Anselm Kiefer's artwork "Breaking of the Vessels" suggests multiple interrelated ideas about knowledge and the introduction of evil into the world. The artwork depicts a shattered vessel lying in a field, with its broken pieces scattered around it.
The broken vessel symbolizes the shattering of knowledge and the destruction of the divine vessel that contained it, as described in Jewish mysticism's Kabbalah. This destruction is attributed to the introduction of evil into the world, which is also depicted in the artwork's dark and foreboding atmosphere.
Furthermore, the artwork alludes to the historical event of the Holocaust, particularly the devastation inflicted upon the Jewish people during World War II. Anselm Kiefer, a German artist born after the war, addresses the trauma and guilt associated with his country's actions during the war.
To learn more about Anselm Kiefer follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/9876867
#SPJ4
HELPP! Why was this case important?
After the War of 1812, the U.S. government needed to borrow money to pay off war debts. At this time in history, each state had its own bank. This meant that the U.S. government had to work with multiple state banks to borrow money. To solve this problem, in 1816 Congress decided to set up the Second Bank of the United States with branches in multiple states. Many of the states opposed the national bank because it meant that their state banks had to compete with the national bank for business.
Many states were unhappy with the Second Bank of the United States. One of those states was Maryland. To show its unhappiness, Maryland passed a law that required the national bank to pay a heavy tax to the state of Maryland. This was a move to destroy the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States. James McCulloch, cashier of the Baltimore branch, had to pay a $15,000 annual tax. When McCulloch refused to pay the tax, a Maryland court convicted him and fined him $2,500. He appealed the decision to the Maryland Court of Appeals and lost again. The dispute then ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States, with Chief Justice John Marshall presiding.
Did Congress have the power to establish a national bank?
McCulloch Argument:
Congress debated the creation of the national bank a few years ago. Members of Congress believed they had the right to create the Second Bank of the United States, citing the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). The members believed that the bank was a "necessary and proper" way for Congress to conduct the financial operations of the nation. Congress referred to these as "implied powers," stating that the Constitution only provides a framework and cannot specifically outline every detail of national operations.
Maryland Argument:
The Constitution does not directly grant the power to charter a national bank. It is also not an implied power. Therefore, Congress did not have the right to establish a national bank. The states should determine the right to establish a bank.
Was the Maryland law that taxed nationally chartered banks unconstitutional, interfering with federal powers?
McCulloch Argument:
The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) states that federal law takes priority over state law. The bank is a federal function which no state may interfere. If Maryland can tax the national bank, it could interfere enough to cause the bank to close.
Maryland:
Maryland is a sovereign state; it has the right to tax individuals and businesses in its state borders.
The Judgement
The Supreme Court unanimously (7–0) ruled in favor of McCulloch and the federal government. The case was important because it established a precedent for the relationships between the federal government and the state governments. It stated that the federal government had powers the Constitution did not list, known as implied powers. These implied powers granted Congress the constitutional right to establish a national bank. They said that states had the power to tax within their borders. However, the state of Maryland did not have the power to tax a federal establishment. Maryland's decision to tax the national bank was an attempt to destroy the bank. The state challenged the supremacy of federal power.
There was an establishment of a work week and work hours, a defined working society and jobs and mass production allowed people “TIME OFF” or
There was an establishment of a work week and work hours, a defined working society and jobs and mass production allowed people “TIME OFF” or a furlough.
What does furloughing means in a company?A furlough is a required temporary leave of absence from which the employee is expected to return to work or be restored from a reduced work schedule.
Furloughs are frequently used when an employer does not have enough cash for payroll or when there is insufficient work for all employees during a slow period, and the employer can avoid terminating employees by reducing employee schedules.
Furloughed employees may be required to take a set number of unpaid hours off over a period of weeks, a set number of unpaid days or hours off throughout the year, or a single block of unpaid time off.
Full question "There was an establishment of a work week and work hours, a defined working society and jobs and mass production allowed people “TIME OFF” or _______"
Read more about Furlough
brainly.com/question/29423649
#SPJ1
which event was the primary means through which the united states became the dominant political force in middle and south america?
The event that was the primary means through which the United States became the dominant political force in Middle and South America was the Spanish-American War.
The Spanish-American War was the primary means through which the United States became the dominant political force in Middle and South America. It took place between the United States and Spain from April 25 to August 12, 1898.
It was triggered by the explosion of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor in Cuba, which was still a Spanish colony at the time. This war ended with the Treaty of Paris, which saw Spain ceding Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines to the United States.
The United States used the war as an opportunity to expand its influence in the Caribbean and Central America. They used the acquisition of Puerto Rico as a stepping stone to exert control over the Caribbean Basin, and later on, the Panama Canal.
The United States also interfered in the politics of other countries in the region, such as Nicaragua, Guatemala, and Honduras. Overall, the Spanish-American War allowed the United States to establish itself as a dominant power in the region, cementing its place as a global superpower.
To know more about Spanish-American War refer here:https://brainly.com/question/2827989#
#SPJ11
Which of the following individuals and groups most directly supported the perspective of this cartoon?
Herbert Hoover and East Coast leaders of the Republican Party.
Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters.
American men who were eligible for the military draft.
Wendell Willkie and the progressive wing of the Republican Party.
The individuals and groups most directly supported the perspective of this cartoon is charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters. The correct option is B. charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters.
This was a popular sentiment that spread throughout the country. The given cartoon was drawn in 1940 and the cartoonist's message is that the proposed peacetime draft was a conspiracy by American industry and Great Britain to trick the United States into joining World War II.
Lindbergh said that the United States had no business being involved in the war and that it should remain neutral. He went on to say that the war was being promoted by Jews and that they were using it to enrich themselves at the expense of the United States. Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters were against the draft.
They saw it as an infringement on personal liberties and thought that it would lead to more war. They were also against the idea of fighting for other countries, as they felt that the United States should focus on its own problems. Overall, Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters were against the draft, and they most directly supported the perspective of the cartoon.
For more about perspective:
https://brainly.com/question/28272722
#SPJ11
true or false: today there are more young children in child care in the united states than at any other time in history.
True. According to the United States Census Bureau, in 2018 there were 8.3 million young children in the United States receiving care in center-based and non-center-based settings, the highest number ever recorded. This is a 6% increase from the 2017 total.
In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of children in childcare in the United States, particularly as more parents have entered the workforce. According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2011, approximately 32% of children under age 5 were regularly cared for by someone other than a parent, such as a child care center or family child care provider. This represents a significant increase from previous decades.
Learn more about child care:
https://brainly.com/question/14969791
#SPJ11
President Lincoln called for volunteers to join the U.S. military in 1861 in order
to:
A. force Southern states to rejoin the Union.
B. destroy all major cities throughout the South.
C. free enslaved African Americans being held in the South.
D. protect Northern cities from Confederate attacks.
Answer I THINK ITS C
Explanation:
President Lincoln called for volunteers to join the U.S. military in 1861 in order to force Southern states to rejoin the Union. Therefore, option A is correct.
Union refers to the United States as a single nation, encompassing all the states that are part of the federal government. During the American Civil War, the Union referred to the Northern states that remained loyal to the federal government and opposed the secession of the Southern states.
President Lincoln's call for volunteers was aimed at preserving the Union, ensuring the unity and sovereignty of the United States.
The conflict between the Union and the Confederate States was a pivotal moment in American history, testing the strength and resilience of the nation as a unified entity.
Learn more about President Lincoln here:
https://brainly.com/question/25971195
#SPJ4
why was american expansion of the 1890s different from earlier expansionist moves? * 1 point it was primarily for agricultural objectives. it was intended for settlement. it was the result of war. it would create economic and military colonies overseas. it would venture into uninhabited areas.
American expansion of the 1890s was different from earlier expansionist moves because it was primarily for agricultural objectives, intended for settlement, and was the result of war.
This expansion sought to create economic and military colonies overseas and venture into uninhabited areas.
The idea of expansion for agricultural objectives stemmed from the idea of "Manifest Destiny" and was the main goal of the American expansion in the 1890s. This idea was to expand American boundaries and claim new land in order to increase the economic stability of the nation.
The idea of settlement was also important, as many Americans moved west in order to create their own settlements on the newly claimed land. The idea of war was also important, as some of the expansion in the 1890s was a result of the Mexican-American War, where the United States won new territories in the southwest.
The creation of economic and military colonies overseas was also an important part of the expansion in the 1890s, as it allowed the United States to increase its influence and power in foreign markets and regions.
Finally, the idea of venturing into uninhabited areas was important, as this allowed the United States to explore and expand its territory even further.
To know more about Manifest Destiny click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11669373#
#SPJ11
In a couple of sentences, use the graph and your knowledge of World War Il at home to compare the status of women before and after World War II.
Type your response in the box below.
Before World War II, women's participation in workforce was limited and their roles were often restricted to traditional domestic duties.
What is workforce?The workforce refers to the group of people who are available for employment and who are either currently working or seeking employment. This includes both full-time and part-time employees, as well as those who are self-employed or working on a freelance basis. The workforce is often classified into different categories, such as skilled and unskilled labor, manual and white-collar workers, and temporary and permanent employees. Workforce demographics may also be analyzed, including age, gender, ethnicity, and education level. The size and composition of the workforce can have a significant impact on the economy and businesses, as well as on social issues such as income inequality and access to employment opportunities.
To learn more about workforce, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17148967
#SPJ1
Bob has been traveling a while and is low on funds. When he reached Florence, he knows there is a famous family that runs the biggest and most respected bank in the world. As a bonus, they are huge supporters of the arts. Maybe he can get them to sponsor his architecture (or at least give him a loan
Bob could approach the famous family with an idea. He could explain to them his passion for architecture, and how he plans to make a significant contribution to the art form.
He could also explain to them his current financial situation and why he needs help. Bob could show them his portfolio of work and explain why he believes his designs are worth investing in.
He could also offer to use the money to help promote their bank in exchange for the loan, or a sponsorship. By working together, they could both benefit from the arrangement. Bob could use the money to continue his work and the bank could get more exposure.
To know more about Bank, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14042269
#SPJ4
State level governments are based on the organization of:
The Federalist Papers
The Declaration of Independence
the national government outlined in the Constitution
O monarchies in Europe
ext incorrect question
BRE
State level governments are based on the organization of C . the national government outlined in the Constitution .
How are state level governments organized in the United States ?The Constitution outlines the powers and responsibilities of both the federal government and the state governments, and establishes a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful.
State level governments have their own constitutions, which outline the structure and powers of their respective state governments within the framework of the federal system .
Find out more on state level governments at https://brainly.com/question/25192887
#SPJ1
do you think world war 1 was avoidable why or why not
You would have to go back pretty far to avoid World War l. Stopping the assassination of Ferdinand simply delays it. Let's look at the geopolitical situation.
France is spoiling for a fight; they want revenge for their humiliating defeat and to take back Alsace and Lorraine. After 1871, a second French/German war is only a matter of time.Russia is trying to protest its smaller Slavic brother in the Balkans against Austria. Austria is trying to protect itself from internal unrest in its Slavic provinces. Serbia is trying to exist, while playing Russian roulette (pun intended) with half-hearted attempts at freeing other Austrian-ruled Slavs. So from about 1878 onwards, avoiding war between Austria/Russia is a delicate dance. Neither wants war, but their goals are completely at odds. Germany is facing three simultaneous issues.- It knows that a war with France is inevitable and, as of the 1891 alliance between France and Russia, war with Russia is therefore inevitable as well. German military planners believe that beyond 1920, Russia will have industrialized to the point where there is no way Germany could win. Hindsight leads us to believe they were largely correct. Hence, Germany needs that war with Franc and Russia to happen before 1920 if it has any hope of winning.
- Austria is collapsing, thanks in no small part to Slavic "mischief". Austria-Hungary shares a massive land border with Germany and, should it collapse, will cause Germany to be surrounded on most dies by unfriendly/hostile neighbors.
- As a major industrial nation (beyond France and rivaling Britain/USA at this point) it needs foreign trade. But because of their navies and massive colonial empires, France and especially Britain have a huge chokehold on that trade. Germany often gets the short end of the stick.
Britain has two very specific goals that is sees as essential for its survival:- There must always be at least two equal and opposing factions on the European continent. If Europe is fighting itself, it can't invade the British Empire. Britain can not compete with France or Germany should either become dominant on the continent.
- The British Navy must be at least as big as the next two competing navies combined. In this period, that's some combination of France, the USA, and Germany.
So look at all those conflicting needs and ask yourself how you avoid a war.
TLDR
Stopping the killing of Archduke Ferdinand simply delays the war and probably not that much
You can keep Italy out of the war, and maybe Britain. Just keep Germany from invading Belgium and convince the British that whoever wins the war, everyone fighting it will be hammered As long as everyone gets knocked down, the British are fine.
You won't stop a war between France and Germany. You'd have to stop the France-Prussian War for that and the only way that happens is Germany not unifying.
Russia doesn't want war, but if France gets curb-stomped by Germany, it has no friends left. You won't keep Russia out of the war.
a key advocate of feminist policies in the 1970s was question 1 options: phyllis schlafly richard nixon gloria steinem eleanor roosevelt all of the above none of the above
Gloria Steinem was a key advocate of feminist policies in the 1970s.
She was a feminist activist and journalist who co-founded Ms. Magazine in 1972. She was one of the most visible faces of the women's liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s.
Steinam was a prominent feminist leader who founded the National Women's Political Caucus, served as president of the feminist organization Voters for Choice, and established the Ms. Foundation for Women, which provides grants to women's groups throughout the country.
Therefore the key advocate of feminist policies is "gloria steinem."
To know more about Gloria Steinem click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16578908
#SPJ11
what nationality was the first scientist who used the pi symbol?
Leonhard Euler was the first mathematician, physicist, and astronomer in 1737 who adopted the pi symbol ( [tex]\pi[/tex] ). He was born in Basel, Switzerland on 15 April 1707. He studied with diligence and showed an affinity for cognitive thinking and higher senses of logical reasoning.
He was bright in the field of mathematics and engineering hence he enrolled in the University of Basel, in 1720. Furthermore, his drive and curiosity to learn led to many epitomes of success such as his model for topology while viewing a map changed the common views of people across the globe.
Hence, Leonhard Euler opened the gates to the future of cognitive thinking and formed the stepping stone for future generation.
To learn more about Leonhard Euler,
https://brainly.com/question/30883806
Can someone help me given Brainly
Your best fit is…
(Committed. Conservatives)
…. Along with 7% the public
Committed Conservatives
Staunchly conservative and overwhelmingly Republican, Committed Conservatives hold pro-business views traditionally associated with the Republican Party, have favorable attitudes about international trade and favor limited government. Their approach to international relations centers on engaging with U.S. Allie’s and maintaining American military might. Committed Conservatives tend to hold more moderate positions on immigration than Faith and Family Conservatives and Populist Right. They also are slightly more moderate than these groups on some issues related to racial and ethnic equality. While they largely supported Donald Trump in 2020, they are less likely than Faith and Family Conservatives and Populist Right to favor a major role for Trump in their party’s future.
Does this change your opinion about political views why or why not?
Do you Agree or Disagree of Committed Conservatives why or why not?
Compared to the Populist Right and Faith & Flag Conservatives, two other extremely conservative groups with in Republican coalition.
How well-versed are you in conservatism?Dedicated Conservatives typically have more liberal attitudes towards immigration.
They are also slightly more moderate than all of these groups on some issues relating to racial and ethnic equality, although they are still more conservative than the groups with a Democratic lean. Conservatives backed lasting traditional and cultural values. They were the defenders of the aristocracy and nobility. They believed that there ought to be privileges for the king and the nobility. They argued that after the French Revolution, society should go through gradual reform.
To know more about Conservatives visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28318194
#SPJ1
Madagascar plan was ultimately abandoned by the Nazi party when it became apparent that Britain would not easily be conquered. how was the plan triumphed over Britain related to resettling Jews on an island off the coast of Africa?
A) the Britain where allies of the malagasy people and promised fight against resettlement.
B) Brian had colonized madagascar, so Germany hoped to take control of it.
C) the Nazis plan to use British warships to transport Jewish prisoners.
D) if Britain were conquered, the United States would be too powerless to object the Madagascar plan
Option (c), The Nazis intend to transport Jewish detainees using British warships.
The Madagascar Plan was what?The Nazi German government suggested the "Madagascar Plan," which advocated for expelling Jews from Europe and forced them to relocate on the island of Madagascar. In June 1940, just before France was toppled, Franz Rademacher, the head of the German Foreign Office's Jewish Division, put up the notion. The plan proposed giving Germany dominion over Madagascar, which at the time was a French colony, in exchange for final peace conditions.
The possibility of resettling Polish Jews in Madagascar was investigated by the Polish government in 1937, but the task team that was sent to evaluate the potential of the island discovered that only 5,000 to 7,000 households, or possibly as few as 500 families, according to some estimates, could be accommodated.
Due to the Nazis' unsuccessful attempts to encourage the emigration of Germany's Jewish population before to World War Two, the idea of sending Jews to Madagascar was revived by the Nazi leadership in 1940.
The Madagascar Plan, a Nazi German plot that called for moving European Jews to the island of Madagascar, was conceived during World War II. This was meant to occur following the invasion of Madagascar, which was then a part of France.
The plan was never put into action for two main reasons. The strategy needed Germany to be able to control Great Britain's naval forces, but this never happened. The scheme was also replaced with the "Final Solution," which called for the extermination of all Jews in Europe.
Learn more about "Madagascar Plan,": https://brainly.com/question/3067634
#SPJ1
________used_______, a horribly addictive drug to create favorable trade for themselves in China unfortunately it ruined the weaker nation's ______
The British Empire used opium, a horribly addictive drug, to create favorable trade for themselves in China.
What impact does it had on the society ?Unfortunately, it ruined the weaker nation's economy and society. In the 19th century, Britain was exporting large quantities of opium to China, causing widespread addiction and social problems. The Chinese government tried to ban the drug, but the British refused to stop trading. This led to the Opium Wars, where the British military defeated China and forced them to sign unfavorable treaties, including the ceding of Hong Kong to Britain. This example highlights the unethical and exploitative practices of imperial powers, as well as the devastating consequences of addiction on individuals and society.
To know more about Opium Wars, visit :
brainly.com/question/15072997
#SPJ1
who was the controversial french ambassador to the united states who openly recruited american volunteers to commit acts of war against england and spain?
The French ambassador to the United States who openly recruited American volunteers to commit acts of war against England and Spain was Pierre Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais.
He was a French playwright, watchmaker, entrepreneur, spy, and diplomat. He served as the French ambassador to the United States from 1777 to 1780 and worked to enlist volunteers in the American Revolution. Beaumarchais was a controversial figure as his efforts to recruit volunteers often involved smuggling weapons and munitions into the United States.
He was also accused of using the volunteers he recruited to carry out acts of piracy against English and Spanish ships. He faced several accusations and legal challenges throughout his mission, but he was ultimately exonerated of any wrongdoing.
Beaumarchais was an important figure in the American Revolution, as he helped to secure support for the rebel cause and recruit volunteers who were essential in helping to win the war. He was a controversial figure, but his efforts to recruit volunteers for the American Revolution and his willingness to take risks for the cause of freedom and democracy were invaluable to the success of the Revolutionary War.
To know more Beaumarchais French playwright about refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/30713308
#SPJ11
what italian word is the name of a sort of outdoor pulpit, one of which can be found in the city of brescia?
The Italian word for the sort of outdoor pulpit you are referring to is "ambone". In Brescia, there is a famous outdoor ambone located in the Piazza del Duomo.
An ambone is a type of outdoor pulpit that was commonly used in early Christian churches for preaching and public speaking. The word "ambone" comes from the Greek word "ambon," which means "step" or "elevated platform." Ambones were often made of stone or wood and were situated in a prominent location in the church or public square. The Brescia ambone is a particularly fine example of this type of architecture, with its detailed carvings and intricate decorations. The ambone played an important role in the early Christian church as a place for delivering sermons and other important messages to the congregation. Today, ambones are still used in some religious ceremonies and celebrations, particularly in Italy and other parts of Europe.
learn more about Greek here
https://brainly.com/question/232317
#SPJ1
explain how scotus used interstate commerce to uphold the constitutionality of the civil rights act of 1964 (federal statutes outlawing segregation in public accommodations) ...
The Supreme Court used the power granted to Congress to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to uphold the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
This power enabled Congress to make laws that regulate economic activity, including the segregation of public accommodations, which had a direct effect on interstate commerce.
1. The Supreme Court used the Commerce Clause in the Constitution to uphold the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
2. The Commerce Clause gives Congress the power to regulate economic activity that affects interstate commerce.
3. The segregation of public accommodations, such as restaurants, was found to have a direct effect on interstate commerce.
4. Therefore, Congress was granted the power to outlaw the segregation of public accommodations, which it did through the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
To know more about Civil Rights Act of 1964 refer to-
brainly.com/question/1264052#
#SPJ11
what was not a reason that the industrial revolution began in england? responses many available laborers many available laborers strong banking system strong banking system large population of landowners large population of landowners numerous rivers
None of the options provided is a valid response as they all were contributing factors to the Industrial Revolution in England.
The Industrial Revolution in England was a complex and multifaceted event that was caused by a combination of economic, social, and technological factors. The availability of many laborers, a strong banking system, a large population of landowners, and numerous rivers were all key factors that contributed to the growth of the industry in England. Other factors that also played a role in the Industrial Revolution include technological innovations, the availability of natural resources, and the growth of trade and commerce.
For more information on The Industrial Revolution in England:
https://brainly.com/question/14528824?referrer=searchResults
page(s) 264-265 7.2. what major disagreements and compromises molded the final content of the constitution? identify the ways slavery was addressed in the constitution
The major disagreements and compromises that molded the final content of the Constitution were mainly around representation and slavery. Slavery was addressed directly in the Constitution in the form of the Three-Fifths Compromise.
The Great Compromise of 1787 resolved the representation dispute by creating a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives based on population and a Senate with two members from each state. The Three-Fifths Compromise determined that three-fifths of the population of slaves would be counted for the purposes of taxation and representation of slavery.
This also indirectly contributed to the power of the Southern states. Lastly, the Slave Trade Compromise prohibited Congress from regulating slavery for twenty years and prohibited them from outlawing it until 1808.
Slavery was addressed directly in the Constitution in the form of the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted slaves as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes, and indirectly through the Slave Trade Compromise. This allowed the continuation of slavery for twenty years and made it illegal after that. The Constitution also included the Fugitive Slave Clause, which obligated states to return runaway slaves to their owners.
Know more about slavery here:
https://brainly.com/question/17572433
#SPJ11
1. How has geography affected Japan? Provide
specific examples of an event that may cause
multiple reactions throughout a country (e.g.,
geographical, economical, and/or social
implications).
The example of geography affecting Japan is that the terrain is mountainous. This means there is not a lot of good land for farming.
Because of the geography, the Japanese relied on the sea for many aspects of daily life. Trade with China and Korea became important to get the resources they needed.
Japan most known for?Japan is for a wide range of things, that has onsen hot springs and kabuki baths, which date back to the sixth and sixteenth centuries, respectively, as well as all-night neon-lit dance parties, anime, and sushi boat restaurants, all of which are certainly more contemporary.
How old is Japan?Japan has been inhabited since the Upper Paleolithic (30,000 BC), but the first documented reference of the archipelago is there in a Chinese chronicle (the Book of Han), which was done in the second century AD.
To know more about Japan visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19171040
#SPJ1
the third intermediate period in egypt was part of what larger mediterranean and near eastern phenomen? question 1 options:
The third intermediate period in Egypt was part of the larger Near Eastern Late Bronze Age (ca. 1550–1175 BCE).
This period saw the emergence of powerful regional states and empires throughout the Near East, including the Neo-Assyrian Empire and the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
1. The third intermediate period in Egypt was part of the larger Near Eastern Late Bronze Age.
2. This period was in the timeframe of 1550–1175 BCE.
3. During this period, powerful regional states and empires emerged in the Near East, such as the Neo-Assyrian Empire and the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
To know more about Egypt refer to-
brainly.com/question/9626101#
#SPJ11
Complete question
The third intermediate period in egypt was part of what larger mediterranean and near eastern phenomen?
how could spaniards obtain encomiendas?group of answer choicesby inheriting themby buying them from native chiefsby serving the spanish crownby buying them from other spaniards
Encomiendas were a type of labor and tribute system in the Spanish colonies. The Spaniards could obtain encomiendas by serving the Spanish Crown. The correct option is C.
Spaniards could obtain encomienda by serving the Spanish Crown.
Encomienda was a system of rewarding conquistadors with land grants and the labor of the conquered peoples. In exchange, the encomenderos, or recipients of the encomienda, were responsible for the well-being and religious instruction of the natives under their control.
The Spanish monarchy was responsible for granting encomiendas to conquistadors who assisted in the colonization and subjugation of new territories, as well as for managing the encomienda system in the colonies. To gain encomiendas, individuals had to serve the Spanish crown, either through military service or other means.
The Spanish crown would then reward these individuals with encomiendas, giving them the authority to collect tributes and labor from the natives of the area. The idea of buying or inheriting encomiendas was unlikely since they were granted by the Spanish crown and were based on loyalty and service to the crown rather than personal wealth or inheritance.
Thus, the correct answer is C. Spaniards could obtain encomiendas by serving the Spanish Crown.
To know more about Encomiendas here:
https://brainly.com/question/11873464#
#SPJ11
what do etruscan tombs tell us about the etruscan's' lives? be sure to cite specific examples to illustrate your discussion. how does it demonstrate contact with other cultures?
Etruscan tombs tell us about Etruscan art and crafts, their wealth, religion, society, and their everyday life. The tombs offer much insight into the Etruscan people’s rituals, society, and everyday life, including their religious beliefs and their perspective on death.
The decorations on the walls and ceilings of the tombs show several scenes and figures from the Etruscan lifestyle that represented how the Etruscan people lived. The Etruscan tombs’ walls and ceilings are decorated with images of humans, animals, and mythical creatures.
The Etruscan people believed in the afterlife, and, to this end, they preserved the dead in decorated tombs along with their most valuable belongings. These tombs were sealed after the burial, so that the items inside the tomb could never be taken out. It was believed that the deceased could utilize their possessions and continue their life in the afterlife.
The Etruscans had long-established trade routes with Greece and other nations in the Mediterranean area, as revealed by the objects found in the tombs. These objects were likely acquired through trade or given as gifts to Etruscan aristocrats.
Know more about Etruscan here:
https://brainly.com/question/28232442
#SPJ11
over the course of the nineteenth century, differences in what things were evidence of divisions in the united states? luoa
In the nineteenth century, differences in economics, politics, and culture were evidence of divisions in the United States. For example, many regions of the country had very different economic conditions and political ideologies, while also exhibiting distinct cultural norms and customs. Additionally, racial divisions were very prominent in the nineteenth century, with African Americans facing various forms of discrimination in much of the country.
The 19th century is a period in history that occurred between 1801 and 1900, as well as the last century of the modern period. The 19th century was a century of innovation and revolution, with new political and social ideologies and industrial technology giving rise to capitalism, communism, and the creation of factories.
The United States was no exception, and throughout the century, there were several divisions that resulted from disagreements on issues such as slavery, sectionalism, politics, and economics. The divisions in the United States over the course of the nineteenth century were evidenced by:
1. Slavery: Slavery was one of the most divisive topics in America in the 19th century, leading to the Civil War. Abolitionists advocated for the abolition of slavery, while others were in favor of it.
2. Sectionalism: Sectionalism refers to the political, social, and economic differences between the North and South. The South was agricultural and supported slavery, while the North was industrial and opposed it.
3. Politics: Politics was a major point of division in the 19th century. Political divisions were seen between the two major parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, as well as the Republican party, which was formed in 1854.
4. Economics: Economic differences also led to divisions in America. The North's economy was based on manufacturing, while the South's economy was based on agriculture. In conclusion, over the course of the nineteenth century, differences in slavery, sectionalism, politics, and economics were evidence of divisions in the United States.
To know more about nineteenth century, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30048262#
#SPJ11
I’ll put the pictures in can y’all do the paragraph ?
Answer: Here's a CER paragraph with 4 claims about Andrew Jackson as a villain, with supporting evidence and explanations:
Andrew Jackson is often seen as a villain in American history due to his controversial policies and actions. Firstly, his treatment of Native Americans is a clear indication of his villainous nature. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which forcibly relocated tens of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, resulting in the infamous Trail of Tears. This caused immense suffering and loss of life for Native American communities, as documented by the National Park Service.
Secondly, Jackson's disregard for the Constitution is another indication of his villainous nature. He vetoed the re-chartering of the Second Bank of the United States in 1832, despite the fact that it was a lawful institution established by Congress. This act of executive overreach undermined the separation of powers, according to the National Constitution Center, and set a dangerous precedent for future presidents.
Thirdly, Jackson's expansion of executive power is another clear indication of his villainous nature. He famously declared, "I am the government," according to the Miller Center, and made it clear that he would use his presidential powers to push through his agenda. This disregard for checks and balances contributed to a concentration of power in the executive branch that many see as undemocratic.
Finally, Jackson's violent temperament and tendency to engage in duels are also evidence of his villainous nature. According to History.com, he engaged in several duels throughout his life, including one in which he killed a man. This shows a willingness to use violence to settle disputes, which is certainly not a trait of a hero.
In conclusion, Jackson's treatment of Native Americans, disregard for the Constitution, expansion of executive power, and violent tendencies are all clear indications of his villainous nature. While he is celebrated by some for his military leadership and populist rhetoric, a closer examination of his actions reveals a darker side to his legacy.
Explanation:
Why did the Sons of Liberty dress up as Native Americans and dump tea in the Boston Harbor?
Answer:
The Sons of Liberty dressed up as Native Americans and dumped tea in the Boston Harbor as a protest against the Tea Act of 1773. The Tea Act was a law passed by the British government that imposed a tax on tea imported to the American colonies. The Sons of Liberty viewed the Tea Act as an unjust taxation without representation and a violation of their rights as British citizens. The Boston Tea Party was a symbolic act of defiance against the British government and a rallying cry for the American Revolution.
Which list includes events that all occurred during Reconstruction?A• Annexation of California• Signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe• HidalgoB • American occupation of Mexico City• Establishment of the Freedmen's Bureau• Impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson• Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment.C.• Battle of Gettysburg• Assassination of Abraham Lincoln• Bombardment of Fort SumterD .• Enforcement of the Tariff of Abominations• Passage of the Missouri Compromise• Raid at Harpers Ferry
The events that all occurred during Reconstruction are: American occupation of Mexico City• Establishment of the Freedmen's Bureau• Impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson• Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. So, option B is correct.
The formation of the Freedmen's Bureau, Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial, and the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment all took place in the United States during the Reconstruction era. The Mexican-American War, which took place before Reconstruction, saw the American conquest of Mexico City. There were further events connected to the Mexican-American War, such as the annexation of California and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Before Reconstruction, there was the Civil War, which included the Battle of Gettysburg and Lincoln's assassination. The Missouri Compromise's adoption, the Harpers Ferry Raid, and the Tariff of Abominations' enforcement all took place before the Civil War.
To know more about Reconstruction era
brainly.com/question/14423201
#SPJ4
The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution led to what feature of English government that was distinct from other European nations at the time?
Absolutism
Constitutional monarchy
Protestant leadership
State religion
The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy in England, which was a feature of English government that was distinct from other European nations at the time. A constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a monarch serves as head of state within the parameters of a constitution, which limits the powers of the monarch and establishes the rights of the people. The English Bill of Rights, which was enacted after the Glorious Revolution in 1689, established limits on the power of the monarch and established the rights of English citizens. This laid the foundation for a system of government that was based on the rule of law and the rights of the people, rather than the absolute power of the monarch. This was a departure from the system of absolute monarchy that existed in many other European nations at the time, and it helped to establish England as a leader in democratic governance.
Answer: Constitutional monarchy
Explanation: