Answer:
When a business is the only supplier of a good or service and there are no close substitutes available, this is called a monopoly. A monopoly gives the company significant control over the market, allowing them to set higher prices and restrict output. This lack of competition can also lead to reduced innovation and a lack of incentive to improve products or services. Monopolies are generally considered harmful to consumer welfare, which is why many countries have antitrust laws and regulations in place to prevent them.
What factors would influence a firm to locate close to its inputs rather than closer to its market?
red, ws that -rything is pre-determined and things work according to the plan of purifies and heart from envy, rancor and hat ah. lim to lead a life based on fear and Hope (Khauf-hal-Rajas). ws that absolute salvation may note lie in doing righteous work. not be over confident that he will enter paradise because of his He should rather do good work and ask Allah. Grace to attain arly he should not be despondent and give up. He should hope of Allah and strive hard to do well. Explain how the belief in Qadha and Qadr help a Muslim lead righteous life. the term Qadar and Qhadaa giving necessary illustrations.
Muslims are enabled to lead righteous lives by their belief in Qadha and Qadr which guide them toward an understanding that everything works according to Allah's plan.
Why is this important?This faith inspires the avoidance of envy, rancor, and hatred while leading a life filled with fear and hope. Absolute salvation is sourced from Allah's mercy as opposed to just performing good deeds alone.
Therefore, as humble humans striving for perfection, Muslims should not be over-confident or despondent but put their trust instead in Allah's might and push themselves to do good. We understand Qadha to mean Allah's decree of events, while Qadr refers to the extent of occurrences.
Read more about Islam here:
https://brainly.com/question/1214743
#SPJ1
The Warsaw Pact was a military alliance between the Soviets and Western European countries. True
False
Answer:
True. The warsaw pact was a military alliance between the Soviets and Western European Countries.
Answer:
Explanation:
the answer is true
In Hidden Figures
Do you think the movie paints an accurate picture of racism in the south under Jim Crow? Why or why not?
What is Judicial Review?
Select one:
a.
The power the Supreme Court has to interpret the Constitution and declare laws and actions unconstitutional.
b.
The proceedings in front of the Supreme Court.
c.
The arguments in court in front of the Supreme Court Justices
d.
Presenting evidence to the Supreme Court for trial.
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Judicial Review refers to the power of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution and determine the constitutionality of laws and government actions. It is an essential part of the checks and balances system established by the Constitution and serves as a key means for protecting individual rights and ensuring that the government operates within the limits set by the Constitution.
What did you need to get into a "speakeasy" during Prohibition? A. a distributor B. bribe money C. connections D. a password
List nine of the thirteen countries in Europe that were a part of NATO.
The central question of the Harlem Renaissance is:
A contemplative response to Chicano identity.
An American-Japanese quest for cultural equality.
A search for African-American self-identity.
If the world has gone mad, shouldn't art reflect it?
100 points and brainliest please help.
Distributions of Population. Consider the following:
● changes in urban-rural population
● patterns of migrations
● population density
Answer:
Changes in urban-rural population, migration patterns, and population density are all variables that influence population distribution.
Changes in urban-rural population relate to individuals moving from rural to urban regions or vice versa. This mobility has an impact on the demographic distribution within a country or area. In many industrialised nations, for example, there has been a tendency towards urbanisation, resulting in a change in population distribution from rural to urban regions.
Migration patterns influence population distribution as well. People may move for a number of reasons, including economic opportunity, political unrest, or environmental concerns. These movements have the potential to alter population distribution both within and across nations.
Another major aspect influencing population dispersal is population density. The amount of people living in a particular region is referred to as population density. those with a high population density are more densely populated and may be more urbanised, whilst those with a low population density may be more rural and sparsely populated.
Overall, these variables interact to influence population distribution within a specific region or country.
Who was the real Napoleon Bonaparte?
A great French hero who saved France from destruction and started new effective programs?
OR
A power-hungry dictator who used France's problems as opportunity to take over and eliminate the personal freedoms created during the French Revolution
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821), also known as Napoleon I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing political power in France in a 1799 coup d’état, he crowned himself emperor in 1804. Shrewd, ambitious and a skilled military strategist, Napoleon successfully waged war against various coalitions of European nations and expanded his empire. However, after a disastrous French invasion of Russia in 1812, Napoleon abdicated the throne two years later and was exiled to the island of Elba. In 1815, he briefly returned to power in his Hundred Days campaign. After a crushing defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, he abdicated once again and was exiled to the remote island of Saint Helena, where he died at 51.
Answer:
Either
Explanation:
The real Napoleon Bonaparte was a complex historical figure who cannot be reduced to a single interpretation. He rose to power in France during a period of political and social turmoil and became a military leader, eventually becoming the Emperor of France. He implemented a series of significant reforms, including the Napoleonic Code, which created a uniform legal system for all of France. However, he also waged wars of conquest throughout Europe, which resulted in the deaths of millions of people. Some view him as a hero for his military victories and his contributions to the modernization of France, while others see him as a ruthless dictator who trampled on individual liberties and fueled his own ambition at the expense of his subjects.
I need a summary about the Irainian revolution of 1979? Is history And revenant people
Put the amendments in the correct order, the oldest should be at the top.
= President is limited to two terms
= Right to bear arms
= Abolished slavery
= Search and seizure
= Congressional pay
= Freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly
= Women's suffrage
= No poll tax
1st Amendment - Freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly
2nd Amendment - Right to bear arms
4th Amendment - Search and seizure
13th Amendment - Abolished slavery
19th Amendment - Women's suffrage
22nd Amendment - President is limited to two terms
24th Amendment - No poll tax
27th Amendment - Congressional pay
Why did Napoleon keep making mistakes in order to gain his empire?
Answer:
Napoleon's desire for power and control may have clouded his judgment, leading him to make impulsive decisions. Additionally, his ambitious goals may have caused him to take risks that ultimately resulted in mistakes.
Explanation:
What is the MOST likely reason that the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is such an infamous extremist group in the United States?
O A.
OB.
OC.
O D.
their status as the only domestic extremist group
their high level of political activity and influence
their history of extreme violence and intimidation
their focus on targeting Black Americans
Answer:
The most likely reason that the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is such an infamous extremist group in the United States is their history of extreme violence and intimidation. The KKK was originally formed in the aftermath of the American Civil War to oppose the civil rights of Black Americans and maintain white supremacy in the South. They used violent tactics such as lynchings, bombings, and arson to intimidate and terrorize Black Americans, as well as other minority groups and their allies. While the KKK is no longer as active or influential as it once was, their legacy of violence and hate has made them a notorious and infamous extremist group in US history. While they have had some political activity and influence, and have targeted other minority groups, their primary focus has always been on targeting Black Americans.
All of the behaviors listed in the chart above are reflective of the beliefs of . These beliefs are part of .
Reflective teaching is a practice where teachers take a step back from their lesson plans and critically evaluate their own teaching strategies and techniques.
This process of self-reflection enables teachers to identify areas of strength, areas that require improvement, and opportunities for growth in their teaching practice.
By reflecting on their teaching methods, teachers can adjust their approach and better meet the needs of their students, which can lead to improved student learning outcomes.
Learn more about Reflective teaching, here
https://brainly.com/question/8124455
#SPJ1
How did the world respond to the Darfur Genocide?
Answer:Both Britain and the US responded by sending their military to Sudan to help and have peace and order in the country. Some countries in the international community believed that Darfur already committed an act of genocide unto its the people. However, a report from the UN that it was not genocide. Still, the UN does not take away the responsibility of the people who were the reasons on what happened in Sudan.
Explanation:
The international response to the Darfur Genocide was complex and multifaceted. There was widespread condemnation of the violence and human rights abuses, with various countries, organizations, and individuals calling for intervention to stop the atrocities. The United Nations deployed peacekeeping forces, and some countries imposed sanctions on Sudanese officials. However, the response was criticized for being slow and insufficient, and debates over sovereignty, political interests, and logistical challenges hindered more robust action. The Darfur Genocide remains a tragic example of the complexities and limitations of international intervention in such situations.
Which statement most accurately describes a major difference in emphasis between the two speeches? A. The speech to the American public has a more formal tone than the speech to Congress. B. The speech to the American public places more blame on Japan than the speech to Congress. C. The speech to the American public emphasizes Japan's deceit more than the speech to Congress. D. The speech to the American public uses more emotional language than the speech to Congress.
The statement that accurately describes a major difference in emphasis between the two speeches is D. The speech to the American public uses more emotional language than the speech to Congress.
What is the main difference in emphasis between Roosevelt's speeches?
In his speech to Congress, Roosevelt focused on defending the United States against treachery and ensuring that such an attack would never happen again. He spoke with a formal tone which reflects the gravity of the situation.
In contrast, his radio address to the American people emphasized the emotional aspect of the war effort. He emphasized that every single person in the country was a partner in the undertaking, sharing both the good and the bad news of the war.
Missing excerpt "Read the following excerpts from two speeches given by Franklin D. Roosevelt at the onset of America's entrance into World War II in 1941. The first speech was given to Congress and the second was a radio address to the nation: 1. I believe that I interpret the will of the Congress and of the people when I assert that we will not only defend ourselves to the uttermost, but will make it very certain that this form of treachery shall never again endanger us. 2. We are now in this war. We are all in it — all the way. Every single man, woman and child is a partner in the most tremendous undertaking of our American history. We must share together the bad news and the good news, the defeats and the victories — the changing fortunes of war"
Read more about Franklin Roosevelt
brainly.com/question/832342
#SPJ1
1:WHAT ROLE DID SOUTH AFRICAN WOMEN PLAY AGAINST THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM THE 1950s TO 1960s?
I am assuming that this was about the South African rights violation that happened during that time.
Women played a crucial role, urging the greater democratic movement to address women’s issues and strengthening the leadership of women.
Explanation: Women of all races were organized by the newly created Federation of South African Women to fight for equality. The federation began in a small town but quickly grew across the country, organizing on the streets and within labor unions. Many smaller demonstrations resulted from these grassroots initiatives, culminating in the women's march on Pretoria, South Africa's capital, in 1956.
Consequently, as a result the fight against apartheid was started by Nelson Mandela, the world's most famous leader, who later became a symbol of the anti-apartheid movement. In the name of the Anti-Apartheid Movement, people protested this act (AAM). The state and the economy were monopolized by white South Africans. In the end, a concrete grassroots civil resistance movement with international support and sanctions forced the white administration to talk, demoralized by the lack of outcomes from their nonviolent struggle and armed insurrection.
Apartheid policies included:
I. Strict Segregation: Blacks were banned from reside in white regions. They could only work in white areas if they had been given permission to do so.
II. Prohibition on the creation of associations and protests: Blacks were prohibited from forming associations or protesting against the severe discrimination they were subjected to.
III. Non-whites do not have voting rights: Apartheid segregated people and categorized them according to their skin color. Non-whites were denied the right to vote.
Therefore, After a lengthy struggle against apartheid, South Africa gained independence in 1994, and the new South African Constitution abolished apartheid and granted equal rights to all people regardless of race or color. Nelson Mandela was elected President of South Africa
which of the following answer choices best compares the pax romana with the final period of the roman republic
The Pax Romana and the final period of the Roman Republic were two distinct eras in Roman history.
In contrast, the final period of the Roman Republic was a time of political instability and civil unrest that lasted for several decades, from the late 2nd century BCE to the end of the Roman Republic in 27 BCE.
Political System: During the Pax Romana, Rome was ruled by emperors who held absolute power and were often regarded as god-like figures. In contrast, during the final period of the Roman Republic.
Learn more about Pax Romana, here
https://brainly.com/question/417329
#SPJ1
Why the holocaust was important in that time
The reason why the holocaust was important in that time was that it left some legazy which improve the global consciousness.
What was the Holocaust?
The Holocaust, an as well be regarded as the Shoah, which can be considered as the genocide of European Jews and this ttook place in the period of the World War II.
It should be noted that it was a period of time around the 1941 and 1945, where Nazi Germany as well as the collaborators ttok away the lives of some six million Jews across German-occupied Europe however thisperiod was important because improve the global consciousness.
Learn more about holocaust at:
https://brainly.com/question/23436542
#SPJ1
What is the general, ultimate goal of extremist groups?
O A.
OB.
O C.
O D.
to inflict violence on others in society
to change society in a particular way
to grow by gaining new members
to spread terror to other parts of the world
Answer:
The general, ultimate goal of extremist groups is to change society in a particular way. Extremist groups often hold strong ideological beliefs and seek to impose those beliefs on society through various means, which can include violence, propaganda, or political action. The ultimate goal is typically to create a society that reflects their ideology and values, which can be at odds with mainstream society. While violence can be a tactic used by extremist groups, it is often seen as a means to achieve the larger goal of societal change. The other options listed, such as growing by gaining new members or spreading terror to other parts of the world, may be strategies used by some extremist groups, but they are not the ultimate goal of extremism itself.
Why was it difficult for the western democracies to get to West Berlin?
Answer:Alarmed by the new U.S. policy of giving economic aid to Germany and other struggling European nations, as well as efforts by the Western Allies to introduce a single currency to the zones they occupied in Germany and Berlin, the Soviets blocked all rail, road and canal access to the western zones of Berlin.
Explanation:
Easy 50 points please help.
Distributions of Population. Consider the following:
● changes in urban-rural population
● patterns of migrations
● population density
2-3 sentences for each bullet points
Answer:
Changes in urban-rural population: The United States has seen a significant shift in population from rural to urban areas over the past century. According to the US Census Bureau, in 1920, only 51% of the population lived in urban areas, compared to over 82% in 2020. This trend has been driven by factors such as industrialization, job opportunities, and lifestyle preferences.
Patterns of migration: The United States has a long history of migration, with different waves of immigrants arriving at different times in the country's history. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, immigrants from Europe and Asia were the primary drivers of migration, while in the mid-20th century, the Great Migration saw millions of African Americans move from the South to Northern and Western cities. More recently, immigration from Latin America and Asia has increased.
Population density: The United States has a relatively low population density compared to many other countries, with an average of 93 people per square mile. However, population density varies widely across the country, with some areas, such as New York City, having a population density of over 27,000 people per square mile, while others, such as Alaska, have a population density of less than one person per square mile. Factors that influence population density include geography, climate, and economic opportunities.
100 points and brainliest please help.
What areas could population growth impact? Consider:
● climate change
● quality of life
● food supplies and sources
Answer:
All 3
Explanation:
Population growth can impact all 3 areas.
Climate change: Population growth can lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts that contribute to climate change. As the population grows, more resources are consumed, more waste is generated, and more energy is used, all of which can contribute to global warming and climate change. Additionally, as more people move to urban areas, the urban heat island effect can worsen, leading to higher temperatures and more air pollution.
Quality of life: Population growth can impact the quality of life in several ways. As cities become more crowded, traffic congestion, noise pollution, and air pollution can increase, leading to reduced quality of life for residents. Additionally, as more people compete for limited resources such as housing and jobs, inequality can worsen, and access to services such as healthcare and education may become more difficult.
Food supplies and sources: As the population grows, the demand for food increases, which can put pressure on the food supply and sources. This can lead to issues such as deforestation, overfishing, and depletion of other natural resources. Additionally, as the climate changes and extreme weather events become more common, crop yields may be affected, leading to food shortages and higher prices.
The United States justification for dropping atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was that
A. the bombs' destructive power might end the war quickly
B. Japan's military power was centered in these two cities
C. Japan had attacked major cities in other nations
D. Japan was on the verge of developing its own atomic weapons
Answer:
A. The bomb's destructive power might end the war quickly.
Explanation:
The United States had two options in terms of ending the war with Japan. The first was the initiation of what is termed as "Operation Downfall", which saw to the use of almost 1.7 million US troops and almost 10 million Japanese, both in the military branch, as well as armed civilians (due to Japan's culture and usage of the Bushido Code, which essentially called for any Japanese to fight to the death and to take one's own life instead of surrendering.
The other option, which is the option that was taken, is the usage of the atomic bombs that were developed under the Manhattan Project, and was targeted at Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki, with Hiroshima and Nagasaki being the final destinations. The first atomic bomb which was dropped on Hiroshima, was dubbed "Little Boy", and ignited by firing a Uranium-235 into another, resulting in a fission chain reaction. The second atomic bomb, dropped on Nagasaki, was dubbed "Fat Man", in which High Explosives was fired into the Plutonium, creating a nuclear explosion.
What is noteworthy is that the United States really only had 2 atomic bombs and a third one under developed, but was able to bluff their way in creating the assumption that they had a large stock of nuclear weapons. This led to the eventual surrender of Japan in September 2, 1945.
Learn more about World War II, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8605481
Module 11 Section 1 Part 2
I. Germany expands
Hitler dreamed of avenging Germany's defeat in World War 1 so he wanted____________
Answer
Germany has been actively preparing for war to redistribute the world
Explanation:
This was used by Hiler as one of the typical reasons for the purpose of creating 1 Greater Germany in Europe
Drag each tile to the correct box.
Match the name of each leader with his description.
Tiles
US president at the time
of the Louisiana Purchase
a formerly enslaved person who led a
rebellion in Haiti
diplomat who negotiated the
Louisiana Purchase in France
French ruler during the time
of the Louisiana Purchase
Pairs
Napoleon Bonaparte
arrowBoth
Toussaint Louverture
arrowBoth
Thomas Jefferson
arrowBoth
James Monroe
arrowBoth
Thomas Jefferson = US president at the time of the Louisiana Purchase
Toussaint Louverture = a formerly enslaved person who led a rebellion in Haiti
James Monroe = a diplomat who negotiated the Louisiana Purchase in France
Napoleon Bonaparte = French ruler during the time of the Louisiana Purchase
The Renaissance was a turning
point in European history because it affected all levels
of society from government to the church and to the
lives of ordinary people.
What did you include in your response?
The Renaissance was a turning point in European
history.
It affected many areas of society.
It led to changes in art, literature, and philosophy.
Answer:
The historical event being referred to is the Renaissance, which was a period of great cultural and intellectual growth in Europe. The Renaissance saw a renewed interest in classical learning and humanism, which influenced the development of art, literature, and philosophy during this time.
Explanation:
(Imagine that you are a missionary working among a people in Central Africa. Write a letter to the British governor defending the people to whom you minister against imperialist confistication of their land and forced relocation.):
"Please do not hurt thy people within my area. I have taught them the ways of Christ and they shall learn to be an ally of us, respecting and seeing forth to the world in their new eyes. Our imperialistic efforts are needed elsewhere, and if we fight these people, we undermine years of growth, and taint their ways which they are slowly and pacifistly changing. Conversion is best by the freedom of mind, not force."
[Chapter 19 World History Review Chapter Question Section]
The letter to the governor has been written in the space that we have below
How to write the letterEsteemed Governor,
I come to you with grave trepidation for those whom I serve in Central Africa. Reports have reached me regarding the government's intention to expropriate their land and coerce them into relocation. Thus, I beseech you to reconsider such a course of action.
These people are my Christian compatriots, who comprehend and appreciate aspects of globalization gradually. Nonviolent in nature, they aspire for enlightenment at their own pace. However, vesting coercion upon these people would not only halt this progression but also abolish years of progress and growth.
Ascribed as a participant of Christianity, I find that inner-mind emancipation rather than duress arrests more effective Conversion. People must be permitted unprejudiced choice before embracing superior culture. By forcing them to discard their cherished lands, we will deal them hideous injustice.
Additionally, I am convinced our imperialistic methods hold greater potential beyond this domain. There exist sundry African regions where exploiting extremist measures can remain unnecessary in advancing communal lifestyles. Let us converge resources remote from my jurisdiction to benefit each member of Africa equitably.
Therefore, may I plead with you to mull over your proposed designs whilst collaborating towards an impartial resolution satisfactory to all parties? Your prompt reflection on this matter is precious indeed.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Read more on letter writing here:https://brainly.com/question/26430877
#SPJ1
compare and contrast assassination of archduke franz ferdinand and versailles treaty