using traditional methods, it takes 99 hours to receive a basic driving license. a new license training method using computer aided instruction (cai) has been proposed. a researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 98 hours. assume the standard deviation is known to be 7 . a level of significance of 0.1 will be used to determine if the technique performs differently than the traditional method. is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method? what is the conclusion?

15bags of fiber stuffing will be needed to fill the cones

The volume of one replica ice cream cone is calculated as:

Volume = (1/3) × π × (radius)^2 × height

Radius = 4/2 = 2 inches

Height = 10 inches

Therefore, Volume = (1/3) × π × 2^2 × 10 = 83.78 cubic inches (rounded to two decimal places)

To fill 125 replica cones, the total volume of stuffing required will be:

Total Volume = 125 × 83.78 = 10,472.5 cubic inches

Since each bag of stuffing can fill 720 cubic inches, the number of bags required will be:

Number of bags = 10,472.5 / 720 = 14.55 (rounded up to the nearest whole number)

Learn more about volume at https://brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ1

The coefficients of determination that are incorrect are -.88, 1.15, and 1.45.

The coefficient of determination, also known as R-squared, is a value between 0 and 1 that measures the proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the independent variable(s) in a regression model.

Values outside the range of 0 to 1, such as negative values or values greater than 1, are not valid coefficients of determination. In this case, -.88, 1.15, and 1.45 are incorrect because they fall outside the valid range.

The correct coefficients of determination in the given list are .77, .53, .11, and -.34. These values indicate the proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the corresponding independent variables in their respective regression models.

To know more about the coefficient of determination visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31601139

#SPJ11

To evaluate the integral of 5.3x^2 dx using trapezoidal rule with n = 10, we first need to break the interval [0, 5.3] into 10 subintervals of equal width. The width of each subinterval, h, is given by:

h = (b - a) / n = (5.3 - 0) / 10 = 0.53

where a = 0 is the lower limit of integration and b = 5.3 is the upper limit of integration.

Next, we need to calculate the function values at the endpoints of each subinterval. Let xi be the left endpoint of the ith subinterval, then:

x1 = 0
x2 = 0.53
x3 = 1.06
x4 = 1.59
x5 = 2.12
x6 = 2.65
x7 = 3.18
x8 = 3.71
x9 = 4.24
x10 = 4.77

Using these values, we can calculate the function values at each endpoint:

f(x1) = 5.3(0)^2 = 0
f(x2) = 5.3(0.53)^2 = 0.769547
f(x3) = 5.3(1.06)^2 = 6.119948
f(x4) = 5.3(1.59)^2 = 15.013238
f(x5) = 5.3(2.12)^2 = 28.451232
f(x6) = 5.3(2.65)^2 = 46.433928
f(x7) = 5.3(3.18)^2 = 68.961326
f(x8) = 5.3(3.71)^2 = 96.033426
f(x9) = 5.3(4.24)^2 = 127.650228
f(x10) = 5.3(4.77)^2 = 163.811732

Now, we can apply the trapezoidal rule formula to approximate the integral:

∫[0,5.3] 5.3x^2 dx ≈ h/2 * [f(x1) + 2f(x2) + 2f(x3) + ... + 2f(x9) + f(x10)]

Substituting the values we calculated above, we get:

∫[0,5.3] 5.3x^2 dx ≈ 0.53/2 * [0 + 2(0.769547) + 2(6.119948) + 2(15.013238) + 2(28.451232) + 2(46.433928) + 2(68.961326) + 2(96.033426) + 2(127.650228) + 163.811732]

∫[0,5.3] 5.3x^2 dx ≈ 614.660107

Therefore, the approximate value of the integral of 5.3x^2 dx using trapezoidal rule with n = 10 is 614.660107.

#SPJ11

Learn more about trapezoidal rule on: https://brainly.com/question/16996659

The longest possible distance that the couple of frogs can create between each other is (n-1)/2, where n is the number of blocks from 0 to n-1.

To understand why, we can think about two cases: when n is odd and when n is even.

When n is odd, the two frogs can start at the ends of the line, with one frog on block 0 and the other frog on block n-1. They can then both jump to the middle block (block (n-1)/2) and create a distance of (n-1)/2 between them.

When n is even, the two frogs cannot start at the ends of the line because there is no middle block. However, they can start on adjacent blocks, such as blocks (n-2)/2 and (n+2)/2. They can then both jump to the block in the middle of the line (block n/2) and create a distance of (n-2)/2 between them.

In both cases, the longest possible distance between the two frogs is (n-1)/2.

To know more about longest possible distance, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/12102113#
#SPJ11

The equation shows that the probability of transitioning from state i to state j, considering all possible paths, can be expressed as the product of the probability of staying in state i and the probability of transitioning from state i to state j without revisiting state i when i ≠ j is Pij(s) = Pii(s) Lij(s).

To answer your question, let's consider the terms provided: lij(n), Lij(s), and Pij(s).

Given that lij(n) represents the probability of transitioning from state i to state j in n steps without revisiting state i, Lij(s) is the sum of probabilities multiplied by s^n:

Lij(s) = Σsⁿlij(n), for n = 1 to infinity.

Now, let's relate Lij(s) to Pij(s). Pij(s) represents the probability of transitioning from state i to state j in any number of steps, considering all possible paths. When i ≠ j, we can use the fact that the chain must pass through state i without revisiting it.

We can write Pij(s) as a product of two probabilities: the probability of transitioning from state i to itself, denoted by Pii(s), and the probability of transitioning from state i to state j without revisiting i, denoted by Lij(s). Thus, for i ≠ j, we have:

Pij(s) = Pii(s) Lij(s).

This equation shows that the probability of transitioning from state i to state j, considering all possible paths, can be expressed as the product of the probability of staying in state i and the probability of transitioning from state i to state j without revisiting state i when i ≠ j.

Learn more about "probability": https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

Answer:

y is 96 when x is 12

Step-by-step explanation:

If x and y vary directly, it means that they are proportional to each other. Mathematically, we can write this relationship as:

y = kx

where k is the constant of proportionality.To find the value of k, we can use the information given in the problem. We know that when x is 6, y is 48. Substituting these values in the equation above, we get:

48 = k * 6

Solving for k, we get:k = 8

Now that we know the value of k, we can use the equation to find y when x is 12:

y = kx

y = 8 * 12

y = 96

Therefore, when x is 12, y is 96.

also in my head I just said if 12 is double of 6, just double 48, which is 96. but that doesn’t always work so that’s why I provided “correct” work above

In this table, for every increase of 2 in the number of string instruments, there is a corresponding increase of 4 in the number of percussion instruments. Therefore, the ratio of string instruments to percussion instruments is always 2:1, indicating a constant of proportionality of 2.

However, rather than being started by plucking or sliding a bow across the strings, those vibrations on a piano are started by hammers striking the strings. Consequently, the piano is a type of percussion instrument. Because of this, the piano is now typically regarded as both a stringed and percussive instrument.

The table that shows a constant of proportionality of 2 for the ratio of string instruments to percussion instruments is:

String Percussion

2 4

4 8

6 12

Learn more about string instruments visit: brainly.com/question/29844951

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

Which table shows a constant of proportionality of 2 for the ratio of string instruments to percussion instruments?

Answer:

The line of symmetry for the given figure is EF which runs vertically through the center of the arrow. Therefore, the answer is C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  (c)  $37,174.98

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the future value of a quarterly payment of $1500 for 5 years into an account earning 8%, when payments are made at the beginning of the month.

You can use a suitable calculator (or spreadsheet) to find the future value of the series of payments. It will tell you the value is $37,174.98.

Alternatively, you can use the formula for the sum of a geometric sequence, with consideration given to the fact that the last payment earns a full quarter's interest.

  FV = P(1 +r/n)((1 +r/n)^(nt) -1)/(r/n)

  FV = 1500(1 +.08/4)((1.02^(4·5) -1)/(.02) ≈ 37174.976

The future value is $37,174.98.

__

Additional comment

The functions provided by a calculator or spreadsheet allow for payments to be made that the beginning or the end of the period. You need to make sure to select "beginning". That is the default for the calculator shown in the attachment.

250 is the frequency of the Q1 class.

Find the middle score (Q2):

Middle Score (Q2) is calculated as L + [(N/2 - CF) / f] * w

Where

L = lower limit of the middle score class, which equals 30

N is equal to 1,000 students in total.

CF = 450, which is the cumulative frequency of the middle-score class.

300 is the middle score class frequency, or f.

10 is the middle scoring class's width, or w.

Middle Score (Q2) =30 + 1.67 = 31.67

Identify the lower quartile (Q1):

Q1 equals L plus [(N/4 - CF) / f]*w

Where L is the Q1 class's lower border and equals 20

N is equal to 1,000 students in total.

CF = 200, which is the cumulative frequency of the Q1 class before it.

250 is the frequency of the Q1 class.

W = the Q1 class's width, which is 10

Q1 =  20 + 2 = 22

The lower quartile is 22

Establish the upper quartile (Q3):

Q3 is equal to L + [(3N/4 - CF) / f] * w

where L is the lower limit of the Q3 class, and 30

N is equal to 1,000 students in total.

CF = 450, which is the cumulative frequency of the Q3 class.

The upper quartile stands at 450.

Read more about Cumulative Frequency here:

https://brainly.com/question/22659463

#SPJ1

One thousand students took a mathematics examination, which consisted of two papers. Each paper was marked out of 50. Table A gives the distribution of marks for Paper 1, and Table B is the corresponding cumulative frequency table. Find the median, lower quartile (Q1), and upper quartile (Q3) marks for Paper 1.

Table A (Paper 1 Marks Distribution):

Marks Range Frequency

0-9 50

10-19 150

20-29 250

30-39 300

40-49 200

50 50

Table B (Cumulative Frequency):

Marks Range Cumulative Frequency

0-9 50

10-19 200

20-29 450

30-39 750

40-49 950

50 1000

a. i. The circumference of circle A is 128.81 m

ii. The circumference of circle B is 144.53 m

b. The relatonship between the radius and circumference is the same for all circles

The circumference of a circle is the perimeter of the circle.

a.

i. Circumference of circle A

Since circle A has a radius of 21 meters, the circumference is given by C = 2πr where r = radius

So, substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have that

C = 2πr

= 2π × 21 m

= 41π m

= 41 × 3.142

= 128.81 m

ii Circumference of circle B

Since circle A has a radius of 28 meters, the circumference is given by C = 2πr where r = radius

So, substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have that

C = 2πr

= 2π × 28 m

= 46π m

= 46 × 3.142

= 144.53 m

b.

The relatonship between the radius and circumference is the same for all circles since the circumference of a circle is always proportional to its radius.

Learn more about circumference of circle here:

https://brainly.com/question/18571680

#SPJ1

The given hypothesis is that the proportion of people who write with their left hand is equal to 0.24.

Type I error is rejecting a true null hypothesis, while type II error is failing to reject a false null hypothesis.

Option C is a type I error as it rejects the claim that the proportion of people who write with their left hand is 0.24 when the proportion is actually 0.24, which means the null hypothesis is true.

Option D is a type II error as it fails to reject the claim that the proportion of people who write with their left hand is 0.24 when the proportion is actually different from 0.24, which means the null hypothesis is false.

In conclusion, type I error is rejecting a true null hypothesis, and type II error is failing to reject a false null hypothesis in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, we have two types of errors: Type I error and Type II error.

Type I error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the proportion of people who write with their left hand is equal to 0.24. Therefore, a Type I error corresponds to option C: Reject the claim that the proportion of people who write with their left hand is 0.24 when the proportion is actually 0.24.

Type II error occurs when we fail to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the proportion of people who write with their left hand is equal to 0.24. Therefore, a Type II error corresponds to option D: Fail to reject the claim that the proportion of people who write with their left hand is 0.24 when the proportion is actually different from 0.24.

To summarize:
- Type I error: Option C
- Type II error: Option D

Learn more about hypothesis at : brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ11

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is a statement that there is no significant difference between two groups, or that a certain parameter is equal to a specified value. In this case, the null hypothesis is that the mean difference is 0, meaning there is no significant difference between the two groups being compared.

The alternative hypothesis (Ha), on the other hand, is a statement that contradicts the null hypothesis. It can be one-tailed (directional), indicating that the mean difference is greater than or less than 0, or two-tailed (non-directional), indicating that the mean difference is not equal to 0. So, to determine the null and alternative hypotheses in this case, we know that the null hypothesis is that the mean difference is 0. The alternative hypothesis can be either one of the following:
- Ha: The mean difference is not equal to 0 (two-tailed)
- Ha: The mean difference is greater than 0 (one-tailed)
- Ha: The mean difference is less than 0 (one-tailed)

Learn more about hypothesis testing here:

https://brainly.com/question/30588452

#SPJ11

If the null hypothesis were true, the sample correlation would be expected to be near 0, and it is very unlikely to obtain a correlation as strong as -0.67.

a. The sample correlation between self-reported political orientation and support for the legalization of medical marijuana is r = -0.67. This negative correlation indicates that as political orientation becomes more conservative (higher score), support for the legalization of medical marijuana decreases (lower score). The correlation is moderate in size, which means that there is a meaningful relationship between these two variables.

b. The null hypothesis is that there is no correlation between self-reported political orientation and support for the legalization of medical marijuana in the population, symbolized as H0: ρ = 0. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a correlation in the population, symbolized as Ha: ρ ≠ 0.

c. The critical value for a two-tailed test with alpha level α = 0.05 and n = 30-2 = 28 degrees of freedom is ±2.048. The rejection regions are the two tails of the t-distribution with this critical value.

d. The appropriate t-test to answer this question is a two-tailed test of the population correlation coefficient using the formula: t = r√(n-2) / √(1-r^2). Plugging in the values from the sample, we get: t = -3.29.

e. We reject the null hypothesis because the calculated t-value (-3.29) falls outside the rejection region (±2.048). This means that the sample correlation is significantly different from 0, and we have evidence to support the alternative hypothesis that there is a correlation in the population. The p-value associated with the sample correlation is p < 0.01, which means that there is less than a 1% chance of obtaining a correlation as extreme as the one observed in the sample if the null hypothesis is true. This suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis. If the null hypothesis were true, the sample correlation would be expected to be near 0, and it is very unlikely to obtain a correlation as strong as -0.67.

To learn more about hypothesis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11560606

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

that means 2 blue or 2 red or 2 green.

12 marbles in total.

when the first marble is picked, there are only 11 left.

a probability is always the ratio of

desired cases / totally possible cases

the probabilty to pull first a blue marble is

5/12 = 0.416666666...

if that is the case, then the probabilty for the second marble to be blue too is

4/11 = 0.363636363...

(there are only 4 blue marbles in a total of 11 marbles).

and the probabilty for getting 2 blue marbles is

5/12 × 4/11 = 20/132 = 5/33 = 0.151515151...

the probabilty to pull first a red marble is

4/12 = 1/3 = 0.333333333...

if that is the case, then the probabilty for the second marble to be red too is

3/11 = 0.272727272...

(there are only 3 red marbles in a total of 11 marbles).

and the probabilty for getting 2 red marbles is

1/3 × 3/11 = 3/33 = 1/11 = 0.0909090909...

the probabilty to pull first a green marble is

3/12 = 1/4 = 0.25

if that is the case, then the probabilty for the second marble to be green too is

2/11 = 0.181818181...

(there are only 2 green marbles in a total of 11 marbles).

and the probabilty for getting 2 green marbles is

1/4 × 2/11 = 2/44 = 1/22 = 0.045454545...

the probabilty to have any of these 3 mutually exclusive cases (to get a pair of the same color) is the sum of the probabilities :

0.151515151... + 0.09090909... + 0.045454545... =

5/33 + 1/11 + 1/22 = 10/66 + 6/66 + 3/66 = 19/66 =

= 0.287878787...

As per the combination method, out of the 400 students surveyed, 380 students chose red as their favorite color.

To solve this problem, we can set up an equation. An equation is a statement that shows the equality between two expressions. In this case, we can write:

(Number of students who chose red) / (Total number of students) = 95/100

We can simplify 95/100 to 0.95. Multiplying both sides of the equation by 400 (the total number of students), we get:

Number of students who chose red = 0.95 * 400

Simplifying the right-hand side of the equation, we get:

Number of students who chose red = 380

To know more about combination here

https://brainly.com/question/28998705

#SPJ1

The measurement which is closest to the length of each side of the tablecloth is 6.9 feet.

It follows from the task content that the measurement which is closest to the length of each side of the tablecloth in feet.

Total area of the square tablecloth = 48 square feet

Area of a square = Side length²

48 = Side length²

Find the square root of both sides

Side length = √48

= 6.928203230275

Approximately,

Side length = 6.9 feet

Therefore, the side length of the table cloth is 9.6 feet.

Read more on area of a square:

https://brainly.com/question/24487155

#SPJ1

The ordered pair that could be another vertex of the square is (2, 6).

The other vertices of the square must be located either 3 units to the right or 3 units to the left of (5, 3), and either 3 units above or 3 units below (5, 3).

(4, 9) is not 3 units away horizontally or vertically from (5, 3), so it cannot be another vertex of the square.

(6, 3) is 3 units to the right of (5, 3), but it is not 3 units above or below (5, 3), so it cannot be another vertex of the square.

(1, 0) is too far away from (5, 3) to be another vertex of the square.

(2, 6) is 3 units to the left of (5, 3) and 3 units above (5, 3), so it could be another vertex of the square.

Therefore, the ordered pair that could be another vertex of the square is (2, 6).

To learn more about square, click here:

brainly.com/question/14198272

#SPJ11

The parabola has its vertex at (h, k), and the focus is located at (h + p, k). The directrix line is represented by the equation x = h - p.

The equation of a parabola with a given focus and directrix can be derived using the geometric definition of a parabola. Let's consider a parabola with a focus F and a directrix line d. The parabola is defined as the set of all points P such that the distance from P to the focus F is equal to the perpendicular distance from P to the directrix line d. The equation of the parabola can be expressed in terms of either x or y, depending on the orientation of the parabola.

To derive the equation, we can assume that the focus F is located at (h, k + p), where (h, k) represents the vertex of the parabola, and p is the distance from the vertex to the focus. Let's also assume that the directrix line is given by the equation y = k - p.

If we consider a generic point P(x, y) on the parabola, we can calculate the distance between P and the focus F using the distance formula:

√((x - h)² + (y - (k + p))²)

Similarly, we can calculate the perpendicular distance from P to the directrix line d, which is simply the difference in y-coordinates:

|y - (k - p)|

According to the definition of a parabola, these distances should be equal. Therefore, we can set up the equation:

√((x - h)² + (y - (k + p))^2) = |y - (k - p)

To simplify this equation, we square both sides to eliminate the square root:

(x - h)² + (y - (k + p))² = (y - (k - p))²

Expanding and simplifying, we get:

(x - h)² + (y - k - p)² = (y - k + p)²

Further simplifying, we obtain:

(x - h)² = 4p(y - k)

This is the equation of a parabola with its vertex at (h, k) and the focus at (h, k + p). The directrix line is given by the equation y = k - p.

Therefore, the equation of the parabola in x-equals form is:

(x - h)² = 4p(y - k)

Alternatively, if you prefer the y-equals form, you can rearrange the equation as follows:

y = (1/(4p))(x - h)² + k

In this form, the parabola has its vertex at (h, k), and the focus is located at (h + p, k). The directrix line is represented by the equation x = h - p.

Learn more about Parabola:

brainly.com/question/29267743

#SPJ11

Answer:

The quotient of the rational expressions shown below is:

(x²-4-4x+4) / 1

Simplifying the numerator:

(x²-4-4x+4) = (x²-4x) + (4-4) = x(x-4)

Therefore, the quotient is:

x(x-4) / 1 = x(x-4)

Step-by-step explanation:

The response variable Y that is explained by the variation in the explanatory variable X.

The coefficient of determination, denoted by R², is a measure of the proportion of the variance in the response variable Y that can be explained by the linear relationship with the explanatory variable X. In other words, it represents the fraction of the total variation in the response variable that is explained by the regression model.

Mathematically, R² is defined as the ratio of the explained variance to the total variance:

R² = Explained variance / Total variance

The explained variance is the variation in Y that is explained by the linear relationship with X, and is measured as the sum of squares of the residuals from the regression line. The total variance is the sum of squares of deviations of Y from its mean value.

An R² value of 1 indicates a perfect fit of the regression line to the data, with all the variation in Y being explained by the linear relationship with X. An R² value of 0 indicates no linear relationship between X and Y, and the regression line provides no explanatory power.

Thus, the interpretation of R² is that it provides a measure of the goodness of fit of the regression model and indicates the proportion of variation in the response variable Y that is explained by the variation in the explanatory variable X.

To learn more about Mathematically visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15209879

#SPJ11

The value P(t), in dollars, of the bank account is growing according to the equation. The future value of the account at time t=6 is approximately $2,118.96. This is a first-order linear differential equation of the form

DP/dt - 0.05 P = 15 ,I(t) = e(int(-0.05dt)) = e(-0.05t)

Multiplying both sides of the equation by the integral factor gives:

e(-0.05t)DP/dt - 0.05e(-0.05t)P = 15e(-0.05t)

Using the product rule, the left-hand side can be written as

d/dt(e(-0.05t) P) = 15e(-0.05t)

e(-0.05t) P = -300e(-0.05t) + C

where C is the constant of integration. You can solve C using the initial condition P(0) = $1,300.

e0 * 1300 = -300e0 + C

C=1600

e(-0.05t) P = -300e(-0.05t) + 1600

P(t) = -300 + 1600e(0.05t) .To find the future value of the account at time t=6, substitute t=6 into the formula.

P(6) = -300 + 1600e(0.05*6)

P(6) ≒ $2,118.96

Thus, the future value of the account at time t=6 is approximately $2,118.96. 

To learn about first-order linear differential equations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30645878

Complete question: The value P(t), in dollars, of the bank account is growing. According to the equation DP/dt - 0. 05P = 15,  If an initial amount of P(0) = $1,300 is deposited to the account, then the future value of this account at time t = 6 is approximately?

#SPJ4

The clusters are not predefined but rather generated by the algorithm based on the data provided.

Answer:

Cluster analysis is an example of Unsupervised Learning.

In unsupervised learning, the algorithm is given a dataset without any predefined labels or categories, and it is tasked with discovering patterns and relationships within the data on its own. Cluster analysis is one of the most commonly used techniques in unsupervised learning, where the algorithm is used to group similar records together into clusters based on their similarities.

The statement "Cluster analysis aims to group similar records into predefined clusters" is false.

Cluster analysis is used to group similar records together based on their similarities, but the clusters themselves are not predefined. In other words, the algorithm discovers the clusters on its own based on the characteristics of the data. Therefore, the clusters are not predefined but rather generated by the algorithm based on the data provided.

To learn more about themselves visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9168553

#SPJ11

Answer:

87 feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the problem, we can use the tangent function, which relates the opposite side of a right triangle (the height of the tree in this case) to the adjacent side (the horizontal distance from the base of the tree to the point directly below the kite) through the angle between them (44 degrees):

tan(44) = height / distance

We know the angle and the distance (90 feet), so we can solve for the height:

height = distance * tan(44)

height = 90 * tan(44)

The value of tan(44) is approximately 0.9656887, which means that if we multiply it by 90, we get:

90 * tan(44) = 90 * 0.9656887

Using a calculator, we get:

90 * 0.9656887 = 86.908983

However, this is not the final answer, because we were asked to round to the nearest whole foot. Since 86.908983 is closer to 87 than to 86, we round up to 87. Therefore, the approximate height of the tree is 87 feet.

The product of the terms   [tex](d - 9)[/tex]  and  [tex](2d^{2} + 11d -4)[/tex]  will be [tex](2d^{3} - 7d^{2} - 103d + 36)[/tex].

We have to find the product of two terms.

First term = (d - 9)

Second term = [tex](2d^{2} + 11d -4)[/tex]

To find the product of these two terms, we will be using the distributive property. According to the distributive property, when we multiply the sum of two or more addends by a number, it will give the same result as when we multiply each addend individually by the number and then add the products together.

We have to find :  [tex](d - 9) (2d^2 + 11d -4)[/tex]

Using the distributive property,

[tex]d * 2d^{2} + d * 11 + d * (-4) - 9 * 2d^2 - 9 * 11d - 9 * (-4)[/tex]

After further multiplication, we get

[tex]2d^{3} + 11d^2 - 4d - 18d^{2} - 99d + 36[/tex]

Now, combine all the like terms.

[tex]2d^{3} + 11d^{2} - 18d^{2} - 4d - 99d + 36[/tex]

[tex]2d^{3} - 7d^{2} - 103d + 36[/tex]

Therefore, the product of d-9 and 2d^2 + 11d -4 is [tex]2d^{3} - 7d^{2} - 103d + 36[/tex]

To learn more about the product and distributive property;

https://brainly.com/question/2807928

#SPJ4

The value of sin C in the right triangle is 0.6.

A right triangle is a triangle that has one of its angles as 90 degrees. The sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees.

Therefore, let's find the value of sin C in the right triangle as follows:

sin C = opposite / hypotenuse side

opposite side = 12 units

Hypotenuse side = 20 units

Therefore,

sin C = 12 / 20

sin C = 3 / 5

Finally,

sin C = 0.6

learn more on right triangle here: https://brainly.com/question/28523734

#SPJ1

Answer:

If the first digit cannot be 8, there are 9 choices for the first digit (any digit from 1 to 9).

(a) If only odd digits are used, there are 5 choices for each of the remaining 6 digits (1, 3, 5, 7, or 9). Therefore, the total number of possible 7-digit telephone numbers with only odd digits is:

9 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5 = 59,531,250

So there are 59,531,250 possible 7-digit telephone numbers if the first digit cannot be 8 and only odd digits are used.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 50,000 possible 7-digit telephone number using only odd digits and with the first digit not being 8.

To determine the number of possible 7-digit telephone numbers using only odd digits and with the first digit not being 8, let's consider the following:

Odd digits: 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9
Number of odd digits: 5

a) Only odd digits are used:
For the first digit, there are 4 choices (1, 3, 5, and 7) since it cannot be 8. For the remaining 6 digits, we have 5 choices each (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9) since they can be any odd digit.

Step 1: First digit - 4 choices
Step 2: Second digit - 5 choices
Step 3: Third digit - 5 choices
Step 4: Fourth digit - 5 choices
Step 5: Fifth digit - 5 choices
Step 6: Sixth digit - 5 choices
Step 7: Seventh digit - 5 choices

To find the total number of possible 7-digit telephone numbers, multiply the number of choices for each digit together:

Total possibilities = 4 × 5 × 5 × 5 × 5 × 5 × 5 = 4 × 5^6 = 50,000

So, there are 50,000 possible 7-digit telephone numbers using only odd digits and with the first digit not being 8.

Learn more about number here:

brainly.com/question/16195818

#SPJ11

The average total cost when Q=1000 is approximately 1003.

To find the average total cost when Q=1000 and given the total cost function TC = 100 + aQ + bQ² with a = 3 and b = 1, follow these steps:

1. Plug in the values of a, b, and Q into the total cost function:
TC = 100 + 3(1000) + 1(1000)²

2. Calculate the total cost:
TC = 100 + 3000 + 1000000 = 1003100

3. Calculate the average total cost by dividing the total cost by the quantity (Q):
Average Total Cost (ATC) = TC / Q = 1003100 / 1000 = 1003.1

4. Round the average total cost to the nearest integer:
ATC ≈ 1003

So, the average total cost when Q=1000 is approximately 1003.

total cost functionhttps://brainly.com/question/16177487

#SPJ11

The 90% confidence interval for the true proportion of students who had part-time jobs is from 0.374 to 0.526.

We have,
1. First, calculate the sample proportion (p) by dividing the number of students with part-time jobs (207) by the total number of students surveyed (460): p = 207/460 ≈ 0.450

2. Calculate the standard error (SE) using the formula SE = √(p (1 - p)/n), where n is the sample size:

SE ≈ √(0.450(1 - 0.450)/460) ≈ 0.046

3. Find the critical value (z) for a 90% confidence interval, which is 1.645.

4. Calculate the margin of error (ME) using the formula ME = z x SE:

ME ≈ 1.645 x 0.046 ≈ 0.076

5. Find the lower and upper limits of the confidence interval by adding and subtracting the margin of error from the sample proportion:

Lower limit ≈ 0.450 - 0.076 ≈ 0.374,

Upper limit ≈ 0.450 + 0.076 ≈ 0.526

Thus,
The 90% confidence interval for the true proportion of students who had part-time jobs is from 0.374 to 0.526.

Learn more about confidence intervals here:

https://brainly.com/question/17212516

#SPJ11

The amount in the account after 12 years is approximately $466,197.. The amount of interest earned over 12 years is approximately $139,725.

We can use the formula for the future value of an annuity to calculate the amount in the account after 12 years:

FV = PMT * ((1 + r/12)^n - 1) / (r/12)

where PMT is the monthly deposit, r is the annual interest rate (as a decimal), n is the total number of payments, and FV is the future value of the annuity.

In this case, we have:

PMT = $2,449

r = 0.048

n = 12 * 12 = 144

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

FV = $2,449 * ((1 + 0.048/12)^144 - 1) / (0.048/12)

FV ≈ $466,197

Therefore, the amount in the account after 12 years is approximately $466,197.

To calculate the amount of interest earned, we can subtract the total amount of deposits over 12 years from the total amount in the account:

Interest = FV - (PMT * n)

Interest = $466,197 - ($2,449 * 144)

Interest ≈ $139,725

Therefore, the amount of interest earned over 12 years is approximately $139,725.

To learn more about payments visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15136793

#SPJ11