Randi is applying for a job at a tech start-up. She has been told that it is a pretty casual workplace. Should she still dress professionally for her interview?
A.
No, if it is a causal workplace, jeans and a t-shirt are probably fine.
B.
Yes, but only if the employer tells her to when she sets up the interview.
C.
No, what a potential employee wears to an interview really does not matter.
D.
Yes, employees should demonstrate their understanding of professional standards.
D. Even if she has been told that the workplace is very informal, staff should nonetheless show that they understand professional standards.
Why is it crucial to dress appropriately for an interview?Making a good first impression begins with having a tidy, professional appearance. The interviewer should pay attention to you and your skills, not your attire, of course. Dress in a way that reflects your desire to be perceived as a successful, professional, and the kind of person that the company wants to represent it.
Why is it crucial to act professionally at work?Professional conduct helps keep personal and professional relationships separate and limits interactions to the current business context. A judge cannot, for instance, speak with a plaintiff or defendant on a personal level.
To know more about Dressing Professionally visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15375124
#SPJ1
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce (excerpt) It was Wells who had shouldered him into the square ditch the day before because he would not swop his little snuff box for Wells's seasoned hacking chestbut, the conqueror of forty. It was a mean thing to do; all the fellows said it was. And how cold and slimy the water had been! And a fellow had once seen a big rat jump plop into the scom. The cold slime of the ditch covered his whole body, and, when the bell rang for study and the lines filed out of the playrooms, he felt the cold air of the corridor and staircase inside his clothes. Select the correct answer. What does the sensory language in the excerpt convey about Stephen's feelings? A. It shows the ridicule and humiliation Stephen feels after wells throws him into the ditch B. It shows the vengefulness Stephen feels because of wells actions twords him C. It shows stephan intense desire to run away after being humiliated by wells. D. It shows the cruelty of the pecking order among the boys at school​
Answer:
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. It shows the ridicule and humiliation Stephen feels after Wells throws him into the ditch. The sensory language used in the passage, such as "cold and slimy," "the cold slime of the ditch covered his whole body," and "the cold air of the corridor and staircase inside his clothes," conveys a sense of physical discomfort and unpleasantness that Stephen experiences as a result of being thrown into the ditch. The use of sensory language helps the reader to better understand and empathize with Stephen's feelings of ridicule and humiliation.
Please help me
Consider this claim: Students who do not have at least a 3.0 GPA should not be allowed to have after-school jobs because they need to spend more time studying.
Use the 5-step process to write a counterclaim. (10 points)
1. Complete the following sentence: The claim states that ...
2. Cross out "The claim states that." What remains is your clearly stated position.
3. Complete the following sentence: Some may disagree because ...
4. Cross out "Some may disagree because." What remains is your purpose for writing.
5. Combine these two thoughts; this is your claim and your counterclaim.
Answer:
The claim states that students who do not have at least a 3.0 GPA should not be allowed to have after-school jobs because they need to spend more time studyingStudents with a GPA lower than 3.0 should be allowed to have after-school jobs.Some may disagree because they believe that having a job can teach important life skills, such as time management and responsibility, that cannot be learned in the classroom. Additionally, some students may need to work to support themselves or their families, and preventing them from doing so could cause financial hardship.My purpose for writing is to present a counterargument against the claim that students with a GPA lower than 3.0 should not be allowed to have after-school jobs, and to highlight the potential benefits and necessity of such employment for some students.While maintaining a certain level of academic performance is important, it is not necessarily a prerequisite for having an after-school job. Allowing students with lower GPAs to work can provide valuable opportunities for them to develop important life skills and earn money to support themselves or their families. Therefore, prohibiting these students from having after-school jobs solely based on their GPA may not be fair or necessary.