What is the purpose of this article?
Answer:
To inform, hope this helps.
Why did Twinkle seem to really like the items left behind by the previous owners?
Answer:
you need to put more detail into your question
Explanation:
Answer: She enjoyed finding the items around the house and felt as if they were a blessing for their home.
Explanation:
She, in the story, says that when she is cooking she feels as if the meal is made great because of these items blessing her and Sanjeev.
which term best fits the following sentence? you are being in a summary when you have given the facts, details, and plot points without showing your opinion. (1 point) responses chronological chronological transitional transitional subjective subjective objective
The term that best fits the following sentence: "You are being objective in a summary when you have given the facts, details, and plot points without showing your opinion" is Objective.
A summary is a short, condensed version of a larger document, such as an article, essay, or research paper. Summaries can range in length from a couple of paragraphs to several pages depending on the length of the original work.
Summary writing entails condensing the primary points or themes of a larger document into a brief, easy-to-read format that provides readers with an overview of the work's primary arguments or topics.
Objectivity is a term that refers to the quality of being impartial or unbiased. Objective summaries provide the reader with an impartial and accurate overview of the original text's primary themes, ideas, or points. Objective writing avoids the use of personal pronouns or opinion language to present information in a neutral manner.
Instead of subjective language, objective writing employs factual and descriptive phrases, as well as third-person point of view, to give an impartial representation of the work's main topics or themes. Therefore, the term that best fits the following sentence is Objective.
For more such questions on summary, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27029716
#SPJ11
How are jurors 9 and 2 in “12 angry men”
Music is the rhythm of the soul oral
Answer: true
Explanation:
Read these lines from the poem.
Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?
These lines allude to God or a creator.
How does this allusion affect the meaning of the poem?
The speaker wonders whether the creator who made
the lamb would make the tiger.
o The allusion reveals the speaker's resentment
regarding religious beliefs and rituals,
The allusion suggests that the speaker values the
lamb more than he values the tiger.
The speaker prays to his creator in the hope that
someone will rescue him.
His allusion affects the meaning of the poem as A. The speaker wonders whether the creator who made the lamb would make the tiger.
What is the allusion about?The allusion to God or a creator in the lines "Did He smile His work to see? / Did He who made the lamb make thee?" suggests that the poem is contemplating the idea of divine creation and questioning why a benevolent creator would also create something as fierce and dangerous as the tiger. This allusion emphasizes the speaker's sense of wonder and awe at the power and mystery of creation.
Therefore, the correct interpretation is that the allusion suggests that the speaker values the lamb more than he values the tiger. It emphasizes the contrast between the gentle and innocent nature of the lamb and the ferocity and power of the tiger, and prompts the speaker to reflect on the paradoxical nature of creation.
Learn more about allusion on;
https://brainly.com/question/11507587
#SPJ1
What does the highlighted stage direction most likely show?
Answer: Action and movement the primary purpose of stage directions is to describe what a character is doing—plus how and where they are doing it—between lines of dialogue. ...
Costumes Stage directions may also explain what a character looks like. ...
Lighting, sound, and setting These elements establish the physical and aural details of a scene. ...
Emotion ...
Explanation: Stage directions can sometimes also include instructions about the technical aspects of production like lighting, sound, costume, scenery, and props. They’re vital in suggesting the relationship between two characters inside a text. Movements can add tension and emotion to the proceedings, thus assuring that the audiences engage with a character.
tales suggests but does not come out and say that joe dimaggio and marilyn monroe were competitive about their celebrity. how does talese use monroe's mythical status to develop his portrait of dimaggio?
Talese uses Monroe's mythical status to develop his portrait of DiMaggio by showing how the two were locked in a perpetual comparison.
Throughout the essay, Talese paints a picture of DiMaggio as a man ever aware of Monroe's fame and feeling the need to compete with it. He was keenly aware of the public's fascination with her, and felt that it overshadowed his own accomplishments.
This is illustrated in the fact that he refused to be photographed with her, as well as in how he refused to be seen in public with her. Talese also describes how DiMaggio was jealous of Monroe's popularity and felt compelled to measure up to her in the public eye.
Talese uses Monroe's mythical status to paint a picture of a man who is consumed by the competition between them, struggling to keep pace with Monroe's fame and yet never quite managing to do so.
To learn more about mythical status link is here
brainly.com/question/30702892
#SPJ4
The given question is incomplete so the complete question is:
Talese suggests but doesn't come out and say that Joe DiMaggio and Marilyn Monroe were competitive about their celebrity. How does Talese use Monroe's mythical status to develop his portrait of DiMaggio?
Which of these lines from "A
Piece of String" illustrates
Matre Hauchecome's
conflict?
A. "...he took a turn in the village...He only
met with incredulity. It made him ill at
night."
B. "Along all the roads around Goderville
the peasants and their wives were coming
toward the burgh..."
C. "The news had spread."
Answer:
letter
C. "The news had spread
which statement is true about non-verbal communication? a. when verbal and nonverbal messages conflict words are more persuasive than nonverbal cues. b. emotions are contagious c. body language accounts for most of the message we send to others. d. nonverbal cues are automatic echoes of spoken messages.
Body language accounts for most of the message we send to others, emotions are contagious, and nonverbal cues are more influential than verbal cues when they conflict.
Explanation:The correct statement about non-verbal communication is option c, body language accounts for most of the message we send to others. Nonverbal cues such as facial expressions, gestures, and posture play a significant role in communication and can convey more information than verbal cues alone. For example, a person's tone of voice may say one thing, but their body language might indicate a different message.
Emotions being contagious, as mentioned in option b, is a common observation in human interactions. When someone displays a particular emotion, it can trigger a similar emotion in others through non-verbal cues like facial expressions. This is known as emotional contagion.
Option a is incorrect because when verbal and nonverbal messages conflict, nonverbal cues are often more influential. People tend to rely on and trust nonverbal cues over verbal ones, as they are considered more genuine and harder to control or fake.
Option d is also incorrect because nonverbal cues are not automatic echoes of spoken messages. Nonverbal cues can enhance, contradict, or complement verbal messages, but they are not mere echoes.
Learn more about Nonverbal communication here:https://brainly.com/question/33004637
#SPJ2
The most universally true statement about non-verbal communication is that body language accounts for most of the message we send to others. While the other statements can be true in some instances, they're not universally applicable across cultures and situations.
Explanation:Each statement given about non-verbal communication has some degree of truth, but the most universally accepted statement is c. body language accounts for most of the message we send to others. Non-verbal communication is a large part of our daily interactions and can often convey more meaning than our words. For instance, a person could be saying positive things, but their body language might reveal discomfort, distrust, or disinterest.
Statement a, that when verbal and nonverbal messages conflict words are more persuasive, can be true in some cultures but is not universally true. In many instances, if there's a conflict between what's being said and body language, people are more likely to believe the body language. Statement b, that emotions are contagious, is also somewhat true in the sense that we often respond to others' expressions of emotion with similar emotions. Statement d, nonverbal cues are automatic echoes of spoken messages, is not entirely accurate, as nonverbal cues often provide additional information or reinforce what's being said.
Learn more about Non-Verbal Communication here:
https://brainly.com/question/33980890
#SPJ2
In 2016, American singer-songwriter Bob Dylan was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature, making him the first musician to ever receive the award. The award sparked debates about whether a musician qualifies for the award. Educate yourself about both sides of the argument and form your own opinion about the topic. Read the four articles provided here to learn more about both sides of the argument.
Write an essay to present an argument that either supports or opposes the decision to award a singer-songwriter the Nobel Prize in Literature. Your argument should include a clear claim, logical reasons, and evidence that is relevant and sufficient.
can u pleaze write it for me if you've done I alr, I'm late on my assignments.
Answer:
own opinion about the topic. Read the four articles pr
what does john tear up at the end of act 2? why does he tear up his confession at the end of this act
At the end of Act 2, John tears up his confession that he had signed, which was a lie in The Crucible by Arthur Miller. John Proctor had already agreed to confess to being in contact with the devil, as he was tired of being accused of things he didn't do.
However, he refused to implicate others as well. However, in Act 2, he felt the weight of the consequences and the loss of his good name, which led him to sign a false confession. At the end of Act 2, he saw that other people were also falsely confessing to witchcraft to avoid being executed.
John tears up his confession because he chooses to die rather than confess to a falsehood. He realizes that he can't accept the results of signing a false confession. It is the only way to ensure that he will die with his integrity and honesty intact. He wants his life to have meaning and to be remembered with dignity. He refuses to be another one of Salem's liars, even if it means facing the gallows.
know more about confession here
https://brainly.com/question/15519194#
#SPJ11
Imelda Marcos was the wife of the president of the Philippines. She loved to buy shoes. She had 3,000 pairs of shoes. The text is about:
Select one:
a. Shopping. B. Hobby of the president's wife of the Philippines. C. Shoes sold in the Philippines
The text is about the hobby of the president's wife of the Philippines, Imelda Marcos, who loved to buy shoes and had 3,000 pairs of shoes. Therefore, the correct answer is B.
Imelda Marcos, the wife of the previous president of the Philippines, was well-known for her expensive hobby of purchasing shoes, which is the subject of the text. The luxuries of her lifestyle and her wasteful spending tendencies are highlighted by the fact that she had collected a collection of 3,000 pairs of shoes. Her collection of shoes came to represent her excess and extravagance at a time when many Filipinos were living in poverty. The narrative is more about Imelda Marcos' personal habits and reputation than it is about shopping in general or the kinds of shoes marketed in the Philippines. Her shoe collection has gained notoriety and been the focus of books, movies, and even a museum display.
To know more about president, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25822980
#SPJ4
On board were 50 man with trinkets and treasures intanded for trading with the native peoples when they disembarked
The section in question makes no mention of a person called Hester. Hence, it is impossible to draw any conclusions about her character from this text.
In the section that follows, 50 men are described as being aboard a ship that is laden with goods and riches for trading with indigenous peoples. Hester is not mentioned, thus it is impossible to draw any conclusions about her personality from this text. To comprehend the personalities and their characteristics, it's crucial to attentively examine a piece and take the context into account. Analyzing a character's actions, language, and interactions with other characters is necessary to draw judgements about them. In order to fully comprehend and evaluate the characters and their features, it is crucial to read and scrutinise the entire book. 30 word response.
learn more about trading here:
https://brainly.com/question/8322028
#SPJ4
22. according to the origin of language, what is the difference between a closed communication system and an open communication system?
According to the origin of language, the difference between a closed communication system and an open communication system is: A closed communication system is a language that is used only by a particular group of people.
Whereas an open communication system is a language that is used by people in different communities or countries.
A closed communication system refers to a language that is limited to a particular group of people or community. This language is often used in a specific region or area and is not widely spoken outside the area. In other words, it is a language that is not spoken by people in different countries or communities.
Examples of a closed communication system include indigenous languages like Native American or Australian aboriginal languages. An open communication system refers to a language that is used by people in different countries or communities. This language is widely spoken and understood by people in different regions and countries. It is a language that is not limited to a specific area or community. Examples of an open communication system include English, French, and Spanish.
know more about communication system here
https://brainly.com/question/18825060#
#SPJ11
the preservation of endangered orangutans in borneo has a high priority among conservation biologists. which of these approaches has been least successful for preserving the orangutans' habitats?
The preservation of endangered orangutans in Borneo has a high priority among conservation biologists. The least successful approach for preserving the orangutan's habitat is through deforestation.
Here, correct option is A.
Deforestation is an unsustainable activity that involves the removal of trees from a forested area, which can have significant negative impacts on biodiversity, including orangutan habitats. Deforestation is the purposeful clearing of forested land.
Deforestation is a leading cause of habitat loss and fragmentation, as it destroys forests and the habitats of many species, including orangutans. Therefore, deforestation is an approach that has been least successful for preserving orangutan habitats.
Therefore, correct option is A.
know more about deforestation here
https://brainly.com/question/14630135#
#SPJ11
complete question is :-
the preservation of endangered orangutans in borneo has a high priority among conservation biologists. which of these approaches has been least successful for preserving the orangutans' habitats?
A. Deforestation
B. Forestation
C. Ecosystem
D. none
What is the theme of "Does Time Pass" by Peter Dizikes
Answer:
The theme of "Does Time Pass" by Peter Dizikes is the nature of time and how it affects our lives. The poem explores the idea that time is relative and that it can expand or contract depending on our perception. The poem also discusses the paradoxical nature of time, as time can seem to stand still, even though it is constantly moving. The poem ultimately suggests that the only way to truly understand and appreciate time is to live in the present.
