Answer:
The powers of the Executive Branch have significantly expanded since the writing of the Constitution. In the early days of the United States, the President's powers were limited to executing the laws passed by Congress and serving as the Commander-in-Chief of the military. However, over time, the Executive Branch's role and powers have grown to include implementing and enforcing regulations, managing the nation's foreign affairs, and having a significant role in the budgeting process.
The Federalists, who supported a strong centralized government, favored a powerful Executive Branch. They believed that a strong Executive was necessary to ensure that the laws passed by Congress were implemented effectively and to maintain order and stability in the country. They argued that the President needed to be able to act quickly and decisively in times of crisis, without being tied down by the constraints of the legislative branch.
On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, who were wary of centralized power and favored stronger state governments, were skeptical of a powerful Executive Branch. They feared that a strong President could become tyrannical and usurp the powers of the other branches of government, leading to a loss of individual liberties.
In modern times, the powers of the Executive Branch have continued to expand. Some argue that this expansion has been necessary to address the increasingly complex and interconnected issues facing the country, while others argue that it has led to an imbalance of power that threatens individual rights and liberties.
The Federalists would likely argue that the expansion of Executive power has been necessary to address the challenges of modern governance. They might point to the Supreme Court case of United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936), in which the Court upheld the President's power to take executive action in matters of foreign policy. They might also cite the War Powers Resolution (1973), which provides a framework for the President to use military force, as an example of the necessary expansion of Executive power.
The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely argue that the expansion of Executive power has led to a dangerous concentration of power in the hands of the President. They might point to the recent use of executive orders to bypass Congress and implement policies unilaterally as an example of this concentration of power. They might also cite the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and argue that the government's surveillance programs, which have been implemented by the Executive Branch, violate this protection.
Overall, the debate over the modern-day Executive Branch is a complex one, and there are valid arguments to be made from both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives. However, it is clear that the role and powers of the Executive Branch have evolved significantly since the writing of the Constitution, and this evolution will likely continue as the country faces new and increasingly complex challenges.
Explanation:
Answer: The powers of the Executive Branch have significantly expanded since the writing of the Constitution. At the time of the Constitution's drafting, the role of the president was limited to primarily enforcing laws passed by Congress and serving as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The Federalists believed in a strong executive branch, arguing that a single, powerful executive would ensure stability and provide protection against foreign threats. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for tyranny, and advocated for a weaker executive branch with more limited powers.
Over time, the Executive Branch has gained significant powers, particularly in the areas of foreign policy, national security, and economic regulation. For example, since World War II, the president has become the de facto leader of American foreign policy, with the ability to enter into treaties and engage in military conflicts without Congressional approval. Additionally, the president now has significant authority over the economy, including the ability to issue executive orders and direct regulatory agencies.
Given these changes, the Federalists would likely support the modern-day Executive Branch and its expanded powers. They would argue that a strong executive is necessary to protect American interests and ensure stability in a complex world. The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely be wary of the modern-day Executive Branch and its potential for abuse. They would argue that the expanded powers of the presidency undermine the separation of powers and increase the risk of tyranny.
One key legal case that highlights the debate over the powers of the Executive Branch is Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952). In this case, President Truman attempted to seize control of steel mills during the Korean War in order to prevent a labor strike. The Supreme Court ruled that the president did not have the authority to take such action without Congressional approval, citing the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution. This decision supports the Anti-Federalist view that the president's powers should be limited and subject to checks and balances.
Enjoy!
PLEASE HELP ME IM FALLING ALL MY CLASSES ON EDMENTUN WILL GIVE BRAINLYIST PLEASE URGENT
The Trail of Tears
In the 1830s, President Jackson’s removal policies forced many Americans Indian tribes to relocate from their ancestral lands. The Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw traditionally lived in the southeastern regions of the United States. These tribes were forced by the US government to move to an area west of the Mississippi River that came to be known as the Indian Territory. Many died of starvation, cold, and diseases along the journey. This journey became known as the Trail of Tears. The map below shows the routes taken by the American Indian tribes during their relocation to the Indian Territory.
Map of North America shows the Trail of Tears from 1838 to 1839.
Take a look at the following timeline to understand the major events that led to the Trail of Tears.
The Trail of Tears painting by Robert Lindneux shows the forced relocation of Native Americans.
Refer to the websites below to learn more about the Trail of Tears.
A Brief History of the Trail of Tears
The Trail of Tears and the Forced Relocation of the Cherokee Nation
Part A
Question
Select the correct location on the map.
Identify the location of the "Indian Territory" that tribes were forced to relocate to using the Trail of Tears.
Part B
In 1973, Mary Hill of the Muskogee Indian Nation told an interviewer some of the stories her grandmother Sallie Farney had told her about the Trail of Tears. Read the given excerpt from the interview.
The command for a removal came unexpectedly upon most of us…Wagons stopped at our home and the men in charge commanded us to gather what few belongings could be crowded into the wagons. We were to be taken away and leave our homes never to return.
Many fell by the wayside, too faint with hunger or too weak to keep up with the rest. The aged, feeble, and sick were left to perish by the wayside…
The little children piteously cried day after day from weariness, hunger, and illness. Many of the men, women, and even the children were forced to walk…Death stalked at all hours, but there was no time for proper burying of ceremonies… There were several men carrying reeds with eagle feathers attached to the end. These men continually circled around the wagon trains or during the night around the camps. These men said the reeds with feathers had been treated by the medicine men. Their purpose was to encourage the Indians not to be heavy hearted nor to think of the homes that had been left. Some of the older women sang songs that meant, "We are going to our homes and land; there is One who is above and ever watches over us; He will care for us." This song was to encourage the ever downhearted Muskogees.
Based on the excerpt, what physical and emotional challenges did the Muskogee face on the Trail of Tears?
Space used (includes formatting): 119 / 15000
Part C
Examine the image. It's an artist’s representation of the Trail of Tears from a museum in Oklahoma.
an illustration showing the journey of the Cherokee tribe during the Trail of Tears
Now imagine you are leading a group of students around a museum and arrive at this image. Write a brief explanation of what you would tell the students to help them understand the history of this image. Use your interpretation of the image, information from the map above, the tutorials you've completed in this unit, and the sources linked above. Here are some questions to help you get started:
Where did the journey shown most likely begin?
Where are these people going, and why?
What challenges did the people on this journey face, and how did they overcome them?
What most likely happened to these people when they reached their destination?
What historical events motivated this journey?
How did this journey shape history after it?
its b because i know
Explanation:
Who is the president of Kenya who traveled to Great Britain to end British occupation 
Why did some Hebrews move to Egypt?
A) Moses led them there.
B) They needed food.
C) God told them to go to Egypt.
D) God sent terrible plagues.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A shortage of food later forced the Israelites to leave Canaan. Many of them moved to Egypt. Eventually, Egypt's leader, the pharaoh, enslaved them. The Israelites had to work at hard labor.
Specialization includes people who
A. are very good at one skill.
B. grow all their own food.
C. speak one language very well.
D. can solve almost any problem.
Option (a), The only answer to this issue's specialization-related question is that specialization involves individuals who are extremely skilled at a single skill.
What is a person's area of expertise?A specialization in your field of work is a subset of knowledge. Your competency may be tied to your degree program if you completed a double major, a major with a minor, a major with a certification, a major with a topic emphasis, or practical training in a field of study.
What academic field do you concentrate in?A specialization is a specific area of study that is tied to a particular degree and has additional courses. A specialty is a narrowly focused topic of study connected to a particular major that is taken in addition to the courses required for the major.
Learn more about specialization: https://brainly.com/question/28331255
#SPJ1
Which is one ongoing obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestinian Arabs?
A.
Israel will not give up its settlements on the Sinai Peninsula.
B.
Palestinians want to take back land that once belonged to their families.
C.
The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) continues to deny Israel's right to exist.
D.
Egypt has refused to negotiate with Israel.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP!!!
Palestinian refugees' desire to return to the land they fled in Israel is a persistent barrier to peace between Israel and Palestinian Arabs.
