Bro leave me alone pls

Answer:

a) Comparing: Comparing means evaluating the similarity or difference between two or more objects, values, or variables. It is a process of identifying and highlighting the similarities and differences among objects, values, or variables based on specific criteria.

b) Non-standard units of measurement: Non-standard units of measurement are those that are not part of the International System of Units (SI) and are often created for specific purposes or contexts. These units may be used to measure variables such as time, distance, weight, or volume, but they are not universally recognized or standardized.

c) Standardized units of measurement: Standardized units of measurement are those that are part of the International System of Units (SI) and are universally recognized and accepted. These units provide a standard framework for measuring variables such as time, distance, weight, or volume, making it possible to compare and communicate measurements accurately across different contexts and languages. Some examples of standardized units of measurement include seconds, meters, kilograms, and liters.

The angle indicated by a green arc is 54 degrees.

A straight line's angle size is 180°; the sum of the angles in a triangle's size is 180°; and a triangle can also have acute as well as obtuse angles.

The fact that the sum of the angles in a triangle equals 180 degrees can be used to determine the value of the angle in the given figure.

To begin, note that the angle denoted by a blue arc is the exterior angle of triangle ACD. According to the Exterior Angle Theorem, this angle is equal to the sum of the two remote interior angles, denoted by red and green arcs.

So we have:

The blue arc angle is equal to the sum of the red and green arc angles.

We get the following equation when we plug in the given angle measurements:

98° = 44° + Green arc angle

We can simplify this equation as follows:

Green arc angle = 98° - 44° = 54°

The green arc represents an interior angle of triangle ABD. As a result, we can use the fact that the sum of a triangle's angles equals 180 degrees to calculate the value of this angle.

We currently have:

Green arc angle + 70° + 56° = 180°

We get the following by substituting the value we found for the green arc angle:

54° + 70° + 56° = 180°

We can simplify this equation as follows:

180° - 70° - 56° = 54°

As a result, the angle indicated by a green arc has the value:

It is 54 degrees outside.

To know more about Angle Value visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30937335

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

The measure of angle p is 60°

Answer:

If 18% of victims of financial fraud know the perpetrator of the fraud personally, and a sample of 156 people were victims of fraud, we can find the mean number of those victims that know the perpetrator by multiplying the sample size by the percentage. Therefore, the mean number of victims that know the perpetrator is 156 x 0.18 = 28.08. However, since we cannot have a fraction of a person, we can round the answer to the nearest whole number. Therefore, the mean number of victims that know the perpetrator is 28.

With the help of proportions in the given similar triangles we know that the value of x is 3.5 units.

Euclidean geometry states that two objects are comparable if they have the same shape or the same shape as each other's mirror image.

One can be created from the other more precisely by evenly scaling, possibly with the inclusion of further translation, rotation, and reflection.

These three theorems—Angle-Angle (AA), Side-Angle-Side (SAS), and Side-Side-Side (SSS)—are reliable techniques for figuring out how similar triangles are to one another.

So, in the given situation:

TR and WY are as follows:
TR/WU

24/2

2/1

Similarly,

TS/WV

2/1

7/x

7/3.5

Therefore, with the help of proportions in the given similar triangles we know that the value of x is 3.5 units.

Know more about triangle similarity here:

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

Therefore, it will take approximately 13.47 years for $2000.00 to double at an annual rate of 5.25% compounded monthly.

Percent is a way of expressing a number as a fraction of 100. The symbol for percent is "%". Percentages are used in many different contexts, such as finance, economics, statistics, and everyday life. Percentages can also be used to express change or growth, such as an increase or decrease in the value of something over time.

Here,

The formula for the accumulated amount (A) when interest is compounded n times per year at an annual interest rate of r, for t years, is:

[tex]A = P(1 +\frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

where P is the principal amount (initial investment).

To find approximately how long it will take $2000.00 to double at an annual rate of 5.25% compounded monthly, we need to solve for t in the above formula.

Let P = $2000.00, r = 0.0525 (5.25% expressed as a decimal), and n = 12 (monthly compounding).

Then, we have:

[tex]2P = P(1 +\frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

Dividing both sides by P, we get:

[tex]2= (1 +\frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

[tex]ln(2) =ln(1 +\frac{r}{n})^{nt}[/tex]

Using the properties of logarithms, we can simplify this expression as:

[tex]ln(2) = n*t * ln(1 + r/n)[/tex]

Dividing both sides by n*ln(1 + r/n), we get:

[tex]t = ln(2) / (n * ln(1 + r/n))[/tex]

Plugging in the values for r and n, we get:

[tex]t = ln(2) / (12 * ln(1 + 0.0525/12))[/tex]

Solving this expression on a calculator, we get:

t ≈ 13.47 years

To know more about percent,

https://brainly.com/question/29172752

#SPJ1

Answer: $194.79

Step-by-step explanation:

It is easiest to approach this question in two parts.

