the estimated resale value (in dollars) of a company car after years is given by 23,351 0.783 . what is the rate of depreciation (in dollars per year) after 2 years? round to the nearest cent. the car is depreciating at $ per year. note: the rate of depreciation is |r'(t)|. your answer should be positive.

The missing value so that the relation is still a function is {(3, 7), (0, −2), (1, −3), (−2, 1), (1, 4)} (option b)

In this case, let's first check if the given set is a function without the missing value. We can do this by checking if each input value appears only once in the set. If we look at the set {(3, 7), (0, −2), (−2, 1), (1, 4)}, we can see that each input value appears only once, which means that the set is a function.

Now, we need to determine which value can replace the missing value so that the set remains a function. Let's consider each option one by one.

If we replace the missing input value with 1, we get {(3, 7), (0, −2), (1, −3), (−2, 1), (1, 4)}. Here, we can see that each input value maps to a unique output value, which means that the set is still a function.

Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

To know more about function here

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ1

The confidence level is 1 - α = 1 - 0.005 = 0.995 or approximately 99.5%.

We can use the formula for a confidence interval for a population mean, which is:

[tex]x ± z(α/2) * σ/√n[/tex]

where x is the sample mean, σ is the population standard deviation, n is the sample size, and z(α/2) is the critical value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired confidence level (α).

In this case, the interval is x ± 2.81σ/√n, which is equivalent to z(α/2) = 2.81.

To find the confidence level, we need to solve for α. We can do this by finding the area in the tails of the standard normal distribution that corresponds to z(α/2) = 2.81. Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we find that the area in the right tail is 0.0025, so the area in both tails is 0.005.

Therefore, the confidence level is 1 - α = 1 - 0.005 = 0.995 or approximately 99.5%.

To know more about sample mean  here

https://brainly.com/question/29441200

#SPJ4

Answer:

The system of equations y = x + 6 and y = -x + 2 has no solution.

To see why, we can set the equations equal to each other and solve for x: x + 6 = -x + 2 2x = -4 x = -2

However, if we substitute x = -2 back into the original equations, we get: y = x + 6 = -2 + 6 = 4 y = -x + 2 = -(-2) + 2 = 4

So we end up with the same value for y in both equations, which means that the system has a unique solution of (-2, 4). Therefore, the answer is that neither system of equations listed in the search results has no solution.

Step-by-step explanation:

We then use the condition that b is unique to obtain a restriction on the values of a. Solving this restriction, we find that a can take any value except a = 2/3.

Let the given quadratic equation be denoted by f(x) = x^2 + 2bx + (a-b) = 0. Since f(x) has only one real solution, its discriminant must be zero: b^2 = a-b. Rearranging this equation, we get a = b^2 + b.

Substituting this expression for a into the equation for f(x), we obtain:

f(x) = x^2 + 2bx + (b^2 + b - b) = x^2 + 2bx + b^2.

This is a quadratic equation in b with discriminant 4x^2 - 4b^2 = 4(x+b)(x-b). For f(x) to have a unique real solution, this discriminant must be zero, which implies that x = -b. Substituting this value into f(x), we get:

f(-b) = (-b)^2 + 2b(-b) + b^2 = b^2 - 2b^2 + b^2 = 0.

Therefore, -b is a root of f(x), and since f(x) is a quadratic, this means that f(x) is divisible by (x+b). Thus we have:

f(x) = (x+b)(x+(a-b)/b) = (x+b)(x+b+1).

Since b is unique, this implies that (a-b)/b = b+1, or equivalently, a = b^2 + 2b.

Finally, we need to find the values of a for which b is unique. Suppose there are two distinct values of b that satisfy the condition above. Then, their difference satisfies:

(b_1)^2 + 2b_1 - (b_2)^2 - 2b_2 = 0,

which factors as (b_1 - b_2)(b_1 + b_2 + 2) = 0. Since b_1 and b_2 are distinct, the only possibility is that b_1 = -b_2 - 2.

