Answer:
Napoleon Bonaparte granted rights to the Jewish population for several reasons, including political, strategic, and personal motivations.
Firstly, Napoleon saw the Jewish population as a potentially useful ally in his political and military ambitions. He believed that by granting them rights, he could gain their support and loyalty, which would strengthen his position as ruler of France.
Secondly, Napoleon was also motivated by strategic considerations. He saw that the Jewish people were spread across Europe, and granting them rights in France could help him gain influence and support in other countries where Jews lived.
Thirdly, Napoleon was known for his belief in the principles of the Enlightenment, which emphasized individual rights and liberties. He saw the Jews as a group that had long been marginalized and oppressed, and he wanted to remedy this situation by granting them legal equality and protection.
Finally, it is worth noting that Napoleon's decision to grant rights to the Jewish population was not entirely altruistic. He also saw it as a way to promote his own legacy and reputation, and to demonstrate to the rest of Europe that France was a progressive and enlightened nation.
at the turn of the century, the french academy was divided rather sharply between two doctrines. which doctrine taught that color was the most important element?
The Rubenistes doctrine taught that color was the most important element in art at the turn of the century in the French Academy.
The Rubenistes doctrine were followers of Charles-Antoine Coypel and emphasized the importance of color over line in painting. They believed that color should be used to evoke emotion and create a harmonious and pleasing visual experience. The opposing doctrine, the Poussinistes, believed that line and composition were more important than color.
This disagreement led to heated debates and even physical altercations within the French Academy, ultimately influencing the direction of French art in the 18th century.
Learn more about Rubenistes https://brainly.com/question/23606379
#SPJ11
How did the axis leaders come to power in their own countries
These countries were led by German dictator Adolf Hitler, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini and Japanese Emperor Hirohito. In September 1940, the three countries formalized their alliance through the Tripartite Pact. Five other countries subsequently joined the Tripartite Pact and became Axis powers.
how did nineteenth century european imperialism differ from sixteenth century european colonialism? group of answer choices europeans began to cooperate to establish extensive global free trade zones. europeans learned to respect the native cultures of the territories in which they colonized. europeans focus shifted from control of north america to economic domination of asia and africa. europeans defeated the ottoman empire and were able to open overland trade routes to asia.
The key differences between the two was (c) Europeans focus shifted from control of North America to economic domination of Asia and Africa.
European colonialism in the sixteenth century was focused on controlling North America, whereas the nineteenth-century European imperialism saw the focus shift from North America to economic domination of Asia and Africa.
In the nineteenth century, European countries began to cooperate to establish extensive global free trade zones. This allowed them to dominate trade with the territories that they colonized and expand their economic and political power.
Europeans learned to respect the native cultures of the territories in which they colonized. In the sixteenth century, Europeans did not respect the native cultures of the territories they colonized.
But in the nineteenth century, Europeans learned to respect the native cultures of the territories they colonized. This respect was seen in the cultural policies introduced by the British, French, and Dutch colonizers.
To know more about Europeans, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1683533#
#SPJ11
true or false: the termination and relocation policies of the 1950s brought together indigenous peoples from all over the us into urban areas and ultimately set the stage for the american indian civil rights movement
The given statement “the termination and relocation policies of the 1950s did bring together indigenous peoples from all over the U.S. into urban areas and ultimately set the stage for the American Indian civil rights movement” is true because the government believed that by doing so, Native Americans would assimilate into American society and become civilized.
Under these policies, the federal government sought to assimilate Native Americans by terminating their sovereign status and relocating them from reservations to urban areas. However, the policies had disastrous consequences.
Many Native Americans faced poverty, unemployment, and discrimination in urban areas. As a result, they formed communities and organizations to advocate for their rights, leading to the emergence of the American Indian civil rights movement, the statement is true.
To learn more about Native Americans follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/8678061
#SPJ4
which people had the best relations with the native peoples?group of answer choicesspanish and englishdutch and swedishfrench and dutchdutch and english
Out of the given options, the French and Dutch people had the best relations with the native peoples. This can be seen through their trading practices and alliances with the indigenous communities.
The native peoples of America had a rich history and diverse cultures that existed long before the arrival of Europeans. As Europeans began to explore and colonize the continent, they encountered a wide variety of indigenous communities. While some of these interactions were peaceful and cooperative, others were marked by conflict, violence, and exploitation.
French and Dutch people were more interested in trade and commerce than colonization and conquest. They established strong relationships with the native communities through their trading practices and alliances. Both the French and Dutch traders were known to respect the customs and traditions of the native peoples, which helped to build trust and cooperation. They traded goods such as guns, furs, and textiles with the natives in exchange for goods such as beaver pelts, foodstuffs, and wampum.
Unlike the Spanish and English, who sought to conquer and subjugate Native Peoples, the French sought to establish economic and cultural partnerships with them. The French were often willing to learn from Native Peoples and adopt their customs and practices, such as the fur trade and intermarriage with Native women. This approach helped to establish more positive and enduring relationships with many Native Peoples, particularly in areas such as Canada and the Great Lakes region.
Learn more about native peoples:
https://brainly.com/question/21030450
#SPJ11
edpuzzle the t4 project began to get rid of what kind of people in the 1920s in the name of racial purity?
The T4 project was a Nazi Germany program to dispose of mentally and physically disabled people through involuntary euthanasia.
The T4 project was created with the aim of eliminating those who were considered unfit from the German populace. In addition to the disabled, the Nazi regime also targeted Jews, Romani people, homosexuals, and others for extermination in concentration camps as part of their genocidal efforts.
The T4 project was the first step toward the Holocaust, which claimed millions of lives in Europe. It was put into action in the early 1930s as part of a program to sterilize "undesirable" people in the name of "racial purity."
The T4 project was created with the aim of eliminating those who were considered unfit from the German populace.In addition to the disabled, the Nazi regime also targeted Jews, Romani people, homosexuals, and others for extermination in concentration camps as part of their genocidal efforts.
For such more question on euthanasia:
https://brainly.com/question/710669
#SPJ11
Compared to the rest of Latin America, Why did Brazil have a relatively smooth transition to independence?
(Blood and Fire quiz)
Please answer asap!! will give brainliest!!
Explanation:
Brazil gained it's independence with little of the violence that marked similar transitions in Spanish American
how did the chinese exclusion act represent a change in america's immigration policy and what it meant to be an american in the late 19th century
The Chinese Exclusion Act represented a significant shift in America's immigration policy and demonstrated what it meant to be an American in the late 19th century.
The act was passed in 1882, and it was the first federal law to limit immigration based on ethnicity or nationality. It prohibited Chinese immigration for ten years, preventing the Chinese from becoming naturalized citizens.
The Chinese Exclusion Act represented a change in America's immigration policy by prohibiting Chinese immigration and barring Chinese immigrants from becoming naturalized citizens. It marked the first time that the United States government had officially restricted immigration based on race or nationality.
It was also the first time that a large group of people had been excluded from the country based solely on their ethnicity or nationality.
The Chinese Exclusion Act represented a significant shift in what it meant to be an American in the late 19th century. It reinforced the idea that only people who shared a common culture and language were truly American. It also helped to create a social hierarchy in which white people were at the top and non-white people were at the bottom.
The act made it clear that the United States was a nation that was meant to be white and Christian, and it reinforced the belief that non-white people were not welcome in the country.
To learn more about immigrants, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ11
Which of these events declared official, government tolerance of the Protestant minority?
The affair of the placards
The edict of Fontainebleau
The edict of Nantes
The chambre ardente
The edict of Nantes declared official government tolerance of the Protestant minority in France.
What was The edict of Nantes?The edict of Nantes was issued by King Henry IV in 1598 and granted certain rights and protections to French Protestants, known as Huguenots, such as the freedom to worship in their own churches and hold public office.
The affair of the placards and the chambre ardente were both incidents of religious persecution against Protestants, while the edict of Fontainebleau was a revocation of the edict of Nantes and marked the beginning of a renewed wave of persecution against Protestants in France.
Learn more about Protestant at:
https://brainly.com/question/13300655
#SPJ1
How does the author illustrate Daisy's commitment to the Girl Scouts?
Title: DAISY LOW GROWS THE GIRL SCOUTS
Use the background information and excerpt to answer the questions.
Background:
Like most politicians of the early 19th century, President Andrew Jackson believed that the rights of independent white farmers should take priority over the rights of American Indians. Furthermore, the country’s population was growing, and Jackson knew that white settlers would probably move onto American Indian lands no matter what treaties were signed. As this would likely lead to conflict, Jackson thought it was in American Indians’ best interests to move west.
In this speech, Jackson addresses Congress on the subject of American Indian removal.
In this passage, Jackson calls for the removal of tribes from
Group of answer choices
North & South Carolina
Florida & Georgia
Mississippi & Alabama
Texas & Lousiana
Answer:
Mississippi & Alabama (but honestly, several others as well)
Explanation:
The Act authorized the President to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi River, primarily in the states of Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, and others.
what were the similarities and differences between chinese and japanese immigration to the united states?
The similarities and differences between Chinese and Japanese immigration to the United States can be seen in terms of the reasons for immigration, the challenges faced by immigrants, and the lasting impact of their arrival.
The primary reason for both Chinese and Japanese immigration to the United States was the need for economic opportunity. Both groups faced challenges of prejudice, racism, and labor exploitation in the United States. Although they were subject to discrimination, they were also able to create their own successful communities and lasting cultural legacies.
The challenges faced by Chinese and Japanese immigrants were largely similar. Many faced the threat of deportation, as well as restrictions on their ability to own land or vote. However, Japanese immigrants faced additional challenges due to the onset of World War II. This led to their internment in relocation camps, which was not experienced by Chinese immigrants.
The lasting impact of Chinese and Japanese immigration to the United States has been significant. Chinese immigrants have contributed to the growth of cities such as San Francisco, as well as the development of Chinatowns throughout the country. Japanese immigrants have established businesses and organizations, and are credited with introducing a number of cultural and culinary practices to the United States.
In summary, Chinese and Japanese immigration to the United States have had many similarities and differences. They have both faced challenges and discrimination, but have also been able to make lasting contributions to the United States.
To learn more about immigration here:
https://brainly.com/question/17141328#
#SPJ4
How was Persia divided in 1907?
Answer:
the answer is (A.) among Russia, Britain, and the shah of Persia
Explanation:
Answer:
Persia was divided into three zones and four parts in 1907. one part in the North of Russia. two parts which were smaller than the first, and a part in the South of Britain.
Which of the following is not a farming contribution developed by Vedic Age people?
Terraces
Enrichment of soil with manure
Metal plows
Irrigation systems
The U. S. Has contributed roughly $100 billion of the $150 billion cost of what object, which officials plan to open up to more commercial visits in the months ahead?
When the U.S. has contributed roughly $100 billion of the $150 billion cost of what object, the economic officials plan to open up to additional commercial visits in the upcoming months.
The economic officials can be referred to or taken into consideration as the officials that have a direct objective of doing the economic welfare of the society. These officials also hold the supreme authorities to take decisions in the matters related thereto, and may make more and more commercial visits, if it deems fit.
Learn more about economic officials here:
https://brainly.com/question/8112874
#SPJ4
21.3.2 Quiz: The End of the Roaring Twenties
Question 1 of 10
Speakeasies and bootleggers were a product of:
OA. debt.
OB. segregation.
OC. unemployment.
OD. Prohibition.
Answer is prohibition
Speakeasies and bootleggers were product of Prohibition, which was a period in American history when the manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol was illegal from 1920 to 1933.
What is prohibition?Prohibition refers to a legal ban on the manufacture, transportation, sale, and consumption of alcoholic beverages. The term is often used to refer to the era of alcohol prohibition in the United States, which lasted from 1920 to 1933. During this period, the 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution made it illegal to produce, transport, or sell alcoholic beverages. The goal of prohibition was to reduce crime and improve public health and morality, but it ultimately had unintended consequences, such as the rise of organized crime and a black market for alcohol. Prohibition was repealed in 1933 with the passage of the 21st Amendment, which allowed for the legal production and sale of alcohol once again.
To learn more about prohibition, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30478349
#SPJ1
which division of judaism emerge in the nineteenth century with a position mediating the extremes? while this division wished to show great respect
Conservative division of Judaism arose in the nineteenth 100 years with a position intervening in the limits. The Change development was a strong verifiable reaction to the sensational occasions of the eighteenth and nineteenth hundreds years in Europe.
Conservative and Change Judaism arose in nineteenth-century Germany as a work to alter the severity of Standard Judaism. Toward the finish of the nineteenth hundred years, Zionism has shown up as an outgrowth of change.
Judaism is portrayed by a faith in one extraordinary God who uncovered himself to Abraham, Moses, and the Jewish prophets and by a strict life as per Sacred writings and rabbinic practices.
Learn more about Judaism:
https://brainly.com/question/28209133
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Which division of Judaism emerged in the nineteenth century with a position mediating the extremes? While this division wished to show great respect for the rabbinical tradition of Judaism, it also wished to allow for greater latitude in matters of religious practice.
Consider your primary source reading "The Wealth and Commerce of Constantinople. " How is it possible to account for the prosperity that Benjamin of Tudela found in Constantinople?
Benjamin of Tudela claimed that Constantinople's success was a result of its advantageous location for trade and commerce, educational institutions, stable administration, and ethnic and religious variety.
What kind of source does Constantinople's wealth and trade come from?By the end of the first millennium AD, Constantinople had become the prosperous capital of a powerful empire, drawing in large numbers of foreign traders like a magnet.
Why was Constantinople a prosperous commercial hub?The Silk Road passed through Constantinople, which served as a hub for trade between Europe and Asia. The city attracted traders frequently because it was simple to defend, and as a result, both the city and the empire amassed enormous wealth.
To know more about religious visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/21090651
#SPJ1
What amendment protected all men’s ability to vote from discrimination
Answer:
Your answer is: 15th amendment
Explanation:
Is Joseph Howe’s name still relevant in today’s Canada?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Answer:
His name is still relevant in Canada.He was a prominent figure in the movement opposed to Confederation, yet later, as a federal Cabinet minister, played an important role in securing Manitoba's entry to Confederation. The Nova Scotian patriot par excellence, Howe could use his oratorical powers to influence his compatriots as no other man has ever done.
Explanation: Hope this helps mark me brainliest!! :))
after carrie chapman catt became president of the national american woman suffrage association in 1900, she sought to achieve the goal of women's suffrage in which of the follow ways?
After Carrie Chapman Catt became president of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in 1900, she sought to achieve the goal of women's suffrage in the following ways:
Carrie Chapman Catt sought to achieve the goal of women's suffrage by using the "winning plan." The winning plan consisted of convincing the state legislatures to grant women the right to vote through careful work and planning. This would be done through a combination of lobbying politicians, propaganda, and public speaking.
The right to vote for women was a long-fought battle in the United States, which was eventually won by the suffragists after years of fighting. The National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) was an organization that was focused on obtaining voting rights for women. They had been lobbying for the right to vote for women since the mid-19th century, and they had been met with strong resistance from many quarters. Carrie Chapman Catt was able to inspire the organization to adopt a new strategy for obtaining suffrage, which eventually helped them to be successful.
To know more about Woman Suffrage Association refer: https://brainly.com/question/9623059
#SPJ11
During the battle of britain germany switched from bombing raf targets to what new target? what was the result in this change of strategy
During the Battle of Britain, Germany shifted its bombing strategy from targeting RAF airfields and infrastructure to bombing cities and civilian populations. This shift in strategy is often referred to as the Blitz.
The Blitz began on September 7, 1940, and continued until May 1941. The German Air Force, or Luftwaffe, carried out intensive bombing raids on major British cities such as London, Coventry, and Liverpool, as well as other towns and ports. The aim of the Blitz was to break the morale of the British people and force them to surrender.
However, the strategy did not have the desired effect. The British people showed great resilience and courage in the face of the bombing, and the RAF was able to recover from its initial losses and continue to defend Britain.
The Blitz caused great damage and loss of life, but it did not succeed in breaking the spirit of the British people or forcing them to surrender. In fact, the Blitz had the opposite effect, strengthening the British resolve to resist the German invasion and win the war.
To know more about Germany here
https://brainly.com/question/9910016
#SPJ4
which sequence events bet describes the role of the textile maufacturing in initiating industrialization
The role of textile manufacturing in initiating industrialization was the introduction of the power loom in the late 18th century.
This machine allowed for the production of large quantities of fabric in shorter amounts of time. This increased production increased demand, resulting in the hiring of additional labor, the development of new methods of transportation, and the emergence of financial systems to facilitate industrial growth.
The power loom made it easier to produce large amounts of fabric in shorter amounts of time. This led to a surge in demand, and employers had to hire more labor to meet the needs of their consumers.
The need for a reliable way to transport materials and goods also increased, leading to the development of railways and other transport networks.
Finally, financial systems like the banking system emerged to help facilitate the growth of industrialization. All these factors worked together to spur the industrial revolution and launch a new era of economic development.
To know more about industrialization click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30311106#
#SPJ11
u.s. army lt. thomas e. selfridge became the first ever casualty of an airplane crash when he died in a 1908 test flight piloted by orville wright, at what location?
U.S. Army Lt. Thomas E. Selfridge became the first ever casualty of an airplane crash when he died in a 1908 test flight piloted by Orville Wright at Fort Myer, Virginia.
What was the cause of the accident?Orville Wright was flying a two-seater airplane, and Selfridge was his passenger.
After four minutes of flight, there was a problem with the airplane's controls, causing it to nosedive from an altitude of approximately 150 feet.
The crash severely injured Wright, and Selfridge died within hours from a fractured skull.
What was Thomas E. Selfridge’s job at the time of the airplane crash?Lieutenant Thomas E. Selfridge was a U.S. Army officer, and at the time of the airplane crash, he was serving as an officer in the U.S. Army Signal Corps.
Selfridge's father was also a US Army officer who had served in the American Civil War.
To know more about Orville Wright refer here
https://brainly.com/question/27588161#
#SPJ11
n your opinion, did the spanish effectively use the wealth they gained from the silver and gold brought back from the americas? why or why not?
In my opinion, the Spanish did not effectively use the wealth they gained from the silver and gold brought back from the Americas. Instead of investing it in productive activities or long-term infrastructure, they squandered it on luxurious lifestyles, wars, and religious art.
However, in some respects, the silver and gold brought back by the Spanish from the Americas had far-reaching effects. It enabled Spain to become the dominant power in Europe in the sixteenth century, allowing it to wage wars, build armies and navies, and commission artwork.
Spanish royalty was known for their extravagant lifestyles, and the money gained from the gold and silver brought back from the Americas was squandered on wars, luxury, and art. As a result, Spain's economy began to decline, and they became unable to compete with other
European powers who invested in more productive industries and infrastructure. In addition, the wealth extracted from the Americas resulted in an extreme concentration of power and wealth among the ruling elite, contributing to the exploitation and oppression of native peoples in the Americas.
The extraction of precious metals also caused hyperinflation, making life difficult for ordinary people, and ultimately leading to economic instability in Spain.
To know more about Spanish wealth here:
https://brainly.com/question/5229711#
#SPJ11
by the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the republican party. multiple choice question. multi-party system system of regional alliances variable-party system
By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new political system had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the Republican Party is Multi-party system, the correct option is (a).
The election saw the emergence of two major political parties: the Democratic Party, which supported Andrew Jackson, and the National Republican Party, which backed John Quincy Adams. This was a significant departure from the previous political landscape, which had been dominated by a single political party, the Democratic-Republican Party.
The emergence of multiple political parties marked the beginning of a multi-party system in the United States, which has since become a defining feature of American politics. The two-party system that emerged in 1828 has persisted to this day, with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party dominating American politics, the correct option is (a).
To learn more about Republican Party follow the link:
brainly.com/question/1204107
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the republican party. Multiple choice questions.
a. Multi-party system
b. System of regional alliances
c. Variable-party system
what was the significance of the second battle of the marne? how was this different from the first battle of the marne?
The Second Battle of the Marne (July 15-August 6, 1918) was an Allied victory that stopped the last German offensive on the Western Front in World War I.
It was a decisive victory that was different from the First Battle of the Marne (September 6-12, 1914) in two major ways.
First, the Second Battle of the Marne was fought on a much larger scale.
The Allies deployed more than 1.2 million troops, while the Germans had just 800,000. Secondly, the Second Battle of the Marne saw the first widespread use of tanks, planes, and artillery in a battle, whereas the First Battle of the Marne was fought primarily by infantry.
This resulted in significantly higher casualties for the Germans. The Second Battle of the Marne ultimately marked the end of the war on the Western Front and resulted in an Allied victory.
To know more about Battle of the Marne click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/509805#
#SPJ11
a.
7. What effect did the use of credit have on the US economy of the 1950s? aven
Boosted the economy by giving more purchasing power to consumers
b. Lowered the economy by reducing the availability of natural resources
Boosted the economy by causing an overproduction of goods
d. Lowered the economy by over-extending consumer budgets
C.
Correct answer is (A) Boosted the economy by giving more purchasing power to consumers.
Impact of use of credit -The use of credit had a significant impact on the US economy in the 1950s. It allowed consumers to purchase goods and services that they may not have been able to afford otherwise, which in turn fueled economic growth. By allowing consumers to make purchases on credit, there was more money being circulated in the economy, which contributed to increased demand for goods and services.
Additional consequences -Moreover, it encouraged industrial growth because businesses had more capital to invest in new technologies, machinery, and production methods to keep up with the increased demand. Financial institutions also benefitted from the widespread use of credit, as they earned interest on loans and generated profits from other financial products and services.
To know more about the impact of credit in US economy -
https://brainly.com/question/27753942
#SPJ1
- Part A: Briefly describe ONE perspective about politics in the 1830s expressed in the image.
- Part B: Briefly explain ONE specific event or development that led to the perspective expressed in the image.
- Part C: Briefly explain ONE specific effect of the political developments referenced by the image.
Based on this picture, one interpretation of politics in the 1830s is that Andrew Jackson behaved more like a king than a president.
How did Andrew Jackson view the relationship between the Union and the states?Jackson disliked national banks, so he withdrew all the money from it and transferred it to private institutions in the United States.
Jackson signed the specie circular, which required people to pay in gold in order to purchase public property. Despite the fact that the bank ran out of money and fell into a depression that sparked the Panic of 1837, the high demand for property was to blame.
Jackson believed that the Bank of the United States was an institution that was appointed, according to his interpretation of government authority as stated in his letter to Congress. As a result, people would not hold it accountable. According to Webster's definition of government, Jackson was criticizing a government agency.
To know more about Andrew Jackson, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27920494
#SPJ1
Explain how the Persian and Peloponnesian Wars eventually led to the conquest of Greece by the Macedonians.
The Peloponnesian War did indeed pave the way for Philip II. The war resulted in events directly and indirectly leading to Philip II’s conquest of Greece.
Indirectly: The power vacuum
The two rivals - Athens and Sparta - had beaten each other to exhaustion during the conflict. Moreover, their alliances - the Delian League and the Peloponnesian League - had been resolved. There were no superpowers for an aspiring contender to stay clear of any more. The former superpowers were now just that: Former.
Then there was Thebes, which briefly took over hegemony of Greece after decisively defeating the weakened Spartans at Leuctra and Mantinea. Thebes did not have the makings of Empire. Thebans were neither mariner Athenians nor badass Spartans. They just didn’t inspire anyone, not even their neighbors in the Boeotean League, to stay the course. Their brief hegemony had been the result of two charismatic leaders (Epaminondas and Pelopidas) perfectly timed with Sparta’s weakened state.
In other words, the coast was now clear for a new power like Macedon to rise up and take the lead.
Directly: The Macedonian Hostage
Before rising to the throne of Macedon, Philip had been held hostage in Thebes. As a young prince he was privileged and spent time with the likes of Epaminondas, Pelopidas and Pammenes. Their influence had probably been immense as he received military and diplomatic training from them. These were the very men who had innovated warfare with the Oblique Phalanx and the Sacred Band’s dense shock formation to beat Spartans at their own game.
Consequently, Philip knew every trick up their sleeve. More importantly, he had learned to innovate and change the paradigm. He was about to deliver Thebes the same blow Thebes had dealt the Spartans with a few innovations of his own. At the battle of Chaeronea 20 years later, the ex hostage-pupil-guest Philip would extinguish his former hosts’ hopes at hegemony once and for all.