What was the result of the Korean War?

Answer:

the civil war

Explanation:

No Man's Land was first occupied by Native American tribes, after which it was declared public land, used by cowboys and cattle ranchers, and finally included in the state of Oklahoma.

southwestern Oklahoma-

The Oklahoma Panhandle, historically known as No Man's Land, the Public Land Strip, the Neutral Strip, or Cimarron Territory, is a salient in the far northwest of the U.S. state of Oklahoma and is made up, from west to east, of the counties of Cimarron, Texas, and Beaver.

Leaders of the Five Tribes met at the Sequoyah Convention in Muskogee in August 1905 to prepare a constitution and a memorial urging Congress to grant I.T. separate statehood after realizing that their governments would soon dissolve.

To know more about Tribes visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20058374

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. The U.S. Constitution gives the president the power to pardon under Article II, Section 2, which states that the president "shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment."

2. The Constitutional power granted to the president to pardon can be changed only through a constitutional amendment, which requires approval from two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, as well as ratification by three-fourths of the states.

3. A pardon is an executive order by the president that forgives a person convicted of a federal crime, releasing the person from the punishment and consequences of the crime. A commutation is an executive order by the president that reduces or eliminates the sentence of a person convicted of a federal crime, but does not forgive the crime itself.

(Shorter response for 3): Pardon is the forgiveness of a crime and the cancellation of the penalty or punishment associated with it. Commutation is the reduction or lessening of a sentence for a crime, typically from a more severe to a less severe punishment.

4. The president cannot pardon someone for a state crime or civil liability, and cannot use the pardon power to obstruct justice or commit a crime. The pardon power is also subject to the limitation that it can only be used for federal crimes, and only after the person has been convicted of the crime.

5. The Department of Justice has a role in the pardon process, as it is responsible for reviewing and investigating pardon applications, making recommendations to the president, and preparing the final paperwork for the president's signature. However, the president has the final authority to grant or deny a pardon.

6. President George W. Bush pardoned 189 people and commuted the sentences of 11 people.

7. President George W. Bush commuted the sentence of Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who was convicted of obstruction of justice, perjury, and making false statements in connection with the investigation into the leak of a CIA agent's identity. He also commuted the sentences of Jose A. Compean and Ignacio Ramos, two border patrol agents who were convicted of shooting an unarmed suspect and covering up the incident.

8. President Obama pardoned 212 and commuted the sentence of 1705 people.

9. President Obama commuted the sentence of Chelsea Manning, who was convicted of violating the Espionage Act and other offenses for leaking classified documents to WikiLeaks. He also pardoned James Cartwright, a retired general who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI during an investigation into the leaking of classified information about a secret cyberattack on Iran's nuclear program.

10. President Trump pardoned 237 and commuted the sentence of 94 people.

11. President Trump pardoned Joseph Arpaio, a former Arizona sheriff who was convicted of criminal contempt of court for disobeying a court order to stop racial profiling practices. He also pardoned Michael Flynn, his former national security advisor who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials during the 2016 election.

12. President Biden has not yet issued any pardons or commutations as of March 2023.

Hope this helps! Sorry if it doesn't. If you need more help, ask me! :]

Lydia Maria Child was an American abolitionist, women's rights activist, and author who spoke out against the capital punishment.

Capital punishment, also known as death penalty, is legal process where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for crime they have committed. This sentence is usually reserved for the most serious crimes, such as murder, treason, or espionage. The methods used for carrying out capital punishment vary by country and can include methods such as lethal injection, electrocution, gas chambers, hanging, or firing squad. Supporters of capital punishment argue that it is a necessary deterrent for serious crimes, while opponents argue that it is morally wrong and can result in the execution of innocent people. The use of capital punishment is a highly debated topic around the world, with some countries having abolished it, while others continue to use it.

To learn more about treason, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11441798

#SPJ9

Answer:

A lawmaker's political affiliation often influences their vote on legislative issues. This occurs because political parties represent different ideologies and interests, and lawmakers generally align with a particular party's platform and agenda. Lawmakers often share similar political beliefs and values with their party, which affects their stance on policy issues. Additionally, political parties have a significant influence on the legislative process, including committee assignments, bill sponsorship, and voting strategy. Party leadership also plays a role in shaping a lawmaker's vote by encouraging them to vote along party lines. Furthermore, party loyalty can affect a lawmaker's chances of re-election and their standing within their party. Overall, a lawmaker's political affiliation is a key factor in how they vote on legislative issues.

This occurs because political parties are formed around a set of shared values, beliefs, and policy positions. Lawmakers who belong to a particular party generally share these values and beliefs, and are expected to vote in line with the party's positions on policy issues. This is often reinforced by party leaders, who use a variety of tactics to ensure that party members vote as a bloc on key issues. Additionally, lawmakers may be subject to pressure from interest groups, constituents, and other stakeholders who are aligned with their party, further reinforcing the importance of voting along party lines. Ultimately, the expectation that lawmakers will vote in line with their party's positions on key issues is a key aspect of the American political system, and can be seen as a way of promoting political stability and consistency in government decision-making.

Hope this helps you! Sorry if it doesn't. :]

The division of labor is constrained by the size of the market, according to a famous statement made by Adam Smith in The Accumulation of Nations.This is so that each people can specialize in their line of work while still having a choice of a broad range of products and services.

Yet, Adam Smith's explanation of the labor distribution as a mechanism for generating wealth and market systems that use self-interest as just a fuel for that mechanism were combined in his book The Wealth of Nations.He claimed that growing division of labor was the fundamental driver of wealth.

He argued that since he believed that distance and natural barriers were the only constraints on market trading, governmental policy should not erect further man-made barriers to it.As a result, he generally supported his position that governments should support "free trade."

To know more about products and services visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13499657

#SPJ1

Answer:reducing the influence of the boyars, or the feudal elite class.

Explanation:

He did this by imposing taxes and services on them as well as introducing comprehensive administrative reforms that opened civil service to commoners.

Answer:

Bolívar believed that South Americans were not ready for a republican form of government because they had been "harassed by a conduct" that had deprived them of their political rights and kept them in a state of "permanent infancy" with regard to public affairs. He also noted that Americans living within the Spanish system were no better than serfs destined for labor, which suggests that the social and economic conditions in South America were not conducive to the establishment of a republic. Despite his desire for perfection in the government of his country, Bolívar recognized that the New World was not yet ready to be organized as a great republic.

Hope this helps! If not, I'm sorry! If you need more help, ask me! :]

Option (A) is accurate; American music is well-liked in China as a result of the spread of American values and standards throughout the world via media, technology, and trade.

China, a socialist nation, bases its domestic policy on the needs of all its citizens. The best option for preserving the nation's interests and the welfare of its citizens is peaceful growth. A sizeable socialism nation from the East is China.

That is why throughout the history of ceramics, it progressively replaced pottery. Because it was first created in China, it is known as china in English, which completely explains how the fragile porcelain can serve as a symbol of China.

To know more about china visit :

https://brainly.com/question/1103101

#SPJ1

Answer: a court of limited jurisdiction

Explanation:

The court with jurisdiction over the adoption of a child by their adoptive parents would typically be a family court or an adoption court within the state or jurisdiction where the child resides. In the United States, each state has its own laws and procedures governing adoption, and the adoption process typically involves various legal steps, including the termination of the birth parents' parental rights, a home study to evaluate the prospective adoptive parents, and a finalization hearing where a judge will review the adoption petition and issue a final order of adoption. The specific court with jurisdiction may vary depending on the state and the circumstances of the adoption, but it will generally be a court that handles family law matters.

Answer:

family / juvenile court

Explanation:

The court with jurisdiction to finalize a child's adoption by their adoptive parents would typically be a family court or juvenile court in the state where the child resides. The specific court may vary depending on the state and local laws governing adoption proceedings, but in general, family or juvenile courts have jurisdiction over matters related to child welfare and adoption. These courts have the authority to review and approve or deny adoption petitions, to terminate parental rights, and to ensure that the adoption process is carried out in the best interests of the child.

Answer:

It's D! He felt like he had run out of other options.

Explanation:

In the story of Naaman in 2 Kings 5, Naaman is a powerful commander of the Aramean army who suffers from leprosy. Despite his power and wealth, he is unable to find a cure for his disease and becomes desperate. One of his servants suggests that he seek out the prophet Elisha in Israel, and Naaman eventually agrees to go. So, it was not because he was threatened by Israel's king, admired Elisha's work, or wanted to travel to Israel, but rather because he felt like he had run out of other options.

Hope this helps! Sorry if it's wrong. If you need more help, ask me! :]

As Robert E. Lee gave up at Appomattox Court House, the Civil War came to an end.

Robert E. Lee's surrender to Ulysses S. Grant on April 9, 1865, officially put an end to the Civil War, while other southern armies continued to give up until May. It is one of the most significant moments in American history.

The Confederate General Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia was surrendered to the Union General Ulysses S. Grant after the Battle of Appomattox Court House, which took place on April 9, 1865, close to the town of Appomattox Court House, Virginia.

To know more about Civil War visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11874600

#SPJ1

"Anti-Federalists" section of the article introduces a point of view that supports a weaker role for state powers.

The primary worry of the anti-federalist movement was that the new United States Constitution would establish a centralised federal government with excessive power and authority, endangering the freedoms and rights of both individuals and the states. They believed that the Constitution did not go far enough in defending individual liberties and that a powerful federal government would eventually turn into a despotic and oppressive institution. They asserted that the Constitution gave the executive branch excessive power and that the lack of a Bill of Rights would expose citizens to abuses by the government. Anti-federalists aimed to curtail the federal government's authority and increase state autonomy and self-governance.

To Know more about "Anti-Federalists" Visit:

brainly.com/question/29496480

#SPJ1

✓ It created a platform for civil rights and changed the cultural landscape of the US.

Answer:

(B) The U.S should be the first Western country to build a colonial empire.

Explanation:

During that point the United States was very aggressive with their foreign policies. They wanted control of strategic locations. Plus the U.S. is a democratic nation who fought the spread of communism.  

Answer:c

Explanation:

Answer: A

Explanation:

because It created a labor pool not tied to agriculture.

"John Locke's rule of thumb for how much natural property one may morally accumulate is known as the "Lockean proviso". This proviso states that an individual can appropriate natural resources as long as there is "enough, and as good left in common for others". In other words, an individual can acquire property from nature as long as there is still enough of that resource available for others to use and enjoy. This ensures that the acquisition of property does not harm others and does not lead to a situation where some people have too much while others have too little. The Lockean proviso is often cited as an important principle in debates about property rights and resource management." (ChatGPT, 2023)

Answer:

1. by listing each of the king’s crimes in a unique sentence to emphasize how he has abused his power

2.to defend the decision to separate from British rule

to emphasize the cruelty and oppression of the king’s rule

3.The actions of King George have made it necessary for America to reject British rule.

4.He believes America’s only recourse is to declare war on the British.

5.“What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: It is dearness only that gives every thing its value.”

“Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”

6. He has no interest in political power.

7. No- After being away for so long, Washington longs to return home.

No – Fame and fortune motivate Washington to seek the presidency.

Yes- Washington’s strength and humility are unrivaled.

Yes – America has earned its freedom, thanks to Washington

Yes – Washington has made America a model for liberty around the world.

8. It emphasizes the author’s reverence for Washington.

9. The poems assert that Washington will inspire other nations to seek freedom.

“On other worlds he lights his fires: / Cold climes beneath his influence glow, / And frozen rivers learn to flow.”

“Fix'd are the eyes of nations on the scales, / For in their hopes Columbia's arm prevails.”

Explanation:

Enlightenment Idea: Natural Rights

Enlightenment Idea: The Social Contract

Enlightenment Idea: Balance of Power

Lastly, Enlightenment Idea: Separation of Church & State

Read more about French Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/1046744

#SPJ1

See text below



ENLIGHTENMENT LEADS TO REVOLUTION

Directions: The ideas that grew out of the Enlightenment had a direct influence on both the American and French Revolutions. In the table below explain how each idea affected each revolution.

Enlightenment Idea

Natural Rights

The Social Contract

Balance of Power Separation of Church

& State

AMERICAN

REVOLUTION

French

Revolution

Answer:

The Preamble to the Constitution states the following six general purposes:

To form a more perfect Union

To establish Justice

To insure domestic Tranquility

To provide for the common defense

To promote the general Welfare

To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity

Each of these purposes is important in its own right, and they are all interrelated. However, if I had to choose the most important purpose, I would choose "To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity." This purpose recognizes that the Constitution is not just about establishing a government, but also about securing the rights and freedoms of the people. Without liberty, the other purposes of the Constitution are essentially meaningless. The Constitution is a living document that has been able to adapt to changing times in part because it was founded on the principle of securing the blessings of liberty for all. This purpose ensures that our rights and freedoms are protected, and that we are free to pursue our own happiness without interference from the government or others.

Explanation:

According to the Browns, for education to be equitable, children from all racial backgrounds must attend the same school and have access to the same facilities and opportunities.

In the landmark case Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that American state laws requiring racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated institutions are otherwise of similar quality.

But Brown also had an unanticipated result, and the effects of that are still being felt today: it prompted a number of seasoned, highly trained black educators who worked in schools with only black children to resign, be demoted, or lose their jobs.

Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education: https://brainly.com/question/14637388

#SPJ1

Gore's and bush's positions on full public financing of federal elections is that Bush has expressed support for some aspects of campaign finance reform while Gore has argued that the influence of money in politics undermines democracy .

George W. Bush, who served as President of the United States from 2001 to 2009 and was the Republican Party nominee for President in 2000, has been less supportive of full public financing of federal elections. While Bush gives support for some aspects of campaign finance reform, he has also argued that restrictions on campaign spending can limit free speech and that public financing could discourage private donations and reduce the influence of political parties.

It is worth noting, however, that both Gore and Bush were running for President in 2000 and their positions may have evolved or changed since then. Additionally, campaign finance reform is a complex issue with many different proposals and potential approaches, so their positions may vary depending on the specific details of any given proposal.

Learn more about elections at:

https://brainly.com/question/25815264

#SPJ1

Answer: read the explanation

Explanation:

Key points

*    In the case McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court considered whether Congress had the power to create a national bank and whether the state of Maryland had interfered with congressional powers by taxing the national bank.

*     The Supreme Court ruled in favor of McCulloch and found that the state of Maryland had interfered with one of Congress’s implied powers.

Background of the case

After the founding of the United States, one of the first things the new government had to address was the debt the nation had incurred fighting the Revolutionary War. Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton came up with a plan to create the Bank of the United States, a national bank, in order to absorb state debts from the war and to create a national currency. But not everyone agreed that the federal government had the power to create a bank.

One of the bank’s most vocal opponents was Thomas Jefferson, who argued that it was not within the federal government’s explicit powers to create a national bank and that doing so was an overreach of federal power. Despite opposition to the bank, Congress passed the first charter of the Bank of the United States in 1791, granting it the power to operate for twenty years.

But when it came time to renew the bank’s charter in 1811, the measure was defeated in Congress by one vote. It would take another five years for Congress to pass the second charter of the Bank of the United States, but in 1816, the national bank was re-established. Once again, conflict flared over whether Congress had the power to create a national bank.

The government of Maryland did not want a national bank and did not want a branch in Maryland. Nevertheless, the branch opened in 1817. The state of Maryland decided to tax the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States in an effort to run it out of business.

The bank’s cashier, James W. McCulloch, refused to pay the tax. In response, the state of Maryland sued him. Both the state trial court and the state supreme court agreed that McCulloch had to pay the tax. McCulloch appealed to the US Supreme Court, which heard the case in 1819. hope this helped

Answer:

china

Explanation:

Answer:

True.

In April 1975, the North Vietnamese Army launched a major offensive against South Vietnam. This quickly brought down the South Vietnamese government and military forces. By April 30, 1975, North Vietnamese forces had taken over Saigon, the capital of South Vietnam, and forced the last South Vietnamese officials and the American embassy to leave the country. This event ended the Vietnam War and brought Vietnam back together under communist rule. The Fall of Saigon, as it is often called, was a big event in the history of the Vietnam War. It had big effects on both the US and Vietnam.