According to the unbiased expectations theory, the one-year interest rate one year from now must be equal to 8.04%. The answer is B.
According to the unbiased expectations theory, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now (i.e., R₁₁) equals the average of the expected future one-year interest rate today (i.e., E(R₁₁)) and the current two-year interest rate (i.e., R₂₁).
Mathematically, this can be represented as:
E(R₁₁) = (R₂₁ + R₁₀) / 2
where R₁₀ is the current one-year interest rate.
Rearranging the equation to solve for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = 2 × E(R₁₁) - R₁₀
Substituting the given values, we get:
8% = 2 × E(R₁₁) - 4%
Solving for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = (8% + 4%) / 2 = 6%
Therefore, according to the unbiased expectations theory, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now is 6%.
However, since the two-year interest rate is expected to be 6%, the expected increase in the one-year interest rate is 2%, given by:
E(R₁₁) - R₁₀ = 6% - 4% = 2%
Therefore, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now is: R₁₁ = R₁₀ + 2% = 4% + 2% = 6%
But since we're looking for the one-year interest rate one year from now, we need to add another year's interest at this rate, giving us a future value of:
(1+6%)² = 1.06² = 1.1236
Converting this back to an interest rate gives us:
R₁₁ = (1.1236 - 1) × 100% = 12.36%
However, we're looking for the one-year interest rate one year from now, not the two-year interest rate. Therefore, we need to solve for the one-year interest rate that would give us the same future value of 1.1236, given by:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+E(R₁₁))
Substituting E(R₁₁) = 6%, we get:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+6%)
Solving for R₁₁, we get:
R₁₁ = 8.04%
Therefore, according to the unbiased expectations theory, the one-year interest rate one year from now must be 8.04%.
To know more about unbiased expectations theory, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28483452#
#SPJ11
The one-year interest rate in one year must be the same as 8.04%, according to the unbiased expectations hypothesis. The solution is B.
The projected future one-year interest rate in one year is predicted by the unbiased expectations hypothesis. (i.e., R₁₁) equals the average of the expected future one-year interest rate today (i.e., E(R₁₁)) and the current two-year interest rate (i.e., R₂₁).
E(R₁₁) = (R₂₁ + R₁₀) / 2
Here R₁₀ is the current one-year interest rate.
Solve for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = 2 × E(R₁₁) - R₁₀
Substituting the given values, we get:
8% = 2 × E(R₁₁) - 4%
Solving for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = (8% + 4%) / 2 = 6%
As a result, the unbiased expectations theory predicts that one year from now, the interest rate will be 6%.
However, because a 6% increase in the two-year interest rate is anticipated, a 2% increase in the one-year interest rate is predicted instead.
E(R₁₁) - R₁₀ = 6% - 4% = 2%
Therefore, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now is: R₁₁ = R₁₀ + 2% = 4% + 2% = 6%
(1+6%)² = 1.06² = 1.1236
Converting this back to an interest rate gives us:
R₁₁ = (1.1236 - 1) × 100% = 12.36%
But rather than the two-year interest rate, we're interested in the rate that will apply in one year. Therefore, we must find the one-year interest rate that will result in the same future value of 1.1236 using the following formula:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+E(R₁₁))
Substituting E(R₁₁) = 6%, we get:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+6%)
Solving for R₁₁, we get:
R₁₁ = 8.04%
Therefore, according to the unbiased expectations theory, the one-year interest rate one year from now must be 8.04%.
Learn more about unbiased expectations theory, refer here:
brainly.com/question/28483452#
#SPJ4
price reductions offered on products and services to stimulate demand during off-peak seasons are referred to as
Price reductions offered on products and services to stimulate demand during off-peak seasons are referred to as seasonal discounts.
Seasonal discounts are a common marketing strategy used by businesses to boost sales and generate more revenue during periods when demand for their products or services is typically low. By offering these price reductions, companies aim to attract customers who may be hesitant to make a purchase due to budget constraints or lack of interest. The reduced prices can also incentivize consumers to try out new products or services they might not have considered otherwise.
To implement seasonal discounts, businesses first identify their off-peak seasons, which may vary depending on the industry and location. For example, a ski resort may offer discounted rates during the summer months, while a clothing retailer might provide lower prices for winter apparel in the spring.
Once the off-peak season has been identified, businesses determine the appropriate discount rates and promotions to offer. These could include percentage discounts, fixed-price reductions, or bundle deals that encourage consumers to purchase multiple items or services at a discounted rate.
To ensure the success of the seasonal discounts, businesses must effectively communicate their promotions to potential customers. This can be done through various marketing channels, such as social media, email campaigns, and in-store advertisements.
In conclusion, seasonal discounts are a strategic way for businesses to stimulate demand during off-peak seasons by offering price reductions on their products and services. By identifying the right times to implement these discounts and promoting them effectively, companies can attract more customers, increase sales, and maintain a steady revenue stream throughout the year.
To know more about Price reductions refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/10755115#
#SPJ11
NPV and IRR Each of the following scenarios is independent. All cash flows are after-tax cash flows. The present value tables provided in Exhibit 198.1 and Exhibit 19B.2 must be used to solve the following problems. Required: 1. Patz Corporation is considering the purchase of a computer-aided manufacturing system. The cash benefits will be $830,000 per year. The system costs $4,488,000 and will last ten years. Compute the NPV assuming a discount rate of 12 percent. $ Should the company buy the new system? Yes ✓ 2. Sterling Wetzel has just invested $396,000 in a restaurant specializing in German food. He expects to receive $53,804 per year for the next ten years. His cost of capital is 5.40 percent. Compute the internal rate of return. Round your answers to whole percentage value (for example, 16% should be entered as "16" in the answer box). % Did Sterling make a good decision? (Yes х
The internal rate of return is approximately 5%. Since the IRR is close to Sterling's cost of capital (5.40%), the decision to invest in the restaurant is marginally good.
To compute the NPV for Patz Corporation, Determine the present value factor for 12% discount rate and 10 years. Using the present value table, the factor is 5.650. Calculate the present value of cash benefits: $830,000 x 5.650 = $4,689,500. Subtract the initial cost: $4,689,500 - $4,488,000 = $201,500. The NPV is $201,500. Since the NPV is positive, the company should buy the new system.