What is meant by Palestinian?The term "Palestinian" or "Palestinian people," sometimes known as "Palestinian Arabs," refers to an ethnonational group that is descended from Arab-speaking peoples that have historically occupied the region of Palestine. The Palestinians are an Arab ethnic group that has historically resided in a specific Middle Eastern location. Palestine typically refers to the area that stretches from the Jordan River in the west to the Mediterranean Sea in the east.Palestinians in general, including those abroad, are Muslims. On a government-issued identification card, the Israeli government requires every resident of the Palestinian Territories to list their religion. This information indicates that 98% of Palestinians identify as Sunni Muslims.To learn more about Palestinian, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30634690
Sextus Tarquinius was:
A.one of the kings of Rome
B.the first Tribune of the Plebs
C.a follower of Brutus, who helped him establish the Roman Republic
D.the regent who ruled Rome while Lucius Tarquinius Superbus was away
Answer:
Option A is the correct answer because Sextus Tarquinius was indeed one of the kings of Rome. Sextus Tarquinius was the third and youngest son of Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the seventh and last king of Rome. After the fall of the Roman monarchy, the Roman Republic was established, and the office of the Tribune of the Plebs (option B) was created. However, Sextus Tarquinius did not hold this office. He also was not a follower of Brutus (option C) as he was a member of the Tarquin dynasty and thus an opponent of Brutus, who was instrumental in the establishment of the Roman Republic. Finally, Sextus Tarquinius was not a regent who ruled Rome while Lucius Tarquinius Superbus was away (option D) as he was not a regent but a prince and a general who played a significant role in the history of Rome before being exiled.
Read this passage from a historical narrative about the Enlightenment:
“In the 18th century, an intellectual movement called the Enlightenment started in Europe. The thinkers who made up this movement challenged many traditional European political beliefs. John Locke, for instance, argued that all people had natural rights that no leader could take away. He also suggested that citizens had the right to overthrow
leaders who failed to protect their rights. Other Enlightenment thinkers called for freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and limits on governmental power. These ideas are central to many democratic governments today.”
Which statement best describes the passage's main idea?
A.) Enlightenment thinkers forced their governments to grant citizens freedom of speech.
B.) John Locke was one of the most important Enlightenment thinkers.
C.) The Enlightenment introduced many political ideas that are still relevant today.
D.) The Enlightenment started in Europe during the 18th century.
Answer:
C.) The Enlightenment introduced many political ideas that are still relevant today.
Explanation:
Many of those ideas such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc are political ideas that are still well-kept, well-respected, and understood today. The rest of the answers do not accurately describe the main idea of the ENTIRE passage, and often just highlight one part (ex. the fact of The Enlightenment starting in Europe in the 18th century) instead of creating summary that would accurately "describe the passage's main idea."
Answer: The answer is C
Explanation: It says in the passage, "These ideas are central to many democratic gov. today.", this is what answer C says. It is clear in the text.
By the early 20th century, which Asian nation was the most powerful?
Answer: United States
Explanation: United States remains Asia's most powerful country followed by China, analysis says. New analysis has found the United States remains the most powerful country in Asia, while China's strength has been eroded by its strict COVID-19 lockdowns and border closures.
What was the purpose of the British parliament 1840 act of union ?
The British Parliament's Act of Union of 1840 was a legislative measure that united the two British North American colonies of Upper Canada (now Ontario) and Lower Canada (now Quebec) into the single Province of Canada.
The Act of Union was passed in response to a number of issues that had arisen in the two colonies, including political unrest, economic problems, and cultural tensions between English and French-speaking populations. The British government hoped that unifying the colonies would help to resolve these issues, and create a stronger and more cohesive political entity that could better manage the territory and its resources.
Answer:
it is the first one
Explanation:
I know
describe what the images in the tree of life mosaic tell us about catholic beliefs?
the "tree of life" is a common symbol in many cultures and religions, including Christianity and Catholicism. The symbol represents the interconnectedness of all life, and the belief that all beings are connected to each other and to a higher power or divine force.
what it is about?
In Catholicism specifically, the "tree of life" may represent the belief in the interconnectedness of all creation and the importance of preserving and protecting the natural world.
It may also represent the belief in the interconnectedness of all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, or nationality, and the importance of working towards unity and cooperation among all people.
The specific imagery in a "tree of life" mosaic can vary depending on the artist's interpretation and the intended message.
Some common symbols that may be present in a Catholic "tree of life" mosaic include angels, saints, and other religious figures; animals and plants; and other natural elements such as sun, moon, and stars.
These symbols may be used to convey different aspects of Catholic beliefs and teachings, such as the importance of faith, the beauty and complexity of the natural world, and the role of divine intervention in the lives of believers.
To know more religion related questions, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30228180
#SPJ1
In western African culture, a griot is a person who:
A. combines European, Muslim, and indigenous African art styles.
B. tells stories from local history through poetry and dance.
C. cooks traditional meals including fufu and maffe.
D. builds rural housing using only mud and straw.
Answer:
In western African culture, a griot is a person who tells stories from local history through poetry, music, and dance. Griots are considered to be oral historians, preserving the traditions and cultural heritage of their community through their performances. They often have a close relationship with the ruling families and serve as advisors and confidants. Griots are found in many West African countries, including Senegal, Mali, Guinea, and Gambia.
Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev put forth the Brezhnev Doctrine, which stated that any threat to
Europe would require intervention by fellow states.
:: Eastern :: socialist :: Southern
:: capitalist :: communist
rule in Central and
:: Northern
The Brezhnev Doctrine was a foreign policy doctrine introduced by Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev in 1968.
What was Brezhnev Doctrine?The Brezhnev Doctrine was a Soviet foreign policy that stated that once a country had become a socialist state, it could not be allowed to return to capitalism. It was announced by Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev in 1968, following the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, as a response to the Prague Spring reform movement. The doctrine asserted that the Soviet Union had the right to intervene in any socialist country that was threatened by counter-revolution or foreign intervention. The Brezhnev Doctrine effectively justified Soviet intervention in the internal affairs of other countries and helped to maintain the Soviet Union's influence over Eastern Europe during the Cold War. It remained in effect until the late 1980s, when Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev began to implement policies of perestroika and glasnost.
To learn more about Brezhnev Doctrine, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1338123
#SPJ9
The American-supported leaders of the Republic of South Vietnam had difficulty maintaining order in the late 1950s and early 60s because
a. All of these.
b. The North Vietnamese gave aid and support to a southern insurgency group called the Viet Cong.
c. They were repressing of opposing elements who wanted more democracy.
d. They were Catholics in a primarily Buddhist country.
In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Republic of South Vietnam's American-backed officials struggled to maintain order because of all of these
What caused Vietnam to divide into two nations?Following the separation of Vietnam in 1954, the southern region became a part of the Western Bloc during a time of the Cold War, and from 1955 to 1975, South Vietnam, formally the Republic of Vietnam, was a country in Southeast Asia. The Communist Party of Vietnam has been in power in Vietnam's one-party system for many years (CPV). The majority of independent candidates are prohibited in practise, despite the fact that some are legally permitted to participate in parliamentary elections. Activism in civic society, freedom of speech, and religious freedom are all severely constrained. At the end of World War II and the fall of the monarchy in Vietnam, France made an effort to re-establish colonial power but was ultimately defeated in the First Indo-China War.To learn more about Republic of South Vietnam, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/22982563
Explain the purpose of national conventions in the election process.
Answer:
National conventions are a significant part of the election process in the United States, as they provide an opportunity for political parties to formally nominate their candidate for president and vice-president. The conventions are typically held every four years, during the summer before the general election in November.
The purpose of national conventions is to bring together the delegates from each state and territory who have been chosen to represent their party in the selection of the presidential nominee. During the convention, delegates cast their votes to determine the nominee, with the winning candidate requiring a majority of the votes.
In addition to the formal nomination process, national conventions also serve as a platform for political parties to outline their platform and agenda for the upcoming election. Key figures within the party, including elected officials, party leaders, and prominent members, may give speeches and address the convention to rally support for the nominee and unify the party.
Overall, the purpose of national conventions is to formally nominate the party's candidate for president and vice-president, as well as to set the agenda and platform for the party going into the general election. They also provide an opportunity for party members and delegates to come together and unify behind their candidate.
Explanation:
NEED QUICKLY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEDT
The South Korean film Parasite won the Academy Award (Oscar) for best picture. Which of the following types of convergence best describes this?
Technological
International
Cultural
Economic
Cultural convergence best describes the success of the South Korean film Parasite at the Academy Awards. Cultural convergence refers to the merging and blending of different cultures, ideas, and values, resulting in the emergence of new cultural norms and practices. In this case, the success of a South Korean film at one of the most prestigious award ceremonies in Hollywood represents a significant convergence of Korean and Western cultures. The film's storyline, themes, and characters were highly relatable and resonated with audiences across different cultures, leading to its recognition as the best picture. The success of Parasite highlights the power of cultural convergence and the growing influence of non-Western cultures in shaping global trends and cultural practices.
describes direct democracy. What is direct democracy and what are the three methods of implementing direct democracy? Be sure to briefly explain how the three methods of direct democracy work.
Direct democracy, often known as pure democracy, is a type of democracy whereby the people makes decisions about major policy matters without the assistance of elected officials.
What is a straightforward explanation of democracy?As "democracy" is derived from the Greek terms "demos," which means "people," and "kratos," which means "power," democracy may be defined as a form of government that is based on the desire of the people.
How do democracy and dictatorship differ?Democracy is a form of government where representatives are selected by the general populace or other qualified state citizens. A dictator is a system of governance in which one person or a small number of individuals exercise absolute control over all other citizens.
To know more about democracy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28478990
#SPJ1
Are there any requirements to be president that you don’t agree with? Why? Should we add any requirements?
According to the Constitution, an individual must be a natural-born citizen, be at least 35 years old, and have lived in the country for at least 14 years in order to be eligible to serve as President of the United States.
Are there any requirements to be president that you don’t agree with?The qualifications have not altered since the Constitution was enacted in 1788, despite the fact that some people may question the necessity of some conditions, such as the requirement that a person be a natural-born citizen. There have been some suggestions to include more criteria, like having previous military or government experience or having a specific degree of education. But, because enacting a constitutional amendment is a complex and drawn-out procedure, these suggestions have not garnered much traction. The criteria for becoming president of the United States have generally survived the test of time, and any revisions would necessitate thorough analysis and discussion.
To Know more about Constitution Visit:
brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
why would Ford have a hard time winning in the election of 1976 ?
Explanation and Answer: (down)
What did President Ford do in 1976?
In the 1976 Republican presidential primary campaign, Ford defeated former California Governor Ronald Reagan for the Republican nomination, but narrowly lost the presidential election to the Democratic challenger, former Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter.
#carryonlearning
2) According to lines 3 and 4, what was the Stamp Act taxing?
Answer:
The Stamp Act of 1765 was when Great Britain attempted to raise revenue in the American Colonies. America was a colony from Great Britain, and that time there was an economic theory called Mercantilism, which states that there is a set amount of wealth in the world, and one country's gain is immediately another country's loss. With this, countries rushed to get as much bullion(physical gold and silver, basically riches) as possible. When the Americas were discovered, colonies were formed to get the resources there. The sole purpose of colonies was to benefit the mother country. Anyways, when Great Britain wanted to raise revenue from their colonies in the Americas, the Americans (colonists) protested. The Stamp Act were heavy handed taxes, and as a result, people rioted in the streets. Now you may be wondering why Britain needed to raise revenue in the first place. The first global conflict was the Seven Year's War, in which France and Great Britain fought. It was costly, and as a result, Great Britain needed money. So, they started to tax their American Colonies. Then, in 1773, Britain imposed the Tea Act, which was basically a new tax. You may know how people dressed up as the Indigenous Americans (They were a group called the Sons of Liberty) and tossed British tea from their ships into the Boston Harbor. As a result, the Intolerable, or Coercive Acts were announced in 1774, expanding the power of the royal governor, curtailed local elections, and closed Boston's harbor. Then in September of 1774, the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia decided not to allow concessions to the Crown of Great Britain anymore. Fighting began the following year in April, in Lexington and Concord. The Second Continental Congress in 1776 adopted the Declaration of Independence, declaring the sovereignty of the American states. Later, in 1777, some French volunteers arrived in support. In 1778, France allied itself with America, as well as Spain, the Dutch, declaring war on Great Britain in 1779 and 1780. In 1783 with the Treaty of Paris, Britain recognized the independence of what is now America.
Explanation:
Note: I may be young but this information is accurate. I know a lot of stuff, so you can trust me :)
When there is a surplus of food,
A. extra food spoils.
B. people wait in line for food.
C. families have extra food.
D. not enough rain falls to grow food.
When there is a surplus of food, families have extra food.
Meaning the answer is "C. families have extra food."
Help please hurry! When Jesus Christ returns, He will come suddenly. Luke 17:31-34 states, "In that day, he which shall be upon the housetop, and his stuff in the house, let him not come down to take it away: and he that is in the field, let him likewise not return back. Remember Lot's wife. Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it. I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left." How can a sudden return occur during both the daytime and nighttime? (Use complete sentences).
Answer:
According to Luke 17:31-34, Jesus Christ will return suddenly. During this time, people will not have the opportunity to take their possessions or return home. The verse also warns people to remember Lot's wife, who turned back and was turned into a pillar of salt.
Moreover, the verse emphasizes that those who seek to save their lives will lose it, and those who lose their lives will preserve it. This means that people should not be attached to material possessions and worldly desires.
Furthermore, the verse mentions that the sudden return of Jesus Christ will happen during both the daytime and nighttime. In that night, some people will be taken, while others will be left behind.
In conclusion, the sudden return of Jesus Christ is a significant event that will happen unexpectedly. It is essential to be prepared spiritually and not be attached to worldly possessions.
Explanation:
Write a short Valentine's Day pick-up line that explains who Elizabeth Cady Stanton was or why she is significant.
Example for John Muir: ''I pine for you, Valentine! Let's stick together.''
Explanation:
"Happy Valentine's Day, love. You light up my world like Elizabeth Cady Stanton lit up the women's rights movement."
The president’s cabinet consists of
Question 38 options:
a)
the informal advisers who work with the president to guide and shape their agenda, such as the chief of staff.
b)
the leaders of organizations within the Executive Office of the President.
c)
the four top leaders in Congress and the chief justice of the Supreme Court.
d)
the secretaries (leaders) of the departments of the executive branch.
Answer: D.
Explanation: I would guess D.
Cherokee fight for the United States in the War of 1812.
The Supreme Court says Georgia's Native American laws are
unconstitutional.
Jackson supports the Indian Removal Act with force.
SUBMIT
These three events are connected and represent a complex and often tragic history of Native American relations with the United States.
What happened in the war of 1812?In the War of 1812, the Cherokee fought alongside the United States in hopes of securing their land and autonomy from European and American encroachment. Despite their service, however, the U.S. government continued to pursue policies that sought to strip Native American nations of their land and culture.
One example of this was Georgia's attempt to exert control over Cherokee lands and people through a series of laws and policies that were deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Worcester v. Georgia (1832). However, despite the Court's ruling, Georgia continued to ignore the decision and seek to displace the Cherokee from their ancestral lands
This paved the way for President Andrew Jackson's support of the Indian Removal Act, which sought to forcibly relocate Native American nations, including the Cherokee, to lands west of the Mississippi River. This policy led to the tragic and devastating forced removal of thousands of Cherokee and other Native Americans on what became known as the Trail of Tears.
Learn more about Cherokee fight at:
https://brainly.com/question/22640718
#SPJ1
a country experiences hyperinflation when:
Answer: prices have risen by more than 50% per month
Explanation: Can U give me brainilst
3. Once an authoritarian ruler takes power, what are methods they usually use to stay in power?
Political repression and the exclusion of potential challengers are hallmarks of authoritarianism, which is characterized by highly concentrated and centralized government power.
Who is in charge in a dictatorial government?An authoritarian government has complete control over the economic, social, and political lives of its citizens. Power is moved in the possession of one or a couple of individuals; It is against the law and frequently comes with severe consequences to oppose the government. The people have sovereignty and democracy. Divergent viewpoints are not tolerated by leaders. Illegitimate means are often used by leaders to gain power. A single leader or a group with a lot of power rules. Divergent viewpoints are not tolerated by leaders. Leaders make decisions without their followers or team members' creative input or participation. Policies and procedures are overseen by leaders on their own. The leader always has direct control over the group members.
To learn more about authoritarian visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30019371
#SPJ1
how were people able to get land for free
Answer: The Homestead Act
Explanation:
The Homestead Act, enacted during the Civil War in 1862, provided that any adult citizen, or intended citizen, who had never borne arms against the U.S. government could claim 160 acres of surveyed government land. Claimants were required to live on and “improve” their plot by cultivating the land.
I. Sabine Pass
II. Palmito Ranch
III. Red River campaign
IV. Galveston
What is the correct sequence for the above battles in the Civil War?
Answer: II. Palmito Ranch
Explanation: The Battle of Palmito Ranch, also known as the Battle of Palmito Hill, is considered by some criteria the final battle of the American Civil War
How did Joan of Arc influence the Hundred Years’ War?
Who is this actor?
Look at all the images/ Look at her amazing transformation.
Look her up and give he 3 facts about her please!
Answer:
Reese Witherspoon.
esponsa maranda
Explanation: