What statistical test would perform to test your hypothesis: average time to deliver pizza, once the order is placed, is greater than 25 minutes in the population.
Z-test
T-test
No test is necessary
ANOVA

According to current fiscal policy theory, the best decision to help end a recession in the United States would be to increase government spending. This is based on the Keynesian theory that during a recession, there is a lack of aggregate demand in the economy, and government spending can help stimulate demand and encourage economic growth.

By increasing government spending on infrastructure, education, and other public services, it can create jobs, increase consumer spending, and boost economic activity. Additionally, the government can also implement tax cuts, which can give consumers more disposable income to spend and also stimulate demand.

However, it's important to note that the effectiveness of fiscal policy in ending a recession can be influenced by various factors such as the magnitude of the recession, the timing of the policy implementation, and the government's ability to finance the policy measures. Therefore, policymakers need to carefully consider all of these factors and adjust their decisions accordingly.
According to current fiscal policy theory, the best decision to help end a recession in the United States would involve implementing expansionary fiscal measures. This typically includes increasing government spending, cutting taxes, or a combination of both, which in turn stimulates economic activity and growth.

Expansionary fiscal policy works by injecting more money into the economy, which increases aggregate demand. This leads to higher levels of output and employment, eventually helping to alleviate the negative effects of a recession. Increased government spending can come in various forms, such as investments in infrastructure, public services, or direct financial assistance to individuals and businesses. Tax cuts provide more disposable income for consumers and lower costs for businesses, promoting spending and investment.

To implement these decisions, policymakers need to consider various factors, such as the severity of the recession, the level of public debt, and the effectiveness of specific fiscal measures in achieving the desired outcomes. It is essential to strike the right balance to avoid causing inflation or exacerbating long-term fiscal imbalances.

In conclusion, current fiscal policy theory suggests that the best decision to help end a recession in the United States involves implementing expansionary fiscal measures, such as increasing government spending and cutting taxes. These actions stimulate economic growth and alleviate the negative impacts of a recession, ultimately contributing to economic recovery.

Learn more about investments at : brainly.com/question/14682309

#SPJ11

The expected number of rolls needed to generate a number below 1/2 is 1.5, which is rounded to 2.

If we pick a random number between 0 and 1 and generate the next number to be at most the previous number, then the expected number of rolls until the generated number is below 1/2 is 2.

To see why, consider the following strategy:

Roll the die once to generate the first number, X1.

If X1 < 1/2, stop.

Otherwise, continue rolling the die until the generated number is below X1.

Once the generated number is below X1, stop.

Let Y be the number of rolls needed to complete this strategy. If X1 < 1/2, then Y = 1, since we stop immediately. Otherwise, we know that X2 < X1, X3 < X2, and so on until we reach a number Xn < Xn-1 < ... < X2 < X1 that is below 1/2. Thus, we need at least n - 1 additional rolls to complete the strategy.

To find the expected value of Y, we can use the law of total probability:

E(Y) = P(X1 < 1/2) × E(Y | X1 < 1/2) + P(X1 ≥ 1/2) × E(Y | X1 ≥ 1/2)

Since the first roll is uniformly distributed between 0 and 1, we have P(X1 < 1/2) = 1/2 and P(X1 ≥ 1/2) = 1/2.

If X1 < 1/2, then Y = 1, so E(Y | X1 < 1/2) = 1.

If X1 ≥ 1/2, then we need to roll the die until we get a number below X1. Since X1 is uniformly distributed between 1/2 and 1, the expected value of X1 is 3/4. Thus, by the memoryless property of the geometric distribution, the expected number of rolls needed to generate a number below X1 is 2. Therefore, E(Y | X1 ≥ 1/2) = 2.

Substituting these values into the formula for E(Y), we get:

E(Y) = (1/2) × 1 + (1/2) × 2 = 1.5

Therefore, the expected number of rolls needed to generate a number below 1/2 is 1.5, which is rounded to 2.

To learn more about expected number visit: https://brainly.com/question/23915989

#SPJ11

To ensure that the error is less than 0.0000001, we need to compute at least the first 6 terms of the series. This will give us a partial sum that is within 0.0000001 of the actual sum.

(a) The ratio of successive terms of the series is:

[tex]|a[n+1]/a[n]| = |(-1)^(n+1)*(n+2)/(n+1)(1/2)|[/tex]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

[tex]|a[n+1]/a[n]| = (n+2)/(2(n+1))[/tex]

(b) To evaluate the limit of this expression as n approaches infinity, we can divide the numerator and denominator by n:

[tex]|a[n+1]/a[n]| = [(n/n)(1+2/n)] / [(2/n)(1+1/n)][/tex]

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we get:

[tex]lim n- > ∞ |a[n+1]/a[n]| = lim n- > ∞ [(n/n)(1+2/n)] / [(2/n)(1+1/n)[/tex]]

= 1/2

Therefore, the limit of the ratio of successive terms is 1/2.

(c) Since the limit of the ratio of successive terms is less than 1, by the ratio test, the series ? + 2 converges.

To approximate the alternating series Σα, = 0. 45 - (0. 45) (0. 45) (0. 45) 31 +. 5! 7! within 0.0000001 of the convergent value, we need to determine how many terms of the series we need to compute. We can use the alternating series error bound theorem to estimate the error:

|Rn| <= |an+1|

where Rn is the error term (the difference between the nth partial sum and the actual sum), and an+1 is the first neglected term in the series.

To find the first neglected term, we can look at the pattern of the series:

a0 = 0.45

a1 = -0.2025

a2 = 0.025641

a3 = -0.0007716

a4 = 0.00003857

a5 = -0.00000298

The absolute value of the terms is decreasing, so the error is bounded by the absolute value of the first neglected term. In this case, the first neglected term is a6 = 0.00000025.

Therefore, to ensure that the error is less than 0.0000001, we need to compute at least the first 6 terms of the series. This will give us a partial sum that is within 0.0000001 of the actual sum.

To know more about   Equations, here

https://brainly.com/question/22688504

#SPJ4

The exponential function of base e whose derivative at x=3 is 2y=e^(ax-b) is y = e^(4x - 5).

To create an exponential function of base e using the digits 1-6 at most one time each, with the condition that its derivative at x=3 is 2.

Given the function y = e^(ax-b), let's find its derivative:

1. Differentiate the function with respect to x: dy/dx = a * e^(ax-b)
2. Plug in x = 3 and set dy/dx = 2: 2 = a * e^(3a-b)

Now, we need to find the values of a and b using the digits 1-6, at most one time each. Let's use a = 4 and b = 5, as they seem reasonable and satisfy the single-use condition:

2 = 4 * e^(12 - 5)
2 = 4 * e^7

Now divide both sides by 4:
2/4 = e^7
1/2 = e^7

So, our exponential function using the digits 1-6 at most one time each and satisfying the given condition is                    y = e^(4x - 5).

Know more about derivative here:

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11

Answer:

Jonah used $17.50 (14% of $125) to buy music on iTunes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1/6561

Step-by-Step Explanation:

you get 1/6561 when you simplify 9^-4

The degree measure of the larger angle is 50⁰.

Complementary angles are two angles whose sum is 90 degrees.

So we have two angles; let the smaller angle = x

then bigger angle = (x + 10)

The two angles will add up to 90 degrees;

x + (x + 10) = 90

2x + 10 = 90

2x = 90 - 10

2x = 80

x = 80/2

x = 40⁰

The measure of the larger angle = 40⁰ + 10⁰ = 50⁰

Learn more about complementary angles here: https://brainly.com/question/1358595

#SPJ1

Based on the information, the side length of square 4 = a + b and the side length of square 5 = a + b

The 4 sides of a square are usually the same ;

Hence, each side is called the side length ; from the diagram attached :

Side length of square 4 = a + b

Side length of square 5 = a + b

If the side lengths are equal ; that is (a + b) ; the the area which is the square of the side length will also be the same.

Learn more about square on

https://brainly.com/question/23700096

#SPJ1

The Length of CD is 27.875 cm.

We have,

AB=24 cm, BD= 17 cm, AD = 13 cm

and, ACD=90Degrees

Using Pythagoras theorem

AD² = AC² + CD²

13² = AC² + (x-17)²

169 = AC² + x² + 289 - 34x

- x² + 34x - 120 = AC²

AC² = (x-4)(x-30)

Again,

AB² = AC² + CB²

24² = (x-4)(x-30) + x²

576 =  - x² + 34x - 120 + x²

34x = 696

x= 10.875

Thus, the length of CD is

= 10.875 + 17

= 37.875 cm

Learn more about Pythagoras theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

i) The equation in vertex form is f(x) = (x - 2)² - 1.

ii) The vertex of the parabola is (2, -1).

iii)The x-intercepts are (1, 0) and (3, 0) and the y-intercept is (0, 3).

b. The quadratic function is: f(x) = (1/8)(x + 3)² + 2.

A quadratic function is a function of form f(x) = ax² + bx + c, where a, b, and c are constants and a ≠ 0. The graph of a quadratic function is a U-shaped curve called a parabola.

The vertex of a parabola is the point where the parabola changes direction. It lies on the axis of symmetry, which is a vertical line that divides the parabola into two equal halves.

Here we have

The parabola f(x) = x² - 4x +3

a. Consider the parabola f(x) = x^2 - 4x + 3

i) To write the equation in vertex form, we complete the square:

f(x) = x² - 4x + 3

= (x² - 4x + 4) - 1

= (x - 2)² - 1

Therefore, the equation in vertex form is f(x) = (x - 2)² - 1.

ii) The vertex of the parabola is (2, -1). The axis of symmetry is the vertical line passing through the vertex, which is x = 2.

iii) To find the x-intercepts, we set f(x) = 0:

(x - 2)² - 1 = 0

(x - 2)² = 1

x - 2 = ±1

x = 1, 3

Therefore, the x-intercepts are (1, 0) and (3, 0).

To find the y-intercept, we set x = 0:

f(0) = 0² - 4(0) + 3 = 3

Therefore, the y-intercept is (0, 3).

b. To write the quadratic function for the parabola that has vertex (-3, 2) and passes through (1, 4), we use the vertex form of the quadratic equation:

f(x) = a(x - h)² + k,

where (h, k) is the vertex.

Substituting the given values, we get:

f(x) = a(x + 3)² + 2

To find the value of a, we substitute the point (1, 4) into the equation:

4 = a(1 + 3)² + 2

2 = 16a

a = 1/8

Therefore,

i) The equation in vertex form is f(x) = (x - 2)² - 1.

ii) The vertex of the parabola is (2, -1).

iii)The x-intercepts are (1, 0) and (3, 0) and the y-intercept is (0, 3).

b. The quadratic function is: f(x) = (1/8)(x + 3)² + 2.

Learn more about Parabolas at

https://brainly.com/question/31142122

#SPJ4

A.i. The equation in vertex form is f(x) = (x - 2)² - 1.

ii. The axis of symmetry is the vertical line passing through the vertex, which is x = 2.

iii. The x-intercepts are x = 1 and x = 3. The y-intercept is y = 3.

B. The quadratic function for the parabola is:

f(x) = (1/8)(x + 3)^2 + 2.

a.

i) To write the equation in vertex form, we need to complete the square. The general vertex form of a parabola is given by f(x) = a(x - h)² + k, where (h, k) represents the vertex.

Let's complete the square for the given parabola f(x) = x² - 4x + 3:

f(x) = x² - 4x + 3

= (x² - 4x + 4) - 4 + 3 [Adding and subtracting (4/2)² = 4 to complete the square]

= (x - 2)² - 1

So, the equation in vertex form is f(x) = (x - 2)² - 1.

ii) Comparing the equation f(x) = (x - 2)² - 1 with the vertex form f(x) = a(x - h)² + k, we can see that the vertex is (h, k) = (2, -1). The axis of symmetry is the vertical line passing through the vertex, which is x = 2.

iii) To find the x-intercepts, set f(x) = 0 and solve for x:

(x - 2)² - 1 = 0

(x - 2)² = 1

x - 2 = ±√1

x - 2 = ±1

x = 2 ± 1

So, the x-intercepts are x = 1 and x = 3.

To find the y-intercept, set x = 0 in the equation:

f(0) = (0 - 2)² - 1

= (-2)² - 1

= 4 - 1

= 3

So, the y-intercept is y = 3.

b.

To write the quadratic function for the parabola with a vertex at (-3, 2) and passing through (1, 4), use the vertex form of a parabola.

The vertex form of a parabola is f(x) = a(x - h)² + k, where (h, k) represents the vertex.

Using the given vertex (-3, 2):

h = -3 and k = 2.

Substituting the values of h and k:

f(x) = a(x - (-3))² + 2

= a(x + 3)² + 2

Now, use the point (1, 4) to find the value of 'a'.

Substituting x = 1 and f(x) = 4 in the equation:

4 = a(1 + 3)² + 2

4 = a(4²) + 2

4 = 16a + 2

16a = 4 - 2

16a = 2

a = 2/16

a = 1/8

Therefore, the quadratic function for the parabola is: f(x) = (1/8)(x + 3)² + 2.

learn more about quadratic function: https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ4

To find the critical numbers of the function f(x) = x^3e^(-9x), we need to find the values of x where the derivative of the function is equal to zero or does not exist. These values correspond to the relative maxima, minima, or inflection points of the function.

To find the derivative of the function, we can use the product rule and the chain rule of differentiation. The derivative of f(x) is given by:

f'(x) = 3x^2e^(-9x) - 9x^3e^(-9x)

To find the critical numbers, we need to set f'(x) equal to zero and solve for x:

3x^2e^(-9x) - 9x^3e^(-9x) = 0

Factorizing out e^(-9x), we get:

3x^2 - 9x^3 = 0

Simplifying further, we get:

x^2(3 - 9x) = 0

Thus, the critical numbers of the function are x = 0 and x = 1/3. At x = 0, the function has a relative minimum, while at x = 1/3, the function has a relative maximum. To determine the nature of these critical points, we can use the second derivative test or examine the sign of the derivative in the intervals around the critical points.

Overall, finding the critical numbers of a function is an important step in analyzing its behavior and determining its extrema or points of inflection. By setting the derivative equal to zero and solving for x, we can identify the critical points and then use additional tests or analysis to determine their nature and significance.

To learn more about Derivatives, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11

Answer: Another simple way to help get the tears flowing is by yawning. “Try yawning a few times in a row to wake up the tear ducts. This may be helpful ...

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation that can be used to calculate Willy the whale's position relative to sea level.

Question Blank 1 of 4; -245, Question Blank 2 of 4; -83, Question Blank 3 of 4; +103, Question Blank 4 of 4; -225

The sea level is the level of the sea, which is taken as the zero mark on the number line.

The level of Willy the whale below sea level = 245 feet

The level Willy the whale descends = 83 feet

The level wheely the whale ascends = 103 feet

Therefore, the level to which Willy the whale starts = -245 feet

The level Willy the whale descends to = (-245 - 83) feet = -328 feet

The level to which Willy the whale then ascends to = -328 feet + 103 feet = -225 feet

The equation to calculate the position of Willy the whale is therefore;

-245 - 83 + 103 = -225

Learn more on number line here: https://brainly.com/question/29209997

#SPJ1

The image of point A after it is dilated with a scale factor 3 is (6, 12)

Dilation is a transformation, which is used to resize the object.

A scale factor is when you enlarge a shape and each side is multiplied by the same number. This number is called the scale factor.

Let the coordinates of A are (2, 4)

We have to find the coordinates of point A after dilation with scale factor 3

A'=(3×2, 3×4)

=(6, 12)

Hence,  the image of point A after it is dilated with a scale factor 3 is (6, 12)

To learn more on Graph click:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ1

Is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean price of the shares in the month is different from 165.

To test whether the mean price of the shares in the month is 165, we will perform a one-sample t-test.

The null hypothesis H0: μ = 165, where μ is the true population mean price of the shares in the month.

The alternative hypothesis Ha: μ ≠ 165.

We will use a significance level of α = 0.05.

First, we will calculate the sample mean and sample standard deviation:

sample mean (x) = (163 + 163 + 164 + 164 + 165 + 169 + 170 + 171) / 9 = 166.11

sample standard deviation (s) = √[((163-166.11)² + (163-166.11)² + (164-166.11)² + (164-166.11)² + (165-166.11)² + (169-166.11)² + (170-166.11)² + (171-166.11)²) / (9-1)] = 2.791

Next, we will calculate the t-statistic:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √n) = (166.11 - 165) / (2.791 / √9) = 1.441

Using a t-table or a calculator, we find that the p-value associated with a t-statistic of 1.441 and 8 degrees of freedom is approximately 0.186.

Since the p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean price of the shares in the month is different from 165.

To learn more about different visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30461754

#SPJ11

Answer:

To create a matrix for this linear system, we can arrange the coefficients of the variables and the constants into a matrix as follows:

| 1 3 2 | | x | | 26 |

| 1 -3 4 | x | y | = | 2 |

| 2 1 1 | | z | | 8 |

To solve the system using row reduction, we can perform elementary row operations to transform the matrix into row echelon form or reduced row echelon form. I will use the latter approach for simplicity:

| 1 0 0 | | x | | 6 |

| 0 1 0 | x | y | = | 5 |

| 0 0 1 | | z | | -1 |

Therefore, the solution to the system is x = 6, y = 5, and z = -1.

The GCF of 20xyz and 30x^2z is: 2*5*x*z = 10xz

To find the greatest common factor (GCF) of 20xyz and 30x^2z, we can factor out the common factors that they share.

Identifying the common factors in the two monomials:

20xyz = 2 * 2 * 5 * x * y * z

30x^2z = 2 * 3 * 5 * x * x * z

The GCF is the product of the common factors raised to the lowest power that they appear in both monomials.

Therefore, the GCF of 20xyz and 30x^2z is:

2 * 5 * x * z = 10xz

Learn more about GCF at https://brainly.com/question/219464

#SPJ1

Mary needs to score 96 on the fifth test to raise her average test score from 92.25 to 93.

Let's use the formula for the mean

mean = (sum of all scores) / (number of scores)

We can rearrange this formula to solve for the sum of all scores

sum of all scores = mean x number of scores

We know that Mary's mean test score is currently 92.25 and she has taken four tests, so

sum of all scores = 92.25 x 4 = 369

To raise her mean test score to 93, Mary needs the sum of all five test scores to be

sum of all scores = 93 x 5 = 465

To find out what score Mary needs to earn on the fifth test, we can subtract the sum of her first four test scores from the required sum of all five test scores

score on fifth test = sum of all five tests - sum of first four tests

score on fifth test = 465 - 369

score on fifth test = 96

Therefore, Mary needs to earn a score of 96 on the fifth test in order to raise her mean test score to 93.

To know more about mean:

https://brainly.com/question/18433095

#SPJ1

The derivative of the vertical position of the pumpkin trajectory with respect to its horizontal position is 2ax, as given by option b.

To find the position of maximum height of the pumpkin, the students need to find the point where the derivative of the vertical position with respect to the horizontal position is equal to zero. Setting 2ax equal to zero and solving for x, we get x=0. This means that the pumpkin reaches its maximum height at x=0, or in other words, at the point where it is launched from the trebuchet.

To find the value of the maximum height, we can substitute x=0 into the original equation for the pumpkin's trajectory. This gives us y(0) = b, which means that the maximum height of the pumpkin is b units.

The derivative of the vertical position of the pumpkin trajectory with respect to its horizontal position is 2ax because the derivative of ax^2 with respect to x is 2ax. This means that the rate of change of the pumpkin's height with respect to its horizontal position is proportional to 2ax. When x is zero, the derivative is also zero, which indicates that the pumpkin has reached its maximum height at that point.

This is because at the maximum height, the rate of change of height with respect to horizontal distance is zero. Finally, we find the value of the maximum height by substituting x=0 into the equation for the pumpkin's trajectory.

Learn more about derivative:

brainly.com/question/29144258

#SPJ11

(a) According to Neyman-Pearson's lemma, the rejection region of the type I error rate (α) for testing H0: θ = θ0 against HA: θ = θA, where θ0 < θA, is given by:

{X: f(x; θA) / f(x; θ0) > k}

where f(x; θ) is the probability mass function (PMF) of the distribution of the data, given the parameter θ, and k is chosen such that the type I error rate is α.

For this problem, we have H0: p = 0 and HA: p > 0.4, with α = 0.05. Therefore, we need to find the value of k such that P(X ∈ R | H0) = α, where R is the rejection region.

Using the fact that X follows a binomial distribution with n trials and success probability p, we have:

f(x; p) = (n choose x) * p^x * (1-p)^(n-x)

Then, the likelihood ratio is:

L(x) = f(x; pA) / f(x; p0) = (pA / p0)^x * (1-pA / 1-p0)^(n-x)

We want to find k such that:

P(X ∈ R | p = p0) = P(L(X) > k | p = p0) = α

Using the distribution of L(X) under H0, we have:

P(L(X) > k | p = p0) = P(X > k') = 1 - Φ(k')

where Φ is the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of a standard normal distribution, and k' is the value of k that satisfies:

(1 - pA / 1 - p0)^(n-x) = k'

k' can be found using the fact that X ~ Bin(n, p0) and P(X > k') = α, which yields:

k' = qbinom(α, n, 1-pA/1-p0)

Therefore, the rejection region R is given by:

R = {X: X > qbinom(α, n, 1-pA/1-p0)}

(b) We have n = 20, p0 = 0.45, pA = 0.65, and X = 11. Using the rejection region R defined in part (a), we have:

R = {X: X > qbinom(0.05, 20, 1-0.65/1-0.45)} = {X: X > 12}

Since X = 11 is not in R, we fail to reject H0 at the 5% level of significance.

(c) The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as the one computed from the data, assuming H0 is true. For this problem, the test statistic is X = 11, and we want to find the probability of observing a value as extreme or more extreme than 11, under the null hypothesis H0: p = 0. Using the binomial distribution with p = 0.45, we have:

p-value = P(X >= 11 | p = 0) = 1 - P(X <= 10 | p = 0)

= 1 - pbinom(10, 20, 0.45)

= 0.151

Therefore, the p-value is 0.151, which is greater than the level of significance α = 0.05, so we fail to reject H0.

Answer:

If the mean amount of money that students from the university spend on a first date is $100, the probability is 0.026 that a randomly selected group of 32 students from the university would spend a mean of $92.23 or less on their most recent first dates.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let help you with that.

To find the distance between two points, we can use the distance formula:

```

d = √(x2 - x1)2 + (y2 - y1)2

```

Where:

* `d` is the distance between the two points

* `x1` and `y1` are the coordinates of the first point

* `x2` and `y2` are the coordinates of the second point

In this case, the points are (8, -4) and (-1, -2):

```

d = √((8 - (-1))^2 + ((-4) - (-2))^2)

```

```

d = √(9^2 + (-2)^2)

```

```

d = √(81 + 4)

```

```

d = √85

```

```

d = 9.2 (rounded to the nearest tenth)

```

Therefore, the distance between the two points is 9.2 units.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Both sets (a) and (b) are compact because they are closed and bounded.

To prove that each of the following sets is compact, we will show that they are both closed and bounded.

For set (a), which is a finite set {(a1, ..., an)} ⊂ R:

1. Closed: A finite set is closed because it contains all its limit points. In a finite set, every point is isolated, meaning that no point is a limit point. Therefore, the set is closed.
2. Bounded: Since the set is finite, we can find a minimum and a maximum value among its elements. By defining an interval [min, max], we can show that the set is bounded.

For set (b), which is the set {arctan(n): n ∈ N} ∪ {π/2}:

1. Closed: The set of arctan(n) has a limit point at π/2 as n approaches infinity. However, π/2 is included in the set, so it contains all its limit points and is closed.
2. Bounded: The arctan function has a horizontal asymptote at π/2 as n approaches infinity, and the minimum value of the set is arctan(1). Therefore, the set is bounded by the interval [arctan(1), π/2].

Learn more about closed sets: https://brainly.com/question/13458417

#SPJ11

The probability that no more than 6 women dislike their mother-in-law is very low, at 0.00002

We can model the number of women who dislike their mother-in-law out of a sample of 9 married women using a binomial distribution with parameters n=9 and p=0.85.

(a)   [tex]P(all 9 women dislike their mother-in-law) = (0.85)^9 = 0.322[/tex]

(b) [tex]P(none of the 9 women dislike their mother-in-law) = (1-0.85)^9 = 0.0001[/tex]

(c) P(at least one woman dislikes her mother-in-law) = 1 - P(none of the 9 women dislike their mother-in-law) = 1 - 0.0001 = 0.9999

(d) P(no more than 6 women dislike their mother-in-law) = P(X <= 6) where X follows a binomial distribution with parameters n=9 and p=0.85. We can use a calculator or binomial distribution table to find:

P(X <= 6) = 0.00002

Therefore, the probability that no more than 6 women dislike their mother-in-law is very low, at 0.00002.

To know more about "Probability" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The simple interest after 30 months is $924. 375

To determine the simple interest value, we need to know the formula for calculating it

The formula for simple interest is represented as;

S.I =PRT/100

The parameters of the equation are;

From the information given, we have;

Substitute the values

Simple interest = 8500 × 2.5 × 4.35/100

Multiply the values

Simple interest = 92437.5/100

Divide the values

Simple interest = $924. 375

Learn more about simple interest at: https://brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ1

Yes it should be surface area

Answer:

4!/(2!2!) = 6

There are 6 possible ways that 2 of the 4 dice will land on six.

6(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(5/6) = 25/216 = .116

B is correct.

P(T < 50) = 0.3202 * 0.5 + 0.102 * 0.5 = 0.2111

Finally, substituting all these values into Bayes' theorem, we get:

P(T < 50 | T = 50 or 75) = 0

a) To solve this problem, we need to use the properties of the lognormal distribution. Specifically, we know that if T is a lognormal distribution with mean μ and coefficient of variation σ, then ln(T) has a normal distribution with mean ln(μ) and standard deviation σ.

Using this, we can standardize the distribution of ln(T) as follows:

z = (ln(50) - ln(75)) / (0.4 * ln(10))

where ln(10) is the natural logarithm of 10.

We can then use a standard normal distribution table (or a calculator) to find the probability that z is less than or equal to this value.

P(T < 50) = P(ln(T) < ln(50)) = P(z < -0.468) = 0.3202

Therefore, the probability of an earthquake occurring in the next 50 years is approximately 0.3202.

b) Similarly, to find the probability of an earthquake occurring in the next 50 years given that the last earthquake occurred 75 years ago, we standardize the distribution of ln(T) using:

z = (ln(50) - ln(75)) / (0.4 * ln(10))

But this time, we need to adjust the mean by subtracting ln(75) and adding ln(75+75) = ln(150) to account for the time since the last earthquake.

z = (ln(50) - ln(75+75)) / (0.4 * ln(10)) = -1.272

Again, using a standard normal distribution table (or calculator), we find that:

P(T < 50 | T = 75) = P(ln(T) < ln(50) | ln(T) = ln(75)) = P(z < -1.272) = 0.102

Therefore, the probability of an earthquake occurring in the next 50 years given that the last earthquake occurred 75 years ago is approximately 0.102.

c) To find the probability of an earthquake occurring in the next 50 years, given that the last earthquake occurred either 50 or 75 years ago with equal probability, we need to use Bayes' theorem:

P(T < 50 | T = 50 or 75) = P(T = 50 or 75 | T < 50) * P(T < 50) / P(T = 50 or 75)

where P(T = 50 or 75) = 0.5 (since the two cases are equally likely).

To find P(T = 50 or 75 | T < 50), we can use the law of total probability:

P(T < 50) = P(T < 50 | T = 50) * P(T = 50) + P(T < 50 | T = 75) * P(T = 75)

where P(T = 50) = P(T = 75) = 0.5 (since the two cases are equally likely).

From parts a) and b), we know that:

P(T < 50 | T = 50) = 0.3202

P(T < 50 | T = 75) = 0.102

Substituting these values, we get

P(T < 50) = 0.3202 * 0.5 + 0.102 * 0.5 = 0.2111

Finally, substituting all these values into Bayes' theorem, we get:

P(T < 50 | T = 50 or 75) = 0

To learn more about distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29731222

#SPJ11