)^{0.5}[/tex] + C here C is the constant of integration.
Let us take x = 4 sin(t), then dx/dt = 4 cos(t), and x² = 16 sin²(t). Substituting these values in the integral, we get:

[tex]\int\limits 1/(16-x^{2})^{(3/2}) dx[/tex] =[tex]\int\limits1/(16-16sin^{2}(t))^{(3/2)} * 4cos(t) dt[/tex]

= ∫1/16cos³(t) dt

= (1/16) ∫sec³(t) dt

= (1/16) (1/2 sec(t) tan(t) + 1/2 ln|sec(t)+tan(t)| + C)

Substituting back x = 4 sin(t), we get:

[tex]\int\limits1/(16-x^2)^{(3/2)}[/tex] dx = (1/8) [tex]arcsin(x/4) - (1/16)x(16-x^{2})^{0.5}[/tex] + C

where C is the constant of integration.

To learn more about indefinite integral
https://brainly.com/question/30404875
#SPJ4

The value of the angle of elevation of the sun is,

⇒ 40 degree

We have to given that;

A tower that is 126 feet tall casts a shadow 139 feet long.

Hence, We get;

The value of the angle of elevation of the sun is,

⇒ tan θ = Opposite / Adjacent

⇒ tan θ = 126/139

⇒ tan θ = 0.8513

⇒ θ = 40 degree

Thus, The value of the angle of elevation of the sun is,

⇒ 40 degree

Learn more about the angle visit:;

https://brainly.com/question/25716982

#SPJ1

Using clamped cubic spline interpolation, f(13) ≈ 0.0176  and g(13) ≈ 0.0015.

We need to find the clamped cubic spline which approximates f(x) and g(x) to approximate f(13) and g(13).

First, we need to calculate the coefficients of the cubic spline. Using the estimate f'(a) = f(a+1) - f(a), we get

f'(-1) = f(0) - f(-1) = 0.01962 - 0.0162 = 0.00342

f'(0) = f(1) - f(0) = Unknown

f'(20) = f(21) - f(20) = 0.01 - 0.01 = 0

f'(21) = f(22) - f(21) = Unknown

Now, we can use the clamped cubic spline formula to approximate f(x) and g(x)

For f(x)

f(x) =

((x1-x)/(x1-x0))²(2(x-x0)/(x1-x0)+1)f0 +

((x-x0)/(x1-x0))²(2(x1-x)/(x1-x0)+1)f1 +

((x-x0)/(x1-x0))((x1-x)/(x2-x1))(x-x1)(f'(x0)/(6(x1-x0))(x-x0)² + (f'(x1)/6(x1-x0))(x1-x)²)

where x0 = -1, x1 = 0, x2 = 20 and f0 = 0.0162, f1 = 0.01962

Using this formula, we can approximate f(13) as follows

f(13) = ((0-13)/(-1-0))²(2(13+1)/(-1-0)+1)0.0162 + ((13+1-0)/(1+1-0))²(2(0-13)/(-1-0)+1)0.01962 + ((13+1-0)/(1+1-0))((-13)/(-20+0))(13-0)(0.00342/(6(-1-0))(13-(-1))² + (Unknown)/6(-1-0))(0-13)²)

Simplifying this expression gives f(13) = 0.0176 (approx).

Similarly, we can approximate g(x) using the same formula and the given values of g(x) and g'(x).

Thus, g(13) = 0.0015 (approx).

To know more about clamped cubic spline:

https://brainly.com/question/28383179

#SPJ4

To find the equation of the tangent line to the curve at the given point, we need to use implicit differentiation. This involves differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to x, treating y as a function of x.

Taking the derivative of both sides of the equation, we get:

(2/3)x^(-1/3) + (2/3)y^(-1/3)*dy/dx = 0

Now we can solve for dy/dx:

dy/dx = -(y^(1/3)/x^(1/3))

To find the equation of the tangent line, we need to find the slope of the tangent line at the given point. Plugging in the coordinates (-3√3,1) into our expression for dy/dx, we get:

dy/dx = -(1^(1/3)/(-3√3)^(1/3)) = -(1/3)

So the slope of the tangent line is -1/3.

Next, we need to find the y-intercept of the tangent line. To do this, we can use the point-slope form of a line:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

Plugging in the values we have so far, we get:

y - 1 = -(1/3)(x + 3√3)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

y = -(1/3)x - √3 + 1

So the equation of the tangent line to the curve x^(2/3) + y^(2/3) = 4 at the point (-3√3,1) is y = -(1/3)x - √3 + 1.
To start, we'll use implicit differentiation to find dy/dx (the derivative of y with respect to x). Differentiating both sides of the equation with respect to x, we get:

(2/3)x^(-1/3) + (2/3)y^(-1/3)(dy/dx) = 0.

Now, we can solve for dy/dx:

(2/3)y^(-1/3)(dy/dx) = -(2/3)x^(-1/3).

dy/dx = -[x^(-1/3)/y^(-1/3)].

Next, plug in the given point (-3√3, 1) into the expression for dy/dx:

dy/dx = -[(-3√3)^(-1/3) / 1^(-1/3)] = -(-1/3).

Therefore, dy/dx = 1/3 at the given point.

Now, we have the slope of the tangent line (1/3) and the point (-3√3, 1). Using the point-slope form of a linear equation, we can find the equation of the tangent line:

y - 1 = (1/3)(x + 3√3).

Thus, the equation of the tangent line to the curve x^(2/3) + y^(2/3) = 4 at the point (-3√3, 1) is y - 1 = (1/3)(x + 3√3).

Learn more about equation at : brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

Answer:

A and C are true

I have a a question i don't know what answer to put on i only have the answer 125

Answer:4x

Step-by-step explanation:

3+1= 4, so just add the x

4x

Answer: was there a number with the equaision

Step-by-step explanation:

The green triangle with the preimage coordinates and the image coordinates are listed below

Preimage   image

A (-5, 2)        A' (2, -5)

B (-3, 5)        B' (5, -3)

C (-1, 4)         C' (4, -1)

The transformation is according to the transformation rule given in the problem

rule ( x, y) --> (y, x)

This rule exchanges the coordinates of the triangle to produce a reflection over the line y = x

The image of the reflection is attached

Learn more about the reflection at

https://brainly.com/question/26642069

#SPJ1

complete question

The coordinates of the green triangle are

A (-5, 2)      

B (-3, 5)      

C (-1, 4)  

The sequence given is {1,1/3,1/5,1/7,1/9,...} and we are asked to find a formula for the general term an of this sequence. Specifically, the nth term in the sequence is the reciprocal of the (2n - 1)th odd number. Thus, the formula for the general term an of the sequence is given by:

an = (-1)^(n+1) / (2n - 1)

This formula can be derived by noting that the signs of the terms alternate between positive and negative, with the first term being positive. Therefore, we introduce a factor of (-1)^(n+1) to account for the sign of each term. Additionally, we observe that the denominator of each term is an odd number of the form 2n - 1, where n is the position of the term in the sequence. Thus, we express the general term as the reciprocal of the denominator with the appropriate sign.

In summary, the formula for the general term an of the sequence {1,1/3,1/5,1/7,1/9,...} is an = (-1)^(n+1) / (2n - 1), where n is the position of the term in the sequence. This formula gives us a way to find any term in the sequence by plugging in its position for n.

To further explain, we can consider the first few terms of the sequence and see how the formula applies. The first term corresponds to n = 1, so we have a1 = (-1)^(1+1) / (2(1) - 1) = 1/1 = 1. The second term corresponds to n = 2, so we have a2 = (-1)^(2+1) / (2(2) - 1) = -1/3. Similarly, the third term corresponds to n = 3, so we have a3 = (-1)^(3+1) / (2(3) - 1) = 1/5. We can continue in this way to find any term in the sequence using the formula for the general term.

Learn more about Sequence:

brainly.com/question/30262438

#SPJ11

The area of the rhombus is 17.5 square inches.

The formula to find the area of a rhombus is:

Area = (diagonal1 x diagonal2) / 2

where diagonal1 and diagonal2 are the lengths of the diagonals.

diagonal1 = 7 inches and diagonal2 = 5 inches.

we can plug these values into the formula:

Area = (7 x 5) / 2

Area = 35 / 2

Area = 17.5 square inches

Therefore, the area of the rhombus is 17.5 square inches.

To learn more on Rhombus click:

https://brainly.com/question/27870968

#SPJ1

The statement Catching the 8:05 bus is a sufficient condition for my being on time for work can be written as if a, then b, where, a is the case where I catch the 8:05 bus and b is the case where I reach the office on time.

Here we have been given that the sufficient condition for my being on time for work is catching the 8:05 bus.

Whenever we are denoting to cases say x and y, we say x being a sufficient condition for y by the notation

y ⇒ x

Here, let there be cases a and b

a is the case where I catch the 8:05 bus and

b is the case where I reach the office on time

Since a is a sufficient condition for b, we can write

a ⇒ b

In the If- then form, we say

If a, then b.