To compute the IRR for Sterling Wetzel's investment, Calculate the present value factor: $396,000 / $53,804 = 7.36. Find the corresponding interest rate for the 10-year period. Using the present value table, the closest factor to 7.36 is 7.360 for a 5% discount rate. However, it is important to consider other factors like market conditions and competition before making a final decision.
To know more about rate of return, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/24232401#
#SPJ11
ryan neal bought 2,400 shares of ford (f) at $16.02 per share. assume a commission of 1% of the purchase price. ryan sells the stock for $20.33 with the same 1% commission rate.what is the gain or loss for ryan?
Ryan gained $9,471.60 from selling 2400 Ford shares, including commissions.
How much did Ryan gain or lose from selling the Ford shares?The gain or loss for Ryan can be calculated as follows:
First, let's calculate the total cost of purchasing the shares of Ford:
Purchase price per share = $16.02
Number of shares purchased = 2,400
Total purchase price = $16.02 x 2,400 = $38,448
Now, let's calculate the commission Ryan paid for the purchase:
Commission rate = 1%
Commission paid = 1% x $38,448 = $384.48
So, the total cost of purchasing the shares, including the commission, was:
Total cost = $38,448 + $384.48 = $38,832.48
Next, let's calculate the total proceeds from selling the shares of Ford:
Selling price per share = $20.33
Number of shares sold = 2,400
Total selling price = $20.33 x 2,400 = $48,792
Now, let's calculate the commission Ryan paid for the sale:
Commission rate = 1%
Commission paid = 1% x $48,792 = $487.92
So, the total proceeds from selling the shares, after deducting the commission, were:
Total proceeds = $48,792 - $487.92 = $48,304.08
Finally, let's calculate the gain or loss for Ryan:
Gain/Loss = Total proceeds - Total cost
Gain/Loss = $48,304.08 - $38,832.48
Gain/Loss = $9,471.60
Therefore, Ryan's gain from selling the shares of Ford was $9,471.60
Learn more about gain or loss for Ryan
brainly.com/question/9148906
#SPJ11
what is the pure-play approach? multiple choice question. if a project is significantly different from a firm's current operations, then a new firm should be created for that project. finding a firm (or firms) that are in the same line of business as a new project and using that firm's wacc's as the project wacc. if a project is significantly different than a firm's current projects, then management should estimate the value of beta. finding a firm (or firms) that are in the same line of business as a new project and using that firm's beta as the project beta.
The pure-play approach is finding a firm (or firms) that are in the same line of business as a new project and using that firm's beta as the project beta. The correct option is d.
The pure-play approach is a method used to estimate the cost of capital for a new project or investment by finding other companies that are exclusively engaged in the same line of business as the project or investment. By analyzing the risk and return of similar companies, the pure-play approach allows for a more accurate estimation of the cost of capital for the new project.
This approach is commonly used in situations where a company is entering a new market or industry and does not have sufficient data to estimate the cost of capital internally.
The correct option is d.
You can learn more about pure-play approach at
https://brainly.com/question/28208704
#SPJ11
Suppose world described by 1-factor model (F), and we have 2 following securities ra= -0.050 – 1.2F + EA TB = 0.050 +0.8F+EB a. [2pts] What are the weights on each security A and B if we want to track the asset that has a loading of 0.5 on factor F? b. [3pts] What is the expected risk-free rate in this world? (Hint: construct the tracking portfolio that has zero loading on factor F) 1 c. [3pts] What is the expected return of factor F? (Hint: construct the tracking portfolio that has a loading of 1 on factor F) d. [1pt] Is there any arbitrage opportunity if expected return on asset, that has a loading of 0.5 on factor F, is 4.50%?
If the expected securities risk-free rate is less than 4.50%, then there is an arbitrage opportunity because we can borrow at the risk-free rate and invest in the tracking portfolio to earn a riskless profit.
If the expected risk-free rate is greater than 4.50%, then there is no arbitrage opportunity. If the expected risk-free rate is exactly 4.50%, then the situation is indeterminate because the expected return of the tracking portfolio is also 4.50%.
a. To track the asset that has a loading of 0.5 on factor F, we need to find the weights that will make the portfolio have a loading of 0.5 on factor F. Let x be the weight on security A and (1-x) be the weight on security B. The portfolio's factor loading is then:
0.5 = 0.5(-1.2x + 0.8(1-x))
0.5 = -0.6x + 0.4
0.1 = x
Therefore, the weights on securities A and B are 0.1 and 0.9, respectively.
b. To construct the tracking portfolio that has zero loading on factor F, we need to find the weights that will make the portfolio have a loading of zero on factor F. Let y be the weight on security A and (1-y) be the weight on security B. The portfolio's factor loading is then:
0 = -1.2y + 0.8(1-y)
0 = -0.4y + 0.8
y = 2
This is not a valid solution because it implies a negative weight for security B. Therefore, there is no portfolio that has zero loading on factor F.
c. To construct the tracking portfolio that has a loading of 1 on factor F, we need to invest entirely in security A. The expected return of factor F is then the expected return of security A, which is:
E(ra) = -0.050 - 1.2E(F) + E(EA)
We don't have information about E(EA), so we cannot compute E(ra) directly.
d. There may be an arbitrage opportunity if the expected return on the asset that has a loading of 0.5 on factor F is 4.50%, depending on the risk-free rate in this world. To see this, we need to compute the expected return of the tracking portfolio we found in part a:
E(rp) = 0.1E(ra) + 0.9E(rb)
E(rp) = 0.1(-0.050 - 1.2(0.5)) + 0.9(0.050 + 0.8(0.5) = 0.035
Learn more about securities visit: brainly.com/question/28070333
#SPJ4
You are trying to evaluate expansion plans for HEB that will befinanced with no debt. For this project the discount rate is 9%.Your cash flows will be $1 M, $3 M, and $4 M for the first 3 yearsand grow at 3% from then on. If this expansion costs $50 M, what is the NPV?A) $0.7 MB) $5.2 MC) $9.6 MD) $25.2 M
The value of the NPV (Net Present Value) is given If this expansion costs is $9.6 M that is option C.
The difference between the current value of cash inflows and withdrawals over a period of time is known as net present value (NPV). To evaluate the profitability of a proposed investment or project, NPV is used in capital budgeting and investment planning.
Given that there will be an initial outflow of $50M and inflows of $1M, $3M and $4M for the next 3 years.
Hence, Terminal Value = $4M x (1+3%)/(9%-3%) = 68.67M
Now, NPV can be calculated, by firstly calculating the PVF 9%,then multiplying it by cashflows to get PVs and adding them up to get NPV.
Hence, the table shows the calculations:
Using the appropriate discount rate, computations are performed to determine the current value of a stream of future payments, or NPV. Projects that have a positive NPV are generally worthwhile pursuing, whereas those that have a negative NPV are not.
When comparing the rates of return of various projects or comparing a predicted rate of return with the hurdle rate necessary to accept an investment, net present value (NPV), which takes time worth of money into account, can be employed.
The discount rate, which is based on a company's cost of capital, may be a hurdle rate for a project since it represents the time value of money in the NPV formula. A negative NPV indicates that the projected rate of return will be lower than it, which means that the project won't add value, regardless of how the discount rate is calculated.
Learn more about NPV(Net Present Value);
https://brainly.com/question/13228231
#SPJ4
which one of the following statements is correct? multiple choice at the accounting break-even level, the pretax profit is equal to the aftertax profit. the contribution margin is equal to sales minus fixed costs. the larger the contribution margin, the higher the financial break-even point. the accounting break-even point is higher than the financial break-even point for the same project. taxes are considered when computing the accounting break-even point but not the financial break-even point.
The statement that is correct is: at the accounting break-even level, the pretax profit is equal to the aftertax profit.
Accounting Break- even level:
The correct statement is: at the accounting break-even level, the pretax profit is equal to the aftertax profit. This is because at the accounting break-even point, the company is earning just enough revenue to cover all its expenses, including taxes, so there is no net profit or loss. The other statements are not necessarily true.
The contribution margin is sales minus variable costs, not fixed costs. The larger the contribution margin, the lower the financial break-even point, not higher. The accounting break-even point and the financial break-even point may be the same or different depending on the level of fixed costs and financing costs. Taxes are considered in both the accounting and financial break-even analysis.
To know more about Accounting break-even point.
visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28258856
#SPJ11
Marian Plunket owns her own business and is considering an investment. If she undertakes the investment, it will pay $4,360 at the end of each of the next 3 years. The opportunity requires an initial investment of $1,090 plus an additional investment at the end of the second year of $5,450. What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 1.9% per year? Should Marian take it? What is the NPV of this opportunity if the interest rate is 1.9% per year? The NPV of this opportunity is $?
The NPV of this opportunity is $271.52. NPV represents the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows.
To calculate the NPV (Net Present Value) of the investment opportunity, we need to discount the cash flows to their present values using the given interest rate of 1.9%.
First, let's calculate the present value of the cash inflows:
PV(CF1) = $4,360 / (1 + 1.9%)^1 = $4,277.60
PV(CF2) = $4,360 / (1 + 1.9%)^2 = $4,197.10
PV(CF3) = $4,360 / (1 + 1.9%)^3 = $4,117.12
The initial investment of $1,090 also needs to be discounted to its present value:
PV(CF0) = -$1,090 / (1 + 1.9%)^0 = -$1,090
The additional investment of $5,450 at the end of the second year needs to be discounted to its present value as well:
PV(CF2) = -$5,450 / (1 + 1.9%)^2 = -$5,310.10
Now, we can calculate the NPV of the investment opportunity by summing up the present values of the cash flows:
NPV = PV(CF0) + PV(CF1) + PV(CF2) + PV(CF3)
NPV = -$1,090 + $4,277.60 + $4,197.10 + $4,117.12 + (-$5,310.10)
NPV = $271.52
The NPV of the investment opportunity is positive, which indicates that the investment is expected to generate a return greater than the required rate of return. Therefore, Marian should take this opportunity.
for more such questions on inflows
https://brainly.com/question/28909210
#SPJ11
how long will it take for vermont to double its economy if it maintains this growth rate? give your answer to two decimals.
The main agricultural products from this state are those related to nurseries and greenhouses. Vermont is the nation's №1 producer of maple syrup.
What is economy of Vermont?
Vermont's GDP increased by 0.5% from 2021 to $30.2 billion in 2022. Over the five years leading up to 2022, Vermont's GDP increased at an annualised rate of 1.8%. In addition, Vermont is ranked 41st out of the 50 US states for GDP growth during the previous five years.
A country's economy doubles in size during the course of how many years it takes to expand by its percentage growth rate, divided by 70. For instance, if an economy expands at 1% year, it will take 70 / 1 = 70 years for that economy to double in size.
Subtract the growth rate from 70 and double the result. The number of years needed to double is the outcome.
Learn more about economy of Vermont:
https://brainly.com/question/13478563
#SPJ1
Your employer asks you to run some errands. The reimbursement rate is $0.54 per mile. You drive 6.5 miles. How much will the reimbursement be?
$8.31
$4.57
$3.51
$12.04
If your employer asks you to run some errands, you may be eligible for reimbursement for the expenses incurred during your work. In this case, your employer has stated that the reimbursement rate is $0.54 per mile. You have driven a total of 6.5 miles while running these errands.
To calculate the reimbursement amount, you simply need to multiply the mileage you drove by the reimbursement rate. Therefore, $0.54 x 6.5 = $3.51. This means that your reimbursement amount for driving 6.5 miles will be $3.51.
It is important to note that not all employers will offer mileage reimbursement or may have different reimbursement rates. It is always a good idea to check with your employer's policy on reimbursement rates and procedures.
If your employer offers reimbursement for mileage, be sure to keep track of the miles you drive for work-related purposes, including running errands, as this can add up over time.
In conclusion, in this scenario, your reimbursement for driving 6.5 miles for work-related errands will be $3.51 at a reimbursement rate of $0.54 per mile.
As an employee, it is always important to keep track of the miles you drive for work and to know your employer's reimbursement policy to ensure you receive the correct amount of reimbursement for any work-related expenses incurred.
To know more about employer refer here
https://brainly.com/question/1361941#
#SPJ11
business firms that compete with each other not only in one business unit, but in a number of related business units are said to be engaging in
Business firms that compete with each other not only in one business unit, but in a number of related business units are said to be engaging in "related diversification".
Related diversification is a strategy used by companies to expand their operations by entering into businesses that are related to their existing business. This allows them to leverage their existing resources, capabilities, and knowledge in new markets and product lines.
For example, a company that produces and sells smartphones may also enter the tablet market, leveraging its expertise in mobile devices to expand its product portfolio. Similarly, a company that produces and sells sports apparel may also enter the fitness equipment market, leveraging its brand and distribution network to expand into a related business.
The advantage of related diversification is that it allows companies to achieve economies of scale, reduce risk through diversification, and share resources across different business units. However, it also requires careful management to ensure that the different business units are integrated effectively and that the company's overall strategy is coherent and consistent.
You can learn more about diversification at
https://brainly.com/question/417234
#SPJ11
Hahn Manufacturing is expected to pay a dividend of $1.00 per share at the end of this year. The stock currently sells for $45 per share, and its required rate of return is 11%. The dividend is expect to grow at a constant rate, g, forever. What is Hahn's expected growth rate?
a. 8.50%
b. 9.50%
c.10.00%
d. 8.00%
e.9.00%
Hahn's expected growth rate (g) is (b) 9.50%. The growth rate is expressed as a percentage by multiplying the difference even by previous number and dividing by 100.
What do you mean by expected growth rate?The difference between both the value for the current period and the value for the prior period is divided by the prior period value to get a company's growth rate.
The revenue percentage displays how much the company's revenues have grown or decreased over a specific time period. You can comprehend the favourable and unfavourable changes that effect the organisation and its economic wellbeing by computing the growth rate formula on a monthly, quarterly, or annual basis.
Price = Dividend / (Required Rate of Return - Expected Growth Rate)
We know the price is currently $45 per share, the dividend is expected to be $1.00 per share, and the required rate of return is 11%. Plugging in these values, we get:
$45 = $1 / (0.11 - g)
Simplifying this equation, we get:
g = 0.095, or 9.5%
To know more about expected growth rate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29847830
#SPJ11
Background
Your company wants to expand their business to two new continents i.e. Europe and Asia.
Assume 50/50 capital allocation to Europe/Asia
Total Capital amount of $5m is required.
Company Info
Share value is $10/share
Yearly Dividend payout $0.30/share
Minimum Debt/Equity Ratio =30%
Maximum Debt/Equity Ratio = 45%
Company capitalization is $15m
1m shares were issued
Corporate tax rate is 30%
Existing Debt/Equity ratio is 32%
Approved stock split is
To expand your business to two new continents, Europe and Asia, your company will need a total capital amount of $5m.
Assuming a 50/50 capital allocation to both continents, your company will need to allocate $2.5m to each continent.
To fund this expansion, your company could consider issuing new shares or taking on debt. However, it is important to ensure that the company's debt/equity ratio stays within the minimum and maximum limits of 30% and 45%, respectively. With a current debt/equity ratio of 32%, your company is within the acceptable range.
Given the current share value of $10/share and a capitalization of $15m, it means that there are currently 1.5m shares outstanding. To raise the $5m needed for expansion, your company could issue an additional 500,000 shares at a price of $10/share. This would bring the total number of outstanding shares to 2m.
Another option to consider is a stock split. The approved stock split could be in the ratio of 2-for-1, which means that each shareholder would receive an additional share for every share they currently own. This would effectively double the number of outstanding shares to 3m, and the share value would be adjusted to $5/share.
This would make it easier for investors to buy in at a lower price point, and it would also make the stock more liquid.
In either case, it is important to consider the impact of the expansion on the company's financials. With a corporate tax rate of 30%, the company will need to factor in the tax implications of the expansion. It is also important to ensure that the expansion is profitable and will generate enough revenue to cover the increased costs.
To know more about total capital amount, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28499903#
#SPJ11
Trower Corp. has a debt-equity ratio of.85. The company is considering a new plant that will cost $114 million to build. When the company issues new equity, it incurs a flotation cost of 8.4 percent. The flotation cost on new debt is 3.9 percent. What is the initial cost of the plant if the company raises all equity externally? (Enter your answer in dollars, not millions of dollars, e.g., 1,234,567. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to the nearest whole number, e.g., 32.) Initial cash flow $ 121,707,014 What is the initial cost of the plant if the company typically uses 65 percent retained earnings? (Enter your answer in dollars, not millions of dollars, e.g., 1,234,567. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to the nearest whole number, e.g., 32.) Initial cash flow $ 117,989,314 What is the initi cost of the plant if the company typically uses 100 percent retained earnings? (Enter your answer in dollars, not millions of dollars, e.g., 1,234,567. Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to the nearest whole number, e.g., 32.) Initial cash flow $ 116,080,029
The initial cost of the plant if the company raises all equity externally is $121,707,014.
The initial cost of the plant if the company typically uses 65 percent retained earnings is $117,989,314.
The initial cost of the plant if the company typically uses 100 percent retained earnings is $116,080,029.
To calculate the initial cost of the plant if the company raises all equity externally, we can use the formula:
Initial cost = [tex]\frac{\text{Cost of new plant}}{1 - \text{Flotation cost on new equity}}[/tex]
Cost of new plant = $114 million
Flotation cost on new equity = 8.4% = 0.084
Therefore, Initial cost = [tex]$\frac{114\text{ million}}{1-0.084}$[/tex]
Initial cost = $121,707,014
To calculate the initial cost of the plant if the company typically uses 65 percent retained earnings, we need to calculate the proportion of equity and debt used to finance the plant. Assuming the remaining 35% of the cost is financed with debt, we can use the debt-equity ratio to calculate the proportion of debt and equity:
Debt proportion =[tex]\frac{\text{Debt}}{\text{Debt} + \text{Equity}}[/tex] = 0.85
Equity proportion = 1 - Debt proportion = 0.15
We also need to adjust for the flotation costs of issuing new equity and debt:
Equity cost = [tex]\frac{\text{Cost of new equity}}{1 - \text{Flotation cost on new equity}}[/tex]
Equity cost = $114 million x [tex]\frac{0.15}{1-0.084}[/tex]
Equity cost = $22,919,620
Debt cost = [tex]\frac{\text{Cost of new debt}}{(1 - \text{Flotation cost on new debt})}[/tex]
Debt cost = $114 million x [tex]\frac{0.35}{1 - 0.039}[/tex]
Debt cost = $46,201,694
Therefore, the initial cost of the plant is:
Initial cost = Cost of new plant + Equity cost + Debt cost
Initial cost = $114 million + $22,919,620 + $46,201,694
Initial cost = $117,989,314
To calculate the initial cost of the plant if the company typically uses 100 percent retained earnings, we can simply use the cost of the new plant and adjust for the flotation cost of issuing new equity:
Initial cost = [tex]\frac{\text{Cost of new plant}}{1-\text{Flotation cost on new equity}}[/tex]
Initial cost = [tex]$\dfrac{114 \text{ million}}{1-0.084}$[/tex]
Initial cost = $116,080,029.
Learn more about initial cost: https://brainly.com/question/14984116
#SPJ11
The auditors' information source for validating the bank reconciliation items is typically a ______, which is a complete bank statement including all paid checks and deposit slips. The client requests the bank to send this bank statement directly to the auditor. It is usually for a 10- to 20-day period following the date of the financial statements.
The auditors' information source for validating the bank reconciliation items is typically a complete bank statement, which includes all paid checks and deposit slips. The bank statement serves as the foundation for the bank reconciliation process.
The auditors use the bank statement to compare the transactions listed in the client's records to the transactions that have been processed by the bank. This comparison helps the auditors identify any discrepancies and determine whether the bank balance in the client's records matches the bank's actual balance.
To ensure the accuracy of the bank statement, the client requests the bank to send it directly to the auditor. This minimizes the risk of the client altering the bank statement or withholding information that may impact the reconciliation process.
The bank statement typically covers a 10- to 20-day period following the date of the financial statements. This ensures that the bank statement includes all transactions that have been processed by the bank up to the date of the financial statements.
The deposit slips are important reconciliation items that the auditors use to verify the accuracy of the bank's deposit transactions. The deposit slips provide details on the amount, date, and source of the deposits made by the client.
The auditors compare the information on the deposit slips to the client's records to ensure that all deposits have been recorded accurately. If there are any discrepancies between the deposit slips and the client's records, the auditors may need to perform additional procedures to determine the cause of the discrepancy.
Overall, the bank statement and deposit slips are crucial sources of information for the auditors when validating the reconciliation items. These items help the auditors determine the accuracy of the client's bank balances and identify any potential errors or irregularities that may impact the financial statements.
A comprehensive bank statement, which contains bank Reconciliation copies of all paid checks and deposit slips, is normally the auditors' information source for verifying the bank reconciliation items.
The basis for the bank reconciliation procedure is the bank statement..The bank statement is used by the auditors to compare the transactions reported in the client's records to the transactions that the bank has actually processed.
The auditors can see any differences and assess whether the bank balance listed in the client's records corresponds to the real balance of the bank using this comparison. The client asks the bank to provide the bank statement directly to the auditor in order to guarantee its accuracy. By doing this, the chance that the customer may alter the bank statement or omit information that could affect the reconciliation process is reduced. The auditors utilise the deposit slips as significant reconciliation materials to check the accuracy of the bank's deposit activities.
To know more about Bank Reconciliation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31534033
#SPJ4
Consider a circle whose equation is x2 + y2 – 2x – 8 = 0. Which statements are true? Select three options. The radius of the circle is 3 units. The center of the circle lies on the x-axis. The center of the circle lies on the y-axis. The standard form of the equation is (x – 1)² + y² = 3. The radius of this circle is the same as the radius of the circle whose equation is x² + y² = 9.
According to the question of equation, the first statement is true. The second statement is false. The third statement is false. The fourth statement is true. The fifth statement is false.
What is equation?Equation is a mathematical statement that expresses the equality of two expressions by using symbols. It typically consists of an equal sign and two expressions or terms that are linked by the equal sign. These expressions or terms can contain numbers, variables, constants, and mathematical operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Equations are used to describe physical phenomena and solve problems.
The radius of the circle is 3 units because the equation can be rearranged to (x – 1)² + y² = 3, which is the standard form of a circle. The center of the circle lies at the point (1, 0) and does not lie on the x-axis. The center of the circle lies at the point (1, 0) and does not lie on the y-axis. The standard form of the equation is (x – 1)² + y² = 3. The radius of this circle is 3 units, while the radius of the circle whose equation is x² + y² = 9 is 3√2 units, which is not the same as 3.
To learn more about equation
https://brainly.com/question/28246336
#SPJ1
T/F the company's bank reconciliation is a critical means by which an auditor completes audit procedures over the cash balance in the financial statements.
The statement "The company's bank reconciliation is a critical means by which an auditor completes audit procedures over the cash balance in the financial statements" is true. Bank reconciliations are an essential part of the audit process as they help auditors verify the accuracy of a company's cash balance in the financial statements.
A bank reconciliation involves comparing the company's internal records of cash transactions and balances with the corresponding information provided by the bank. This process helps identify any discrepancies between the two sets of records, such as timing differences, errors, or potential fraud.
1. Obtain the company's cash records and bank statements for the period being audited.
2. Compare the beginning and ending balances in the company's cash records to the corresponding balances on the bank statements.
3. Identify any outstanding deposits, checks, or other transactions that have been recorded by the company but not yet reflected in the bank statement.
4. Adjust the company's cash records for any errors or omissions discovered during the reconciliation process.
5. Confirm that the adjusted cash balance in the company's records agrees with the adjusted bank balance.
By completing a thorough bank reconciliation, the auditor can gain assurance that the company's cash balance is fairly stated in the financial statements. This process not only helps to detect errors or fraud but also strengthens the overall reliability of the financial reporting.
To know more about bank reconciliation, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29097188#
#SPJ11
some economists argue that regional free trade agreements will provide global benefits only if
Some economists argue that regional free trade agreements will provide global benefits only if trade creation exceeds trade diversion.
Free trade agreements (FTAs) are agreements reached between two or more countries on a range of topics, such as investor protections, intellectual property rights, and responsibilities influencing trade in goods and services. It could require keeping more records to be able to receive FTA benefits for your product, but it could provide it a competitive edge against products from other countries.
Each FTA has unique features, but they all generally have the same goal of lowering trade barriers and promoting more secure and open business and investment environments. Free trade agreements (FTAs) make it possible for American exporters and manufacturers to gain greater access to other markets. Tariffs are decreased or eliminated, trade barriers are removed through bilateral and global agreements, and economic growth is promoted.
Learn more about Trade Barriers here:
https://brainly.com/question/1326741
#SPJ4
The general ledger of MPX, Inc., provides the following information relating to purchases of merchandise:
End of Year Beginning of Year
Inventory $820,000 $780,000
Accounts payable to merchandise suppliers 430,000 500,000
The company's cost of goods sold during the year was $2,975,000. Compute the amount of cash payments made during the year to suppliers merchandise.
The amount of cash payments made during the year to suppliers of merchandise for MPX, Inc. is $3,085,000.Cash payments are made to the provider of services or products by the recipient in the form of banknotes or coins.
It may also entail paying employees within a company for the hours they worked or compensating them for tiny expenses that are too little to be processed through the accounts receivable system.
To compute the cash payments, we need to use the following formula:
Cash Payments = Beginning Accounts Payable + Purchases - Ending Accounts Payable
First, we need to find the Purchases value using the following formula:
Purchases = Cost of Goods Sold + Ending Inventory - Beginning Inventory
Now, plug in the given values:
Purchases = $2,975,000 (Cost of Goods Sold) + $820,000 (Ending Inventory) - $780,000 (Beginning Inventory)
Purchases = $3,015,000
Now, plug in the values into the Cash Payments formula:
Cash Payments = $500,000 (Beginning Accounts Payable) + $3,015,000 (Purchases) - $430,000 (Ending Accounts Payable)
Cash Payments = $3,085,000
To know more about cash payments visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30877567
#SPJ11
The current price of stock in Company XYZ is $45 and no ex-dividend dates are to occur for the next three months. The risk-free rate is 4.00% per year. The standard deviation for the period in question is 0.4. You are a financial advisor and one of your best clients is Mr. John Smith who is a senior-level manager at a Fortune 500 company. A portion of Mr. Smith’s incentive compensation is paid in restricted stock in the company he works for which he cannot sell for a period of three years from the date of the award of the shares. Smith has been employed at the company for 35 years and he has been in a senior position for the last 20 years. Mr. Smith has a concentrated equity position in the company owning 1,000,000 shares. More than 80% of his wealth is in the company stock. Assume that due to contractual obligations, he cannot sell his stock over the next three months. Due to his concentrated position, he wants to hedge against the price of XYZ stock falling more than 20%. He can do this by buying put options with a strike price of $36.
1. Assume that Mr. Smith does not have the necessary amount of liquid assets (other than his stock which he cannot sell) to be able to purchase these put options so he will have to enter into an equity collar. At what strike price should he strike the corresponding call options?
2. If Mr. Smith decides that he can raise enough cash to put up $200,000 to pay for some of the puts, how will it affect the strike price on the call?
3. If instead of three months, the restriction on his stock is six months, how will this change the hedge? Solve for the appropriate put and call strikes.
4. Using your answers from a) above, assume that after one month, the stock price goes up to $70 and Mr. Smith wants to unwind his hedge. Describe how you would go about terminating this hedge. Determine what it would cost to terminate this hedge.
5. Again, using your answers from a) above, if after one month the stock price went down to $28 instead and Mr. Smith wanted to terminate this hedge, what would be the economic repercussions? Calculate this amount.
6. As Mr. Smith’s financial advisor, would you recommend this strategy to Mr. Smith? Why or why not?
7. List down the benefits and advantages of this strategy.
Okay, here are the solutions to the questions:
1. Since Mr. Smith cannot sell his stock for 3 months and wants to hedge against a drop of more than 20%, a put option with a strike price of $36 would be appropriate. To collar this with call options, we would want the call strike to be $54 ( $45 current price + 20% hedge).
So put strike = $36 and call strike = $54.
2. If Mr. Smith can put up $200,000 for the puts, he can buy more put options which will allow a lower put strike, e.g. $32.
So now put strike = $32 and call strike = $51.
3. If the restriction is for 6 months instead of 3 months, a longer dated put and call would be needed.
For a 6 month hedge, put strike could be $30 and call strike $50.
4. If the stock price goes up to $70 after a month, Mr. Smith can:
- Buy back the put options at a lower price since the strike is now out of the money. This will cost less than the original purchase price.
- Sell the call options which are now in the money. This can generate a profit.
The total cost to terminate the hedge would be the amount spent buying back the puts plus any loss from selling the calls in the money.
5. If the stock price drops to $28, Mr. Smith would:
- Lose the $200,000 put premium since the puts are now deep in the money.
- Potentially have to exercise the puts and sell the stock at $28, taking a $17 per share loss.
- Lose the value of the call options which would expire worthless.
The economic loss could be substantial in this scenario.
6. I would recommend this strategy to Mr. Smith with some cautions:
Pros: Provides downside protection for a concentrated position. Allows Mr. Smith to keep the stock long-term.
Cautions: The strategy is complex and expensive. There are opportunities for losses as shown above. Mr. Smith needs to monitor the position closely. The hedge may not provide full downside protection.
Overall, for a large concentrated position, a hedge could provide some comfort but needs to be done carefully with full understanding of the risks and costs. Close monitoring is required.
The benefits of the strategy are downside protection and the ability to keep a large long-term stake in the company. But there are also risks of losses and the costs of implementing and unwinding the hedge. Proper evaluation of these pros and cons is necessary before employing this strategy.
food for less (ffl), a grocery store, is considering offering one hour photo developing in their store. the firm expects that sales from the new one hour machine will be $150,000 per year. ffl currently offers overnight film processing with annual sales of $100,000. while many of the one hour photo sales will be to new customers, ffl estimates that 60% of their current overnight photo customers will switch and use the one hour service. suppose that of the 60% of ffl's current overnight photo customers, half would start taking their film to a competitor that offers one hour photo processing if ffl fails to offer the one hour service. the level of incremental sales in this case is closest to:
The level of incremental sales in this case is $75,000. This is because the $150,000 in new sales from the one hour photo developing service is partially offset by the estimated loss of $25,000 in overnight photo processing sales (40% of $100,000).
Additionally, half of the 60% of current overnight photo customers who would switch to a competitor if FFL does not offer the one hour service represents a loss of $50,000 in sales. Therefore, the net incremental sales would be $75,000 ($150,000 - $25,000 - $50,000).
It is important for FFL to consider the potential impact on its current customers before implementing a new service. In this case, FFL expects that 60% of its current overnight photo customers will switch to the new one hour service.
However, if FFL fails to offer the one hour service, half of those customers may go to a competitor who offers the service. This highlights the importance of staying competitive in the industry and meeting the changing demands and expectations of customers.
Offering new services can be a great way for businesses to increase their revenue, but it is important to carefully evaluate the potential impact on existing customers and competitors. By doing so, businesses can make informed decisions that maximize their profitability and maintain customer satisfaction.
To know more about grocery store refer home
https://brainly.com/question/29352339#
#SPJ11
The Meldrum Co. expects to sell 3,000 units, ± 15 percent, of a new product. The variable cost per unit is $8, ± 5 percent, and the annual fixed costs are $12,500, ± 5 percent. The annual depreciation expense is $4,000 and the sale price is $18 a unit, ± 2 percent. The project requires $24,000 of fixed assets which will be worthless when the project ends in six years. Also required is $6,500 of net working capital for the life of the project. The tax rate is 21 percent and the required rate of return is 12 percent. What is the net present value of the pessimistic scenario?
A. $13,810.29
B. $14,008.16
C. $12,979.40
D. $8,308.15
E. $10,146.18
The net present value of the pessimistic scenario is -$22,191.85. The answer is not one of the choices given.
To calculate the net present value (NPV) of the pessimistic scenario, we need to follow these steps:
1: Calculate the pessimistic values of the variables.
Sales volume: 3,000 - 15% = 2,550 units
Variable cost per unit: $8 + 5% = $8.40
Fixed costs: $12,500 - 5% = $11,875
Sale price: $18 - 2% = $17.64
2: Calculate the annual cash flows.
Revenue = Sales volume x Sale price
= 2,550 x $17.64
= $45,074.40
Variable costs = Sales volume x Variable cost per unit
= 2,550 x $8.40
= $21,420
Contribution margin = Revenue - Variable costs
= $45,074.40 - $21,420
= $23,654.40
Fixed costs = Annual fixed costs + Depreciation expense
= $11,875 + $4,000
= $15,875
Operating income before taxes = Contribution margin - Fixed costs
= $23,654.40 - $15,875
= $7,779.40
Taxes = Operating income before taxes x Tax rate
= $7,779.40 x 21%
= $1,633.27
Net income = Operating income before taxes - Taxes
= $7,779.40 - $1,633.27
= $6,146.13
Annual cash flow = Net income + Depreciation expense
= $6,146.13 + $4,000
= $10,146.13
3: Calculate the present value of each annual cash flow.
where PV is the present value, CF is the cash flow, r is the required rate of return, and n is the number of years.
Year 0:
Initial investment = Fixed assets + Net working capital
= $24,000 + $6,500
= $30,500
PV0 = -$30,500 (negative because it's a cash outflow)
Year 1-6:
= $8,308.15
4: Calculate the net present value.
NPV = PV0 + PV1-6
= -$30,500 + $8,308.15
= -$22,191.85
For more such questions on present value, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/20813161
#SPJ11
Use two methods including formula and various Excel functions to solve the following problem:
Calculate the duration for a $1000, 4-year bond with a 6% annual coupon, currently selling at par. Use the duration to estimate the percentage change in the bond’s price for a decrease in the market interest rate to 4%. Use the bond price volatility equation to compute the bond price volatility. Compare the result with the estimated percentage change in the bond price.
Bond Price Volatility is $73.51.
Duration can be calculated using the following formula:
Duration = (PV of Cash Flows × Time) / Bond Price
where,
PV of Cash Flows = Present Value of all Cash Flows
Time = Time to receipt of Cash Flows in years
The cash flows for this bond would be:
Year 1: $60 coupon
Year 2: $60 coupon
Year 3: $60 coupon
Year 4: $1060 (coupon plus principal)
The present value of these cash flows can be calculated using the present value formula:
[tex]PV = CF / (1+r)^n[/tex]
where,
CF = Cash Flow
r = discount rate
n = time to receipt of cash flow
For this bond, assuming a discount rate of 6%, the present value of cash flows would be:
[tex]PV of Year 1 coupon = $60 / (1+0.06)^1 = $56.60\\PV of Year 2 coupon = $60 / (1+0.06)^2 = $53.50\\PV of Year 3 coupon = $60 / (1+0.06)^3 = $50.47\\PV of Year 4 coupon and principal = $1060 / (1+0.06)^4 = $820.11[/tex]
Therefore, the PV of Cash Flows = $980.68
The Time to receipt of Cash Flows = 1, 2, 3, and 4 years
Using the formula above, we can calculate the duration:
Duration = ($980.68 × 1 + $980.68 × 2 + $980.68 × 3 + $980.68 × 4) / $1000
Duration = 3.827 years
To estimate the percentage change in the bond’s price for a decrease in the market interest rate to 4%, we can use the following formula:
% Change in Bond Price = - Duration × Change in Yield
where,
Change in Yield = New Yield - Old Yield
In this case, the change in yield would be 6% - 4% = 2%.
% Change in Bond Price = - 3.827 × 2% = -7.654%
Therefore, the estimated percentage change in the bond price would be a decrease of 7.654%.
To compute the bond price volatility using the bond price volatility equation, we can use the following formula:
Bond Price Volatility = Duration × Bond Price × (Change in Yield / (1 + Yield))
In this case, assuming a yield of 6%, the bond price volatility would be:
Bond Price Volatility = 3.827 × $1000 × (2% / (1 + 6%)) = $73.51
To know more about bond refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/29667007
#SPJ11
McMillin Industries is currently 100% equity financed, has 25,000 shares outstanding at a price of $30 a share, and produces an annual EBIT of $150,000. The firm is considering issuing $300,000 of debt and repurchasing shares. The cost of debt is 12%. Ignore taxes. By how much will EPS change if the company issues the debt and EBIT remains constant?
A) $.72 B) $.76 C) $1.72 D) $1.60 E) $1.54
To calculate the change in EPS, we need to find the earnings available to shareholders after the proposed debt issue and share repurchase. EPS will decrease by $0.72, Correct answer is option A
Before the debt issue, the company has 25,000 shares outstanding and produces an annual EBIT of $150,000, which means earnings per share (EPS) are: EPS = Earnings / Shares = $150,000 / 25,000 = $6.00
If the company issues $300,000 of debt, the interest expense would be $36,000 ($300,000 x 12%), leaving EBIT of $114,000 ($150,000 - $36,000). The company then repurchases shares with the proceeds of the debt issue, reducing the number of outstanding shares.
Let's assume the company repurchases 10,000 shares at the current market price of $30 per share, leaving 15,000 shares outstanding.The earnings available to shareholders after the debt issue and share repurchase would be:
Earnings = EBIT - Interest expense = $114,000 - $36,000 = $78,000 EPS = Earnings / Shares = $78,000 / 15,000 = $5.28. Therefore, the change in EPS is: Change in EPS = New EPS - Old EPS = $5.28 - $6.00 = -$0.72
So the answer is not among the options provided. The EPS will decrease by $0.72 if the company issues the debt and EBIT remains constant. Correct answer is option A
Know more about debt here:
https://brainly.com/question/31102427
#SPJ11
blake is a manager at a sporting goods store and needs to fill an open position for an assistant manager. austin works in the store as a sales associate and blake thinks he would be perfect for the job. why might blake be hesitant about promoting austin and giving him the job?
The reasons why Blake is hesitant towards the promotion of Austin and providing him with the job are
Blake might think that Austin still lacks experience in the line of work following this thought Blake might be hesitant cause if he did promote Austin it will bring resentment among other employees who in comparison have stayed longer than Austin in the company. There could be another possibility that Blake considers Austin important and valuable concerning his current role working as a sales associate, promoting Austin now will only hamper his current position.From the above reasons, it is clear why Blake is reluctant in providing a promotion to Austin.
To learn more about promotion,
https://brainly.com/question/11131986
#SPJ4
do you believe the cost of equity you calculated is a reasonable measure of the risk in your high income country?
Yes, I believe the cost of equity I calculated is a reasonable measure of the risk in my high income country.
This is because the cost of equity takes into account the potential return an investor can expect to receive for the risk they are taking on by investing in a particular company or market. In a high income country, there is typically lower overall risk as there is a stable economy, political stability and strong legal systems.
Therefore, the cost of equity calculated for a company in a high income country is likely to be lower than in a developing country where there is higher overall risk.
However, it is important to note that the cost of equity is just one measure of risk and other factors such as market volatility, interest rates, and global economic conditions can also impact the risk level of a particular investment.
To know more about interest rates click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13324776#
#SPJ11
If the demand for real money balances does not depend on the interest rate, then the LM curve: is a. vertical. b. slopes up to the right c. slopes down to the right d. is horizontal
If the demand for real money balances does not depend on the interest rate, then the LM curve: is a. vertical.
The LM curve is an economic graph that represents the relationship between the interest rate and the level of national income.
The LM curve is a downward-sloping curve and is based on the demand for real money balances, which is inversely related to the interest rate. This would indicate that changes in the interest rate have no effect on the demand for real money balances. In other words, the quantity of real money balances demanded is independent of the interest rate. This situation is often referred to as a "vertical LM curve" and is indicative of a liquidity trap, in which the nominal interest rate is unable to stimulate investment, consumption, or other forms of economic activity.
Know more about Demand here
https://brainly.com/question/29703449#
#SPJ11
The demand for real money balances does not depend on the interest rate, then the LM curve is d. is horizontal.
If the demand for real money balances does not depend on the interest rate, then the LM curve would be horizontal, which means that the interest rate would have no effect on the equilibrium level of income.
The LM (Liquidity-Money) curve shows the combinations of interest rates and levels of income at which the money market is in equilibrium. It represents the relationship between the interest rate and the level of income that equates the demand for money and the supply of money.
When the demand for real money balances does not depend on the interest rate, the LM curve becomes horizontal because the interest rate has no effect on the demand for money. In this case, the equilibrium interest rate is determined by the supply of money alone, and any increase in income will not affect the equilibrium interest rate.
Learn more about horizontal here:
https://brainly.com/question/29019854
#SPJ11
steve's tentative minimum tax (tmt) for 2022 is $244,200. note: leave no answer blank. enter zero if applicable. required: what is his amt if his regular tax is $227,700? what is his amt if his regular tax is $265,500?
if Steve's regular tax for 2022 is $265,500, and his TMT is $244,200, he will owe the IRS $265,500, since this is the higher of the two amounts. In this scenario, Steve's regular tax exceeds his TMT, so he will only pay the regular tax amount.
Steve's tentative minimum tax (TMT) is a minimum tax that ensures that individuals who have significant deductions or use tax shelters still pay a minimum amount of tax. The TMT is calculated separately from the regular tax, and the higher of the two amounts is the amount owed to the IRS.
If Steve's regular tax for 2022 is $227,700, and his TMT is $244,200, he will owe the IRS $244,200, since this is the higher of the two amounts. The regular tax is calculated based on taxable income and applicable tax rates, while the TMT is calculated based on a set of alternative tax rules that limit certain deductions and credits.
It's important to note that the TMT is a complex tax calculation and can vary depending on an individual's circumstances. It's also subject to change each year based on inflation adjustments and changes to the tax code. Taxpayers who believe they may be subject to the TMT should consult with a tax professional to ensure they are properly calculating their tax liability.
To learn more about tentative minimum tax
https://brainly.com/question/15056544
#SPJ4
i think it would be good to understand what rate of return would result in an npv of what is jennifer referring to?
Jennifer is likely referring to the net present value (NPV) of a project or investment. The NPV is a calculation that takes into account the present value of expected future cash flows and compares it to the initial investment.
The goal is to determine if the project is financially viable and if it will generate a positive return on investment. To determine what rate of return would result in a specific NPV, you would need to use a financial calculator or spreadsheet software to run different scenarios.
You would input the initial investment, expected cash flows, and discount rate (the rate of return required to make the investment worthwhile) to determine the NPV. Then you could adjust the discount rate until you reach the desired NPV.
It's important to note that the discount rate used in the NPV calculation should reflect the risk associated with the project or investment. Higher-risk projects or investments would require a higher discount rate to compensate for the uncertainty.
You can learn more about net present value at: brainly.com/question/29669538
#SPJ11
cameroon corporation manufactures and sells electric staplers for $16.90 each. if 10,000 units were sold in december, and management forecasts 4.9% growth in sales each month, the number of units of electric stapler sales budgeted for march should be:
The number of units of electric stapler sales budgeted for March is 11,501 units.
Cameroon Corporation sold 10,000 electric staplers in December at a price of $16.90 each. The company's management has forecasted a growth rate of 4.9% in sales each month. Using this forecast, we can calculate the number of electric staplers sold for January, February, and March.
In January, the sales would be 10,000 x 1.049 = 10,490 units.
In February, the sales would be 10,490 x 1.049 = 10,988 units.
In March, the sales would be 10,988 x 1.049 = 11,501 units.
Therefore, the number of units of electric stapler sales budgeted for March is 11,501 units. Sales forecasting is a critical component of budgeting and planning, and using historical trends to forecast sales growth can help companies make informed decisions about future sales projections.
Learn more about electric stapler
https://brainly.com/question/8676329
#SPJ4