A. The appellate court can only set aside the trial judge's findings of fact if they are clearly erroneous.
The general principle is that appellate courts are deferential to the findings of fact made by the trial judge. This means that appellate courts will not lightly disturb the trial judge's findings of fact, as the trial judge is considered to have had the advantage of hearing and observing the witnesses firsthand and assessing their credibility.
However, appellate courts do have the authority to set aside the trial judge's findings of fact in certain circumstances, including when they are found to be clearly erroneous.
The term "clearly erroneous" is a legal standard used by appellate courts to determine the circumstances under which they can set aside a trial judge's findings of fact.
A finding of fact is considered clearly erroneous if it is clearly and demonstrably against the weight of the evidence, or if the reviewing court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.
In other words, the appellate court must have a high level of certainty that the trial judge's findings of fact are incorrect in order to set them aside.
The standard of "clearly erroneous" is a high bar for appellate courts to meet. It reflects the general principle that the trial judge, who has presided over the trial and heard the evidence, is in the best position to make findings of fact.
Appellate courts are generally reluctant to substitute their judgment for that of the trial judge on issues of fact, and will only do so in exceptional cases where the trial judge's findings are clearly and demonstrably incorrect.
To learn more about appellate court, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30962544
#SPJ11
______ theory believes that law violators may have suffered damage to their personalities early in their development that renders them powerless to control their impulses.
The theory that believes that law violators may have suffered damage to their personalities early in their development that renders them powerless to control their impulses is the "psychodynamic theory".
The psychodynamic theory is a psychological perspective that emphasizes the role of early childhood experiences and unconscious motives in shaping behavior. This theory suggests that personality is shaped by the interactions between the id, ego, and superego, which are three components of the psyche that represent different aspects of our personality.
According to this theory, individuals who engage in criminal behavior may have experienced traumatic events or disruptions in their early development that have compromised their ability to regulate their impulses and behaviors. These individuals may have unresolved psychological conflicts or repressed emotions that lead them to act out in ways that violate the law.
learn more about psychodynamic theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/7804684
#SPJ4
how is federalism seen throughtout the judical branch?
Answer:
interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed
Explanation:
The judiciary is such a body that interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed. Besides, in federal states, disputes between the Centre and States are common and natural. The judiciary also resolves the disputes between the Centre and States as well as between the States.
e Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 is applicable to all sales agreements concluded in South Africa is True or false
True. The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 applies to all sales agreements concluded in South Africa, including agreements between businesses and consumers, as well as agreements between two businesses.
What is the Consumer Protection Act about?The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 is a South African law that seeks to protect the rights of consumers by regulating business practices and promoting fair, transparent, and equitable dealings between consumers and suppliers. The Act came into effect on 1 April 2011.
Some of the key provisions of the Consumer Protection Act include:
Consumer rights: The Act guarantees certain rights to consumers, such as the right to fair and honest marketing, the right to receive goods and services that are of good quality, and the right to safe products.Prohibited conduct: The Act prohibits certain business practices, such as false or misleading advertising, fraudulent or unconscionable conduct, and unfair contract terms.Product liability: The Act holds suppliers responsible for any harm caused by defective or unsafe products.Consumer protection agencies: The Act provides for the establishment of various consumer protection agencies, such as the National Consumer Commission, to enforce the provisions of the Act and protect consumers.Dispute resolution: The Act provides for various mechanisms for resolving disputes between consumers and suppliers, such as mediation and arbitration.Learn more about Consumer Protection Act here: https://brainly.com/question/14952903
#SPJ1
in an emergency situation, lori render said to mike, who needs help. mike would most likely be prohibited from suing lori for negligence under:
In an emergency situation, Lori Render said to Mike, "who needs help." If Mike was injured while receiving help from Lori, he would most likely be prohibited from suing her for negligence under the Good Samaritan laws.
Good Samaritan laws are laws that protect individuals who provide assistance to those who are injured or in danger from being sued for negligence. These laws vary by state, but they are generally designed to encourage people to provide assistance without fear of legal repercussions. However, there are limitations to Good Samaritan laws, and they do not provide blanket immunity from all types of lawsuits. For example, if Lori acted with gross negligence or intentional misconduct, she could still be held liable for any harm caused to Mike.The legal concept that may apply to Lori Render's actions is called "Good Samaritan" laws. These laws are intended to protect individuals who voluntarily provide assistance to those in need during emergency situations from being sued for negligence.
Learn more about emergency situations here:
https://brainly.com/question/31109378
#SPJ11
The Rhode Island state legislature enacts a law that violates the U.S. Constitution. This law can be enforced by
a.no one.
b.the federal government only.
c.the state of Pennsylvania only.
d.the United States Supreme Court only.
The Rhode Island state legislature enacts a law that violates the United States Constitution. This law can be enforced by no one. Option A is the correct answer.
The state legislature of the United States state of Rhode Island is called the State of Rhode Island General Assembly. It is a bicameral legislature made up of the upper Rhode Island Senate, which has 38 senators, and the lower Rhode Island House of Representatives, which has 75 representatives. Option A is the correct answer.
The General Assembly, led by the Country Party, rejected requests to join the newly established federal government more than ten years after the war, emphasizing its requests that a Bill of Rights be incorporated into the new federal U.S. Constitution and its aversion to slavery. The General Assembly gave in after considering a Bill of Rights and receiving a threat from the growing federal government of the United States that it would start taxing exports of products from Rhode Island if it did not join the union. Option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about Legislature here:
https://brainly.com/question/14530287
#SPJ4
In order to qualify for a liquor license, an applicant must prove, at minimum, all of the following except...
an applicant must prove all of these
no past abuse of alcohol
good character
not a party to any pending civil litigation
no prior felony convictions
In order to qualify for a liquor license, an applicant must prove all of the following: good character, no past abuse of alcohol, not a party to any pending civil litigation, and no prior felony convictions.
These requirements are put in place to ensure that those who are given the privilege of selling and serving alcohol are responsible and trustworthy individuals who will not put the public at risk.
Good character is essential for those who are going to be in the alcohol business. This means that they have a history of making ethical and moral decisions, and are generally respected in their community. Past abuse of alcohol is also important to consider since it could indicate a lack of responsibility or potential risk for future alcohol-related incidents.
Not being a party to any pending civil litigation is also a requirement, as it shows that the applicant is not currently facing any legal issues that could affect their ability to responsibly serve alcohol.
No prior felony convictions are required to ensure that the applicant does not have a history of serious criminal activity that could put the public at risk.
Learn more about liquor license here:
https://brainly.com/question/4982619
#SPJ4
a contract for car insurance is governed by: group of answer choices the restatement of torts all of the answers are correct the uniform commercial code common law
Heavy construction equipment and farm equipment are commonly referred to as__
Answer:
heavy machinery or Earthmover
Explanation:
Hope this helps
it is the responsibility of infosec professionals to understand state laws and standards. ____________ (True or False)
True. It is the responsibility of infosec professionals to understand state laws and standards. With the increasing number of cyber threats and data breaches, the importance of information security has grown significantly. The role of an infosec professional is to ensure the security and integrity of an organization's information assets.
To achieve this, they must have a comprehensive understanding of state laws and standards that regulate the handling and protection of sensitive data.
State laws and standards vary from one jurisdiction to another. For instance, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union differs from the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United States.
Infosec professionals must be aware of the legal requirements that apply to their organization's operations, including data collection, storage, and processing. They must also stay up-to-date with changes to these laws and standards to ensure compliance.
Failure to comply with state laws and standards can result in legal and financial consequences for the organization. Infosec professionals play a critical role in mitigating these risks by implementing appropriate security measures and ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.
Therefore, it is essential for infosec professionals to understand state laws and standards and their implications for their organization's information security practices.
To know more about financial consequences refer here
https://brainly.com/question/13174505#
#SPJ11
according to the textbook, ______ are the type of vehicle most often stolen.
according to the textbook the most frequently stolen vehicles in 2020 were the Honda Civic, Honda Accord, and Chevrolet Pickup (full-size).
It's important to note that the most commonly stolen vehicles can vary depending on the region, country, and time period being considered.
In addition to the NICB's recommendations, there are several other steps that car owners can take to prevent their vehicles from being stolen. These include:
Installing a vehicle tracking system: A tracking system can help locate a stolen vehicle and increase the chances of recovery.
Using a steering wheel lock: A steering wheel lock can deter thieves by making it more difficult to drive the car.
Installing an immobilizer: An immobilizer prevents the car from starting without the correct key, making it more difficult for thieves to steal the vehicle.
Parking in a garage or well-lit area: Parking in a secure location can reduce the likelihood of theft, especially if the area is well-lit and visible to others.
Removing valuables from the car: Leaving valuables in plain sight can attract thieves, so it's important to remove them or store them out of sight.
Using common sense: Finally, using common sense can go a long way in preventing car theft. This includes locking the car, taking the keys with you, and not leaving the car running unattended.
learn more about NICB here:
https://brainly.com/question/31108535
#SPJ11
Name the agency of the Department of Justice charged with enforcing laws against narcotics trafficking.a. NCIC b. Secret Service c. DEA d. SSA
C. DEA agency of the Department of Justice charged with enforcing laws against narcotics trafficking.
The Drug Enforcement Administration is primarily a federal law enforcement organization in the United States that reports to the Department of Justice and is responsible for countering illicit drug trafficking and shipping within the country.
The DEA is America's tenacious combatant against the illicit supply of drugs. DEA Special Agents are on the hunt for the most notorious drug trafficking and narco-terrorist organizations that pose a threat to our country. Special Agent responsibilities include collecting and organizing evidence to assist in the prosecution of serious violators of US drug laws.
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is a single-mission body tasked with enforcing drug prohibitions. The ATF's primary mission is to enforce federal weapons laws and to investigate arson and bombs. In scenarios in which our jurisdictions overlap, the FBI collaborates extensively with both agencies.
learn more about the DEA agency here:
https://brainly.com/question/29453276
#SPJ4
the takings clause states that the government may not seize private property. true or false
The statement that "the takings clause states that the government may not seize private property" is false.
The Takings Clause, found in the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,states that the government can seize private property for public use, but only if it provides just compensation to the owner.
This process is known as eminent domain.Eminent domain allows the government to acquire private property for public purposes, such as building infrastructure, utilities, or other public projects.
However, the government must ensure that the property owner is fairly compensated for their loss.
The goal is to balance the need for public projects with the protection of individual property rights, ensuring that property owners are not unfairly burdened.
To know more about private property r here:
https://brainly.com/question/30388178#
#SPJ11
all but three states have enacted some type of medical tort reform, which generally caps the amount of noneconomic damages an injured plaintiff can recover in a lawsuit. True or false?
True, all states with the exception of three have passed some form for medical tort reform.
The term "medical tort reform" refers to modifications to the civil legal system intended to cut down on medical malpractice claims and set a ceiling on the amount of non-economic damages that an injured plaintiff may be awarded.
Rewards for suffering, discomfort, and emotional anguish are examples of noneconomic damages, which can be challenging to measure. The intention is to regulate the expenses of malpractice litigation and ultimately lower healthcare costs by imposing caps on these awards.
The three states of the state of Kentucky, New York City, and Pennsylvania are the only ones to not have passed such reforms. The goal of these policies varies by state but generally aims to reduce the burden that medical malpractice lawsuits place on the healthcare system.
Learn more about malpractice here:
https://brainly.com/question/25441985
#SPJ4
felippe, a 17-year-old high school senior, is very talkative, intelligent, assertive, and politically conservative. research suggests that he would be most likely to develop a close friendship with
Due to his talkativeness, intelligence, assertiveness, and political conservatism, Felippe is most likely to form a deep bond with someone who holds similar beliefs.
Felippe, being talkative, intelligent, assertive, and politically conservative, would be most likely to develop a close friendship with someone who shares similar political views and values. As political beliefs often play a significant role in shaping one's personality and outlook on life, having friends who share similar beliefs can create a sense of comfort and belonging. Additionally, Felippe's assertiveness and talkative nature may lead him to seek out friends who are equally confident and outspoken, allowing for dynamic and engaging conversations.
Learn more about conservatism here
https://brainly.com/question/21091950
#SPJ11
Based on research, Felippe is likely to develop a close friendship with individuals who share similar traits and interests.
In this case, Felipe's talkative and assertive nature may attract outgoing individuals who enjoy engaging in stimulating conversations. Additionally, Felipe's intelligence may draw in like-minded individuals who enjoy discussing current events or academic topics.
Felippe's political conservatism may also play a role in his choice of friends. Research has shown that individuals often form friendships with others who share their political beliefs and values.
Therefore, Felippe may be more likely to befriend other politically conservative individuals.
Overall, Felipe's personality traits and interests are likely to attract individuals who share similar characteristics, including being talkative, intelligent, assertive, and politically conservative.
It is important to note that these are only generalizations based on research, and individual friendships are influenced by many factors beyond personality traits and interests.
to know more about friendship refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31234166#
#SPJ11
Why is it important to know how to write well as a Criminal Justice Professional or Law Enforcement Officer
Answer: "Poor writing affects the prosecution of cases and reflects poorly on both the individual officer and on the department".
Explanation:
Answer:
Its important to know how to write as those because gramar is everything and these job placement are very straightforward and strategic.
Explanation:
Up
The buyer of stolen goods receives good title if he or she did not know the goods were stolen. True or False?
The buyer of stolen goods receives a good title if he or she did not know the goods were stolen is False.
The captain agreed to hand over the items on a condition, and if that requirement is not met, the buyer will be liable. If an owner of commodities is prevented from opposing the seller's permission to sell by the behavior, the buyer obtains a valid title.
To obtain a good title via estoppel, however, it must be demonstrated that the original owner deliberately endured or held out the buyer in question because a person authorized to sell the goods.
When the items are in a deliverable state & the seller gives the buyer notice, ownership/property in the goods is said that it has been transferred through the seller to the buyer. The seller retains possession of the item until it is no longer deliverable.
learn more about stolen goods here:
https://brainly.com/question/15178848
#SPJ4
In cases where the convicted is convicted of two or more charges, and the judges sentences begin on the same day and are completed when the longest term is served it is called a: concurrent sentence (true o r false)
Answer:
concurrent sentence
Explanation:
A concurrent sentence refers to a type of sentence judges are able to give defendants convicted of more than one crime. Instead of serving each sentence one after another, a concurrent sentence allows the defendant to serve all of their sentences at the same time, where the longest period of time is controlling.
A §351 deferral is only available when a single shareholder transfers property for a controlling stock interest in a corporation. true or false?
False. A Section 351 deferral under the Internal Revenue Code is available when a shareholder transfers property to a corporation in exchange for stock, and it can apply to both single and multiple shareholders.
Under Section 351, the transfer of property to a corporation is not taxable if the transfer is made in exchange for stock in the corporation, and if immediately after the transfer, the transferor and other persons who transfer property to the corporation (if any) own at least 80% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote and at least 80% of the total number of shares of all other classes of stock of the corporation.
Therefore, it is not necessary for a single shareholder to transfer property for a controlling stock interest in a corporation to qualify for a Section 351 deferral. Multiple shareholders can transfer property to the corporation and still qualify for the deferral if the 80% ownership requirement is met.
learn more about Section 351 here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788745
#SPJ4
It is true that a §351 deferral is only available when a single shareholder transfers property for a controlling stock interest in a corporation.
A §351 deferral is available when one or more shareholders transfer property to a corporation in exchange for stock, and the transferors are in control of the corporation immediately after the exchange. The control requirement is met if the transferors own at least 80% of the total combined voting power and 80% of the total number of shares of all other classes of stock. It is not limited to a single shareholder.
Know more about §351 deferral here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788745
#SPJ11
in 1929, hoover sought to ease the plight of farmers, what legislation did hoover urge congress to pass and to establish to help farmers?
In 1929, President Herbert Hoover urged Congress to pass the Agricultural Marketing Act, also known as the "Farm Relief Bill."
This legislation established the Federal Farm Board, which was designed to help farmers by stabilizing agricultural prices and promoting the marketing of agricultural products.
The Farm Board was authorized to make loans to farmers' cooperative organizations and to buy and sell agricultural products in an effort to stabilize prices. However, the act did not provide direct subsidies to farmers, which some agricultural groups had been hoping for.
The Agricultural Marketing Act was a response to the severe economic crisis faced by farmers in the 1920s, which was characterized by falling commodity prices, overproduction, and mounting debt.
Many farmers were unable to pay their mortgages and loans, and they faced foreclosures and bankruptcies. The goal of the act was to help farmers by providing them with the means to organize and market their products more effectively, which would lead to higher prices and increased income.
Learn more about Agricultural Marketing Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/874289
#SPJ4
In 1929, Hoover sought to ease the plight of farmers by urging Congress to pass the Agricultural Marketing Act. This legislation aimed to stabilize farm prices and establish the Federal Farm Board to assist farmers with marketing their products.
In 1929, as a response to the economic hardships facing farmers, President Hoover urged Congress to pass the Agricultural Marketing Act. This legislation aimed to establish a Federal Farm Board, which would provide assistance to farmers by stabilizing prices and promoting the marketing of agricultural products. The board would also provide loans to farmers to help them with their agricultural operations. Ultimately, the act was intended to alleviate the economic struggles of farmers by supporting the agricultural industry as a whole.
Know more about Federal Farm Board here:
https://brainly.com/question/31140834
#SPJ11
a law changed after the contract was arranged but before the full performance of the contract. the law prohibits the transaction from taking place. this would be an example of
Answer:
Impossibility
Explanation:
T/F : aristotle was the first philosopher to develop a complex ethical philosophy related to the ideas of natural law theory
The statement "Aristotle was the first philosopher to develop a complex ethical philosophy related to the ideas of natural law theory" is true. He believed that morality was not just a set of rules or guidelines but rather a natural part of human life that could be discovered through observation and reason.
According to Aristotle, natural law theory held that there were certain basic principles or values that were inherent in the world and that could be discovered through rational inquiry. These principles included things like justice, equality, and the common good, and they formed the foundation of his ethical philosophy.
Aristotle's natural law theory was based on the idea that humans have a natural tendency to seek happiness and fulfillment and that these goals could only be achieved through living a virtuous life. He believed that virtues were habits or dispositions that enabled individuals to act in accordance with natural law principles and that these virtues could be developed through practice and habituation.
Overall, Aristotle's ethical philosophy represented a significant departure from earlier moral theories and has had a lasting impact on Western philosophical thought.
To know more about Aristotle refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28928819#
#SPJ11
policies and practices intended to focus on health promotion and disease prevention should
MULTIPLE CHOICE1. In 1990, Congress enacted the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. This Act does not:a.encourage the federal agencies to use arbitration.b.authorize federal agencies to use mediation and conciliation.c.require the agencies to use alternative dispute resolution.d.All of the above
This Act does not C. require the agencies to use alternative dispute resolution.
The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1990 (ADRA) provided a statutory framework for the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) by federal agencies. The ADRA recognized the usefulness of and promoted federal agencies to use, alternative conflict resolution methods.
Mostly based on reforms urged by many observers, particularly ACUS in multiple formal suggestions to Congress and agencies. These procedures, which have been increasingly used by states that courts, and business bodies in recent years, allow parties to bring their knowledge.
Mediation, conciliation, a hearing, minitrials, investigating facts, earlier neutral evaluation, settlement justices, ombuds, and other similar approaches are becoming more popular in settling administrative issues.
Learn more about Administrative Dispute Resolution Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/14978941
#SPJ4
how does communismm, facism or nationalism challenge the existing political and or social order
Due to the divergent societal visions that each of these ideologies aspires to advance, there may be tensions and conflicts with pre-existing social and political systems.
Communism, fascism, and nationalism are all political ideologies that can challenge the existing political and social order in different ways.
Communism, for example, challenges the existing order by advocating for the abolition of private property and a classless society. This directly challenges the capitalist system and can lead to tensions between those who support communism and those who support capitalism. Additionally, communism often advocates for the centralization of power in the state, which can challenge existing political systems that are based on democratic principles.
Fascism, on the other hand, challenges the existing order by promoting extreme nationalism and a strong authoritarian leader. This can lead to tensions with existing political systems that are based on individual freedoms and democratic principles. Fascism often seeks to suppress dissenting voices and limit civil liberties, which can further challenge the existing social order.
Nationalism, while not as extreme as communism or fascism, can still challenge the existing political and social order by emphasizing the importance of a particular nation or ethnic group over others. This can lead to tensions with existing political systems that are based on multiculturalism and inclusivity. Additionally, nationalism can lead to the exclusion and mistreatment of minority groups, which can further challenge the existing social order.
Overall, communism, fascism, and nationalism all present challenges to the existing political and social order in different ways. Each of these ideologies seeks to promote a different vision for society, which can lead to tensions and conflict with existing political and social structures.
Learn more about political systems here
https://brainly.com/question/30814255
#SPJ11
In a trust deed state, title to a property is vested in the __________ until the mortgage lien is satisfied.
mortgagor
grantee
grantor
trustee
Answer:
D.Trustee
Explanation:
Deed of trust. Title is vested in a third party, the trustee, until the mortgage lien is satisfied.
Explique cuál es y en que consiste el recurso habilitado para los casos de decisiones que resuelven asuntos relativos a excepciones declinatorias
In a legal context, the word "exception" is frequently used to mean an item, idea, or person that deviates from the norm or is omitted from the general proposition/condition which is laid down.
According to the decision of State of Oregon v. Moravek 297 Or. App. 763, when a defendant invokes an exception in the context of criminal law, "it constitutes an affirmative defence, which the defendant must establish to prevail in the case".
An exception is a statement that something is not included in a contract, law, or deed, such as "Landlord rents to Tenant the first floor, with the exception of the storage room."
To express disagreement with a judge's decision, a lawyer may "take exception" to the decision.
The burden of proof for exceptions rests with the accused, who must establish the facts that qualify the case for any of the common exceptions. The court will assume that none of these circumstances exist. The defence must establish the accused's guilt.
To know more about exceptions click here
https://brainly.com/question/28682308
#SPJ4
The given question in English is:
Explain what it is and what the resource enabled for cases of decisions that resolve issues related to exceptions consists of.
the supreme court over time has ruled that ap gov u3 readings 6th f18
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and plays a significant role in interpreting the Constitution and federal laws.
Over time, the Court has made landmark decisions that have shaped American society and government. These rulings, often referenced in AP Government Unit 3 readings, demonstrate the Court's power in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government and ensuring that individual rights are protected.
For example, the Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, leading to the desegregation of public schools and marking a significant milestone in the civil rights movement.
The Court's decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973 established a woman's right to seek an abortion under the constitutional right to privacy, shaping the ongoing debate on reproductive rights in the United States.
The Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010 expanded the role of corporations in political campaigns, shaping campaign finance laws and the influence of money in politics.
The Supreme Court also plays a critical role in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government. Through its decisions, the Court can limit the powers of the executive and legislative branches and ensure that they do not exceed their constitutional authority.
This role is essential for maintaining the system of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution, which aims to prevent the concentration of power and protect individual rights.
To learn more about supreme court, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11
Over time, the Supreme Court has rendered decisions in a number of cases that have profoundly influenced American politics and society. These judgements have dealt with a variety of topics, including abortion, voting rights, and civil rights. The most well-known cases include Citizens United v. FEC, Roe v. Wade, and Brown v. Board of Education. As the nation's top court, the Supreme Court's decisions are highly significant and frequently used as precedent in subsequent cases.
The Supreme Court has ruled on various cases over time that have had a significant impact on American government and society. These rulings have addressed issues such as civil rights, voting rights, abortion, and more. Some of the most notable cases include Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, and Citizens United v. FEC. As the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court's rulings carry a great deal of weight and are often cited as precedent in future cases.
learn more about supreme court here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11
some believe this rule is upheld by the wealthy to oppress the poor, a view that aligns with the ______ perspective.
some believe this rule is upheld by the wealthy to oppress the poor, a view that aligns with the Marxist perspective.
The Marxist perspective is based on the works of Karl Marx, who believed that the wealthy exploit the working class in order to maintain their power and wealth. The idea of the wealthy upholding a rule to oppress the poor is an example of this exploitation.
The wealthy are able to manipulate the rules and laws in their favor, while the poor are left behind with no voice or power. This creates an unequal society, where the working class is unable to achieve economic prosperity. The wealthy use their power to maintain their privileged status, while the poor are left to suffer in poverty.
This view aligns with the Marxist perspective, as it highlights the unequal power distribution between the wealthy and the working class in society. Ultimately, this rule is seen as a means to maintain the status quo and further the interests of the wealthy at the expense of the poor.
Know more about Marxist perspective here
https://brainly.com/question/29483756#
#SPJ11
True or False : some ecofeminists believe that the source of our environmental problems lies in the fact that we relate to nature by trying to assert dominance over it
Some ecofeminists believe that the source of our environmental problems lies in the fact that we relate to nature by trying to assert dominance over it is false.
The Chipko Andolan organization in India is one example of a campaign to protect forests founded by indigenous women that were disproportionately affected by the fast deforestation n the 1970s. Another example is Kenya's Green Belt Movement.
Ecofeminism, like the societal movements from which it arose, combines political activism and academic critique. Ecofeminism, which combines feminism and ecology, contends that patriarchy and capitalism are to blame for women's dominance and environmental destruction.
Eco-feminist, also known as eco-feminism, was founded in 1974 to promote appreciation for both women of the natural environment. The primary purpose of ecofeminism was to address and eliminate all forms of dominance while recognizing and embracing human interdependence and connection.
Learn more about ecofeminists here:
https://brainly.com/question/28466612
#SPJ4
this is a session that takes place without a jury before a judge in which evidence and/or arguments are presented to determine some factual or legal issue. A. Hearing
B. Diversion
C. Commitment
Hearing is a session that takes place without a jury before a judge in which evidence and/or arguments are presented to determine some factual or legal issue. The correct answer is A.
A hearing is a legal proceeding where evidence and arguments are presented to a judge to determine a factual or legal issue. Hearings are typically conducted in courtrooms or other official settings and may involve witnesses, testimony, and cross-examination.
Hearings can cover a variety of legal issues, such as motions to dismiss a case, bail hearings, or preliminary hearings to determine if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial. The purpose of a hearing is to allow both sides to present evidence and arguments to a judge, who will then make a decision based on the facts presented.
Unlike a trial, a hearing is typically held without a jury, and the judge is responsible for determining the outcome of the case.
To know more about legal issue, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30178117#
#SPJ11