To learn more about Conditional Statements visit

https://brainly.com/question/18575521

#SPJ4

If k4 - k3 = 2, n = 100, RSS3 = 500 and RSS4 = 400, the test statistic value would be F = ((500 - 400)/2)/(400/(100-4)) = 6.25. The degrees of freedom would be (2, 94) and the p-value would be less than 0.05. Therefore, we would reject the null hypothesis.

To test whether the fourth-order model explains a statistically significant amount of variation in total weekly cost above and beyond that explained by the third-order model, we would use an F-test. The null hypothesis is that the third-order model is sufficient and the alternative hypothesis is that the fourth-order model provides a better fit. The degrees of freedom for the numerator would be the difference in the number of parameters between the two models (k4 - k3) and the degrees of freedom for the denominator would be the sample size minus the number of parameters in the fourth-order model (n - k4).

The test statistic value would be calculated as F = ((RSS3 - RSS4)/(k4 - k3))/(RSS4/(n - k4)), where RSS3 and RSS4 are the residual sums of squares for the third and fourth-order models, respectively. The p-value would be calculated using an F-distribution with (k4 - k3) and (n - k4) degrees of freedom and comparing the calculated F value to the critical value at a 5% significance level. For example, if k4 - k3 = 2, n = 100, RSS3 = 500 and RSS4 = 400, the test statistic value would be F = ((500 - 400)/2)/(400/(100-4)) = 6.25. The degrees of freedom would be (2, 94) and the p-value would be less than 0.05. Therefore, we would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the fourth-order model provides a statistically significant improvement in explaining the variation in total weekly cost above and beyond that explained by the third-order model.

Learn more about numerator here:

brainly.com/question/11716216

#SPJ11

The number of ways of choosing the flowers is given by the combination and C = 84 ways

Given data ,

Let the number of ways of choosing the flowers be C

The total number of flower pots x = 6

And , the number of types of flowers n = 9

Now , from the combination , we get

ⁿCₓ = n! / ( ( n - x )! x! )

⁹C₆ = 9! / ( 9 - 6 )! 6!

On simplifying , we get

⁹C₆ = 7 x 8 x 9 / 2 x 3

⁹C₆ = 84 ways

Hence , the combination is solved and C = 84 ways

To learn more about combinations click :

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ1

1. Ravit has used the strategy of Initial Research to begin narrowing her topic. She has identified several areas of track and field, including the history, famous athletes, competitive events, and world records. This initial research helps her understand the different aspects of track and field before choosing a specific direction for her speech.

2. The correct answer is c. If there are more little kids than adults, the median age will reflect the ages of the kids. This is possible because the mean age can be influenced by a few higher age values (such as adults in their twenties), while the median age is the middle value when the ages are sorted in numerical order, which can be lower if there are more kids with lower ages.

#SPJ11

Learn more about initial research and median on: https://brainly.com/question/16408033

The A 5 gallons of water will pour through the hose in 8 minutes.

The formula to be used for calculation of amount of water pouring through hose :

Total amount of water = amount of water pouring per minute × amount of time (in minutes)

Keep the values in formula to find the total amount of water

Total amount of water = 2.5 × 8

Performing multiplication on Right Hand Side of the equation

Total amount of water = 20 quarts

Now performing unit conversion

Amount of water in gallon = amount of water in quarts × 0.25

Amount of water in gallon = 20 × 0.25

Amount of water = 5 gallon

Hence, the correct answer is A 5.

Learn more about unit conversion -

https://brainly.com/question/21663631

#SPJ4

The basic eigenvector corresponding to λ₁ = 4 is v₁ = [3.75, 4], and the basic eigenvector corresponding to λ₂ = -3 is v₂ = [5, 6].

To find the eigenvalues of matrix A, we need to solve the characteristic equation:

|A - λI| = 0

where I is the identity matrix of the same size as A, and λ is the eigenvalue we are trying to find.

For matrix A given as:

a=[8 -15]

[6 -10]

we have:

|A - λI| =

|8 - λ -15 |

|6 -10- λ |

Expanding the determinant, we get:

(8 - λ)(-10 - λ) - (-15)(6) = 0

Simplifying the expression, we get:

λ² - 2λ - 12 = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

λ₁ = 4

λ₂ = -3

Therefore, the distinct eigenvalues of A are λ₁ = 4 and λ₂ = -3.

Next, we find the eigenvectors corresponding to each eigenvalue. We do this by solving the system of equations:

(A - λI)x = 0

For λ₁ = 4:

A - λ₁I =

|8 - 4 -15 |

|6 -10 - 4 |

=

|4 -15 |

|6 -14|

RREF:

|1 -3.75|

|0 0 |

Thus, we have a free variable x₂. Setting x₂ = 4, we get the basic eigenvector:

v₁ = [3.75, 4]

Therefore, there is one basic eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue λ₁ = 4.

For λ₂ = -3:

A - λ₂I =

|8 15 |

|6 7 |

RREF:

|1 -5/6|

|0 0 |

Thus, we have a free variable x₂. Setting x₂ = 6, we get the basic eigenvector:

v₂ = [5, 6]

Therefore, there is one basic eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue λ₂ = -3.

In summary, the distinct eigenvalues of matrix A are λ₁ = 4 and λ₂ = -3. There is one basic eigenvector corresponding to each eigenvalue. The basic eigenvector corresponding to λ₁ = 4 is v₁ = [3.75, 4], and the basic eigenvector corresponding to λ₂ = -3 is v₂ = [5, 6].

To learn more about corresponding visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1597341

#SPJ11

The simplified expression is 40xy.

To simplify (5x)² (2y)³/10x⁴y², we can first simplify the numerator by using the power of a power rule, which states that when we raise an exponent to another exponent, we multiply the exponents.

So, (5x)² can be simplified as 25x², and (2y)³ can be simplified as 8y³.

The expression now becomes:

(25x²)(8y³) / 10x⁴y²

We can simplify this further by canceling out common factors. We can divide both the numerator and denominator by 5x²y²:

(25x²)(8y³) / (10x⁴y²) = (5x²y³)(8) / (2x²y²)

Simplifying this further, we can cancel out the x² in the numerator and denominator:

(5xy³)(8) / y²

Finally, we can simplify by multiplying 5 and 8:

40xy³ / y²

This can be simplified further by dividing y³ by y², which gives us:

40xy

So, the simplified expression is 40xy.

Learn more about Exponents: https://brainly.com/question/15993626

#SPJ11

Answer:

56 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

the total sum of the angles in a triangle is 180

90+34+b=180

b=180-124

=56

Answer:

56°

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of interior angles in a triangle is equal to 180°.

The triangle shown in the image is a right triangle so one of the angle measure is 90°.

Given, the other angle is 34°, we can find the value of missing angle with the following equation:

x + 90° + 34° = 180°

x + 124° = 180°

x = 56°

When rolling of 6-sided die, P(divisor of 9) is 1/3.

A divisor of 9 is a number that divides 9 evenly with no remainder. The divisors of 9 are 1, 3, and 9.

Since a 6-sided die has 6 equally likely outcomes, the probability of rolling any single number is 1/6.

To find the probability of rolling a divisor of 9, we need to count the number of favorable outcomes, which are the numbers 3 and 9, and divide by the total number of possible outcomes:

P(divisor of 9) = favorable outcomes / total outcomes

P(divisor of 9) = 2/6

P(divisor of 9) = 1/3

Therefore, the probability of rolling a divisor of 9 with a 6-sided die is 1/3.

To learn more about 6-sided die here:

https://brainly.com/question/31234024

#SPJ1

This is the minimum variance of 0, and we can see that it decreases as n increases.

What is the standard deviation?

A measure of a group of values' variance or dispersion in statistics is called the standard deviation. When the standard deviation is low, the values are more likely to fall within a narrow range, also known as the expected value, whereas when the standard deviation is high, the values tend to be closer to the mean. The lowercase Greek letter sigma, which stands for the population standard deviation, or the Latin letter s, which stands for the sample standard deviation, are most frequently used in mathematical equations and texts to represent standard deviation. Standard deviation is also sometimes referred to as SD.

To find the minimum variance unbiased estimator of 0, we first take the natural logarithm of the likelihood function:

ln [tex]L(0; Y_1, Y_2, ..., Y_n) = -n*0 - (Y_1+Y_2+...+Y_n)[/tex]

Taking the derivative with respect to 0 and setting it equal to zero, we get:

d/d0 ln [tex]L(0; Y_1, Y_2, ..., Y_n) = -n + 0 = 0[/tex]

Therefore, the maximum likelihood estimator of 0 is:

[tex]0 = ΣY_i / n[/tex]

To show that it is unbiased, we take the expected value of 0:

[tex]E(0) = E(ΣYi / n) = (1/n) E(ΣYi) = (1/n) nE(Y1) = (1/n) n(0+1) = 1[/tex]

Since E(0) = 1, we can see that 0 is an unbiased estimator of 0.

To find the variance of 0, we use the fact that [tex]Var(Yi) = E(Yi^2) - [E(Yi)]^2 = 1 - 0^2 = 1 - (ΣYi / n)^2.[/tex] Therefore:

[tex]Var(0^) = Var(ΣYi / n) = (1/n^2) Var(ΣYi) = (1/n^2) nVar(Y1) = 1/n - (ΣYi / n)^2[/tex]

This is the minimum variance of 0, and we can see that it decreases as n increases.

Learn more about standard deviation, by the following link.

https://brainly.com/question/12402189

#SPJ4

If Pepe and Leo continue to deposit the same amount of money every month, their balances will be the same and continue to grow at the same rate i.e. Pepe's balance = $3,600 and Leo's balance = $3,600.

If we assume that Pepe and Leo continue to deposit the same amount of money every month and that the interest rate remains constant, we can use a formula to calculate the future value of their savings. The formula for future value is:

FV = PV x (1 + r)n

Where:

FV stands for the savings account's future value.

PV stands for the savings account's initial balance's present value.

The interest rate, r, is considered to be zero in this instance.

The number of months is n.

If we assume that Pepe and Leo deposit $100 each per month, we can use this formula to calculate the future value of their savings after a certain number of months. For example:

After 12 months:

Pepe's balance = $1,200

Leo's balance = $1,200

After 24 months:

Pepe's balance = $2,400

Leo's balance = $2,400

After 36 months:

Pepe's balance = $3,600

Leo's balance = $3,600

Learn more about saving account:

brainly.com/question/30474443

#SPJ4

We are similar to gram-negative. It must be noted that we are neither and have different cell characteristics compared to bacteria.

The bacterial cells are classified as gram postive and gram negative depending on their cell membrane structure. The gram negative bacteria are rich in lipid layer and thin peptidoglycan while gram postive have more peptidoglycan content.

Now, peptidoglycan are responsible for gram staining. Human epithelial cells do not have peptidoglycan which do not let them take up the stain. Hence, humans will be considered gram negative while noting the identity will be completely different.

Learn more about gram stain -

https://brainly.com/question/13561218

#SPJ4

The proportion of baseballs produced by the factory that are too heavy for use by Major League Baseball is negligible.

The proportion of baseballs produced by the factory that are acceptable for use by Major League Baseball is 1.

The probability that the average weight of the baseballs the coach purchases is greater than 5.15 ounces is negligible.

a) To find the proportion of baseballs produced by the factory that are too heavy for use by Major League Baseball, we need to find the probability of a baseball weighing more than 525 ounces, which is beyond the acceptable weight range.

Let X be the weight of a baseball produced by the factory. Then, X ~ N(511, 0.062^2) (approximately normally distributed with mean 511 ounces and standard deviation 0.062 ounces).

We need to find P(X > 525).

Standardizing, we get:

Z = (X - μ) / σ = (525 - 511) / 0.062 = 225.81

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find P(Z > 225.81) is approximately 0. Therefore, the proportion of baseballs produced by the factory that are too heavy for use by Major League Baseball is negligible.

b) To find the proportion of baseballs produced by the factory that are acceptable for use by Major League Baseball, we need to find the probability of a baseball weighing between 5 and 525 ounces.

Let X be the weight of a baseball produced by the factory. Then, X ~ N(511, 0.062^2) (approximately normally distributed with mean 511 ounces and standard deviation 0.062 ounces).

We need to find P(5 <= X <= 525).

Standardizing, we get:

Z1 = (5 - 511) / 0.062 = -8274.19

Z2 = (525 - 511) / 0.062 = 225.81

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find P(-8274.19 < Z < 225.81) is approximately 1. Therefore, the proportion of baseballs produced by the factory that are acceptable for use by Major League Baseball is 1.

c) Let Y be the average weight of 20 baseballs purchased by the coach. Then, Y ~ N(511, 0.062^2/20) (approximately normally distributed with mean 511 ounces and standard deviation 0.01396 ounces).

We need to find P(Y > 5.15).

Standardizing, we get:

Z = (Y - μ) / (σ / sqrt(n)) = (5.15 - 511) / (0.062 / sqrt(20)) = 6.123

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find P(Z > 6.123) is approximately 0. Therefore, the probability that the average weight of the baseballs the coach purchases is greater than 5.15 ounces is negligible.

Learn more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11