What was the source of conflict between the United States and Mexico before 1846?

Answer:

Annexation of Texas and more.

Explanation:

It stemmed from the annexation of the Republic of Texas by the U.S. in 1845 and from a dispute over whether Texas ended at the Nueces River (the Mexican claim) or the Rio Grande (the U.S. claim).

note: you can also look this up, it is likely much faster than using brainly.

х
Use context clues to define the word in italics below
Ancient civilizations are similar to our own because they depended on each other, just as we do now.
What does the word civilizations mean?
O A types of comnica
rication
OB. family characteristics
OC important buildings
OD highly developed society

2 How did the Treaty of Versailles contribute to World War II? A. Hitler resented the restrictions it placed on Germany and wanted to restore the country’s power. B. Hitler refused to pay the war reparations, which led to bad relations with France. C. Hitler took advantage of its terms to take over Czechoslovakia and consider further expansion. D. Hitler became victorious because the treaty allowed him to annex Sudetenland.

how does parliament now have more and more people from different backgrounds

A
23 Who was the most well-known Texas Ranger that served in the Mexican War?
Sam Houston
Robert S. Neighbors
C John Coffee Hays
D Henry Clay
B.

Which of the following countries did not have a section of Berlin during the Cold War?

A) France
B) USA
C) USSR
D) Italy

Please answer the question if you know the answer :)

Help please I don’t know the answer

The island of Saint Domingue was the 1st to win freedom in the Caribbean.
True
False

||50 POINTS||
Write a short description for each of the three steps in the voting process.

A: Registering to vote
B: Preparing to vote
C: Casting your vote

Aside from Guyana, most people in the tropical north live in…

-Urban Areas
-Rural Areas

who is the author of the secondary source document?

Were each controlled by a

Explain how and why the 1950s culture of rebellion was historically significant.

In 1939, Warsaw was:
A. A Nazi ghetto
B. A Nazi labor camp
C. The largest Jewish community in Europe
D. A thriving black market

PLSSSSSS HELPPPPPPP MEEEEEEEE 50 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!
Read: The Espionage and Sedition Acts were used to suppress not only antiwar sentiment but also politically radical ideas, especially socialist ones. The postmaster general, who had the authority to censor periodicals, declared that “most” socialist publications expressed treasonous ideas.

Question: Based on the paragraph above, we see that suppression of ideas was part of the strategy used by the Wilson administration to guarantee support of the U.S. involvement in WWI. Is it ever okay to use suppression or suspend our Bill of Rights? If so, when is it okay, and why? If not, then why? Remember to include 3 examples as evidence. 2 must be historical based and 1 is personal based.

Which type of government was most likely to align with the ussr during the Cold War

Niagara Falls is made of three separate falls.


True or False

Now rewrite the simile you chose in part a create a sentence that conveys the same meaning without using a simile.

The simile I chose was: The battery sounds like “the crash of waves on rocks” < From “An Episode of War”

why do atheists not believe in the sanctity of life.

In 1-2 sentences, contrast a documentary from movies you might see in a movie theater. What are the qualities that make a documentary different from a traditional film?

how did brahminism change into hinduism

Two ways the government has helped regulate the economy since the end of the Great Depression are....

URGENT PLEASE HELP DUE TONIGHT.

I need help with three paragraphs (literally only 5 sentences each) on ADOLF HITLER very detailed on like social, economic and political impacts? Just details on him like his background for the first paragraph.

Answer this question if you know the answer
why do atheists not believe in the sanctity of life.

In Canada, just like in China, eating at McDonald’s was a novelty for us. In the wake of post-Mao economic reforms, the belated introduction of the Golden Arches to China represented a whole ethos about what constituted the good life. Fast food might connote easy accessibility or overindulgence in the West, but McDonald’s presented a different kind of comfort for my family and me. The cost of a burger was hardly a trivial thing for us at the time, and my parents didn’t actually treat me to meals there all that often. When they did, we always got takeout so we could eat our burgers and fries around our Formica dining table, on our own plates. The hope was to have our fast food as slowly as we could.

The Filet-O-Fish became my menu item of choice. Its virtues are too many to count; doing so would be futile. As McDonald’s only seafood-based option, the Filet-O-Fish’s semblance of relative health appealed to my parents. Luckily it was also McDonald’s most delicious item. It played to my Chinese palate: While other McDonald’s buns were toasted, the Filet-O-Fish’s was steamed, much like the baozi2. From its honeyed starch to its tangy tartar and savory fillet, the taste of the Filet-O-Fish carries an ineffable umami-ness. At once sweet and sour, it reminds me of orange-chicken sauce: a plausibly Chinese flavor mass-produced in America. Eating one always felt transportive — the equivalent of Proust’s madeleine3 for my Chinese diasporic upbringing.

The Filet-O-Fish is the gold standard of fast food for many Asian-Americans, as well as other minority American communities. Invented by an Ohio franchise owner in 1962, the first Filet-O-Fish was the answer to the problem of McDonald’s falling sales on Fridays, when observant Catholics abstained from eating meat. Born from an attempt to market fast food to as many people as possible, the tasty little unit has since been further claimed by everyone from fish-loving Chinese-Americans to practicing Muslims to — well, anyone with taste. By 1965 the sandwich had gone national.

Its appeal is inscrutable, perhaps out of proportion to its paltry constituent parts. Consider the recognizably flaky fish patty, made from the ubiquitous Alaskan pollock. “Pollock is everywhere,” writes the marine fisheries biologist Kevin M. Bailey in the book “Billion-Dollar Fish.” “It is the pure white meat in fish sticks bought at Walmart and Filet-O-Fish burgers ordered in McDonald’s.” But you wouldn’t want the fish to be more interesting. The generic quality of pollock’s fishiness — common enough for various cuisines to lay claim to it — is part of its allure. So maybe what makes the sandwich beloved isn’t its taste at all, but the juxtaposition of its elements: A single fillet of fried fish, topped with a thin slice of American cheese and tartar sauce, all of it cradled in a bun whose impossible roundness suggests the triumph of industrial food production.

As a child, I was under the fantasy that my obsession with such a strange sandwich was eccentric. When I went to McDonald’s with friends who got Chicken McNuggets Happy Meals or cheeseburgers, ordering the Filet-O-Fish made me feel as if I was in on some sort of secret. After a few years in Montreal, my dad landed a good government job in Victoria, British Columbia. On our drive across Canada, we indulged in the prospect of my dad’s earning a real salary by eating at McDonald’s almost daily, a whirlwind of Filet-O-Fish meals (for me) and hamburgers (for my parents). But my experience was shattered when I, fancying myself different, pointed out that my parents both loved hamburgers while I, a renegade, preferred the Filet-O-Fish. “Well, I like the Filet-O-Fish most too,” my mother put it candidly. “But it is expensive, so we only buy it for you.”

These days, the sandwich is more expensive than ever; it’s also less beautiful than I remember. At some point, the Filet-O-Fish underwent rebranding: An ostentatious paper box replaced the modest blue wrapper, while what I remember being a full slice of cheese seems to have shrank by half. McDonald’s insists that the cheese has always been half a slice — so as not to overwhelm the fishiness of the fillet. Today’s unboxing experience most often reveals limp cheese sagging off the patty, frequently stuck to the ill-advised box. Where is the madeleine of my youth? Nowadays, a good Filet-O-Fish is hard to find.
Which of the following statements best encapsulates the author’s line of reasoning in the passage?
A.“...McDonald’s presented a different kind of comfort for my family and me.” (paragraph 2)
B.“By 1965 the sandwich had gone national.” (paragraph 4)
C.“Its appeal is inscrutable, perhaps out of proportion to its paltry constituent parts.” (paragraph 5)
D.“These days, the sandwich is more expensive than ever; it’s also less beautiful than I remember.” (paragraph 7, sentence 1)
E.“Nowadays, a good Filet-O-Fish is hard to find.” (paragraph 7, sentence 6)

can you help me with this please

The Maginot Line in France was effective in stopping Germany’s military advances into France during World War II.

A) True
B) False

Please answer the question if you know the right answer :)

Compare/contrast the economic characteristics of West, East, and South Africa. (This may include the importance of the gold trade, slavery, and ivory) WILL GIVE BRAINLY

7
Which statement describes how the Russian Revolution of 1917 influenced President Wilson's decision to get involved in World War I?
A The Russian Revolution encouraged President Wilson to declare war in order to put a stop to the Czar.
B The Russian Revolution worried President Wilson as an example of what can go wrong in a major conflict.
The Russian Revolution eliminated President Wilson's concerns about entering an alliance with a tyrant.
D The Russian Revolution made President Wilson more hesitant to get involved in World War I for fear of upsetting the Russians

(Filipino sub) Nagbibigay aliw ito sa maraming kaparaanan maliban sa,
a. Katatawanan
b. Pang-aasar
c. Pag-aaway
d. ramatikong paglalahad

What is a reason that you would want to fight in the Vietnam War?