The test statistic of z=-2.12 is obtained when testing the claim that p<0.57. a. Using a significance level of a=0.05, find the critical value(s). b. Should we reject H, or should we fail to reject H?

Using the digits 0-9, the puzzle becomes:

To solve this puzzle, use the factoring pattern (a-b)(a+b) = a² - b² for the second equation.

First, the first blank in equation 1 must be either 1 or 3, since the two factors must have a difference of 1. Therefore, the first blank in equation 1 must be 1, and the second blank must be 2.

Next, use the factoring pattern in equation 2 to get:

x² - 1x + 1 = (x - 2)(x - 1)

This means that the missing number in the second set of blanks is 1, since the two factors have a difference of 1.

In equation 3, the second blank must be -3, since the two factors must have a difference of 5. Therefore, the first blank must be -1.

Finally, in equation 4, the missing number in the second set of blanks must be -4, since the two factors must have a difference of 2. Therefore, the missing number in the first set of blanks is 18.

Find out more on factorization here: https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ1

To evaluate the triple integral of 8xyz dv over the tetrahedron T with vertices (0, 0, 0), (1, 0, 0), (1, 1, 0), and (1, 0, 1), we need to set up the proper bounds for the integral. We can set up the integral as follows:

∫∫∫_T 8xyz dz dy dx

First, find the equations of the planes that form the tetrahedron. The planes are:
1. x = 1 (constant plane)
2. z = 0 (xy-plane)
3. y = 1 - x (line in the xy-plane)
4. z = 1 - x (line in the xz-plane)

Now, set the bounds for the integral:

x: 0 to 1
y: 0 to 1 - x
z: 0 to 1 - x

So, the triple integral becomes:

∫(0 to 1) ∫(0 to 1-x) ∫(0 to 1-x) 8xyz dz dy dx

Evaluate the innermost integral:

∫(0 to 1) ∫(0 to 1-x) [4xyz(1-x)] dy dx

Now evaluate the second integral:

∫(0 to 1) [8x/3 * (1-x)^3] dx

Finally, evaluate the outermost integral:

[2/15 * (1-x)^5] evaluated from 0 to 1

Plugging in x = 1 gives 0, and plugging in x = 0 gives 2/15.

Therefore, the value of the triple integral is 2/15.

To know more about triple integral : brainly.com/question/31385814

#SPJ11

a) 15.7

b) 0.07970

c) Having 0 births in a single day would be a significantly low number of births, as the probability is essentially 0.

We have,

a.

To find the mean number of births per day, you need to divide the total number of births (5742) by the number of days in a year (365).
Mean number of births per day = 5742 / 365 = 15.7 births per day (rounded to one decimal place).

b.

To find the probability of having 18 births in a single day, you can use the Poisson probability formula:
P(X = k) = (e^{-λ} x λ^k) / k!
Where λ (lambda) is the mean number of births per day (15.7), k is the number of births we're looking for (18), and e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.718).

P(X = 18) = (e^(-15.7) x 15.7^18) / 18!
P(X = 18) = (2.718^(-15.7) x 15.7^18) / 18!
P(X = 18) = 0.07970 (rounded to five decimal places)

c.

To find the probability of having no births in a single day, use the same Poisson probability formula with k = 0:
P(X=0) = (e^(-15.7) * 15.7^0) / 0!
P(X=0) = (2.718^(-15.7) * 1) / 1
P(X=0) = 0 (rounded to four decimal places)

Having 0 births in a single day would be a significantly low number of births, as the probability is essentially 0.

Thus,

a) 15.7

b) 0.07970

c) Having 0 births in a single day would be a significantly low number of births, as the probability is essentially 0.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

To find P(A | B),  first we use the formula P(A | B) = P(A ∩ B) / P(B).To find P(B | A), we use the formula P(B | A) = P(A ∩ B) / P(A).  To determine if A and B are independent, we need to compare P(A ∩ B) with P(A)P(B). If P(A ∩ B) = P(A)P(B), then A and B are independent. If P(A ∩ B) ≠ P(A)P(B), then A and B are dependent.

a. Plugging in the given values, we have:
P(A | B) = 0.20 / 0.50 = 0.40
So, P(A | B) = 0.4000 (to 4 decimals).

b. Plugging in the given values, we have:
P(B | A) = 0.20 / 0.50 = 0.40
So, P(B | A) = 0.4000 (to 4 decimals).

c. Given values are:
P(A) = 0.50
P(B) = 0.50
P(A ∩ B) = 0.20
Calculating P(A) * P(B):
0.50 * 0.50 = 0.25

Since P(A ∩ B) ≠ P(A) * P(B), events A and B are not independent. The occurrence of one event affects the probability of the other event occurring.

To learn more about probability : brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:

BC = 30

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that opposite sides of a parallelogram are congruent. Because of this, we can equate their lengths and solve for the variable z:

15z = 19z - 8

↓ adding 8 to both sides

15z + 8 = 19z

↓ subtracting 15z from both sides

8 = 4z

↓ dividing both sides by 4

2 = z

z = 2

Now, we can plug this z-value into the length of side BC and simplify:

BC = 19z - 8

BC = 19(2) - 8

BC = 30

If there are 48 tulips, the number of daisies present would be 56.

If there are 6 tulips for every 7 daisies, we can express the ratio of tulips to daisies as 6/7.

Let's use the information that there are 48 tulips to find out how many daisies there are:

If 6 tulips correspond to 7 daisies, then we can set up the proportion:

6/7 = 48/x

where x is the number of daisies.

To solve for x:

Therefore, there are 56 daisies in the flower garden.

More on simple proportions can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/29912751

#SPJ1

The flower garden contains 56 daisies.

Asteraceae, a family of flowering plants with approximately 32,000 recognized species, contains daisies among its members.

In the floral garden, if there are 6 tulips for every 7 daisies, we may apply a ratio to determine how many daisies there are:

6 tulips / 7 daisies = 48 tulips / x daisies

Cross-multiplying, we get:

6 tulips * x daisies = 48 tulips * 7 daisies

To put it simply, we have:

6x = 336

x = 56 is obtained by multiplying both sides by 6.

Therefore, the flower garden contains 56 daisies.

Learn more about ratio here : brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ1

The entire surface area must be at least 18.21 square units.

A function connects an input with an output. It is analogous to a machine with an input and an output. And the output is somehow related to the input. The standard manner of writing a function is f(x) "f(x) =... "

Let's start by finding the first derivative of the function A with respect to r:

A(r) = 2πr³ - 6πr² + 71.1r - 10.8

A'(r) = 6πr² - 12πr + 71.1

To find the stationary points of A, we need to solve the equation A'(r) = 0:

6πr² - 12πr + 71.1 = 0

Dividing both sides by 6π, we get:

r² - 2r + 11.85/π = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we can solve for r:

r = [2 ± √(2² - 4(1)(11.85/π))] / 2

r = 1 ± √(1 - 11.85/π)

Since the value under the square root is negative, there are no real solutions to this equation. Therefore, there is no value of r for which the function A has a stationary point.

Next, let's verify that the value of r = 2.1 results in the total surface area being minimized. To do this, we need to find the second derivative of A:

A''(r) = 12πr - 12π

Setting this equal to zero and solving for r, we get:

12πr - 12π = 0

r = 1

Since A''(1) > 0, we know that r = 1 corresponds to a minimum value of A. Therefore, the value of r = 2.1, which is greater than 1, also corresponds to a minimum value of A.

To find the minimum total surface area, we can substitute r = 2.1 into the expression for A:

A(2.1) = 2π(2.1)³ - 6π(2.1)² + 71.1(2.1) - 10.8

A(2.1) ≈ 18.21

Therefore, the minimum total surface area is approximately 18.21 square units.

Learn more about function on:

https://brainly.com/question/10439235

#SPJ11

Part A: -6 and -1

Part B: (x - 6)(x - 1) = 0

Part C: x = 6 and x = 1

    We need to find two numbers that add up -7 and multiply to 6.

    We know that 6 * 1 = 6, but 6 + 1 is not -7. However, -6 * -1 = 6 and -6 + -1 = -7. Our factors are -6 and -1.

    Next, we will rewrite this in factored form. Using the factors above, the form is as follows.

(x - 6)(x - 1) = 0

    Lastly, we will use the zero product property to solve. This states that if xy = 0, then x = 0 and y = 0 because anything times zero is equal to zero.

x - 6 = 0       x - 1 = 0

x = 6             x = 1

Answer:

Its the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

correct answer

The area between -2 and 0 is 0.5000 - 0.0228 = 0.4772. Therefore, P(-2 < z ≤ 0) = 0.4772.

(a) To find P(z ≤ -3.0), we can use a standard normal distribution table or technology such as a calculator or statistical software. Looking at a standard normal distribution table, we find that the area to the left of -3.0 is 0.0013 (rounded to four decimal places). Therefore, P(z ≤ -3.0) = 0.0013.

(b) To find P(z ≥ -3), we can use the fact that the standard normal distribution is symmetric about its mean of 0. Therefore, P(z ≥ -3) is the same as the area to the right of 3, which we can find using a standard normal distribution table or technology. Looking at a table, we find that the area to the right of 3 is also 0.0013. Therefore, P(z ≥ -3) = 0.0013.

(c) To find P(z ≥ -1.7), we can use a standard normal distribution table or technology. Looking at a table, we find that the area to the left of -1.7 is 0.0446 (rounded to four decimal places). Therefore, the area to the right of -1.7 (which is the same as P(z ≥ -1.7)) is 1 - 0.0446 = 0.9554. Therefore, P(z ≥ -1.7) = 0.9554.

(d) To find P(-2.6 ≤ z), we can use a standard normal distribution table or technology. Looking at a table, we find that the area to the left of -2.6 is 0.0047 (rounded to four decimal places). Therefore, P(-2.6 ≤ z) is the same as the area to the right of -2.6, which is 1 - 0.0047 = 0.9953. Therefore, P(-2.6 ≤ z) = 0.9953.

(e) To find P(-2 < z ≤ 0), we can use the fact that the standard normal distribution is symmetric about its mean of 0. Therefore, we can find the area to the left of -2 and the area to the left of 0 and subtract them to find the area between -2 and 0. Looking at a standard normal distribution table, we find that the area to the left of -2 is 0.0228 (rounded to four decimal places), and the area to the left of 0 is 0.5000. Therefore, the area between -2 and 0 is 0.5000 - 0.0228 = 0.4772. Therefore, P(-2 < z ≤ 0) = 0.4772.

To learn more about distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29664127

#SPJ11

Answer:

To solve this problem, we can use the following formula:

Volume of a pyramid = (1/3) * base area * height

The first step is to calculate the height of the pyramid. Since each side wall makes an angle of 45° with the plane of the base, the height is equal to the length of the altitude of the rhombus. The altitude can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem:

altitude = sqrt((diagonal/2)^2 - (side/2)^2)

= sqrt((5.4/2)^2 - (4.5/2)^2)

= 2.7 cm

The base area of the pyramid is equal to the area of the rhombus:

base area = (diagonal1 * diagonal2) / 2

= (4.5 * 4.5) / 2

= 10.125 cm^2

Now, we can calculate the volume of the pyramid:

Volume = (1/3) * base area * height

= (1/3) * 10.125 * 2.7

= 9.1125 cm^3

Therefore, the volume of the pyramid is 9.1125 cm^3.

To calculate the area of the pyramid, we need to find the area of each triangular face. Since the pyramid has four triangular faces, we can calculate the total area by multiplying the area of one face by 4. The area of one face can be calculated using the following formula:

area of a triangle = (1/2) * base * height

where base is equal to the length of one side of the rhombus, and height is equal to the height of the pyramid. Since the rhombus is a regular rhombus, all sides have the same length, which is equal to 4.5 cm. Thus, we have:

area of a triangle = (1/2) * 4.5 * 2.7

= 6.075 cm^2

Therefore, the total area of the pyramid is:

area = 4 * area of a triangle

= 4 * 6.075

= 24.3 cm^2

Hence, the area of the pyramid is 24.3 cm^2.

We can check that the probabilities sum to 1:

P(X=2) + P(X=3) + P(X=4) + P(X=5) + P(X=6) + P(X=7) + P(X

The sum X of rolling an 8-sided die and a 6-sided die can take values from 2 to 14.

To find the probability distribution of X, we need to calculate the probability of each possible outcome.

For example, to get a sum of 2, we must roll a 1 on the 8-sided die and a 1 on the 6-sided die. The probability of rolling a 1 on an 8-sided die is 1/8, and the probability of rolling a 1 on a 6-sided die is 1/6. Therefore, the probability of getting a sum of 2 is:

P(X=2) = (1/8) * (1/6) = 1/48

Similarly, we can calculate the probabilities for all possible values of X:

P(X=3) = (1/8) * (2/6) + (2/8) * (1/6) = 1/16

P(X=4) = (1/8) * (3/6) + (2/8) * (2/6) + (3/8) * (1/6) = 1/8

P(X=5) = (1/8) * (4/6) + (2/8) * (3/6) + (3/8) * (2/6) + (4/8) * (1/6) = 5/32

P(X=6) = (1/8) * (5/6) + (2/8) * (4/6) + (3/8) * (3/6) + (4/8) * (2/6) + (5/8) * (1/6) = 11/32

P(X=7) = (1/8) * (6/6) + (2/8) * (5/6) + (3/8) * (4/6) + (4/8) * (3/6) + (5/8) * (2/6) + (6/8) * (1/6) = 21/32

P(X=8) = (2/8) * (6/6) + (3/8) * (5/6) + (4/8) * (4/6) + (5/8) * (3/6) + (6/8) * (2/6) = 25/32

P(X=9) = (3/8) * (6/6) + (4/8) * (5/6) + (5/8) * (4/6) + (6/8) * (3/6) = 19/32

P(X=10) = (4/8) * (6/6) + (5/8) * (5/6) + (6/8) * (4/6) = 13/32

P(X=11) = (5/8) * (6/6) + (6/8) * (5/6) = 11/32

P(X=12) = (6/8) * (6/6) = 3/8

P(X=13) = 0

P(X=14) = 0

We can check that the probabilities sum to 1:

P(X=2) + P(X=3) + P(X=4) + P(X=5) + P(X=6) + P(X=7) + P(X

To learn more about probabilities visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15124899

#SPJ11

If we follow Kaizen's principle and improve by 1% each day, we can get approximately 37.78 times better in a year.

If we follow Kaizen's principle of improving by 1% each day, we can calculate how much better we will get in a year by using the formula:

Final Value = Initial Value x (1 + Daily Improvement Percentage)^Number of Days

Since we are trying to calculate how much better we can get in a year, we can plug in the following values:

Initial Value = 1 (assuming we are starting from our current level of performance)

Daily Improvement Percentage = 0.01 (since we are trying to improve by 1% each day)

Number of Days = 365 (since there are 365 days in a year)

Using these values, we get:

Final Value = 1 x (1 + 0.01)³⁶⁵

Final Value ≈ 1 x 37.78

Final Value ≈ 37.78

This shows the power of continuous improvement and the importance of consistent effort towards our goals.

To learn more about improving click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29278250

#SPJ1

There are 72 ways a customer can select a meal consisting of one choice from each category

This is an example of the multiplication principle of counting. The multiplication principle states that if there are m ways to do one thing, and n ways to do another thing after the first thing is done, then there are m x n ways to do both things together.

In this problem, there are 4 main courses to choose from, 3 desserts to choose from, and 6 drinks to choose from. Using the multiplication principle, we can find the total number of ways to select a meal by multiplying the number of choices for each category:

Total number of ways = 4 x 3 x 6 = 72

Therefore, there are 72 ways to select a meal consisting of one choice from each category.

Learn more about multiplication at https://brainly.com/question/23036007

#SPJ11

The general solution of the differential equation is:

xy^2/2 + x^2y + (x^2/2)y - (x^2/4)y^2 + h(x) = C

where C is the constant of integration.

To solve this differential equation, we can use the method of exact differential equations.

First, we need to check if the equation is exact by verifying if the following condition is satisfied:

∂(y^2 + xy)/∂y = ∂(x^2)/∂x

Differentiating y^2 + xy with respect to y, we get:

∂(y^2 + xy)/∂y = 2y + x

Differentiating x^2 with respect to x, we get:

∂(x^2)/∂x = 2x

Since these two expressions are equal, the equation is exact.

To find the general solution, we need to find a function f(x,y) such that:

∂f/∂x = y^2 + xy

∂f/∂y = x^2

Integrating the first equation with respect to x, we get:

f(x,y) = xy^2/2 + x^2y + g(y)

where g(y) is a constant of integration that depends only on y.

Taking the partial derivative of f(x,y) with respect to y and equating it to x^2, we get:

∂f/∂y = x^2 = xy + 2xg'(y)

where g'(y) is the derivative of g(y) with respect to y.

Solving for g'(y), we get:

g'(y) = (x^2 - xy)/2x

Integrating both sides with respect to y, we get:

g(y) = (x^2/2)y - (x^2/4)y^2 + h(x)

where h(x) is a constant of integration that depends only on x.

Therefore, the general solution of the differential equation is:

xy^2/2 + x^2y + (x^2/2)y - (x^2/4)y^2 + h(x) = C

where C is the constant of integration.

To learn more about expressions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30265549

#SPJ11

The two events are rolling a 1 on fair die and rolling even number .

Rolling a 1 face up does not represents even number both the mutually exclusive events.

Rolling a fair die twice represents independent events.

Main difference is both will not occur at the same time.

Mutually exclusive events represents the events are disjoint set.

Suppose from the field of interest like to studying,

The events of rolling a '1' on a fair six-sided die and rolling an 'even number' on the same die.

A scenario in which these events are mutually exclusive is,

When the die shows a '1' face-up after rolling.

The event of rolling an even number did not occur since '1' is an odd number.

Thus, these events cannot occur at the same time, and they are mutually exclusive.

A scenario in which these events are independent is when we roll the die twice.

The first roll may result in an odd or even number.

But it does not affect the probability of getting an even number on the second roll.

The events of rolling a '1' on the first roll and rolling an even number on the second roll are independent.

As the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of the other event happening.

The main difference between mutually exclusive and independent events is,

That mutually exclusive events cannot occur at the same time.

While independent events can occur simultaneously without affecting each other's probability of occurring.

learn more about events here

brainly.com/question/17136647

#SPJ1

a) Yes, it is reasonable to use t-distribution to perform a test about average gas price. (b) There is evidence that average gas price on August 8, 2012 was higher than national average at 5% significance level. (c) 95% confidence interval lies between $3.813 and $4.137.

a) Yes, it is reasonable to use the t-distribution to perform a test about the average gas price since the sample size n = 10 is small and the population standard deviation is unknown.

b) To test for the evidence, we can perform a one-sample t-test.

t = (sample mean - hypothesized mean) / (sample standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

t = (3.975 - 3.63) / (0.2266 / sqrt(10))

t = 2.728

Using a t-table the critical t-value is 1.833 which is less than calculated t-value (2.728) ), therefore, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence that the average gas price was significantly higher than the national average at the 5% significance level.

c) The standard error can be calculated as:

standard error = sample standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)

standard error = 0.2266 / sqrt(10)

standard error = 0.0717

Using a t-table, the t-value is 2.262. Therefore, the 95% confidence interval is:

(sample mean) ± (t-value * standard error)

3.975 ± (2.262 * 0.0717)

3.975 ± 0.162

(3.813, 4.137)

So we can be 95% confident that the true mean gas price in Illinois on August 8, 2012 lies between $3.813 and $4.137.

Know more about confidence interval here:

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ11

The solution for U(x,t) is:

U(x,t) = Σ[infinity]n=1 sin(nπx/Φ) sin(nπt

To find the partial differential equation for the given problem, we can use the wave equation:

Utt - c^2Uxx = 0

where c is the wave speed. In this case, c^2 = 1 since the problem is given as Uttxx = Uxx. Therefore, we have:

Utt - Uxx = 0

with the initial conditions U(x,0) = 1 and Ut(x,0) = 0, and the boundary conditions U(0,t) = U(Φ,t) = 0.

This is a standard wave equation with homogeneous boundary conditions, and can be solved using separation of variables. We assume a solution of the form:

U(x,t) = X(x)T(t)

Substituting this into the PDE, we get:

X(x)T''(t) - X''(x)T(t) = 0

Dividing by XT and rearranging, we get:

T''(t)/T(t) = X''(x)/X(x)

Since the left-hand side depends only on t and the right-hand side depends only on x, both sides must be constant. Letting this constant be λ^2, we get:

T''(t)/T(t) = λ^2 = X''(x)/X(x)

Solving for X(x), we get:

X(x) = A sin(λx) + B cos(λx)

Applying the boundary conditions U(0,t) = U(Φ,t) = 0, we get:

X(0) = A sin(0) + B cos(0) = 0

X(Φ) = A sin(λΦ) + B cos(λΦ) = 0

Since sin(0) = 0 and sin(λΦ) = 0 (for nonzero λ), we have B = 0 and λΦ = nπ, where n is an integer. Therefore, λ = nπ/Φ, and the solution for X(x) is:

X(x) = A sin(nπx/Φ)

Substituting this back into the equation for T(t), we get:

T''(t)/T(t) = (nπ/Φ)^2

Solving for T(t), we get:

T(t) = C1 cos(nπt/Φ) + C2 sin(nπt/Φ)

The general solution for U(x,t) is then:

U(x,t) = Σ[infinity]n=1(A_n sin(nπx/Φ)) (C1_n cos(nπt/Φ) + C2_n sin(nπt/Φ))

Using the initial conditions U(x,0) = 1 and Ut(x,0) = 0, we get:

A_n = 2/Φ ∫[0]Φ U(x,0) sin(nπx/Φ) dx = 2/Φ ∫[0]Φ sin(nπx/Φ) dx = 2/Φ (Φ/2) = 1

C1_n = U_t(x,0) = 0

C2_n = 2/Φ ∫[0]Φ U(x,0) sin(nπx/Φ) dx = 2/Φ ∫[0]Φ sin(nπx/Φ) dx = 0

Therefore, the solution for U(x,t) is:

U(x,t) = Σ[infinity]n=1 sin(nπx/Φ) sin(nπt

To learn more about conditions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13044823

#SPJ11

Answer: x =11

Step-by-step explanation:

A 5% risk of being wrong, as accepted by convention in psychology, is an acceptable level of risk as it balances decisions making and potential for error well. The costs of lowering the risk to 1% requires more time and efforts.

In my opinion, a 5% risk of being wrong is a generally acceptable level of risk in many situations in psychology. This is because it balances the need for making decisions with the potential for error.

If we were to lower the risk to 1%, it might require more time, resources, and effort to gather additional evidence and conduct more in-depth analysis. This could slow down the decision-making process, which might not be desirable in certain situations.

Ultimately, the acceptable level of risk depends on the context and the potential consequences of the decision being made. If the consequences of a wrong decision are severe, it may be worthwhile to invest in reducing the risk to 1% or lower.

However, for most everyday decisions, a 5% risk of being wrong is a reasonable compromise between accuracy and efficiency.

Know more about psychology here:

https://brainly.com/question/12011520

#SPJ11

Answer:

y = -3(x - 5)^2 + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Because we're given the maximum/vertex of the quadratic function and at least one of the roots, we can find the equation of the quadratic equation using the vertex form which is

[tex]y = a(x-h)^2+k[/tex], where a is a constant (determine whether parabola will have maximum or minimum), (h, k) is the vertex (a maximum for this problem), and (x, y) are any point on the parabola:

Since our maximum/vertex is (5, 3), and one of our roots is (6, 0), we can plug everything in and solve for a:

[tex]0=a(6-5)^2+3\\0=a(1)^2+3\\0=a+3\\-3=a[/tex]

Thus, the general equation (without distribution) is y = -3(x - 5)^2 + 3

To find a polynomial function of the lowest degree with rational coefficients and given zeros -3i and 5, we first need to remember that complex zeros always come in conjugate pairs. Since -3i is one of the zeros, its conjugate 3i is also a zero.

Now, let's find the polynomial using these zeros: (x - (-3i))(x - 3i)(x - 5). We can rewrite this as:

(x + 3i)(x - 3i)(x - 5)

Now, let's multiply the first two factors:

(x^2 - 3ix + 3ix + 9) (x - 5)

Simplifying this gives us:

(x^2 + 9)(x - 5)

Now, let's multiply this with the remaining factor:

x^3 - 5x^2 + 9x - 45

So, the polynomial function of the lowest degree with rational coefficients that has the given zeros -3i and 5 is:

f(x) = x^3 - 5x^2 + 9x - 45

To learn more about conjugate pairs : brainly.com/question/7325000

#SPJ11

A graph of the image after a dilation by a scale factor of 2 centered at the origin is shown below.

In Mathematics and Geometry, a dilation simply refers to a type of transformation which typically changes the size of a geometric object, but not its shape.

Next, we would apply a dilation to the coordinates of the pre-image by using a scale factor of 2 centered at the origin as follows:

Ordered pair R (0, -2) → Ordered pair R' (0 × 2, -2 × 2) = R' (0, -4).

Ordered pair S (0, 3) → Ordered pair S' (0 × 2, 3 × 2) = S' (0, 6).

Ordered pair T (2, -4) → Ordered pair T' (2 × 2, -4 × 2) = T' (4, -8).

Read more on dilation and scale factor here: brainly.com/question/4421026

#SPJ1

We have shown that A is a subset of B and that B is not a subset of A, we can conclude that A and B are not equal, i.e., A ≠ B.

a. To prove that A is a subset of B, we need to show that every element in A is also in B. Let n be an arbitrary element in A. Then, we have to show that n is also in B, i.e., n = 10r + 2 for some integer r. Since n is in A, we know that n = 5q + 2 for some integer q. We can rewrite this as:

n = 10q + 2q + 2

= 10q + 2(q + 1)

= 10r + 2

where r = q + 1. Since r is an integer, we have shown that n is in B. Therefore, A is a subset of B.

b. To disprove that B is a subset of A, we need to find at least one element in B that is not in A. Let m = 5s + 3 for some integer s be an arbitrary element in B. We need to show that m is not in A, i.e., m ≠ 10r + 2 for any integer r. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that m = 10r + 2 for some integer r. Then we have:

5s + 3 = 10r + 2

5s = 10r - 1

s = 2r - 1/5

Since s and r are both integers, this is a contradiction. Therefore, there is no integer r that satisfies the equation above, and m is not in A. Thus, we have shown that B is not a subset of A.

c. Since we have shown that A is a subset of B and that B is not a subset of A, we can conclude that A and B are not equal, i.e., A ≠ B.

To learn more about conclude visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9070396

#SPJ11

The square root of 41 must lie between 6 and 7, as 6² = 36 and 7² = 49, and 41 lies between these two values.

The estimate of a non-exact square root of x is done finding two numbers, as follows:

For the number 41, these numbers are given as follows:

Hence we know that the square root of 41 lies between 6 and 7.

More can be learned about the estimation of the square root of a number at brainly.com/question/28734995

#SPJ1

The value of the vector [tex]proj_{vu}[/tex] is <-972/169, -405/169>. (option d).

The projection of one vector onto another vector can be thought of as the shadow of one vector onto another in the direction of the second vector. Mathematically, the projection of vector v onto vector u can be calculated as follows:

[tex]proj_{vu}[/tex] = (v · u / ||u||²) x u

Here, · denotes the dot product of two vectors, and ||u|| denotes the magnitude or length of vector u.

Now, let's apply this formula to the given vectors u and v:

u = <-12,-5>

v = <3,9>

To calculate [tex]proj_{vu}[/tex], we first need to find the dot product of vectors u and v:

u · v = (-12 x 3) + (-5 x 9) = -36 - 45 = -81

Next, we need to find the magnitude of vector u:

||u|| = √((-12)² + (-5)²) = √(144 + 25) = √169 = 13

Now, we can substitute the values we have found into the formula for [tex]proj_{vu}[/tex]:

[tex]proj_{vu}[/tex] = (-81 / (13²)) x <-12,-5> = <-81/13, -405/169>

Therefore, the answer to the given question is option (d): [tex]proj_{vu}[/tex] = <-972/169, -405/169>.

To know more about vector here

https://brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ1

Rounding to the nearest dollar, we get an account balance of $3,796. Therefore, the answer is (b) $3,796. Option b is Correct.

A financial repository's account balance represents the amount of money there is at the end of the current accounting period. It is the sum of the balance carried over from the previous month and the net difference between the credits and debits that have been recorded during any particular accounting cycle.

The future value of an annuity with monthly contributions:

FV = [tex]P * ((1 + r/12)^{n - 1}) / (r/12)[/tex]

Here FV is the future value, P is the monthly payment, r is the annual interest rate, and n is the number of months.

In this case, P = $150, r = 5.5%, and n = 24 months (2 years * 12 months/year). Plugging in these values, we get:

FV =[tex]150 * ((1 + 0.055/12)^24 - 1) / (0.055/12)[/tex]

≈ $3,795.88

Learn more about account balance visit: brainly.com/question/31393384

#SPJ4

The area of rhombus is 120 square units.

We are given that;

The diagonals = 12, 20

Now,

Area of rhombus = 4 x area of one triangle

Area of triangle= 1/2 * 6 * 10

=5 * 6

=30

Area of rhombus= 4 * 30

=120

Therefore, by the area the answer will be 120 square units.

Learn more about the area;

https://brainly.com/question/1658516

#SPJ1

Rounding up, we need a sample size of n = 443 to be 99% confident that our estimate of the population mean is within 4 of the true population mean.

The formula to calculate the sample size needed to estimate a population mean with a specified margin of error is:

n = (z^2 * σ^2) / E^2

Where:

z = the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (in this case 99%, which gives z = 2.576)

σ = the population standard deviation

E = the desired margin of error

Plugging in the values given in the problem, we get:

n = (2.576^2 * 33.9^2) / 4^2

n = 442.74

Rounding up, we need a sample size of n = 443 to be 99% confident that our estimate of the population mean is within 4 of the true population mean.

To learn more about corresponding visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1597341

#SPJ11

To solve the system of equations using elimination by pivoting, we will first identify the coefficients of the variables in each equation and write them in a matrix form. Then, we will use pivoting to eliminate the off-diagonal elements and solve for the variables.

For example, let's consider the system of equations:

2x + 3y - z = 7
3x - 4y + 2z = -8
x + y - z = 3

We can write this system in matrix form as:

[ 2  3 -1 |  7 ]
[ 3 -4  2 | -8 ]
[ 1  1 -1 |  3 ]

To eliminate the off-diagonal elements, we will use pivoting. We will pivot on the entry (2, 1), then on (3, 2), and finally on (1, 3). This means we will swap rows and/or columns to make the pivot element (the one we want to eliminate) the largest in absolute value.

First, we will pivot on (2, 1). We swap rows 1 and 2 to make the pivot element the largest in the first column:

[ 3 -4  2 | -8 ]
[ 2  3 -1 |  7 ]
[ 1  1 -1 |  3 ]

Next, we will pivot on (3, 2). We swap rows 2 and 3 to make the pivot element the largest in the second column:

[ 3 -4  2 | -8 ]
[ 2  3 -1 |  7 ]
[ 1 -1 -1 | -1 ]

Finally, we will pivot on (1, 3). We swap columns 2 and 3 to make the pivot element the largest in the third column:

[ 3  2 -4 | -8 ]
[ 2 -1  3 |  7 ]
[ 1 -1  1 | -1 ]

Now we have a matrix in row echelon form. We can solve for the variables by back substitution. Starting with the last equation, we get:

z = -1

Substituting this value into the second equation, we get:

-1y + 3x = 10

Solving for y, we get:

y = -3x + 10

Substituting the values of z and y into the first equation, we get:

3x + 2(-3x + 10) - 4(-1) = -8

Solving for x, we get:

x = 2

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is:

x = 2
y = 4
z = -1

Learn more about the system of equations:

https://brainly.com/question/31040465

#SPJ11