Substituting this into the expression for a, we get:

a = (b_1)^2 + 2b_1 = (-b_2 - 2)^2 - 2(b_2 + 2) = b_2^2 + 2b_2 - 4.

Therefore, a - b_2^2 - 2b_2 + 4 = 0, or equivalently, (a-2)/3 = (b_2+1)^2, which implies that a-2 is a perfect square multiple of 3. Since b_2 can be any real number, this restriction on a is necessary and sufficient.

In summary, the value of a for which the given quadratic equation has a unique real solution is a = b^2 + 2b, where b is any real number except b = -1/2. Equivalently, a can take any value except a = 2/3.

Learn more about Quadratic :

brainly.com/question/22364785

#SPJ11

If you're conducting a significance test for the difference between the means of two independent samples, your null hypothesis would be option E, H0: μ1 - μ2 = 0, which means that there is no significant difference between the means of the two independent samples. The alternative hypothesis, denoted as Ha, would be that there is a significant difference between the means of the two independent samples.

In order to test the null hypothesis, you would need to use a statistical test such as the t-test or z-test, depending on the sample size and whether the population standard deviations are known or unknown. These tests would provide a p-value, which indicates the probability of obtaining a difference between the means as extreme or more extreme than the observed difference, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
If the p-value is less than the chosen significance level (usually 0.05), then the null hypothesis can be rejected and it can be concluded that there is a significant difference between the means of the two independent samples. Otherwise, if the p-value is greater than the significance level, then the null hypothesis cannot be rejected and it can be concluded that there is not enough evidence to suggest a significant difference between the means of the two independent samples.
When you are conducting a significance test for the difference between the means of two independent samples, the null hypothesis is a statement that there is no significant difference between the population means of the two groups. In this case, the correct null hypothesis is:

C. H0: μ1 - μ2 = 0
This hypothesis states that the difference between the population means of the two independent samples (μ1 and μ2) is equal to zero, which implies that there is no significant difference between the two population means. The alternative hypothesis would be that there is a significant difference (either μ1 > μ2, μ1 < μ2, or simply μ1 ≠ μ2, depending on the type of test being performed).

To test this hypothesis, you would collect data from the two independent samples and calculate the sample means (x1 and x2). Then, you would conduct a statistical test, such as a t-test or a z-test, to compare the sample means and determine the probability (p-value) of obtaining a difference as large as, or larger than, the one observed in your samples, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

If the p-value is smaller than a predetermined significance level (commonly set at 0.05), you would reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, concluding that there is a significant difference between the population means. If the p-value is greater than the significance level, you would fail to reject the null hypothesis, meaning that there is not enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the population means.

Learn more about samples at : brainly.com/question/13287171

#SPJ11

To express the integral e f(x, y, z) dv as an iterated integral in six different ways, where e is the solid bounded by the given surfaces, we need to determine the limits of integration for each variable. Let's assume that the solid e is bounded by the surfaces g1(x,y,z), g2(x,y,z), h1(x,y,z), and h2(x,y,z).

The first way to express the integral is by integrating with respect to x first, then y, then z:
∫∫∫e f(x, y, z) dv = ∫h1(z)h2(z) ∫g1(y,z)x ∫g2(y,z)x f(x,y,z) dx dy dz

The second way is by integrating with respect to y first, then x, then z:
∫∫∫e f(x, y, z) dv = ∫g1(x)g2(x) ∫h1(z)y ∫h2(z)y f(x,y,z) dy dx dz

The third way is by integrating with respect to z first, then x, then y:
∫∫∫e f(x, y, z) dv = ∫g1(x)g2(x) ∫h1(y)x ∫h2(y)x f(x,y,z) dz dx dy

The fourth way is by integrating with respect to x first, then z, then y:
∫∫∫e f(x, y, z) dv = ∫g1(y)g2(y) ∫h1(z)y ∫h2(z)y f(x,y,z) dx dz dy

The fifth way is by integrating with respect to y first, then z, then x:
∫∫∫e f(x, y, z) dv = ∫h1(x)h2(x) ∫g1(z)x ∫g2(z)x f(x,y,z) dy dz dx

The sixth way is by integrating with respect to z first, then y, then x:
∫∫∫e f(x, y, z) dv = ∫h1(x)h2(x) ∫g1(y)z ∫g2(y)z f(x,y,z) dz dy dx

In all six ways, the limits of integration are determined by the bounding surfaces of the solid e. By integrating iteratively with respect to each variable, we can find the volume of the solid e.
The solid E is bounded by the given surfaces.

Here are the six different ways to express the integral as an iterated integral:

1.

dx dy dz order:
∫∫∫_E f(x, y, z) dx dy dz

2.

dx dz dy order:
∫∫∫_E f(x, y, z) dx dz dy

3.

dy dx dz order:
∫∫∫_E f(x, y, z) dy dx dz

4.

dy dz dx order:
∫∫∫_E f(x, y, z) dy dz dx

5.

dz dx dy order:
∫∫∫_E f(x, y, z) dz dx dy

6.

dz dy dx order:
∫∫∫_E f(x, y, z) dz dy dx

Each of these six ways represents a different order of integrating the function f(x, y, z) over the solid E, which is bounded by the given surfaces. The choice of the order of integration depends on the specific problem and the boundaries of the solid E. When solving a problem, you should carefully analyze the given surfaces and choose the most suitable order of integration to make the calculations easier.

Learn more about integration at : brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

True, in a paired analysis, we first calculate the difference for each pair of observations and then perform inference on these differences.

The difference between each pair of observations is taken, and then statistical inference is performed on these differences. This type of analysis is often used when the data are collected in pairs, such as before-and-after measurements or measurements on matched subjects.

Learn more about paired analysis here:

https://brainly.com/question/31385381

#SPJ11

The joint probability mass function of X and Y, E[X|Y=1] = 2, E[X|Y=2] = 5/2, and E[X|Y=3] = 8/3.If it is true for all values of x and y, then X and Y are independent. Otherwise, they are dependent.

To compute E[X|Y=i], we need to use the formula:

[tex]E[X|Y=i] = ∑ x*xp(x|Y=i) / P(Y=i)[/tex]

where xp(x|Y=i) is the conditional probability of X given Y=i, and P(Y=i) is the marginal probability of Y=i.

Using Bayes' theorem, we can compute the conditional probabilities xp(x|Y=i) as follows: xp(1|Y=1) = P(X=1,Y=1) / P(Y=1) = (1/9) / (1/9 + 1/3 + 1/9) = 1/3. xp(2|Y=1) = P(X=2,Y=1) / P(Y=1) = (1/3) / (1/9 + 1/3 + 1/9) = 1/3. xp(3|Y=1) = P(X=3,Y=1) / P(Y=1) = (1/9) / (1/9 + 1/3 + 1/9) = 1/3. xp(1|Y=2) = P(X=1,Y=2) / P(Y=2) = (1/9) / (1/9 + 0 + 1/18) = 2/3. xp(2|Y=2) = P(X=2,Y=2) / P(Y=2) = 0 / (1/9 + 0 + 1/18) = 0

xp(3|Y=2) = P(X=3,Y=2) / P(Y=2) = (1/18) / (1/9 + 0 + 1/18) = 1/2. xp(1|Y=3) = P(X=1,Y=3) / P(Y=3) = 0 / (1/9 + 1/6 + 1/9) = 0. xp(2|Y=3) = P(X=2,Y=3) / P(Y=3) = (1/18) / (1/9 + 1/6 + 1/9) = 1/3. xp(3|Y=3) = P(X=3,Y=3) / P(Y=3) = (1/9) / (1/9 + 1/6 +1/9) = 2/3

Using these conditional probabilities, we can compute the conditional expectations E[X|Y=i] as follows: E[X|Y=1] =

[tex]1*(1/3) + 2*(1/3) + 3*(1/3)[/tex]

= 2

E[X|Y=2] =

[tex]1*(2/3) + 20 + 3(1/2) = 5/2 E[X|Y=3][/tex]

=

[tex]10 + 2(1/3) + 3*(2/3) = 8/3[/tex]

To determine if X and Y are independent, we need to check if the joint probability mass function can be factored into the product of the marginal probability mass functions: p(x,y) = p(x) * p(y)

Learn more about joint probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30224798

#SPJ4

(aH)(bH) = abH.

To prove that H is not a normal subgroup of G, we need to show that there exists an element g in G such that gHg^-1 is not a subset of H.

First, note that the left cosets of H in G are {1, b} and {a, ab}. Let g = a. Then we have:

gHg^-1 = a{1, b}a^-1 = {a, ab}

Since {a, ab} is not a subset of H, we have shown that H is not a normal subgroup of G.

Now, let's show the multiplication of the left coset

(aH)(bH) = {a, ab}{b, bb} = {ab, abb, b, bb}

To simplify this expression, we can use the fact that b^2 = 1 and ab = ba^-1. Then, we have:

(aH)(bH) = {ab, abb, b, bb} = {ba^-1, baa^-1, b, 1} = {b, a, ba, 1} = (abH)

Therefore, (aH)(bH) = abH.

To learn more about multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11527721

#SPJ11

The fraction of these batteries that would be expected to survive beyond 1000 days is 0.0021 or approximately 0.21%.

To find the fraction of automotive batteries that would be expected to survive beyond 1000 days, we need to use the information given about the mean and standard deviation of the battery life.

We know that the mean (average) battery life is 900 days, and the standard deviation is 35 days. This means that the distribution of battery life follows a normal curve, with most batteries falling within a range of values centered around the mean.

To find the fraction of batteries that would survive beyond 1000 days, we need to calculate the z-score for this value. The z-score represents the number of standard deviations that a value is from the mean.

The formula for calculating the z-score is:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the value we are interested in (1000 days), μ is the mean (900 days), and σ is the standard deviation (35 days).

Plugging in these values, we get:

z = (1000 - 900) / 35 = 2.86

We can use a z-score table or calculator to find the proportion of values beyond this z-score.

From the z-score table, we can see that the area beyond a z-score of 2.86 is 0.0021. This means that only 0.21% of automotive batteries would be expected to survive beyond 1000 days.

Therefore, the fraction of these batteries that would be expected to survive beyond 1000 days is 0.0021 or approximately 0.21%.

Learn more about mean at https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

The probability of between 90% and 95% (not inclusive) of seeds sprouting is indeed about 0.231.

Using the given information, we can model X, the number of seeds that sprout, as a binomial random variable with n = 1000 and p = 0.92.

To find the expected number of seeds that will sprout, we can use the formula for the expected value of a binomial distribution: E(X) = np. Therefore, E(X) = 1000 * 0.92 = 920.

To find the standard deviation of the number of seeds that will sprout, we can use the formula for the standard deviation of a binomial distribution: SD(X) = sqrt(np(1-p)). Therefore, SD(X) = sqrt(1000 * 0.92 * 0.08) = 8.05.

To find the probability that between 950 and 1000 seeds will sprout (inclusive), we can use the cumulative distribution function of the binomial distribution. P(950 <= X <= 1000) = P(X <= 1000) - P(X <= 949) = binom.dist(1000, 0.92, TRUE) - binom.dist(949, 0.92, TRUE) ≈ 0.991.

To find the probability that between 90% and 95% (not inclusive) of seeds sprout, we need to find the values of k such that P(0 <= X <= k) = 0.95 - 0.90 = 0.05. We can use a normal approximation to the binomial distribution with mean np = 920 and standard deviation sqrt(np(1-p)) = 8.05. The standardized value for k is (k - np) / sqrt(np(1-p)), which we can find using the standard normal distribution table or a calculator. We get z ≈ 1.645. Solving for k, we get k = np + z * sqrt(np(1-p)) ≈ 940. Therefore, the probability that between 90% and 95% (not inclusive) of seeds sprout is P(X <= 939) - P(X <= 920) ≈ 0.231.

To find the number of seeds they should plant if they want to have a 5% chance of getting less than or equal to 1000 sprouts, we can use the inverse cumulative distribution function of the binomial distribution. We need to find the value of n such that P(X <= 1000) = 0.95. We can start with a guess of n = 1200 and use the binomial distribution function to calculate P(X <= 1000) for different values of n until we get a value close to 0.95. We can also use a normal approximation to the binomial distribution with mean np and standard deviation sqrt(np(1-p)) to get an estimate for n. We get z ≈ 1.645 as before, so we can solve for np to get np ≈ 977. Solving for n, we get n ≈ 1061. Therefore, they should plant 1061 seeds if they want to have a 5% chance of getting less than or equal to 1000 sprouts.

Check:

The expected value of X is indeed 920.

The standard deviation of X is indeed 8.05.

The probability of getting between 950 and 1000 sprouts (inclusive) is indeed about 0.991.

The probability of between 90% and 95% (not inclusive) of seeds sprouting is indeed about 0.231.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

the following points have been plotted on the cartesian plan:

(-3, 2) and

(-3, -2). The above represent coordinates.

A coordinate system in geometry is a system that employs one or more integers, or coordinates, to define the position of points or other geometric components on a manifold such as Euclidean space.

A coordinate system is a framework for specifying the relative positions of objects in a specific region, such as an area on the earth's surface or the whole earth's surface. A geographic coordinate system determines locations on the world by using a three-dimensional spherical surface.

Larn more about coordinates:
https://brainly.com/question/16634867
#SPJ1

The probability that a randomly-selected student from this survey ordered Ranch is approximately 0.2383.

We have,

Let R be the event that a student ordered Ranch dressing.

We want to find P(R), the probability that a randomly-selected student from the survey ordered Ranch.

Out of the 3000 students surveyed, 185 never ordered any dressing, so the remaining 3000 - 185 = 2815 students ordered some kind of dressing. Of these, 2100 ordered Caesar but not Ranch, so the remaining

2815 - 2100 = 715 students ordered Ranch or both dressings.

Now,

P(R) is the proportion of students who ordered Ranch or both dressings out of the total number of students surveyed:

P(R) = 715 / 3000 = 0.2383 (rounded to four decimal places)

Thus,

The probability that a randomly-selected student from this survey ordered Ranch is approximately 0.2383.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/14099682

#SPJ11

[tex]~~~~~~ \textit{Continuously Compounding Interest Earned Amount} \\\\ A=Pe^{rt}\qquad \begin{cases} A=\textit{accumulated amount}\\ P=\textit{original amount deposited}\dotfill & \$800\\ r=rate\to 11\%\to \frac{11}{100}\dotfill &0.11\\ t=years\dotfill &8 \end{cases} \\\\\\ A = 800e^{0.11\cdot 8}\implies A=800e^{0.88} \implies A \approx 1928.72[/tex]

When comparing the distributions of SAT scores for two schools, it is important to use a statistical measure that can accommodate the difference in the number of students in each school. In this case, since School A has 400 students while School B has 2700 students, the most useful statistical measure for making this comparison would be the percentage of students in each school who scored within certain SAT score ranges.

For example, instead of comparing the raw number of students who scored above a certain score threshold in each school, it would be more meaningful to compare the percentage of students in each school who scored above that threshold. This would give a more accurate representation of the distribution of SAT scores in each school, taking into account the different sizes of the student populations.

Another useful statistical measure for making this comparison would be to use box plots to visualize the distributions of SAT scores in each school. Box plots provide a clear and concise way to compare the minimum, maximum, median, and quartiles of SAT scores for each school.

