Answer:
false
Explanation:
how did countries in latin america, africa, and asia integrate themselves into the global economy in the late twentieth century? select all that apply.
Answer:
In the late twentieth century, countries in Latin America, Africa, and Asia integrated themselves into the global economy in a variety of ways, including:
Export-oriented growth: Many developing countries pursued export-oriented growth strategies, which involved focusing on the production and export of goods for the global market. This approach was particularly popular in Latin America and Asia, where countries such as Brazil, Mexico, and South Korea became major exporters of manufactured goods and commodities such as oil, soybeans, and electronics.Foreign direct investment: Another way in which developing countries integrated themselves into the global economy was through foreign direct investment (FDI), which involved attracting investment from foreign companies and investors. This approach was particularly popular in Africa, where countries such as Nigeria and South Africa attracted significant FDI in sectors such as mining and telecommunications.Liberalization and privatization: Many developing countries also pursued policies of economic liberalization and privatization, which involved reducing government regulation and control of the economy and promoting private enterprise. This approach was particularly popular in Latin America, where countries such as Chile and Argentina implemented market-oriented reforms in the 1990s.Regional integration: Some developing countries also integrated themselves into the global economy through regional integration, which involved forming economic alliances and integrating their economies with those of neighboring countries. This approach was particularly popular in Latin America, where countries such as Mexico and Brazil were members of regional trading blocs such as NAFTA and Mercosur.Overall, the integration of developing countries into the global economy in the late twentieth century involved a range of approaches, including export-oriented growth, foreign direct investment, liberalization and privatization, and regional integration. While these approaches brought some benefits, such as increased trade and investment, they also posed challenges, such as increased competition and volatility in global markets, and uneven distribution of benefits within and between countries.
after which event did the united states and the soviet union emerge as superpowers with respect to the rest of the world? responses the united states civil war the united states civil war the promulgation of the monroe doctrine the promulgation of the monroe doctrine the first world war the first world war the second world war
The United States and the Soviet Union emerged as superpowers with respect to the rest of the world after the Second World War.
The Second World War was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945, involving many of the world's nations, including the United States and the Soviet Union. The United States entered the war in 1941 after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, while the Soviet Union joined the Allies in 1941 after being invaded by Nazi Germany.The war had a significant impact on the global balance of power, as it resulted in the defeat of Germany and Japan, and the emergence of the United States and the Soviet Union as the dominant superpowers. The two nations were left standing as the strongest economic, political, and military powers in the world, with the ability to influence global affairs and shape the post-war international system.The United States and the Soviet Union then became engaged in the Cold War, a period of intense political and military tension between the two superpowers that lasted until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Learn more about Second world War here:
https://brainly.com/question/30554534
#SPJ11
Of all the newly opened territories west of the Appalachians in the early nineteenth century, which state was the first to attract settlers and also was the seedbed of revivalism?
kentucky
Kentucky was the first state to attract settlers west of the Appalachians and also became known as the seedbed of revivalism due to the significant religious revivals that took place there in the early nineteenth century.
"Significant religious" is a term that refers to a religion or belief system that has a notable impact on society, culture, or history. These religions have millions of followers worldwide and have a significant influence on the way people think, behave, and interact with one another. Examples of significant religions include Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism, among others. These religions often have their own set of beliefs, practices, and rituals that are considered sacred by their followers. They have also played a crucial role in shaping the world's history, art, and architecture, and have contributed to the development of philosophy, science, and literature.
Learn more about Significant religious here:
https://brainly.com/question/14987425
#SPJ11
OF all the newly opened territories at the west of the Appalachians in the early nineteenth century, the first to attract settlers and also was the seedbed of revivalism was Kentucky.
Kentucky's fertile lands and navigable waterways made it an ideal location for settlers to establish new homes and communities. Additionally, the region was less prone to conflicts with Native Americans compared to other western territories, making it a more appealing destination.
Kentucky also became the seedbed of revivalism during this period. The Second Great Awakening, a religious revival movement, gained significant momentum in Kentucky in the early 1800s. The movement emphasized individualism, religious fervor, and a renewed commitment to personal faith.
The Cane Ridge Revival in 1801, which took place in Bourbon County, Kentucky, is a notable example of this revivalist fervor. Thousands of people gathered to hear fiery sermons, participate in emotional worship, and commit themselves to a more devoted Christian life.
The revivalism in Kentucky played a vital role in shaping the social and cultural landscape of the region. It encouraged the growth of new Protestant denominations, such as the Baptists and Methodists, and led to an increase in church membership. The religious fervor also contributed to various reform movements, including temperance and the abolition of slavery, and helped establish a sense of shared moral values among the settlers.
In summary, Kentucky was the first state to attract settlers west of the Appalachians due to its favorable geographic features and relatively peaceful relations with Native Americans. The state also served as the seedbed of revivalism, as the Second Great Awakening ignited religious passion and social reform throughout the region.
To learn more about Kentucky refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12781171
#SPJ11
americans justified the forced removal of native americans to lands west of the mississippi river because: question 1 options: a) smallpox epidemics had devastated native communities and white reformers hoped moving them to reservations would make it easier to inoculate them. b) they believed white farmers would make better use of the land and resources than the indigenous inhabitants. c) the lands in the great plains were more fertile for indian crops like corn, so removal was actually seen as providing nutritional benefits to natives. d) all of the above.
The Americans justified the forced removal of Native Americans to lands west of the Mississippi River because they believed white farmers would make better use of the land and resources than the indigenous inhabitants.
This refers to the concept of Manifest Destiny, which was a belief prevalent in the 19th century that the expansion of the United States was both justified and inevitable. Many white Americans believed that they had a God-given right to the land and resources of North America, and that the indigenous inhabitants were obstacles to this expansion. As a result, the US government forcibly removed Native American tribes from their ancestral lands and relocated them to reservations in the west. This policy was enforced through the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which resulted in the infamous Trail of Tears, during which thousands of Native Americans died while being forcibly relocated. The justification for this policy was often framed in terms of "civilizing" the Native Americans, but in reality, it was driven by a desire for land and resources.
Learn more about manifest destiny here:
https://brainly.com/question/11669373
#SPJ11
1. estonia was an independent country until 1939 when stalin and hitler signed the molotov-ribbentrop pact that had a secret clause dividing europe between the two nations. soviet troops soon occupied estonia as a result of this pact. after the soviet troops invaded estonia there was one soviet solider for about how many estonians? group of answer choices 1 soviet solider for every 5 estonian 1 soviet solider for every 18 estonian 1 soviet solider for every 12 estonian 1 soviet solider for every 10 estonian
After the Soviet troops invaded Estonia in the 1940, there was approximately one Soviet soldier for every 12 Estonians.
What are troops?Troops refer to a group of soldiers or military personnel organized and trained for combat, often under the command of a higher-ranking officer. These individuals are equipped with weapons and gear to carry out their duties, which may include defending their country, supporting allies, or engaging in offensive operations. Troops can be composed of various branches of the military, such as the army, navy, air force, or marines. They may be deployed to different locations within their own country or to foreign countries as part of a military mission. Troops undergo rigorous training to prepare them for the physical and mental demands of combat, including weapons training, physical fitness, and tactical strategy.
To learn more about troops, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14379057
#SPJ1
How are the people of Washington working to address the problem of overfishing in their state? Choose three correct answers.
by limiting fishing for recreational purposes
by closing some fisheries in tribal communities
by setting a rate on harvesting certain types of fish
by removing salmon from the diet of most tribal groups
by increasing the construction of dams along the area’s rivers
by banning all salmon and steelhead trout fishing along the coast
Answer: - By limiting fishing for recreational purposes
- By closing some fisheries in tribal communities
- By setting a rate on harvesting certain types of fish
Explanation: The people of Washington are working to address the problem of overfishing in their state through the following three correct approaches:
By limiting fishing for recreational purposes: Washington has implemented regulations and restrictions on recreational fishing to manage fish populations and prevent overfishing. These limitations can include catch limits, size restrictions, and seasonal closures to protect vulnerable species and ensure sustainable fishing practices.
By closing some fisheries in tribal communities: The state of Washington works closely with tribal communities to manage fisheries sustainably. In some cases, fisheries may be temporarily closed or restricted in tribal areas to allow fish populations to recover and ensure long-term sustainability.
By setting a rate on harvesting certain types of fish: Washington has implemented fishing quotas and catch limits for certain species to prevent overfishing and ensure their populations can thrive. These quotas are based on scientific assessments of fish stocks and are designed to maintain a sustainable balance between fishing activities and the health of the ecosystems.
Slave labor so dominated the rice plantations of ________ from its founding that by 1730 a majority of its population was black.
A) Georgia
B) Florida
C) Virginia
D) South Carolina
Slave labor so dominated the rice plantations of D) South Carolina from its founding that by 1730 a majority of its population was black.
In the early years of its founding, South Carolina relied closely on slave labor for its agricultural manufacturing, specially within the cultivation of rice.
The labor-in depth technique of developing and harvesting rice required a big workforce, and slaves have been added in from Africa to work at the plantations. via 1730, the majority of the population in South Carolina become made of black slaves, and the financial system turned into in large part primarily based on agriculture, with rice being the number one crop. the use of slave exertions continued in South Carolina for decades, and it turned into no longer till after the Civil conflict that slavery become ultimately abolished and the economic system began to diversify.
Learn more about South Carolina:-
https://brainly.com/question/28658760
#SPJ4
Slave labor so dominated the rice plantations of South Carolina from its founding that by 1730 a majority of its population was black
South Carolina was a major center of slave labor in the United States from the colonial period through the Civil War. The state's economy was largely built on the labor of enslaved African Americans, who were brought to South Carolina from the 17th century through the 19th century to work on plantations, in mines, and in other industries.
Enslaved Africans in South Carolina worked in a variety of industries, including rice and indigo cultivation, timber harvesting, mining, and domestic service. The labor of enslaved Africans was critical to the economic success of the state, and slave owners in South Carolina were some of the wealthiest in the country.
Conditions for enslaved Africans in South Carolina were harsh and brutal. They were often subjected to physical abuse, forced labor, and harsh living conditions. Families were often separated, with children being sold away from their parents. Slaves were denied basic human rights and freedoms and were treated as property rather than people.
Visit here to learn more about Slave labor brainly.com/question/855690
#SPJ11
what finally prompted the armistice in the korean war? what were the costs of this war: human, monetary, political?
The Korean War ended with an armistice in 1953 due to a military stalemate and international pressure. The war had a high human cost and economic costs exceeding $1 trillion. It led to a continued division of Korea and shaped the geopolitical landscape of East Asia for decades.
The Korean War began in 1950 when North Korean forces crossed the 38th parallel into South Korea, leading to a United Nations-led military intervention to support South Korea.
However, the war reached a stalemate by 1951 with little territorial gain made by either side. International pressure, including the threat of Chinese intervention and Soviet diplomatic efforts, led to negotiations for a ceasefire. It was only after two years of negotiations that the armistice agreement was signed on July 27, 1953.
The human cost of the war was significant, with an estimated 2.5 million civilian and military casualties. Many Koreans were displaced from their homes, with families separated by the border between North and South Korea. The economic cost of the war exceeded $1 trillion in today's currency, and the division of Korea had significant political implications, shaping the geopolitical landscape of East Asia for decades to come.
To know more about Korean War, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126#
#SPJ11
during the 1980s and continuing into the 1990s, the governments of argentina, brazil, and chile moved politically toward . . .
During the 1980s and continuing into the 1990s, the governments of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile moved politically toward democratic governance and market-oriented economic reforms.
During this period, these countries underwent significant political and economic transformations, often referred to as the "Third Wave of Democratization" and the "Washington Consensus" economic reforms. Some common trends in the political and economic developments of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile during this time include:
Democratization: After periods of authoritarian rule, Argentina, Brazil, and Chile transitioned to democratic governance. Military dictatorships in Argentina (1976-1983), Brazil (1964-1985), and Chile (1973-1990) gave way to democratic governments that promoted political pluralism, civil liberties, and the rule of law.
Market-oriented economic reforms: These countries implemented market-oriented economic reforms under the guidance of international financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. These reforms included measures such as liberalization of trade and investment, deregulation, privatization of state-owned enterprises, and fiscal austerity.
To learn more about market-oriented economic reforms, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/11982639
#SPJ4
During the 1980s and continuing into the 1990s, the governments of Argentina, Brazil, and Chile moved politically toward neoliberalism, which emphasized free market economics, privatization of state-owned enterprises, and reduction of government intervention in the economy.
This shift was largely influenced by the economic crises and debt burdens that these countries faced, as well as the pressures of international financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. The implementation of neoliberal policies had significant impacts on these countries' economies, societies, and political systems, and continues to be a topic of debate and controversy.
In addition to political changes, these countries also implemented market-oriented economic policies that were aimed at promoting economic growth and development. This included reducing state control over the economy, opening up markets to foreign investment, and implementing structural adjustment programs that were designed to reduce government spending and increase efficiency.
For more question on privatization
https://brainly.com/question/30516182
#SPJ11
what does robert putnam believe is the single most important consequence of the television revolution of the latter part of the 20th century?
Answer: What does Robert Putnam believe is the single most important consequence of the television revolution of the latter part of the 20th century? ((People stayed home and watch TV and have less interaction with others.))
Explanation: sorry if this isn't what your looking for!
but hope it helps at least a bit!