In the opening months of Taft's administration, when he called Congress into special session to lower protective tariff rates, the House of Representatives passed a bill that lowered tariffs.
On August 5, 1909, the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act, which implemented the tariff reductions, was signed into law by Taft. The Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act was supposed to lower the protective tariff rates. The legislation failed to achieve Taft's goals, but it was hailed as a step forward by most progressives.
The tariff rates, on the other hand, were reduced as a result of the law. The bill provided for the removal of the existing duties on certain commodities and the lowering of rates on others. There was a debate among progressive Republican and Democratic members of Congress over the issue of tariff reform.
Taft worked to reduce tariffs and change the national government's role in business. The bill failed to reduce tariffs as much as Taft had hoped, and it became the subject of controversy within the Republican Party.
To know more about House of Representatives, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29391300#
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT a
method of budget balancing?
A. cyclical
B. annual
C. spend and check
Which two countries received the most aid?
Answer:
if you are talking about the Cold war then Great Britain and France received the most aid during that time.
QUICK 25 points !!For this assignment, you will write complete paragraphs to answer questions about 19th-century conflicts between the United States and Mexico.
To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all of the questions completely.
This assignment is worth 30 points.
WRITE PARAGRAPH ANSWERS
Answer each question in a complete paragraph, including a topic sentence that restates the question, at least three supporting detail sentences, and a concluding sentence that wraps up the paragraph. Be sure to use evidence from the lesson to support your ideas.
1. What caused the Mexican-American War? (6 points)
2. How did the Mexican-American War end? (6 points)
3. What were three major consequences of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo for Mexico? (6 points)
4. What was the Gadsden Purchase? (6 points)
5. Do you think the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did enough to protect the rights of Mexican citizens whose land became part of the United States? Why? (6 points)
The Mexican-American War, sometimes referred to as the Mexican War in the United States and as the American Intervention in Mexico (IEM) in Mexico, lasted from 1846 to 1848.
In the 1800s, what led to war between the US and Mexico?The so-called Mexican-American War took place between Mexico and the United States. The duration of this fight was 1846–1848. Mexico awarded the United States territory after the conflict. These lands currently make up parts of Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, and several more states.
What sparked the conflict between US and Mexico?The Mexican-American War was directly sparked by disputed land on the Nueces Strip between Texas and the United States. Mexican authorities and citizens were upset by Texas's admission to the United States because Mexico did not recognize Texas as an official American territory.
Unknown factors might have contributed to the Mexican War's termination.In September 1847, when its army was routed and the capital, Mexico City, fell, the Mexican government submitted to American demands and started peace negotiations.
As a result of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, what three changes did Mexico go through?As a result of the pact, Mexico's land area was almost cut in half, while the United States' territory more than quadrupled. Both countries had long-term effects from this land swap. The victory and signature of the treaty gave the United States access to the Pacific Ocean and a wealth of ports, minerals, and other natural resources that would not have been accessible to a developing country.
What did Gadsden's acquisition consist of?The Gadsden Purchase, also recognized as the Gadsden Treaty, was an arrangement between the United States and Mexico that's been finalized in 1854. It stated that the United States will indeed pay Mexico $10 million for a component of Mexico that encased 29,670 square miles and afterward became a part of Arizona and New Mexico.
Do you believe the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo done enough to safeguard the rights of Mexican nationals whose territory was annexed by the US? Why?During treaty negotiations, it was necessary to clarify the legal standing of the thousands of Mexican, Spanish, and mestizo people of the annexation territory. Notwithstanding these safeguards, the bulk of them were deprived of their possessions and privileges as Anglo Americans founded state governments and settled in the southwest.
Learn more about Gadsden Treaty: https://brainly.com/question/8964816
#SPJ1
explain one way in which the dates of indepence could be intepreted as illustrating the way in which independence movements spread through latin america
Answer: The dates of independence in Latin America can be interpreted as illustrating the way in which independence movements spread through the region through a process of contagion or diffusion.
Starting with the Haitian Revolution in 1791, which was the first successful slave rebellion in the Americas, the ideas of freedom, equality, and democracy began to spread throughout the region. This inspired other revolutionary movements in countries such as Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexico, which gained independence in the early 19th century.
The dates of independence in Latin America reflect this process of contagion, with the independence movements spreading from country to country over a period of several decades. For example, after Haiti gained independence in 1804, Venezuela declared independence in 1811, followed by Colombia in 1813, Argentina in 1816, Chile in 1818, and Mexico in 1821.
This pattern suggests that the independence movements in Latin America were not isolated events, but rather part of a broader regional process of political and social change. The ideas and ideals of the Enlightenment, which emphasized individual rights, popular sovereignty, and the rule of law, played a key role in inspiring these movements and uniting them against the colonial powers.
Explanation:
how and why did islam play a role in the rapid creation and expansion of arab empires in the 7th-8th centuries?
Islam played a significant role in the rapid creation and expansion of Arab empires in the 7th-8th centuries, as Islam gave them recognition and faith in something.
The reason behind this is that Islam gave Arabs a sense of identity, a common language, and religious beliefs that allowed them to unite under one banner.
It provided a cultural and social framework that made it easier for them to conquer and rule vast territories. This religious and cultural unity enabled the Arabs to create a powerful empire in a relatively short time span, and also allowed them to hold it together despite its diverse nature.
This unity also helped the Arab empires to maintain their power and influence over an extended period. Islam also played a crucial role in the expansion of Arab empires because it offered a new religion that was more appealing than the ones that existed at that time.
Islam's emphasis on egalitarianism, social justice, and piety attracted many people who were tired of the corruption and hypocrisy of the existing religions. Islam's teachings and practices also gave a sense of purpose to the Arabs, who felt that they were the chosen people of God and had a divine mission to spread Islam to other lands.
This sense of mission and purpose made them more willing to fight for their beliefs and to expand their empire.
Thus, Islam played a significant role in the rapid creation and expansion of Arab empires in the 7th-8th centuries, providing them with a cultural and social framework that allowed them to unite under one banner, conquer vast territories, and maintain their power and influence over an extended period.
To know more about Islam, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29724916#
#SPJ11
which statements about the education of native americans and black americans in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century are true?
Answer:
1. Native Americans and Black Americans were often denied access to formal education.
2. Native Americans and Black Americans were often forced to attend segregated schools.
3. Native Americans and Black Americans were often taught in their own languages.
4. Native Americans and Black Americans were often taught by white teachers.
how did the textile industry change the focus of south Carolina's economy? Helped to move the economy away from _____ or sharecropping
Answer:
From the late nineteenth century through most of the twentieth century, the textile industry dominated South Carolina manufacturing. It employed the majority of all manufacturing workers, and its company towns set the terms of life for thousands of white Carolinians.
Explanation:
True/False: bible graphs showing jewish history of bible interpretation hellinistic judaism midieval period reformation
Answer: True
Explanation:
What was the immediate goal of the Albany Movement?
to end integration in Albany, Georgia
What did protest leaders anticipate would occur at the end of the Albany Movement?
What types of tactics did protesters in Albany use?
Why did the Albany police arrest more than 500 protesters?
Why did Martin Luther King Jr. come to Albany, Georgia?
Why was the Albany Movement unsuccessful?
Skip to navigation
Answer:
What did protest leaders anticipate would occur at the end of the Albany Movement?
Protest leaders anticipated that the Albany Movement would result in the desegregation of all public facilities in the city, including schools, buses, and government buildings. They also hoped that it would inspire similar movements throughout the South and bring national attention to the struggle for civil rights. However, the movement ultimately fell short of its goals.
What types of tactics did protesters in Albany use?
Protesters in Albany used a variety of nonviolent tactics, including sit-ins, boycotts, and marches. They also engaged in voter registration drives and economic boycotts of local businesses that refused to desegregate.
Why did the Albany police arrest more than 500 protesters?
The Albany police arrested more than 500 protesters in an attempt to intimidate and discourage them from continuing their nonviolent protests. They also hoped to disrupt the momentum of the movement and prevent it from gaining widespread support.
Why did Martin Luther King Jr. come to Albany, Georgia?
Martin Luther King Jr. came to Albany, Georgia, in December 1961 to support the Albany Movement and help coordinate its strategy. His involvement brought national attention to the struggle for civil rights in Albany and helped to inspire similar movements throughout the South.
Why was the Albany Movement unsuccessful?
The Albany Movement was ultimately unsuccessful in achieving its immediate goals of desegregating public facilities in Albany. Despite the efforts of civil rights leaders, the movement faced fierce opposition from local officials and segregationists, and internal disagreements among protest leaders also weakened its effectiveness. However, the Albany Movement did lay the groundwork for future civil rights struggles and helped to inspire a new generation of activists.
THIS IS FOR ECONOMICS (please help)
Michelle promised her niece that she would take her to the movies Friday night after work. At lunch the boss informs Michelle that she needs to stay late and complete and post reports that evening. What are the opportunity costs and trade-offs of Michelle using that evening to complete that report for her boss? What ultimately is the deciding factor?
Answer:
the opportunity costs is that she will not get time to spend with her niece
explain the significance of the following dates: 1607, founding of jamestown; 1620, arrival of the pilgrims and signing of the mayflower compact; 1776, adoption of the declaration of independence; 1787, writing of the u.s. constitution; 1803, louisiana purchase; and 1861-1865, civil war.
The dates 1607, 1620, 1776, 1787, 1803, and 1861-1865 are significant in United States history.
1607 marks the founding of Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in America. 1620 marks the arrival of the Pilgrims and the signing of the Mayflower Compact. 1776 is the date the Declaration of Independence was adopted, declaring the independence of the United States.
1787 marks the writing of the U.S. Constitution, which formed the laws and government of the nation. 1803 marks the Louisiana Purchase, which doubled the size of the country.
1861-1865 marks the Civil War, which was fought between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. These dates are all important because they mark the major events that shaped the United States as we know it today.
To know more about Civil War click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
What were the Ottoman Empire's motives for carrying out the Armenian genocide and its impact on its Armenian subjects?
The Armenian Genocide was a systematic extermination of the Armenian population by the Ottoman Empire during World War I. The Ottoman Empire was motivated by various factors to carry out the genocide, including nationalism, religious differences, and economic interests.
One of the primary motives for the Armenian Genocide was nationalism. The Ottoman Empire was a Muslim state, and the Armenian population was largely Christian. As nationalism and the desire for homogeneity increased in the Ottoman Empire, the Armenian population was viewed as a threat to the empire's unity and identity.
The Ottoman Empire also had economic interests in the region, and the Armenian population was seen as a potential economic rival. Many Armenians were involved in business, and some were wealthy landowners. The Ottoman Empire saw the elimination of the Armenian population as a way to gain control of their economic resources.
The impact of the Armenian Genocide on the Armenian population was devastating. Estimates suggest that between 1 and 1.5 million Armenians were killed or deported during the genocide. The genocide had a profound impact on Armenian culture, as many churches, monasteries, and cultural sites were destroyed. The Armenian population was also displaced from their homes, and many were forced to flee the country.
The Armenian Genocide remains a significant event in Armenian history, and the Armenian community worldwide continues to demand recognition of the genocide as a deliberate act of genocide by the Ottoman Empire.
Which of the following statements best explains basic Northern bellefs prior to the Civil War?
Answer:
states needed to be given more control
Answer:
All people were created equal, regardless of color
Explanation:
he Civil War, or American Civil War, was a war waged in the United States from 1861 to 1865. As a result, among other things, of a historical controversy over slavery and against attempts by the US federal executive to take powers that do not corresponded constitutionally, the war broke out in April 1861, when the forces of the Confederate States of America attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina, shortly after President Abraham Lincoln took office. The nationalists of the Union proclaimed loyalty to the Constitution of the United States. They clashed with secessionists from the Confederate States, who defended the rights of states to expand slavery.
Hope this helps!
Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/3213802#readmore
plea bargains a.are no longer a major part of the criminal justice system. b.have been openly discussed since the 1920s. c.were generally negotiated in secret late 1970s/early 1980s. d.were generally negotiated in secret in the 1920s.
Plea bargains were generally negotiated in secret late 1970s/early 1980s. Therefore the correct option is option C.
A plea bargain is a deal that a defendant enters into with the prosecutor in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty or no contest in exchange for a lighter sentence or a reduced charge.
The plea agreement may be entered into at any time during the case's trial, including before or after the trial has begun. It is known to have been secretively negotiated during the late 1970s/early 1980s.
A plea bargain refers to a deal made between the prosecutor and the defendant to avoid going to trial, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty or no contest in exchange for a lighter sentence or a reduced charge.
Although plea bargains have been openly discussed since the 1920s, they were generally negotiated in secret until late 1970s/early 1980s. Therefore the correct option is option C.
For such more question on Plea:
https://brainly.com/question/11974746
#SPJ11
Salutary neglect refers only to the English government’s lack of oversight of the colonial economy
True or false
False, Salutary neglect refers only to the English government’s lack of oversight of the colonial economy.
What is benevolent neglect and how does it affect the expansion of colonial government?The definition of salutary neglect refers to an unofficial British policy in which the American colonies and trade were subjected to a lax or nonexistent application of parliamentary rules and laws.
\What is meant by salutary neglect?Salutary neglect was Britain's covert strategy to ease the enforcement of stringent laws, particularly trade laws, imposed on the American colonies in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. Robert Walpole, the first Prime Minister, initiated it.
To know more about English government’s visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/20801055
#SPJ1
when the confederation congress called for a new convention in 1787, they did so with the stated purpose of
When the Confederation Congress called for a new convention in 1787, they did so with the stated purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation.
'What is the confederation congress?The Confederation Congress refers to the national government of the United States that existed from March 1, 1781, to March 4, 1789. The government of the United States was based on the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government and a powerful state government.
What was the purpose of the Constitutional Convention?The purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Confederation Congress called for a new convention in 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation because the existing system of government wasn't working.
The Articles of Confederation created a government that was too weak to solve the country's problems. The delegates to the Constitutional Convention decided that they couldn't revise the Articles of Confederation and that a new system of government was required.
They drafted a new constitution that created a strong central government with a system of checks and balances. The Constitution created a new government that was able to solve the country's problems.
TO KNOW ABOUT national government":
https://brainly.com/question/11972822
#SPJ11
how did John Adams led the U.S. foreign policy with a goal of peace? list some examples
He tried to keep up with Washington's impartial international strategy position, yet progressively wound up wrestling with France in the supposed "Semi Battle" during his main term in office, from 1797 to 1801.
What are 3 significant achievements of John Adams?He went to Harvard as a lawyer and quickly became a patriot; As a delegate to the First and Second Continental Congresses, he led the fight for independence. During the Revolutionary War, he assisted in the negotiation of the peace treaty and served in diplomatic capacities in Holland and France. Adams appoints Charles C. Pinckney, Elbridge Gerry, and John Marshall to a three-man commission to negotiate a settlement with France. Congress gives President Adams permission to form a defense militia of 80,000 men in the event of war with France.
To learn more about patriot visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14855779
#SPJ1
how many immigrants entered the united states between 1865 and 1915?
Answer:
During 1865 and 1915, more than 25 million immigrants came to America
why did the cherokee nation act to protect its homelands?
The Cherokee Nation took action to defend its ancestral lands because the US government was threatening to forcibly remove them.
The Cherokee Nation lived in the southern United States at the beginning of the 19th century, including sections of modern-day North Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, and Georgia. Yet when white settlers grew closer to Cherokee territory, the US government pushed for their eviction to make room for additional settling. The Indian Removal Act, which was approved in 1830, gave permission for the forcible transfer of Native American tribes to Indian Territory in modern-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee Nation objected to this strategy, claiming that they had their own independent judicial and governmental structures. In the historic Worcester v. Georgia case, they even appealed to the Supreme Court, which upheld their right to self-governance. But, in 1838, the US government disregarded the decision.
Learn more about Cherokee here:
https://brainly.com/question/13839435
#SPJ4
Which civil rights organization helped organize the freedom summer campaign
Answer:
The movement was organized by civil rights organizations like the Congress on Racial Equality (CORE) and the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) and run by the local Council of Federated Organizations (COFO).
Explanation:
In the summer of 1964 the Council of Federated Organizations (COFO) began organizing a movement regarding voting rights.
Why do you think anthropologists photograph remote tribes from helicopters rather than interacting with them directly?
What might make communities like the Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw more willing to leave their ancestral land?
The Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw have a reputation for resilience and resistance. Meanwhile, their resilience is being put to the test once more as their ancestral home is being destroyed.
What happened to the tribe of Choctaw?Following a contentious discussion, President Andrew Jackson and the US Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, which obliged the Choctaw and other tribes to completely abandon their ancestral lands and migrate westward. With just five votes, the bill was approved by the House in May 1830.
Why were the Choctaw forced to leave their homeland?The forced transfer of American Indians from the South to regions west of the Mississippi River in the early 1800s was one of Mississippi's and the United States' most heinous acts. Because of the constant demand for Indigenous lands, removal took place.
To know more about Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30122924
#SPJ1
true or false? as the roman republican story progressed, roman armies began being tools of political ambition, causing regular clashes between roman armies and civil war
The given statement 'As the roman republican story progressed, roman armies began being tools of political ambition, causing regular clashes between roman armies and civil war' is true.
What is the Roman Republic?
The Roman Republic was the era of the ancient Roman civilization, starting with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire.
The Roman Republic is divided into two main periods: the Roman Republic proper (509–27 BC) and the Late Roman Republic (133–27 BC).During this period, the Roman Republic engaged in many battles and military campaigns, both with other powers and within the Republic itself.
These conflicts had political undertones, with powerful politicians using the military to achieve their own political goals. This often caused clashes between Roman armies and civil wars, as different factions struggled for power and control over the Republic.
Therefore, the statement that As the Roman Republican story progressed, Roman armies began being tools of political ambition, causing regular clashes between Roman armies and civil war is true.
Learn more about Roman Republic here:
brainly.com/question/19051777
#SPJ11
16. What does William Travis do when he finds out that Jim Bowie has taken it upon
himself to request a truce?
William Travis, upon finding out that Jim Bowie had taken it upon himself to request a truce with General Santa Anna's Mexican army, was furious. He believed that such an action was a sign of cowardice and an insult to the bravery and sacrifice of the defenders of the Alamo. Travis immediately took command and declared that there would be no truce or surrender, and that they would fight to the death if necessary. He drew a line in the sand with his sword and asked any man who was willing to stay and fight to cross it. All of the defenders, including Jim Bowie who was very ill, crossed the line, reaffirming their commitment to the cause.
*pics are shown theyre two answers in one
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Look at this excerpt from Nelson Mandela's speech.
In this excerpt from his speech, Mandela uses an appeal to emotion to advance his point of view that he and his fellow citizens feel deeply connected to their country.
What does Nelson Mandela mean in this speech?Nelson Mandela compares the attachment that he and his compatriots feel to the soil of their country to the attachment that the jacaranda trees of Pretoria and the mimosa trees of the bushveld have to the soil.
This analogy is an appeal to emotion, and a persuasive technique that helps to illustrate the depth of feeling that Mandela and his compatriots have for their country. The use of the analogy is effective because it creates a visual image that helps the audience to understand the connection that Mandela and his fellow citizens have to their country.
Find out more on Nelson Mandela at https://brainly.com/question/11935085
#SPJ1
✓ Details
In 3-5 sentences, assess the wisdom of US involvement in Vietnam: What were the arguments put forth by Hawks for us to be
there? What were the arguments put forth by Doves for us to pull out? Which argument do you agree with more? Why?
The wisdom of US involvement in Vietnam is a complex issue with arguments on both sides.
what does Hawks argue and what was the war?
Hawks argued that the US needed to contain the spread of communism and protect its allies in Southeast Asia. They believed that the US had a moral obligation to defend democracy and human rights against the threat of communism.
Doves, on the other hand, argued that the war was a costly and unnecessary intervention in a civil conflict that the US had no business in. They believed that the war was causing unnecessary death and suffering, and that the US should focus on domestic issues instead.
The war between the US and Vietnam, commonly known as the Vietnam War, was a conflict that took place from 1955 to 1975. The war began as a result of the US's involvement in the Cold War and its policy of containing the spread of communism. The US provided military and economic support to the South Vietnamese government, which was fighting against communist forces in the North led by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army.
The war was marked by intense fighting, including guerilla warfare, bombing campaigns, and ground operations.
To know more about Vietnam War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4292602
#SPJ1
This mathematician is called the world's first computer programmer. he created the first programming language and wrote the first algorithms for the early computing machines. Who is this?
The mathematician who is called the world's first computer programmer, who created the first programming language and wrote the first algorithms for early computing machines was Ada Lovelace.
Ada Lovelace was an English mathematician and writer, born on December 10, 1815, and died on November 27, 1852. She is known for her work on Charles Babbage's proposed mechanical general-purpose computer, the Analytical Engine. She wrote the world's first algorithm for this machine.
Thus Ada Lovelace is known as the world's first computer programmer.
To know more about Ada Lovelace click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15128498
#SPJ11
which one of the following was not an act that was part of british mercantilism policy? group of answer choices the act of toleration molasses act iron act sugar act wool hat act
The Act of Toleration was not part of the British Mercantilism Policy. The Acts of Mercantilism Policy included the Sugar Act, Molasses Act, Iron Act, and Wool Hat Act.
Mercantilism was a European economic theory and practice during the 16th to 18th centuries, which was based on promoting the commercial interests of the nation. The theory of mercantilism holds that a nation's prosperity and economic power depend on its capacity to accumulate gold and silver and its ability to maintain a favorable balance of trade, wherein exports exceed imports.
Mercantilism was a doctrine that was embraced by the British Empire in the 17th and 18th centuries. It was a practical economic policy that aimed to create a favorable balance of trade, wherein exports exceeded imports. The mercantilist policies included: promoting exports over imports reducing imports through tariffs and quotas building a navy to protect trade and secure new markets establishing colonies to provide raw materials and markets for exports.
The Act of Toleration was not a part of the British mercantilism policy. Instead, the Act of Toleration was an Act of Parliament, which was passed in 1689. This Act granted freedom of worship to non-Anglican Protestants in England, though not to Catholics.
Know more about Mercantilism here:
https://brainly.com/question/30627832
#SPJ11
imagine yourself as winston smith at the beginning of 1984. what would you do to undermine the party? knowing what you know now, how would you extricate yourself from the fate that awaits you?
At the beginning of 1984, Winston Smith would attempt to undermine the Party in any way he could.
He would likely attempt to find someone who is also an enemy of the Party and form an alliance. He could also spread any anti-Party ideas he finds, as well as finding ways to disrupt the Party's systems.
Knowing what he knows now, Winston would attempt to flee the country or find some way to hide from the Party. He could also attempt to form a larger resistance movement against the Party and unite the people against them.
Overall, Winston would try to find a way to avoid the fate that awaits him and actively fight back against the Party.
To know more about resistance movement click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/16286343#
#SPJ11
what was one policy the allied powers adopted when occupying germany after world war 2
I'm pretty sure it's the removal of 1945 German flag or the nazi flag.
has there only ever been one view of gender and sexuality throughout history, or one traditional view, and how do we know?
The view of gender-sexuality throughout history has not been constant. Over time, it has changed considerably.
Early societies had various views on gender and sexuality that differed from contemporary societies. Gender is a social construct that involves behaviors and characteristics that society associates with men and women. It is a cultural distinction, while biological differences are used to define sex. The way gender is seen in society varies from one place to another, and it has evolved significantly over time.
Sexuality is a human trait that is linked to both physical and emotional pleasure. It refers to the way people experience, express, and explore their sexual desires. Sexuality varies from individual to individual and can be influenced by factors like age, culture, gender identity, and more.The traditional view on gender and sexuality has changed over time. The way it is perceived in modern society is not the same as how it was viewed in the past.
In ancient times, there were various beliefs and myths regarding gender and sexuality that are different from today’s views. The most famous example is the belief that homosexuality was unnatural or immoral. Many cultures and societies throughout history were against same-sex relationships. On the other hand, some cultures embraced homosexuality and saw it as a normal part of life.
In conclusion, the view of gender and sexuality throughout history has not been constant. It has changed over time, and our modern view of gender and sexuality is not the only one that has ever existed.
To know more about gender-sexuality, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30845339#
#SPJ11