In summary, the most useful statistical measures for comparing the distributions of SAT scores for School A and School B would be the percentage of students in each school who scored within certain score ranges, as well as the use of box plots to visualize the distributions.

More questions on comparison: https://brainly.com/question/1404938

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4=3

Answer:

88

Step-by-step explanation:

If you count by 2 backward from 100 6 times you get 88

Answer:

To find the zeros of x^2 + 10x + 24 = 0 using the zero product property, we need to factor the quadratic equation into two linear factors.

x^2 + 10x + 24 = 0 can be factored as (x + 6)(x + 4) = 0

Using the zero product property, we set each factor equal to zero and solve for x:

x + 6 = 0 or x + 4 = 0

x = -6 or x = -4

Therefore, the zeros of x^2 + 10x + 24 = 0 are -6 and -4.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: f(g(x)) = (x - 9)² + 2(x - 9)

= x² - 18x + 81 + 2x - 18

= x² - 16x + 81

Step-by-step explanation:

Mean- 6

Median- 6

Mode- 6 and 8

The measures of angle B is derived as 75° to the nearest degree using the cosine rules.

The cosines rule relates the lengths of the sides of a triangle to the cosine of one of its angles.

Using the cosine rule:

2² = 5² + (√45)² - 2(5)(√45)cosB

4 = 25 + 45 - 250cosB

4 = 70 - 250cosB

250cosB = 70 - 4 {collect like terms}

250cosB = 66

B = cos⁻¹(66/250) {cross multiplication}

B = 74. 6925°

Therefore, the measures of angle B is derived as 75° to the nearest degree using the cosine rules.

Read more about cosine rule here: https://brainly.com/question/4372174

#SPJ1

The probability of the first 2 participants preferring Simply Significant and the remaining 13 participants preferring one of the other coffee brands is approximately 0.0392.

Assuming that each participant has an equal chance of preferring any of the four coffee brands and that their preferences are independent of each other, we can model the preference of each participant as a Bernoulli random variable with probability p of preferring Simply Significant Coffee.

Then, the probability of the first 2 participants preferring Simply Significant Coffee and the remaining 13 participants preferring one of the other coffee brands can be calculated as follows:

P(2 participants prefer Simply Significant and 13 prefer other brands) = P(Simply Significant)^2 * P(other brands)^13

where P(Simply Significant) is the probability of a participant preferring Simply Significant Coffee and P(other brands) is the probability of a participant preferring one of the other brands, which is 1/3 since there are three other brands besides Simply Significant.

Using the binomial probability formula, we can calculate P(Simply Significant) as follows:

P(Simply Significant) = C(15,2) * (1/4)^2 * (3/4)^13

where C(15,2) is the number of ways to choose 2 participants out of 15.

Plugging in the values, we get:

P(Simply Significant) = 105 * (1/16) * (0.3164) ≈ 0.0392

Therefore, the probability of the first 2 participants preferring Simply Significant and the remaining 13 participants preferring one of the other coffee brands is approximately 0.0392.

Note that this assumes that participants are choosing at random and are not influenced by factors such as the order in which the coffees are presented or any other external factors that could affect their preferences.

To learn more about Significant visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31037173

#SPJ11

Performing the division algorithm to find the quotient q and the remainder r, and putting them in the formula for:

A division algorithm is one that, given two numbers N and D (the numerator and denominator, respectively), computes the quotient and/or remainder of Euclidean division. Some are done by hand, while others are done by digital circuit designs and software.

There are two types of division algorithms: slow division and quick division. Each cycle of slow division algorithms yields one digit of the final quotient. Slow division examples include restoring, non-performing restoring, non-restoring, and SRT division. Fast division methods begin with a close approximation to the eventual quotient and produce twice as many digits on each repetition. This category includes the Newton-Raphson and Goldschmidt algorithms.

By division algorithm

a = d.q + r

a = dividend

d = divisor

q = quotient

r = remainder

a) 19 is divided by 7.

a = d.q + r

19 = 7.2 + 5

So, q = 2, r = 5

(b) 39 is divided by 4.

a = d.q + r

39 = 4.9 + 3

So, q = 9, r = 3

(c) 45 is divided by 3.

a = d.q + r

45 = 3.15 + 0

So, q = 15, r = 0

(d) -18 is divided by 5.

a = d.q + r

-18 = 5.(-3) + (-3)

So, q = -3, r = -3

(e) −44 is divided by 10.

a = d.q + r

-44 = 10.(-4) + -4

So, q = -4, r = -4

(f) -111 is divided by 11.

a = d.q + r

-111 = 11.(-10) + -1

So, q = -10, r = -1

(g) 8 is divided by 3.

a = d.q + r

8 = 3.2 + 2

So, q = 2, r = 2.

Learn more about Division algorithm:

https://brainly.com/question/27893941

#SPJ4

Correctly reflects the interpretation of a confidence interval as a range of plausible values for the population mean.

(a) To determine a 95% confidence interval for the average weekly work hours of women in 2018, we can use the formula:

CI = X ± z*(σ/√n)

where X is the sample mean (38.15), σ is the population standard deviation (13.25), n is the sample size (711), and z* is the critical value from the standard Normal distribution that corresponds to a 95% confidence level.

Using a table or calculator, we find that z* = 1.96. Plugging in the values, we get:

CI = 38.15 ± 1.96*(13.25/√711) = (37.33, 38.97)

Therefore, we can be 95% confident that the true average weekly work hours of women in 2018 falls within the interval (37.33, 38.97).

(b) The statement "We are 95% confident that a woman's weekly work hours in the year 2018 will fall within our interval" is incorrect because it implies that we can make a statement about the individual weekly work hours of a single woman in 2018. However, confidence intervals are only valid for making statements about the population parameter (in this case, the population mean).

To fix the statement, we could rephrase it as "We are 95% confident that the true average weekly work hours of women in 2018 falls within our interval." This correctly reflects the interpretation of a confidence interval as a range of plausible values for the population mean.

To learn more about women visit:

https://brainly.com/question/928992

#SPJ11

Answer: If ABC measures 122 degrees and ADC is an inscribed angle that intercepts the same arc as a central angle ABC, then ADC measures half of ABC which is 61 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

61 degrees

Step-by-step explanation

Angle extended to the circumference is half the angle at the centre

ADC = ½ ABC = ½ × 122 = 61

The volume enclosed by the torus is π^2/2.

To find the volume enclosed by the torus, we can use cylindrical coordinates.

First, let's sketch the torus. It is a donut-shaped object, with a hole in the middle. The radius of the hole is given by the parameter a, and the radius of the entire torus is given by the parameter b. In this case, we have

ρ = 10sin(ϕ)

This means that the radius of the torus varies with the angle ϕ. At ϕ = 0 and ϕ = π, the radius is 0, while at ϕ = π/2, the radius is 10.

Now, to find the volume enclosed by the torus, we need to integrate the volume element over the appropriate region. In cylindrical coordinates, the volume element is given by

dV = ρ dz dϕ dθ

where ρ is the radius, dz is the height, and dθ is the angle around the z-axis. In this case, we can assume that the torus is symmetric around the z-axis, so we only need to consider a quarter of the torus, from ϕ = 0 to ϕ = π/2 and from θ = 0 to θ = π/2.

The limits of integration for ρ, ϕ, and θ are:

0 ≤ ρ ≤ 10sin(ϕ)

0 ≤ ϕ ≤ π/2

0 ≤ θ ≤ π/2

Thus, the volume enclosed by the torus is given by:

V = ∭ dV = ∫∫∫ ρ dz dϕ dθ

V = ∫0^(π/2) ∫0^(π/2) ∫0^(10sinϕ) ρ dz dρ dθ dϕ

Solving this integral gives:

V = π^2/2

Therefore, the volume enclosed by the torus is π^2/2.

To learn more about coordinates visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867?

#SPJ11

The sum of the probabilities is equal to 1 and all probabilities are between 0 and 1 (inclusive). Therefore, this is a probability distribution.

For a distribution to be a probability distribution, it must satisfy two conditions:

The sum of the probabilities for all possible values of X must be equal to 1.

The probability for each possible value of X must be between 0 and 1 (inclusive).

Let's check each distribution:

a) X 4 6 8 10 P(X) -0.6 0.2 0.7 1.5

This distribution does not satisfy the second condition, since the probability for X = 4 is negative (-0.6). Therefore, this is not a probability distribution.

b) X 8 9 12 P(X) 2 1 1 3 6 6

This distribution satisfies the first condition, since the sum of the probabilities is equal to 1. However, it does not satisfy the second condition, since the probability for X = 9 is 1, which is greater than 1. Therefore, this is not a probability distribution.

c) X P(X) 1 1 2 1 1 4 3 4 1 1 4 4 4 4

This distribution satisfies both conditions, since the sum of the probabilities is equal to 1 and all probabilities are between 0 and 1 (inclusive). Therefore, this is a probability distribution.

d) X P(X) 1 0.3 3 0.1 5 0.2

This distribution satisfies both conditions, since the sum of the probabilities is equal to 1 and all probabilities are between 0 and 1 (inclusive). Therefore, this is a probability distribution.

To learn more about probabilities visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

Answer:

68 squer meter

Step-by-step explanation:

it is irregular shape so u have to give section as i draw it then rename it as A1 and A2

A1 = L×W

=13m × 2m

= 26m2

A2= L × W

=7m × 6m

= 42m2

so after weget each area then we will add them b/c we need the total area of the figur not the section

let At = area of totalAt = A1 + A2

= 26m2 + 42m2

=68m2 good luck..

The best estimate of the proportion of student that likes jelly beans is 1/5

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Of the 25 students he surveyed, 5 said yes

The proportion is represented as

Proportion = yes/students

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Proportion = 5/25

Evaluate

Proportion = 1/5

Hence, the proportion is 1/5

Read more about proportion at

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ1

A. can be used to test joint hypotheses.

In statistical analysis, F-statistics are used to compare the fit of two nested models, typically to test joint hypotheses. Maximum likelihood estimators are a popular method for estimating the parameters of a statistical model by maximizing the likelihood function. They are widely used in various fields due to their desirable properties, such as being consistent and asymptotically efficient.

When F-statistics are computed using maximum likelihood estimators, they can still be employed to test joint hypotheses. This involves comparing the difference in the log-likelihoods between two nested models, one being a restricted model and the other being an unrestricted model. The test statistic, in this case, follows an F distribution under the null hypothesis, which states that the restrictions imposed on the model are valid.

Learn more about non-linear models here: brainly.com/question/29470083

#SPJ11

Answer:

The selling price of the house is $175,000 and they need to make a 20% down payment, so the down payment amount is:

Down payment = 20% x $175,000 = $35,000

To find the amount financed with the mortgage, we need to subtract the down payment from the selling price:

Amount financed = Selling price - Down payment

Amount financed = $175,000 - $35,000

Amount financed = $140,000

Next, we need to calculate the closing costs. Let's assume the closing costs are 3% of the selling price:

Closing costs = 3% x $175,000 = $5,250

Since the bank allows them to finance the closing costs as part of the mortgage, we need to add the closing costs to the amount financed:

Total amount of the mortgage = Amount financed + Closing costs

Total amount of the mortgage = $140,000 + $5,250

Total amount of the mortgage = $145,250

Therefore, the actual amount financed with the mortgage is $140,000, the closing costs are $5,250, and the total amount of the mortgage if the closing costs are financed is $145,250.