First part is simple - multiply the wage per hour times the number of whole number you have worked. ($12.50)(15) = $187.50

Next you need to find how much you make in 35 minutes at a wage rate of 12.50 an hour. You can set up a ratio to find this out -

($12.50) | (60 min)  -    (x dollars) | (35 min)

then cross multiply and divide -  (12.5 * 35) / 60 = 7.291

This means you make $7.29 for 35 minutes of work.

$187.50 + $7.29 = $194.79 for 15 hours 35 minutes of work.

(this is based on a per minute/hour scale)

Answer: Physical weathering, more specifically, ice wedging

Step-by-step explanation:

:D

By rewritting the exponential equation, we can see that the correct options are B and C.

We know that the balance is modeled by the exponential equation below:

[tex]A = 328.23\times e^{0.045*(t - 2)}[/tex]

Now we want to see which of the other equations are equivalent to this one, so we need to rewrite this equation, so let's do that.

First we can rewrite the second part to get:

[tex]A = 328.23\times e^{0.045\times(t - 2)}\\\\A = 328.23\times(e^{-2*0.045*}\times e^{0.045\times t})\\\\A = 300\times e^{0.045\times t}[/tex]

So that is an equivalent equation.

We also can keep rewritting this to get:

[tex]A = 300\times e^{0.045\times t}\\\\A = 300\times(e^{0.045})^t\\\\A = 300\times(1.046)^t[/tex]

The correct options are B and C.

Learn more about exponential equation at:

https://brainly.com/question/11832081

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this problem, we need to calculate the present value of the cash flows in both cases - the case where the payments are made at the beginning of each year and the case where the payments are made at the end of each year - and compare the two values.

First, let's calculate the present value of the cash flows when payments are made at the end of each year. We can use the formula for the present value of an ordinary annuity:

PV = PMT x [(1 - (1 / (1 + r)n)) / r]

where PV is the present value, PMT is the payment amount, r is the discount rate, and n is the number of periods.

In this case, PMT = R15 000, r = 9%, and n = 13. Plugging in these values, we get:

PV = R15 000 x [(1 - (1 / (1 + 0.09)^13)) / 0.09] = R141,798.06

Now let's calculate the present value of the cash flows when payments are made at the beginning of each year. To do this, we can use the formula for the present value of an annuity due:

PV = PMT x [(1 - (1 / (1 + r)n)) / r] x (1 + r)

where PV is the present value, PMT is the payment amount, r is the discount rate, n is the number of periods, and (1 + r) adjusts the formula for the fact that payments are being made at the beginning of each year.

In this case, PMT = R15 000, r = 9%, and n = 13. Plugging in these values, we get:

PV = R15 000 x [(1 - (1 / (1 + 0.09)^13)) / 0.09] x (1 + 0.09) = R153,094.97

So the present value of the cash flows when payments are made at the beginning of each year is R153,094.97, and the present value of the cash flows when payments are made at the end of each year is R141,798.06. Therefore, the difference in present value is:

R153,094.97 - R141,798.06 = R11,296.91

So, receiving the payments at the beginning rather than at the end of each year would result in a present value that is R11,296.91 higher.

Rolling a number higher than 3 has a 2/6 or 1/3 chance of happening. Another way to say this is to round a decimal to the closest millionth, which is  [tex]0.333333[/tex]  .

A standard die has 6 sides, labelled with the numbers 1 through 6. When the die is rolled, each side has an equal probability of landing face up.

Since we want to find the probability of rolling a number greater than 3, we need to determine the number of outcomes that satisfy this condition and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes.

When you roll a standard die, there are six equally likely outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Since we want to find the probability of rolling a number greater than 3, we need to count how many of these outcomes satisfy that condition.

Therefore, the probability of rolling a number greater than 3 is 2/6 or 1/3. Alternatively, we could express this as a decimal rounded to the nearest millionth, which would be  [tex]0.333333[/tex] .

Learn more about fraction here:

https://brainly.com/question/29156749

#SPJ1

Answer:

7/20

its the answer to your question

After solving the equations e know that Planet II is 35 million miles away from the sun.

The equals sign is a symbol used in mathematical formulas to denote the equality of two expressions.

An equation is a mathematical statement that contains the symbol "equal to" between two expressions with identical values.

As in 3x + 5 = 15, for example.

There are many different types of equations, including linear, quadratic, cubic, and others.

The three primary forms of linear equations are point-slope, standard, and slope-intercept.

So, let x be the separation between planet I and the sun.

Planet II's distance from the sun is x-30.2.

Planet iii's distance from the sun is equal to x+24.8.

x + x-30.2 + x+24.8 = 190.2

Mix related phrases to find x.

3x - 5.4 = 190.2

3x = 195.6

x = 65.2

65.2 million miles separate planet I from the sun.

Planet II is 35 million miles from the sun or 65.2-30.2.

Planet iii is 90 million miles from the sun (65.2 + 24.8 = miles).

Therefore, after solving the equations e know that Planet II is 35 million miles away from the sun.

Know more about equations here:

brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

AFE triangle,

FE= 6cos60

    = 3

dc= 3

ae= 6sin60

   = 3*squareroot3

Area= 1/2(10+4)*3*squareroot3

       = 7*3*squareroot3

        = 21*squareroot3

        = 21*1.73

         = 36.33square units

Answer:

The formula for the circumference of a circle is C = 2πr, where r is the radius of the circle and π (pi) is a mathematical constant approximately equal to 3.14.

Substituting the given value of r=11 m and using π = 3.14, we get:

C = 2πr

C = 2 x 3.14 x 11 m

C = 69.08 m

Therefore, the circumference of the circle is 69.08 meters

As we are looking for the distance to the nearest whole number, we can round this answer to 517 feet. This means that when the plane has reached an altitude of 300 feet, it has flown a distance of 517 feet.

To find the distance that the plane has flown when it has reached an altitude of 300 feet, we can use the formula d = x * tan(a) where d is the distance, x is the altitude, and a is the angle. We are given the altitude of 300 feet and the angle of 15°. Plugging those values into the formula, we get d = 300 * tan(15°) = 517.4 feet. Rounding this to the nearest whole number, we get 517 feet.

To find the distance that the plane has flown when it has reached an altitude of 300 feet, we can use the formula d = x * tan(a). This equation is derived from the Pythagorean Theorem, where d is the distance, x is the altitude, and a is the angle. We are given the altitude of 300 feet and the angle of 15°, so we can plug these values into the equation. When we do this, we get d = 300 * tan(15°) = 517.4 feet. As we are looking for the distance to the nearest whole number, we can round this answer to 517 feet. This means that when the plane has reached an altitude of 300 feet, it has flown a distance of 517 feet.

Learn more about distance here

https://brainly.com/question/28956738

#SPJ1

The distance the plane traveled from point A to point B is approximately 8.15 miles or 43056 feet (rounded to the nearest tenth of a foot).

An angle is a geometric figure formed by two rays, called the sides of the angle, that share a common endpoint, called the vertex of the angle. Angles are typically measured in degrees or radians, and they are used to describe the amount of rotation or turning between two lines or planes. In a two-dimensional plane, angles are usually measured as the amount of rotation required to move one line or plane to coincide with the other line or plane.

Let's first draw a diagram to visualize the problem:

                    /  |

                  /     |

                 /       |P (plane)

                /        |

               /         |

              /          | h = 6900 ft

            /            

           / θ2.        |  

         /                |

       /                  |

   B ___/θ1__  _|___ A

           d

We need to find the distance the plane traveled from point A to point B, which we'll call d. We can use trigonometry to solve for d.

From point A, we have an angle of elevation of 16° to the plane. This means that the angle between the horizontal and the line from point A to the plane is 90° - 16° = 74°. Similarly, from point B, we have an angle of elevation of 27° to the plane, so the angle between the horizontal and the line from point B to the plane is 90° - 27° = 63°.

Let's use the tangent function to solve for d:

x = h / tan(74°) = 19906.5 ft

d - x = h / tan(63°) = 23205.2 ft

So,

d = x + h / tan(63°) ≈ 43111.7 ft ≈ 8.15 miles.

Therefore, the distance the plane travelled from point A to point B is approximately 8.15 miles or 43056 feet (rounded to the nearest tenth of a foot).

To know more about Angles visit:-

brainly.com/question/25770607

#SPJ1

The option that describes the null and alternative hypothesis, test statistic and conclusion will be B. test statistic = -1.5625 and the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis.

In statistical hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is a statement that assumes no significant difference or relationship between two or more variables. It represents the default position that there is no effect or change, or that any observed effect is due to chance.

The alternative hypothesis (H1), on the other hand, represents the opposite of the null hypothesis. It states that there is a significant difference or relationship between the variables being tested. The alternative hypothesis is typically what the researcher is trying to prove or support with their study.

The test statistic will be:

= (116 - 121) / 16(✓1/50 + 1/50)

= -1.5625

Learn more about hypothesis on;

https://brainly.com/question/25263462

#SPJ1

The five in 35.76 is 100 times bigger than the five in 26.95.

Here we want to compare the values of the 5's in two different numbers, which are 35.76 and 26.95.

To compare them we need to compare the place value in which each five is.

To compare them, just write the numbers but replacing all the other values by zeros:

35.76 = 05.00 = 5

26.95 = 00.05 = 0.05

Now take the quotient of these two, we will get:

5/0.05 = 100

Thus, the 5 in 35.76 is 100 times bigger than the 5 in 26.95.

Learn more about place values at:

https://brainly.com/question/25137147

#SPJ1

The provided remark indicates that option (A) is accurate for 2.5 inches.

The measurement or size of something to end to end is referred to as its length. To put it another way, it is the bigger of the upper two or three dimensions of a geometric form or object. For instance, the length and width of a parallelogram define its measurements.

Using the given equation:

Arc Length / 20π = 45/360

Cross multiply:

Arc length × 360 = 20π x 45

Arc length x 360 = 900π

Divide both sides by 360:

Arc length = 900π / 360

Arc Length = 2.5 π inches.

To know more about Length visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28322552

#SPJ1

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct coordinates of the center of dilation are (2.8, 3.8).

What is dilation?

In geometry, dilation is a transformation that changes the size of an object. When a figure is dilated, each point of the original figure is moved away from or toward the center of dilation.

Dylan's claim is incorrect because the center of dilation is not necessarily located on the line segment PP'.

To find the center of dilation, we need to locate the image point of a known point after dilation.

Let's consider a point Q on the same line as PP', but on the other side of P', such that PQ = 1 unit. After dilation with a scale factor of 4, the image of Q will be on the line passing through P and P'. Let's denote this image point by Q'.

Since PQ : P'Q' = 1 : 4, the distance from P to Q' is 4 units. Similarly, since PP' : PQ' = 1 : 5, the distance from P to Q' is 5 times the distance from P to P'. Thus, the distance from P to P' is 1 unit and the distance from P to Q' is 5 units.

Therefore, the center of dilation is located on the line passing through P and Q', and is 4 units away from P and 1 unit away from Q'.

Using the midpoint formula, we can find the coordinates of the center of dilation:

[tex]x &= \frac{1}{2}(4.8 + 0.8)[/tex]

[tex]&= 2.8[/tex]

[tex]y &= \frac{1}{2}(3.2 + 4.4)[/tex]

[tex]&= 3.8[/tex]

Thus, the correct coordinates of the center of dilation are (2.8, 3.8).

To learn more about dilation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3457976

#SPJ1

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

(4)

5x³ - 10x² - 3x + 6

factor out 5x² from first 2 terms and - 3 from last 2 terms

= 5x²(x - 2) - 3(x - 2) ← factor out (x - 2) from each term

= (x - 2)(5x² - 3)

----------------------------------------------------

(5)

9a³ - 45a² - 7a + 35

factor out 9a² from first 2 terms and - 7 from last 2 terms

= 9a²(a - 5) - 7(a - 5) ← factor out (a - 5) from each term

= (a - 5)(9a² - 7)

-----------------------------------------------------

(6)

5x²y - 15y - 2x² + 6

factor out 5y from the first 2 terms and - 2 from the last 2 terms

= 5y(x² - 3) - 2(x² - 3) ← factor out (x² - 3) from each term

= (x² - 3)(5y - 2)

The coordinates of B' after the sequence of transformations are given as follows:

B'(3,-4).

The coordinates of B are given as follows:

B(-3,1).

After a reflection over the y-axis, the x-coordinate of B is exchanged, hence:

B'(3, 1).

The rule for a 90º clockwise rotation is that (x,y) becomes (y,-x), hence the coordinates of B' after the 90º clockwise rotation are given as follows:

B'(1, -3).

The translation (x + 2, y - 1) means that 2 is added to the x-coordinate while 1 is subtracted from the y-coordinate, hence the final coordinates of B' are given as follows:

B'(3,-4).

More can be learned about transformations at https://brainly.com/question/29209050

#SPJ1

If triangle ABC has points A(2, -4), B(-3, 1), and C(-2, -6) and you perform the following transformations, B' would be at B' (3, -4).

In Geometry, the rotation of a point 90° about the center (origin) in a clockwise direction would produce a point that has these coordinates (y, -x).

By applying a reflection over the y-axis to the coordinate of the given point B (-3, 1), we have the following coordinates:

Coordinate B = (-3, 1)   →  Coordinate B' = (-(-3), 1) = (-3, 1).

Next, we would apply a rotation of 90° clockwise as follows;

(x, y)                               →            (y, -x)

Coordinate B' = (-3, 1) → Coordinate B' = (1, (-3)) = (1, 3)

Finally, we would apply a translation (x + 2, y - 1) as follows:

Coordinate B' = (1, 3) → (1 + 2, 3 - 1) = B' (3, 2).

Read more on reflection here: brainly.com/question/10260342

#SPJ1

The product is decreased by a factor of 16.

What is a factor?

In mathematics, a factor is a number or quantity that, when multiplied with another number or quantity, produces a given result. For example, in the expression 3 x 4 = 12, 3 and 4 are factors of 12. Factors can also refer to algebraic expressions, where they are the expressions that are multiplied together to obtain a larger expression.

Let's say we have two numbers, A and B, and we want to find the product of A and B.

The product of A and B is AB.

If we decrease A by a factor of 2, the new value of A becomes A/2. If we decrease B by a factor of 8, the new value of B becomes B/8.

So the new product of A/2 and B/8 is:

(A/2)(B/8) = AB/16

Therefore, the product is decreased by a factor of 16.

To learn more about factors, visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ1

Answer: The quotient is 199.277777778, the answer is the hundreds place

Step-by-step explanation:

199.277777778, the 1 in 199 is in the hundreds place :)

You could try factoring.

[tex]6x^2-x-1=(2x-1)(3x+1)\\3x^2+25x+8=(x+8)(3x+1)\\x^2+4x-32=(x+8)(x-4)\\2x^2+7x-4=(x+4)(2x-1)[/tex]

So your expression becomes...[tex]\frac{(2x-1)(3x+1)}{(x+8)(3x+1)}*\frac{(x+8)(x-4)}{(x+4)(2x-1)}=\frac{x-4}{x+4}[/tex].

The matching word are as follows:- center of dilation - C,corresponding angles - D,dilation - E,scale factor (of a dilation) - A,similar polygons - B respectively.

Corresponding angles are a pair of angles that have the same relative position at the intersection of two lines when one line is crossed by a transversal.

They are located in corresponding (matching) positions in congruent or similar figures, and are congruent if the figures are similar.

center of dilation: C.The fixed point that is parallel to each point on the pre-image and the corresponding point on the picture during a dilatation

corresponding angles: D.a pair of angles in two congruent or similar figures that are in the same relative position

dilation: E. The transformation in which each point on the image lies on the same line as the corresponding point on pre-image and a fixed point called the center of dilation.

scale factor (of a dilation): in a dilation, the constant  rate between the distance from the center of dilation and a point on the image and the distance from the center of dilation and the  matching point on thepre-image

similar polygons: B.two or  further polygons in which corresponding angles are  harmonious and the lengths of corresponding sides are in proportion.

To know more about scale factor visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30314658

#SPJ1

There is a significant linear correlation (r=0.80) between the heights of winning candidates and runners-up in recent US presidential elections.

Using the data from the table, here are the steps to determine the correlation coefficient and test for a linear correlation:

Calculate the correlation coefficient (r) using the formula: r = (nΣXY - ΣXΣY) / sqrt[(nΣX² - (ΣX)²)(nΣY² - (ΣY)²)], where n is the sample size, X and Y are the two variables (heights of candidates who won and runners-up), Σ denotes the sum of the values, and sqrt is the square root function.

Using a spreadsheet, we get r = 0.80.

Using the formula: df = n - 2.

The sample size (n) is 10, so df = 10 - 2 = 8.

Find the critical values of r using a table or calculator based on the degrees of freedom and the desired level of significance (0.05).

For a two-tailed test with df = 8 and α = 0.05, the critical values are ±0.632.

Since |0.80| > 0.632, we can conclude that there is a significant linear correlation between the heights of winning candidates and runners-up.

Therefore, the correlation coefficient is 0.80, and the critical values are ±0.632. There is a significant linear correlation between the heights of winning candidates and runners-up in recent presidential elections.

To learn more about linear correlation please click on below link        

https://brainly.com/question/28935414

#SPJ1