The source above describes the philosophy of the Renaissance called are Humanism.
What is philosophy?Philosophy is the study of fundamental questions about the nature of reality, knowledge, and humanity. It is a field of inquiry that explores the meaning of life, the pursuit of truth, and the nature of reality. Philosophy is a way of thinking, questioning, and analyzing the world around us in order to arrive at a deeper understanding of the universe and our place in it. It is an interdisciplinary subject that can be applied to many other areas of study, such as ethics, theology, metaphysics, epistemology, and the history of thought. Philosophy seeks to understand the world and our place in it, as well as how we can live in harmony with it. It is a form of wisdom that can help us make sense of the complexities of the world and our lives.
To learn more about philosophy
https://brainly.com/question/16999698
#SPJ1
Describe how a capitalist, socialist, and communist would each respond to the idea of a company paying unfairly low wages:
PLEASE HELP!!!! will mark BRAINLIEST!!!
Answer:
Capitalist:
A capitalist would likely argue that the company has the right to pay whatever wages it sees fit, based on the principles of supply and demand. They may argue that if workers are unhappy with their wages, they are free to seek employment elsewhere, or they could improve their skills to become more valuable to the company. A capitalist may also argue that if the company pays wages that are too low, it may have trouble attracting and retaining workers, which could hurt its profitability in the long run.
Socialist:
A socialist would likely argue that the government should intervene to ensure that workers are paid a fair wage. They may argue that workers have a right to a living wage and that companies have a responsibility to provide it. A socialist may also argue that if companies are allowed to pay unfairly low wages, it could lead to social unrest and inequality. They may advocate for the government to set minimum wage laws or to establish policies that promote collective bargaining to ensure that workers have a voice in setting wages.
Communist:
A communist would likely argue that the problem of unfairly low wages is inherent in capitalism, which they see as a system that benefits the owners of capital at the expense of workers. They may argue that the only way to solve the problem is to abolish capitalism and establish a system where the means of production are collectively owned and controlled. In a communist system, workers would be paid according to their contribution to society, and there would be no exploitation of labor. They may see the problem of unfairly low wages as symptomatic of a broader issue of inequality and exploitation in capitalist societies.
Answer:
A capitalist would argue that the market should determine wages, and that if a company is paying unfairly low wages, workers are free to seek employment elsewhere. They would argue that the company is simply responding to market forces and trying to maximize profits, which is the goal of any business in a capitalist system.
A socialist would argue that workers have a right to fair wages and that the government should intervene to ensure that companies are paying their workers fairly. They would argue that the company is exploiting its workers and that this is a symptom of a larger problem with capitalism, which prioritizes profits over people.
A communist would argue that the entire concept of wages is inherently unfair and that workers should be paid according to their needs, not their labor. They would argue that the company is exploiting its workers and that this is a symptom of a larger problem with capitalism, which they believe is inherently exploitative. They would advocate for the abolition of private property and the establishment of a classless society in which everyone is equal.
the Industrialized North cause and effect
The Industrialized North refers to the region of the United States that experienced rapid industrialization and urbanization during the 19th century. This transformation had a significant impact on the country as a whole, with far-reaching social, economic, and political consequences.
Cause: The availability of natural resources and transportation infrastructure allowed for industrial growth in the North.
Effect: This led to the creation of new manufacturing centers, such as textile mills, iron foundries, and steel mills, which provided jobs and drew workers from rural areas.
Cause: The development of new technologies, such as the steam engine and the telegraph, made production more efficient and communication faster.
Effect: This facilitated the growth of industries and made it easier for businesses to operate across long distances.
Cause: The increase in industrial production led to the growth of urban areas, as workers migrated to cities in search of employment opportunities.
Effect: This created a new social and economic order, with the emergence of a new middle class and the formation of labor unions and other worker organizations.
Cause: The North's industrial growth created new economic opportunities for the United States, with new markets opening up for domestic goods and exports.
Effect: This helped to establish the United States as a major economic power on the world stage and contributed to the growth of capitalism as a dominant economic system.
:
Answer: Northern industrialization expanded rapidly following the War of 1812. Industrialized manufacturing began in New England, where wealthy merchants built water-powered textile mills (and mill towns to support them) along the rivers of the Northeast.
Industrialization can be driven by a combination of factors including the government policy, labor-saving inventions, entrepreneurial ambitions, and a demand for goods and services. It has profound implications for the population, causing a wave of migration from small farms to cities and towns where jobs can be found.
Congress and Foreign Policy
9. Draw Inferences Read the first paragraph of "Congress and Foreign Policy."
How might the foreign policy of the United States be different if the Constitution
had not forbidden the individual States from making treaties or alliances with
foreign powers?
Answer:
The United States' foreign policy would probably be more disjointed and less cohesive if the Constitution had allowed individual states to enter into treaties or alliances with other countries. Each state would be free to pursue its own foreign policy goals, which might result in rival alliances and agreements with other countries. Due to its lack of an united foreign policy strategy, this could leave the United States in a weaker and less significant position on the global arena. Because different states could have different interests and agendas when it comes to foreign affairs, it might also potentially result in more instability and conflict within the nation.:
The foreign policy of the United States would be different if individual states were allowed to make treaties or alliances with foreign powers. It could lead to conflicting interests and diplomatic disputes.
The foreign policy of the United States would be different if the Constitution had not forbidden the individual states from making treaties or alliances with foreign powers. Without this restriction, individual states might pursue their own foreign policy agenda, leading to a lack of unified and cohesive national foreign policy. This could result in conflicting alliances, diplomatic disputes, and possibly even international conflicts.
For example, imagine if one state decided to ally with a country that the federal government deemed as a threat. This could strain diplomatic relations between the United States and that particular country. It could also create tensions within the country itself, as different states might have conflicting alliances and interests.
Overall, the Constitution's prohibition on states making treaties or alliances with foreign powers helps to establish a unified foreign policy for the United States, ensuring that national interests and objectives are prioritized over state-level interests.
Learn more about Congress and Foreign Policy here:https://brainly.com/question/34378108
#SPJ2
Which ideology supports directs rule of state by one powerful leader?
confucianism is a belief system that focuses on
Click and drag each answer choice to its correct place in the passage about the end of the Civil War. Not all choices will be used.
As the Civil War came to an end in 1865, President Abraham Lincoln wanted to see the country heal quickly from the four years of fighting. His proposal
to bring the South back into the country became known as "
Reconstruction." He wanted all former Confederate states to be
admitted back into the Union after
of the population promised loyalty to the United States. Also, the states would have to
agree to abolish
However, he did not live to see that happen. Instead, Reconstruction was controlled by Congress. Their plan was known as "Congressional
Reconstruction, but sometimes it is referred to as
Reconstruction, Politicians such as
Charles Sumner wanted to punish the South for starting the war. Though they required states to pass amendments 13th, 14th, and 15th, they also place
the South under military rule. Southern states were also required to end all
laws that denied basic rights to former slaves.
Reconstruction would end in 1877, but the wounds of the previous years would be a long time healing.
:: Black Codes :: Presidential Thaddeus Stevens : 50%
and
:: Radical :: 10%
:: Andrew Johnson #: slavery
Next >
Answer:how do i drag
Explanation:?
How did McCarthyism affect American society?
It increased church attendance.
It caused many Americans to refuse to give up any civil liberties.
It kept the FBI from monitoring the activities of Americans.
It led to more people being allowed to attend Communist Party meetings.
Answer:It kept the FBI from monitoring the activities of Americans.
Explanation: 5 minutes of my surfing the web and the process of elimination-- trust me on this (:
Both Ancient Athens and Rome had a form of democracy we could recognize today. In a five paragraph essay, describe the forms of democracy present
in both, and analyze how they may have influenced modern American democracy. Be sure to include the benefits and possible drawbacks present in
each system.
40 points! :)
Top awnser gets brainliest!
Ancient Athens and Rome both had a form of democracy that served as the foundation for modern American democracy. Athens was known for its direct or pure democracy, where citizens gathered in an assembly to vote on laws and policies.
Democracy in Ancient Athens and Rome -All male citizens over the age of 18 were allowed to participate, and decisions were made based on a majority vote. On the other hand, Rome practiced a representative democracy, where citizens elected representatives to make decisions on their behalf. The Roman Republic was comprised of two consuls and a senate, and decisions were made through a system of checks and balances.
One of the benefits of the Athenian democracy was that it allowed for greater citizen participation in government. Citizens had a direct say in the laws and policies that affected their daily lives, and this helped to foster a sense of community and shared responsibility.
However, the Athenian democracy was limited to male citizens only, and women, slaves, and foreigners were excluded from participation. This exclusion undermined the democratic ideal of equal rights and representation for all citizens.
Similarly, the Roman Republic allowed for greater citizen participation through the election of representatives. This system helped to ensure that government decisions were made by individuals with experience and expertise in the relevant areas.
However, the Roman Republic was also limited to a small group of wealthy citizens, and the poor and marginalized were often excluded from the political process. In addition, the system of checks and balances that was meant to prevent abuse of power was sometimes undermined by corruption and political maneuvering.
To know more about Ancient Athens and Rome -
https://brainly.com/question/17686059
#SPJ1
If you want to evaluate a U.S. policy's likelihood of promoting the spread of democracy around the world, what step is most important?
A. Identify the solution the policy proposed to a problem.
B. Identify the problem the policy is supposed to address.
C. Identify the impact of the policy on Americans' lives.
D.Identify the ideals expressed by the policy's goals
D. Identify the ideals expressed by the policy's goals is the most important step to evaluate a U.S. policy's likelihood of promoting the spread of democracy around the world. The promotion of democracy is often one of the key goals of U.S. foreign policy. By identifying the ideals expressed by the policy's goals, it can be determined how strongly the U.S. is committed to promoting democracy in a particular region or country. Additionally, it can help to identify whether the policy is likely to be successful in promoting democracy or whether it may have unintended consequences that could undermine democracy promotion efforts.
If you borrow $800 at 18% for 11 month, how much total intrest will you pay
Answer: The total interest paid on borrowing $800 at 18% for 11 months is $1,584.
Explanation:
To calculate the total interest paid, we need to multiply the principal amount borrowed by the interest rate and the time for which it is borrowed. Here, the principal amount is $800, the interest rate is 18%, and the time is 11 months.
The formula to calculate the simple interest is:
Simple Interest = (Principal x Rate x Time) / 100
Substituting the values in the formula, we get:
Simple Interest = (800 x 18 x 11) / 100
Simple Interest = 1584
Therefore, the total interest paid on borrowing $800 at 18% for 11 months is $1,584.
1,584.00$ in interest well be payed after ll months I believe 2,384.00$ if you add in the 800$ originally
Pick a word Lincoln used repeatedly in the Gettysburg address explain why he repeated it and what it added to the speech
Lincoln's use of the word "dedicated" several times helped to emphasize his message of duty, sacrifice, and dedication. It also served to highlight the significance of the Gettysburg Address as a representation of the American people's dedication to democracy and freedom.
Lincoln emphasised the serious purpose of the battlefield by repeating "dedicated," which was to devote it as a place of final rest for those who had sacrificed their lives for their nation. He emphasized the fact that the Union soldiers who had fought and perished at Gettysburg had done so out of a sense of duty and commitment to upholding the Union, and that their sacrifices would not be forgotten.
Lincoln was also underlining the concept that the American people's commitment to the values of democracy and freedom was being put to the test by the Civil War by using the word "committed" numerous times. In order to ensure that the sacrifices made by those who had battled and died at Gettysburg were not in vain, he was urging his audience to recommit themselves to the cause of upholding these principles.
To know more about Gettysburg Address
brainly.com/question/3062126
#SPJ4
How did the posting of the “twelve theses” by students reflect Nazi policy?
by demanding education rights for German students
by supporting only German professors
by condemning communist activities
by limiting the rights of women
B) by supporting only German professors, the "twelve theses" posted by students reflect Nazi policy.
What is Nazi policy?The initial goal of Nazi racial policies was to exclude Jews from important white-collar jobs. The Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service abolished non-Aryan employment in government positions in April 1933. Jews were unable to serve as judges, physicians in state-run hospitals, lawyers in government departments, or educators in public schools as a result of this.
President Hindenburg opposed this law because he was concerned about how Jewish World War I veterans were treated. The law was later changed by Hitler to get Hindenburg's approval.
To learn more about Nazi visit :
https://brainly.com/question/2515107
#SPJ1
who was declared president of the philippines in 1986 following the protests of the people power revolution
Corazon Aquino became the President of the Philippines in 1986 following the People Power Revolution which ended Ferdinand Marcos' regime.
Explanation:In 1986, after the People Power Revolution in the Philippines, Corazon Aquino was declared the president. This historic event marked the end of President Ferdinand E. Marcos' regime. The People Power Revolution was a non-violent, civilian-led demonstration against Marcos' regime. It is also considered a testament to the power of democracy and the will of the Filipino people. As the president, Aquino faced many challenges including several coup attempts, economic problems, and natural disasters. Despite these, she implemented economic reform policies and paved the way for a democratic constitution in the Philippines.
Learn more about Corazon Aquino here:https://brainly.com/question/26249227
#SPJ2
Question 2 of 10
After the war, Germany was forced to pay reparations in the form of:
O A. money, land, industrial assets, and scientific knowledge.
OB. territories and hundreds of millions of dollars in cash.
OC. tens of millions of dollars for mistreated prisoners of war.
D. money, territories, and advanced weaponry knowledge.
SUBMIT
Answer: A. money, land, industrial assets, and scientific knowledge.
Explanation: After World War I, Germany was indeed forced to pay reparations for the damages caused during the war. The reparations were not limited to a single form but encompassed various aspects. Germany was required to pay a significant amount of money as reparations to the Allied Powers. This included both direct payments and payments in the form of goods and resources.
Furthermore, Germany was also forced to cede territories to neighboring countries as part of the reparations. These territories included areas such as Alsace-Lorraine, Eupen-Malmedy, and parts of Upper Silesia.
Additionally, Germany had to give up some of its industrial assets and resources to the victorious countries. This included machinery, equipment, and other valuable resources that were seen as compensation for the damages caused.
Lastly, Germany was also required to share its scientific knowledge with the Allied Powers. This included technological advancements, research findings, and other forms of scientific knowledge that were deemed valuable.
Learn more about reparations here: https://brainly.com/question/16614411?.
This battle was won by the British.
A. Cowpens
B. Guilford Courthouse
C. Yorktown
The Americans were helped by the French here?
B. Guilford Courthouse
[tex] \: \: \: \: [/tex]
Continental Army soldiers defended the final position at the Battle of Guilford Courthouse covering the retreat of the American militia and dealing the British a costly victory. Courtesy United States Army Center of Military History.
please will someone to use all these documents in this website and make a first person journal entry of the great migration minimum 5 paragraphs cite everything please help me here.
It is important to understand that the event "great migration" was when large number of African-American families moved from the south to the North in search of jobs and less terrorist attacks on their families so as to gain a sense freedom from overt oppression.
First person journal entry of the Great Migration:Dear Journal,
Today marks the first day of our journey as we leave the South for the North. It's hard to leave the place I called home for so long, but I know it's for the best. I am one of many African Americans who have decided to leave the South due to the racial discrimination and lack of opportunities. The Great Migration is not an easy journey, but we are all hopeful for a better future.
The train ride has been long and uncomfortable, but we finally made it to our destination in Chicago. It's a big change from the small town in Georgia that I grew up in, but I'm excited to start this new chapter of my life. I've heard that there are more job opportunities and better living conditions in the North, but I know it won't be easy. It's hard to leave behind everything I know, but I'm willing to work hard and make a new life for myself. I hope that this journey will be worth it in the end.
Read more about great migration
brainly.com/question/21201
#SPJ1
13. Which of the following accurately describes the Greek Dark Ages?
A. It lasted from 800 BC to 400 AD.
B. It was time of decline, famine, and population decrease.
C. The Mycenaean civilization remained in power.
D. It marked the start of the Greek Archaic Period.
Answer:
B. It was time of decline, famine, and population decrease.
The Greek Dark Ages is a period in Greek history that lasted from around 1100 BC to 800 BC. It followed the collapse of the Mycenaean civilization and was marked by a decline in population, trade, and cultural achievements. It was a time of poverty and hardship, characterized by a lack of written records and archaeological evidence. The Greek Dark Ages came to an end with the rise of the Greek city-states and the beginning of the Greek Archaic Period.
Which statement is accurate about business owners in California during the gold rush?
A. They provided products for miners at fair prices.
B. Many became wealthier than miners because they sold items at inflated prices.
C. They were unable to keep up with the demand from miners.
D. They lost money during the gold rush because they sold items at such cheap prices.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
1. Briefly explain the various African American movements to migrate from the South. What
were African Americans motivated by? Who were the major leaders, and where did they
want African Americans to resettle?
It has to be a paragraph
Answer:
The driving force behind the movement was to escape racial violence purse economic, educational opportunities and freedom from oppression of home Crow
com/public/activity/5004002/assessment
O
5.4.2 Test (CST): Citizen Connections
Question 11 of 20
Which category is not one of the major responsibilities of state government?
A. Education
B. Public aid
C. Libraries
D. Corrections
SUBMIT
All of the options listed (Education, Public aid, Libraries, and Corrections) are major responsibilities of state governments. Therefore, there is no option that is not one of the major responsibilities of state government.
State governments are responsible for a wide range of functions and services, including but not limited to:
Education: State governments are responsible for providing and funding public K-12 schools, as well as overseeing higher education institutions within their state.
Public aid: State governments provide a range of public assistance programs, such as Medicaid, food stamps, and cash assistance for low-income families.
Libraries: State governments may fund and operate public libraries within their state.
Corrections: State governments are responsible for maintaining and operating correctional facilities, such as prisons and jails, and overseeing probation and parole programs for those who have been convicted of crimes.
These functions are just a few examples of the many responsibilities that state governments have in providing services to their citizens.
What do the systematic reading, topical, and comparison methods of studying Proverbs require?
Answer:
Pray for Focus: there is a lot of information packed into very few words. ...
Ponder: Let the proverb linger: don't rush; pray that God will speak to you through his Holy Spirit in allowing you to ponder, to breathe in important nuggets for you in your life.
Explanation:
Answer: The systematic reading method of studying Proverbs involves reading the book in its entirety and examining each individual proverb, while the topical method involves categorizing the proverbs according to specific themes or topics. The comparison method involves comparing and contrasting similar or contrasting proverbs to gain a deeper understanding of their meaning. All three methods require careful observation and analysis of the language and context of the proverbs in order to understand their intended message and practical application.
Your welcome and bralinest is much appreciated. (:
Explanation:
What was a direct result of African Americans gaining political power?
Answer:pooop
Explanation:
Poop is brown, african americans are brown.
Paleontologists are studying a specific type of fossil from an organism found in the bottom rock layer of a cliff. Later they notice the same type of fossil in a higher layer on the same cliff. The rock layers are undisturbed – no folding or faulting has taken place. Which of the following is the BEST explanation for why fossils of this organism can be found in multiple rock layers in this cliff?
A. This particular type of organism lived for a long period of time in the same area
B. The cliff has many faults that have broken down the rocks and moved the fossils
C. This particular type of organism was present in multiple locations on Earth
D. The cliff has many folds that moved the fossils into different layers
Please explain why you chose this answer?
The numerous folds in the cliff shifted the fossils into various levels.
What fossilised remains are utilised to investigate rock layers?Index fossils are fossil species that are used to identify one strata from another. Index fossils only appear for a brief period of time. Typically, index fossils are widespread, easily recognised, and common fossil species.
What three forms of palaeontology are there?Study of invertebrate animal fossils, such as mollusks, echinoderms, and others, is known as invertebrate palaeontology. Vertebrate palaeontology is the study of fossilised vertebrates, ranging from early fish to modern mammals. Paleoanthropology (human): The study of ancient human and protohuman fossils.
To know more about folds visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/25975708
#SPJ1
What obstacles or problems would have to be dealt with for D’Arcy’s vision to become a reality?
How did war mobilization affect the housing market in the United States?
OA. War mobilization shut down much of the housing market and led
to housing shortages.
B. War mobilization helped the housing market because there was an
increase in supplies used to build houses.
O C. War mobilization led to the growth of the housing market as more
people were able to afford homes.
OD. War mobilization didn't affect the housing market as many
industries continued normal production during the war.
SUBMIT
Answer:
A is the right answer. The war shut down a lot of the housing market, which made it hard to find a place to live.
Explanation:
During World War II, the U.S. government did a number of things to get the economy ready for war. These included rationing key materials, putting limits on construction that wasn't necessary, and turning factories into wartime factories. The housing market changed a lot because of these policies.
Rationing of steel, copper, and lumber made it hard to build new homes, and rules about building things that weren't necessary cut down on the number of new homes that could be built. Also, turning factories into wartime industries cut down on the supply of building materials and increased the need for housing as people moved to cities to work in wartime industries.
Because of this, there was a big lack of housing during the war, especially in cities. This shortage led to overcrowding, living conditions that weren't up to par, and more competition for the few homes that were available. In response, the government came up with a number of plans to deal with the lack of housing, such as building temporary housing for war workers and making public housing programs bigger.
Option B is wrong because there weren't as many new homes being built because there weren't enough building materials because of the war. Choice C is wrong because, even though the expansion of public housing programs gave more people access to affordable housing, the housing market as a whole was marked by shortages and limits. Choice D is wrong because, as explained above, the war mobilization policies did have a big effect on the housing market.
Between what years did the Holocaust occur?
Answer:1933-1945
Explanation:
Explain to what extent Mobutu Sese seko’s policies influenced the economic development of the Congo between 1960 and 1970
Answer:
Mobutu Sese Seko was the President of the Democratic Republic of Congo, formerly known as Zaire, from 1965 to 1997. His policies had a significant impact on the economic development of the country during the 1960s and 1970s.
In the early years of his presidency, Mobutu nationalized the mining industry, which had previously been controlled by foreign companies. This move allowed the government to take control of the country's natural resources and use the profits to invest in infrastructure and development projects. The nationalization policy was successful in generating revenue for the government, and by 1970, the Congo was one of the largest producers of copper and cobalt in the world.
Another key policy of Mobutu's was his focus on Africanization, which aimed to promote African values and traditions in the country. This included the promotion of local businesses and industries, which were seen as a way to reduce the country's dependence on foreign aid and investment. As a result, Mobutu introduced policies that encouraged the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises, which helped to create jobs and stimulate economic growth.
However, despite these positive developments, Mobutu's policies were also characterized by corruption and mismanagement. The nationalization of the mining industry, for example, led to the creation of state-owned companies that were rife with corruption and inefficiency. In addition, Mobutu's focus on Africanization often meant that he ignored the need for skilled foreign workers and expertise, which limited the country's ability to modernize and compete in the global economy.
Overall, Mobutu's policies had both positive and negative impacts on the economic development of the Congo between 1960 and 1970. While they helped to promote local businesses and generate revenue from natural resources, corruption and mismanagement undermined the long-term sustainability of these policies. Additionally, Mobutu's focus on Africanization often came at the expense of modernization and innovation, which limited the country's ability to compete globally.
What is one lasting "invention" in the US by German immigrants?
Answer:
One lasting "invention" in the US by German immigrants is the Christmas tree tradition. German immigrants introduced the tradition of decorating evergreen trees during the Christmas season in the 18th century, and it became popular throughout the United States in the 19th century.
Explanation:
Note one reason the United States backed military rule in Guatemala
It prompted the U.S. to give the Guatemalan government substantial military and financial support while it was under military authority.
The reason United States backed military rule in GuatemalaOne reason the United States backed military rule in Guatemala was to protect American business interests, particularly the United Fruit Company.
The company had significant investments in Guatemala, and the military government was seen as more favorable to American business interests than the democratically elected government that it replaced. The U.S. government also saw the military government as a bulwark against communism in the region.
This prompted the U.S. to give the Guatemalan government substantial military and financial support while it was under military authority.
Learn more on military rule in Guatemala here: https://brainly.com/question/11618721
#SPJ1
T/F. Although evangelical preachers railed against the greed by promoting industry, sobriety, and self-discipline as examples of moral behavior, they encouraged the same qualities necessary for success in the market culture.
The given statement "Although evangelical preachers railed against the greed by promoting industry, sobriety, and self-discipline as examples of moral behavior, they encouraged the same qualities necessary for success in the market culture" is True.
This is because the qualities that they promoted, such as industry, sobriety, and self-discipline, are important for success in the market culture. These qualities help individuals to be productive, responsible, and disciplined, which are necessary for success in the competitive market culture.
Therefore, while the preachers may have been critical of greed, they encouraged the same qualities that are necessary for success in the market culture.
To know more about market culture refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28900428#
#SPJ11