Explanation:
Hope this right answer...
at the beginning of an oral presentation, skyler uses a quotation from abraham lincoln. skyler is attempting to .
At the beginning of an oral presentation, Skyler uses a quotation from Abraham Lincoln. Skyler is attempting to set a tone of respect and importance for the presentation by using a quotation from a highly respected figure.
Skyler introduces an oral presentation with a quote from Abraham Lincoln. By quoting a well-known person, Skyler is seeking to establish a tone of deference and importance for the presentation.
This conveys that the subject of the presentation is of significant importance and should be taken seriously. It also serves as an inspiration to the audience to give the presentation their full attention.
To learn more about oral presentation link is here
brainly.com/question/5106442
#SPJ4
Theseus tells Hermia that she should view her father as a God. What is his meaning with this comparison?
Question 25 options:
Theseus believes that Egeus is the best man alive
Theseus thinks all sacrifices should be made for Egeus
Theseus believes that Egeus created Hermia and she should obey him
Theseus believes that Hermia is worthless
Answer: Theseus belives that Egeus created Hermia and she should obey him
10. How does Solomon support his claim that the people who accept their depression are the most resilient in overcoming it?
What does richard wright learn from his experiences in the excerpt you read from black boy?
From the excerpt of Black Boy, Richard Wright learns the importance of education and the power of knowledge.
He also learns the importance of perseverance and hard work, as well as the importance of self-motivation and self-reliance. Additionally, he learns the value of standing up for himself and not letting fear or intimidation prevent him from pursuing his goals.
He also learns that it is important to be honest and to respect the opinions of others, even if they are different from his own. Finally, he learns that having friends and family who support him is invaluable and can make all the difference when faced with difficult challenges.
To learn more about Richard Wright Black Boy link is here
brainly.com/question/26891792
#SPJ4
Find real world connections in chapters 1-5 of “Night” by Elie Wiesel. They could be world events, people, and similar events at other times/places. Finding other books, movies, poems, songs etc that are based on similar stories or times in history.
Answer:
Night is used throughout the book to symbolize death, darkness of the soul, and loss of faith. As an image, it comes up repeatedly.
in the book kindred by octavia bulter how do dana and kevin experience their time in the past differently? for, example, when they witness a group of slave children acting out the scene of a slave auction, how do each of them react? what does this reveal about their characters?
Dana initially appears to have a harder time adjusting to life in the past, as she is black and must deal with the additional pressure of being a slave. Kevin, on the other hand, is white, so he does not have to deal with the same level of racial discrimination that Dana does.
Dana is visibly disturbed by the scene, and her reaction is to physically attack the white man playing the auctioneer. Kevin remains calm and rational, recognizing that they are in a different time and that this is the way things were done at the time. This event reveals that Dana is a very strong-willed and impulsive person, while Kevin is more measured and reasonable.
Dana and Kevin's experiences in the past differ significantly. Dana initially appears to have a harder time adjusting to life in the past, as she is black and must deal with the additional pressure of being a slave. Kevin, on the other hand, is white, so he does not have to deal with the same level of racial discrimination that Dana does, which makes him appear to adapt more easily to life in the past.
In the book Kindred by Octavia Butler, when Dana and Kevin witness a group of slave children acting out the scene of a slave auction, Dana is visibly disturbed by the scene, and her reaction is to physically attack the white man playing the auctioneer.
In contrast, Kevin remains calm and rational, recognizing that they are in a different time and that this is the way things were done at the time. This event reveals that Dana is a very strong-willed and impulsive person, while Kevin is more measured and reasonable. Furthermore, it demonstrates how differently they have adapted to their new surroundings.
In conclusion, the novel Kindred by Octavia Butler provides an insightful look at how two people can experience the same event differently based on their backgrounds, experiences, and personalities. The scene in which Dana and Kevin witness the slave auction is just one example of how they experience the past differently.
For more such questions on racial discrimination, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/19908071
#SPJ11
Write a letter to the district executive stating 3 reasons why canning should be band in my school
Answer:
because
Explanation:
because
Explain why we feel anger towards Macbeth in Act 3 Scene 2. Provide proof from the text to support your answers.
Answer:
In Act 3 Scene 2 of Macbeth, we feel anger towards Macbeth because of his callous treatment towards Banquo and his lack of concern for the lives of those around him. Macbeth's actions in this scene show a complete disregard for morality and human life, making him a highly unsympathetic character.
One of the primary reasons we feel anger towards Macbeth in this scene is his decision to have Banquo killed. Banquo is Macbeth's former friend and ally, but he becomes a threat to Macbeth's power as he is prophesied to father a line of kings. Macbeth decides to have Banquo killed to eliminate this threat, and in doing so, he demonstrates his lack of loyalty and betrayal towards someone who was once close to him. Macbeth's willingness to murder his former friend and ally is an act of extreme callousness, and it makes him highly unsympathetic.
Furthermore, Macbeth's lack of concern for the lives of those around him is evident in this scene. He orders the murder of Banquo and his son without any regard for their humanity or the impact this will have on their loved ones. Macbeth even goes so far as to say that he would rather risk his own life than have Banquo's descendants inherit the throne. This shows a complete disregard for human life and makes Macbeth a highly unsympathetic character.
For example, Macbeth says, "It is concluded. Banquo, thy soul's flight, / If it find heaven, must find it out tonight" (Act 3, Scene 2, lines 151-152). This statement shows that Macbeth has no qualms about ordering Banquo's murder and is willing to take his life without any hesitation. This callous attitude towards human life is what makes us feel anger towards Macbeth in this scene.
Which statement would be MOST important to include in a summary of the article?
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
Many of the rights and freedoms of democracies are restricted or eliminated by authoritarian regimes.
Option B is correct.
What is democracies?Democracy is a form of government in which power is vested in the people and exercised by them either directly or through elected representatives. It is a system of government based on the principle of popular sovereignty, in which all citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.
Democracy is the most widely accepted form of government and is practiced in some form in almost all countries. In democracies, people have the right to freedom of speech, assembly, and the press, and the right to vote for their representatives. Democracies also allow for individual rights, such as the right to privacy and the right to own property.
Democracies are intended to provide a fair and equal representation of citizens and also to ensure that the government is accountable to its citizens.
Incomplete Question:
Which statement would be MOST important to include in a summary of the article? Group of answer choices
A.Citizens who compete for political leadership positions in democracies have varied personal backgrounds.
B.Many of the rights and freedoms of democracies are restricted or eliminated by authoritarian regimes.
C.Authoritarian leaders come from small groups of top military officials and aristocratic families.
D.It is dangerous to categorize a nation simply by the moment in time during which it was studied.
Learn more about Government :
brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
ACE the question in the story animal farm orwell suggests that the pigs are most clever in what area?
The pigs and dogs are the great at reading and writing, while Boxer and most of the different animals do now not possess the identical knowledge.
What are the pigs most sensible in Animal Farm?Terms in this set (12) You are instructed "the pigs have been so smart that they may want to think of a way round each difficulty." Apparently it is due to the fact of their cleverness that they do not do bodily work, however supervise others.
Why have been the pigs described as smart Animal Farm?The pigs, being the power hungry animals that they are, teach themselves how to study and write. They comprehend that they are a whole lot smarter than all of the other animals on the farm. Since the different animals may want to no longer learn how to read or write, the pigs used this as leverage to get power.
Learn more about orwell here;
https://brainly.com/question/27908642
#SPJ1
what is ian mortimer's primary purpose in this passage? how does mortimer most clearly achieve this purpose?
Ian Mortimer's primary purpose in this passage is to highlight the significance of the cultural impact of the first king of England, Athelstan. Mortimer most clearly achieves this purpose through the use of various rhetorical strategies. The passage describes Athelstan's reign, which saw England emerge as a united nation-state.
Mortimer highlights the significance of this through his use of rhetorical questions that question the reader's understanding of England's origins and the role Athelstan played in them.
For example, Mortimer asks, "Did England begin in the fifth century with the departure of the Roman legions, or in the sixth century with the arrival of the Angles and Saxons, or in the ninth century with the Viking invasions?"
By posing these questions, Mortimer is challenging the reader to question their assumptions about the origins of England and recognize the cultural importance of Athelstan's reign. The use of a rhetorical question is a common literary device used to engage and persuade the reader.
Mortimer also uses vivid imagery, such as "tide of blood" and "three days of non-stop fighting," to create a sense of urgency and excitement around the events of Athelstan's reign. This technique is commonly referred to as imagery, and it is a powerful tool for creating a mental image in the reader's mind. The passage's structure is also important in achieving Mortimer's primary purpose.
He starts by asking a series of rhetorical questions and then goes on to describe Athelstan's reign in vivid detail. This technique is commonly referred to as the "hook" and "bridge" method, where the author hooks the reader with an interesting question or idea and then bridges to the main topic.
The passage's tone is also critical to achieving Mortimer's primary purpose.
His tone is informative and educational, but it is also enthusiastic and passionate about the subject matter. This tone helps to create a sense of excitement and interest around the subject and encourages the reader to learn more about Athelstan's reign and the origins of England.
To know more about united nation-state refer to-
brainly.com/question/17136740#
#SPJ11
Answer:
b and a
Explanation:
On September 12, 1962, President John F. Kennedy delivered his "We Choose to Go to the Moon" speech to a crowd of thousands at Rice University Stadium in Houston, Texas. The country was unsure about the time and cost of sending a man to the moon, and President Kennedy's speech addressed their uncertainty. Read the excerpts from Kennedy's speech. Then, respond to the prompt that follows.
I am delighted to be here, and I'm particularly delighted to be here on this occasion. We meet at a college noted for knowledge, in a city noted for progress, in a State noted for strength, and we stand in need of all three, for we meet in an hour of change and challenge, in a decade of hope and fear, in an age of both knowledge and ignorance. The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds.
Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation's own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.
If this capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not, and it is one of the great adventures of all time, and no nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in the race for space.
Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it—we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace.
We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say that we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.
Answer:
On September 12, 1962, President John F. Kennedy delivered a speech at Rice University Stadium in Houston, Texas, in which he declared his intention to send a man to the moon. In his speech, Kennedy acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the time and cost of this endeavor, but insisted that the exploration of space was necessary for progress and leadership in the world. Kennedy emphasized the importance of knowledge, progress, and strength, and noted that despite the vast increase in scientific knowledge and manpower, there were still vast unknowns to explore. He also pointed out that the United States needed to take a leading role in space exploration in order to prevent it from being governed by a hostile flag of conquest, and that it was important to use new knowledge and rights for the progress of all people. Kennedy acknowledged the high cost of the space program, but argued that it was worth the investment for the benefits that would come from exploring space. He famously declared, "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard." Kennedy's speech is considered a landmark moment in American history, as it set the goal that led to the successful Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969.
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on what you've shared, it seems that the purpose of President Kennedy's speech at Rice University in 1962 was to build public support for his proposal to land a man on the Moon before the end of the decade. By speaking at a university known for its expertise in science and technology, Kennedy likely aimed to inspire and rally the academic and scientific community behind his vision for space exploration, while also appealing to the broader public's sense of national pride and curiosity about the unknown. The speech also aimed to reassure Americans that their government was committed to advancing the country's scientific and technological capabilities, especially in the midst of the Cold War.
Analyse the sentence into clause (1) I shall go because he has invited me.
Answer:
I shall go | because he has invited me.
Main clause | Subordinate clause
Explanation:
The sentence "I shall go because he has invited me" contains two clauses:
Main clause "I shall go"
This is an independent clause that stands alone as a complete sentence. It contains a subject "I" and a predicate "shall go". The main clause expresses the main idea of the sentence.
Subordinate clause "because he has invited me"
This is a dependent clause that cannot stand alone as a sentence. It starts with the subordinating conjunction "because" and contains a subject "he" and a predicate "has invited me". The subordinate clause functions as an adverb in the sentence and modifies the main clause by giving a reason for the speaker's action.
The sentence is a complex sentence because it contains one main clause and one subordinate clause. The main clause can stand alone as a complete sentence, but the subordinate clause cannot. The subordinate clause adds information to the main clause by providing a reason for the speaker's action.