3 ways in which the Soweto protists harmed their community?

Ian Mortimer's primary purpose in this passage is to highlight the significance of the cultural impact of the first king of England, Athelstan. Mortimer most clearly achieves this purpose through the use of various rhetorical strategies. The passage describes Athelstan's reign, which saw England emerge as a united nation-state.

Mortimer highlights the significance of this through his use of rhetorical questions that question the reader's understanding of England's origins and the role Athelstan played in them.

For example, Mortimer asks, "Did England begin in the fifth century with the departure of the Roman legions, or in the sixth century with the arrival of the Angles and Saxons, or in the ninth century with the Viking invasions?"

By posing these questions, Mortimer is challenging the reader to question their assumptions about the origins of England and recognize the cultural importance of Athelstan's reign. The use of a rhetorical question is a common literary device used to engage and persuade the reader.

Mortimer also uses vivid imagery, such as "tide of blood" and "three days of non-stop fighting," to create a sense of urgency and excitement around the events of Athelstan's reign. This technique is commonly referred to as imagery, and it is a powerful tool for creating a mental image in the reader's mind. The passage's structure is also important in achieving Mortimer's primary purpose.

He starts by asking a series of rhetorical questions and then goes on to describe Athelstan's reign in vivid detail. This technique is commonly referred to as the "hook" and "bridge" method, where the author hooks the reader with an interesting question or idea and then bridges to the main topic.

The passage's tone is also critical to achieving Mortimer's primary purpose.

His tone is informative and educational, but it is also enthusiastic and passionate about the subject matter. This tone helps to create a sense of excitement and interest around the subject and encourages the reader to learn more about Athelstan's reign and the origins of England.

To know more about united nation-state refer to-

brainly.com/question/17136740#
#SPJ11

Answer:

b and a

Explanation:

A good speech has a concise, pertinent message that is supported by evidence. To find a good speech is to recognize whether the speech aims to be both memorable and educational.

Despite the variety of public speeches, they can generally be divided into three groups based on their desired outcome: instructive, persuasive, and entertaining. The finest speeches have a clear, important message and a few excellent examples to support it. As a result, it's important to keep your speech straightforward and to have a distinct beginning, middle, and end.

Moreover, narrow your attention to just one theme while ignoring all others. An excellent speech contains a concise, pertinent message supplemented by anecdotes that make the subject being discussed more fascinating and remembered. The length of a speech is simply one aspect, though. A great speech must also capture the audience, be delivered confidently and effectively, and have a clear theme.

To learn more about speech, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28046765

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

FINDING GOOD SPEECH

hello everyone, is there anyone that could help me in my task, please I really need help asap, I hope that someone can serious to help me pls, I am struggle about this​, please help me asap! thank you!​

Answer: true

Explanation:

Dr. Mary Walker was a prisoner, prohibitionist, and feminist. She reminds Americans that women are just as directly accountable for the freedoms we take for granted as their male counterparts.

Together with her work in the army, she started to promote women's rights. Dr. Walker was well-known for wearing slacks and supporting "dress reform." Because she was disguised like a male, she was detained in New Orleans in 1870.

The Congressional Medal of Honor was given to Dr. Mary Walker as the first woman ever for her contributions as a surgeon during the American Civil War. In addition to being the first woman to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor, Dr. Mary Walker was a vocal supporter of women's rights.

To know more about Dr. Mary Walker visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/21807970

#SPJ1

The author uses rhetoric to advance the point of view that urban sprawl is one of the main causes of wildlife extinction in the United States by highlighting specific studies and explaining the increase in development over time. Therefore, the correct option is D.

Urban sprawl is one of the significant causes of wildlife extinction in the United States. The author of the article has advanced the point of view that urban sprawl is one of the major causes of wildlife extinction in the United States by using various rhetoric techniques such as highlighting specific studies and explaining the increase in development over time. Therefore, option D is correct.

According to the article, the urban sprawl is causing severe damage to the wildlife habitat, and it is one of the significant causes of wildlife extinction. The author has used various examples and data to support the argument. He also mentioned that the increasing population and the demand for urbanization are the primary causes of habitat loss. The article shows that urban sprawl is a growing concern in the United States, and it is causing severe damage to the environment and wildlife.

Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: In Sprawl Threatens Wildlife and Habitat, how does the author use rhetoric to advance the point of view that urban sprawl is one of the main causes of wildlife extinction in the United States? A) by discussing species-specific losses and the development projects that led to their demise. B) by including studies from activists about the insufficient legislation protecting animal habitats. C) by focusing on how much land is currently being developed for commercial and agricultural use. D) by highlighting specific studies and explaining the increase in development over time.

Learn more about Rhetoric:

https://brainly.com/question/24590045

#SPJ11

From the note card which is used by elias the clearly bibliographic Cutting-Edge Today, Junk Tomorrow: How Electronics Are Polluting Our World by Chhaya Kumar.

What is bibliography?

A bibliography is a list of the sources that an author used to produce a piece of writing. It goes along with almost all forms of academic writing, including essays, research papers, and reports.

When the author of a journalistic article, presentation, or video deems it necessary, you may also discover a brief, less formal bibliography at the end of the work.

The third option shows how the owner of what was cited was well referenced with his name and the work used.

To know more about bibliography visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24435074

#SPJ1

Answer:

On September 12, 1962, President John F. Kennedy delivered a speech at Rice University Stadium in Houston, Texas, in which he declared his intention to send a man to the moon. In his speech, Kennedy acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the time and cost of this endeavor, but insisted that the exploration of space was necessary for progress and leadership in the world. Kennedy emphasized the importance of knowledge, progress, and strength, and noted that despite the vast increase in scientific knowledge and manpower, there were still vast unknowns to explore. He also pointed out that the United States needed to take a leading role in space exploration in order to prevent it from being governed by a hostile flag of conquest, and that it was important to use new knowledge and rights for the progress of all people. Kennedy acknowledged the high cost of the space program, but argued that it was worth the investment for the benefits that would come from exploring space. He famously declared, "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard." Kennedy's speech is considered a landmark moment in American history, as it set the goal that led to the successful Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969.

Explanation:

BRAINLIEST PLEASE!

Answer:

Explanation:

Based on what you've shared, it seems that the purpose of President Kennedy's speech at Rice University in 1962 was to build public support for his proposal to land a man on the Moon before the end of the decade. By speaking at a university known for its expertise in science and technology, Kennedy likely aimed to inspire and rally the academic and scientific community behind his vision for space exploration, while also appealing to the broader public's sense of national pride and curiosity about the unknown. The speech also aimed to reassure Americans that their government was committed to advancing the country's scientific and technological capabilities, especially in the midst of the Cold War.

The text is about the hobby of the president's wife of the Philippines, Imelda Marcos, who loved to buy shoes and had 3,000 pairs of shoes. Therefore, the correct answer is B.

Imelda Marcos, the wife of the previous president of the Philippines, was well-known for her expensive hobby of purchasing shoes, which is the subject of the text. The luxuries of her lifestyle and her wasteful spending tendencies are highlighted by the fact that she had collected a collection of 3,000 pairs of shoes. Her collection of shoes came to represent her excess and extravagance at a time when many Filipinos were living in poverty. The narrative is more about Imelda Marcos' personal habits and reputation than it is about shopping in general or the kinds of shoes marketed in the Philippines. Her shoe collection has gained notoriety and been the focus of books, movies, and even a museum display.

To know more about president, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25822980

#SPJ4

2. Hilton's response to Durmont's question of "how much" reveal his point of view of his own abilities in that it shows that he values his work beyond money.

3. The fact that Durmont waited so long to ask Hilton’s name suggest about his point of view is that he didn’t think Hilton was important until he helped.

As a part of the compilation book "The Upward Road," Lottie Burrel Dixon's little literary piece titled "His Motto" was made available. John Durmont, who was duped into admitting to being physically bankrupt, serves as the narrative's main character.

In "His Motto," however, he took the suggestion to travel to the Maine forest, so there was still a way out. to his surprise, he enjoyed it. It implies that there is a character in the narrative who toils away while waiting for an opportunity to present itself. This shows how bias inhibits people from appreciating others' humanity and worth.

4. He can offer Hilton the opportunity that his hard work has earned him.

To learn more about point of view, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11983141

#SPJ1

Answer:

Leather workers

Explanation:

Based on the use of comparison context clue "Leather workers" infer the word curriers means in this passage.

Who is leather workers here?

The passage is describing the skill and expertise of ancient workers who prepared leather for various purposes in ancient Egypt during the reign of Cleopatra, which is estimated to be between three and four thousand years ago. The passage notes that these workers used a knife in the leather preparation process that was similar to the one used by modern curriers. Curriers are skilled workers who specialize in the finishing and preparation of leather. They use a variety of tools and techniques to clean, dye, and treat leather to make it more durable and suitable for various purposes, such as clothing, furniture, and footwear. The passage is describing the skill and expertise of ancient workers who prepared leather for various purposes in ancient Egypt during the reign of Cleopatra, which is estimated to be between three and four thousand years ago.

Know more about Leather workers Visit:

brainly.com/question/31082018

#SPJ1

Tom's version is different from Mayella's because Tom said that Mayella was hugging and kissing him. Tom wasn't doing anything, and he told Mayella to let him out of the house.

Mayella told a different story than Tom since Tom said Mayella was kissing and holding him. Tom asked Mayella to let him leave the house because he was doing nothing. Mr. Ewell suddenly showed up at the window and began yelling at Tom. After that, Tom hurriedly left the house.

The story To Kill a Mockingbird explores how good and evil may coexist inside a single community or individual while also telling the story of a young girl coming of age and a darker drama about the causes and effects of racism and prejudice.

Learn more about Tom at:

https://brainly.com/question/5572276

#SPJ1

Professor Higgins appears to be targeting the lower-class traits of Eliza's speech. The reason why Eliza is training to reduce these traits is that they are not considered acceptable by the upper class and can limit her opportunities to advance in society.

Eliza's speech was heavily influenced by her upbringing in a lower-class environment. Her accent, pronunciation, and vocabulary were all characteristic of someone from the lower classes. This is not acceptable in high society, and this is where Professor Higgins comes in to help her improve her speech to be able to integrate better into upper-class society. Eliza is training to reduce these traits to fit into high society and make the people there feel more comfortable around her.

She has to learn to speak correctly, to use the proper vocabulary and to be eloquent in her speech. Eliza also knows that her accent and speech patterns are limiting her opportunities to advance in society. She is aware that to improve her chances of success, she needs to reduce these traits and learn to speak like a lady. In conclusion,

know more about speech here

https://brainly.com/question/29769492#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The theme of "Does Time Pass" by Peter Dizikes is the nature of time and how it affects our lives. The poem explores the idea that time is relative and that it can expand or contract depending on our perception. The poem also discusses the paradoxical nature of time, as time can seem to stand still, even though it is constantly moving. The poem ultimately suggests that the only way to truly understand and appreciate time is to live in the present.

Explanation:

Hope this right answer...

Answer:

because

Explanation:

because

Dana initially appears to have a harder time adjusting to life in the past, as she is black and must deal with the additional pressure of being a slave. Kevin, on the other hand, is white, so he does not have to deal with the same level of racial discrimination that Dana does.

Dana is visibly disturbed by the scene, and her reaction is to physically attack the white man playing the auctioneer. Kevin remains calm and rational, recognizing that they are in a different time and that this is the way things were done at the time. This event reveals that Dana is a very strong-willed and impulsive person, while Kevin is more measured and reasonable.

Dana and Kevin's experiences in the past differ significantly. Dana initially appears to have a harder time adjusting to life in the past, as she is black and must deal with the additional pressure of being a slave. Kevin, on the other hand, is white, so he does not have to deal with the same level of racial discrimination that Dana does, which makes him appear to adapt more easily to life in the past.

In the book Kindred by Octavia Butler, when Dana and Kevin witness a group of slave children acting out the scene of a slave auction, Dana is visibly disturbed by the scene, and her reaction is to physically attack the white man playing the auctioneer.

In contrast, Kevin remains calm and rational, recognizing that they are in a different time and that this is the way things were done at the time. This event reveals that Dana is a very strong-willed and impulsive person, while Kevin is more measured and reasonable. Furthermore, it demonstrates how differently they have adapted to their new surroundings.

In conclusion, the novel Kindred by Octavia Butler provides an insightful look at how two people can experience the same event differently based on their backgrounds, experiences, and personalities. The scene in which Dana and Kevin witness the slave auction is just one example of how they experience the past differently.

For more such questions on racial discrimination, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/19908071

#SPJ11

The author mentions that they discovered that the ship was broken into two and the back part of the ship was missing

The globe awoke to terrible news on a morning in April of 1912. Large and opulent "unsinkable" new ocean liner R.M.S. Titanic sank after colliding with an iceberg. Because the Titanic did not carry enough lifeboats, more than 1,500 people perished in the icy North Atlantic. Everyone was asking themselves, "How could this happen?The Titanic once more made headlines on September 1, 1985. The fabled missing ship had been located that morning by a French-American expedition under the direction of Dr. Robert Ballard. Two and a half kilometres below the surface of the water, the Titanic had been discovered standing erect on the sea floor.In the summer of 1986, Robert Ballard and his crew visited the Titanic once more.

To know more about Titanic, on the link :

https://brainly.com/question/29467365

#SPJ1

Answer:

"Dichotomies" refer to contrasts or oppositions between two things or concepts. It is a literary device that is commonly used in poetry to create tension or highlight themes.

In the novel "The Poet X" by Elizabeth Acevedo, there are several dichotomies that play a significant role in the story. Here are some examples:

Silence vs. Voice: The main character, Xiomara, struggles with finding her voice and speaking up for herself. She is often silenced by her mother's strict religious beliefs and her own fear of judgment. Throughout the novel, Xiomara learns to embrace her voice and use it to express herself through poetry.

Tradition vs. Modernity: Xiomara's parents are immigrants from the Dominican Republic and hold onto their traditional values and customs. Xiomara, on the other hand, is a first-generation American who is influenced by modern American culture. This clash between tradition and modernity creates tension in Xiomara's relationships with her parents.

The work discussed in the question is “A very old man with enormous wings” by Gabriel Garcia Marquez.

In Gabriel Garcia Marquez's "A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings," the old man undergoes several physical transformations throughout the story. At the beginning of the story, the old man is introduced as having enormous wings, which causes him to be mistaken for an angel. However, his appearance is not what one would expect of an angel as his wings are dirty, and scraggly, and seem to be more like those of a scavenger bird than of a majestic angel.

As the story progresses, the old man's physical condition deteriorates. For instance, when he is first captured, the old man is confined to a chicken coop where he is exposed to the elements and suffers from cold, hunger, and neglect. In this state, the old man becomes "so soiled that it was hard to tell what his original colours were," which is an indication of his worsening condition.

Moreover, the old man's wings begin to lose their feathers, which makes them appear even more unimpressive. When the priest comes to see the old man, he observes that "the feathers of his wings were becoming plucked out." This further indicates the physical deterioration of the old man's wings and serves to emphasize his declining state.

Finally, towards the end of the story, the old man's wings fall off completely, leaving him as a vulnerable, powerless, and ordinary old man. This transformation represents the loss of his special and mysterious identity and highlights the cruelty and indifference of the townspeople towards him. Overall, the old man's physical transformations serve to underscore the theme of human indifference and the transient nature of physical appearances.

To learn more about Gabriel Garcia Marquez, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30860150

#SPJ1

Answer:I think A

Explanation:

C. banquo has been slain

The best business definition of a "contract" is "any legally binding and legally enforceable promise, or set of promises, between two or more competent parties".  Therefore, the correct option is A.

A contract is an agreement between two or more parties to do or not do something. It is a legally enforceable arrangement that, if violated, can result in damages or other legal action. A contract is an agreement between two or more competent parties that sets out each party's legal rights and obligations.

Contracts can be written or verbal, formal or informal, and have varying degrees of legal complexity. Contracts may be in written form or may be an implied agreement. The terms of the contract are enforced by law, and any violation of the agreement may result in legal consequences.

The main purpose of a contract is to establish an agreement between parties. Contracts ensure that all parties understand their obligations and that any promises made are kept. By requiring certain provisions in contracts, such as warranties and guarantees, the law helps protect consumers from fraud and ensures that goods and services are delivered as promised.

Learn more about Contract:

https://brainly.com/question/984979

#SPJ11

Answer:

As a student, I would say that Christopher McCandless would have appreciated "The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost. McCandless was known for his non-conformist, adventurous spirit, and the themes in the poem align with his philosophy of forging his own path in life. The idea of taking the road less traveled and making choices that lead to a different outcome would have resonated with him, as evidenced by his decision to leave behind his conventional life and venture into the Alaskan wilderness.

The line "I doubted if I should ever come back" also speaks to McCandless's willingness to take risks and leave behind familiar paths. He was known for his nomadic lifestyle and his willingness to go off the beaten path, and the poem echoes this sentiment.

As for whether or not the poem connects with me personally, I think it does. I appreciate the idea of taking risks and making choices that lead to a different outcome. The poem encourages readers to embrace the unknown and to forge their own way in life, which is a message that I find inspiring.

Even though he doesn't deliver the narration, the Time Traveler is the main character in The Time Machine. He is a well-known but eccentric British scientist who builds a time machine to journey into the future because he is fascinated by time travel.

The Time Traveler is a sympathetic character despite his weaknesses. He is the primary character, therefore it only makes sense that the reader would feel sorry for him. As his dinner guests pay close attention, he talks about the relationship between space and time, displaying his seeming intellect.

A scientist who is knowledgeable and perceptive. Like Wells, he is definitely a Darwinist who is well-versed in the theories of the day, and many of his thoughts about the Britain of his day can be found in his writings.

The Time Traveler is primarily driven by scientific curiosity and a desire to learn more about the world. As an illustration, after escaping the Morlocks, he resolves to go into the future to witness how the world would end.

Learn more about The Time Machine: https://brainly.com/question/27973693

#SPJ1

The details that support the central idea that the men on the expedition had to cope with isolation and hardship are:

"We wished one another a merry Christmas, and our thoughts went back to those at home." This shows that the men were away from their families and loved ones during the holiday season, indicating their isolation.

"We sat down to our 'lunch' of stale, thin bannock and a mug of thin cocoa." This shows that the men were not getting proper meals or nutrition, indicating the hardship they had to face during the expedition.

Read more about supporting details here:

https://brainly.com/question/884525

#SPJ1

Answer:

I shall go | because he has invited me.

Main clause | Subordinate clause

Explanation:

The sentence "I shall go because he has invited me" contains two clauses:

Main clause "I shall go"

This is an independent clause that stands alone as a complete sentence. It contains a subject "I" and a predicate "shall go". The main clause expresses the main idea of the sentence.

Subordinate clause "because he has invited me"

This is a dependent clause that cannot stand alone as a sentence. It starts with the subordinating conjunction "because" and contains a subject "he" and a predicate "has invited me". The subordinate clause functions as an adverb in the sentence and modifies the main clause by giving a reason for the speaker's action.

The sentence is a complex sentence because it contains one main clause and one subordinate clause. The main clause can stand alone as a complete sentence, but the subordinate clause cannot. The subordinate clause adds information to the main clause by providing a reason for the speaker's action.

The process that involves translating a message into a new language and then back into the original language so that the original message and the second translation can be compared is known as "double translating".

Double translating, also known as "back-translation," is a translation method that involves translating a message from one language into another and then translating it back into the original language so that the two translations can be compared for accuracy.

This technique is used by translation and localization professionals to assess the quality and accuracy of the translations they create by comparing the two translations to identify and correct any errors or inconsistencies that may exist.

In many instances, double translation is used to ensure the highest possible accuracy when translating technical or legal documents, product manuals, marketing materials, and other materials that require precise and reliable translations. It is also an excellent method for validating translation accuracy and identifying potential language or cultural barriers that may exist.

Learn more about translation at https://brainly.com/question/900753

#SPJ11

The classic struggle that Gilgamesh and Enkidu represent is "nature versus civilization".  

The story of Gilgamesh is an ancient Sumerian legend about a ruler named Gilgamesh. He had a companion named Enkidu. The latter was created by the gods as a wild man to teach Gilgamesh humility.

Gilgamesh is a legendary character from Sumerian mythology who is two-thirds divine and one-third human. Enkidu, who appears to be a hunter and wild man, was created by the gods to be Gilgamesh's companion. Enkidu and Gilgamesh battle monsters and undertake epic journeys in their attempts to find answers to life's deepest questions.

Learn more about Gilgamesh at https://brainly.com/question/1462971

#SPJ11

Answer:

B. Mass Japanese relocation was justified because there was no time to separate the guilty from the innocent.

Explanation: