The edict of Nantes declared official government tolerance of the Protestant minority in France.
What was The edict of Nantes?The edict of Nantes was issued by King Henry IV in 1598 and granted certain rights and protections to French Protestants, known as Huguenots, such as the freedom to worship in their own churches and hold public office.
The affair of the placards and the chambre ardente were both incidents of religious persecution against Protestants, while the edict of Fontainebleau was a revocation of the edict of Nantes and marked the beginning of a renewed wave of persecution against Protestants in France.
Learn more about Protestant at:
https://brainly.com/question/13300655
#SPJ1
Which strategy contributed to U.S. success in the 1991 Gulf War? Defying the directive of the United Nations Meeting for secret peace talks in a neutral location Assembling a multinational coalition of support Forcing the United Nations to expel aggressor countries
The strategy that contributed to U.S. success in the 1991 Gulf War was assembling a multinational coalition of support.
The United States, under the leadership of President George H.W. Bush, worked to build a coalition of over 30 countries, including many from the Middle East, to oppose Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. This coalition provided the U.S. with a broad base of support and allowed for the sharing of resources and intelligence. The coalition also helped to legitimize the use of military force against Iraq and provided a broad diplomatic front against the invasion.
This coalition played a critical role in the success of the U.S.-led military campaign. The U.S. was able to build up a formidable military force in the region, including troops from a number of coalition partners. This allowed for a coordinated and multi-faceted attack on Iraq that was able to achieve its goals in a relatively short period of time. The use of precision-guided weapons and advanced military technology also contributed to the success of the campaign.
Overall, the multinational coalition was a key factor in the U.S. success in the 1991 Gulf War. It provided the U.S. with a broad base of support and helped to legitimize the use of military force against Iraq, while also providing critical military resources and intelligence.
The strategy that contributed to U.S. success in the 1991 Gulf War was assembling a multinational coalition of support.
Under President George H.W. Bush's leadership, the United States tried to establish a coalition of over 30 countries, including many from the Middle East, to oppose Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. This coalition gave the United States a broad base of support and enabled the exchange of resources and intelligence. The alliance also contributed to the legitimacy of the use of military force against Iraq by providing a strong diplomatic front opposing the invasion.
The United States was able to assemble a substantial military presence in the region, which included troops from several coalition allies. Overall, the global coalition was critical to the United States' triumph in the Gulf War.
To learn more on Gulf War, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7755622
#SPJ2
What was the immediate goal of the Albany Movement?
to end integration in Albany, Georgia
What did protest leaders anticipate would occur at the end of the Albany Movement?
What types of tactics did protesters in Albany use?
Why did the Albany police arrest more than 500 protesters?
Why did Martin Luther King Jr. come to Albany, Georgia?
Why was the Albany Movement unsuccessful?
Skip to navigation
Answer:
What did protest leaders anticipate would occur at the end of the Albany Movement?
Protest leaders anticipated that the Albany Movement would result in the desegregation of all public facilities in the city, including schools, buses, and government buildings. They also hoped that it would inspire similar movements throughout the South and bring national attention to the struggle for civil rights. However, the movement ultimately fell short of its goals.
What types of tactics did protesters in Albany use?
Protesters in Albany used a variety of nonviolent tactics, including sit-ins, boycotts, and marches. They also engaged in voter registration drives and economic boycotts of local businesses that refused to desegregate.
Why did the Albany police arrest more than 500 protesters?
The Albany police arrested more than 500 protesters in an attempt to intimidate and discourage them from continuing their nonviolent protests. They also hoped to disrupt the momentum of the movement and prevent it from gaining widespread support.
Why did Martin Luther King Jr. come to Albany, Georgia?
Martin Luther King Jr. came to Albany, Georgia, in December 1961 to support the Albany Movement and help coordinate its strategy. His involvement brought national attention to the struggle for civil rights in Albany and helped to inspire similar movements throughout the South.
Why was the Albany Movement unsuccessful?
The Albany Movement was ultimately unsuccessful in achieving its immediate goals of desegregating public facilities in Albany. Despite the efforts of civil rights leaders, the movement faced fierce opposition from local officials and segregationists, and internal disagreements among protest leaders also weakened its effectiveness. However, the Albany Movement did lay the groundwork for future civil rights struggles and helped to inspire a new generation of activists.
explain the significance of the following dates: 1607, founding of jamestown; 1620, arrival of the pilgrims and signing of the mayflower compact; 1776, adoption of the declaration of independence; 1787, writing of the u.s. constitution; 1803, louisiana purchase; and 1861-1865, civil war.
The dates 1607, 1620, 1776, 1787, 1803, and 1861-1865 are significant in United States history.
1607 marks the founding of Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in America. 1620 marks the arrival of the Pilgrims and the signing of the Mayflower Compact. 1776 is the date the Declaration of Independence was adopted, declaring the independence of the United States.
1787 marks the writing of the U.S. Constitution, which formed the laws and government of the nation. 1803 marks the Louisiana Purchase, which doubled the size of the country.
1861-1865 marks the Civil War, which was fought between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. These dates are all important because they mark the major events that shaped the United States as we know it today.
To know more about Civil War click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
True/False: bible graphs showing jewish history of bible interpretation hellinistic judaism midieval period reformation
Answer: True
Explanation:
4.07quiz the new frontier
a) John Kennedy won the 1960 presidential election. (Option C)
b) The 1960 presidential election is significant for several reasons. One of the most notable is that it was the first presidential election to feature televised debates between the candidates. (Option a)
c) In his inaugural speech, Kennedy challenged Americans to get involved in helping others by asking not what their country could do for them, but what they could do for their country. (Option C)
What is the explanation for the above response?a) John Kennedy won the 1960 presidential election. This is a historical fact.
b) The 1960 presidential election is significant for several reasons. One of the most notable is that it was the first presidential election to feature televised debates between the candidates. This allowed voters to see the candidates in action and hear their positions on various issues, which had a significant impact on the outcome of the election.
Also, the 1960 election was one of the closest in US history, with Kennedy winning by a narrow margin over Nixon. The election was also significant because it marked a shift in American politics, as Kennedy represented a younger, more progressive generation of politicians.
c) In his inaugural speech, Kennedy challenged Americans to get involved in helping others by asking not what their country could do for them, but what they could do for their country. This call to civic duty and public service is one of the most famous lines from his speech and has become a lasting legacy of his presidency.
The speech as a whole also emphasized the need for global cooperation, peace, and the pursuit of freedom and justice for all people, both at home and abroad.
Learn more about New Frontier at:
https://brainly.com/question/9404303
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full questions:
a) Who won the 1960 presidential election?
Richard Nixon
Gerald Ford
John Kennedy
Dwight Eisenhower
b) Why is the 1960 presidential election significant?
First televised presidential debate
First time two communists run for president
First time two candidates agreed with each other
First time two Republicans run for president
3) What did Kennedy challenge Americans to do in his inaugural speech with these words: "Ask not what your country can do for you-ask what you can do for your country."
Protest more
Pay higher taxes
Get involved in helping others
Join the military
how did the textile industry change the focus of south Carolina's economy? Helped to move the economy away from _____ or sharecropping
Answer:
From the late nineteenth century through most of the twentieth century, the textile industry dominated South Carolina manufacturing. It employed the majority of all manufacturing workers, and its company towns set the terms of life for thousands of white Carolinians.
Explanation:
plea bargains a.are no longer a major part of the criminal justice system. b.have been openly discussed since the 1920s. c.were generally negotiated in secret late 1970s/early 1980s. d.were generally negotiated in secret in the 1920s.
Plea bargains were generally negotiated in secret late 1970s/early 1980s. Therefore the correct option is option C.
A plea bargain is a deal that a defendant enters into with the prosecutor in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty or no contest in exchange for a lighter sentence or a reduced charge.
The plea agreement may be entered into at any time during the case's trial, including before or after the trial has begun. It is known to have been secretively negotiated during the late 1970s/early 1980s.
A plea bargain refers to a deal made between the prosecutor and the defendant to avoid going to trial, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty or no contest in exchange for a lighter sentence or a reduced charge.
Although plea bargains have been openly discussed since the 1920s, they were generally negotiated in secret until late 1970s/early 1980s. Therefore the correct option is option C.
For such more question on Plea:
https://brainly.com/question/11974746
#SPJ11
before the outbreak of the texas revolution, james fannin led the bloodless attack on a mexican army garrison at the port of anahuac that was much criticized by many texans. a) true
Before the outbreak of the Texas Revolution, James Fannin led the bloodless attack on a Mexican Army garrison at the port of Anahuac that was much criticized by many Texans. This statement is true.
The Texas Revolution was a rebellion in which settlers in the Texas area declared and fought for independence from Mexico. The war started in October 1835 and ended in April 1836 with the establishment of the Republic of Texas.
The leader of the Mexican garrison at Anahuac, which was in command of the harbor that served the region around Texas, was Colonel John Bradburn. The settlers under James Fannin assaulted Bradburn's garrison in June 1832, protesting his oppressive activities in the area, including the overpricing of land and the detention of William Barret Travis's vessel Brazoria.
The "Anahuac Disturbances" began when Bradburn imprisoned Travis, who later became one of the heroes of the Texas Revolution.
William Barret Travis, who would later play a key role in the Texas Revolution, was detained by Bradburn. This resulted in settlers, including Fannin, attacking the Mexican soldiers in Anahuac in 1832. As a result, the conflict sparked outrage among some people in Texas.
To learn more about Texas Revolution: https://brainly.com/question/19819328
#SPJ11
explain one way in which the dates of indepence could be intepreted as illustrating the way in which independence movements spread through latin america
Answer: The dates of independence in Latin America can be interpreted as illustrating the way in which independence movements spread through the region through a process of contagion or diffusion.
Starting with the Haitian Revolution in 1791, which was the first successful slave rebellion in the Americas, the ideas of freedom, equality, and democracy began to spread throughout the region. This inspired other revolutionary movements in countries such as Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexico, which gained independence in the early 19th century.
The dates of independence in Latin America reflect this process of contagion, with the independence movements spreading from country to country over a period of several decades. For example, after Haiti gained independence in 1804, Venezuela declared independence in 1811, followed by Colombia in 1813, Argentina in 1816, Chile in 1818, and Mexico in 1821.
This pattern suggests that the independence movements in Latin America were not isolated events, but rather part of a broader regional process of political and social change. The ideas and ideals of the Enlightenment, which emphasized individual rights, popular sovereignty, and the rule of law, played a key role in inspiring these movements and uniting them against the colonial powers.
Explanation:
imagine yourself as winston smith at the beginning of 1984. what would you do to undermine the party? knowing what you know now, how would you extricate yourself from the fate that awaits you?
At the beginning of 1984, Winston Smith would attempt to undermine the Party in any way he could.
He would likely attempt to find someone who is also an enemy of the Party and form an alliance. He could also spread any anti-Party ideas he finds, as well as finding ways to disrupt the Party's systems.
Knowing what he knows now, Winston would attempt to flee the country or find some way to hide from the Party. He could also attempt to form a larger resistance movement against the Party and unite the people against them.
Overall, Winston would try to find a way to avoid the fate that awaits him and actively fight back against the Party.
To know more about resistance movement click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/16286343#
#SPJ11
QUICK 25 points !!For this assignment, you will write complete paragraphs to answer questions about 19th-century conflicts between the United States and Mexico.
To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all of the questions completely.
This assignment is worth 30 points.
WRITE PARAGRAPH ANSWERS
Answer each question in a complete paragraph, including a topic sentence that restates the question, at least three supporting detail sentences, and a concluding sentence that wraps up the paragraph. Be sure to use evidence from the lesson to support your ideas.
1. What caused the Mexican-American War? (6 points)
2. How did the Mexican-American War end? (6 points)
3. What were three major consequences of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo for Mexico? (6 points)
4. What was the Gadsden Purchase? (6 points)
5. Do you think the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did enough to protect the rights of Mexican citizens whose land became part of the United States? Why? (6 points)
The Mexican-American War, sometimes referred to as the Mexican War in the United States and as the American Intervention in Mexico (IEM) in Mexico, lasted from 1846 to 1848.
In the 1800s, what led to war between the US and Mexico?The so-called Mexican-American War took place between Mexico and the United States. The duration of this fight was 1846–1848. Mexico awarded the United States territory after the conflict. These lands currently make up parts of Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, and several more states.
What sparked the conflict between US and Mexico?The Mexican-American War was directly sparked by disputed land on the Nueces Strip between Texas and the United States. Mexican authorities and citizens were upset by Texas's admission to the United States because Mexico did not recognize Texas as an official American territory.
Unknown factors might have contributed to the Mexican War's termination.In September 1847, when its army was routed and the capital, Mexico City, fell, the Mexican government submitted to American demands and started peace negotiations.
As a result of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, what three changes did Mexico go through?As a result of the pact, Mexico's land area was almost cut in half, while the United States' territory more than quadrupled. Both countries had long-term effects from this land swap. The victory and signature of the treaty gave the United States access to the Pacific Ocean and a wealth of ports, minerals, and other natural resources that would not have been accessible to a developing country.
What did Gadsden's acquisition consist of?The Gadsden Purchase, also recognized as the Gadsden Treaty, was an arrangement between the United States and Mexico that's been finalized in 1854. It stated that the United States will indeed pay Mexico $10 million for a component of Mexico that encased 29,670 square miles and afterward became a part of Arizona and New Mexico.
Do you believe the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo done enough to safeguard the rights of Mexican nationals whose territory was annexed by the US? Why?During treaty negotiations, it was necessary to clarify the legal standing of the thousands of Mexican, Spanish, and mestizo people of the annexation territory. Notwithstanding these safeguards, the bulk of them were deprived of their possessions and privileges as Anglo Americans founded state governments and settled in the southwest.
Learn more about Gadsden Treaty: https://brainly.com/question/8964816
#SPJ1
The Sepoy were
sugar plantation owners that influenced the annexation of Hawaii.
Chinese rebels that fought against western intervention.
Native American warriors that resisted American expansion.
Indian soldiers during the British Raj.
While the British Raj existed, the Sepoy were Indian soldiers.
Who were sepoys?The European colonial powers enlisted Indian soldiers known as sepoys from among the country's local people. The sepoys were organized into battalions under the command of European officers, trained, and armed in the European tradition. Up until 1885, the units were known as "native sepoys," but the word "native" was afterwards omitted.
Describe a sepoy example.Anybody who served as a soldier felt self-conscious at some point. No rank markings are visible on the uniform of a sepoy. Despite being gravely injured and unfazed, this sepoy crawled up to within five yards of his goal with extraordinary guts and tenacity.
To know more about Sepoy visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29774528
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements best explains basic Northern bellefs prior to the Civil War?
Answer:
states needed to be given more control
Answer:
All people were created equal, regardless of color
Explanation:
he Civil War, or American Civil War, was a war waged in the United States from 1861 to 1865. As a result, among other things, of a historical controversy over slavery and against attempts by the US federal executive to take powers that do not corresponded constitutionally, the war broke out in April 1861, when the forces of the Confederate States of America attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina, shortly after President Abraham Lincoln took office. The nationalists of the Union proclaimed loyalty to the Constitution of the United States. They clashed with secessionists from the Confederate States, who defended the rights of states to expand slavery.
Hope this helps!
Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/3213802#readmore
If you were an American citizen in 1938, would you think that war was just avoided?
No, I would not think that war was just avoided in 1938. The Munich Agreement, signed between Germany and the Allied powers in September of that year, had averted a war between the two sides, but the underlying problems had not been resolved.
The agreement had given Germany control of the Sudetenland, an area of Czechoslovakia inhabited mainly by ethnic Germans. This had strengthened Hitler's grip on Europe, and I would have seen the Nazi threat continuing to grow. In addition, Japanese aggression in China was escalating, and I would have been concerned that war could break out in the Far East at any time.
I would also have been aware of the similarities between the events of 1938 and the events leading up to the outbreak of World War I and I would certainly not have felt that war had been avoided.
To know more about World War I, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ4
when the confederation congress called for a new convention in 1787, they did so with the stated purpose of
When the Confederation Congress called for a new convention in 1787, they did so with the stated purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation.
'What is the confederation congress?The Confederation Congress refers to the national government of the United States that existed from March 1, 1781, to March 4, 1789. The government of the United States was based on the Articles of Confederation, which created a weak central government and a powerful state government.
What was the purpose of the Constitutional Convention?The purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Confederation Congress called for a new convention in 1787 to revise the Articles of Confederation because the existing system of government wasn't working.
The Articles of Confederation created a government that was too weak to solve the country's problems. The delegates to the Constitutional Convention decided that they couldn't revise the Articles of Confederation and that a new system of government was required.
They drafted a new constitution that created a strong central government with a system of checks and balances. The Constitution created a new government that was able to solve the country's problems.
TO KNOW ABOUT national government":
https://brainly.com/question/11972822
#SPJ11
which statements about the education of native americans and black americans in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century are true?
Answer:
1. Native Americans and Black Americans were often denied access to formal education.
2. Native Americans and Black Americans were often forced to attend segregated schools.
3. Native Americans and Black Americans were often taught in their own languages.
4. Native Americans and Black Americans were often taught by white teachers.
16. What does William Travis do when he finds out that Jim Bowie has taken it upon
himself to request a truce?
William Travis, upon finding out that Jim Bowie had taken it upon himself to request a truce with General Santa Anna's Mexican army, was furious. He believed that such an action was a sign of cowardice and an insult to the bravery and sacrifice of the defenders of the Alamo. Travis immediately took command and declared that there would be no truce or surrender, and that they would fight to the death if necessary. He drew a line in the sand with his sword and asked any man who was willing to stay and fight to cross it. All of the defenders, including Jim Bowie who was very ill, crossed the line, reaffirming their commitment to the cause.
THIS IS FOR ECONOMICS (please help)
Michelle promised her niece that she would take her to the movies Friday night after work. At lunch the boss informs Michelle that she needs to stay late and complete and post reports that evening. What are the opportunity costs and trade-offs of Michelle using that evening to complete that report for her boss? What ultimately is the deciding factor?
Answer:
the opportunity costs is that she will not get time to spend with her niece
why did the cherokee nation act to protect its homelands?
The Cherokee Nation took action to defend its ancestral lands because the US government was threatening to forcibly remove them.
The Cherokee Nation lived in the southern United States at the beginning of the 19th century, including sections of modern-day North Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, and Georgia. Yet when white settlers grew closer to Cherokee territory, the US government pushed for their eviction to make room for additional settling. The Indian Removal Act, which was approved in 1830, gave permission for the forcible transfer of Native American tribes to Indian Territory in modern-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee Nation objected to this strategy, claiming that they had their own independent judicial and governmental structures. In the historic Worcester v. Georgia case, they even appealed to the Supreme Court, which upheld their right to self-governance. But, in 1838, the US government disregarded the decision.
Learn more about Cherokee here:
https://brainly.com/question/13839435
#SPJ4
true or false? as the roman republican story progressed, roman armies began being tools of political ambition, causing regular clashes between roman armies and civil war
The given statement 'As the roman republican story progressed, roman armies began being tools of political ambition, causing regular clashes between roman armies and civil war' is true.
What is the Roman Republic?
The Roman Republic was the era of the ancient Roman civilization, starting with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire.
The Roman Republic is divided into two main periods: the Roman Republic proper (509–27 BC) and the Late Roman Republic (133–27 BC).During this period, the Roman Republic engaged in many battles and military campaigns, both with other powers and within the Republic itself.
These conflicts had political undertones, with powerful politicians using the military to achieve their own political goals. This often caused clashes between Roman armies and civil wars, as different factions struggled for power and control over the Republic.
Therefore, the statement that As the Roman Republican story progressed, Roman armies began being tools of political ambition, causing regular clashes between Roman armies and civil war is true.
Learn more about Roman Republic here:
brainly.com/question/19051777
#SPJ11
how many immigrants entered the united states between 1865 and 1915?
Answer:
During 1865 and 1915, more than 25 million immigrants came to America
explain the incidents with the lusitania, the arabic, and the sussex and describe how they antagonized the united states?
This question refers to three different events that contributed to the US entry into World War I: the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915, the sinking of the Arabic in 1915, and the torpedoing of the Sussex in 1916.
The Lusitania was a British ocean liner which was sunk by a German U-boat, resulting in the deaths of 1,198 passengers and crew. This incident increased anti-German sentiment in the US.
The Arabic was another British ocean liner that was sunk by a German U-boat in 1915. The sinking of the Arabic was the first of several incidents in which the Germans targeted passenger vessels, and increased US public opinion against Germany.
The Sussex was a French passenger ferry that was torpedoed by a German U-boat in 1916. This incident resulted in the US demanding that Germany adhere to international laws of neutrality, but Germany refused. This refusal ultimately led to the US entering World War I in April 1917.
To know more about World War I refer to-
brainly.com/question/1449762#
#SPJ11
How did George Washington, as president, strengthen the U.S. federal
government?
O A. By preventing immigrants from serving in government
• B. By shutting down most states' elected legislatures
• C. By encouraging rebellions against state governments
• D. By supporting plans to start a national bank
Answer: C. By encouraging rebellions against state governments. Hope this helped
✓ Details
In 3-5 sentences, assess the wisdom of US involvement in Vietnam: What were the arguments put forth by Hawks for us to be
there? What were the arguments put forth by Doves for us to pull out? Which argument do you agree with more? Why?
The wisdom of US involvement in Vietnam is a complex issue with arguments on both sides.
what does Hawks argue and what was the war?
Hawks argued that the US needed to contain the spread of communism and protect its allies in Southeast Asia. They believed that the US had a moral obligation to defend democracy and human rights against the threat of communism.
Doves, on the other hand, argued that the war was a costly and unnecessary intervention in a civil conflict that the US had no business in. They believed that the war was causing unnecessary death and suffering, and that the US should focus on domestic issues instead.
The war between the US and Vietnam, commonly known as the Vietnam War, was a conflict that took place from 1955 to 1975. The war began as a result of the US's involvement in the Cold War and its policy of containing the spread of communism. The US provided military and economic support to the South Vietnamese government, which was fighting against communist forces in the North led by the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army.
The war was marked by intense fighting, including guerilla warfare, bombing campaigns, and ground operations.
To know more about Vietnam War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4292602
#SPJ1
*pics are shown theyre two answers in one
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Look at this excerpt from Nelson Mandela's speech.
In this excerpt from his speech, Mandela uses an appeal to emotion to advance his point of view that he and his fellow citizens feel deeply connected to their country.
What does Nelson Mandela mean in this speech?Nelson Mandela compares the attachment that he and his compatriots feel to the soil of their country to the attachment that the jacaranda trees of Pretoria and the mimosa trees of the bushveld have to the soil.
This analogy is an appeal to emotion, and a persuasive technique that helps to illustrate the depth of feeling that Mandela and his compatriots have for their country. The use of the analogy is effective because it creates a visual image that helps the audience to understand the connection that Mandela and his fellow citizens have to their country.
Find out more on Nelson Mandela at https://brainly.com/question/11935085
#SPJ1
Many wars have been fought in the past over ownership and control of land however world war 1 was not fought for this reason. Why did countries around the world send their soldiers into battle at the beginning of the 20th century?
Land ownership and control were not the primary motivations for World War I, which was instead driven by complicated factors including nationalism, militarism, and alliances.
For children, what is World War One?World War I, sometimes known as the Great War, lasted from 1914 to 1918. It was mostly fought in Europe, but it also stretched to the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. It is sometimes referred to as the Great War or the First World War.
What factors led to World War I, according to the essay?In certain European countries in the years preceding World War 1, militarism was the most effective form of force to employ. Militarization had an impact on culture, the media, and public opinion in addition to legislation.
To know more about World War I visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ9
Number these events in the order they occurred.
Andrew Johnson becomes president, and he is committed to carrying out Lincoln's plan.
Lincoln and Congress propose two very different Reconstruction plans.
Congress passes the 13th and 14th Amendments.
Congress puts Southern states under army rule.
Congress passes the Wade-Davis Bill, but Lincoln vetoes it.
The events in order they occurred are : Lincoln and Congress propose two very different Reconstruction plans .
2. Congress passes the 13th and 14th Amendments.
3. Andrew Johnson becomes president, and he is committed to carrying out Lincoln's plan.
4. Congress passes the Wade-Davis Bill, but Lincoln vetoes it.
5. Congress puts Southern states under army rule.
What strategies did Johnson and Lincoln have for Reconstruction?Lincoln's plan for reconstruction had three main goals: requiring ten percent of citizens of former Confederate states to swear allegiance to the Union, drafting new state constitutions, and offering full pardons to former Confederate soldiers and sympathizers.
What was the significance of Johnson's reconstruction plan?In 1865, President Andrew Johnson put into effect a plan called Reconstruction that did not give black people a role in the politics of the South and gave the white South a free hand in regulating the transition from slavery to freedom.
Learn more about Reconstruction plan :
brainly.com/question/30446738
#SPJ1
Which two countries received the most aid?
Answer:
if you are talking about the Cold war then Great Britain and France received the most aid during that time.
how and why did islam play a role in the rapid creation and expansion of arab empires in the 7th-8th centuries?
Islam played a significant role in the rapid creation and expansion of Arab empires in the 7th-8th centuries, as Islam gave them recognition and faith in something.
The reason behind this is that Islam gave Arabs a sense of identity, a common language, and religious beliefs that allowed them to unite under one banner.
It provided a cultural and social framework that made it easier for them to conquer and rule vast territories. This religious and cultural unity enabled the Arabs to create a powerful empire in a relatively short time span, and also allowed them to hold it together despite its diverse nature.
This unity also helped the Arab empires to maintain their power and influence over an extended period. Islam also played a crucial role in the expansion of Arab empires because it offered a new religion that was more appealing than the ones that existed at that time.
Islam's emphasis on egalitarianism, social justice, and piety attracted many people who were tired of the corruption and hypocrisy of the existing religions. Islam's teachings and practices also gave a sense of purpose to the Arabs, who felt that they were the chosen people of God and had a divine mission to spread Islam to other lands.
This sense of mission and purpose made them more willing to fight for their beliefs and to expand their empire.
Thus, Islam played a significant role in the rapid creation and expansion of Arab empires in the 7th-8th centuries, providing them with a cultural and social framework that allowed them to unite under one banner, conquer vast territories, and maintain their power and influence over an extended period.
To know more about Islam, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29724916#
#SPJ11
has there only ever been one view of gender and sexuality throughout history, or one traditional view, and how do we know?
The view of gender-sexuality throughout history has not been constant. Over time, it has changed considerably.
Early societies had various views on gender and sexuality that differed from contemporary societies. Gender is a social construct that involves behaviors and characteristics that society associates with men and women. It is a cultural distinction, while biological differences are used to define sex. The way gender is seen in society varies from one place to another, and it has evolved significantly over time.
Sexuality is a human trait that is linked to both physical and emotional pleasure. It refers to the way people experience, express, and explore their sexual desires. Sexuality varies from individual to individual and can be influenced by factors like age, culture, gender identity, and more.The traditional view on gender and sexuality has changed over time. The way it is perceived in modern society is not the same as how it was viewed in the past.
In ancient times, there were various beliefs and myths regarding gender and sexuality that are different from today’s views. The most famous example is the belief that homosexuality was unnatural or immoral. Many cultures and societies throughout history were against same-sex relationships. On the other hand, some cultures embraced homosexuality and saw it as a normal part of life.
In conclusion, the view of gender and sexuality throughout history has not been constant. It has changed over time, and our modern view of gender and sexuality is not the only one that has ever existed.
To know more about gender-sexuality, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30845339#
#SPJ11